the the, with the combat conditions, including the test of one of russia's newest, medium range missiles systems, in this case with a ballistic missile, with nuclear free hypersonic equipment. armies all engineers named it originally. there are no means of countering such weapons today. the russian president confirms boscoe successfully hit the military targeting ukraine with a state of the art hypersonic mess up loving it puts and also warns. but moscow can attract ministry sides of the countries that allow the weapons to be used against his country. pointing out this type of funding strikes was a direct result of the west escalator re passions. i emphasized once again that it is not for russia, but the united states that have destroyed the international security system. and by

continuing to fight and cling to their who generally, they are pushing the entire world towards global conflict. shopped in contradiction that washington says he wants to avoid war with russia, but will continue. it's mandatory support for kia. we don't seek a wider regional conflict. we don't seek war with russia. what we're focused on is continuing to support ukraine with what it means. the trouble considering the coverage of the latest drug sweeping the world right now. this is already to national. i have michael watching right now. a lot of the puts in the has confirmed an experimental hypotonic mess all has been used to attack of military industrial flight. the new frame of the russian president is specified that he was equipped with a non nuclear warhead. he said the must solve, can travel as such a high speed. no air defenses can stop it. in response to the use of us and british

long range weapons on november 21st of this year, the russian armed forces launch to combine strike on one of ukraine's defense industry facilities. the combat conditions included a test of one of russia's newest, medium range missiles systems, in this case with a ballistic missile, with nuclear free hypersonic equipment. armies all engineers named it. originally, the test was successful. the goal of the launch was achieved. one of the largest industrial complexes known since the days of the soviet union and which still produces missile equipment and other weapons today was hit in the city of the net profit to ask in ukraine. i repeat, we are conducting live tests of the arrest nick missile system in response to the aggressive actions of nato countries against russia. the question of further deployment of medium and showed the arrangements of would be decided by us depending on the actions of the united states and its satellites. or we will determine the targets for further tests of our newest missile systems on the basis

of threats to the security of the russian federation. we consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against military facilities of those countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facilities. and in the event of an escalation of aggressive actions, we will also respond decisively and in the mirror in like manner. yes. well, let's discuss the issue now here in austin. do with arctic correspondent, don't know what i've done is good to have you join me now. things are happening so fast. can you 1st take us through what the president had to say? well, a lot of our put and essentially gave a detailed explanation as to how moscow was going to respond to the west. the recent provocative activity. of course, we're talking about their green lighting of western supplied long range missiles for use to strike deep within russian territory. and in response, so essentially the russian president said that moscow is going to use their new hypersonic missiles. they cannot be intercepted by any sort of air defense systems . but he also said that he, mandatory and considerations. they don't go out the window right. rush is going to

warn civilians in areas that are being prepared to be hit before any strikes. take place. of course choosing if necessary and does that retaliatory measure targets to be hit by such systems as auditioning on ukrainian territory. we will proactively notify civilians and also ask citizens of friendly states who are there to leave the danger zone. we will do this for humanitarian reasons, openly, publicly, without fear of opposition from the enemy, who also receive this information. why without fear? because there are no means of countering such weapons. today, these missiles attack targets at the speed of mocked and that is 2 and a half to 3 kilometers per 2nd. the world's current air defense systems and the missile defense system of the americans in europe do not intercept such as science . this is impossible. we have always preferred and are now ready to resolve all contentious issues by peaceful means. but we are also ready for any development. if anyone still doubts this, it is in vain. there will always be a response. sweet. another thing vladimir putin said was that this recent

escalation from the west actually gave the ukraine conflict a more global character. because of course, green lighting, these missiles, tac comes in for use in russian territory. i mean, these missiles can actually carry nuclear warheads. that's something that not a lot of people know that can be used conventionally, or they can carry nuclear warheads as well. so this is a threat to basically any country on the entire planet, if uh, the ukrainian forces, they're gonna start using those sorts of missiles on russian territory and essentially evoking having to evoke a tit for tat response for, from russia to use their own ballistic hypersonic missiles as well, and this is really compounded by the facts. another thing that vladimir putin brought up, the fact that the numerous international nuclear missile treaties have been scrapped because of the actions of the west. like the international uh, like the intermediate range nuclear forces, treating other related agreements as well. let's take

