tried to hold those again, it could be any moment. how long do you think we'll have to wait for a 2nd attempt? i don't think so. we live up to uh, according to the information from a position leaders. uh he mentioned okay to the, the position with ability to put something to the administration office. and i have a thing next week, tuesday, wednesday probably within the next session and both of these kinds of topic. but they lose that they lose lose everything from yesterday. you know, because the 2nd time people, people remember what well they've been yesterday, maybe i'm not really absolutely. how does a support this kind of decision from the position due to my opening and personal opinion next week gives them as a business if they put some of this paper to the, to the bottom and buildings today on tuesday, wednesday, we will be absolutely absolutely. yeah. we have to wait for your session. i will just kind of book a little by say, so speaking elliot has expressed concern,

so the opposition may carry out the government. tate either not so unlike the might on 2 of ukraine. what is the likelihood of a no confidence vote triggering such a violent protests and process lava in your opinion? you know, as i mentioned, as i mentioned the beginning of uh, i will discussion on the 1st question. you know, very cool, nice. just steal my new all my that is luck. yeah. i have to repeat that games again. so position, working and try to organize my then slowly demonstration for office is the be likely to the college in 5 days for the government to the personally to the problem is that are people from the, from, from his policy. they don't accept they, they see only this. no fee is south and north from these. it isn't there. absolutely no, but i do for, for nor am i live in 21st century. i mean, political life, the depot, pretty for our, for our people, the better,

better future, especially younger in the nation is i court is absolutely on the of propaganda from from brother to safe, progressively that a few minutes ago. and i'll leave that on 5 or 4 floors or position boxes. so price for them to use in the christian coast. jump on the day, you know, they, they had some kind of, uh, they have some kind of different uh point of view of, of the political situation. they have support. yeah. some of these liberal groups. and this is absolutely big surprise for me for, for me, for funny, but flavors. i didn't feel like you have it for them. you know very well. so i says 90 percent of richmond, county and people the people up to these kind of um, believe i think they are there, you know they're, they're a little bit confused. but that's probably the 1st. thank you so much for speaking to us today is really good to hear your views on the situation for miss lubbock general and ex military attached. i use that in victoria. thank you very much. thank you very much. again for the invitation. me have a nice day,

bye too. and thank you for joining us here and i will see you in the nation is always good to have you with us. uh, that's all for me right to we, but we'll be here with the latest. i'm 30 minutes. the the the, [000:00:00;00] the hello and welcome across stock were all things are considered. i am peter lavelle. donald trump's return to the white house is world historic by any measure. the 47th president has the advantage of being the 45th. on top of that,

he won the popular vote. he has a mandate. what does he have in store for us? the cross sucking president trump, i'm joined by my guess under gaylor in washington. he's an executive partner at market bridge advisors, as well as a new journey pack board member in columbus. we have missed the winston. she is inactive as an host of action for a solid. and in the twin cities, we cross the closing. raleigh. she is a former f b i agent, all right, across that goes in effect. that means you can jump any time you want. and i always appreciate me. see, let me go to you 1st because the last time we spoke on this program, we were both the black pill people we were in the black pill category. okay. i don't know how well you can see it. i, i took copious notes of the mondays, so now duration and um, i have to say it's kind of a mixed bag. very different from the 2016 or 2017 and

dog girl, a lot of mixed messages. one of the things i really liked was a revolution of common sense that rang very well with me. but a lot of other things i was uh, i was kind of mystified. your thoughts go ahead, misty, as well. i agree with you. i think it was certainly a mixed bag. i think i wasn't entirely sure what we were going to get from trump in his speech. and i think that he, like you said he came across and in some ways, you know, very strong and helpful in all of those things. but also, as you mentioned, as a mixed messages as well. so i think some of the attendees were certainly interesting, obviously in your e mail, so it was not far behind donald trump. i guess that's what a $100000000.00 will get you. um, so definitely a lot of things that i think that these the, these i, as they always say these 1st 100 days, we're going to be very telling. and i think really these, this 1st week really, i think, is going to be very significant in terms of being able to gauge exactly the direction that the presidency is going to go. colleen if i go to you in the twin cities,

