celebrates christmas after new years, but there must be those holes already celebrated on december 24th. i wish merry christmas to all, but the main reason for my congratulations is the long awaited launch of ortiz serbian broadcasting it's service, both serbia and serves because serves also living there. so book a service, go across the balcony and elsewhere. this is something we have all been waiting for and we have been working a lot to make it happen. the decision was made and now it's become a reality. i wish you success. i hope you will do many interesting projects and has sincere guests to interview good luck, may your journey be fair, as we say in russia. see, especially the courtesy, but thank you so much for these beautiful words. and your law has been set about multiple equity over the past few years. so my question to you, is this, what are the criteria of a multiple world? and are they present today? the atlas? cuz you're right multiple already has been talked about a lot. why? because it's becoming a reality in some respects, it's already here. let's take

a look at the economy. for instance. well, $1020.00, or 30 years ago there were only a handful of economies or states that believe their level of economic development afforded them the status of a global leader. there are many more states today whose economies perform at this level. most importantly, the center of economic development has shifted. it's no longer located in the west, and there is no single center. we see the economic performance of asian countries. we see the economic performance of your ration in general. we know the economic situation in other parts of the world and just like you said, it's important to have criteria. one of them is potential, of course, it's not just the current figures, but also the resource base that will allow the economies to develop apart from the economic and financial dimension multiple already includes other indicators and criteria. i'm talking about, among other things, being able to pursue an independent solver in policy,

both at home and abroad. here's what i mean. they look only a short time ago. you countries where i think for at least this is what they said about themselves. and many believe them, they were looking at his drivers of global growth from the economic and financial perspective. however, they've lost their independence and sovereignty over conducting their own domestic and foreign policies. they've lost such sovereignty. much has been delegated to the european union. much has been delegated by the e. u to native bodies, or sits and receives have come to power in those countries whose policies instead of serving national interests, are informed by foreign influence, inspiration, and pressure that has led to condemn eclipse. interesting, isn't it? just a couple of years ago, the german economy was growing at an astounding pace. everything seemed to be in place to sustain its above average rate of economic and industrial growth. they had all the resources when faced with workforce shortages. they started relying on refugees and immigrants, they passed legislation to facilitate those processes,

etc. yet they are not able to pursue a policy that serves their national interest. just like it was with germany's corporation with russia, cooperation with our country was one of the pillars of economic growth for germany . it provided energy resources to keep the economy stable. it kept the price is predictable. it was instrumental for german economic growth. however, germany ruptured those ties under the influence of the us. the energy source was blocked. i'm talking about the sabotage the terrorist attack with north stream pipeline enter refusal, again at the instigation of the u. s. to resume natural gas supplies through the remaining pipeline only due to the official position taken by berlin and their economy started crumbling immediately. german companies not for in ones operating in germany, but german companies begin to relocate to countries where business is more profitable, talking about cetera, just and by the way, they did it because they realized that germany was not doing well and the crisis

would get even worse in the coming years and they just started moving out in search of higher profits. similar things are happening in france. there's a difference. of course, france has its own independent energy source with its nuclear power plants, but the loss of solver into over decision making, the rubber stamping of complex and to russian sanctions and the loss of the russian markets. another important factor are leading to a collapse of the french economy as well. so there's an example for you, and this is our indicator of multiple arity and a prerequisite for becoming one of the centers of global development is being able to make some decisions. and we've spoken about the economy and pursuing server and policies, but i would mention another crucial criterion. the civilization, the one it has to do with solving decision making in domestic and foreign affairs, of course. but it's a separate issue. i'm talking about a civilization the contribution does a country, a group of countries or region have something to contribute to the philosophy of the future. the world is at the crossroads analysis which way should have go. what

model should it choose? nothing is decided yet. the system of international law which underpinned the global order. after world war 2 is unraveling fast due to the position of the west point. it's at the same time, the new, a liberal or even say ultra liberal ideology has largely preferred at a few months, very perception of themselves which direction to choose. what will the world be like? what principles will it be based on? will international law survive after all? will there be a shift towards traditional values? will there be a primacy of the ultra liberal agenda? we don't have answers to these questions yet. there's a fide going on. if a country, a group of countries or a region has the potential and the capacity to contribute to the formation of the philosophy of the future and the new emerging world order from the perspective of civilizational development, it will also play an important role in acquiring the social status of a global center for take the resource base. there's a lot of talk these days about artificial intelligence, right?

