to the volume the dressing was slowly so i need just the she will be score nimble and better suddenly ish the time as soon or 10. so you're welcome back to going under ground, broke out a single around the world from the u. a. e. after a year review, k u s u, i'm genocide and nature defeated in its proxy war and russian through ukraine. the global economic landscape is transformed. most of the world now looks optimistically to new bricks while due to his western european economies collapse. and the us on the trump reported these seeks to retrench, but what about one? take the logical danger, the good end, not only the livelihoods of most on the planet, but life on the earth itself. jim regards his back to give us a warning, detailed in his new book, money g, p, a i,

and the threats to the global economy. he's the best selling economics, all of our former pentagon and us intelligence adviser and commented or the financial newsletter strategic intelligence. he's going to be a game from albany in new york. jim, thanks so much for coming back on. we're seeing the horror of uh, hey, i own wolf areas, millions of threatened bites in this region by the u. k. u. s. u armed weapons. so what is money g p t, in the title of your book, outlining a threat to perhaps bigger than the threats we've seen over here in ukraine and goes yes, i've seen that says exactly right, we're in the phonetic around. although i do have a chapter on that actually nuclear were fighting, but the point is, you know, a, i artificial intelligence of course to be january, to pre train transformers. she peachy is just as subset of a i, there's a part of that. it's called a tension lately. you can give it a prompt, it'll, it'll write it, i say already. but by the way, i should issue a just claim i actually wrote this book. it was not written by computer,

but by computers can do that in a lot of college, kids are using it for term papers and so forth. so it's quite a lot of good, especially just a subset of, of a i and the, the, the book is not bash a i saw that they are dashing exercise. theirs is very powerful. there's lot of good that will come out of it just in the pharmaceutical space. um, you know that the, the biochemists like a new i killer combination. so it could treat or assure certain diseases. but there are billions of them, and a lot of smart people in the room, a lot of equipment could only come up with so many. but our official intelligence applications can do far more far faster. and actually they've produced some combinations that look interesting. so some good is coming out of it already. and i, i talked about that just very briefly, but that's not what the books about in the book i stick to my lanes, so to speak, which are a capital markets banking and national security. so i look at a, i is applied to those 3 areas and make the point. there's nothing new about a i,

it's been around as science has been around since the 1950s, as logic has been around since aristotle. i mean, and there's ever sicilian soldiers and they just moved, looks like a couple lines of a computer code as a matter of fact. so um, you know, mary shelley's frank and sign that was the frankenstein's creature was arguably in the early ninety's center. so. so it's been around, but what's new is that the processing power is much, much faster because in video and others and in town, obviously these, some of the cartridge ships are orders of magnitude faster than was come before you need a lot of electrical power as an issue, but even bill gates supposed to reopen nuclear power plants are 3 mile island, so they can have enough electricity for all the computing power. but the 3rd thing, and probably the most important is what's called the training set. so these are, these are learning models. these, these are models that are capable of learning facts and making connections on their

own without the developer having to, you know, download the information or create the code and what, what are they going actually, jim quick detour from him and, and tell them a get into the work isn't that you explain in those language models that they use. i'm sure i have a whole chapter on that on biased censorship and concern relation to where it can try to. i should just depends where for lying, but it's a kind of line where you don't even know your line because you don't, you don't know what you're saying. but uh, but the best part of it is well and make the point that the, show your training on materials. okay, what are the materials was the internet basically, you can buy the entire internet as a bb pages, or however many a lot of developers don't need that much. they buy out, however many terabytes they need, but when they but the computer is a going through that they're looking for words that associated with other words explaining what the call clusters or clouds. and then when it produces speech or

writing, we're just output it. it, it can, it's kind of speaking or any language really, but it can speak, you know, in my case, english pretty grammatically or some of the output it's, it's not bad. but the problem is, it can't think there's nothing intelligent about artificial intelligence is on that . one of the problems we make is we have to have more flies that we because it can talk. i have a pleasant voice like siri or. alexa, we, we think it's our friend, it's not our friend is just, is just a bunch about. but having said that, recently, google avondale, their g p t app, it was called gemini. and one of the users of early user put in a what's called a prompt, which is a question. and it said, please give me an image of a pope. and the computer came back with 3 images of women and people desperate us and to shauna. and then another user said, please give me an image of

