of is already pursuing a very aggressive foreign policy. thanks for taking us through all of that or to correspond to i'm to see a lot of great stuff when they, i was supposed to be the brief level are no bias here. it's just a computer operating system after all. right. well, it housing quite worked. i'd like that with me comes fast, becoming the norm. next going underground asks the sooner attendance. you're welcome back to going underground, broke out single around the world from the u. a. e. after a year review, k u s u, i'm genocide, and nature defeated its proxy,

war and russian through ukraine. the global economic landscape is transformed. most of the world now looks optimistically to the new bricks while due to as western european economies collapse and the us on the trump reported the 6 to retrench. but what about one, take the logical danger, the good end, not only the livelihoods of most on the planet, but life on the death itself. jim regards his back to give us a warning, detailed in his new book, money g, p, a. i and the threats to the global economy. he's the best sending economics to all of our former pentagon and us intelligence adviser and current editor of the financial newsletter strategic intelligence. he's going to be a game from albany in new york. jim, thanks so much for coming back on. we're seeing the horror of uh, hey, i own welfare is millions of threatened bites in this region by the u. k. u. s. u armed weapons. so what is money? g p t, in the title of your book, outlining a threat to perhaps bigger than the threat 3 c o u and ukraine and goes yes, actually that says exactly right, we're in the finance around the idea of

a chapter on actually nuclear. we're finding, but the point is, you know, a, i artificial intelligence of course, to be john or to a pre trained transformers should be to use just as subset of a i is the part that's called the tension. lately you can give it a prompt, it'll, it'll rather say already, but by the way i should issue, i just claim i actually wrote this book. it was not written by a computer. uh, by the, by computers can do that in a lot of college kids are using it for term papers and so forth. so it's quite a lot of good, especially just a subset of, of a i and the, the, the book is not bash a i saw that they are dashing exercise. theirs is very powerful. there's lot of good that will come out of it just in the pharmaceutical space. um, you know that the, the biochemists okay. no, i killer combination. so it could treat or assure certain diseases, but there are billions of them and a lot of smart people in the room, a lot of equipment could only come up with so many. but official intelligence

applications can do far more far faster. and actually they've produced some combinations that look interesting. so some good is coming out of it already. and i, i talked about that just very briefly, but that's not what the book's about in the book i stick to my lanes, so to speak, which are a capital markets banking and national security. so i look at a, i is applied to those 3 areas and make the point. there's nothing new about a i, it's been around as science has been around since the 1950s, as logic has been around since aristotle. i'm in a nurse or sicilian soldiers and mrs. luke looks like a couple lines of a computer code as a matter of fact. so, um, you know, mary shelley's frank and sign that was the frankenstein's creature was arguably in the early ninety's center. so. so it's been around, but what's new is that the processing power is much, much faster because in video and others and a and telling others just these, some of the cartridge ships are orders of magnitude faster than what's come before

you need a lot of electrical power as an issue, but even though you supposed to reopen nuclear power plants are 3 mile island, so they can have enough electricity for all the computing power. but the 3rd thing, and probably the most important is what's called the training set. so these are, these are learning models, these, these are models that are capable of learning facts and making connections on their own without the developer having to, you know, download the information or create the code. well, what are they going actually, jim? quick detour from him and, and tell him a get into the work, isn't that you explain in those language models that they use? i'm sure i have a whole chapter on that on biased censorship and contract violation where it can try to. i should just eventually we're for lying, but it's the kind of line where you don't even know your line because you don't, you don't know what you're saying. but uh, but the best part of it is as well. and make the point that i show your training

on materials. okay, what are the materials? we'll see internet basically, you can buy the entire internet as a bb pages, or however many a lot of developers don't need that much. they buy out, however many terabytes they need, but when they but the computer is a going through that they're looking for words that associated with other words explaining what the call clusters or clouds. and then when it produces speech or writing, we're just output it. it, it can, it's kind of speaking or any language really, but it can speak, you know, in my case, english pretty grammatically or some of the output it's, it's not bad. but the problem is, it can't think there's nothing intelligent about artificial intelligence is on that . one of the problems we make is we have to have more flies that we because it can talk and have a pleasant voice like siri or. alexa, we, we think it's our friend, it's not our friend is just, is just a bunch about. but having said that, recently google unveiled their g p t app. it was called gemini,