as i said in my introduction, he has a mandate. we haven't seen this for a while in the united states. public opinion polls are so basically looking like they want to give the guy a shot. so something that we've known for a very long time. now donald with we are in the age of donald trump, and i have to wonder as a a, an aside of joe biden will be remembered at all because he's book ended, trump and trump, and he's stuck in the middle. obviously, in my opinion, you can disagree of you with a dreadful presidency, a disastrous presidency. and maybe that's what you know, people are looking for something different because we do know a lot about donald trump. is it because the v by the ministration was so disastrous that people are hopeful that trump can turn it around? go ahead in the twin cities to? yes, i think you actually completely nailed it. people voted for change of trump began to shake up right away within really, within minutes of his inauguration. and um, you know,

we'll have to see how this all pans out. that's the $64000000.00 question. can trump actually, uh uh, can he actually, uh, fulfill the publics. maybe it's the publics dreaming for certain things because people saw different things in, in donald trump. and i think that will be the challenge. i think there will be a problem of, of him actually fulfilling the promises he tried, you know, he threw out 2 different groups during the campaign. and especially the, you know, the notion that said there's a big establishment in washington which people call, he called the swap. so that's, that's a challenge. but i think people were voted hit for him for that reason. i i agree, you know, hunter, i was always watching the inaugural live and again, it was a very different speech and then his 1st and all girl i,

there was some angry issues that were expressed which i thought were completely unnecessary because i think the country needs a new vision, this a bad new ment of this liberal boutique politics that i think we all got disgusted with in the and, and but it, but at the same time there was a, there wasn't a whole lot of focus and i'd like to point out to anyone, everyone, there was almost a 0 foreign policy. there is support and policy is really very much front and center of this president. right now ukraine wasn't mentioned once. so something that he was supposed to solve of the day. what are your thoughts of, you know, we'll go ahead hunter? well, 1st of all, it's always a pleasure to be on the program. i was, is a little disappointed to be honest with the viewing audience because what i was looking for is not what we got. and it's blatantly obvious that we have a different trump than we have from 2016. if you look at the donor pool, i believe he's bought and paid for at this point, and i'm just being very,

very critical of that. okay. there was no mention of foreign policy. there was no mention of any of the things that are front and center. a little bit of mentioned with regards to the panama canal, but not really of interest. and we have ongoing wars. um, you know, this whole concept of the make america great. again, make america healthy again, all of this other stuff. i don't really believe from a policy perspective that he'll, he'll be successful in doing that because if you look, we only one the house by like one or 2 books. right? so, and it's gonna flip in 2 years, so i always look at it from a policy perspective. i really look at it from a rhetorical perspective. you know, going look also as the and now your ration was happening or slightly before. and i guess we, none of us really aware of it because we're glued to the screen watching the now duration. but the pardons that writing signed, i mean, that is revolting. what she did absolutely revolting, short circuiting the legal process and we will now ever make may never find out the

origins of cobra. the origins of russia, gate mark, milly, i mean, why did he deserve a pardon? can you explain that one to me? i mean that that's why people voted for donald trump, not because he's a upstanding man, and he's a, a visionary, as it is so disgusting. how todd 3, the administration wasn't. it's last days. i know that was an election day, but i mean this air in your dirty laundry like that. i mean, i, well, i know i want trump to succeed down more than ever because of those pardons. go ahead. you know peremptory pardons for something or, you know, potential crimes that haven't even been investigated just to pardon your own family . to pardon that the medical industrial complex led by 5 g that included are a horrible virus and creation of a horrible virus as well as you know, all kinds of money making. unbelievable. what this does is, you know,

and we've had in many ways it's way the way the way of walk because you cannot peremptorily pardon someone who hasn't even been investigated. and guess what? this sets a precedent, this war is the bar now are 212 actually now what if you think about it? if i was done. 7 i said, well, you know what, you can give pardons to people and you can order them to commit crimes pro 50 wanted to could order people to commit crimes. and then the, the, you know, the last hour before he leaves, he can give them pardons. so it makes crime, it's absolutely, you know, much more permissible. i mean that's the worst possible fig precedents that 5 and could have sat. and here we go. i mean, i, the future doesn't look good. yeah. well, i thought it was trump that broke all the norms here. a misty? yeah. if we could just go to foreign policy now. the panama. um, uh, the,