a listen to what platinum are putting out to say about that. it was not a scroll up to this, but i watched it as they continued the escalation of the west and provoked conflict in ukraine. the united states and its nato allies earlier announced that they were authorizing the use of their long range precision guided weapons systems on the territory of the russian federation. experts are well aware, and the russian side has repeatedly emphasized this that it is impossible to use such weapons without the direct involvement of military specialists from the countries producing such weapons. on november, 19th, 6 operational tactically, marseilles attack m. s produced by the us and on november 21st in the combined miss all attacked with the u. k. made storm shadow and us made hi ma systems were launched against military facilities on russian territory in the brown skin course regions. since then, as we have repeatedly emphasized, the regional conflict in ukraine previously provoked by the west has taken on elements of a global character. our air defense system has repelled these effects. as a result,

the goals that were obviously set by the enemy were not a chief to a fire at the munition depot in the bronze region caused by falling debris from an attack m. s missile has been extinguished. there were no casualties or serious damage in the course. the region an attack was made on one of the command posts of our group north as a result of the attack and the anti aircraft battle. there are unfortunately casualties. there are killed and wounded among the personnel of the external security units and service personnel. the combined and operational stuff of the control center has not suffered any casualties and is normally directing the actions of our troops to destroy and expelled enemy units from the course region. we are developing intermediate range and short range missiles as a response to us plants to produce and deploy intermediate range and short range missiles in europe and asia. we believe that the us made the mistake by unilaterally withdrawing from the treaty on the elimination of medium range and

short range missiles in 2019 it's under far fetched ridiculous stuff. and then today, the united states not only produces such equipment, but as we can see in the course of measures to train its troops. it does have worked out the issues of transferring their advanced masonic systems to different regions of the world, including yours and what is more, they are conducting training exercises under use. let me remind you that russia has voluntarily, unilaterally committed itself, not the deployed medium range, in short, the range missiles until us weapons of this kind are deployed in any region of the world. i emphasized once again that it is not for russia, but the united states that has destroyed the international security system and by continuing to fight and cling to their who gemini, they are pushing the entire world towards global conflict. no, i don't. this weapon has been described to us on the experimental hypersonic best. so what do we do about it? well, dismissal called auditioning, which is an english hazel. it's really

a state of the art weapon. i mean, it can travel at mach 10, it can travel up to 3 kilometers per 2nd. i mean, that is very, very fast. and according to the russian present, again, is it missile that can penetrate any sort of defensive structure that it's going to be aimed at? and just to give you a better idea, i mean this thing travel so fast, but it would take 20 minutes for missile to reach its launch point in the russian complex called a couple of sting. yar it would take 20 minutes for to reach london. so that's a really jas when is it, didn't it just 20 minutes. and earlier we had a specialist on our show to discuss a little bit more of the details of this missile. so let's take a listen to what he had to say. the cypress on it boxed in. so that's about 3 kilometers per 2nd. so the missile cannot be stopped. the naked, i can't even try to go so fast. is zoomed by somebody, i guess the it may pick up some kind of movement that i have the, the speed is, is like i said 3 kilometers per 2nd. the vessel has multiple launch. has

multiple warheads, somewhere between 1011. so is there a radically, all of those could be loaded with a nuclear, uh, and the nuclear explosion. and this is a 1st fuel to us but has shown that it's very cable. and the launch is it small hypersonic speeds and it hit start on target. all words, there are the systems that can actually uh, intercept, at least slightly, somewhat slower. i personally missed. it's called the s flight good. and again, it's rushing. so in the west, no, there's absolutely nothing that can stop the hypersonic missile, especially if it's a strictly ballistic missile. theoretically, if it's flying from falling off or hypersonic, you could do a formula, honda ballistics. and if you have enough timeline, something to try to get it this way, i see a red problem with missiles like a control, for example, which hypersonic of missile is this maneuver. so any ballistics formulate your