and one of the users, uh, early user put in a what's called a prompt, which is a question. and it said, please give me an image of a pope. and the computer came back with 3 images of women and people decimals and astronomy. um and then another user said please give me an image of a viking and it came back with an african liking. well, i happened to be catholic and i happen to know that there have been 266 pups in 2000 years and they were on that. now whether you think that's a good thing or bad thing, we can take that to the bar, but it's a fact that we've had 266 male pups, no female pups. if you've been to scandinavia there for scans and blonde, there are, there were no african vikings in the year 1000 a day. so it was. so people say, well it's malfunctioning, it's producing, you know, kind of garbage out, but they need to go back and fix it. and even the circuit brand came out. so yeah,

we kind of blew that one. that's not true. it actually function exactly as waves designed, and that's the point. there was no bug, you know, buried in, in the layers of the model. it had a feature called prompt injection. what's prompt injection, will you give it a prompt? and instead of giving you a straight answer to a straight question, they will embellish the question to meet some politically correct will work goals. so for example, as you say, give me an image of the pope and the computer reads it as give me an image of a pope in a world where there is no sexual discrimination. everyone's treated equally well. if, if that's the question you're going to get some female tops. but there was a question. uh, same thing with the viking. you know, obviously give me a biking. it'll say give me a viking and a world where, you know, all races come together. come, they said, well, you might get a black liking, but the point is, it's not it's, it's functioning perfectly, but it's not responding to your question. it's responding to an embellish question that incorporates, woke up activism. uh, you know, cetera. i mean,

those are humorous examples. those are humorous examples, but i mean, in scholarly research, this is catastrophic prison. i use a, in the book about the ukraine essay, which you quickly identified is probably a result of jack g d in foreign policy magazine the, the catastrophically poor a journal that the c i a and diplomatic walks uh wants to, uh, quote from right. well, well, you're right, i mean the examples are very successful, but they're the real examples. but sure apply to anything applied and i make that point. so who are the gatekeepers on g p to who are they? who are the gatekeepers controlling the output? you or i, or anyone else or any serious atlas we get using g p. j. what all we know, what is this is open i, which assembled as a private company, but it's microsoft now that which is facebook alphabet, which is google, apple. and just a few other is a fire 6 gatekeepers. now,

what's their track record and coming up with the truth. well they, a lot of are covered the a lot of the about nass, which don't work. they lied about the vaccines, which are not, vaccines expand, not experimental to g modification therapies that also don't work that a lot about the war on ukraine. americans still think we're winning, we're me where she's winning decisively and the nato back to kind of forces are losing a reference later at 500000 to the average americans. typical americans don't know that because our media lies about it, including google search results and a lot of our climate change. so you have people, organizations start with the google, but the other ones i mentioned who have been lying to you for 5 years or longer, about climate change to warn you. crane, depending demik and a lot of house. but all of a sudden we're supposed to believe them and you be so my point is they belong to us all along the gate keepers on g b t. i would be extremely wary of taking anything there comes out to your place

value and then just add to that. if you happen to be a subject matter expert, you can probably spot the fall. so it does like that. but there was an example where you kind of turn that in a 2nd. you can probably see the spot, the fall. so, but if you have to be a subject matter expert to spot the fallacies, then what good is it in the 1st place. but the real danger of the people who are not subject matter experts who are relying on it for good information to have been propagandized propagandized by the output is just then one of many flaws and problems with the system that i do. i point to the example you're on ukraine's that, that you could refer to, it was foreign policy magazine and they did kind of experiment. they created 2 essays, you know, fairly short, 900 words on the origins, the warren ukraine. one was generated by a computer gp to the other one was done by a bright high school student who are somewhat knowledgeable. and they were publish side by side anonymously. and as a reader, you were supposed to look at them and see if you can pick the robot. i take it in

one set like 170, so that's the robot. and then i read the rest of it about the other ones that as a student and i was right, but it was nothing was easier because it started with cliches one after the other. and you know, i'm a rider. i mean, you don't likely share as i used to occasionally, because so few of them come in handy, but it was cliche written, but that's how a computer i long use the word thing. so sorry, computer process russian aggress looking at things like that. yeah. was it was, well, exactly, i was looking at a 1000 articles on ukraine and to see certain cliches over and over. it assumes that that's how you write a, so i have good writers, right? but that's how it computer might, right. so it was very easy to spot, but so there, there are 2 problems. number one, why said, of course it was easy to spot the robot for the reason i mention, but neither the robot nor the student got it right because they completely ignored the 2014 food i taught the 2008 declaration, you know, 2008, george bush said george and ukraine. she joined data 6 months later putting invaded