a viking and it came back with an after again. like, well, i happened to be catholic and i happen to know that there have been 266 pups in 2000 years and they were on that. now whether you think that's a good thing or bad thing, we can take that to the bar. but it's a fact that we've had 266 male pups, no female pups. if you've been to scandinavia there for scans and blonde, there are, there were no african vikings in the year 1000 a day. so it was. so people say, well it's malfunctioning, it's producing, you know, kind of garbage output, they need to go back and fix it. and even the circuit brand came out. so yeah, we kind of blew that one. that's not true. it actually functioned exactly as waves designed. and that's the point. there was no bug, you know, buried in, in the layers of the model. it had a feature called prompt injection. what's prompt injection, will you give it a prompt? and instead of giving you a straight answer to a straight question, it will embellish the question to meet some politically correct will work goals. so

for example, you say give me an image of the pope and the computer reads it as, give me an image of a pope in a world where there is no sexual discrimination everyone's treated equally well. if, if that's the question you're going to get some female tubs. but that was the question. uh, same thing with the viking, you know, obviously give me a biking. it'll say give me a biking in a world where, you know, all races come together come. they said, well, you might get a black liking, but the point is, it's not, it's is functioning perfectly, but it's not responding to your question. it's responding to an embellish question that incorporates, woke of activism. uh, you know, cetera. i mean, those are humorous examples. those are humorous examples, but i mean, in scholarly research, this is catastrophic prison. i use a, in the book about the ukraine, say which you quickly i then decide is probably a result of judge cvt in foreign policy magazine the, the catastrophically poor journal that the c i a and diplomatic

walks uh wants to quote from right, well, well, you're right, i mean the examples are very successful, but they're the real examples, but sure apply to anything applied and i make that point. so who are the gatekeepers on g p to who are they? who are the gatekeepers controlling the output? you or i or anyone else or any serious atlas we get using gp. what all we know, what is this is open i, which assembled as a private company, but it's microsoft now that which is facebook alphabet, which is google, apple. and just a few other is a fire 6 gatekeepers know what's their track record and coming up with the truth. well they, a lot of are covered the a lot of the about nass, which don't work. they lied about the vaccines, which are not vaccines expand, not experimental g modification therapies that also don't work that a lot about the warren ukraine. americans still think we're winning, we're, i mean, well, she's winning decisively and the nato back to kind of forces are losing

a reference later at 500000 to the average americans. typical americans don't know that because our media lies about it, including google search results and a lot of our climate change. so you have people, organizations start with the google, but the other ones i mentioned who have been lying to you for 5 years or longer, about climate change to warn you. crane, depending demik and a lot of house. but all of a sudden we're supposed to believe them and you be to so my point is they belong to us all along the gate keepers on g p t. i would be extremely wary of taking anything there comes out, give face value, and then just add to that. if you happen to be a subject matter expert, you can probably spot the fall. so it does like this. but there was an example where you kind of turn that in a 2nd. you can probably see a spot before. so, but if you have to be a subject matter expert to spot the fallacies, then what good is it in the 1st place. but the real danger of the people who are not subject matter experts who are relying on and for good information. so being

propagandized propagandized by the output is just then one of many flaws and problems with the system that i do. i point to the example you're on ukraine's that you referred to a i was to our policy magazine and they did kind of experiment. they created 2 essays, you know, fairly short, 900 words on the origins, the warren ukraine. one was generated by a computer g, b, t. the other one was done by a bright high school student who was somewhat knowledgeable and they were publish side by side anonymously. and as a reader, you are supposed to look at them and see if you can pick the robot. i take the, the one set like one sentence, and that's the robot. and then i read the rest of it about the other one is that as a student and i was right, but it was nothing was easier because it started with cliches one after the other. and you know, i'm a rider. i mean, you don't likely share as i used to occasionally, because so few of them come in handy, but it was cliche written, but that's how a computer i won't use the word thing so. so

a computer process russian aggress looking at things like that. yeah. was it was, well, exactly, i was looking at a 1000 articles on ukraine and to see certain cliches over and over. it assumes that that's how you write a, so i have good writers, right? but that's how a computer might write. so it was already used as a spot, but so they were due to problems. number one. why said, of course it was easy to spot the robot for the reason i mention, but neither the robot nor the student got it right because they completely ignored the 2014 crude. i taught the 2008 declaration, you know, in 2008, george bush said george and ukraine. she joined data 6 months later putting, invaded georgia. okay. so were you not paying attention? did you not understand that you had crushed the red line? you are threatening versus national interest in the 2014 the c i a and then my sex reineke, to deposed a duly elected leader. okay. maybe wasn't the most honest and popular guy, but he did when an election. and then 2 months after that put in

