the the, the, there are no means of countering such weapons. today, the modern air defense systems available in the world. and the missile defense systems being built by the americans in europe do not intercept such marseilles. ross and president confirms moscow successful. they hate the better treat, targeting ukraine with a state of the art has a sonic mess all lot of important and says key of being permitted to use western weapons to slide deep into russia. shows how the u. s. and they do have turn global security on an ad. i emphasize once again that it is not russia, but the united states that has destroyed the international security system. and by continuing to fight and cling to their who generally they are pushing the entire

world towards the global conflict and makes messages from the pentagon. no, which says washington wants to avoid the. busy with russia, but would continue, it's mandatory support for kids. we don't seek a wide or regional conflict. we don't seek war with russia. what we're focused on is continuing to support ukraine with what it means. the idea of watching our team to national reaching you would live from our new center of mass codes. i a michael portrait. now a lot of it put in has confirmed and experimental hypersonic mess style has been used to attack a military industrial sites and you train the russian president just specified that he was equipped with a non nuclear warhead. or you said the most solid can travel less thought the high speed. no air defenses could stop it. in response to the use of us and british long range weapons on november 21st of this year. the russian armed forces launch to

combine strike on one of ukraine's defense industry facilities. the combat conditions including the test of one of russia's newest, medium range missiles systems in this case, with a ballistic missile, with nuclear free hypersonic equipment. armies all engineers named it originally. the test was successful, the goal of the launch was achieved and one of the largest industrial complexes known since the days of the soviet union and which still produces missile equipment and other weapons today was hit in the city of the net profit to ask in ukraine i repeat, we are conducting life tests of the original missile system in response to the aggressive actions of nato countries against russia. the question of further deployment of medium in short arrangements solves, would be decided by us depending on the actions of the united states and its satellites. or we will determine the targets for further tests of our newest missile systems on the basis of threats to the security of the russian federation. we consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against military facilities of

those countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facilities. and in the event of an escalation of aggressive actions, we will also respond decisively and in the mirror in like manner a lot. let's discuss the issue now here with us to deal with arctic. correspondent don't know, quarter done. it's nice to have you told me now the last few days has been really dramatic. and so fast can you take us through what the president had to say? well, why don't we are putting essentially gave and a detailed explanation for how mos gallows responding to this most recent escalation of ukraine conflict by the western powers. of course we're talking about of this decision made by number of western countries to green light. the use of western supplied long range missiles for strikes by the ukrainian military on targets within russian territory. and essentially, moscow saying it's going to use it's and already has used actually its own hypersonic missiles in response to this that cannot be intercepted by any sort of anti air defenses known to the world today. but at the same time,

the russian present also said right amount of tearing considerations can't be throwing out the window, and russian forces are going to warn civilians before targeting and launching these missiles that a certain area. the use of course choosing if necessary, and does that retaliatory measure of targets to be hit by such systems as auditioning on ukrainian territory. we will proactively notify civilians and also ask citizens are friendly states who are there to leave the danger zone. we will do this for humanitarian reasons, openly, publicly, without fear of opposition from the enemy, who also receive this information. why without fear? because there are no means of countering such weapons. today, these missiles attack targets at the speed of mocked in that is 2 and a half to 3 kilometers per 2nd. the world's current air defense systems. and the missile defense system of the americans in europe do not intercept such miss irons . this is impossible. we have always preferred and are now ready to resolve all contentious issues by peaceful means. but we are also ready for any development. if

anyone still doubts this, it is in vain. there will always be a response. and also setting a speech that this most recent provocation by the west is actually given the ukraine conflict a much more global character. because again, these missiles that are being that had been already green lighted for ukrainian use on russian territory attack comes, for example, they can hold either conventional warheads or nuclear warheads. and there's really no way that russia can tell when they're heading their way onto russian territory. and this is compounded by the fact that of course the united states actually torpedoed the intermediate range nuclear forces treaty when it was the 1st one to pull out of it back in 2019 during the trump administration. so this is all really what comprises what put in, talked about and then in a speech, as essentially a serious escalation of the conflict. it was not as color to us, but i watched it as they continued the escalation of the west and provoked conflict