the golf of the united states. a gulf of america. um, what's going on there? because i thought rush, it was supposed to be your, the world is supposed to be angry at russia over ukraine. but if you, if trump wants to take panama back, oh, i can trying to take taiwan back as well. the foreign policy issue is the finally demand. listen, i don't, i don't know what you're talking about. the renaming the golf to the golf of america has got to be our most pressed the pressing foreign policy issue. i mean, it's very clearly there's nothing else going on in the world. peter, this is where we need to focus our energy. it's like this is our approach that he's taking and it's really not surprising. no, i think that that is it. we're going to see him back away dramatically from foreign policy. as most presidents do, he's going, i mean, he made all of these major promises in particular, in regards to ukraine. i think most people are more or most concerned about what's happening and goals of the genocide. it's been taking place there. obviously, as i mentioned already, he is and we've already talked about how hunter mentioned how he is owned and

operated now. and i think mary made it also in as one of those top owners. so i think that that's going to be a very significant thing to look out for and how he manages the foreign policy issue and the days and months leading forward. because that is to me, i think for them policy is not generally something that the american public focus is on too much during the election year. but i think that this year in particular. yeah, it was much more of a focus that we've ever seen. and i think that that's really and missy you looking at um data on the election that might have been the issue that uh, harris lost on among democrats. yeah. yeah it's, it's quite hunter, i mean, yeah, i bought and paid for. i mean, liberal media is a, that's the big thing. you know, the ability to errors around trump. i mean, what are they talking about? the democratic party is bolen of billionaires. i mean, again, this ridiculous new narrative for the left. a failing left, failed left and now they're going down this path. really go ahead hunter. so yeah,

i mean, i loved the way, i, the way i view it and the way i observe it is, you know, ought be very, very weary when the enemy now is your french right. i mean, the, the big tech oligarchs which fighting was correct and his farewell address. i mean, he said, be where the, the, the, the tech, the oligarchs that are coming in. and these were people that literally used warfare to go against trump. and now they're citing with them. i mean, when you look at all of the events that are going on any surrounded by these people, i mean, i looked at it from a profit perspective, you know, being in the business sector i looked at, i look at where's the profit center. so is it, are they protecting an investment? that's how it would pursue. that was how i would perceive it. and i hope, listen, i'm hopefully optimistic. but at the same time, i'm still critical with regards to actual policy being inactive, especially when you look at as misty was saying, a foreign policy approach. war is a profit center. let's be very honest. it's a very, it's a profit center. and so if all of a sudden war stops, what happens to all the defense contracts of these major tech companies out?

i'm just saying, well, you're ration. oh yeah, it's a few, it's, it's the best money maker in america right now. i mean, by a, by a long shot. okay. i mean, it's no coincidence that afghanistan ended in ukraine. started right up right on the heels. and that was very little bit of a break there. okay, folks, i'm going to jump in here. we're going to go to a short break and after that short break, we'll continue. continue. our discussion on trump's new presidency stays with our to the 1941 with the nazis health relation, ultra nationalist. the was josh is the claim, the independent state of croatia. shortly off, the seizing power. they building the scene of us concentration camp

a place associated with the worst atrocities committed in yugoslavia during world war 2. use dash is used to come system to isolate and exterminate subs, roma, jews, and other non catholic minorities, and political opponents of the fascist regime. conditions in the san of us come with her renders the gods tortured to arise and the prisoners they send in the constitution temps. so most of them died. it was incredible genocide. the welcome ex, across stock were all things are considered. i'm peter level true mind you were discussing trump's new presidency. the okay, i'd like to ask all 3 of my quite

a guess the same question or more or less the same question here. and i'll start with hunter. is this a real transfer of power? because i mean, we can just kind of look at the optics of it to mean to my lifetime watching one president hand over the keys to the next one. it's a couple. trump didn't, you know, he wasn't too happy in 2021. so he didn't show up for obvious reasons, okay? but usually, you know, they'd like to give this pretense of a, an exchange of power transfer of power. but i would argue that maybe more so than in the past, but there is a cultural shift. that's what we saw more than anything else. there's only 2 genders. and a, d i, d, d, e, i programs and things like that. but i'm not sure it's a transfer of real power hunter, your thoughts. so, you know, i, it's, it's opulence, it's pomp and circumstance. it's entertainment. trump has been in the entertainer.

