and this guy goes to the u. k. a contract don't leave in the country. i'm not the residents in, i'm not a u. k. citizen. the only connection i have to the case that i have is digital. and i go in and out from time to time, i have an event or fellowship or something. it's not a jurisdiction or have any connection with whatsoever. i mean, i do, and citizen, every time i was resident in gunner and was low as he goes he goes and excuse me, you can let the judge interprets jurisdiction to mean that um, any seat and published on the internet that is visible through previous residents that the british quote has jurisdiction over it, which means that effectively anything on the internet is now we've been be to restriction of the british libel courts, which is absolutely incredible for just that. because essentially what that means is that anyone, anywhere in the world, publishing stories about events in their own countries involving your own, you know, a national, this has nothing to do to use it the, the big faces were,

need purchased, the position needs it for then see among lane cold people to take to the street. so mid failed talks with the authorities. a warning you may find some of the images ahead, disturbing. the low security forces vehicle was still running a protest in the streets as you sold the. the money store, though to have survived that, people on the street spoke to rhodes in disrupted transportation in the capital, the rights in moves, and people cooled by the countries of position last month as a claim that the presidential election was rigs. early this week, the country's outgoing president calls the talks with the off position, but one of the 2 main lead is declined the invitation, the while everyone believes in something. and while the russian

orthodox church is normally associated with states in east and in southern europe, people are increasingly turning to the face on the african continent. we followed the journey of canyon orthodox priests and challenges. they even counted all listen more in new episode of africa. within a quick preview. i mostly patasha on down. my gosh, i'm priest. this is my jack of industry. i know freshman for the next jack. don't punish illness, auto and disciple flashing. i would wish that i can judge continuous beep and deep into the african according to sale bill pressed to save the judge. fundable most may be, it is a good plan. they offer coordinate brush and nice choice

because we're not the we are additional people. we are the so the lunch hour, but i will see you in one. so 2 minutes, the the hello and welcome to cross talk. we're all things are considered. i'm peter lavelle . joe biden is in legacy mode. he has less than 2 months to leave his historical mark to be remembered for being unfit for office and being one of the engineers of the palestine genocide, to cap it all off. we can add kamikaze joe playing

a game of new killer chicken with russia. the rest, sucking vitamins, legacy, i'm joined by my guess, wilmer leon in washington. he's a political scientists author and a radio talk show host in seattle. we have sarah bills. she is a former u. s. navy service member, a geo political analyst, and one of the hosts of the geo politics. and in montreal, we crossed the angler. he is a canadian foreign policy institute fellow, also a journalist as well as an author. alright, comstock rules and effect. that means you can jump any time you want, and i always appreciate, sir, let me go to you 1st since you got up early, as for the program, much appreciated in seattle. and i was thinking about doing this program sunday morning, my time, which means much earlier than the western world. and by the time i was putting it together, the sunday shows happened in the united states. we had people like michael waltz and the sebastian gorka. oh, good gorka, whatever his name is, he's we,

we need to be referred to his doctor all the time i realized. and then, you know, everything is, is, is um, goes into collision. i mean, what is the biden administration trying to do exiting power? what is it trying to do to the trump people, and do the trump people seem to be going along with it. can you one ravel all of best because this time last week? is it biting this, trying to sabotage trump? it seems like the incoming trump team seemed to be in hand in hand with the outgoing administration as well. i think that with trump, he's not too concerned about anything. geo, political or moral. it's more about his evaluation of december decisions through a business ones to me you cry and looks like a bad deal. but i think he's waiting to hear the terms because the united at the end of the day, the united states has funneled over 100000000 dollars into this conflict with no and then side. so do we leave with and kind of like our wounds and kind of cut our losses or do we continue?

