[000:00:00;00] the, there are no means of countering such weapons. today, the modern air defense system is available in the world. and the missile defense systems being built by the americans in europe do not intercept such missiles. flooding or putting confirmed with russia used a brand new hypersonic, missed on the west, cannot defend against, in order to strike a military industrial facility in new printing. let them are put in issues and start warning that moscow can attack military sites and countries that allow their weapons to be used against drugs and washington condemns moscow over the current escalation of the conflict, but ignores the fact. it was the us that unable to crime different, that's long range missile strikes,

which russia had warned against the live in moscow. i'm rachel ruble. this is our t international latimer boot and has confirmed russia used an experimental hypersonic missile to attack a military industrial sites in ukraine. the russian president specified the projectile was equipped with a non nuclear warhead. it said the missile can travel at such a high speed that it can penetrate any western air defense that i either see. friends, if i knew that i would like to inform the personnel of the armed forces of the russian federation, the citizens of our country are friends around the world. and those who continue to harbour allusions about the possibility of inflicting a strategic defeat on russia about the events that are taking place to day in the

zone of the special military operation. namely about the use of western manufactured long range weapons on our territory. as they continued the escalation of the west and provoked conflict in ukraine, the united states and its nato allies earlier announced that they were authorizing the use of their long range precision guided weapons systems on the territory of the russian federation. experts are well aware and the russian side has repeatedly emphasized this that it is impossible to use such weapons without the direct involvement of military specialists from the countries producing such weapons. still on november, 19th, 6, operational technically, marseilles attack m. s. produced by the us and on november 21st and the combined miss all the tech with the u. k. made storm shadow and us made hi, my systems were launched against military facilities on russian territory in the brown skin cost regions. since then, as we have repeatedly emphasized, the original conflict and ukraine previously provoked by the west has taken on

elements of global character. our air defense system has repelled these effects. as a result, the goals that were obviously set by the enemy were not achieved. a fire at the munition depot in debris and screeching, caused by falling debris from an attack. m. s. messiah has been extinguished. there were no casualties or serious damage in the course. the region an attack was made on one of the command posts of our group north as a result of the attack and the anti aircraft bethel. there are unfortunately casualties that are killed and wounded among the personnel of the external security unit and service personnel combined and operational stuff of the control center has not suffered any casualties and is normally directing the actions of our troops to destroy and expelled enemy units from the course region, once again, i would like to emphasize that the use of such weapons by the enemy is not able to effect the course of combat operations in the zone of the special military operation. our troops are successfully advancing along the entire line of contact.

all the tasks we have set for ourselves would it be accomplished in response to the use of us and british long range weapons on november 21st of this year, the russian armed forces launch to combine strike on one of ukraine's defense industry facilities. the combat conditions included a test of one of russia's newest, medium range missiles systems, in this case with a ballistic missile, with nuclear free hypersonic equipment to armies all engineers named it. originally, the test was successful. the goal of the launch was achieved, mostly west, one of the largest industrial complexes known since the days of the soviet union, and which still produces missile equipment and other weapons today was hit in the city of the net profit draft and ukraine. we are developing intermediate range and short range missiles as a response to us plants to produce and deploy intermediate range and short range missiles in europe and asia. we believe that the us made a mistake by unilaterally withdrawing from the treaty on the elimination of medium

range and short range missiles in 2019 under far fetched predicts. today the united states not only produces such equipment, but as we can see in the course of measures to train its troops. it does have worked out the issues of transferring that advancements out of systems to different regions of the world, including europe and what is more they are conducting training exercises under use . let me remind you that russia has voluntarily, unilaterally committed itself not to deploy medium range and short range missiles until us weapons of this kind are deployed in any region of the world. i repeat, we are conducting live tests of the original missile system in response to the aggressive actions of nato countries against russia. the question of further deployment of medium and short arrangements solves, would be decided by us depending on the actions of the united states and its satellites. we will determine the targets for further tests of our newest missile systems on the basis of threats to the security of the russian federation. we consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against military facilities of those

countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facilities. and in the event of an escalation of aggressive actions, we will also respond decisively defending the mirror in like manner. i recommend that the ruling elite, so those countries that are planning to use the military contingents against russia seriously consider this, of course, choosing if necessary, and does that retaliatory measure of targets to be hit by such systems as auditioning on ukrainian territory? we will proactively notify civilians and also ask citizens of friendly states who are there to leave the danger zone. we will do this for humanitarian reasons, openly as publicly, without the theatre of opposition from the enemy who also receive this information . why without fear? because there are no means of countering such weapons. today, these missiles attack targets at the speed of mach 10, that is 2 and a half to 3 kilometers per 2nd. the world's current air defense systems. and the missile defense system of the americans in europe do not intercept such miss science. this is impossible. i emphasize once again, that it is not for russia,

but the united states that has destroyed the international security system. and by continuing to fight and cling to their who generally, they are pushing the entire world towards the global conflict. we have always preferred and are now ready to result all contentious issues by peaceful means. but we are also ready for any development. if anyone still doubts this, it is in vain. there will always be a response to according to the russian president, they are rush. nick is a state of the art intermediate range, ballistic missile. it can travel up mach 10, that's up to 3 kilometers per 2nd. mr. put and emphasized the advanced hypersonic projectile can penetrate any defense. well, here's a map showing the approximate time it would take for the russian act to reach major european capitals. now, if we consider a speed of 3 kilometers per 2nd, that's 10800 kilometers per hour. that means it would take about 20 minutes to reach london from russia's couplets. then you are launched complex. it would be 12 minutes to warsaw, a neighbor of ukraine,

and one of the main proponents of escalating the conflict. also, it would take 15 and 20 minutes respectively for the irish nick to reach berlin or paris, or to senior corresponding or i guess the of reports labs. the biggest take away as this is that russia now has the right to strike at the country is the manufactured in these all because the specialists are involved in putting for example, slide promises, slide pots into these missiles and the service in them. the bosher now has the right to strike a targets in these countries ways, which is why he said that this cold places now take it on the characteristics of a global company. like they have to describe the idea as new system, which is a hypotonic, but least it can be solved for the range of thousands of kilometers that can travel

a $2.00 to $3.00 kilo, which is the 2nd we know applies the me, solid seals that the united space of states spend almost 2 decades building the asia pacific region in europe, and because of which it is a nation ruined relations with russia. the pop, the enmity began for the united states. me, so she'll do will remember that speech in unit 2008, which is where the chasm, the cracks, the into a chasm. and this is russians. response essentially what vladimir said, because of your actions, because you will lift it on restrictions on far you will be solved as are assisting inquiry, you will need to solve into russia. we have come out, we have developed and we have deployed tests that use this new me solve which you

have knew who against such a stress. but there is no system on the existence that can intercept the afternoon . me, sol, traveling 2 to 3000 meters per 2nd and we saw in the magazine published online uh, from various angles of that that to me. so what should i say? it is me so striking over the i the huge mush plugs in. uh yeah, but it does it all. it is one of the features defense industrial facilities. one of those same is in ukraine. it's still according to russian intelligence manufacturers. rocket pods. it's still manufacturers munitions. it repairs, conduct repairs of ahmed vehicles supplied by the west. abrams types net protected strategy guides, as well as um, with personnel carriers from bradley is the mazda infantry pricing vehicles

supplied by the west to ukraine. he's destroyed damaged by rush on the front line. they go back there for repairs. that was struck in a dramatic fashion. you could see that was miss. how's it impacted? like rays of life was a little sky and bob, so that was the point, a demonstration of strength, a demonstration. this isn't going to get any better that you are going to stop us and you've made yourselves more unsafe, then you would before you and box or they stood. and there is, there is still of course, the question of why is the, by the ministrations decide to lift these restrictions. especially given the most western weapons types me, solid types, russia has led to shoot jobs. evidently what be showing brands includes the region, the have, the heat, the warehouse, the i moved up in brands the falls,

