the, the breaking news this our, the russian foreign minister on these u. s. counter part have spoken via phone washington's initiative. that size ukraine's the landscape of the ongoing dialogue between the 2 powers. if the data will be in such a large menu, which now demonstrates united states to gresham, i guess it's a very happy with this be honest, but is this a slide crane step back delete or also scramble to keep his european bonkers on board by done playing us significance after the lots are at nights has nasal membership is not guaranteed for kids. i really believe that time has come on forces of yours must be created. mister landscape hardly turn installing on

american proposal, promising i continued store money into you train, provided the phrase, natural resources are shipped side such a deal is increasingly being pushed by talk you that sufficient i think that is when, when, as the american people have a stake in the recovery of the ukrainian economy also is complex and we will get to the other side of this concord been the the us for sharing the benefits the this is our t international. my name's you don't know meal in 30 minutes of news and views starts not to re kick off with breaking news. the russian foreign minister of his u. s. codes are part of spoken via phone. must go as far as ministry has stated. i

think that the talks took place a washington's request. well that's welcome. in no r t correspondent. i'm assuming you have a log in there at for more on this so. nothing. yeah. yet another high profile. cool. in the space of a number of days, what's known about this one, and now the high profile cool at the initiative of the americans might as well what's and what's interesting, and that's according to the russian foreign ministry of course, law for of, and review how the telephone conversation, as you've just said, and re of fun. actually, the readiness to work on restoring nutri respectful dialogue and it's agreed on keeping regular contacts, including preparing the meeting between them. the 2 presto slot, a mess, 210 on donald trump. they've also agreed to maintain a channel of communication to resolve problems and relation relations between the 2 countries. they both exchange used to put an end to the obama line and started back in 2017 on typing of conditions for russian diplomatic commission um,

functioning in the west. so that could mean embassies, perhaps that starting to be open again, which, which would be a big move even talking about this, the yes, that's right. so they've also actually agreed to organize the meeting of experts, right? to agree on the steps to remove a mutual obstacles, to the walk of russian and your west for admission. as i said, they will say, refund, that commitment to corporate to corporate on topical international issues including i'm the crank on today. the conflicts in the middle east is law for off and review, confirmed actually their readiness to work together, which is a big thing i think. and this a to restore mutually respectful and to say dialogue which in line with the time and set 5 lot of met pete and i'm going all trumps. and they've all said read on regular contacts. yeah, it is a big thing because a lot the i remember the last few years, the only time the russian on that us top different last would meet would be on the

sidelines of a g 20 just you know, passing each other. and that was all the communication, so it is, you're right, it is significant momentum as well for peace thoughts and happening. what while i called was going on location and data to be 100. i put some or a copy of the speed, but that's progressing. that as well, correct? well, you know, we've had many things and where there are many reports and this especially the latest one being from bloomberg. the contact group is set to meet in saudi arabia next week. but we haven't had actual confirmation from moscow just yet. but you can see the both countries violations of some wants and improving. i think we can see that. and of course we can see the key of actually, you know, all of this may not have any full flushing as donald trump actually himself mentioned that you send this or a st question. i think they have to make peace that people have been killed. and i

think they have to make peace. we were that was not a good war to go into and i think they have to make peace. that's what i think. yeah. and keep, has made it clear that it's not happy about the, the way that to nuclear powers are at loss. negotiating, talking, communicating what isn't merging at, from the, at the landscape different. well, this thing, savanski put his $0.02 in all of this, saying that he was not happy about the polite nature of the dialogue between moscow and washington. next, se, if the dialect will be in such a large menu a wish. now that demonstrates united states to russia, i think, yes. so we are not very happy with it. be honest, but this is, this is live. so from all of this, we can see that the relations between most cam, washington's washington are improving. but to be sure of that,