and what's the influential voice is like you one must girl, and joe rogan, are also in his ear, an ample sign, public opposition, which sort of makes you create a $5050.00 for the trump out. and then i would think, well more, what do you think about it? because sebastian, go to, i don't, it was a given permission to go out and say, the bombastic things that he did mean he came out on the sunday shows more bombastic than anyone in the but a bite in ministration over the last 3 years as well. i think what this demonstrates is we have a tendency to think in binary terms as though it's biting versus trump when in fact, this is american foreign policy. and trump being the transactional type of individual that he is. he doesn't really have a grounded ideological world view. so who knows what in the world he's thinking? and on the bite and side, i think what they have decided to do is compress their timeline. the things that they were planning to do, say in february,

march or april. now that they're on their way out. they are trying to get all of this in probably by the end of november or the middle of december, trying to be sure that they box the trump administration, into a militarism that it least as it relates to ukraine and russia. he'd probably rather not do. but again, i think we also always have to remember it's american foreign policy. it's not necessarily wedded to or dictated by a particular administrator. well, it's a good point, even montreal. so um, let me see if i get this straight here. we have a failed bite and policy when it comes to ukraine. they just wanna make sure trump's policy on ukraine is just as much a failure. that's what i'm getting from here. go ahead. if a yeah, i don't know. they considered a failure. they, they see a fight and to last ukrainian is the potential success. they see the,

this is weakening rocks is still and they see lots of profits to the military industrial complex. so, so i'm not sure that their assessment is exactly uh our assessment. but, but i think that there is, it will be a certainly a feeling for ukraine that's, that's, that's for sure. and uh, and it's potentially, increasingly, it'd be a failure for all of humanity with the, with the asco split tori, the decision. but uh, but clearly, i mean divided ministration with what they're planning to do a what they've already done and planning to do it within $6000000000.00 more and arms of damage. and so we're trying to send their they, they think this, this can keep going for a long time and they think that i think not incorrectly, that's a truck. may just, you know, more or less continue along the same path with whatever dangers that has for ukrainians and, and for the world. you know, sarah, in a,

i think was 2 new cycles ago. and then new york times in an article about the situation that with the exiting administration and the new administrator and coming in because casually mentioned that, you know, there's, there's pock within whitehouse circles, but maybe giving nuclear weapons to ukraine is a possibility. if it was mentioned in such a casual way and say, well though it could be kind of problem magic and complicated. i mean, this is insanity. and it wasn't the headline. nobody was talking about it on the table, but it was in print to zip. this is just another one of these options here. this is outraged sarah. i just feel like it's a way to for washington to kind of wash their hands and absolve themselves of this situation. kind of leave name or europe with the bag or europe with withholding up uh, the, the nato, mary, or the nato foreign policy out there. we also have to remember, trump loves a good narrative, so she could utilize this as a project or kind of as

a propaganda or a moral victory. he could allow joe biden to continue playing chicken with, with uh, russia and putin. and then when he comes in, he sort of unravel all of this and, you know, i'm the peace maker. i find that, well, i know, but sarah, sarah, you know, we, it's often said, you know, a week in politics is a lifetime 5 weeks. what is that? okay, i mean you can, you can causative norm is the amount of mischief in the next 5 weeks, wilmer and washington. that's what i really worry about because we, we, we finally got the official word that the, the, the ukrainians can shoot in nato weapons. american, british, french, using nato forces personnel intelligence to strike into russia. then the russians responded with their hazel miss, always, they're calling it in english. we're in the middle of something, we're not of the end of something. go ahead. no, this, this could very well be the beginning of the end. and i think it's also important

to include in, in your, in your explanation here that you're now hearing more rhetoric coming out of europe . limone is reporting now that the europeans are talking about war. the europeans are talking about european business must prepare now to be on a war footing. you've got this dutch add more rob bower. i step step uh say, saying these types of jingle was taking this, this militaristic rhetoric. and now they're even trying to flip the narrative and say that rush just is weaponized in energy seeming to totally ignore. it was called what the north street pies, one i think is what the united states blew up. so there's, there's, there's this whole battle of the narrative which tells me that they're trying to

shift the focus. they're trying to shift the basis of reality. so the people i guess are trying to prepare folks for an escalation of this conflict and that it was just one other quick point. they seem to be confusing, the restraint of russia and the restraint of china with fear. and that is a huge mistake because i don't know the president, she is bluffing, and i don't know the president put in his bluffing. well, if i mean i hear that that's a, a theme, but it's often on this program is the battle of narratives. i mean, um, you know, but it's fine. that's a, it's another word for propaganda. but if, if, if you're basing your decision making on narratives, you can it good find yourself in a very bad place. what about reality? go ahead eve. yeah, well i, we see that here in, in canada indicating government, we see a, they have completely bought into all of this stuff they've stated about. this is