a took over crime yet. so i was what, what part of the red line do not understand. but they kept going and they kept going. and that was not mentioned in this as a really started with a special military operation in 2022. so a, the work was deficient by the human and the robot because it didn't really get to that it was. and the, the role that was easy to spot because it wasn't a very good writers. so it's hard to tell though, i don't know whether you know, your chat cvt because it's giving southwell to assess here autonomy to invading georgia. know, but this is the point we can argue about different points, but if the eye is giving this information as a truth and gospel based on lies than the whole world is run on life, sorry to interrupt. i know we have to get through so much. you did mention open a i, which i didn't know if to be called close day i have i multiply by you present. we are usually relieved of a drum fig tree. then as regards the little most influence that he almost because

pointed to the dangers of his, hey, i, technology before we get to the themes in your book. i mean, you're going to tell me with these written read your book. i don't know if the lawn is where i don't know if the jump is rather, but i do know i'm in touch with, you know, people in the transition team and uh yeah, it's, uh, it's created some interest. i will say a few things are more of nauseous and putting yourself on the back. but i my newsletter the week before the election. we said donald trip trump in the past we're going to, when we said donald trump was going to get $312.00 electro, those including michigan, $54.00 sentences and $224.00 house seats. the actual result was $312.00 electro about so we, we now that you have started landing $53.00 sentences. so okay, off by one and looks like $222.00 houses off by 2 out of $435.00. so is literally the best prediction in the world, you know, people like, uh, uh, uh, you know, rene silver and the new york times and the others were saying too close to call the

economists said the counselor's going away and, you know, cetera. so you have to deal with all of that, but we got to exactly where, but that's because we're using a better model. so you know, so you get more i q points rated to be a better model is you're going to get better results. so, um, yeah is, is a, but is a great outcome for the united states and my view um, the champ, we just got to go to a break though. we're good, that's amazing. where's the help to generate guides of stuff to you? the more from the phone i've had to get adviser, best selling all their money, g, b, i and the threat to the global economy after this break the, there's no end in sight over how you're going to continue to destroy the earth. is the case of the med, most of the people i tried to go to the gym, but i'm certainly not ready to fight russia. this is also absurd. this is the 3rd

world lunacy re washing press for. so the funder line likes to say, we have the tools while we just start with stability and business, the else. let me, let me on that you have a very good step again that's, you know, a price here in new york. i think we don't know the aftermath any time that you're not allowed to ask questions, you should ask all of the questions. the more questions ask the better the answer is will be the welcome back to going on. the grant is still here with the advisor and best selling all of the money gti in the threats to the global economy. jim reco, it's jim, you are talking to me about how your modeling showed who is going to win. this is presidential elections better than anyone else on us. i do want to get onto armageddon. i keep interrupting. is there so many themes in there? a while i can, i've got to go to have mentioned the nuclear threats. you're a big fan of. charles sound is p s,

and the russian lieutenant colonel status of petrol. uh, yeah. so what do you did in 1983 just explained those 2 names and that significance in the book into a lot of lives. a sure i still have a few chapters on the capital markets and market crash and banking panic. and we talked about the bias, but i have a chapter on the national security, but specifically about nuclear were fighting. now i started studying if we were fighting in 1969 and that was based on the works of scholars mostly done in the, in, in the 19590 in 96. these it was a albert and the roberto most other. and that's a henry kissinger, but maybe the biggest brain was harming tongue. and harmon, con no basically said, here's, here's optically where is it gonna start? nobody's going to wake up on a sunny day. so nice day. think i'll fire off and you blow your weapon. he developed what he called the escrow tory louder who is actually 54 step louder. and

you said what happens is to antagonize one's or something. provocative the other one response, you know, in a more aggressive way. the 1st party raises the any, and you keep going, getting more more violent or, or confrontational, and you don't realize it. you're climbing the escal joy louder. you are climbing ladder towards noon, so you're not elation. by the way, they were to die. and i was in the world today right now that are following the pattern that herman con, outlined in the early ninety's. sixty's. one is ukraine. so again, without revisiting the whole history, you know us as sponsors occur in 2014, put and takes crimea. we get weapons to ukraine, put and engage the done boss. we start signing, bradley fighting vehicles and abrams tanks and attack dismissals and patriot missile batteries and where she comes back with them. can y'all missile supersonics, drones and a lot more. again, if you can debate to where we can take that to the bar, but my point is that there's an escalate to