in ukraine. the united states and its nato allies earlier announced that they were authorizing the use of their long range precision guided weapons systems on the territory of the russian federation. experts are well aware, and the russian side has repeatedly emphasized this that it is impossible to use such weapons without the direct involvement of military specialists from the countries producing such weapons. companies like on november, 19th, u, 6 operational, tactically, messiahs attack m. s produced by the us us and on november 21st in the combined miss all attacked with the u. k. made storm shadow and us made hi, my systems were launched against military facilities on russian territory in the brown skin cost regions. since then, as we have repeatedly emphasized, the regional conflict and ukraine previously provoked by the west has taken on elements of a global character. our air defense system has repelled these effects. as a result, the goals that were obviously set by the enemy were not the chief to build a fire at the munition depot in the brown screeching caused by falling debris from

an attack m. s missile has been extinguished. there were no casualties or serious damage in the course. the region an attack was made on one of the combined forces of our group north as a result of the attack and the anti aircraft battle. there are unfortunately casualties that are killed and wounded among the personnel of the externally security unit and service personnel to come onto an operational stuff of the control center has not suffered any casualties and is normally directing the actions of our troops to destroy and expelled enemy units from the course region, we are developing intermediate range and short arrangements styles as a response to us plants to produce and deploy, intermediate range and short to range missiles in europe and asia. we believe that the us made the mistake by unilaterally withdrawing from the treaty on the elimination of medium range and short range missiles in 2019 it's under $550.00 predictors. step number today, the united states not only produces such equipment,

but as we can see in the course of measures to train its troops. it does have worked out the issues of transferring that advanced masonic systems to different regions of the world, including yours, and what is more, they are conducting training exercises under use. let me remind you that russia has voluntarily, unilaterally committed itself, not the deployed medium range, in short, the range missiles until us weapons of this kind are deployed in any region of the world. i emphasize once again that it is not for russia, but the united states that has destroyed the international security system. and by continuing to fight and cling to their who gemini, they are pushing the entire world towards global conflict. this is all i've done, this weapon is described best on experimental hypersonic mess file. what do we know about it? well, it's called audio shanequa or hazel and english. and it really is a state of the art web. and like you said, it's hypersonic. it also can travel at mach 10 that's up to 3 kilometers per 2nd. and according to the russian president is

a weapon that can strike any sort of defensive structure and destroyed it can't be shot out of the sky either. and now just to give our viewers a bit of an idea of just how fast it can travel, we have a graph here that shows where these missiles are launched from composed in your over here in russian territory. it would take only 20 minutes for it to reach london and paris from that area in couples, 10 yard, and also to make it to berlin. it would only take or, or war solve. rather as you can see on the map right here would only take 12 minutes to reach that as well. and to get to berlin just 15 minutes, like i said before, power is also 20 minutes alongside with london. so these are really, really short timeframes for a missile of any sort. and really we had a specialist on the show talk a little bit more about the, the technical specifications of this new are actually a missile. so let's take a list. the type of sonic boxed in. so that's about 3 kilometers per 2nd. so the

missile cannot be stopped. the naked, i can't even try to go so fast. is zoomed by somebody, i guess a is a pick up, some kind of that i have a to speed just like i said, brief loaners per 2nd. the missile has multiple launch. has multiple warheads showing me between 1011. so is there a radically, all of those could be loaded with a nuclear, uh, and the nuclear explosion i wanted that can be used as uh, several, uh, uh, launch vehicles that are nuclear tip and the rest as deep ones. but at mach 10, uh, there is no be, uh there is no uh, in the air system, they can stop and they'll hit any target that they're a net. and this is a 1st fuel test. but in a showing that it's very capable, it launches in small hypersonic speeds. any head start on target, all words. all right. bring us up to speed with some of the reactions from the

international arena. well, we've heard a couple of them. i mean, we heard a pretty wishy washy statement from the use for an affair spokesman, who said that the you still assessing all the facts to come up with some sort of conclusion. we heard from the un secretary general antonio good terrorist. who said that it's concerning that russia's using the hypersonic missile in ukraine. but on the other hand, we did hear some different opinions. for example, from serbia as president. he said that the west has to be out of its mind, different things that's going to allow for the use of western made long range missiles on russian territory and then not expect a response from russia. right. we also heard from hungry use for administer, who said, of course, it's a concerning situation. the ballistic missiles are being exchanged between ukraine and, and russia. and it's just not a good situation. essentially, what i put in a set is the united states that is involved in the escalation the of the of this

