sam fired never broke the free spirit of the indians and their will for research the entourage delivered on the present funds. the us secretary of state on 3 blinking is repeatedly hackles. l. c. attempts to lay out for a long promise, yet never delivered deal between israel and from us. also, the united states does not need any competitor in any areas, starting with energy, where they give the go ahead to carry out the terrorist activities to destroy the basis of the energy wellbeing of the european union. rushes top diploma takes aim at horsing 10 to for. is that part of the role in that tax on russian energy infrastructure use to supply jobs to renew nation dollars,

refrain cuts, brushing gas from that through its 3rd rate. so bank officials traveled to most go to a verdict crisis, accusing key of, of sabotaging europe's energy security. perhaps no one would want to accept that kind of ukraine into the you. if the d u survives at all, because the decisions that are made there are contrary to the interest of the e u. member states. plus as us president elect donald trump, holders, acquiring green and circular for office to get to see 1st consider the opinions of those from their local parliament member tells us that 3 numbers can decide their own future. we don't want to change. we don't want to be american citizens, but we want to be 3 letters anyway in greenland. and one of the things that defines us is our arctic and location, of course. so we don't mind working with our neighbors, and that's one of the main messages were given so far.

the broadcasting for most who every hour of the day, this is our to international hello and welcome to the news from the blinking secretary of genocide. in his speech outlining a post war plan for garza, the us secretary of state was repeatedly at gold and interrupted as he laid the groundwork for hunting over to the incoming trump team. next week we strengthened americans over sanctions entourage and delivered on the present funds. the thank you, i respect your views, please allow me to share a thank you the

so to continue these are the goals that i've worked to advance over a dozen trips for the reasons. 6 the all of this has been part of and all of the administration, every piece in the region always has

or is it hard? yes. is it impossible? no. mediators are still waiting on the response of both parties. a source familiar with the matter tells or t. according to reports, the sides have agreed in principle to a draft of guns, a cease fire, and hostage release. the, the 2nd phase of the agreement is said to include an idea of withdrawal from gals wiley. 3rd phase will encompass the exchange of bodies, the start of gals is reconstruction and opening of its borders. political strategist, specialist pressure, who was an advisor to former middle east peace on board, 20 blur saves they late to steal as

a result of trumps return to power. and i think president trump is reveal. ready to bite and blink as a democrat pies blood loss. this is the same deal that hamas agreed to last spring and summer. and, you know, they allowed benjamin netanyahu to walk away from, you know, the america is a cold. the shots. if americans wanted to start this war, they could have a one phone call, the benjamin netanyahu restricted weapons, restricted finance, restricted a, this restricted political support, and then did this tomorrow. the only reason i think that this will hold as president trump has probably said privately or through his invoice, that it just doesn't hold. they'll be political repercussions. so benjamin netanyahu, we'll know, terms of his own political career, most even cares about the as rating occupation. i think he cares about staying and how, because he's got his own domestic legal problems to deal with himself. so he drives to impala and deal with those repercussions of america putting out completely and leaving him in a vacuum, where you all have to deal with his own accountability. now we want to israel break

ceasefire agreements are already seen. they violate the one in the lab and on. but i think in this case where you're going to see as nan yahoo and he's ready occupation trying to retention sadly on the west back. and i have the international community mobilizes to make sure palestinians are protected in the west bank cost of this while a possible hostage deal between homos and israel has come under strong criticism is really security minister ben chavira has even threatened to resign from the netanyahu. talbot, in an attempt to supper the agreement, the official is known as a hard liner opposing any compromise with the militant good. the i cool on my friend finance minister base, a little smoke ridge to join me in full cooperation against the terrible deal that is being formulated together, informed the prime minister clearly and family that if the deal goes through, we will resign from the government. i emphasize even if we are in opposition, we will not bring down netanyahu,

