a civil rights watch on tv. the send me some of the question of further deployment of medium insurance arrangements would be decided by us. depending on the actions of the united states and its satellite. we will determine the targets for further test of our newest missile systems on the basis of threats to the security of the russian federation. the russian president confirms moscow successful the hands of penetrate, targeting you'd prayed with a state of the art hypersonic. and as far as a lot of important says, key of being left, permitted to use western weapons to supply deep into russia, shows how the us and they to have to global security. and it's had issues. i emphasized once again that it is not for russia, but the united states that have destroyed the international security system. and by

continuing to fight and cling to their who gemini, they are pushing the entire world towards global conflict. mixed messages from the pentagon to which says, washington wants to avoid a war with russia, but we'll continue. it's military support. we don't seek a wider regional conflict. we don't seek war with russia. what we're focused on is continuing to support ukraine with what it needs the hello there. welcome to our team to national, reaching you from the russian capital. with the latest i'm around the world. i am michael pushed a, a lot of outputs in has had experimental, hapless sonic mess. all has been used to attack of military and dr. aside, a new train of the russian presidents specified that he was equipped with a non nuclear warhead. and he said the mess hall can travel as such a high speed that no air defenses can stop it in response to the use of us and

british long range weapons. on november 21st of this year, the russian armed forces launched a combined strike on one of ukraine's defense industry facilities. the combat conditions included the test of one of russia's newest, medium range missiles, systems in this case with a ballistic missile, with nuclear free hypersonic equipment. armies all engineers named it. originally, the test was successful. the goal of the launch was achieved. one of the largest industrial complex is known since the days of the soviet union, and which still produces missile equipment and other weapons today was hit in the city of the appropriate task. in ukraine. i repeat, we are conducting live tests of the original missile system in response to the aggressive actions of nato countries against russia. the question of further deployment of medium and short arrangements also would be decided by us depending on the actions of the united states and its satellites. we will determine the targets for further tests of our newest missile systems on the basis of threats to

the security of the russian federation. we consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against military facilities of those countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facilities. and in the event of an escalation of aggressive actions, we will also respond decisively and in the mirror in like manner as well. let's discuss this issue now here in the studio with arctic prospect and don't know quotes done is good to have you join me now. so this weapon, these describe this on experimental high bus on the mess. so what do we know about? well, dismissals called irish nick, or hazel and english, and it really is a state of the art weapon. as you mentioned, it's a hypersonic missile. it can travel at mach 10, it can, it can travel up to 3 kilometers per 2nd. that's a very, very fast missile and according to vladimir putin, this is a weapon that can be used to destroy any sort of defensive structure. there's really nothing that can intercept it in the sky. either just to give you an idea of how fast it can move, we've got this chart here, right?

and these missiles are typically launched from the cup posted in your complex on russian territory. and if in the theoretical situation it were to fly to london, it would take only 20 minutes when taking the added air to london. exactly. and as we're gonna see now, we can just for comparative uh for comparison, just if it were to go to warsaw 12 minutes. right. this is travelling at a speed of 3 kilometers per 2nd, right to berlin, 15 minutes and to paris. 20 minutes, just like london. so those are some really, really high speed and fast. yeah, exactly. earlier we spoke also with someone who knows more technical details about this missile. so let's take a listen to what he said. hypersonic boxed in. so that's about 3 kilometers per 2nd . so the missile cannot be stopped. the naked, i can even try to go so fast. is zoomed by somebody, i guess the it may pick up some kind of room that i need to speed just like i said

3 kilometers per 2nd. the missile has multiple launch has multiple warheads, somewhere between 1011. so is there a radically, all of those could be loaded with a nuclear, uh, and the nuclear explosion, more that can be used as several, the well launch vehicles that are nuclear tip and the rest as deep ones. but at mach 10, uh, there is no b, uh there is no uh, in the air system that can stop them. no hit any target, is there a net? and this is a 1st fuel test, but it is showing that its very cable it, uh, life is uh it hit small hypersonic speeds and a head start on target all words. so then is, there's really no doubt that this audition is a seriously affective and deadly weapon. but that doesn't mean that humanitarian considerations are going out the window either. i mean, when it comes to its application because lot them are putting also said that

