the, the, just a week before joe biden is to leave the white house here and stop funding for you create in the last ditch effort to balls. the key is because this and before donald trump takes off is devastating wild fires. sweep through los angeles, killing leads 5 people in sparking craters and the gas. the local democratic leadership is specifically, it's a decision to send critical firefighting equipments to ukraine. so we can get back to our roots, focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, the restoring free expression on our platforms, us social media of the company of meta mates. it's a motor ration policies turned out to be politically by as censorship. and he says it's ending, in fact, checking operations that damage the company's image,

the, that we're continuing our coverage of the latest trend stripe in the world right now. this is our teja national. i a michael question. that was the powers of gabardine germany to discuss additional funding for your grade. of the us. he's expected to are located now the $500000000.00 in ministry assistance. it's a last ditch effort before donald trump takes office in 11 days, as he has pledged to cut down support for p. f. now depends on the inside of the future. aid will depend on trans approvals, up to date, the united states and our allies and partners have collectively committed more than $126000000000.00 and security assistance to ukraine. since russia's full scale invasion in february 2022 will be a few $1000000000.00 in

a story left for the incoming administration to decide what, what they decide to do with, with that remaining authority, the united states. so we'll provide ukraine with the new $500000000.00 package of industry assistance. according to the pentagon, chief lloyd austin and of apple includes an anti aircraft missiles, ammunition air, to ground missiles and other equipments to support the ukrainian of 16 fine are just now dance. of course, already, in addition to the $126.00 other equipments to support de ukrainian f. 16 fighter jazz. now that's of course, already in addition to the 126000000000 already spent, that's disappeared into ukrainian of this now. so the question of the moment remains whether ukraine will continue to enjoy this kind of support. once donald trump is inaugurated. now, the pentagon already said that there will be only

a few $1000000000.00 in a 40 to left for the incoming administration to decide. now, according to reports, the us are starting to have had already admitted that the supply of attack him was ballistic. miss styles, at 16 fighter jets and abrams tanks to ukraine have already failed to sir, decides in g c. or meanwhile, zalinski. he's a relentless sends. it continues to ask for more and more assistance. now he's on all of us on how we work together, how ready we are to own our future, and how well we can convince our pop as to stand with us. the more determination we show in defending our interest, the more interest our partners, and especially the us we'll see is good to stay on our side. meanwhile, the power is defense minister was already hinting that says, this could be the groups ramstein group. very last meeting in the current format as

i'm, that's a nice so should that take on grazer burden? now the crane defense contact group, the, the ramstein group comprised of about to 50 allies, usually the need for every few months that the ramstein, the air base in germany. again, back in 2022 by us defense secretary light austin in order to speed up and synchronize the deliveries alpha arms to the key of regime. if you listen to uh, zalinski why he said that's a great curse. operation was one of the greatest victories the all the entire war. and this is actually a well, if you are some funded, quite ridiculous considering that for this operation does not make any really minutes or a sense at all. it's all swamped plan mostly. and so while the forces have been deployed in clear sky, the funks in the next good direction,

is that completely collapsing for the, the forces of the ukrainian regime, according to american media, that ministration of the us presidents are jo button and they, ukraine in the forty's they expect it to the get negotiations with the russia in the 1st half of 2025, regardless of the results of the us presidential election in november, which was won by donald trump. that by the way, things stand right now, it's really clear what exactly will happen on the trump uh, with the most pundits out there leaning towards less help to ukraine, hunger, the white house administration as well as i said, meeting with the western powers in germany, zaleski asked for more funding, and he insisted that ukraine's invasion of russia's course region has been one of his biggest victories. we have come such a long way that it would be madness to give up everything and not continue building defense coalitions and our common defense power. the course of operation has been

one of our biggest victories, not only last year, but throughout the war. we must keep up the pressure on russia. if we want to stop the killing, we have to cut off the cash flow put in will stop only when he runs out of money. it is very difficult to explain to your electra right, people to grain. now why you need the 1000000 bad people and wounded people to accept even horse verse conditions then uh no is offered by russians for us and for the ration in march of 2010 cents to do. the rest of the politicians are also facing the same problem, especially after donald trump's victory, because they need to explain to the pauses of this more than what they spend their money on. considering that i was on the ground in the course region. and before this thoughts of russia encounter offensive in this area, i believe that this is something we can call an r b r,