but this move is our only chance to prevent its implementation. and in fact, to prevent the surrender of the state of israel to her mouth. and to ensure that the deaths of hundreds of idea of soldiers will not be in vain. well, i have to say that the reaction to the deal, one that could bring hostages home and help and the gas a conflict which has claimed over 46000 lives, including more than 14000 children is mixed. and yes, so i'm criticizing it even before it's officially announced. then we are is a mom that he condemned the bill for including the release of palestinian prisoners in exchange for hostages. he says, all the power steering inmates are terrorist, he's not happy with the return of gallons to the north, altogether. street and israel's full withdrawal and extreme right. national security to administer a viewer has consistently favor the military pressure on her mazda over talks and has supported respect and guys of with jewish settlers simply for he wants the war

to continue know, and finance ministers, small tre, told him ben 0 has invited to leave the call issue and has also called a deal, a catastrophe for his ro security. how green that is for present at surrender to have mice. but it's unlikely he will join the or has their relationship has been, tends recently since they are voted against a bunch of plants smoke which pushed forward. and even if they leave it as not to the threat to neither the call they should know they deal or another critical point is the israel, according to they still plans to set up a bosses. oh, nice border with guys and with idea for to stations they are. so we are looking as a much stronger as really presence around the gather street, even with the doing planes. also there is one major question, will the deal and the war actually have mass wants to stay in power, but israel says they will not stop the warrant to how much is completely dismantled and how they bridge that gap is still a mystery. meanwhile,

a growing number of is really soldiers, a breaking the silence on the 16 months conflict and guys, some are refusing to, sir, are saying they witnessed or took part in actions that crossed ethic a lines. when you're burning down the house, when you're doing something very severe for absolutely no reason, then that's the time when i have to say, i'm not willing to participate. soldiers who served during this war, signed a letter saying we're, we're not gonna, we're not gonna play along with the same anymore. enough as enough enough. enough manipulation, political manipulation of this war. uh, we're not going to be ponds in your war any more. and we're raising our voice. currently 98 hostages remain in gaza with at least 30 full confirmed dad and the slaves. 64 at the keys, potentially lie waiting for the rescue. and the deal any deal is they only chance

the russian foreign minister a sir deal of ralph has slung, the u. s. during his annual media conference for using quote, terror tactics to achieve political gains. a good evening, as opposed to the united states does not need any competitor in any area, starting with energy, where they give the go ahead to carry out terrorist activities to destroy the basis of the energy wellbeing of the european union. they now inside the ukrainian clients to take out the tuck stream gas pipeline, just like north street. and there are lots of sanctions implemented against china, even against its allies, without blinking sanctions are imposed as soon as there is the slightest fear that they will produce something cheaper somewhere and will promote it more effectively to international markets. then american manufacturers do since the stop of transit of russian gas, the throw ukrainian territory caused by t of starting from january 1st to 3rd stream has become the most important route

for the supplies of russian energy, central europe, fans, according to the russian defense ministry on the 11th of january, ukraine used 9 aircraft type view of bees to attack a compressor station which forms gas into the pipeline in across the region. in russia, thankfully for uh you were being consumers. the damage wasn't critical. and so this compressor station continue supplying gas into the pipeline form is the lab room says that it's now become a tradition for outgoing democratic administrations in the us to try to make life as difficult as possible for the incoming republican ones. the same, he says, happened with obama right before he left, he had spelled dozens of russian diplomats and arrested russian diplomatic property, reading a huge role with russia, which then even coming back then for the 1st time president donald trump inherited

collaborative says that the same is now with this attack on the 3rd stream, because see if doesn't do anything without the approval of washington. and the foreign minister says that even serbia is under a lot of pressure. now it's uh, being pressured by washington to hold all its activities with the russian energy companies for it's a joy would be interesting sanctions and serbia and russia. i key allies. so this is quite a difficult position being created for serbia. and again, for donald swans coming in now, then the foreign minister says that all of this just shows how the currents remaining or leading us administration just keeps saying during the voice of the american people who chose and showed in that the election that very don't agree with the current policies, yet they still continue with them. so eager and going back to the attack on the truck stream. what's been the reaction from turkey? you know, surprisingly, but there hasn't been any strong reaction coming out of turkey,

