the, the, the in the headlines right here with all to international there is russians, defends minister, adjusting his troops, and commending them for taking ukraine's best forces out of applied. saying that progress has disruptive kids in style campaign. there are no means of countering such weapons today. the modern air defense systems available in the world and the missile defense systems being built by the americans in europe do not intercept such marseilles have a lot of inclusion, right? that control the moscow has deployed. it stated the types of song it can be solved into combat because a salvo rate is down on a ukrainian, the military industrial complex out not send. kind of the west is responsible for directing attacks against the russia with his long range missiles brushes, entire capability has yet to be on least into the complex or will that according to

what pump ruffin defense official little. we think we have many types of weapons that we have not yet used from lasers to small arms. therefore, we have something to surprise the west with the bar so far, just off the 5 pm locally on friday, here and most go, we've been wall to wall with our top stores and updates. so let's get it rolling here. when i tell you we kicked off and use all with the russian ministry of defense reporting that us forces have taken control of the supplemental. the mutual sco that's in the next republic that such as defense witness. the address of the troops highlighting the work they've been carrying out on the battlefield is essentially decimated, ukraine's will fly from come or the combat. what you have done here. now you have crushed the best parts of ukrainian forties, and the fact that progresses accelerated. now, you have in fact disrupted their entire 2025 campaigns. and this slide, the west 3,

some green light for ukraine to use as long range must also strike russia most gross forces. i'm making strides all up and down the front right there. a map comparing control of today's battlefield bus is just the ones that go, according to open source data from the institute for the study of war. a russian troops have gained nearly 6 times small territory this year. then lots well, quote, western reckless actions won't go on on said that is the message from the president's folks person who commented on the russians launch was brand new hypersonic. miss a cute and i need to dismissal is not an inter continental missile. it is an intermediate range missile. the russian federation has no obligation to notify about this launch. but of course, the russian military will work out the mechanisms for a learning ukrainian civilians in case of plans for new ballistic missile strikes, are made messages that the reckless decisions and actions of the western countries

that produce missiles are much supply them to ukraine and then participate in strikes on russian territory cannot go unanswered in year to this website. and these describe that's on experimental high best on the message. what do we know about? well, this missiles called ition nick, or hazel and english, and it really is a state of the art weapon. as you mentioned, it's a hypersonic missile. it can travel at mach 10, it can, it can travel up to 3 kilometers per 2nd. that's a very, very fast missile and according to vladimir putin, this is a weapon that can be used to destroy any sort of defensive structure. there's really nothing that can intercept it in the sky. either just to give you an idea of how fast it can move, we've got this chart here, right? and these missiles are typically launched from the cup hosting. you are complex on russian territory and if in the theoretical situation it were to fly to london, it would take only 20 minutes when taking the out in the air to london. exactly. and as we're going to see now, we can just for comparative, for comparison,

just if it were to go to warsaw 12 minutes, right? this is travelling at a speed of 3 kilometers per 2nd, right? to berlin, 15 minutes and to paris. 20 minutes just like one and so those are some really, really high speed and fast. yeah, exactly. earlier we spoke also with someone who knows more technical details about this as hypersonic martin. so that's about 3 kilometers per 2nd. so the missile cannot be stopped. the naked, i can even try kind of go so fast. is zoomed by somebody, i guess the is a pick out some kind of the speed just like i said, 3 kilometers per 2nd. the so the has multiple launch has multiple warheads. somewhere between 1011. so is there a radically, all of those could be loaded with a nuclear uh, uh, the nuclear explosion. uh more that can be used as uh, several, uh,

launch vehicles that are linked where 2 and the rest as deep. but at mach 10, uh, there is no be, uh there is no uh, in the air system. they can stop them. no hit any car, get it there a. and this is a 1st fuel test, but it is showing that its very capable it life is its my percentage speeds and it hit start on, sorry. oh, by words. there's really no doubt that this audition act is a seriously affective and deadly weapon. but that doesn't mean that you mandatory and considerations are going out the window either. i mean, when it comes to its application because lot them are putting also said that russian forces are going to be warning civilians in areas that they plan to hit with this hypersonic missile before they actually carry out strikes. of course choosing if necessary, and does that retaliatory measure targets to be hit by such systems as auditioning on ukrainian territory. we will proactively notify civilians and also ask citizens

