to mr. president, that is why the united states oppose putting forward another resolution. and that is why we cannot support ukraine's resolution. and we urges withdrawal in favor of a strong statement committing us to end the war and work towards a lasting peace. the united states also requests the general assembly take action on the united states, proposed resolution immediately following consideration of the ukraine drafted resolution. you mean should political issue? sure, no less panic is felt in a number of european capitals where all these years, they don't totally help the key of click and covered up his crimes, but also not should rest of phobia, right on trades and fabrications about the goals and objectives, the best professional military operation was that as a result in flight and such a huge bubble of lies from which it is now very difficult for them to get out. they tried to ignore the fact that the winds have changed and the clear demand for peace has been full. and with the only obstacle being,

the key of you said the end is your opinion. accomplice is a stuff everyone who will press the button in this hold at the moment of voting on the you. ukraine project faces a choice either to play along with zalinski and his son says, supposing that fantasy detached from reality will to make a clear choice in favor of practical and realistic steps that can stop military action in ukraine in the very near future do not let yourself be just so you have to remember historic moment is not on the for you cream. a historic moment is not on the for euro. a historic moment for the entire democratic road. and the way we answer to the russian aggression today will define not only the future of ukraine will define not only the future of europe as it will define our common future. the future of anti democratic quote and the future of the un cooking trunk window of opportunity for peace is opened on china support or excess of what they

do credit to piece, including the on the sending risk between the us and russia and of hong launching piece towards china encourages the party's concern on other stakeholders to participate in the negotiation processing. you don't, i would appreciate it and has repeatedly a for, you know, new chest commitment to peace in ukraine and has even contributed by putting forward a piece proposal to push the parties to us negotiation and a comprehensive settlement. so they've come in teams, but the current as a lucian does not go far enough in terms of into city and creating a positive momentum towards a peaceful negotiation. so i've got a huge heavy importance to make a real and meaningful progress to us. the piece kind of then contribute to what say the divisiveness, conservative us political commentator, jo altman, told us that the security council resolution shows that the world is finally waking

up to the reality. the ukraine conflict. the ramifications are if everyone follows that, that it should lead to a little bit of pressure being put on a piece deal between russia and ukraine. so it's a what, what i found interesting is that there was no nase against a resolution, but there were 5 of stains in the, in the, in resolution. so i think what we're doing is we're starting to signal that there is no appetite globally for the conflict that exists between ukraine and russia. and recognizing that in, in essence, it was a proxy war between the united states and russia that they used ukraine through. and that, that's also then gonna trigger the, the precipice of why like, why was there ever and offensive to begin with. i think that had a lot more to do with the influences of those these, these really bad people in ukraine. they were using it as a, as, as a hide whole for all the bad people around the country and around the world. the conservative christian democrats have won the german federal election leaving the

chancellor all luck, shouts as, as the party trailing in. 3rd. but the story of the ballot looks to be the alternative for germany's showing, taking a 5th of the vote and finishing 2nd parties strongest ever result. and with that the right we have the are demanding a key role in the coalition to before to come in just 3 years since the last from the start collections we've doubled our support in can you believe it? it's for a party that's only 12 years old. that's quite an achievement. now, let's discuss collaboration with the cd. you can get the voters are calling for a center, right government on. but ultimately it's up to the union to decide whether they want to make that happen. he's told right now is friedrich marriage appears. determined to maintain his blockade against the side, or should we find this blockade attitude on democratic? it's simply not fair to exclude millions of voters that rights in i have one guy on, while older voters in the nations west riley to behind the cd used frederick mertz,

younger people in the east flocks to anti establishment parties like the a f d, which doubled its vote share from 2021 even with the updates of storage performance and calls for inclusion. it seems the cd you is set on keeping them out of power. germany's likely next chancellor has pledged to steer clear of any alliance with the anti mass migration move does eastern vips, if those who truly adopt america 1st as their motto, almost to the point of america alone come out on top. it will be challenging being fixed, however, i remain optimistic that we can preserve the transatlantic relationship construct. as i mentioned, if this bond is separate, it won't just harm europe. it will also negatively impact america. i am genuinely worried about the messages coming from washington, particularly in recent days. and because i've never the less, i don't think this is the final statistician also. additionally, we're greatly concerned about the apparent efforts to negotiate with russia without