the fall bowls would have been chosen. tremendous suddenly approved and said to me . so. busy i was struck down, they didn't to achieve the goal of destroying the storage that would serve as far as they would quickly push out. so it is again, gives to show the, not the man who is, and his administration, the russian government, with the support of the people that might be added. but they are adamant that they are determined to continue the course of russia is on the stress again, that russia was the result of things peacefully. but it takes to it takes the other side, also willing, being willing to negotiate the tool. as a result of these differences, all in the country, we have seen anything but russian and russia will respond to future threats to future escalations in a myriad with the bladder may approve and speeches such as this was generally

a talk with you. it may not be also the public, the masses, but i can tell you that depends on what the c i a in the white house will be sitting there. they'll be picking. so be clicking this feature part. they're going to try to see what he meant. the, the games that like maybe we can have and what, what the message the take away for that or for us the public but for them is out of it. again, right. rep who can said that all items, the special military operations, the objective will be achieved. the 5 disease that some people have about the strategic the fees awaiting russia in the fields of you, craig. but this won't come to pass. and the busha will continue on until the end of special military operation. former us army officer status love cryptogenic agreed with the russian assertion that the new hypersonic missile might very well be capable of getting past any current defense system. the cypress,

on it boxed in. so that's about 3 kilometers per 2nd. so the missile cannot be stopped. the naked, i can't even try to go so fast. is zoomed by somebody, i guess the it'd be pick up some kind of the speed just like i said 3 kilometers per 2nd. the so the has multiple launch has multiple warheads showing me between 1011. so is there a radically, all of those could be loaded with a nuclear, uh, and the nuclear explosion. and this is a 1st fuel test, but has shown that it's very cable. and the launch is it small hypersonic speeds? any head start on target all by words. there are the systems that can actually uh, intercept at least slight, somewhat slower. i personally missed. it's called the s find that and again, it's russian. so in the west, no, there's absolutely nothing that can stop the hypersonic missile,

especially if it's a strictly ballistic missile. theoretically, if it's flying from far enough, people are hyper sonic, you could do a form along the ballistics. and if you have enough timeline, something to try to get it this way, i see a rag. the problem with this was like a control, for example, which hypersonic muscle is this maneuver. so any ballistics formulate your system works out if it has enough time to work anything out from signing of the missile do in back isn't worth anything, doesn't. this will just move out of the way. it was bodies and series and magic. it won't happen. we won't get to get what is fluffy and we can do whatever we want and we won't get it. that's a pretty big. yeah, that's a, as a free long shot in a big mess. the problem is a force we're basing. the western metallic north mentality has always involved exterminating the scoring and murdering civility. if you look at historically the way the west has pointed toward to billions of always been a target, which i mean,

while the pen gone expressed concerns about russia launching that new hypersonic missile that emphasized that. but washington is supposedly not seeking a direct conflict with moscow. it will continue to provide supplies to key of also the white house of his russia, of escalating the conflict. but the questions about whether it was in fact, to us, that instigated it escalation, at every turn at every step is coming from russia. they're the ones who are escalating this. they're the ones who started this war is because of their aggression into a summer territory. ukraine and this work and, and today you hear say this over and over again. it can, if russia would stop the war and stop what they're doing with their aggression. so this is an aggression from their side. for a long time, the white house are using these long ridge type in missiles into russia to attack targets. instead rush of would escalate. the war would be really been fight retaliation. so why now, why change the policy now?

i'm not going to get into specifics. we're going to continue to be there for ukraine. this is a president that has led on making sure ukraine has what it needs on in the battlefield. bought a rep it and the statement comes after the russian m o. d said it's air defense systems down to u. k. produced a storm, a shadow of missiles that follows the reported approval by both washington and london for to have to use their long range weapons and strikes on russia. they've come on, says the west is adding fuel to the fire of the conflict. would you believe culture, a new escalation has occurred? this is an irresponsible position taken by the outgoing us administration. they are continuing to add fuel to the fire of the ukrainian conflict by preventing any possible dynamics for its resolution. while using ukraine as a to in the war against russia. despite the wes a pair approval for you trained to use this long range missiles to strike russia

