to the plato says, the line should not be considering a peace plan for you. great is what in said, be focused on sending more weapons, but q again, the alliance demonstrates they can never entertain plans for peace and stability as well as security for all in the meantime. as long or content the, there were plans that to, you know, or discussed almost openly to board. so bridges naval base,

us on the seal as of cry me of was i do, you know, i'm dreaming about creating and they to base and train me it and so on. and so for us, we want to look we, we have been very friendly, was getting when, for example, over night the friends came back to the years of preparation for world war 2, when they were best allies. so should law then all these folders new trinity old is friendship, going to sound that took us a blank look at the of all this disappeared overnight. so maybe this was the put in the cards and the new thread. it was murdering them. and nice, just the name for the i don't know. they're mad about the winter war. that's

totally possible. can you negotiate with zalinski? you've pointed out that he has exceeded his term. he's not, you know, democratically elected president of ukraine anymore. so do you consider him a suitable partner for negotiations, a portion of the rest of this issue as well, many times in the september to $1020.00 to during the show steel, the special with the ration zalinski. and she is a conviction that she would be dictating the terms of the situation. also to the list, she signed the degree pressure between the negotiations was put into the government . and when uh, during public events, after that is a fortune is ask why rush, she's not the phone you go. sions. he said,

don't turn the upside down. we are ready for negotiations. provide that that will be based on the balance of interest tomorrow. but zalinski science is degree prohibiting negotiations and 1st authors. so why don't you tell him to cancel it publicly? this will be signalled up. he wants negotiations. instead. lillian speaker in front of his piece formula later, it was in addition by the victory plan and they keep saying, we know what they, what they say when they meet with europe in union and the best of those. and in the other 4 months, they say no, do you on the list, the deal is on know, with arms, the, and the i mentioned to you the, the, the blending the 2nd sunday on the basis of this peaceful. mueller.

and they, they don't shy away from saying we will invite the russia to print to, to vote in front of it. the do, the leech, we agreed already with the us. and well, uh well no less than $200.00 sometimes say nothing about your brain move out with your brain. even the fix to this implies that any thing about the dresser without, with rush. because they, they discuss what's kind of condition. so we must accept by the way, recently they already do violate the basically the, the concept. nothing about your grade was though to create their buses, their messages they know our position well,

not playing level game. what, which in the now and stage the goal of our duration each sphere is fully in line with the united nations chapter. so it's the full, the rights language rights, minority rights, national minority rights. 30 just the rights. and this fully in line was boy a c principle. there is an organization for security and cooperation in your official still alive. and the, the submit of this organization will several submits of this organization clearly stated that security must be indivisible, that nobody should expense use security at the expense of security of others. and the most important, no organization in the, your atlantic space shall claim done in us. this was less time. it was consumed by or you see to 1000,

then as nato was doing the executive offices. yes. so we have, we have legitimacy, you know, you know, position no need to or no door to steps because only a see, you know, i agree to that. these should not be the case if, if it starts us and police are still there, right? so for us is, who do you think has been making foreign policy decisions in the united states? there's a question in the united states, who on the yes, i haven't seen the new blinking for 4 years. the 2 years ago, i think that the judgment assignment was that the in the room was somewhere in the modules and dimensions. he's used as a assistant, i was there presenting points and then p as i system came up to me during that meeting and said that the new ones to talk just for the minutes. i left the room, we shook hands and she said something about the need to deescalate and so on

and so forth. so i hope he's not going to be hungry visit me since i am disclosing this, but we were meeting in front of many people present in the room. and i said, we don't want to scroll a if you want to inflict or did you defeat the one dresser? she said, no, no, no, no. it does not. it does not start to judy feet low, but it is only in the train you've not spoken to him sense. so have you spoken to any officials in the body ministration? samsung language on through in the academy, but have you had meaningful conversations? no, no. a lot at the like when, when you know, when i met in international events, one the end of the person who may know

a lot in the american then. yeah. some of them say so low. some of them exchange few words, but i never impose myself because there's nothing meaning it's behind these incoming config just, you know, when they see it. so when somebody sees and american talking to me or your been talking to me, your opinions running the way when they see me and during the less is you to into meeting. it was ridiculous. grown up people, what you people, they behave like like you so childish and unbelievable. so you said that when in 2016 in december, the final moments of the by the ministration biden made the relationship between united states and russia more difficult. uh rather, my boss suffice for us. exactly. i'm so sorry for the bottom ministration left

a bunch of bombs, basically for the incoming trump administration in the last month since the election. and you have all sorts of things going on politically in bordering states in this region. that you know, in georgia and roost in romania and then of course, most dramatically in syria. you have turmoil did. does this seem like part of an effort by the states to make the resolution more difficult? there is nothing new, frankly, because of the us. so historically, uh, in foreign policy. oh, as much as a to by making some trouble and then to see you they can fish and the mother what the iraqi aggression lead be in the venture or we were needing the state basically a fleeing from