involving europeans or considering ukraine's. indeed, this approach is completely unacceptable for both ukraine in europe or to contributor thomas pen notes. the german economy is already suffering, as it puts an ever expanding bill for the ukraine conflict. a bounce is a hard liner, but in terms of you know, practicality, what can you practically do regarding uh, you know, support for your train. um, really is a decision that snow comes down from to most called the united states. um, i just don't see germany in a position to really to alter the course of anything in terms of, of ukraine or whether they delivered taurus or not. it's not really a game changer. so we'll see how that plays out. but he, he's gonna, he's gonna push our score and i think, i mean, the jeep be promised that when card for it we, we have serious problems in this country. ukraine. it's, it's not really a germans or we've lost tens of thousands of jobs in this country. over the past 2

years, big companies like for us where i could have been just crushed, the close factories, physical, big steel manufacturer or all these big companies have just been decimated at the middle class is also designated and it's covered with the tax burden is ridiculous and what the german border is essentially forwarded to maintain the status quo. the terms of, you know, the domestic policy. i just don't see much changing under, under mertz. and maybe he's the made a lot of promises, but i don't think much will change here. now coming up next as president vladimir putin is media interview on the 3rd anniversary of russia, special military operation. the response to the piece, making initiatives coming from the trump white house, and also pitches some serious geo political offers from las go take a list. the

mr. poaching, we have just watched your meeting on rad us metals. i think that now all the media in the world are interested in rad metals, but in a slightly different aspect, the u. s. is to put it mildly urging zalinski to sign a deal with them regarding these resources as a payment for 18 ukraine from the previous administration, the bite and administration. how do you assess the prospects of such an agreement for this one of the bucks and even doesn't concern that? i don't have an opinion on that. and i don't even want to think about it. of course, there must be an estimate of the sources. how many of these resources are here? how much that cost and so, so i've decided which is not allow me citizenship, but what this business is, or what we discussed at the meeting, it's a threat of metal small. it's very important, the resources for the modern sector will need money. we're not doing enough in this area yet. we must do more. and the point of today's meeting is to concentrate at

the 1st station in our administrative capacity in this area. we wouldn't be ready to work with our american partners when i say our americans, not necessarily. i mean, not only administrative comes government entities, but also businesses. if they were interested in working together, we suddenly half by far more. and i want to emphasize that by far more social skills, this kind of just been in your brain brushing is one of the absolute lead us in terms of so small piece of metals they have found in the north, in the far east, the visa, quite capital intensive capital investments, capital intensive projects. we're happy to work together with any for the models, including from the u. s. yes, by the way, that is also true for our new territories. we are ready to engage ford in on us to the so called new hist to go to the recent events where it's down to the adoption situation where they all support certain results. say we are ready to work with

all students, including americans in the new regions to yes, of course, very new items these days. we are seeing a flurry of statements and discussions. everyone is discussing trump. why does he say so harshly that zalinski should go to the elections that he has a rating of 4 percent europeans, very much criticized from all these statements. and in general, there are opinions that the current approach of the us president plays into the hands of russia. is it true? absolutely. i believe that faith says absolutely not true. so i have my own point of view. and it is that one percent of what you have just outlined is the kind of leader of the key of regime is becoming it don't succeed here for the armed forces only increased because he gives a ridiculous folders dictated not by me to try consideration and spot political considerations, and it is not clear what they are based on,

and this leads to on justifiably high last has to be in order to say very high, it can destroy the closest for the ukranian army. he's becoming toxic for the nation as a whole. and this is evidenced, i think, by today's vote in the parliament to expand his bones. finally, he has the corner to himself with a degree many negotiations with the russian federation. on a piece 3, she ended those negotiations keys of aging. those dogs wants these documents not sooner or later or other sooner. this will most likely lead to the need to cancel muscle. and as soon as this happens, they should immediately go to polls. that will then be no reason not to hold elections. after all, today, elections in ukraine, it's not, i'm not held onto the pretext of martial loans. if you've set it on negotiations, then that is a possible quick need to lift marshall and don't go to the full. so either way is in this as well. they've got instead of the machine has