georgia. um. okay, so were you not paying attention? did you not understand that you had crushed the red line? you are threatening versus national interest and the 2014, the c i a and then my sex reineke, who deposed a duly elected leader. okay. maybe wasn't the most honest and popular guy, but he did when an election. and then 2 months after that put in to the crime yet. so i was what, what part of the red line do not understand, but they kept going and they kept going. and that was not mentioned in this as a really started with the special military operation in 2022. so a, the work was deficient by the human and the robot because it didn't really get to the, it was, and the, the role that was easy to spot because it wasn't a very good writers. so it's hard to tell, though, i don't know whether you know, your child cvt because it's giving southwell to assess here autonomy no invading georgia. no,

but this is the point we can argue about different points. but if the eye is giving this information as a tooth and gospel based on lies, then the whole world is run on life. sorry to interrupt. i know we have to get through so much. you did mention open a life, which i didn't know it's to be called close day. i have i multiply by you present. we are usually relieved of a trump big tree. then as regards the law must influence the helium us cuz pointed to the dangers of this. hey, i technology before we get to the themes in your book. i mean you're going to tell me with these written radio, but i don't know if you're honest with it. i don't know if the jump is rather, but i do know i'm in touch with, you know, people in the transition team and uh yeah, it's, uh, it's created some interest. i will say a few things are more of nauseous and tired of yourself on the back. but i my newsletter the week before the election, we said donald trump jump in the past. we're going to, when we said donald trump is going to get $312.00, a lot of those, including michigan, $54.00 sentences and $224.00 house seats. the actual result was $312.00 electro

about so we, we now that you have started landing $53.00 sentences. so okay, off by one and looks like 222 houses off by 2 of 435. so is literally the best prediction in the world, you know, people like, uh, uh, uh, yeah, we need silver and the new york times and the others were saying too close to call the economists said the counselor's going away and you know, etc. so you have to deal with all of that, but we got to exactly where, but that's because we're using a better models, you know, so you get more, i q points rated to be a better models, you're going to get better results. so, um, yeah is, is a, but is a great outcome for the united states and my view that everyone's have, we're just going to go to a break though. we'll get that's amazing result to generate guides of stuff to you that more from the phone i've had to get advisor best selling all their money g, b i and the threat to the global economy after the spring. the

look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings except we're so shorter is that conflict with the 1st law show your mind. anticipation for should be very careful about personal intelligence at the point, obviously is to trace to us rather than seeing the various jobs. i mean with the artificial intelligence, we have somebody with them and the robot must protect this phone. existence was on the exist, the

welcome back to going on. the ground is still here with the advisor and best selling all the money gti and the threat to the global economy. jim reco, it's jim you are talking to me about how your modeling showed who is going to win. this is presidential elections better than anyone else on us. i do want to get onto armageddon. i keep interrupting, is there so many themes in there? a while i can, i've got to go to have mentioned the nuclear threats. you're a big fan of. charles sound is p s and the russian lieutenant colonel status of petroff. uh yeah. so what do you do? the $983.00. just explain those 2 names and that significance in the book into a lives. sure, i still have a few chapters on the capital markets and market crash and banking panic. and we talked about the bias, but i have a chapter on the national security, but specifically about nuclear were fighting. now i started studying if we were

fighting in 1969 and that was based on the works of scholars mostly done in the uh, in the 19590 in 96. these it was a albert and the roberto most other. and that's a henry kissinger, but maybe the biggest brain was charming tongue. and harmon con no basically said, here's here's on typically where is it gonna start? nobody's going to wake up on a sunny day. so nice day think i'll fire off a nuclear weapon. he developed what he called the escrow tory louder was actually 54 step louder. and you said what happens is to antagonize one's or something. provocative the other one response, you know, in a more aggressive way. the 1st party, you know, raises the and you keep going, getting more more violent or, or confrontational, and you don't realize it. you're climbing the escal joy louder. you are climbing it ladder towards nuclear annihilation. by the way, they were to die. and i was in the world today right now that are following the

pattern that herman con, outlined in the early ninety's. sixty's one is ukraine. so again, without revisiting the whole history, you know us as sponsors occurring 2014, put and takes crimea. we get weapons to ukraine, food and engage the done boss. we start signing, bradley fighting vehicles and havens tanks and attacking dismissals and patriot missile batteries and where she comes back with them. can you on there? so cypress sonics drones and a lot more. again, if you can debate to where we can take that to the bar, but my point is that there's an escal joyce hasn't though there's no question about that. same thing in the middle east. again, starting with the, with the massacre on october 7th, 2023. israel and those guys are a possible outliers, missiles, israel taxes belong around. and israel start shooting at each other, the hudy's clothes, the red sea, and m. as soon as you know, again, take sides, are you the geo politics of it? but there's no question that you're on an escal atory path and there are nuclear