system works out if it has enough time to work anything out from signing of the missile. do impact isn't worth anything because and this will just move out of the way. it was bodies and series. imagine it won't happen. we won't get it. what is fluffy and we can do whatever we want and we won't get it. that's a pretty big. yeah, that's a, it's a pretty long shot and a big mess. the problem is, of course we're facing, the western metallic north for mentality has always involved exterminating the scoring and murdering civilian. if you look at historically the way the west has quantity wars. so billions of always been a target with which i've done what has been the international reaction to all of this. well, there hasn't been that much of it. to be honest. i mean, we heard a kind of wishy washy statement from that you for an affair spokesman, who said that the, the you were still assessing all the facts, trying to uh, get its own line straight. we heard from the un secretary general antonio gutierrez, who said that it was boring,

that russia is now using its own ballistic missile. of course, like we've been saying on the program that didn't start with russia launching a ballistic missile, but with the west screen lighting their own missiles for ukrainian use on russian territory. so that's been basically what we've heard from around the world. all right, that was put in has said that he does the united states that has been involved in the escalade tree rhetoric and also we fucking fox outright, the escalating this compet. what has been the reaction to washington? well, that's right. of course. like we've been saying, i mean, this decision that to launch the hazel missile at a target in ukraine. i mean, it was in response to washington green lighting the use of attack comes missiles on russian territory. and the, the us response essentially has just been, well, we're going to just continue supporting ukraine. no matter how much this actually escalates the conflict, the escalation at

a return at every step is coming from russia. they're the ones who escalate this. they're the ones who started this war is because of their aggression into a summer territory. ukraine. and this work and, and today you hear, say this over and over again. it can, if russia would stop the war and stop what they're doing with their aggression. so this is an aggression from their side. for a long time, the white house are using these long ridge type into russia to tie target and said russia would escalate, the war would be really been by retaliation. so why now, why change the policy now? i'm not going to get into specifics. we're going to continue to be there for ukraine. this is a president that has led on making sure ukraine has what it needs on in the battlefield. so the white house had that to say, and they pentagon also commented, they had something pretty similar, essentially saying where, you know,

we're not at war with russia, but we're just going to continue giving serious weaponry to a country that was actually a more of that. we don't seek a wider regional conflict. we don't seek war with russia. and i think we've been pretty clear about that from this podium. and from this administration, we've seen this type of, you know, dangerous, reckless rhetoric before, from the president, putin. so what we're focused on is continuing to support ukraine with what it means . the ukraine, as you know, has been successful and continuing to push back against russian aggression. and so definitely a worrying situation when the west seems to take actions that are escalating the conflict and then seem to not think that any consequences are going to come out of it. but as we heard from the russian present, of course, moscow is not going to stand by and just, you know, not answer this, these sorts of escalations in the, in the conflict without any sort of response. or i would have to leave you here. now everything is moving on so fast that will wait to see how things turn out.

ultimately, what it has said, we can negotiate this and resolve all of this, and we look forward to that and much of the world as well done a quarter. thanks for bringing us up to speed on this. right. the western media was quick to react to the develop and stating it's a warning of world war 3, and it appears to be a threat to the us and the u. k. all right, yeah, my colleague richard rubles spoke to form a pentagon policy on the list. mike, a model of who says of russia has been forced to respond in this way as washington never takes buttons warning seriously of the by the administration. stress is it doesn't have a plan, does not have a strategic plan. it is a, it is a looking for ways to continue continually to put the burden on on and couldn't. and the end russia, when it, when, in fact it was us policy started in 2014 and, and did end up tomato expansion. that drove good to,

to do the special military operation. i think, i think the escalation is, is more psychological. even though the, the printer is reason the only because the west has to control the missiles, they're the ones who have the intelligence, they do the data entry and, and the maneuvering of the, of the messiah so. so there is nato participation. and this is what's, what is appears to be the escalade story aspect of this, although they've been using the missiles for some time. yeah, michael, you really have a unique perspective and because you serve previously as a senior security policy analyst and the pentagon, so help us to understand why the bite and administration made this decision to allow to have to use these long range missiles to hit russia because it, it had resisted up until the election and now that the administration is on the way