a patent though. there's no question about the same thing in the middle east. again, starting with the, with the massacre on october 7, 2023, israel and those guys a possible outliers, missiles, israel taxes belong around. and israel start shooting at each other. the hudy's close the resi and the as soon as you know, again, take sides are, gives you a politics of it. but there's no question that you're on an escal atory path. and there are nuclear powers, all around us, russia, israel, and nuclear, nuclear power around stuff far away. and so you're on exactly the dynamic that con, describe what all this cons. device cons, advice, that 1st 3 steps. first step, recognize that you on the ladder. don't engage wishful thinking. don't pretend other words you are on that also the toilet. never to take a b stock. number 3, climb back down. de escalate. find a way and back down that ladder so you don't get too close. and if we were not elation, and of course, the cuban missile crisis was a power dynamic case. now,

between today when we're on the ladder and 9062, when we climb down, there were 2 cases in the 1980s. one in particular, um the russia actually had that will show you and you know, at the time, but basically russia, they had 2 forms of primitive a i that we using ai at the time. and it has system coding ogo. and it was designed to detect incoming us ballistic missiles. and one day it is 1983 a day. and actually gave a launch signal to the se, cuz the, the worst bodies treasures launch on warning when the other side shooting it. you don't wait until the missiles land wants your muscles right away, so they're not destroyed on the ground. that's called launch. i want it. so this gave a last signal. now, lieutenant comstock petroff was sort of the signal and his orders were call his superiors moving up a chain in other words. and that could very well have resulted in the soviet union of firing missiles of us. but he had worked on the system. he knew it had flaws,

and he saw that there were 5 muscles coming in. and he said to themselves, well, if the us were attacking the soviet union or russia, they wouldn't send 5 missiles, they would send $200.00 missiles. so it must be a mistake or false. alarm turned out. it was, it was the sun hitting the clouds on the certain way and reflecting on the radar and triggering of false alarm. but he disobeyed orders. he does not cause seniors the wages out that his life and his country that he was correct and he was and later became known as the man and save the world. another case, so just be brief. there was a us, a need, a war game going on at a time when the cage u. b. had concluded that if the us got sufficiently far ahead of russia, they knew that were habit of that gap wide and the r saturday, you know, economic military said her superior already to a certain degree. they would be very likely to fire the especially do. and if we were attacked while the were getting that native was conducting was a nuclear attack, it was

a game. but that was what they were simulating. and the case you be saw that they completed was a front or sham for an actual nuclear attack. they were getting their bombers read either missile silos prepared. and then it was a lieutenant general uh uh, the troops and u. s. army, who saw this, and de escalate here the word game to take, you know, take a pause and, and stop further action. the case you be picked up on it and they de escalate it and that was that. so the point is we had 2 near nuclear wars and the 19 is why didn't we've got a new blue where it will kind of try to kind of touch off and lieutenant general druids and relied on guidance. they relied on, they've got the right tuition, common sense. they dissipate orders, they risk their countries that they felt it was the right thing and they were right . but my point is a, i cannot do that. that's called add. dr. blodgett again we, we, we've had inductive logic, if you know,

since david schuman deductive logic since aristotle. but there's a 3rd branch discovery to recruit depot, just identified by charles sanders pearson, the 19 or person, the 19 sent traits called abductive logic and is, i don't want to digress some of the whole essay on that as a big subject, who is a potter semiotics which is the basis of philosophy today. but what it, if you want to put it in plain english, is common sense. it's got insane, does intuition. so things that make you like, i mean, you much if you haven't, sorry to interrupt me. you mentioned the economic of superior. all righty. and of course this is a, this is a big part of, of this book. i mean, clearly the i there when it comes to of being in the military is not safe. that's clear from the inductive reasoning that's required, but uh, if the economy is still working by the time this interview is broadcast, because if you read your book, it can happen at any moment. at the way flash crashes happen mean that everyone's