price is in ukraine. why does washington said, well, it's been pretty unapologetic despite the fact that bite and seems pretty determines to bring the world as close to the brink of the global war as possible before he leaves office. he doesn't have much time left before donald trump is expected to take the white house, of course, because the white house is already commented on the, on this saying that they're just going to continue supporting ukraine despite whatever russia does. an escalation, at every turn at every step is coming from russia. they're the ones who escalated this. they're the ones who started this war is because of their aggression into a summer territory. ukraine. and this war can and today you hear say this over and over again. it can't, if russia would stop the war and stop what they're doing with their aggression. so this is an aggression from their side. for a long time, the white house are using these long ridge type in missiles into russia to attack

target and say russia would escalate, the war would be really been fight retaliation. so why now, why change the policy now? i'm not going to get into specifics. we're going to continue to be there for ukraine. this is a president that has led on making sure ukraine has what it needs on in the battlefield of the pentagon also chimed in. and it also seems to think that the us can do whatever it wants without facing any consequences, because according to them, the spokes person of the pentagon, i mean, they're going to just continue supplying ukraine with weapons. they say that they're not at war with russia, but they're going to continue supplying weapons to this country that actually is actively aboard with russia. we don't seek a wider regional conflict. we don't seek war with russia. and i think we've been pretty clear about that from this podium and from this administration, we've seen this type of, you know, dangerous, reckless rhetoric before from the president boone. and what we're

focused on is continuing to support ukraine with what it needs to ukraine as you know, has been successful and continuing to push back against russian aggression to so essentially there's not really that much surprising about the way that russia has reacted to these actions that washington has taken what's really actually concerning is the fact that the united states and the west in general, seems to be conducting itself in a way where it's closing its eyes to the consequences of its own actions. or i wait to see how things would turn out in the coming days. thank you. don quartet for bringing us up to speed here. right now, the western media was quick to react to the development, stating it's wanting of world war 3, and appears to be of threats to the us in the u. k. already up, my colleague rachel ruble spoke to form a pentagon secuity on the list of mike, a model of who says a russia has been forced to respond as washington never takes buttons warning

seriously of the by the administration. stress is it doesn't have a plan. does not have a strategic plan, it is a, it is a looking for ways to continue continually to put the burden on, on and putting, and the end russia when it, when in fact it was us policy started in 2014 and, and did end up tomato expansion, that drove good to, to do the special military operation. i think i think the escalation is, is more psychological even though the, the ukrainians reason, the only because the west has to control the missiles. they're the ones who have the intelligence, they do the data entry and, and the maneuvering, know the of the messiah so. so there is nato participation. and this is what's, what is appears to be the escalade story aspect of this, although they've been using the missiles for some time. yeah, michael,

you really have a unique perspective. and because there's sort of previously as a senior security policy analyst in the pentagon, so help us to understand why the biden administration made this decision to allow the key of to use these long range missiles to hit russian because it, it had resisted up until the election, and now that the administration was on the way out, the democrats have loss now of a sudden by the report of the gibbs this green line. i think it's because of the loss and the fact that it, this is just one more way, the democrats and getting back at the republicans and to trump. it to basically stuff lock him in on a policy that failed policy before he even takes office. this is basically an attempt by the democrats to set trump up for failure and has clearly stated that russia will respond to any escalation against his country. why don't western powers

take him seriously? because putting says it's a and, and then he does the thing and everybody seems to be surprised by it. why? well, he took him since has been the history of, of the relationship between the united states and russia. they never took, and serious. they never took mr. put seriously back in december of 2021. when he says you are approaching my red line, don't do it. you are a threat to with, with your nato expansion. your a threat to my, to, to, to the federation. i think the, the, the west wants to get beyond that. they don't want to, they don't want to be exposed as to that, if this was their doing an or on doing to, to, to do this by this nato expansion. in spite of half a dozen agreements that were violated called that, that established what they call into visibility. you don't on the west at the expense of the east. and now this has given them a whole new life. and this supports the military industrial complex. this is, this is good for their, for their pockets and, and it supports their, their,