it looks like this topic occupies the minds of billions of people, not millions, billions. hey, i is here. it's in our phones, it's on tv, it's in logistics, even in health care. yet few people stop to think about the resource base that's needed to support this level of digitalization. we're talking about huge volumes of a rare earth minerals, huge volumes of water resources to manufacture computers, smartphones and servers, and of course, huge volumes of electricity. you know, these things require resource base. it will also be a factor in deciding whether certain sensor can become one of the pillars of a multiple system. i hope that a i and digitalization will be used as an excuse for a new or additional segregation of the world divided into those that have the privilege to lead and play a central role in the future. and those hor seem due to lagging behind a home that this new colonial agenda on be applied to the use of a i as well. these are a few criteria of multiple already,

but it's already here. it's already happening. let's take a look at the breaks or the sean high corporation organization, or a huge number of regional associations in africa and lots in america. there are countries that literally burst onto the global economic stage and have become indispensable. i'm talking about asian countries, for example. they have resources, workforce, industrial capacity, you name it is the real economy. it's not speculations on foreign exchange markets, but the real economy, the manufacturer, things that are used around the world stately as it does pollution noon, did you think we can expect a return to a peaceful and diplomatic resolution of the conflict around you clean a lot has been sad about it recently. we've seen that let him as lensky is now elude into a possibility of this development, provided that he get security guarantees. and all the territories that he used to have in the past um, was like associates,

associates deals go the commission. you know, listening to the landscape, let's start with some specific considerations before we move on to the more general part of your question. listening to zalinski is dangerous for 2 reasons. first, he's in the same sort of figure of speech. it's not a attempt to insult him, it's a fact. he's not a rational human being. he's always under the influence of drugs. let's not beat around the bush here. and he has been a substance abuse or for a long time. he's drunk and his bloody power and ambitions, his slave of omission drugs and the situation which his card is being played for him. the 2nd reason why it's dangerous to listen to him is that he's termed, has expired. he's outside of any legal framework of his mandate, even inside ukraine, there's a debate on what his status is. what you see, he's presidential mandate. his presidential term is over. how do you define his legal status? they can even define it in ukraine. there's no common understanding, some are saying one thing, others are saying something else and other important reason why it's dangerous to

listen to him is that every day he says something that contradicts his previous statements. every day, he can refrain from insults and even his allies, guides, and sponsors, even they get insults from him. the words he uses are entirely inappropriate. he statements are self contradictory. so i think the discussing with zalinski says, or even trying to find the logic in his words, it's not just extremely naive, but also dangerous for the reasons i just mentioned now about with the prospect of a peaceful resolution. russia has always prioritized a political and diplomatic resolution. we've said this at every stage of the current situation and you can and didn't begin in 2022. it all started in 20132014 . while it's roots go even further than that, back to the early twenty's thousands. if you only focused on the recent history of ukraine, a series of caused, orchestrated by western figures, we use a tool box of color. evolution is what led to the collapse of 2004. that was the so called 1st, my done. and what was it?

it was a color evolution financed by western money and backed by western policies, west and foreign ministers and intelligent services were involved to provide amazon cooperation of the cools, which there was the 2nd my done of 2013, which was literally broadcast, live and involved the top leadership of the u. nato countries, the us, britain, germany, poland, of course, and the baltic states. most importantly, they use the entire need, a tool box after the unto constitutional cool of 2013, 14 the situation to go no set of and degenerated into civil conflict. in addition, for nearly a decade, for 8 years to be exact, russia kept suggesting various options for a peaceful resolution, both within ukraine and around its border solution. i think the 1st and 2nd misc agreements when developed and committed to paper and in shrines in the un security council. resolution the session, a set of implementation measures was suggested. special formats were set up like the normandy format in others in order to avoid these bloody scenario. companies,

however, a series of provocations by once again western actors, such as military drills or supplying weapons to ukraine, and simply their unwillingness which they later admitted to implement the misc agreements. america n o on later said they were never going to implement those agreements, which meant that the key version was never going to implement them either. all of that lead to collapse and the degradation resulting in what the hold world is dealing with today. i'm saying the whole world for a reason. the situation around ukraine has had an impact on so many things. the security and cooperation in europe is in ruins as the mechanism of european cooperation such as the o s. c, have been paralyzed. the agendas of international organizations have been, you criminalized energy security has been compromised due to the bombing. i'm not stream one and 2 tremendous environmental damage has been done by both the north stream terrorist attack and all the fighting of course, serves no better than anyone else with depleted uranium and can do. and right now,