out, the democrats have loss now of a sudden by the report of the gibbs, this green line. i think it's because of the loss and the fact that it, this is just one more way, the democrats and getting back at the republicans and to trump. it to basically lock him in on a policy that failed policy before he even takes office. this is basically an attempt by the democrats to set trump up for failure and has clearly stated that russia will respond to any escalation against his country. why don't western powers take them seriously? because putting says it's a and, and then he does the thing and everybody seems to be surprised by it. why? well, take him since has been the history of, of the relationship between the united states and russia. they never took him serious. they never took mr. put seriously back in december of 2021. when he says you are approaching my red line, don't do it. you are a threat to with, with your nato expansion. your a threat to my, to, to,

to the federation. i think the, the, the west wants to get beyond that. they don't want to, they don't want to be exposed as to that, if this was their doing an or on doing to, to, to do this by this native expansion. in spite of half a dozen agreements that were violated called that, that establish what they call into visibility. you don't arm the west at the expense of the east. and now this has given them a whole new life. and this supports the military industrial complex. this is, this is good for their, for their pockets and, and it supports their, their, their initiatives and it gives, gives nato now a whole new perspective. now they want to expand not only north to the arctic but, but also to the east and the japanese and the south, preexisting what? we don't need that. so this is, this is very, very serious. and it's got to be nipped in the bud. and that's why an american people themselves are not for, that's why they want to, that's why they basically voted this administration out and, and,

and also voted against harris. ben waller, china has slammed to the us for threatening global stability after a top pentagon officials talked of a few to a mandatory exchanging, having to be in the most acceptable terms for washington. when we talk about non non nuclear in nuclear capabilities we, we certainly don't want to have have an exchange, right. i think that i think everybody would, would agree if we, if we have to have an exchange, then we want to do it on and then we want to do it in terms that are most acceptable to us, to the united states. so it's, it's terms that are, that are most acceptable to the united states that puts us in a position to continue to lead the world. if i'm going then the one,

the related statements made by the us official reflect the countries outdated mentality of pursuing gemini, so the, and seeking an absolute strategic advantage on the u. s. has in recent years kept upgrading its nuclear triad and advancing forward deployment of intermediate range missiles, an anti ballistic missiles, which i seriously disrupt a global strategic balance. instability, preaching, intensified military competition and confrontation and raised nuclear risk under the u. s. should fulfill it special and primary responsibilities in nuclear disarmament and further take substantial and substantive cuts due to its nuclear arsenal. i doing a lot of this discuss this, have more a with side find a base canadian blogger, and doing list alex report to fi. alex is good to have you told me now. so this think works much the for the us strategic come on, has said that any exchange would have to be on the terms most acceptable to washington, implying your quote, will continue to lead the world. i wonder how you characterize this because you're

smiling already. well, it's like a, a washed up box or that wants to get back into the ring and show they still have power. if they haven't been taught a lesson in afghanistan and the to golf wars. well, if they keep it off, they're going to be taught another lesson here and it won't be on their terms. it will be on russian terms. but they think it has been down to the us mindset that's obsolete. and reminding washington of its nuclear disarmament responsibilities. what kind of a signal is china sending here? you know, that's an interesting question. you know, we have to take a step back here and understand that these are serious trading partners. now, all 3 of them, if you combine russia with china, you know, that's 240000000000 a year. and you have the americans and china as mass of trading partners as well.

rush, just kind of, pardon me, trying to kind of sending a signal here to the americans. you know, guys de escalate this, do it fast, do it professionally and do it without conflict. and i think they're trying to buy some time here before the trump administration. comes into effect here in january. all right, now, a day after launching west and long range missiles into russia, ukraine's bloody moods. the last key accused the moscow of reckless escalation, saying that it does not care what china and all the countries of the world thing not. let's pick and listen before i ask you, the question here between has taken both of these steps towards escalation, ignoring everyone in the world who's calling for the war not to expand. he does not care about what china, brazil, european countries, america, all other countries of the world are calling for. the world must react to it. now there is no strong reaction from the world. putting these very sensitive to this.