a gun. his style now it's riding to get back to the back door using the united nations. so you know, to organize some of the event where the u. s. can be present in spite of the fact that they left off the understanding very bad shape and the rest of the money and don't want to, to, to, to, to give it back. i think this is, if you, if you analyze the american foreign policy steps adventurous, most of them is the right towards me that's, that's the, the better a better and they create some trouble. and then they see how to use it in georgia. the, you know, in you when the is the spell a, a c, money at doors,

elections when they use the money at their elections in russia, they will do is be a very negative. and another country says a little bit later was cuz that's the least i'm in georgia the the one year during commission, the for the see present that the positive freeport and that is being ignored. so when, when you need uh, endorsement of the procedures you do, it's when you like the results of the like, if you don't like the results, if elections, you ignore it. it's like when the in light of the states and the other western countries organized a union let through the declaration of independence of coal. so they said, this is the, the cell determination being implemented when

a few years later and there was no order for them. the men cause unilateral declaration of independence of by the way off to that, the serbs approach the international court of justice. we should write that. well, normally they look very specific, you know, in the, in the judgement but their role that uh you and your lead through a lot of the when bought the for jerry 30 degree is independence. as it does not necessarily to be agreed to is the central authorities and few use slates of great means were holding the rest of them, but whose invitation of many international observers not from international organizations, but from falling into areas in europe, in asia,

in the associated space they said no, we cannot accept this because this is a violation of territorial integrity, right? you know, you pick and choose the you and chat. there is nothing menu. you have to respect that then the and all it's inside. so what, who's paying the rebels? you've taken parts of a level, is the assad government in danger of falling? what is happening exactly in your view and serial will we have the we, we share the, do you run this crisis, start that, then we have to organize the us, the process of russia dorky and iran. we needs red julie, and the end of that meeting is being planned before the end of the year or the next year to discuss the situation on the ground. and the,

the rules of the game used to help the syrians to come to terms with each other and the to prevent, to separate this threads from, from, you know, get installed. that's what the americans are doing in the east of syria when they grow. some code to show a separate use using the profits from oil in the green. so we should, they are the resources for each day. ok, but this us on the form of is a useful combination of players if you wish. and we'll have very much concerns after this discrepancy was a live point surroundings. nice to have the conversation we is the darkest means so

far and this is and was uranium colleague we agreed to, to write to me this week. did you see it coming? hopefully in the in the margins of this international conference, we would like to discuss the need to come back to strict implementation of the deals on easily area because easily days correlations all was the place from where the terrorist moved to they can level and the arrangements reached and threatened to 19 and 22 inch provide for with turkish trends to control the situation in the due date escalation. so and to separate the say up the some form a new set up from the position which has no terrorist on the beach go through. right

. right. it is of historic. apparently it is not yet. it is not yet the another deal was on the opening of the m 5, a route from the moscow store level, which is also nowadays and completely by that there is. so we as mean just as a foreign affairs, we'll discuss the situation. hopefully this coming friday and they meet at 3 or 4 all 3 countries on the security people in contact with it shortly as long as groups the terrace you just described who was backing them. well, we've have some, some information and we would like to discuss what is, although this in these and this process, the way of the to cut the general. so for, for financing arming them, the information which is being flow that then it's

in the public in the public domain mentions of the americans. and the breeds among gathers some people say that is a real is interested in, in the, you know, making this situation that the rates so that does a, is not on the very close stretching. it is a complicated game. many, many if there's a involved in the like hold the context which we are planning for this week. we'll help stabilize the situation. what do you think of donald trump? i met him several times when she was getting new things to be supported and when she received me twice, i think even be overlooked is when i was visiting the full by little dogs.

while i think she's a very strong, there are some the some who wants the results a cool doesn't like so. procrastination on the sink. uh and um this is, this is my impression. she is very friendly in the, you know, discussions and about this does not mean that the that she's pro russian. this some people to write to present to you the amount of attention. so we receive them to the front, but ministration was very, very, very beat down the only respect any, any choice which is made by the people when they vote in the respect the choice of american people. and we opened this page and

said, we are open to context, we is, we have the and the open old will, it will no longer we is the government administration and we hold that. so when the by them uh, when the trump, uh, even though you rate that we will understand what the bowl is, which and so there's on this side we never cv, are though content. so with dice, you know, you're going to need 3, don't secure it to you, and then your sink in my final question is how we sincerely worried. are you about an escalation and conflict between russian, the united states, knowing what you do? well, we start up with this question to more or less we, it seems the central question yes and the, the european say that it's not the least, but we spoke to each other,