i think we'll have to wait and see. yeah. big development set and on the list are 2 cars for the honesty of 11 to bring this right off, the dates on that side too. well, that's dallas into watts has been on folding, and let's speak to international economists. martin armstrong, thank you so much for your time at today. i set at the moment to go martin another day. another high profile call did told, gathering speed here your view on what has been on folding, including at the rubio lab, ralph conversation as well. i mean, i have actually spoken directly for hits the r f k. i've been to dinner mar largo, i've supported a r k, joining trunk, mainly because both is more anti war. camilla was the typical biden regime, refusing to talk and more forever basically. so i think what you're seeing is

legitimately what i have experienced uh, is that i believe that both of them are very much for peace. they view this war legitimately as, as just orchestrated. and um, i mean our cave and asked me directly, how would you solve it? you know, i said, look, i mean we have to understand that. you know, trump is also told zelinski which he doesn't like to hear, but that he expects elections in ukraine. and as long as he, the word keeps going, he has martial law in place and he doesn't have to stand for election. but most of the ukrainian people that i have spoken to directly, they want peace, the, you know, is the length you ran for peace when he rested in our direction. and at that point,

did that, so, for you, graham's was only $13000.00. i mean what his, he accomplished. nothing. so yeah, i think that is the, the position of the trumpet administration. you mentioned the administration on the names there, robert kennedy, you've got tulsa gabbert and mark rubio. of course. are you on musk, and then donald trump off the top, or who made their feelings clear on progressing piece done in the years. but can i ask you, sir? will there be all physician from the so called the blog? you are the people who run the state for another word for it, because you may have to say that you may have the white house, but there's always going to be that infrastructure that bureaucracy in place. that perhaps, let's say, well, not a lot so much progression to happen at once, or do you think momentum is momentum on it's going one direction. and i think the

modem momentum is going in one direction and you're looking at it on most kind of roy cleaning house a little bit. however, what i'll point out is that the new cons from united states like bill crystal and those people who all was just born in was wars. they have re focus their attention on nato and you're and that's why you have so wednesday, you know, over there all we need to, to create a, a european army of you had nato initially trying to raise a $100000000000.00 to trump proof the war to keep it going, even if trump got in. so, you know, there's a bit more, i would be more concerned about what's going on in europe then in the united states at this time. i'm looking at some of the names who may be involved in this upcoming, at summit between the us and russia. the american delegation to be led by national

security advisor, mike waltz as special envoy to the middle east. steve at with costs one name jumping out. that's not there is keep catalog. he's been inside line some want he of course has links at to ukraine. family link says, well, what do you think of that's the kind of lineup coming from from the u. s. for for this upcoming. at summit i think it's more encouraging actually. um, you know, you had really, you have blake and you had garland, you had victoria newland or claiming family ties to that region. how could 3 people end up in the by the ministration always such ties? so i mean, i think, you know, trump is, he's starting with the dialogue. he believes in communication, and i think this is legitimate uh, biting. i wouldn't have put any,

hey thing whatsoever it may need, you know, he just did whatever he was told. i don't mean there are strong elements of children in a democratic side, but in all honesty, um, we have one of the most of a renown political a i, computers in the world with a like a 40 or track record is never been law wrong on elections it had forecast, you know, trump would win in 2016 and forecast this one and against everybody else. nigel for us even came to our 2019 conference because we were the only ones who said bridget was with it. so, i mean, i see this as legitimate, we're also looking at, if you take this on a global scale, you so basically, you know, actually, and greece, you, you're seeing that rise, the sd, and in germany you're,

you're looking at, you know, the german government. so one day after trump was erected, there is a shift that is taking more global against this. what you were called a rope, engender so to speak, or the, the for laughter, which is just a always just trying to control people. well, i was going to say interesting months ahead, but in this case i think it's interesting days ahead because the developments are gathering speed. it seemed to every few hours here and thanks for your time today. enjoyed speaking to political unless on international economist mr. martin armstrong. thank you. know, donald trump's direct talks with lot of are putting on ukraine. well, it stirred off the hive of european bureaucrats and much of the panic is concentrated up in munich, security conference. now i'm nearing the end of its 2nd day. in fact, it might just be over the fast approaching prospect. a piece seems to have been