moscow's forces are making strides across the front lines. here's a math comparing control of today's battlefield versus just a month ago, according to open source data from the institute for the study of war. russian troops have games nearly 6 times more territory this year than last year. meanwhile, and the okay, there was swift criticism of the move to allow the storm shadow strikes, clean the id, ukraine's good, when frankly, just for the beds under the water is going on for long enough that the cache to the massive or we're doing is helping to prolong a style might the prime minister should make a statement to parliament immediately to confirm whether u. k. missiles had been fired into russia. he must tell the british public if this means we are now at war with a nuclear power. what risk this poses to people in britain and why this action was taken without any approval from parliament? as british storm shuttle missile slammed into russia, the british government announces 500000000 pound of cuts in defense capabilities.

not a good look. the case heritage party later david carts and spoke out against ukraine's use of british long range missiles for attacks against russia. a stone shadow weapons used against russian territory against your will. i would say against the wishes of most people in the u. k. who just see this is something that is going on so far. far too long. we tall saw too many people snorted on both sides is completely unnecessary. the people won't listen to wind down and to deescalate agents and make peace and to get back to some kind of normality in the region of the world. but we have this prime minister now to a salma, who is the most unpopular prime minister in my memory. you know, he's only been there for 4 or 5 months, but his approval ratings have gone down through the floor. he is making bad decision off the bad decision on out the everything. and this is really,

really terrible because this could lead to what is leading to direct conflict between the u. k and russia, because these are british missiles which are being fired into russia. they don't think that there is going to be a response from polluting against western nations. they see what they think that'll be a response may be against ukraine. it isn't gonna affect them. it's not going to affect them personally. the other reason is the military industrial complex and the hedge funds based in new york and london. they've got so much invested in ukraine. they see it as a nation. they can apply them to they want to economically. and next, they want to create the narrative that puts in as an aggressor the russia is the aggressor and they're the ones that are threatening the west because you basically got to live. so they've been perpetuates thing for nearly 3 years. now. one is that boots and woke up one morning in february 2022 and decided it was going to be invited ukraine. but another reason will give the background story. it goes to

getting the terrible things that happened in the 8 years previous. me going right back to of 2014 the are the fullest narrative is that they say when boots in is gonna roll of his time zone across the western europe like hitler date in the 1940 is again, that's a complete fabrication and a complete lie. but that is what they're trying to push into the minds of people in the west to get them to support this insane minutes reaction and escalation of what the west is doing for the west and the let's put it like that in, in ukraine so, so that those are the lawyers that they put up to try to try to keep this going across live now to strategic affairs expert, how made con, all most tricky. i mean, good to have you on the program with us. we heard the white house accusing russia of escalating this complex yet it was the us and the u. k. that gave the green

light to crane to conduct the long range strikes. what are your thoughts on that? so thank you very much, rachel. i think of we must understand now one thing that this ukraine ratio of war is entering into a very serious and danced stage on dance level allow uh because of the uh what uh, i mean uh, a brief gum. indeed, by giving a shadow, a strong share to me, tiles and the body see which i did need to end the american thing then decided to attack inside the machine directory. we test. i mean, the, we didn't need to understand that the, there will be a grant reaction from russia and deluge of progress yet is, is, is a, is, there is no question that the issue and ad blinking would not react on it. but i'm just thinking that i mean, it has not been the consent of the people from your body. you get because of the people that have been in the price for the was the last 20 years. and particularly, i would remind that and the, the war time over

a 1000000 people protesting against tony blair's decision going with the nato, a phone to was and still uh, the british lead that i've never gotten and did the bad decision. and again, as the liberal government would be, but i'm not expecting from kias dogma to do that. and certainly in this day, even the parliament has not been taken in confidence by gabriel, for giving long range of these. besides, do you cry? on the other hand of you know, that one thing very clear and what, and what did you gaze doing? whatever your ip is doing at the moment it is through the i would say, support and with the encouragement from and consent from americans. and a man is, i believe this is a very dangerous game. what do you, what they are doing? it is, it is going to be an in dot, a conflict between $3.00 and $4.00 nuclear power countries. this is the very dangerous situation. i mean, i would like to save you something historically. uh, you know, the pilot uh,