russian forces are going to be warning civilians in areas that they plan to hit with this hypersonic missile before they actually carry out, strikes the use of course, choosing if necessary. and does the retaliatory measure targets to be hit by such systems as auditioning on ukrainian territory. we will proactively notify civilians and also ask citizens are friendly states who are there to leave the danger zones. we will do this for humanitarian reasons, openly, publicly, without fear of opposition from the enemy, who also receive this information. why without fear? because there are no means of countering such weapons. today, these missiles attack targets at the speed of mocked and that is 2 and a half to 3 kilometers per 2nd. the world's current air defense systems and the missile defense system of the americans in europe do not intercept such as science . this is impossible. we have always preferred and are now ready to resolve all contentious issues by peaceful means. but we are also ready for any development. if anyone still doubts this, it is in vain. there will always be

a response. all right, about the putting speech came out of the attacks in the coast region and 3 ask region where the, our tech comes and the storm shadows. now it seems this conflict is taking the global dimension. well, that's exactly what vladimir put and said, right. the provocation, the provocative action from the west, from certain western countries to green light. the use of these attack comes missiles on russian territory has given this regional conflict a much more global character. because these missiles, right attack comes, for example, they can carry either a conventional or a nuclear warhead, and there's no way that russia can actually understand what's coming their way when it's already launched from ukraine, heading towards the russian territory. so that's a threat of course for the whole world, and that's compounded by the fact that the united states essentially torpedo b, intermediate range nuclear forces treaty back in 2019, when it was the 1st party to pull out of it during the trumpet administration. and

this all collectively really is what i put in was talking about when he called the wes actions a serious escalation of the conflict. but we believe that the us made a mistake by unilaterally withdrawing from the treaty on the elimination of medium range and short range missiles in 2019 under far fetched predictions. step number today, the united states not only produces such equipment, but as we can see in the course of measures to train its troops. it does have worked out the issues of transferring that advancement sort of systems to different regions of the world, including yours and what is more, they are conducting training exercises on their use. i emphasize once again that it is not for russia, but the united states that have destroyed the international security system. and by continuing to fight and cling to their who gemini, they are pushing the entire world towards global conflict to all, i don't bring us up to speed with the international reaction to all of this. well, we've heard a few international reactions. it's been a bit of

a mixed bag but nothing really in terms of the severity of statements, nothing really taking a strong side. i mean, we heard a wishy washy statement from the you the use for an affairs spokes person who said that the european union is still assessing all the facts to come up with its position. we heard from the un secretary general antonio gutierrez, who said that it's worrying that russia's using its own ballistic missile right now . but on the other hand, we also heard from the presence of serbia, he said that the west has to be out of its mind. if it's going to green light, using long range missiles on russian territory and then not expect to evoke a response from russia itself and hungry, suppor administer also said that just the exchange of ballistic missiles, in general, between ukraine and russia's just a worry. some situation, i think it's safe to say that if it is a worry, some situation really uh, but probably the most worry. some thing about the situation is the fact that the west seems to be doing whatever it wants, closing its eyes to the consequences of its own actions. all right,

well wait to see how the coming day. so go probably that could be some consideration for sitting down us putting his set. we'll ready to and all of this and sit down to negotiate. but we have to go back to the table and look at all the tubs. don't course, i thank you very much. right to now the western media was quite to be asked to the develop and stating it's a warning of world war 3 and appears to be of threats to the us. and u. k. of the pentagon expressed concerns about russia loan taking that new hypersonic muscle now. yeah. for size that the while washington is supposedly not seeking a direct conflict with moscow, it will continue to provide supplies to kid above the u. s. department of defense and the from then confirm the russia ones. the us about the attack of the white house also accused russia of escalating the conflict. but dogs to questions about whether it was in fact, the us, which is to go to the escalation,

at every turn at every step is coming from russia. they're the ones who are escalating this. they're the ones who started this war is because of their aggression into a summer territory. ukraine. and this war can and today you hear, say this over and over again. it can't. if russia would stop the war and stop what they're doing with their aggression. so this is an aggression from their side. for a long time, the white house are using these long ridge type in missiles into russia to a type target and say russia would escalate, the war would be really been fight retaliation. so why now? why change the policy now? i'm not going to get into specifics. we're going to continue to be there for ukraine. this is a president that has led on making sure ukraine has what it needs on in the battlefield. we don't seek a wider regional conflict. we don't seek war with russia, and i think we've been pretty clear about that from this podium. and from this