he is checking you the upon us to well, i believe you live. what do you make of that anyway? well rather interesting by putting is listening is listening to his trading partners is between to china. he is listening to bricks. he's listening to all these partners around the world because if they don't pay attention, this could happen to them. they have seen and witness the russian government be sanctioned into an oblivion with over 16 and a half 1000 sanctions in the last couple of years here. they're all watching and they're all waiting here. you know, this is interesting when we hear as a landscape talk um, it's like i think guilty are always screaming the lotus. now, if you're going to unleash, you know, hi maurice patriot air defense systems, leper to avery in tanks, the storm shadows it. when you're letting that rip into russia, there is going to be relentless power against you know,

mercy. and that is exactly the message that russia has sent ukraine last night. now in the same speeds velasquez and demands that the wells reacts to russia using new have us on the mess out. because the quote puts in is very sensitive to this. this is why he said, what is the play implying here? well, my understanding here is, again, he's beating the drums. he's on a fund raising mission here. he knows that the trump administration is coming in within the next few months here, and he needs money. any needs artillery. they've gone through it. the war chest is empty. and if you're going to mess around with the russians, remember they got the r s 28th, the r s 20 fours the r t 2 pm's. i mean, these are only sold for us. we just need to look at a, a, a tweets from yesterday from dmitri med for them that said, so what's a,

so that's what she wanted a hypersonic ballistic missile attack. well, you, dan, well, got it. and russia is slowly taking steps here, saying, listen guys, we're going to retaliate if you pass our go past this red line. and we certainly did. they sent that message out to the world. and i think we're just getting started here. in the us, we drew from the treaty with russia, prohibiting the production of intermediate range, ballistic missiles, 5 years ago with its offers, will excuse being that china is in the part of it in what ways does it reflect the ongoing escalation? well, the americans make up the rules as they go along. if it doesn't suit their military industrial complex, they will change the terrain and they will hide behind these agreements and continue to say, wow, we can bring this up to the un security council because you violated this. the americans guides. one of the most hate to track records in history. so as i said,

this is a clear message from russia going into this weekend. i hope the americans and the brits who have orchestrated this kinda bowed down here and except that hey, we better not take this any longer and any farther because russia could seriously unleashed one hell of a response here. and like i said, i think um, you know, the russian government has been playing this a pretty strategically. but again, this relentless power from russia, the no mercy and the no retreat. they're going to stick with it. it's in their blood. ok. but while north korea, on one hand has declared that due to us hostility, the korean peninsula could slide into the most destructive nuclear war. how grounded are those concerns? you know, again, we always see north korea being brought up here. and it's interesting, it's kind of like, you know,

if they want to aggregate the school yard pick on the bullying. well, they look at north korea is a bully, but in fact, it hasn't been involved in a conflict. yes, there is strong rhetoric, but that's because, you know, americans have failed to deliver some of their promises. uh, it came down on. now if we fast forward this, we gotta remember the relationship with the trump, with ministration with these regions is very good. but we are seeing it administration on their way out, and they have a very, very desperate man here in ukraine needing money fast. and unfortunately, the americans don't have the keys to be writing checks and loosely anymore because the new administration is on its way. now, washington is placing the blame squarely on moscow for escalating the war in ukraine. but the messiah launch comes just after the us both arrives long dreams, flights by your training to a rough in territory with moscow repeatedly warranty. guess what is your take on

this? when it comes to twisting narrative outright be on the faces of everyone. well, it's interesting. i don't normally get my research from the main stream media because they have been proven to be false for many years now. i think the average person knows exactly what's going on here and exactly who is pushing this. we're talking about a collective west co collaboration that has been are collaboration that has been putting billions of dollars on checked. that's right into the coffers of one of the most corrupt countries in the world to allegedly fight a war that allegedly they felt that was brought forward by approaching. well, let's go back and let's see when this started, this didn't start in 2022. this went all the way back to 2014 and we can bring up the minutes one and minutes to agreements. and that really will, um, you know, i tell your viewers to do the research on that,

that will really expose who is at fault here. and well, the buck stops with uh, yeah. all right, we have to leave you here. now i legs or puts a 5 i, china, base, canadians love and john lives. thank you so much for your insight. every time you're welcome. great. well, that's the update. now, thanks for watching, i'll see you again with more update. i'll be off by of the my fellow americans. today, our armed forces joined our nato allies in air strikes against the serbian forces the

success or try with the google drive it to see that either. so same thing will pass since the, my, you over to somebody, the fields that on that i do the feel a state monique, to set up that to me pretty much similar to, to, to type i most know what i'm going to else the, the quote so that plan degree the total distance are going to do the medical center as well. no. well it's good to know in light of your neck and connected model, even the goal is to.