i receive the word super bowers heads on the white board one then the doctor and change the 2nd one was the doctor, a change in the america became the supervisor. and then the ratio became and then the cord lot of time. but this time, avoidance, and especially nato and americans. and all the, you know, things must understand, inventor gone, and london in brussels everywhere. that this is not a normal conflict unless they can not use ukraine. is the proxy without uh, you know, uh, less thing going to be dog involving them said they would carry on doing that. that it is a clear sign that it is you better your up is clearly involving themselves itself. and it is very dangerous. i think uh, i think there is, there is, must be sense, must be very low. and it must be some reaction from the public and from the beginning of the and you get that this uh,

they should not be any supplies to would you cry in part of this, you guys are not allowed to use any british weapons on your piano. nichols supplied weapons because it would escalate the law at a different tablets. it could turn into a new get lot. they have not understanding that. it is a serious fact. it is not for the sake of saying it. i think europe is not taking it very serious. i mean, i think it's, it's clear that the people do not have an appetite for this conflict to continue or even expand. but when the prime minister dearest armor was asked about whether ukraine's use of british missiles could end up endangering the u. k, he actually doubled down and said london must continues to support key f. why do these western leaders ignore the will of the people that they're supposed to be working for? yes, certainly they have always ignored the people that it is the method of palestine and goes up. what is happening to the people that broke desperately millions on the rewards, but i mean uh you invested warranty to listen to them. america didn't listen to

them. it's a decent history we have seen. and uh, sadly, i am on keeps the emphasizing that the best do well it's been badly used by americans, and this is the price they really have to pay if medicaid is using them badly. and it, it was not expected that this video to build a, you know, use by americans, that it may don't, is, is doing what they're doing is, is putting the whole world into a danger endangered off avoid lot, 3. this is a very, very significant things. what's happening, the last 2 tvs that he bought from new york time, the what the, what you know, this job i do government is doing before the end of their tub. what they are doing is they're closing on the possibilities and doors for the upcoming pledge and come to blows dishwasher. and this was, this is what making me so much. what is that on the one that's a drawback problem is that he even find a solution to and this was all the other had. the body's been escalated and no one to blame,

but the bite and refreshing himself. what kind of reaction has there been in the u . k, or what kind of reaction are you expecting there after putting, made this announcement that russia had conducted this hypersonic missile launch on ukraine? i mean, i would see it sadly. uh, i get it all over the world similar lead america and email as well. the i would say that the media does not show all the oddities. it is a contorted media event of the, i mean not. so what i would then see is the one side of the picture, and sadly that side of the picture makes pointing a bad man. that side of picture shows the trust she has the doing that. gretchen, that side of the big just shows that you, you grind is suffering, but actually they do not show that. what are the reasons why let's yet have a deputy. they do not show the, but he's a,

that's why this law has been pro long so much. they do not show that it is a that there was a clear promise from nato and the american at 30 years ago that they would be new expansion of nato towards the machine borders. or they do not explain or they do not let the know that how many brought me to the commitments has been broken by the need to in the americas to patricia in this position. i believe that, but it is a tie with a vest and people have to stand up the rest of the country. you know, public have to come out that they are paying the price for the water, which d, i'm not supposed to be the part of the, of, of the issue to have not been any bought, if the best and would, would have not supported nato like that you grind would have not been, you know, involved in the lot because this is all of a, i would say, do you do the support and you, brian, being the proxy of nato and americans. that is a visa. okay, we're gonna leave it there. how many ton i most tricky strategic affairs expert.

thank you for your time, mike. thank. all right, that is going to do it for me for now, but do stay with us. my colleague is charlotte davinsky will be in next in about half an hour to pick things up with more of today's top of the story by the the misery vehicles likes of minors and political dance can be read below is fighting range. do you have to use today deals with damaged vehicles. the front lines has moved on soldiers search and

salvage seemingly the the

the