of friendly states who are there to leave the danger zone. so we will do this for humanitarian reasons, openly, publicly, without fear of opposition from the enemy, who also receive this information. why without fear? because there are no means of countering such weapons today, like these missiles, the tech targets at the speed of mocked in that is 2 and a half to 3 kilometers per 2nd. the world's current air defense systems and the missile defense system of the americans in europe do not intercept such as science . this is impossible. we have always preferred and are now ready to resolve all contentious issues by peaceful means. but we are also ready for any development. if anyone still doubts the as it is in vain, there will always be a response. you're putting speech came out of the attacks and the cost region and pronounced region with the top comes and the storm. shadows, not, it seems this conflict is taking the global dimension. well, that's exactly where vladimir putin said, right? the provocation, the provocative action from the west, from certain western countries to green light. the use of these attack comes

missiles on russian territory has given this regional conflict a much more global character, because these missiles, right attack comes, for example, they can carry either a conventional or a nuclear warhead. and there's no way that russia can actually understand what's coming their way when it's already launched from ukraine, heading towards the russian territory. so that's a threat of course for the whole world. and that's compounded by the fact that the united states essentially torpedoed the intermediate range nuclear forces treaty back in 2019 when it was the 1st party to pull out of it during the trump administration. and this all collectively really is what i put in was talking about when he called the wes actions a serious escalation of the conflict. for that, if we believe that the us made a mistake by unilaterally withdrawing from the treaty on the elimination of medium range and short range missiles in 2019 under far fetched predictions. step number today, the united states not only produces such equipment,

but as we can see in the course of measures to train its troops. it does have worked out the issues of transferring their advanced masonic systems to different regions of the world, including yours and what is more, they are conducting training exercises under use. i emphasize once again that it is not for russia, but the united states that has destroyed the international security system. and by continuing to fight and cling to their who gemini, they are pushing the entire world towards global conflict. bring us up to speed with the international reaction to all of these. well, we've heard a few international reactions. it's been a bit of a mixed bag, but nothing really uh, in terms of the severity of statements. nothing really taking a strong side. i mean, we heard of wishy washy statement from the use for an affair spokesperson, who said that the european union is still assessing all the facts to come up with this position. we heard from the un secretary general antonio gutierrez, who said that it's worrying that russia's using its own ballistic missile right now

. but on the other hand, we also heard from the presence of serbia, he said that the west has to be out of its mind. if it's going to green light, using long range missiles on russian territory and then not expect to evoke a response from russia itself and the hungry suppor administer also said that just the exchange of ballistic missiles, in general, between ukraine in russia is just a worrisome situation. i think it's safe to say that if it is a worry, some situation really uh, but probably the most worry. some thing about the situation is the fact that the west seems to be doing whatever it wants, closing its eyes to the consequences of its own actions. one of my only a guest in this program was for me i've had to go on senior security policy chief and michael maloof. and according to him, he says, the use of the alteration nick missed all. it was a clear message to the west, but some like ukraine. savanski doesn't quite get you got to distinguish between what the latest one and what the people want. and what i'm concerned about is that these people are out of control. the elite us are out of

control. and mr. hutton has been very steady and staged in his responses. and this was a response to the west escalation. i don't care what the white house says, right? i, i saw it with my own eyes when they, us, and the in the u. k. a set their, their, their missiles, which they had the program which they had, and they had to actually manipulate who was, and they tell us, it was a nato sense. yeah. and consequently, and mr. putting in warranty against doing that even beforehand. yeah. and they didn't believe him. so now, by the, by signing of this particular kind of missile is sending a very strong message that you don't know what we have in our inventory. and it is suggest to me that he has other things that we the west may not even know about it, but also it was like, you guys cannot stop what we have and we will do the civilian population just as

will tell you guys to get out of the way. yeah. and then we'll take out these military facilities. you know what i just don't understand. there was some guys in the west to it like all this is no big deal. i mean that there is there a truly some lunatics in position the power in the west right now, but the populace people, i think that freaking out, i'm seeing the commentary online. michael, but just just quickly want to shift gears ever so slightly here. and you know, when the, when the west was closing his embrace using key over the last 24 hours, the alarm was raised about, you know, that somebody coming from russia's zalinski actually focused on persuading the public that everything was normal. everything was calm and you don't, you don't have to do anything just for a 2nd. haven't listen to savanski headphones, little bought them today. they will also have notes and questions about some kind of particular den. just ask you the information for engines that took place today. with some panics and messages fast around all of these benefits on the rush hour. please take care of yourself those simple, the armies and be especially careful that no one of many plates your notions for their own advantage here next summer. yeah, so these are international embassies,