he's been on tv for the past 2030 years that we've been following him. and so this was, as he said, even in one of his tweets or one of his truth posts is it's going to be great for the viewing audience. right. and so i think it's just a lot of pomp and circumstance do i, i think we have the concept of a peaceful transition of power. but when you really kind of start peeling back the layers of the onion and you start looking at, is there really we still have a major industrial complex, right? we saw the military industrial complex. we still have 10000 people that were, are in the bureaucratic system of washington. so is it a power? and maybe we'll see what the, what the 1st 100 days comes. and if the actual policy can be passed misty. the same question to you, okay. because again, if you look at the inaugural address, it was very heavy. um, these cultural issues, perceptions of ourselves, the perceptions of the economy, perceptions of our place and the world. but it really wasn't grounded in facts, misty. yeah, well,

i'm very much of the opinion that those cultural issues are used merely to divide the people. i think that there really is never any shift to power. think power's constant in this country. and all of these people are essentially owned and operated by the exact same power structures. so i don't see, i think on matters of war and wall street, there's one party and they use everything else to keep the people divided and fighting amongst ourselves. and i think that's really what we're seeing here. they're using these kind of cultural issues, these sort of social justice issues, those types of things as a distraction, as a means to keep the people divided while they can tell you, continue to rape, pillage and plunder. well, uh uh, it's go to the twin cities, colleen, and i think that's the reason why foreign policy wasn't mentioned because the deep state, the swamp, whatever you want to call it, they liked the uh, they liked the, the binding form policy. they liked it a lot. okay. and, and, and of course, uh trump, once that he says he wants to push back. i'm, i'll believe it when i see it go ahead as well. if you watch the confirmation

hearings of marco ruby. yeah. yeah. i think, i think he'll be the power in this new administration and in and others, it wasn't just him, it was waltz, it was many others. basically they promised to double down on the preexisting foreign policy of trying to, to, you know, control the world, you know, essentially. so i, i think you have crap made a lot of promises and he was all over the map. he double talk, see, he's inconsistent and that's why people hear what they want to hear. you don't have a huge challenge if he tries to, and the ukraine war for a lot of reasons. and if he tries to stop israel from the, from reneging on the ceasefire, you'll have, i, you know, on, i really doubt he will try to do that. i think chris, there's something up right there. yeah. well, i think marco ruby a little that's last the 4 years by the mid terms,

he'll be out running for president afterwards. okay. it's going to be a free for all the next cycle. free for all 100. i don't, i was, i'm, i was trained as an academic a story and i don't want to get real nerdy with people here. but trump mentioned president mckinley, which is really kind of interesting because he was the 25th president, the united states. he was assassinated and he, his legacy is a arch imperialist. i mean, really, donald trump, you yeah. and also it almost in the, in the same paragraph. he said he wanted to be a peacemaker and a unifier. he repeated himself a piece of baker and a unifier. and he was talking about president mckinley. oh, any thoughts on that? you know, i said it didn't sound like his normal speech. yeah. i don't really understand. i mean, i can maybe relate to the imperialism. i'm not really, i don't know what that serves in the speech, to be honest with you. when i look at it, it just,

i don't know what he was trying to get at for, for, you know, the, the people of america, right. is it a we're going to enter into an imperialistic rule and reign, and it's going to be the legacy of donald trump. i mean, really, he's starting out a term is a lame duck. i mean, that's the fact right? easy is out. he's on this is his last term, right. he's, he added in 45 now is 47 and we're going to see what, what, what happens with it. well, you know, miss eve. yeah, i'm glad that the hunter brought that up because um trump has a huge out size ego. and legacy is his most important issue right now by far. and he has the, the, the, the power within his grass to be world historic, like his return to power. but he could get in peach for doing it. okay. ending the war and ukraine and telling israel to stop committing genocide. he won't do either . misty, no, he won't do either. and i think that that's because as we've already mentioned a couple times here today,

he's now bought and paid for. and i think that he more importantly to him, then i think the legacy is just the idea that he has to please those donors. i mean that is, that is his really his job. he's not, in my opinion, he's no longer and was probably never out to serve the american people. but certainly now, given the amount of money that has been funneled into his campaign that has been funneled into him in general, i think that there is just no way that he is going to displeases donors in any significant way. and i think both of those 2 things that you mentioned, both ukraine and ending in genocide and gaza would greatly displease as donors. the military industrial complex loves are uh you know, their, their pound of flesh. and so i think that there is no way that he's going, he's going to have to do some fancy footwork to appease his base, who were very much looking forward to is the credit situation being brought to a close. so he's going to have to do some, but he's very adapted doing that. he's very good at speaking to his base and you know, convincing them that he's doing the right thing for them. um, so it's very likely that he'll be able to, to, to full those people. but i think as you mentioned,