livelihoods can be destroyed at a stroke. if so it and reforms that you recommended. the book on not made that. that's correct. and the point i make is that it happens. there's something called flash war. so i told you of the cuban missile crisis played out every 3 weeks. the 2 issues identified in the, in the 19 news played out the matter of a day or one case a few weeks. but with, with a i in the nuclear kill chain on both sides. you could climb that ladder in minutes and back to legion if we were not elation. so my advice is pretty simple. keep a i will be killed saying, do you want to have it off to the side or some kind of ballast or something? fine. maybe be a, be careful with it, but do not put it in the decision making process or you will get those kind of results. and just how does these flash crashes work right now using a i, they using a i right now. all right, well um, you know, you have a, uh you have a, a football game and you don't have a very good deal. there's

a purse in front of you is too tall or wearing a big hat or whatever. so you say why have a solution or stand up and you stand up and yeah, i guess everything is great, but what happens next? well, the person behind you stands up, and the person behind her stands up. and before long the entire stadium is on their feet and nobody's better off cuz relatively speaking, you're the same. and everybody's worse off because your, your stand that you're not sitting comfortable. that's called the fallacy of composition. and the idea is something that works for an individual as a good individual strategy. when you stood up, you could see better is catastrophic guess scale. now let's take that over there, capital markets, and how does that work? so you have a market crash again, not uncommon. we saw it in march 2020 market, so 30 percent and 30 days. and so what did people do? they watch it for a couple of days and like, you know, it, i don't want to lose money on that. they sell everything, go to cash, move to sidelines. wait until the market is fine and then they can tip to it back in and catch the next wave up. that is a very good individual strategy. that's not

a bad thing for person to do. but what happens when everybody does it very quickly? have all sellers know buyers, you blow to the circuit breakers, you go through the floor and the market is actually have to be closed. it's not even a matter of time out. you actually have to close the markets. and the point is that that's an aspect of human behavior. it's why circuit breakers so called word vent or ins installed after the 1987 flash crash. but with a i, everything i just described happens again faster. it is accelerates, and it amplifies what would be whom nature. so truly the combinations, human nature combine with excel around of a i that makes all this up and much faster. and regulators realized, and the result is that again, you can be wiped out the effect your, your, your exchange traded equity that you think up is liquid, turns into private equity. you're still on it, but you can trade it and you can't get cash. and then is no regulation, so you recommend some kind of truck lane of the market and other elements that i've

just got to because we're running out of time, just ask you what your advice is. usually some i've seen your advice is the diverse vacation is being a bit, but now the had to you believe that we live in very precarious economic times in late capitalism. and but why do advisors occasion as well, among academics and their additions and so well understood strategy, those for those rich enough to be able to that. but as of i should say, for view as well, living paycheck to pay, you know, i, i want wants to, i was with the tax driver in las vegas and we, we got on the subject to go, i think it was, i was there to give a speech on gold and she said, what can i do? and i said, well, if you can buy one gold coins, you know, at the time it was about 12 $100.00 to buy one, go coined, put it in a safe place and that, that, that well to be preserved. so yes, the problem with diverse vacation i, you recommended people go on diversified, i own 50 stars and 10 sector semi conductors mining and silver, non doorbells, etc. and i say no, you're not. you may on 50 stars, but you're in one s a class,

which is stats, and you're going to get out to get a real diversification news. and by the way, with specific reference to a i non digital assets, i'm not talking about crypto currencies. stocks, bonds, commodities are all traded on digital ledgers, but things like gold, silver, land buying art, natural resources, and if you like private equity and venture capital where you don't expect liquidity or you're in it for 5 to 7 years. so having that and a lot of cash, i mean that there's some significant, besides your portfolio, 30 percent, or maybe more, if these flash crashes happen and they will, i mean it's just a matter of time. the rest of your portfolio will be preserved and your wealth will be preserved. gym regards. thank you. thank you. and that's it for the final show of this the money gti and the threats to the global economies that now continued condolences to those suffering in the holy land. this christmas at the hands of u. k. u. s. u um genocide will be back on saturday. the 18th of january for

a brand new season, until then we'll be hearing your favorite episodes of the season every sunday and monday. remember, you can still keep in touch by all our social media, if it's on sense in your country, and i do i channel going underground tv on rumble dot com to let you know that besides going underground with you very soon and have a happy new year the the, the,

[000:00:00;00] the the if you think about russia, what does your mind the picture, the landscapes open up before your eyes? the last one, just imagine the of the discount starts, the journey,

the the you ready to come along the the history scott, you missed school curriculum. that's why i decided now let me start is supplement, i'm assume, which is stuck in the truth of what really happened here in these off of the