north korean mode. this is very strong, is the last the it's not active. now it's little bit silent, but that that is the itself with the presence of, nor could grand infantry indicates that the administration of love, you mean it's all those keys fighting a war much more in the air, or either then on the front or on the ground to the, as washington prioritizes age to ukraine, catastrophe in the us as panos the end of the tub. joe biden, now massive, while fires had been slipping through southern california. at least 5 people had been killed and more than a 100000 residents had been forced to evacuate. it died, neighborhoods had been reduced to ashes. the hurricane force winds have towards the plains in recent days of the city of los angeles, fumbling with massive glazes on the several funds. thousands of buildings have been destroyed. now the satellite images show the extent of the devastation. you can see

how the smoke has in golf to the entire regions of the natural disaster. it is being considered one of the worst catastrophes in the states. the history of a blaze has the votes. criticism of los angeles has decision to send critical firefighting equipment to ukraine. you can see these headlines the from a couple of years ago, dealt with from junior, posted his reaction on social media. oh, look, of course, the l. a fire department donated a bunch of their supplies to ukraine. a wildfire destroyed the home of joe biden, son hunter, and you can see his molly book mentioned in these images. robert johnson seal beg associates and the former c on list said that the coverage you, as administration, has been rife with miss management of hundreds of firefighters were released from their job because they would not get a covered vaccine years ago. so this,

this was government in action, or government malevolence that help create the conditions where, you know, you may not be able to control who starts to fire. but you sure as heck can control, how many firefighters do you have available? how much equipment do you have available? how much water do you have on hand? how many? what steps have you taken? the clean up dead brush so that you don't have fire hazards? a line about in the hill sites, the current number in terms of aid to ukraine is approaching $76000000000.00. so what, what this highlights is the, uh, nor most amount of money to the united states is dedicated to ukraine and money that frankly has it's not winding up in the neighborhoods in the infrastructure here in the united states. now jeremy has issued a thinly veiled threat that the you could impose sanctions against social networks

and that is if they do not conduct fact checking operations for the content posted on the platforms. according to the digital service act, the cooperation of very large online platforms with fact checking organizations is not mandatory, but their risk of sanctions is reduced. if they do so in the e. u. if a very large online provider does not work, with fact checkers, it must prove that it is taking other equally effective risk minimizing measures. well, it's probably something to do with the fact that we've seen that less liberal politicians have been falling from power across the western world. and now it's probably berlin and the griffin union, in general, is worried that they will lose control of the political narrative that they've been selling to the masses for years now. because matter which owns of course, facebook and instagram decided to scrap, there are fact checkers in the us. so we can get back to our roots, the focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies,

and restoring free expression on our platforms. more specifically, here's what we're going to do. first, we're going to get rid of fact checkers and replace them with community notes. similar to x starting in the us to after come 1st, the wife did it in 2016. the legacy media wrote non stop about how misinformation was a threat to democracy. we tried in good faith to address those concerns without becoming the arbiters of truth. but the fact checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the us. and now we know that what facebook will be doing is that they will be switching to generated user comments. like what we've seen with it on mosques x, so that will be having that provide a little more context to some of those post. and as more exact ebert said that they might though this might result in them catching few or bad stuff. but at least that will not be surprising in this in comments and in this,

in the accounts we know one of those under some accounts of course, is archie and other russian media outlets. let's not forget that russia, archie and other outlets were banned in september 2024. and that was just a is after washington issued their sanctions against ross and media outlets. so we, so mark, soccer, berkeley, we're playing to washington soon, stare. so with all this going on, but how does it start? let's go back to the beginning. you may have it stop this sort of nonsense. it all started as soon as the united states got them all the leads there. got a result that they didn't like and that result came about after the 2016 presidential election when donald trump one and no one could believe that it could happen. so 1st i started looking for someone to blame this sort of blaming process . this started blaming this information online, and that's when they came up with this brilliant idea to have these fact checkers there were supposed to be no bias when in reality, what we saw was the complete opposite. the federal network agency in germany brings