it's very unlikely that he is going to do either of those. yeah, i think j. d. vance is going to be the conduit to the base. okay. because uh, yeah, we bought, we already had the visa debacle, and that's going to return everyone. colleen being part of a, one time law enforcement here. i was kind of struck about the anger issues that trump has about what was done to him. and of course they're saying that you know, he wants revenge and all that to data from. so that's not really his style. but i don't know if you saw his 2nd presentation after the inauguration of texas. governor abbot was there and he went on and wandered and meandered. it was really quite all i didn't even kind of reminded me a bite and a little bit here. but he worries me that he really wants vengeance. i want justice . i want justice. i want things to be fixed. okay. but i didn't get that impression

from that speech to yeah, he needed to frame this as a call for accountability. yep. justice. as opposed to looking like he's going after enemies and even, you know, cache would tell who was ostensibly the new f b i, director if he makes it through, has tried to reframe this, you know, up this notion that he's going after people his, his up, his actually taking away the security clearance. yeah. awesome. he already did that . he took away the security clearance of the 51, former c i a and intelligence people who covered up the hunter, buying laptop. and so, i mean, he's a, he, he, it hit the ground running in essentially on this. and uh, yeah, i'm all for accountability. i think that the f b i, and going after the president in monitoring is a successor. a really went too far. and i,

i would love to see some accountability and some justice, but not been just yeah, yeah. well it, it doesn't pay dividends in the, in hunter, given our short conversation to all of us here together. is it possible to have a successful presidency? because biden's was a disaster, trump had had so many obstacles that he had to overcome, which, you know, kind of coverage simply had good ideas or bad ideas. but i don't think that obama was successful. george w bush wasn't. i mean, is it now structurally impossible to have a successful presidency? and i think we have to define what success is in terms of the presidency, right? i think, you know, we've heard the same thing, make america great. again. what is great, what is the definition of great, right? let's make america beautiful again. what does that even mean? right. so i don't want to be so critical of trump because i, you know, it was obviously a fan of his and, and do believe in the, the, the hopeful,

optimistic thing that america can be. but i mean, it's gotta stop with the foreign wars. it's gotta stop with bout and towering to these other, you know, donor base. i mean, look, miriam adults and gave them $270.00, but like over a $100000000.00, right. we're, these are a bought and paid for administration, the donor class, the, the, the military industrial complex. these are profit centers. i mean, unless you really drained that swap by making america 1st policies. i still think we're just running around in circles under a new name and a new brand. very good. what last minute goes to miss the miss the, the democrats took their base for granted. i don't think trump should take his base for granted. people really want change, they can feel it, their anger, they're angry. that's why they voted. he can't ignore his bass misty. i think he shouldn't ignore his base, but i think it's very likely that he's going to ignore his base because as we mentioned, he's got those donors that he needs to please. and i think that that's really the

1st thing on his priority list. that's unfortunate. but that's the reality of the presidency in modern america. so i don't think you should ignore his base. i think he's going to, but i'm not sure that it matters. i think that there's a lot of them that are very loyal to him and not may continue. uh, despite what he does. yeah. well, in, in, in can speaking of his base here. one of the other issues we don't have time to talk about is does trump have a message of unity? and that was one of the criticisms of his and albuterol address. we'll all see, i'm like the rest of you. i'll go with the benchmark of a 100 days. i'm going to keep an open mind until then. i want to say, i think so my guess in the twin cities, washington and in columbus. and of course, i want to thank our viewers for watching us here at our tc a next time. and remember prospect the

the russian states never as tight as i'm one of the most sense community best, most all sense and up the speed. what else? suppose question about this, even though we will fan in the european union, the kremlin machine, the state on rochester day and split the ortiz full neck. even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube. the question, did you even closer to

the the idea of storms jeanine as part of a so called anti terrorist operation with donald trump pick for you and them, bassett, or st. israel has a quote, civil rights to the west bank. there is only one vehicle which is used for ex dave was shank f i r as well as a dog who dies, which is actually risk doing that or was doing that one did and taking them out of the civil defense teams are tree 120 bodies from the ruins of gaza as emergency