it's not only being supplied by breed them to the kid for she is being actively used. but there are lots of things that can mention and you know them all they plants lines and our waters. they carry out endless terrorist attacks targeting russian civilian infrastructure and even of times ukraine and infrastructure. because kids doesn't care about anyone's lives. these developed them some, had an impact on the global situation. and even then, in 2022, russia responded positively to keeps proposals to have talks. the talk began. but where do rail through the effort of the british prime minister burst johnson in spring of 2022. and then an autumn of the same year. zalinski issued a special order prohibiting any peace talks with russia under pressure from the west. these are all well established facts. today, the powers of the west have admitted it openly and the officials and keys make no secret of it either. and yet, all these years, russia had shown goodwill, but violations of people's rights in south and eastern new cream. or at the time

you cream and citizens were so monstrous. we saw a rise of nationalism, a new gnosticism, revival of world war to collaboration is as the key regime band people from using russian as their mother tongue rewrote school programs cancelled more time heroes and replace them with anti heroes. you know, it's not some ancient history that lives in missing legends. it's world war 2 and its heroes liberated ukraine, towns and cities from the nazis. the key regime had their graves, vandalize, their memorials torn down, and instead has built memorials to war time collaborators who not only worked for the 3rd rice, but were active members of it, such as been their interest gave, which and many of those who have been known all these years, not only is worth criminals, but the perpetrators of the holocaust. they have always been criminals, both for us, for the inhabitants of our country and for the balcony. but there they were also signed out separately as criminals who were involved in the holocaust. and now

there's years of motoring ukraine. accordingly, it was impossible to put up with this is because this troubles this disease requires a prompt solution. we know very well what new analysis is. and i think that in serbia they know what nazi's unfortunately are. and they will never forget about it . accordingly, we've never close the door to negotiations, but at the same time, we know that there are national interest and that they're secure to interest in this region. and considering that no structure, including the o s c, itself was unable to insure the security to overcome humanitarian problems and resolve the monstrous human rights situation. russia game to do this work on its own username associate conflicts, the consumer bought up by the end of this year. the middle school saved has reached syria and made huge changes in the country. does this represent evidence that frozen conflict do not exist? and what conclusions can be drawn from this situation?

is it more cost uh, at the starts that you should $1000.00 of with it seems to me the distribution will have to be analyzed in its entirety. but as the russian present side of the press conference, it is obvious who is the beneficiary of the situation. there are some present mentioned that these are both the original state of israel and of course, the united states of america behind this. for the most important thing is that earlier it would have been necessary to prove it with facts at hand. today, they themselves do not hide it to listen to the statements of the white house coming from the president and local experts. listen to the statements of is really representatives from prime minister and the national because entire government. and again, experts would deal with international relations. they all openly declare that the situation in syria was the result of their actions. so well actually i'm course statements also. sounds absolutely unequivocal. this suggests that in the absence of respects by a number of countries for the norms of international law, it is not that there are no frozen conflicts, but there will be

a large number of situations that can be described as coyote. that is why russia has always advocated for the preservation of the international legal foundations upon which relations between countries should be built. otherwise, there will be many such situations because i repeat, once again, we're talking about direct interference by a number of other countries in the affairs of a sovereign state. the story, as i see it, what do you expect from the income and trump administration? is it possible to expect any qualitative change in the policy of the white house? was i sending up, but i know a lot more. you know, i was glad about one thing. i've always said, repeating with the russian leadership, the president of russia and the minister of foreign affairs of our country, say that this is an american president. this is a us citizen. this is the choice of the american people. these are today who decide evaluated in make the appropriate decisions. we will judge by specific actions and make our decisions accordingly based on the realities that we will see. there are

a lot of statements. we've heard statements from washington, a different periods of historical development, both aggressive and cooperative, which sometimes the statements were supported by specific cases. sometimes specific cases contradict to the statement, therefore, will proceed from concrete steps from concrete actions that we will see. but regarding trump, as a citizen, as a person, i was really a very pleased, but he said that she would do everything to bring back american legislation. that would establish that there only 2 genders, male and female. i understand that someone will probably say that this is not so important and that economics finance development are much more important. the situation in the us is very difficult and disregard for older $36.00 or almost $37.00 trillion dollars of government deb, squeeze. what does that mean? this means that the us will never give this money to those to whom it, oh yeah, it is a very difficult situation and it will have to be result some time. i think it will