their initiatives and it gives, gives nato now a whole new perspective. now they want to expand not only north to the arctic but, but also to the east and the japanese and the south koreans. is that what? we don't need that? so this is, this is very, very serious. and it's got to be nipped in the bud. and that's why an american people themselves are not for it. that's why they want to, that's why they basically voted this administration out and, and, and also voted against harris. and put in statement comes after the russia, m o. d said it's air defenses had down to u. k. per d. storm shadow myself. and that follows the reported approval by both washington in london for keith to use the long range weapons indeed strikes on russia. and the crown being says that the west is adding fuel to the fire, a place where the roof color a new escalation has occurred. this is an irresponsible position taken by the outgoing us administration. they are continuing to add fuel to the fire of the

ukrainian conflict by preventing any possible dynamics for its resolution, while using ukraine as a tool in the war against russia. now for my brothers m p, george galloway had been discussing the issue on this talk show and predicted at the time that that there will be a mandatory response from russia. a man not fit to be present done again is none the less fit to take the world into nuclear or oblivion. of course, the democrats are allowing him to do it because its primary purpose is not to assist the crew golf key of the me as the landscape. the primary purpose is to scuffle the incoming battleship called donald j. trump. they all determined to sink trump's presidency before it begins just as they walk in 2016. then it was russia, russia,

russia. it was the russia gate scandal. this time it's bombing rush. now let me make this abundantly clear. the russian response will be swift and overwhelming. you don't have to take my word for that. you can listen to the man with his finger on the russian nuclear trigger. vladimir putin has as late as september made clear that any attack by long range myself, supply and indeed targeted and indeed operated by nature will be treated as a declaration of direct involvement in the war by the whole allies, the whole alliance, even though only the united states and the united kingdom have thus breached putin's red line. all of them are closing the embassies in cab. today,

even those with the least to do with nato decision making, like the government in athens, for example, the nato alliance is thus jointly and separately responsible for a declaration of war on the perpetration of, of war uh the u. k is heritage part to lead davy court and he's also one of those a gas ukraine using u. k. supplied long range myself. a stone shadow weapons used against russian territory against the wall. i would say, against the wishes of most people in the u. k. who just see this is something that is going on the ball far too long. we tall, far too many people snorted on both sides is completely unnecessary. the people want this to wind down into the escalates and to make peace and to get back to some kind of normality in the region of the world. but we have this prime minister now

to a salma who is the most um, popular product minutes. in my memory, you know, he's only being there for 4 or 5 months, but his approval ratings have gone down through the floor. he is making bad decision off the bad decision on that the, everything. and this is really, really terrible because this could lead to what is leading to direct conflict between the u. k and russia, because these are british me. so i was, but you being fired into russia. i don't think that there is going to be a response from polluting against western nations. they see, well, they think they'll be a response may be against ukraine. it isn't gonna affect them. it's not going to affect them personally. the other reason is the military industrial complex and the hedge funds based in new york in london. they've got so much invested in ukraine. they see it as a nation. they can apply them to, they want to economically a next. they want to create the narrative that puts in as an aggressor,

the russia is the aggressor and they're the ones that are threatening the west because you basically got to live. so they've been perpetuate thing for nearly 3 years now. one is that boots and woke up one morning in february 2022 and decided it was going to be invited ukraine. but another reason will give you a background story. it goes to getting the terrible things that happened in the 8 years previous. me going right back to of 2014 the are the fullest narrative is that they say, what do you tell when boots in is going to roll of his time zone across western europe like hitler date in the 1940 is again, that's a complete fabrication and a complete lie, but that is what they're trying to push into the minds of people in the west to get them to support this insane minutes reaction and escalation of what the west is doing or the west and the the let's put it like that in, in ukraine so, so that those are the lawyers that they put up to try to try to keep this going. by