but this is not for the landscape to dictate the terms of the do. it's for the us and the russia. oh, i don't think they should be presenting go relations as uh you know, to guys decide for everybody. not at all. it does not. that does not though style. we prefer the mentors which during the nathan breaks and some psycho operational being is ation where the you and shut the principle of summer and the quantity of states is really important. the us as not to use the respects the southern and the quantity of states. the united states, you know, when they say we can look below the russia to be in the new crate, because this will undermine our rules based on the door. and the rules based, we'll build these americans immunization. know,

by the way they door, at least on the by the letting me especially use i ink. uh oh, the in the your asian continent. in young. the pacific strategy is of the south china sea, east china seas already or nate origin. nato is moving infrastructure that our goose building the core tubes in the pacific before they call it a japan, australia, new zealand, south korea to us. so scary and japan building new the 3 alliance with some nuclear components. so and the stilton, the deform, most of the secretary general of nato said, oh, lusty of to be submitted to reach a she said you're to atlantic security is indivisible, from in the pacific security. when she was asked uh, does it mean that you go beyond the territorial defense?

no, no, no. it doesn't go beyond sorta total defense. but to defend though it's your daughter, we need to be present the this element of pre emption is more and more present. but with the united states we we don't to, on tor was any but and as i said, nuclear 5 nuclear states declared that this the, the adult level in the january 2022 that we don't once confrontation with each other, that we shall respect each other security interest and concerns and it also stated so new clue was a nuclear, what can never be one and the 4 nuclear war is not possible. and the same was

the read the rate. it's by literally between the russian that united states put in by them. when they may have to enter into one in geneva in june, basically they reproduce the statement by rig. and then gorbachev of 1987. i think no new clue war. and this is of absolutely a, you know, a vital interest sunday cold that this is also in vital interest of the united states. i say, so, because sometime ago, mr. kirby who is a white house communications coordinator, or whatever. he was asking the questions of answering questions and remote escalation and about the possibility of nuclear weapons being unemployed. and she said, oh no, no,

we don't want escalation. because then the, if there is some nuclear element, then you oh your, it be on the lice. would suffer. so even mentally she excludes the 9th of states kind of stuff. and this is something which, which makes the situation, it'd be 3. so it might, if, if this means that it's a prevails, then some reckless steps would be taken, then this is but, so what i think you're saying is american policy makers. imagine there could be a nuclear exchange that doesn't directly affect the united states. and you're saying that's not true, that's and that's what i said, yes, you know, but you know, the professionals in the durance nuclear deterrence policy, they know very well that it's

a very dangerous game and to speak about a limit that the exchange of for nuclear strikes is an invitation to disaster, which we don't want to have shall ever i'll thank you very much. thank you. the, to take a fresh look around as a life kaleidoscopic, isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures, design to simplify will confuse really once a better wills,

and is it just as a chosen few fractured images presented to this, but can you see through their illusion going underground? can the russian states navigate as tight as one of the most sense community invest in sun set up the, in the system must be the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on the rush has proved inc. s r t spoke back, keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube tv

services for the question, did you say steven? twist, which is the after the end of world war 2, the national liberation movement. it'd be an intensified dramatically. haven't driven away the japanese occupiers to the vietnamese patriots by no means wanted. the return of the former french colonizers flood brands did not want to lose the rich colony and decided to beat the opposition by board. in december 1946, a full scale war broke out. the main victory addict organization weighed by o g means inflicted heavy losses on the french. the invaders were in raged.

according to western historians, up to 250000 lives of peaceful v and these were on their contents. the colonialist widely used the practice of mass rape of bethany's women. as revenge on the gorilla . in 1947, the french destroyed the village of knights rock, murdering 170 women, and 157 children. however, terror did not help. in 1954, the vietnamese defeated the french army, and the decisive battle of again being full, almost 12000 french soldiers and officers, including the commander, general de categories. and his command staff were captured, that ca, visualization of a huge garrison at a demoralizing effect in europe. the french left vietnam, but they were replaced by even more violent and much stronger invaders. the americans, hard times, were awaiting vietnam. again,

the bulk of the wall claimed and ruined the lines of tens of thousands, but it was the hague tribunal, with delta of finishing flow to the less unexpected. i know it was that i will talk to him all that will cause of the curious, i mean them was that the rest of your stuff or some which in the funded 13 as minimum or just send me the ok up on these. you betcha so mutual block that's to the because of the to eco, so a toyota table, a cousin built around what sort of on teams so, so this would eventually go for something to bed. jane stuff says i've done this for the bus. they have to go into your stuff as i so the so not quit, only needs to cover the problem. first i noticed was that some of

the, the, [000:00:00;00] the hello and welcome to cross stock were all things are considered. and peter lavelle, nato says the line should not be considering a peace plan for ukraine, but instead, be focused on sending more weapons to the queue. again, the alliance demonstrates it can never entertain plans for peace and stability, as well as security for all. in the meantime, the slot are continues, the