are vacating that getting the people out of key at what he's saying, that when everything's, everything's okay. there's nothing to see. well, he's, he's delusional. and he, he still doesn't understand that the war has already been lost and, and mr. prudent is doing a measured escalation in response to what the west is doing, as i said earlier. and he's, and he's showing his seriousness. people are alarmed, they don't want to war, this is and, and, and there's, there's no explanation for why we are in the position we're in right now. yeah. great. there, there is. absolutely no, no, uh, uh, basis of we've never, it's never been explained what the national security a period of, of, of ukraine even is to the west or even to the world except by some fanatical near cods in the united states in the west that wanted to isolate russia and, and, and try to and isolate china. but in doing that, we actually brought the 2 together on the roster as a foreign minister, also commented on the western reaction to russia,

striking back. so get off or offset it struck feet or into ukraine's leadership is the by the ministration is clearly separate charging trumps upcoming to ok so, so you have to ask for the reaction to our response. as i understand zelinski was scared. he began to accuse this host of leaving him unarmed in the face of such an action from russia. well, this is probably a useful result because at least it's closer to reality because to feel it on your own skin, i would say probably about what to expect from biden and his outgoing administration in supplying the a tax. and allowing the british and french to use storm shadow and scout missiles. of course, there was an element of leaving as much of a bad legacy as possible for the next administration. the democratic party apparently has it in its blood a lot, a respect for the former as us on a non commissioned officer, thomas pen was on the show. he commented on the lens keys, reaction to rosters, deployment of the hypersonic miss alice directly into the combat. so i would not

hesitate to believe that he was scared. i mean, that we've seen the video now, some of the video footage of those, you know, where his impacting and speed at which with the, you know, they, they moved is just incredible. i think it's something like like mocked in uh it just does this new weapon i think is uh was, was the right choice to use it this time was just an extension of politics by the manse. and i mean that's stuff. that's where we're at now. and i don't see what else one sides gonna have to back off or, you know, then kneel down or, you know, we continue and i don't see how it stops, even even under a trump administration, for them. everything is on the line here. we're talking about the entire dollar base daughter, and i don't think in washington that they, they are going to stop and anything we had the opportunity to speak with the russian to state. do my defense official notes to the new hypersonic miss solve that i was deployed by rusher is designed to carry

a nuclear payload and the west need to take note because right now it's working on very say nice. you must sort of service mode. it was a very convincing demonstration, and not only that, but it was not that they attacked us, but we retaliated, the president said there would definitely be a response. and that is exactly what happened to you. what mistake do americans make? they're always trying to make one dare something that is they are told there will be an answer. they say, well, let's try it. the criteria of truth is practice. well, all right, we have demonstrated to you that this will be the case more over, they should pay very serious attention to this answer. what is it about? the 1st of all president vladimir putin said that this type of missile is capable and above all designed to carry a nuclear warhead. and it can reach not only the territory of ukraine. the fact is that nuclear conflict can happen very quickly. and then it may be impossible to

stop for americans, a slightly radioactive ukraine, or even europe may seem like an acceptable thing to fight for against russia. another question is whether the united states will be able to stay out of it. they are really going to provide missiles, nuclear warheads, and serious weapon systems to ukraine. what does the approval for key of to strike our territory? mean? it means that an american, british, or french unit are sitting there calculating how to target the territory of the russian federation and looking at our air defenses. figuring out how to bypass them and so on. that's the point. ukraine is part of a larger game. it is the most visible intangible part, but it is only one part of a much larger conflict with the west. if you crane were to wind, it would not mean the end of the conflict. the confrontation would continue, and it would continue until our leaders meet with those of the west, like trump, to establish new rules for the future like 1945 yalta conference for decades or

even centuries. we have many types of weapons that we have not yet used from lasers to small arms. therefore we have something to surprise the west with. there is a lot to do. the west has nothing opposite except for the aircraft. carriers that can be destroyed by our hypersonic missiles. unlike the united states, which has nuclear warheads in germany, italy, in other countries like ours, are only located on our territory and bella roofs. however, we were made to place them in bella rouge to protect our brotherly nation, which is absolutely right. by so trumps were times of the white house, the people he's bringing with them. for example, a drain the swamp. we thought about shaking up the establishment of bringing about big change. it's all the on the legislation of going on the ground to action with tennessee speaking with the well, the namesake of the jimmy door show. it's going to be showed in full tomorrow here, or not a, but for right now, a clip of what's in store. what about for all,