be a result. unfortunately, in a very difficult way in a very painful way, you understand perfectly well that even dep there cannot repay his depth, then there is no positive scenario with the us will never be able to repeat the dep . it has accumulated over the years. there will be some way out. these will be painful. but in my opinion, despite the fact that there are so many urgent issues on the u. s. a. j, and this is extremely important because for so many years american citizens have been sold for so many years. their own politicians have made idiots out of them, telling them that there is a 3rd gen there. the even wrote it in their passport that there are some incredible dozens and now hundreds of genders that an entire generation has already been formed. or maybe there may be even more than one generation of people. i mean us citizens. we sincerely believed that in addition to men and women, their non binary individual, quad rubbers and everything else. this is

a completely different mentality. this is a different philosophy. this is a distorted, false perception of both the whole world and one's self. and the fact that she announced that she would work in this direction, do you know which depths of the problem is to sign off? meaning not that she will solve the issue right away, but that she will just start working. therefore, on the one hand, it inspires optimism that this ultra liberal agenda of destroying human conscience . this may cease to dominate when they said the children are born without gender and only acquire gender with age. on the other hand, this once again highlights the depth of the crisis. this is a civilizational crisis for the entire western world. therefore, you see there's such a 2 whole thing here, but already, you know, it sounds quite a revolutionary for them. creevy, he said as the to how do you see the development of relations between russia and sylvia. and in general, is it possible to fairly resolve the full price a situation that exists in the balkans and what will it will look like in the

future or so so. so my oldest, literally it's a new boy, starts us present to results. any situation fairly, it's necessary to struggle. what's, what is the struggle? first of all, is the power of the spirit. and you just as requires in a determination thing you need, are you ready to stand for it to get? there is a russian expression to stand up for a ride cause are you ready to do it? realizing that you're making it very difficult choice, are you ready to make it? are you ready to be outside your comfort zone? if you're ready, then yes, you can come to, i'm just, this is the things that someone always another justice and then you can forget about it or there will be no justice. justice. is there a ward for your contribution for your face? it's a reward for your efforts and sometimes even sacrifices. that's one just as happens just as it's not a gift just as it's not a miss. and it's not a me, raj. justice is the specific efforts that

a person society or country would send to achieve a result. therefore, the question should not be those to me. i believe in serbia and the serbs. i believe because historically, i know what trials people have been through. but i know that the temptations are also huge because the west is constantly deceiving and it's doing this historically the west learn to promise a lot at 1st to entice to send use and then just throw you away. therefore this is a question for serbia and the serbs, are you ready to fight for justice? and this is not just justice. this is the future of the country and the nation. the people the initial or is it still in the comfort zone? therefore, this is not a question for me. o t. t is beginning, it's both cost and in the balkans probably to relate. the west has been invested and sponsoring its own efforts there for almost 4 decades. yes. into what does lindsey i got just guy told us, you know, i'm sorry,

i just want to say and you know, you get them and check my words. do you know how if sir, it'd be the official belgrade the serbian authorities, or disturbing people? i believe them the promises of the european union a couple of years ago. and for one would have exchanged integration into the you for concessions on cost of issues. you know, how it would have ended. you would not have been accepted into the either and cost . so would have already been bitten off completely and without any opportunities for any negotiations. this is the test and as you can see how the same thing happened with other countries, you should remember this. and yet such promises were made to serbia, even negotiation for months, work rated in order to resolve issues. what would seem to be simpler this year being integration as promised. then why delayed? that's the point was brussels dragging its feet because it's not going to fulfill what it promises. was there a sense that god see the rest cortez just because back to all t. now, as i said, it's beginning, it's broad custin quite late. i must say that the west has been sponsoring the

media in the balkans for many years. do you think the changes have come in with a to build custom in the balkans and will this improve the position of the russian federation industry region? this is aisha mona string yet with the, you know, with a having goal in itself to improve our own image and the eyes of other nations. our task is to cooperate within the framework of each other's national interest. so might say that it's the same thing. know, these are different things. i remember how more than 10 years ago, there were endless advertisements on american channels, in particular on seeing them where they showed footage of close to button instead of close to it was a country of opportunity. that was the quote. can you imagine how much money the advertisement cost you can imagine, right? it was constantly featured on cnn was america. i worked in the us and i saw it almost every day on the screen was constantly being played. so what, where is the land of opportunity? where's anything therefore, no matter how much money you pour in,