this up in the quote saying that it will, it's resident facebook that it will issue sanctions against that if it doesn't continue, it's relationship with a court c 5 check and website when, when that company itself has are found by a german high or original cord that it's matches were unlawful. that was in 2021 and not actually quartz. these assessments represented a dead chord. they, some of during the less the performance which could no longer be tolerated. and that there were found in violation. and number of times, that's one example. let's continue. we have facebook, 3rd party, 5 traveler lead stories, a former facebook engineer expos, how, for example, the company suppressed at the time there was a free beacon report on the, by the ministration. maybe you remember that story that the by the administration was planning to use tax payer money to distribute a crack pipes to drug at its purely and they just took to buy the ministrations

awards football. he claims that that's not going to happen. so they said, oh, well, this is fake news. it ended up being true, of course, moving on pallets besides one of the most prominent 5 tracking website. there was even a study conducted that looked in. so there are fact checking. and it showed that there were, there was a selection bias, there was fact check republican statements, more often than the democrats, for example. but let's leave that aside. there was an infamous situation with the there was a jump activation that obamacare would mean that you would lose your doctor, the one that you use. they said all that is fake news. and what happens, of course, obama care pass and people lost access to their doctor and politicized. has the nerve to call this then lie of the year. was it was there lie of the year because they fact check that and said, well this is wrong, this is fake news when of course it wasn't. and that really when you look into the funding as well and to some of these fact travelers, it really is a mess. but they allow that to happen and continue for years until it was time for

donald trump to return to power, i guess. and mark circle burke had to do a user and start using trumps word single. these fact checkers actually sensory more than they're doing any good to by the jump on parliament has reported the long standing investigation into tag ty kuhn may ely mazda support for a right wing political party. the owner of the social network x has praised the alternative for germany potty and interviewed its political leader. but here you regulate those are also closely monitoring the situation for a potential regulatory violation. now a team of up to a 150 e u. r. officials to be examined how the social network promotes mazda interview with the head of the party, known by its accurate name as a f d, as books. 1 and the for the european commission has set the mazda support for the potty could be unlawful, as it might provide an unfair advantage of the run up to on the election mosque has

said that the a f b is the best option for the country. if it wants to get out of it's economic slum . now, germany's transfer the shoals has lost out a deal on mosque and describe a of the party as extremis. such i've missed the crucial point is that mister moss could supported a right wing extremist party. that is something to not only disagree with the underscore i rejected indecently, i guess. now they have be, it has been on the relentless pressure from jump nice car into solver to use. however, it is pulling a 2nd place according to jump on opinion surveys with the supplement form about a one feet of voters. of the current authorities have even prohibited a of the representatives from taking part into the vice political debates. i've been awhile in please prime minister, georgia. melanie has spoken up in defense of you on moscow. she says that the

reason the you is bossing mosque is that she is not left. meaning i see one that i be your fault with. you should be more weary of judge services financing of political movements. quando, they have been shown it when wealthy people use those resources to fund policies, associations, political representatives in the middle of the world meant to condition the political choices of national status. 40 d. c. 8 on mosque does not do this 8 on mosque finance, the election campaign of his country or more of his candidate in the system in which by the way, i point out that it is quite common. but i do not know that even musk finance is around policies, associations or political figures in this does, for example, george soros or the property. and yes, i consider it a dangerous interference in the affairs of nation states and in the silver and t of nation states. then the problem is that a little mosque is say, influential and rich,

have all the eat on most is not left wing. i don't right now what heard from german parliament met by gerald alton. and from the of the party, he said of the you implies double standards as he tries to shut down dissent of much incident short. so it says for, for decades now, in, in europe is funding organizations, uh, economic growth forum, dissipating and so on. if you double standard, if it just show us our a nice, good, a doing the same thing, then they measured different. the suggest orest as it sees, it is okay. and it's supported it's, it's a heavy welcome. and if the mazda is the same, and then to defy to this is a agenda which, which has been over the last decades that say, 2 decades develop and the rest of the societies, the disagreed and the left, the agenda. and they are only allowing in the, in the discussion and in the,