switching gears a little bit here, ron has issued orders for the activation of new advanced uranium enriching centrifuges. now the problem is that the angry response to being sent to bobby you as a nuclear watchdog over its failure to cooperate. but to ron, branded, the west and pushed motion as destructive such an action at a time when it ran. and the aga were on the path of constructive interaction, proves once again, that the 3 european and american governments are not at all honest in their claim of maintaining the credibility of the i. e a and that a ron's nuclear issue is merely an excuse, and a pretext for advancing their illegitimate goals. all, let's get more on this now is speak to are to use use of july lee, who's joining me from to ron? you said it's good to have you join me now. can you walk us through what we know about this new resolution of course market. everyone has been saying all

along that any provocative moves by the was to try to push or we want it to negotiations will likely backfire on all there we are. we are right after the i a past it said sure resolution. it won't significantly wrapped up. it's um, nuclear activities are they have now announced the launch of new advance centrifuges on the gun on the gas injection process into 3 new generations of its centrifuges are just moments after a that's resolution was passed, the electronic energy organization and the foreign ministry. what is a joint statement condemning the move, calling the move politically motivated, unrealistic, and of course, counter productive. the statement read that's uh, the one in atomic chief had ordered, which sally tory measures, including a launch of a significant collection of the new and advanced centrifuges. i do, most of these actions are within the framework of everyone's rights and obligations

under uh, the comprehensive safeguards agreement out there. one also said that these steps are, can be reversed. of course, if the west reconsider side. so we have your added sections. uh now what exactly does this resolution include? it actually the amounts that they have on improved its cooperation with the agency, the measure of proposed by point and germany as worthy, of course, uh with uh, support from the united states, calls for clarification on a choices of highly enriched uranium, found the 2 on disclosed sites and uh of course it asks also for some other access for i yeah. inspect or is that it was atomic facilities? uh now uh, 21 has uh, restricted uh, this access uh by the r e. a says 2019 following the west withdrawal from the 2015 to peer deal. and um, of course, saw the sewing reinstatement of sanctions on iran, which came out during trumps. first term. i wont had warned earlier or that if

western countries but it has warrant them out forced against um, uh the potential consequences of such a resolution during a visit from the head of the un atomic launched our roof. i will go see just a week before the board of governors meeting and give won't even indicated that if i'd be willing to abandon its uranium enrichment at 60 percent, you already have the resolution did not pass now. uh, they also certain that it did pass uh they were further distance themselves from their obligations under the j cpr away. in fact though they've already started to curtail there are commitments like cd and god the less than 4 percent enrichment cap sets by the deal. and also limiting inspectors as part of their also called the remedial steps to pressure european parties to uphold their end of the bargain. right now, officials, anyone are united in their belief that the deal is really useless if it's only one

sided, especially since western nations continue to impose sanctions against the wind while expecting the country to remain committed to the afford. so this is a high state situation that could do well, any chances for reference months between the one and the west and i can hinder the revival of an already stalled. look here, a course a y d. so july the r t we taking the farm to iran. now of course we can see some demonstrations behind. do we get to hear about that much later on? thank you very much. now still with our team to national for. busy the latest from around the world see you again with most or reset top of the out. the uranium dust moves to new areas,

the number of combat veterans diagnosed with severe diseases of the handling uranium weapons continues to rise. and i saw a positive 3 tell yes, click on you see a for a stall, wanna add the lack of the sloane puddle. i meant to deal uh that i go to and that has to be in a school store. it was over the m as while a name. normally i live, we need 6 boys to be in about kyle landscape. i need to stomach florida on the some . they'll be like easiest. i looked at it for me. see any, let's get my notes is on the uh the on our stuff. so them, it looks like the easiest type. what sort of deal? yes. that they click on the lease. what day would i be too much time over in the store? it that i will be a sit, i'm a sion of what i knew mountains lots. uranium spares neither its victims, noise, public choices over the 10 years following the war,

more than 30000 native soldiers. reports in yugoslavia develops cancer most what diagnosed with leukemia and brain to most according to various estimates between 10 and 18000 have died. a so called bulk of this and continues to claim lives. but nato still denies the detrimental and thinks of depleted uranium from a this is new care safety point of view. there is no radiological significant share or even in the or even and nothing is significant consequences. it may be in some very specific cases. for example, people very near a blaze that showed up in heat with these kind of munitions they inhaled the arrow falls that could be gummed as a result of that, there's could be a contamination bodies, more of a health issue of a normal nature than

a radiological.