which tends to be said about hungry, which is one of the key, a consumers of russian gas west listen in the church stream pipeline is indispensable in the natural gas supply and hungry and central europe, security of energy supply as a sovereignty matter. therefore, every action that threatens the security of our energy supply must be considered an attack against sovereignty. the 140 minutes earlier said to that, so this attack on search stream doesn't only threaten hungary, energy, security, but the entire energy security of the european union. were there any signs that the turkish pipeline would be targeted? why would he have decided to attack the term stream, starting from january 1st, the contract between russia and ukraine on the transit operation, gaston central europe fits expired. you have decided not to prolong it, not to sign a new one effectively making this a 3rd stream pipeline. the main route for rushing the energy supplied to central

europe is not only hungry which is being effected. slovakia is also one of those countries. it's also one of the main consumers. in fact, the slot our prime minister even has called on vladimir zelinski to meets to discuss this whole situation ation and try to understand steve stance on this process. it was it and it gives us that your decision just of the transitive gas through ukraine. just the lock yet. and so i the recipients is causing significant harm to ukraine itself. there's the voc, yeah. and in particular to the european union, and it provokes a variety of reactions which is not conducive to either by electrolyte or move to actual relations. as the highest representative of the slow book executive allow me to invite you to negotiation towards the earliest possible opportunity of understanding the demands of your agenda. so yeager, what has key i've had to say. what is the last, the reply to this in his own matter, i guess, which many found

a bit rude. because basically said, if you want to talk, come through to you. and let's discuss this. but apparently sonic authorities are really in the mood of the visiting key of right now. especially in this context. instead, i bet it gets it from sort of. i can't even rush that right now. and guess what they're discussing? of course, energy is the longer the key issues the about that addition to actually in moscow seeking ways to ease the energy crisis provoked by ukraine's decision to cup the trends so that brushing gas through it's 3rd treat. we spoke to the head of the grouping, who said, t of latest move will backfire. a little more to this decision is made at the level of presidents of lensky and is also not in the interest of ukraine. ukraine is losing a 1000000000 euros because of this problem because of transit fees too. we see this as a purely political decision that will not harm the russian federation, but will harm e u. member states and their economies. the e. u has adopted several packages of sanctions and they have affected our standard

of living, not the standard of living of people in russia. and we would like this to stop. there are also voices in other member states that these senseless sanctions are damaging our economies. a cubic meter of gas and the e. u is 4 times more expensive than, for example, in the us. this is not a normal situation. prime minister fits so, send a letter to the lensky inviting him to further negotiations, and in response, he received some words that were quite offensive. i don't think that was worthy of a president of any country, but he certainly has no place in modern europe in the modern world. perhaps no one would want to accept that kind of ukraine into the you, if the you survives at all, because the decisions that are made there are contrary to the interest of the e. u. member states. just returning to the news conference by circular off earlier and he was responding at one stage to the greenland controversy started by us president elect donald trump on his plans to acquire the

danish territory. the russian foreign minister suggested washington might consider the opinions of locals 1st before adjusting the geographical map. is a really the prime minister of greenland declared that they do not want to be either dames or americans. they want to be greenland as a month. and i think we need to listen to the greenland as fast. we listen to the inhabitants of crimea, the inhabitants of don't bass and overall caea to learn the stories that attitudes towards the regime that came to power through an illegal coup de top, which was not accepted by the residents of crimea, nova russia and don't bass. this is in full accordance with the rights of a nation to self determination. in cases where a nation being part of the largest state considered is that it is uncomfortable in that state. and that it won't self determination in accordance with the un charter of a large state is obligated not to counteract. based on not to him do it is easy to do in the rules. stuff was a recent survey showed up more than half of green lenders are in favor of joining

the united states. although it was created by an american pulling firm, 37 percent oppose the potential acquisition, with around 5 percent still on decided greenland, parliament member pele broberg to dar tv. us pulling company may be prone to bias, but some locals do favor showing their loss. and with washington, the pulses get ahold of people, they tend to get ahold of it more or less the same group of interest if you didn't call that they're so down there, there are some in green them that don't mind joining the us, but it's not a majority breeland, it has a strategic position in the, in the arctic. it's one of the areas of all countries that are in the arctic. and it actually is one of the places where they have been sort of equipment since the 2nd world war to make sure that they get early warning systems for us on the political parties in green. and i agreed upon is the statement that we don't want