settled, a lot of years lensky in germany, where he encourage europe to create its own army, and then send those trips to you free. the owner of has to become self sufficient, united by commerce, strauss, ukrainian, and european. it's not to us then who will stop them hide really? i really believe the time has come. the forces of your must be created. it's a really interesting cool. you, clay, not a member of the european union, and he actually was saying essentially york needs its own. all me, i mean this is something we've heard before from the european need is present back on the fonts particularly codes, but they so, but the last a few years. um, but of course in you, this is an incredibly contentious issue. and in fact, many does the see europe in, on the a tool, including germany's own, it's called slab through all of schultz. he says, it's a big fact. no to clean now has nearly 1000000 soldiers on the weapons. if

you count altogether that are relevant for the better future that they, while eclipse park would be better, but they are really eclipse by a bus, them munition bombs and all the, all the kind. and because of this, so it's absolutely clear that the post law ukraine, which has a very strong army well, however there all those in europe who uh, try to be likely to graham bold with this idea of having a european no, i mean this includes the polish for administer, who is essentially said the european troops to be needed to be sent to you, craig, and he didn't same nature troops. he said, european troops, when president trump says that as part of a deal, they will have to be repealed and troops will have to be asked to, to supply them. so, sooner or later we'll have to be involved. this begs

a huge question. does europe have the ability to do something like that? we know for decades and decades, there was massive and spending when it came to defense budgets. in fact, from, during his last presidency, he's famous, we came to europe and said, hey guys, you need to start spending more in nature in terms of defend spending, or we're not going to be the ones to protect you any more. so yes, we've seen an increase in defense funding by european countries in the last few years, but that is not enough to make up those decades of under spending. and in addition to that, over the last few years, you think about the amount of ministry hardware that has been sent to create that as the lead to the ability of european countries for essentially defend themselves . and they're shoot studies talking about how essentially the cupboards of fat in europe as a result of what's being sent to you quite. and so is it likely that you can do this? i think many people would say, probably not when it comes to charlotte to piece talks the trumpet and call them

everything else that's come. since they're there has, in my sense being denied porting of optimism surrounding it. but it appears not everyone is willing to get round the table. it was really interesting news. we've heard us lensky saying at the munich security conference, but he will only speak to press a preach, and he won't speak to any to the else. it's not the russian delegation, it will only be present preaching. well, that is a massive 180 degree to and from what we've heard over the last few years where he's point blank, refused to speak to the russian prices. in fact, out lowering talks with russia, is he going to be able to even get up to a negotiating tables to really interesting to see where he's now coming from. it feels as if every day, perhaps even every hour we get in a very different sense. if we have loved him, is lensky is coming from and probably a lot to that is to do with the right panic that we have seen from him. since these a flurry of announcements have been coming from the trunk administration. what's

also really interesting is here with the munich security conference, he's also been trying to put the division between the us and europe a century ago. y'all were looking at usaa leaving us out of this europe. let's do it together because he was point blank. say, you know, when present from cools me about this possible negotiation. he was sideline in, not just ukraine. he was side learning europe to had a most go with who you're part if we, as europeans don't trust each other. a few days ago, president tom told them about he's going to the station was put in and all the ones to the, to mention that the american needs you are at the table. which in one's one, on one talks with america just like before the war when they met in switzerland and it looked like to call them up the walt next put in. we'll try to

get the u. s. president. standing on the red square on main, on may, 9th, these here not as a respected later, but as a pro, in his own performance. so as it let us do, they're essentially saying that pitching is going to be using trump is essentially a barrier net profit. but the us doesn't seem to give much of a carrier about this. we've now heard from the us special envoy chief kellogg. this is the guy that is going to try and put together this end to the war in ukraine. and he's 10, ron, he's gone yet. you're not going to be at the table in general. they should not even complain device it. can you can your show this audience, the ukrainians will be at the table and europeans will be at the table. where you just change the whole dynamic. pardon or victor, thanks for having us today. i appreciate the answer that last question. just you