administration, we've seen this type of, you know, dangerous, reckless rhetoric before from the president, putin. and is what we're focused on is continuing to support ukraine with what it means. the ukraine, as you know, has been successful in continuing to push back against russia and aggression. now let's discuss the recent events with 4 and the 5 and security expert from the university of elia calling. tell me you keep calling is good to have you join me now. so let's 1st spoke about the car and spike intentions that washington is pointing the finger at moscow for escalating the war. but moscow is pointing the finger with washington for allowing the long rigs dried. so who is to blame here? with seeing how, you know, the, by the administration as of the entity themself, allowing the, you'll say shop now the utah system from the us that we have seen the response by russian or the season response. and that's the message made to the us and request

that russians do have the full range of response options by the appropriation to stripe of not using you be able to give the okay and then rushes to the, you know, heavy debt to escalate. knowing data by then let me switch you on the wall, mount goods and warehouse. i've been using this transitional, beautiful problem comes the next you make it more difficult for travel to the fewest patients to, to make me for peace. i may be associated with us all the time this region, so it's a company that'd be sent as well. so he showed that russia, that's a wonderful the whole step from biden, to, to, to escalate it to escalate to the escalating approach and painted by those kinds. so i think with the, as was moving back with the, you know, higher tests on the west to increase in volume. and we shop the, you know, the, the stumble shadow results of the devious e m. s. at a higher boss. miss. solve that. yeah. being used now. so the question is how by the perceive the trash and mistakes on coding. and how do we use this leaving doc, but it does say on the next couple of months to ensure that, that, you know, do with the, the,

the best interest of the world and see the best interest of useful and need to industrial complex. and right now, the spotless strong reaction we have seen from the west, against russia using this weapons, president puts, in the said, russia wouldn't even need to have such arms if it wasn't for the us developing and deploying its own intermediate. read myself. is that a message that will be heard in washington and couldn't lead to any kind of negotiations? and i doubt that under the kind of industry should i that of course i will see it. i'll do that and they'll try, will definitely the on the idea splash to end is complete. and we have seen how he has managed to ensure these instability doing his 1st step and that you know, but it is a great be smile during the past. it shouldn't be that way, but if i missed which, as we thought that the case manager and to to escalate the insurance. and that is really unfortunate for, for him to do that. and, and we have seen how we will still gives trump decent one dish knowing that you'd

be more difficult for him to and to ensure that the us and trump, we have great the ration book in the home, just put in. what do you see? what's off the steps? yes. so you just have to put that measure and that the and the timing of august and i know 4 point to both the station of dismissal and the, the rightful pushing it by us being taken by 40 and disregard will send the right message to the west that russia has not been to the and so by then, and that's our troubles, to have the ultimate be no lavish and options. and then under the new opening for him to ensure that you have this negotiation leverage we've put in. and i'm hopeful that you can see what's always not sale of, you know, things we'll get back to for the mental team to ensure that both with not we'll so pain to the hands on find it and walk on this. and of course, it will help both the us and the young people conditions to ensure that this policy might see, you know, the like up to date, like right now malaysia has repeatedly called for a resolution to the war and ukraine. what role can quite

a lump of play in the escalating the conflict in finding a diplomatic path to peace as well? we have been really, she has to be invaluable themselves the completely to me to use because i never there and we are hopeful that you can continue to be on that were meant to be on the really in fact control efforts, beef the global soft, the brakes also leveraging what i'll need to shoot, we will seem kind of based and having long been subbing as the power balance between you know, the power, whatever else did you guys in china and disobedience? obviously asia, we also got the 2nd cutting to push for push will be the trusting, you know, lightning bolt proceed with the policy. so of course you also have the income from this region, especially when the police are assumed the temperature of last year. and that's yeah, and then good thing with the coffee does academic integration? well, presenting a higher level of support in de escalation atlas, of course, also to push for the stop more stressful. and the new section of this tight investigate missiles that will escalate conflicts that will escalate the know so we

did that in mind which will escalate the patients, the ukraine, but also we can get on the bus and it will, i will see the issue. we continue to push for the escalation was also pushing for our crashing partners from being to be just to, to kind investigate the the skate of this company. 9 to clean and also to push the last $2.00 to $3.00. evaluate, use response us. hopefully we do, you come across in this region, we can align, be multiple. see this one is all right, we have to living here. now calling is john new kid for and if us and secuity x, but something good investigative belie, i thank you so much for your time. thank you. now, early on my colleague rachel ruble spoke to form a pentagon secuity on the list. mike of knowledge of who says that russia has been forced to respond as washington never takes splittings warning seriously of the, by the administration. stress is it doesn't have a plan, does not have a strategic plan. it is a, it is a looking for ways to continue continually to put the burden on, on and putting,