to change. we don't want to be american citizens. we want to be 3 letters in greenland. and one of the things is it is that defines us is our ok, good location of course. so we don't mind working with our neighbors, and that's one of the main messages we've given so far. we may have seen trouble so threatened to use military force to invade, bring loads, which quickly became the butt of jokes, mixed with criticism. this is one of the cartoons on the monitor, and in fact, we have its offer on our program right now. ted role syndicated, political cartoonist on saturdays, you're very welcome. thanks for your time today. ted. it was almost lost off at 1st just another trump isn't. but the us president dialect has reportedly refused to rely the military option when it comes to acquiring greenland from denmark. the thing is that would be more than nature member invading another. how is this going

to play out to? yeah, that would be interesting, right? under article 5 of the neo treaty, i think the united states would be obligated to defend denmark slash greenland against itself. i'm not really sure how that works, but i would like to see it. um no, i mean i don't think we would need to see that. oh, a lot of things that in america industry that started out as outlanders in especially territorial acquisitions, were laughed at as they occurred. and you know, this is, you can go by the look for starting with the louisiana purchase, the gods, and purchase all the way through the invasion. people forget that hawaii was the subject of a military invasion by united states marines. um, you know, those are all started, the us grew through a lot of things that were left out before. so it some time, you know, you can't left this off completely. certainly if united states wanted to attack greenland, i suspect they probably wouldn't be able to be successful. um, it is

a ridiculous idea, i think, but a lot of america. but with donald trump, you never really know there's just been a point going around to my head when people in crime me, other areas voted to rejoined russia. referendums were seen as the devil's work, not to be trusted. if long does this take place in greenland on whether to become part of the us, how do you think referendum so it would be viewed that well, yeah, that's all that's such a good question, right. uh, yeah, i remember when the crimea referendum happened, international observers all said that it was free and there. and it's only after the fact that the us kind of changed its tune on that when it was more politically expedient for them to do so. i think it would be up to the people in greenland to decide what they want to do. obviously that's the nature of sovereignty and it's uh what's right, unfair. and it has been pretty clear in recent years that most great on there's

really would like independence from denmark. you know, they are a closer to the united states geographically than to denmark. and i can certainly imagine a scenario where the money that the us might be able to offer might be worth it to might, might be tempting to degree lenders. but uh, for everything that i've seen so far, it doesn't seem like they would be that such a vote would go in favor of anything other than continued independence. well, enough to break away from denmark and be independent. seems to be really what the majority preference would be at this stage. you know, the us would have its own its own take on it. it's always about who is administering the plebiscite. ted, always good to see you and hear your thoughts, ted roll syndicated, political cartoonist, many thanks. thank you. half a dozen you nations are calling for a stricter price caps to be imposed on russian oil in another attempt to hit small

schools revenues 3 years ago. the g 7 impose the $60.00 per bar limit pricing, which has been ignored by russia and this economic partners trade has since continued. market prices now sweeping denmark, finland last field, issue in the, in the stone. you are asking for the cap to be the word we believe now is the time to further increase the impact of our sanctions by lowering the g 7 oil price gap. measures the targeted revenues from the export of oil or crucial since they reduced versus the single most important income source. why is it the every time that you tries to put the screws to russia, they just end up stripping the threads off their own economy. just what europeans need, the baltics in north x demanding i turn at the driver's seat to take the clamor bill 1st, then they're like, hey, move over fellow both those time for us to take the wheel. so apparently the 4 ministers of these baltic in northern countries are telling the use chief diplomat