the 1st time uh, european wars are being changed. this is a moral crusade. this is all, no, no, no. the former yugoslavia was the 1st time since the 2nd world war. the reporters were changed. of course i need. oh this is natal convention that's taking place in montreal. this, this week was big protests for, uh, 334 days over the weekend. and, uh, the, the, they still claim this as a defense of alliance all over the defense of allies. and if they didn't bomb, it'd be as if it didn't war. i've gotta stand obviously, yugoslavia so, but they, this is, this is popularly believed and i, and i actually have been just to, to go my mind to you believe this, i don't, i'm sure who some of his advisors know this is just rhetoric but, but the, the the narrative is basically in canada for instance, it is over whelming, there isn't old descent of any sense that we up of august and we did this press

conference on monday here outside of the end of this nato, a convention. and this reporter for the last past, the one of the corporate daily shows of and he, he just could not accept that vladimir, who was the devil and we, every thing is on the blood of it. why don't we put, natal hasn't played any role in any of this stuff. and so, um, even with all of the horrors that we're seeing us in canada, by, in a, in guys, uh, they still basically believe that nato is just, uh, they know of us with just these little bit angels just trying to, oh yeah, i mean it's, it's sarah, i mean, is it just let me check here? i mean, i, i live in moscow. i mean, i, i haven't heard that. russia is lobbying missiles into canada in the united states and the united kingdom. but nato is doing that in its own technology and weapons are of our heating russian installations. i mean there's, there's no parity here. i'm just commenting on what you've had to say. i mean, i'm who's a war with home. go ahead sarah. it's clear what's going on,

and since we've even been on here, there's been a confirmation from the russian ministry of defense about those they've had, quote, call them ballistics prior. but in the quarter scrooge and those were actually attack, them's long range missile. so this is a confirmation of an escalation, so it's very clear that nato is up in the game and i wouldn't have been there. you haven't seen muscles in the united states and canada yet. yeah. so yeah, i mean, it, it's really interesting is that to this day, may co claims it is not involved in the conflict. it's really quite extraordinary. i mean, it's got nato written all over it. ok, well we're going to talk about how this works out for ukraine. after our break. after that break, we're going to continue our discussion on biden's foreign policy legs. we stay with our team. the look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a

robot must obey the orders given by human beings accept. we're so shorter to conflict with the 1st law show you alignment of the patient. we should be very careful about our personal intelligence at the point, obviously is to make a truck rather than to the various jobs. i mean with artificial intelligence we have summoning the theme and the robot must protect this phone. existence was alexis, the welcome act across stock were all things are considered on peter roosevelt. true manual are discussing biden's foreign policy legacy. the

okay is go back to wilmer in washington. what all of this pastoring that's going on . and i, i actually looked at the calibration, what was going on in canada over the weekend. and again, narratives count, but reality is most important in the reality for ukraine isn't highlighted enough. i mean, all of this is technically in ukraine's defense for its protection. but ukraine is, is getting smaller and smaller, more and more ruined, and more and more of its troops. do not want to fight a gallop poll, not a ukrainian poll. not a russian poll, a gallop poll, that says over 50 percent of people pulled. want this conflict to come to an end, but lindsey graham says it's going to make america rich wilmont it's, it's funny you mention that because as you were speaking, my thought was obviously nobody polled lindsey graham because he doesn't believe he

test simple. he that narrative. um, this is, this is, i think, really one small chest piece in, in the brzezinski is grand chess board. and it russia that ukraine is kind of the, the test bed. it, it really now doesn't appear to be the president prudent, who has this grand vision of bringing the band back together and reclaiming the former soviet republics. it seems to be the united states through nato, trying to de industrialize europe and trying to use uh, european countries as new markets for american energy. and this is just the 1st um yeah, but uh again, that's a very interesting argument and it's been around for a while. but it, it, there is some flaws in it. okay. yeah, americans want to, they want to capture european markets. but if you cut off and