in the yeah, democratic process, certain angles of opinion. and the other one say would all they compete? oh, they are right. and you're right is structures, right is not see you an email out to have the right ideas. you're not allowed to bring this in into the public discussion and, and get to information, not only from the, from the bank to the media. and this is what, what say, what they, what they have power to it for, for, for let's say, i'm 20 years and then they say in the mosque, this is a big day here for our democracy. they are the danger for our democracy. and to the middle is now pro palestinian activists say the world march in protest against the bbc this weekend this by the 10th by a few. busy days to silence them. we have been informed by the metropolitan police that they intend to go back on a previous agreement and impose conditions to prevent us from marching from bbc

headquarters of portland place. on saturday, the 18th of january. we have already announced our intention to assemble outside the bbc to protest against the pro is real bias of its coverage. that recently british journalist or when joe and instead of the b b. c has been skewing stories in favor of what he described as pro is rodney narratives. a 100 bbc workers have also signed a petition, the keys in the u. k. states the news agency of failing to attach to its own editorial standards that we cant figure. and the scandal has been the bbc's middle east bureau chief ralphie. but he supposedly in charge of approving stories and setting their uncles about the ease ready, polish tina and conflict had beaten speculation that mister. busy has close ties, would be ready until 7th mossad and the us c. i a

now joined by john lacy, robert in la cash right now, robert is good to have you join me. what. what are you surprised when these latest revelations made by all when jones came out? it's not really, we've been hearing it from leaks that have come out from the bbc. anyone that knows people that work inside the bbc of intense bias in favor of israel during the entirety of the war and gaza. we've got to take note that this has been ongoing for nearly 16 months now. and the b, b. c has publish reports, for instance, justifying way is rail might, may strike civilian targets such as hospitals and schools and around these areas. because of course, a repeat of the claims without properly challenging them. or the israel claim that there were military targets there. the soft language they also employed as well and

has employed throughout the war to describe a palestinian debts. is evidence also they run with the uh, the description of the cause, a health ministry that it's a hand ass run and health ministry, which is the propaganda language. there is no other way to portray it. and so anybody that's been following the bbc coverage, we'll see that occasionally. there are times when the bbc will probably cover events. but in general, there's an immense bias in their reporting. and this has been demonstrated pre studies that were conducted only in a few months, into the war and gaza into the language that the bbc uses to describe palestinian death supposed to be as rarely ones at the humanizing language that they use for is really use the mention of israel ease and of course as well. we know that there was a massive optic in the mention of palestinian a guessing gaza. opposed to a desk. monday is rarely side when

a board occurs were deliberately killed and it repeat, it is really drawn straight. corporation that killed members of the world, central kitchen, and even in that case, it was revealed that across the media in western media, at the mention of the public standing in a board here who was killed was either not there at all. they didn't mention his name or they described him as a palestinian, and that's why there was a spike in the mention of college standing in depth at that time. so it's very clear that why us that there's been employed here, not just pulling lead. and israel is more, i guess, garza football. so nothing on the trade thing of blues between 8 on and israel. and i think anyone that's looking objectively is the bbc's coverage. can see this. and that's not just the bbc. of course, this is across the western media. all right, now what we hear about the b, b,

c being biased and the conflict engaged before a year now, but no changes have been made. why do you think that is so? well, we'll see that for instance, there's a substantial amount of pressure being placed upon the bbc from zionists groups inside of the united kingdom that have made their own allegations. they say the bbc does not use the word terrorist or terrace organization to describe how this every single time they mentioned the group. and that they are not employing israel's language to the full extent that they should be doing. and then on top of that, we have these editors and people that work within the bbc and senior positions who are not only the scientists, they hold the political view as being sinus will attend pro is really rallies and won't be reprimanded for it. for instance, opposed to cvc journalists, could you imagine them attending pro palestinian protests and being part of it? evidently there would be a problem with that and,