in writing and apparently she's quite responsive to it that they want to take a run at the russian economy by lowering the g seven's price cap on russian oil. again, which has been at $60.00 a barrel since late 2022. so because that's worked out so well, like every other time they try it, wrapping up the found cruiser and gunning down russia and mostly just end up flooding their own economic engine, installing out the use of an economy. instead, they now figured the doubling down should do the trick one of their own western think tanks research figures that only about 36 percent of russia's crude is even being transported by ships covered by this g 7 cap. so polishing that taking ideas should. yeah, do the trick this time, india in china, our report as the hoover and got russian oil. it prices ranging from $64.00 to $84.00

a barrel way above the g 7 detach because those countries basically have a permanent pop up blocker that applies to all of the hare brained ideas. coming out of europe turns out that other countries aren't willing to just hop into the ground har and go along for the ride though. who's idea? was there any way it can be traced back to us treasury secretary jack yelling, that's biden's treasury secretary, another egging on by washington is what this idea kind of sprung from yelling. by the way. also came up with the idea of french touring for western countries to pay for it away from china, which again, maybe the us. thanks. that's great for it. not exactly smart for europe though to do that with their biggest trading partner. meanwhile, the e u has made such a mess of its energy supply even before any new su like this has the chance to get introduced that it's way down here on year on it's gas storages. and we're still months away from the end of winter here, by the way, in paris,

it's minus 4 degrees. so people are cranking the heat and blasting through those reserves. what's what there is of them. and they're even looking at paying more for that gas right now. with a predicted global ellen g shortfall forecast until 2027 is reported by the western press. and meanwhile, russia has reportedly opt it's crude exports by 6 percent worldwide. that's despite this g 7 price gap. and while at the same time, they're increasing budget revenues from other sectors in the russian economy. like for example, the value added tax with that. and that's as a result of increased domestic sales of consumer goods and services to the point where alternately, oil and gas revenues now represent increasingly smaller slice of the russian revenue pi. so what we're seeing right now alternately is the you and the west more generally trying to strategize against

a dated russian economic model. it goes back like 2025 years and wondering why the math isn't nothing but a to clearly determined to keep timing on the same old beaver's kind of like junkies of petty slot machine vegas and the police that the payoff is just right around the corner. a greek canadian lawyer and freelance journalist to be treated as scar, has told me that the e u is destroyed its own economy by turning to expensive american liquefied natural gas. at the end of the day, what you end up with is a much more costly and i, i underline a much more environmentally damaging method of extracting, delivering and consuming natural gas than was available to your opinions previously through pipeline gas from russia. so this is not only economically damaging to europe, it's been enormously economically damaging to your,

but it is also environmental. the damaging to europe enter the world, even though europe claims to be a leader in environmental protection. the great deputy defense minister has said that if the us replace this russian gas with its own l. n g that could threaten europe, we can just take a quick listen. you're being analysts estimate to the new us and ministration will probably use the energy supplies as a liver of pressure towards europe. it is estimated that it will try to expand ellen's. you facilities in the united states and the rates experts to be you creating an even greater danger of dependence. since your is distance interest self from a russian guest by schedule. this will threaten the energy security of the you creating a new dependence on a single supply. some of us will call out hyperbola because the us and the your close allies. so are those concerns justified as well? i think we need to look at the, the background reality here. the background reality is that europe has placed its reliance upon an energy power. the united states that is seen declining production

from shale formations of natural gas and is going to prioritize its own domestic interest over europe. whereas the russians had proven over many years to be a reliable and stable source of relatively cheap gas. that was also less environmental, the damaging. there's really no way that any of this serves the interest of the european union is profoundly country to the interest of the european union. and what i found most distressing is a citizen of greece. in the speech of the deputy defense minister is that he seemed to characterize all of this as being somehow in the interest of europe, economically, and environmentally demand is frankly detached from reality. the problem here is that europe's increased reliance upon energy from united states is the, the primary threat to the energy security of europe. and that is how the global new situation is shipping off. thanks for your company analysing you again soon.

goodbye. the good, good. i think goes on there. that's good, that's good. you're good. yeah. i think we took the same glass that the biggest truck to hit my thank. yeah, i was, i target here. see i baby. if you, you can say the best crowds. that's why i bet nato offices who made this video and ukraine were amazed. they got caught in a real wall where people actually get killed.