a cheap energy supplies, then those markets are less valuable. the people are poor and they won't be able to buy this stuff. do you want to send them? i mean, at the, at the, at the base then i, i agree. what i'm just saying is that this is, this is often mentioned here, but europe is not the winner and you're not going to get the consumers that you want, at least from the american perspective. i mean, it, it really is a self defeating in many ways. i mean, obviously the in the united states, what state? well right now, and like one of the biggest outcomes of this whole complex is how subservient europe is become to the united states. i can remember when the europeans had a different position on, uh, your rack on palestine, all of that is evaporated here, which makes it more dangerous because they're just going to do with the american say they should do. you know, if one of the, you know, the, there's a new military base and they told me it military base in poland. the russians have

already said they could be a target if this escalation continues. i believe the or yeah, i believe them to. uh, but i do. i do. uh, basically believe the washington has been, uh, successful on the level as of warranty. uh, western europe to, to it's, uh, control and i think that, that what we see, you know, the, this needle proxy or has, has really helped in that. i don't believe that i don't believe this business about ukraine being really valuable for resources. and not that being a major motivation i, i do believe that subordinate, the west of europe to us geo political aids is, is a success. and you're right. i mean, you know, you, to the extent to which they've all gone along with backing of the genocide, jose, uh, whores and guys, uh, uh, is, is an indication of that. uh and obviously also this sort of kind of where to send

troops to ukraine to differentiate talking about this is all just kind of lashing out there. they're realizing how much they've been kind of boxed in france and others have it boxed it in terms of following us policy units. it's actually pretty, pretty embarrassing and, and i also really dangerous the fact that they can't seem to get out of a, out of this. but so, so in that sense, i think the u. s. has had some high, some major successes. again, so the to a terrible, horrible for ukrainians. and i also think it's bad for french and the more well, you know, what we, you know, we still hear these ridiculous talking point is it's the save and protect ukraine's democracy. well, there's no democracy there. it hasn't been there for a very long time with a it's calling card is corruption. this war is made the corruption, even worse. so, you know, sarah, you know where the europeans, but they get to elect officials about tom. this war they've never been able to

given, given that opportunity they, they will take out people that support the war. i mean, democracy doesn't even work in europe when it comes to this. oh, absolutely not. we've heard on the lena bear loc mentioned that we don't care about your opinions, we'll do what we want. and then we're starting to see sort of this for vast form between western europe in eastern europe. and we can see exactly how to both mentioned the how much under control west, such as the central and western europe are under the united states of america. it's pretty interesting to see. we know that all world world start with germany, a rise in germany and relationship with russia and this one is no different. and they, we, you guys have mentioned the energy north stream and all of that and, and everything was just to put western europe back under the, the american system. yeah, it was the cape, the well, in this case you know, that was the old frame rates during the cold war. keep the russians out, the germans down, and the americans in, well,

it's to keep the russians down and out and keep the germans down and how it in the americans. a likely, i think that's the new and that, you know, water has nothing to do with audiology. i mean, all, you know, most of us here with our, our young female gets here, but the rest of us are children of the cold war that we believed it. okay. but apparently that isn't true anymore. okay. never was true, apparently warmer and it's interesting. the new doctrine that the russians have come out with is it expanding its nucular doctrine, a non nucular, a countries that are supplying, being supplied with weapons by nuclear power now can be targets. and i, and i'm only giving my own personal opinion right here. but since the british are so loud mouth, about their participation and all this, i could well imagine when are there basis to get a get a call when say you got 2 hours, you got a clear out and your article 5, you can explain it to your own people, you're still gone, know the kill russians with your missiles. maybe the russians will return the favor