powers all around us, russia, israel's nuclear, a nuclear power around. it's not far away. and so you're on exactly the dynamic that kind of scale. you know what, what was cons, advice, cons, advice, that 1st 3 steps 1st step, recognize you on the walk. don't engage wishful thinking. don't pretend other words you are on that also the toilet. never to take a b stock. number 3, climb back down, deescalate find a way and back down that ladder so you don't get too close to nuclear annihilation . and of course, the cuban missile crisis was a power dynamic case. now, between today, when we're on the ladder and 9062, when we climb down, there were 2 cases in the 1980s. one in particular, um the russia actually had and will show you and you have the time, but basically rush it, they had 2 forms of primitive a i that we using ai at the time and it has system coding. oh go. and it was designed to detect incoming us ballistic missiles. and one day it is 19 a 3

a day. and actually gave a launch signal is cuz the, the worst bodies treasures launch on warning when the other side shooting it. you don't wait until the missiles land wants your muscles right away, so they're not destroyed on the ground. that's called launch on wandering. so this gave a lost signal. now, lieutenant comstock petroff was so the signal and his orders were call his superiors moving up a chair in other words. and that could very well have resulted in the soviet union firing. this was up to us, but he had worked on the system. he knew it had flaws, and he saw that there were 5 muscles coming in. and he said yourself, well, if the us were attacking the soviet union or russia, they wouldn't send 5 muscles. they would send $200.00 missiles. so it must be a mistake or false. alarm turned out. it was, it was the sun hitting the clouds on the certain way and reflecting in the radar and triggering of false alarm. but he disobeyed orders. he does not cause seniors. he wages out that his life and his country that he was correct and he was and later

became known as the man and save the world. another case, so just be brief. there was a us, a need, a war game going on at a time when the cage u. b. had concluded that if the us got sufficiently far ahead of russia, they knew that were head. but if that gap wide and the r saturday, you know, economic military said her superior already to a certain degree, they would be very likely to fire the best they do. and if we were attacked, while the were getting that nato was conducting was a nuclear attack, it was a game that was what they were simulating. and the case you be saw that they completed was a front or sham for an actual nuclear attack. they were getting their bombers read either missile silos prepared. and then it was a lieutenant general uh uh, the troops in the us army who saw this and de escalate here the word game to take, you know, take a pause and, and stop further action. the caves you be picked up on it and they,

the escalated and that was that. so the point is we had 2 near nuclear wars and the 19 is why didn't we bought a new blue world? well, currently try to kind of touch off a pen, lieutenant general. uh, cruise i relied on uh, guidance. they relied on their got their rent tuition commonsense. they disobeyed orders, they were so countries that they felt it was the right thing and they were right. but my point is a, i cannot do that. that's called add. dr. blodgett again we, we, we've had inductive logic. you know, since david schuman deductive logic since aristotle. but there's a 3rd branch discovered or create a to do down a 5 by a child, sanders pearson, the 19 or person, the 19 sent traits called abductive logic. and is, i don't want to digress some of the whole essay on that as a big subject. who is a potter semiotics which is the basis of philosophy today. but what it, if you want to put it in plain english, is common sense. it's good in saying this intuition. so things that make you like,

i mean, you much if you have, sorry to interrupt me. you mentioned the economic superiority. and of course, this is a, this is a big part of, of this book. i mean, clearly the i there when it comes to of being in the military is not safe. that's clear from the inductive reasoning that's required. but uh, if the economy is still working by the time this interview is broadcast, because if you read your book, it could happen at any moment. at the way flash crashes happen, mean that everyone's livelihoods can be destroyed at a stroke. if so, it and reforms that you recommended. the book on not made that. that's correct. and the point i make is that it happens. there's something called flash war. so i talked to the cuban missile crisis played out every 3 weeks. the 2 issues identified in the, in the 19 news played out the matter of a day or one case a few weeks. but with, with a i in the nuclear kill chain on both sides. you could climb that ladder in minutes

and back to legion. if we're not elation, so my advice is pretty simple. keep a, i will be killed trying. do you want to have it off to the side or some kind of alice or something? fine. maybe be, be careful with it, but do not put it in the decision making process or you will get those kind of results. and just how does these flash crashes work right now using a i, they using a i right now. all right, well um, you know, you have a, uh you have a football game and you don't have a very good deal because the person in front of you is too tall or wearing a big hat or whatever. so you say why have a solution or stand up and you stand up and yeah, i can see everything is great. but what happens next? well, the person behind you stands up, and the person behind her stands up. and before long the entire stadium is on their feet, and nobody's better off cuz relatively speaking, you're the same. and everybody's worse off because you're, you're standing, you're not sitting comfortable. that's called the fallacy of composition. and the