and the end russia when it, when in fact it was us policy started in 2014 and, and end up tomato expansion. that drove good to, to do the special military operation. i think, i think the escalation is, is more psychological. even though the, the printer is reason the only because the west has to control the missiles. they're the ones who have the intelligence, they do the data entry and, and the maneuvering, know the of the messiah so. so there is natal participation and this is what's, what is appears to be the escalade story aspect of this, although they've been using the muscles for some time. yeah, michael, you really have a unique perspective and because there's sort of previously as a senior security policy analyst and the pentagon, so help us to understand why the biden administration made this decision to allow

the key of to use these long range missiles to hit russell because it, it had resisted up until the election and now that the administration was on the way out, the democrats have loss now of a sudden by the report of the gibbs, this green line. i think it's because of the loss. and the fact that it, this is just one more way, the democrats and getting back at the republicans and to trump it to basically lock him in on a policy that failed policy before he even takes office. this is basically an attempt by the democrats to set trump up for failure and has clearly stated that russia will respond to any escalation against his country. why don't western powers take him seriously? because putting says it's a a and then he does the thing and everybody seems to be surprised by it. why? well, take him since has been the history of, of the relationship between the united states and russia. they never took in

serious. they never took mr. brewton seriously. back in december of 2021. when he says you are approaching my red line, don't do it. you are a threat to with, with your nato expansion. your a threat to my, to, to, to the federation. i think the, the, the west wants to get beyond that. they don't want to, they don't want to be exposed as to that, if this was their doing an or on doing to, to, to do this by this nato expansion. in spite of half a dozen agreements that were violated called that, that established what they call into visibility. you don't arm the west at the expense of the east. and now this has given them a whole new life. and this supports the military industrial complex. this is, this is good for their, for their pockets and, and it supports their, their, their initiatives and it gives, gives nato now a whole new perspective. now they want to expand not only north to the arctic but, but also to the east and the japanese and the south koreans is what we don't need

that. so this is, this is very, very serious. and it's got to be nipped in the bud. and that's why the american people themselves are not for that's why they want to, that's why they basically voted this administration out and, and, and also voted against harris aust. laudermill puts in, makes the stock a warning to the west. so you can find more about that and the main points of the russian resident speech and not website r t dot com. now your ron has issued orders for the activation of new advanced uranium and reaching out essential features like homeless has and the angry response to being censored by the you and the new pill watchdog over its failure to cooperate. but to ron brundage, the western pushed the motion as destructive such an action at a time when it ran, and the aga were on the path of constructive interaction, proves once again,

that the 3 european and american governments are not at all honest in their claim of maintaining the credibility of the i e a and that a ron's nuclear issue is merely an excuse and a pretext for advancing their illegitimate goals. all right, let's get more on this. now i speak to r t. as you said, delilah who was joining me from to ronny. rodney, you said it's good to have you drive me now. so what do we know about the new resolution? of course, mike, the resolution was pushed by 3 european signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal. namely, the u. k. france, germany plus the west of forsyth. it's condensed. iran calls the all year to keep a closer watch on it was nuclear activities, of course. 19 members voted in favor 12 apps, the restaurant china and berkeley, now fossil for the only nations that works, of course, opposed to the resolution. the measure actually demands that it won't improve its

cooperation with the agency. it also costs for clarification on choices of highly enriched uranium, found a 2 on declared sites and asks for smoother access file for i. e a inspectors that there was atomic facilities. so if one has restricted this access since 2019 following, the west withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal and ups or the reinstatement of sanctions on it. one which came during the fonts 1st term. uh now uh it was, says this a new move and the adoption of this new resolution against the country. well, definitely backfire otherwise. i will. uh, uh, push the push the nuclear deal and the gc poway further into an address on what reaction has there been to the resolution by the new p a watchdog. the a lot of course are right after the i a past it's essential resolution. as long as