there's no truth behind it. the nothing will work. that's why we don't have an end and itself to come up with some beautiful but non existent image of us, or convince anyone of something that is not based on facts. and we talk about how russia lives. we talk about how we relate to international events and how we participate in them. we talk about how interesting it is for us to build relations with serbia. and we're giving serbia the opportunity to talk about bi lateral cooperation through the miles of their own. serbian correspondence in journalists, the b u r d, of the rest of today television networks for in broadcasting is that not just native speakers work here. these are not just people who are bilingual is but russian citizens who have fluency in the language. they learned it or they were born with it. the peculiarity of the rest of today, and that's where it is that citizens of the countries where it broadcasts work inside it's editorial offices. and they know more about their country than russian journalists. they know everything about their country,

they will not deceive their own people. do you understand? they feel responsible for what they say. they have their own views, they have their own preferences. but this is the essence of the russia to day television networks, not to improve simply for the sake of improving the information situations, but to prove and show and preserve the truth. factual information and fight lies through truthful information, high quality journalism and true news. as i understand that this is what the tv channel will be doing. and this is the essence of the broadcasting that our country is launching in the balcony. not to be in something that doesn't exist, not to deceive or lower. i've given you an example of how western is do it, but to show the real story so that there is an alternative voice, and the choices are up to the people themselves. are you able to do more of that? thank you for speaking about. maybe you don't agree with me. no, that is not only my opinion is important, but your opinion is important to me. your opinion is the most important. no is i

just thought of terms switcheroo option, but you know, what's the point? any weight when the use appeared across it today would open that it would broadcast that there would be television. you hysteria, be gone, am on the pro west and as i was learning to god car. yeah. elizabeth. and do you know how i think you're aware, but i'll remind the audience one more time. how about 3 years ago rushed to launch broadcasting in german. everything was done legally. everything was done within the framework of ethics and legality, which is broadcasting and german. after all, german is not only spoken by ethnic germans, it is spoken, for example, by austrians and residents of switzerland. yet, official berlin blocked the broadcasting rush today to european audience, putting pressure on the private owner of the such a life network. only so the germans were people from whom germans, their native language, their 1st language or their main language would not receive alternative information . can you imagine? and then serbia was also involved in directly because the broadcast was carried out

kind of a wood. it's permission because turbo is also a member of the european and relay system and has some right to give the go ahead for the richmond submission. so for so the land literally monopolized the ride to broadcast and blocked it. that therefore, we not only know that there is serious. we know that they're taking action to block the broadcast. can you imagine? and when i'm in a bad book, jeremy's, for an minister. so to speak, because judging by her statements, she of course has little to do with real diplomacy. this is where there's something politically ultra extra mr game to moscow. when she was asked why germany opposes the broadcast the rest of day in german. she lied saying, no, no, no, no, no official. berlin has nothing to do with this. later it turned out and everyone knows about it. there was official berlin that did everything to ensure that russia today was not on the satellite in german. can you imagine? that's why i know very well what it means to launch and you broadcast in other language, every time western nurse perceive this simply some kind of challenge them older,

it has nothing to do with them. the most valuable thing for us is, connections and contacts with countries and people. and i can't understand why you can't broadcast why you can't work if it's all consistent with the code of ethics and the law. and it's not a violation of some kind of law and order. after all, there no science that why should date, in particular, the german service or other services are fresh today which are being bullied abroad . for example, would spread fake information. there are no such examples. there's some mistakes like everywhere, but an error differs from a c in that it is not malicious and it is being corrected. but there are no examples of fresh to day, for example, engaging in some kind of deliberate, just information and so on. if it were, that would be a court. that would be some kind of legal case. that would be some kind of story that could be a result in court. but there are no such examples if that's why or t has been pressure politically. and that's why the history begins in order to scare everyone to marginalize journalists to label them. we all know this well and

we've been through it specially belongs to godaddy. thank you for speaking to russia today. i wish you all the best in the upcoming you. you got a lot of good luck to you all. thank you, dave, you were, you watch an exclusive conversation with maria as a holler of us, a representative of the russian ministry of foreign affairs. stay with us and have a nice evening. the the it was widely thought the year 2024 would be to multi was that it was. however, in ways few had predicted the world did change in this year, though hardly for the better. what are the highlights? 10 low likes the,

[000:00:00;00] the hello and welcome to worlds a part. the middle east has always been a land of fast shifting sands, but over the last couple of weeks, the jo, political landscape of the region has changed so much that even the main stakeholders seem to have been caught unawares who's winning, who's losing as for how long will to discuss that i'm now joined by correct me right. a former british diplomats. listen, mary is great to talk to. thank you very much for your time. thank you very much for inviting me now. i bet it's hard to surprise a susan diplomat, especially given the so many appeals in the region over the last couple of years.