framed it? the answer is no. the answer to the earlier part of the question is yes, of course you can use are going to be at the table. interestingly, we have a goal these over chose about negotiations, possible thoughts in saudi arabia in the next few weeks. but at the same time, we've now had a statement coming up from the g 74 and municipal. they say they will read the looking at during up more sanctions to throw it against most skokie. if most go doesn't come to the negotiating table and do a deal. interestingly, bonus 3 is of sanctions hating russia and russia seems to be of no much strong composition that it was back then. so the reality is, after 3 is the sanctions not having the desired outcome. what makes the g 7 think, but, and this thing was gonna change that right now. some more eyeopening remarks. according to the mirrors, lensky, the absence of elections in the country can be explained by the fact that you premiums themselves. don't want a change of government,

while those who disagree with keeps counts on that can simply give up their citizenship. this is what's really worry important. i'm right it. you know, to speak about elections if you want to bring us, don't want total in done to along because the freight because otherwise for the lose their military law we're law and our soldiers will come back home and clinton will occupied all our cars or is not involved, you know, myself, it's about the future of all one countries, a mode for today. really? the question is to survive. the question is to save ukraine, our independence, our people, our homes, and the if somebody doesn't like they can choose and other citizenship if they want. that was a pretty presumption statement. funds that ask his behalf when he said that all was

ukrainians are against the election. when he said that those who disagree can leave the country is a yes and another blaze and lie as those who wanted to leave have already left so many ukrainian. so wants to leave now and i'm talking about that man has tried to leave, but failed. now son died when attempting to cross the crate in border illegally and others were forced for the mobilized into the army. receive so many videos on line where men and jimmy form would snatch off uh, any males of this freeze or for public transportation, and force them into the army as cannon fodder. now another video from ukraine appeared this saturday where a woman blew herself up along with a group of minutes. are you listening officers? while her reasons are on clear at this point, what's of us is the fact that valencia's ratings have hit rock bottom a very long time ago. and even donald trump says that the presidential election in

ukraine should take place davinsky, however, his relent less than seems to have lost the sense of any type of reality and even present to the american president who was in the ultimate, from taking lessons for the dialogue. between tom them puts him and i saying this is, i mean this is up to them, but they can discuss everything, the ones, but not of all debris without us. it's why in this piece, that's why, especially in these case, i think it's the danger it as why i said, did we need to talk more with the president and to talk more with his people with his teams as the last here is the power and ukraine after his presidency expired and made it illegal for 81 and you great, including himself to hold any settlement negotiations with russia. apparently a this particular delusion extends to the leaders of other nations as well,

including the american president for well of this points. uh well, no one had actually responded to zaleski directly. however, over the week we've seen a different rhetoric concerning ukraine. from the united states, an offer was made from the country's rare earth minerals where donald trump said he wants to at least half a trillion dollars worth of ukraine's natural resources. now, other sources suggest that the white house wants at least 50 percent of all that ukraine has to offer. the landscape says that's the agreements offered by the united states does not protect the interests of ukraine. so he did not approve it. you want some more details from the buyers of these countries, natural resources in particular, how the income will be distributed and how that income will buildings security guarantees the meanings to them. i did not allow the ministers to sign the relevant agreement because it is not yet ready in my opinion, to protect us and our interests. for me,

it is very important to talk about in estimates in ukraine, and this should be written out legally and correctly. and it is an investment, and you can think about how to distribute the profits from it. if all this is connected with security guarantees, i don't see this connection in the document yet. well, it's really hard to actually gauge what sounds you ask his mind these days. he's gone back and forth on many of his statements. and in terms of sending off ukraine, well, in this case is probably about savings face. and by the way, not in front of his own people, but for the masters who finance, he's deadly escapades over the years and now want their money back taken listen to the secretary of the treasury of the united states. currently we are aligned with ukrainians and values, we're aligned with them on security and we want to become more aligned with them on economics. and i think that is when, when, as the american people have