idea is something that works for an individual as a good individual strategy. when you stood up, you could see better is catastrophic, yes. scale. now let's take that over to capital markets and how does that work? so you have a market crash again, not uncommon. we saw it in march, 2020 market felt 30 percent and 30 days. and so what did people do? they watch it for a couple of days and i like, you know, i don't wanna lose money on that. they sell everything, go to cash, move to sidelines. wait till the market is fine, and then they can tip to it back in a catch. the next way about that is a very good individual strategy. that's not a bad thing for person to do. but what happens when everybody doesn't you very quickly have all sellers know buyers, you blow to the circuit breakers, you go to the floor and the market is actually have to be closed. it's not even a matter of time out. you actually have to close the markets. and the point is that that's an aspect of human behavior. it's why circuit breakers so called word vent were in installed after the 1987 flash crash. though with a i,

everything i just describes happens again, faster is accelerates, and it amplifies what would be whom nature. so truly the combinations, human nature combine with excel around of a i the makes all this happened much faster than regulators realize. and the result is that, again, you can be wiped out in fact your, your, your exchange traded equity that you think of is liquid, turns into private equity. you're still on it, but you can't trade it and you can't get cash. and then no regulations. so you recommend some kind of traveling all of the markets and other elements that i've just go to because we're running out of time, just ask you what your advice is. usually some i've seen your advice is the diverse vacation is being a bit, but now the had to you believe that we live in very precarious economic times in life capitalism. and but why do advisors occasion as well, among academics and their additions as well understood strategy and those for those rich enough to be able to that. but as i should say, for view as well,

living paycheck to paycheck, you know, i, i want, wants to, i was with the tax driver in las vegas and we got on the subject to go, i think it was, i was there to give a speech on gold and she said, what can i do? and i said, well, if you can buy one, go klein, you know, at the time it was about 1200 dollars. i said by one gold coin put it in a safe place and that, that well to be preserved. so yes, the problem with diverse vacation i, you recommended people go on diversified. i own 50 stocks and 10 sectors, semi conductors mining can silver, non doorbells, et cetera. and i say no, you're not, you may on 50 stars, but you're in one asset class which of stocks. and they're all going to get down to get a real diversification news. and by the way, with specific reference to a i non digital assets, i'm not talking about crypto currencies, stocks, bonds, commodities are all traded on digital ledgers. but things like gold, silver land buying our natural resources. and if you like private equity and venture capital where you don't expect liquidity or you're in it for 5 to 7 years.

so having that, a lot of cash, i mean that there's some significant percentage of your portfolio, 30 percent, or maybe more. if there's a flash crash, just happen, and they will, i mean, it's just a matter of time. the rest of your portfolio would be preserved in your well to be preserved. jim records, thank you. thank you. and that's it for the final show of this. the money gti and the threats to the global economy is that now continued condolences to those suffering in the holy land as christmas at the hands of u. k. us, you um, genocide will be back on saturday. the 18th of january for a brand new season. until then we'll be hearing your favorite episodes of the season every sunday and monday. remember, you can still keep in touch by all our social media, if it's not sense a new country and i draw a channel going underground tv on rumble. the com to let you know that besides going underground will see you very soon and have a happy new year. the

reason i was in last let me understand um your previous needs, the cost, the bills for today all the way right now if i have someone available at the apartments under this car, comfortable with a studio mostly from you nation, jennifer marshall bible for most of these advised me in blue. nice. see from us the new the new person. yeah. the whole family is a computer to do. i will see that all these matches. it's a cushion chef of it for you, my shit, get that cool stuff. some of that you'll have to issue with and so seeing what was the news. so the scheme specimen is for 5 seconds to assume that it's a sun lamp. cool, that suffices. i have a in the dress,

it was so the show and the issue the issue will be score nimble in the suddenly ish the mirror zelinski demands an investigation into sla vaughn, the prime minister, robert's faith, so on his forms with a lot of them are putting a bike gas supplies to europe, also add on the program this our, this a health states on the high owner. it's and made furious that from says offline to maintain influence and city as monitor in the west african nation ahead of molly leisure. and ricky fosset was departure from the regional power block, the kind of like an old silver and say is non negotiable. the leader of the central american nation rejects donald trump threats to retain control of the waterways over claims of excessive trends. it's fees.