would you said about trump? what about these a pix? will they follow trump sort is naco rubio, marco rubio. famously, mike wald speak to exit, volts is national security advisor big said the trump plan was to take the handcuffs off the long range weapons we provided to ukraine. one of your thoughts as these appointments have been announced, i don't know. ruby os family left cuba under batista. so there's no way i use either way. i what he has a poster check of our own as well. i'm not sure. i know. i mean these people are clearly neo guns who don't support. uh the piece that was talked about by trump at least well it seems to me that marco rubio at least was um uh that was that was a gift or pay back to sheldon natal since widow who gave a $100000000.00 to donald trump for his campaign and um,

it seems like um he will uh, you know, he is weak even though he is. uh is, is history has been neal con, i'm pretty sure he voted against the last round of funding for ukraine. um, and it seems to me that he's there, he will be, you know, um, carrying out the trump, whatever his wishes are. so the trump policy, it seems like that marco reveal will be there to do that. the same thing with the secretary of defense um feedback, you know, again it's, it's, yeah it's so it's, it's, it seems like these people are there to serve trump and trump ivy. and you know, he did get a mandate to end these wars. he was an anti interventionist. this is why the stablish one hates donald trump in the 1st place. the reason why we had the russian gate, as we called in the united states way they choose to non stop being compromised. a treat here to our own country and working with president what food and,

and the russia was because that was the only card they had to play because he got elected on the ending are for it. more is our intervention is war is our region change. wars the world as i'm looking at 30 minutes of stop wanting to the west, have a look online because a student says what's going on now is change the underlying nature of the conflicts . get all the analysis. so the russians president's address right now, re between the lines that on to thought on for now, here on the program, the international criminal court has, as you know, by now arrest the issue to arrest warrants for the is ready. probably minister is full. my defense minister alongside a hamas come on to their old charge with war crimes and crimes against humanity of us. so was asked to comment on the development, but said it doesn't need any legal opinion to outright read checked the decision. how can you reject the what's been presented by a legal body, one of the highest,

you know, it's an international law court. how can you reject this if you don't have accounts or legal assessments? what is your, is it a political rejection? and if you don't have a legal assessment, we've rejected the court's decision. but that doesn't necessarily mean that that has to go through a legal process. we can reject decisions from the court that come down in various forms. and we're in discussion with our partners, including israel, next steps, but i'm just not gonna have more for you. uh, good word, solid right. the meantime the i see case against them. you know, and you'll have guidelines as based on the charges of crimes against humanity and will crimes committed over the past year or so. however, the israel has rejected the accusations, adding that the quote was given to pressure to defend its citizens. according to the ice age, these founding rome statute old 124 member states are obliged to arrest individuals that have been issued a warrant. however,

both as rather in america and north parties to this list. some countries like the netherlands, kind of a switzerland island, italy and spain have said they will comply with the obligation even the outgoing e u foreign policy. which even though there's the entire european block to respect the war. and while i was speaking all day with the palestinian and a median, a professor who notes the warrant, just the 1st real time the is right, the government has been called out to take responsibility for attacks. this is the 1st time they did not shoot communities through. the ice is the challenge, the gemini, of such an imperialist, i did you like the americans? and that's what they said as an occupying or the price that they've been seeing. people have faith is so high and gear with the ongoing general side that gaze 1st thing guys don't do us bank and you service of them. but we look at this decision as something that is symbolic, when it is the 1st time and that the readers in is read are being exposed and there

are one sided, s them re hope that this could be concrete, dies and implemented. and not only as it just should be. busy in an actual to be implemented to say, we know that the organic relationship between this a, them do not say just like it got click manage, there is no the voice via the, of course the americans would put pressure is on the i see to this in this decision and to put pressure on other countries with joe from this signatory, all the rooms that you it's so as you know, they could give protection. so in that then the, i want to get on the far away to tear on where iran has issued orders for the activation of new advanced uranium and enriching centrifuges and comments. as a response to being censored by the humans, nuclear watched all the claims it's fail to cooperate. so now it's at, ron has rounded the west side like motion quote, disruptive such an action at