announced this talk a further with how the tories steps to significantly wrap up it's nuclear activities. they've now announced the launch of new advanced centrifuges. and again, the gas injection process into costs. we new generations of its domestically built . a set of centrifuge is just our moments after that resolution was passed announced idea of wanting an atomic energy organization at the fort minutes. we will use the statements. uh, they can definitely move, calling just a politically motivated, move on, realistic and counter productive. they said to other states and also red that they are wanting an atomic chief, had ordered retaliatory measures including the as i mentioned, the launch of a significant collection of new advanced centrifuges to one says these actions are within the framework of it was rights and obligations under the comprehensive safeguards agreement of the country also said that these measures can be reversed. if the west we considers its actions against the want. of course,

it's interesting that the washer was among the few nations that voted against the resolution. russia is a major party to the nuclear agreement assigns between iran and the walls towers back in 2015. and um, the brochure has always been critical of the west. it's non compliance with the court now at the board of governors session, which led to the adoption of the resolution, the russian. and boy, i once again warned that such a move will only escalate things further. some of the board of governors members deliberately choose the path of escalation. they sponsor the resolutions that nullified the progress between iran and the i a, a, and provoked iran into a tough counter measures to which it's cooperation with the agency will almost certainly fall victim the u. k. germany, france in the us do not learn from their mistakes and constantly fall into the same trap. how about yourself? best comes days after the i. e h. you visited you, ron?

what's the timing here? a mark actually grossly visited their want a week before the a board meeting and go. he was invited by juan as a good, well gesture to show that they're open for discussions and cooperation and they're ready to uh, sort out differences with the was that during that visit, how gross he also towards 2 key iranian nuclear facilities. then we've got tons and for the iran appear to be sending a signal call back then that it's ready to bury the hatchet and go back towards obligations to the court. and that's what was also signal during gross ease, joint pressure, with the iranian atomic chief inter wrong. we know each other well, and we know that it is indispensable to get at this point in time to some concrete, tangible, visible results that we indicate that these joint work at ease at improving the

situation is bringing verification to things and in a general sense is moving us away from conflict and ultimately will whatever, hosting and natural islamic republic of a rand during these years, as always, with goodwill, been on the path of interaction iran unilaterally. and with a goodwill on this agreement, had fulfilled all its obligations for one and a half years inside the j cpo. and yet it was the other party, the us that did not fulfill its obligations, withdrew from the treaty and did not allow others to cooperate. and imposed much more severe sanctions on the people and the atlantic republic of her end. so when he returned home grossi uh back, then seemed to be happy with the results of his visit to everyone. he said that during his trip they won't agree to respond to the agencies concerns related to the countries a boring of several experienced agency inspectors. and that it would accept the

designation of for additional experience inspectors are to go ahead and visit evans sensitive nuclear facilities of the country. also a short job the all yay. that if the resolution did not pass, then it would uh, abandon some of its steps including reducing get stockpile of the 60 percent, and which uranium would no longer enrich uranium of that purity level. but it's not all these calls while you're on the atomic watch doc. chair, shifted gears actually upon returning home and planned to approve the west proposal to adopt this resolution. all right, now, uh you said what's the context of this story now? because after all the was the us which quit the new pay a deal back in 2018. or of course of all the trouble began with the united states, the unit level withdrawal from uh, the 2015 to clear deal during transfer storm. actually uh the deal is uh,

almost 10 years old now it was signed between the wrong. uh and uh, 5 major uh, 5 major western powers uh, eastern and western powers bike, uh then a beer between one of those countries and back then it was hailed as a and a chief meant for diplomacy button. shortly after it hit a wall, it was actually signed during the obama administration. and when trump assumed office he, of course the union laterally pulled his country out of the deal and reinstated sanctions on iran. yvonne called this measure illegal and that it showed that the united states is not down to any international and multi lateral agreements back then go left to eat on the how many it runs. administration has fulfilled all its promises regarding the j c. p. o way. but today we are witnessing which one is the

country that doesn't respect international obligations about the j. c. p. o, a wasn't the deal between iran and the u. s. so that the u. s. could announce that it will leave the deal on the j. c. p. o, a was a multi lateral and international agreement. the j. c. p. o, a is approved by the un security council and has been endorsed by resolution 2231. therefore, america has officially announced tonight that it doesn't care for international obligations that won't efforts to try to revive the deal have installed since the recei administration. i won't under a position beyond once again showed welling that star to engage and talks with the west to try to revive the accord and go back to its obligations under the jcp away. but of course everyone is facing a tough task that had as.