and there has been and then we have their connections to intelligence agencies as well. that's another part of this too. and, and this is across the board in western corporate media that you see the stories which are rundle even changed the headlines to sanitize the language when it gets a little bit too extreme for the israelis. and they complain about this. and obviously as well, we see in their reporting that they're not critical of is really government claims . the way one would be after israel repeatedly lies to justify work, crimes, time and time again at a time when it's accused in the top to digital body on the planet of committing genocide by multiple countries. but you from their way behind the south africa in case there's case after case of war crimes that have been reported that every single organ of the united nations amnesty international human rights worship both accused israel of committing genocide. they also accuse israel of being an apartheid regime,

so to does best sell them israel's top to human rights organization. and 5 us citizens, by the way, has been killed, but the united states by the israeli forces during the period the fight in administration. but joe biden doesn't seem to want to address this properly. there is no punishment. and the same comes from the united kingdom. and we have to remember the bbc is a mouth piece for the british government in many respects and rarely deviates from their government lines. and so we see that their coverage of this, the coverage of the i, c t i c j genocide case for instance was biased. clearly there's no way of disputing that and then there's another, a number of cases where they're reporting who's just been biased and there's just no way to get around it. and it does just reflect this media landscape that we see in the west, which is pro is really that the values is really life more than palestinian life. all right, thank you so much for your insight, robert. in luck. yes,

john les joining us from canada. thank you so much. thank you so that meanwhile reports say that usual has been blocking the un investigation into sexual violence allegations because he does not want to expose potential wrongdoing by its own forces. he's rarely media report say that the government has been stone warning attempts by un representatives to examine previous claims, the policy and militants committed sexual crimes against these ready. so begins. speculation has a reason that he's rules motivation for supposedly blocking those proceedings, is because it does not want to allow a probe into its own treatment of policy, the ends in these ready custody. meanwhile, instead of preventing crimes as well seems to be more focused on evading justice. and these ready news outlets recently published a guide for idea of troops to avoid being the respite for war crimes. if it travel abroad,

they advise includes the refraining from posting photos of the videos on social networks. if those images might show them committing an atrocity. now the idea of has also updated its guidelines about conceding the identities of troops involved and come back. now if it's the media from disclosing the full names of 80 soldier runs and know what the brigade general overcast. if it's ready for the official name, they can. i said from the how the spotty said that these are also better not committed war crimes rather than trying to sweep them out of the carpet in the main of these if indeed these said being said so by these very media to that, the main ways that the diesel and wants to. busy a 3 way for me, low mean, or doesn't the week to a loud investigation or to 6 to a so it's against you. so it is easy in order to refrain from being investigated for sexual assaults against by the spaniards. i think that this is not the only

claim united but really stupid to sway and the in the end of a step before very unfortunately, we deal with these items up the bay or feel free human beings that instead of the daily will guide the the search is something out to what they do simply tell them not to do it and not to complete the post. it gives them kind that's the right thing to do now, but leadership of greenland has insisted that the people of that danish territory have the right to determine its future. that's in response to emissions expressed by us president donald trump, to take control over the island are tom soon to be appointed us national security advisor says that the land is a strategic issue. this is not just about greenland. this is about the arctic. you have russia that is trying to become king of the arctic. this is about critical

minerals. this is about natural resources. this is about as the polar ice caps pulled back, the chinese are now cranking out ice breakers and pushing up there as well. so it's oil and gas, it's organ, national security, it's critical minerals. now donald trump has not ruled out using the american military to take over greenland. that is, despite washington's natal allied denmark having southern control over the island, drums and patients have the books concerns among us partners in europe. in mind, just please, in my discussions with our european partners understand a certain lack of understanding has therefore become clear with regard to current statements from the us. the principle of in via lability of borders applies to every country, regardless of whether it is to the east or west of us. and every state must abide by it most the heat, regardless of whether it is a small country or a very powerful states. it is a fundamental principle.