a time when it ran. and the aga were on the path of constructive interaction, proves once again, that the 3 europe in, and american governments are not at all honest in their claim of maintaining the credibility of the i. e a and that a ron's nuclear issue is merely an excuse. and a pretext for advancing their illegitimate goals. the resolution was pushed by 3 european signatories for the 2015 nuclear deal, namely, the okay, france, germany plus the west of forsyth. it's condensed iran and calls the all yay! to keep a closer watch on. it was nuclear activities, of course, 19 members voted in favor 12 apps stage one, restaurant china and broken off. also were the only nations that works, of course, opposed to the resolution of the measure actually demands that it won't improve its cooperation with the agency. it also costs for clarification on choices of highly enriched uranium found to, to on declared sites and asks for smoother access file for i. e,

a. inspectors that there was atomic facilities on what the reaction has there been to these the resolution by the new p, a watch dog. right after the i a past it's essential resolution. it was announced. i'll just start to further what time you tore steps off to significantly wrap up. it's new to your activities are they've now announced the launch of new events, centrifuges and began to guess injection, processing 2 spots. we new generations of its domestic. we built a set of centrifuges. of course, it's interesting that the washer was among the few nations that voted against the resolution. restaurant is a major party to the nuclear agreement assigned between iran and the walls towers back in 2015. and um, russian has always been critical of the west non compliance with the court. now at the board of governors session, which led to the adoption of the resolution, the washer. and boy, a once again war that such a move will only escalate things. further of some of the i,

a board of governors members deliberately choose the path of escalation. they sponsor the resolutions that notify the progress between iran and the i a, a, and provoke, to run into a tough counter measures to which its cooperation with the agency will almost certainly fall victim the u. k. germany, france. and the us do not learn from their mistakes and constantly fall into the same trap yourself. best problems, days after the i e h. you visited you ron? what's the timing here? go see visit iran a week before the a board meeting and go. he was invited by give on during that visit our gross, he also toward our 2 key iranian nuclear facilities. then we've got tons and for the iran appear to be sending a signal back then that it's ready to bury the hatchet and go back to its obligations to the court. and that's what was also signal during cross these joint pressure with the iranian atomic chief inter wrong. we know each other will. and we know that it is indispensable to get at this point in time to some concrete,

tangible, visible results that we indicate that these joint work at ease at improving the situation is bringing verification to things and in a general sense is moving us away from conflict and ultimately, will whatever hosting in the actual islam of or public ever ran during these years, as always, with goodwill, been on the path of interaction iran unilaterally. and with the goodwill on this agreement, had fulfilled all its obligations for one and a half years inside the j cpo. and it was the other party, the us that did not fulfill its obligations, withdrew from the treaty and did not allow others to cooperate and imposed much more severe sanctions on the people in the atlantic republic of a ranch. when he returned home grossi uh back, then seemed to be happy with the results of his is. that's what i want. he said

that during his trip, everyone agreed to respond to the agencies concerns related to all the countries, a boring of several experienced agency inspectors. and that it would accept the designation of for additional experience inspectors are to go ahead and visit yvonne's sensitive nuclear facilities of the country. also a short job the i yea, that if the resolution did not pass, then it would abandon some of its steps including reducing its stock pile of the 60 percent and which uranium would no longer in which i uranium at p already level. what's the context of this story now? because after all the what the us which quit the new k a deal back in 2018. for of course, of all the trouble began with the united states, the union level withdrawal from uh, the 2015 to peer deal during transfer storm. actually, uh, the deal is almost 10 years old. now back then, it was hailed as a new chief meant for diplomacy, but shortly after it hit

a wall of it was actually signed during a b o bama administration. and when trump assumed office he forced, i unilaterally pulled his country out of the deal. and we stayed at the sanctions on iran, yvonne called this measure illegal and that it showed that the united states is not down to any international and multi lateral agreements were left to eat on the how many it runs, administration has fulfilled all its promises regarding the j. c, p, o, a. but today we are witnessing which one is the country that doesn't respect international obligation as the j. c, p o, a wasn't a deal between iran and the u. s. so that the u. s. could announce that it will leave the deal, the j. c. p o, a was a multi lateral and international agreement. the j. c. p. o, a is approved by the un security council and has been endorsed by resolution 20 tooth free one that he would therefore,

america has officially announced tonight that it doesn't care for international obligations. any agreements, any effort, and the plan to try to revive the cord hinges on the western countries um effort to try to convince everyone that the united states would not abandon video under a different administration. and that remains to be seen how this planned to try to revive the accord will go ahead given this new trouble that the west has created. or just as so many developments or some very heavy top storage you today here on how to, to national i appreciate you sharing your time with us here at the mothership in most go your program guns for times the .