. go ahead. invoke article 5. i don't think your people good to go along with it. go ahead and washington. well, i don't think that this whole needle article 5 d o is really frightening. anybody for anybody particularly in, in russia, and just to piggyback on a, on a point that you, that we were engaged in a little earlier. that never under estimate the blindness that attends arrogance. and what i think we're seeing here is in, in is an arrogant west. and the be the european elite have, i think, are in a different space than the europeans. and the european people are the ones that are going to be really big, victimized in the vista radio. it's when these muscles start flying, they are the ones that have to go into the street, and they are the ones that are going to have to take control of their countries. and because of the parliamentary systems in many of these countries,

it'll be easier for them to do then to do awfully that we have here in the united states. but once these muscles start flying, i think that's when the european people versus the european elite are going to start pouring into the street and saying, we've had enough of this, but only i really imagine, i really hope that would happen. but let me go to eat here. i mean, these public's are so propagandized, you know, it'd be, you know, they would appear as morgan had the most ridiculous debate on his podcast. i hate to even kind of promoted, but it was really just ridiculous. no historical references are made the mince process, nato expansion. i mean, these audiences are so propagandized, they have no facts to grapple with and it, and, and because you want to be popular, you just go along with what the, the powerful say, i mean, this is a real challenge of, of informing people that's the purpose of this program actually go heavy i,

i completely agree. i mean, you know, i think it's probably not quite as bad in some of the european countries as it is in canada for instance. but it's, it's absolutely started the, the math, vast majority of people who claim to be even informed. pay attention to the issue have literally, they don't even know what made the court was i, i interviewed politicians, i ukraine of as a politician from a left wing party here and come back. and he literally did not know what i was talking about. yeah. and he's come out, he's on the stage where bit of back you came to the end of this kind of rhetoric. you just don't really know how to start in dealing with that. so the, the political structures mean principally the media in this make it incorrectly difficult to, to overcome that. but you know, it is possible. and i do also think that one of the things we're seeing here in montreal like this opposition to israel genocide and guys of which has been really

significant. while we saw over the weekend with the nato summit, as we saw people who been mobilized around how this time broadening their, their, their views and taking on nato. and we have the 1500 people march on the data assignments. and, you know, some windows are broken and stuff like that, but it was a, it was, you know, so successful sense that there is some broadening of, of consciousness about, you know, imperialism pay for our policy. the question of nato, will that be enough that the political structures into europe and the people are able to, uh, you know, break free from that before we, we delve into something incredibly horrible. i don't, i don't know. but um, but i think that there's no doubt that people are just completely propagandized on the, on all these issues. you know, a, a, i'm sorry, sarah, in looking like again and made reference to about the, the sunday shows. and how well um, bombastic uh, these trump appointees are um, you know,

just kind of very general question. i've asked it before on this program, and i think it's worth asking again. why is it seems like every time americans vote for a president, they end up with john mccain. a good dose of john mccain is the he, you know, he, the stench of, of john mccain will never go away as long as the c panel is likely. yeah. okay. one minute sir, allows me to make sure i was just reading the extra about color revolutions. and i saw john mccain, and then i looked at george and i was like were member, be rid of this man. so it's funny that you say that he's back again. so yes, the john mccain, it's the unit party. it's that john mccain was such a great example of how the 2 parties sort of overlap and 10 kind of votes for it and work together in foreign policy. so i love that you picked john mccain because he was sort of the middle of the aisle god. well, i mean, but let's see what see when, you know, when there's bipartisanship in washington,

that's means you have to grab your wall with close your bank account. and run out the door because with these people, they only get together on the most evil things. okay. john mccain was that he was evil incarnate. okay. it's truly amazing. and i couldn't wrap guarantee, you won't have to finish right now, but i can guarantee you will be talking about his ghost for a very, very well got. that's all the time we have. i want to thank my guest in washington, montreal, and seattle. and of course, i want to thank our viewers for watching us here at our tea. so your next time, remember, perhaps uncles the the,

the, the 5 in the background. this is across the morning instead of ready to actually see far agreements of correspondence, reports on the grinding day reaches lebanese to billings returns the news. along the way. i demand that the is really enemy fully implement the ceasefire and withdrawn from all territories and positions that occupies our people, have the right to return to their lands and cities and to live in peace and divided administration reportedly twice to squeeze out another $24000000000.00 from congress to spend on the crane conflict house despite home during

a majority of americans are gave sending.