a stake in the recovery of ukrainian economy, posters, conflict, and we will get to the other side of this conflict. then they, the us will share in the benefits and by having us a partnership, capital and ingenuity. i think ukrainian economy, that the us involvement will act as an excel. right. you know, just next door to ukraine is one of the great success stories. the of the past 30 years of poland, poland has had the 2nd highest economic growth in the world since the 1990s after china. so why couldn't ukraine do that? and why shouldn't the american people share in that through rivers, through their energy and through their state owned enterprises. and we bring best practices in terms of privatization in terms of modernization pad from once calls is key. the best salesman on there as well. she certainly knows how to drive a bargain, in this case,

it's selling off his home country to the highest bidder. a 0 to the west initially, he has now certainly revealed his for self and 1st and foremost. so he's on peoples, right? okay, so while i'm another much discussed topic, you create tools and men's potential as a major global supplier of critical role materials vital to the defense tech and green energy sectors. the country. busy europe's largest titanium, unless the and reserves, which would become the most often metals across the world. unless say, if the us and kids sign the mineral agreement, contracts could amount to trillions of dollars. but your ration studies, academic and commented, or greg simon's is up, if you love him here until then, ski is willing to sell anything to the truck administration. if it means he can hold onto power, but he's just desperate. he noises. time is rapidly running out, and i mean, he is absolutely nowhere to go in some form of, i mean

a count reminding you, trying for too long because someone who gets them. uh, and this is just pure desperation. and i think he's just trying to buy a muslim a one time bought 10 zalinski, give away to the americans to a piece of. and this is going to be a states enterprises a and was was lambs, but they have live. so it's going to be a bias either on anything on value in with to the americans, and specifically the drum, the inspection. well, mr. lindsey's time in the spotlight up the munich security conference was interesting beyond his controversial comments to 1st thing that was though ukrainian translator for his big interview. and then when it happened and it was open to questions afterwards, the request was met with will take a look for yourself or can i speak you right now?

no. i think i have a time for one kind of one question from the audience. maybe one or 2, somebody, but a question for the president. apparently not telphone. meanwhile, the person whose name was on everyone's lips wasn't even off the conference with western politicians, seemingly wanting to bring up vladimir putin no matter the topic being discussed. he would not invade a native nation in my view because he understands the consequences would be too severe, have added on. so we also will not accept any solution that leads to the coupling of american and european security. only one person would benefit from that president put them to 131414, however much the europeans may try to pretend otherwise and deny reality are losing this con, at the end of the day, i think it not only challenges use of their view of russia and themselves,

the european countries are their, their world view. but i think it also fundamentally challenges their identity because they've been so wrapped up in a mess. the antics supremacist ideology of western exceptionalism. that it's a shock to the, to the core. that they are losing to a country that they have continually derided as, as a gas station. it's, it's crushing their own world view and conception of who they are, that they're losing this conflict. and they just can't get away from their obsession with fulton as the singular representation of russian duties. well, we mentioned it just a few moments ago and we indeed have heard a lot about the us planned to mine. there were earth minerals of ukraine, but today's guest on going underground say's its a non starter or your professor gilbert. dr. was rushing out for that's next and

i'll catch you again of the top. see you then the mass general tents here. welcome back to going undergrad, real cussing around the world from you a e and a week that's always on mux x sensor. our journalism, such as the power of the tesla oligarch. because at the time of this show, x is refused to explain why we used to have free speech on x, even though the genocide jo, his regime in washington. you can now follow us on my personal account at ashton retents say, you don't love censorship game just weeks after which we did our interview with president trump's new deputy assistant, us tweeting about palestinian energy resources.