a problem because it does not matter how many percent he has for whatever the important thing is that he is reaching according to our data. which is objective, use executive federal for his close as possible. political arrival, misses, missteps, allusion, and some of the former commands the ukrainian forces was exiled to london is an agent is twice as high. and if we add to that, the possible support from other political figures, including former prime ministers, or former presidents, the chance is all the incumbent 3, she went into the election. absolutely not on the 0. but unless of course, something is blatantly pretty and the bed for him to eat will be quite noticeable. and so he is driving the decay on both admitted to the society in the state and incumbent president trump. probably the eliza sees and is pushing him to go to the elections and i think he wants to improve the political environment in ukraine to

consolidate society to create conditions for the survival of the grant in states. and on the whole, it is not so much in favor of fashion. so after all, we have a conflict with account under james. it is for the benefit of ukraine's itself. among other things, the incumbent president has announced that he wants to make peace, by the way. so do we as and as soon as possible and to cut on the head of the machine is standing is a way of achieving the goals and that's hands the position it seems to meet the president of the united states. it has nothing to do with russian interest. this is more likely in the interest of ukraine or the ukrainian state. we have an idea of these either. although of course, we would like this territory not to be used as a breach had for the tax on that. i think the duration is not used as a hostile breach has for us. so that eventually turns into a friendly neighboring states. for some some, some we hear

a lot of different statements from trump every day you've met with a more than one. most recently you had a phone conversation, does he act on emotion? low cost, not certainly in the car, and it's kind of a shame and guess gives you an excuse to show emotion, but from what i just said, because that's not what i'm seeing pretty soon just as and this action is not based on emotion, but either on cold calculation and rational approach to the situation. so in this situation, we, strangely enough, frankly speaking, we were interested in having him stay in power and for the kind of often the she was reach, we had an armed conflict. however, if you see the stance in ukrainian stage and of course in the action needed and slides the other way around, the ring to power of the people who will enjoy the trust. most of the people of ukraine. how much time but the europeans, do they even understand, in our opinion,

the essence of the current situation around you crank and the use of this policy? just you ask them, judging by the way they act, it seems to me that they do not understand it very much. but that does not the point. the point is based as follows. like the new president of the united states, as a political lead associated being congress are linked to the constitution. they are biased and they've said to them for almost 2 months, the sheer to be and now it is very difficult, almost impossible for them to steer away from this position without losing face in their other difficult and tricky position smith. i need some domestic elections. 3 elections stand offs in parliament, and so it is almost impossible for them to change their position and come to the end. the cotton president of the u. s. has his hands free. he is free from these fetters and has nothing that prevents him from moving forward and working towards

resolving the conflict. it's also part of his nature. she acts in straightforward manner and feels no qualms about it. he's in a unique position. she doesn't just say what he thinks, he says what he wants. well, that's the privilege of being deleted all the major, great phone. you know the process for us all of us. i asked you a few days ago in some petersburg that everybody wants to have some kind of said in the russian american negotiations. but the europeans continue to demand to say in the negotiations around ukraine. what is your take this issue and using blog? i don't see anything wrong here. demanding. i guess no one came to mind. anything, especially not from russia, just let them do month favorites from someone else. they've been demanding things from them vessels for thousands of years now that get into the mountains. so they show that other sit quietly at home with their 2 months and thinks about how they

ended up in such a situation. but their participation in the negotiation process gives the necessary elements, of course. but we've never said no, i mean we were in constant discussions with them at some points with my goals. so it's a far fetched ideas to defeat the russia on the battlefield. they themselves have used to maintain contacts with autism. and if they want to come back, they're welcome to i also saw the response to our phone conversations with the president of the united states. and they meeting in the slides because in order to solve complex and even acute issues, including the ukraine crisis, both in the russia and the united states must make the 1st has them some space. first step should be to increase the levels of the process between both needs. that's what we did in the react. just this is what the next maybe by the high level conflicts will be devoted. so without this isn't both about this whole issue, including an issue that's complex systems, acute bronchitis, but the fans have to do with this easily,

this concerns by level ration. i'm going to come to nations too much. why do we need your opinions? what are they going to do here? both, you know, the telephone conversation by the way and at the meeting, we didn't discuss the ukraine crisis, but it was not discussed in any substantive way. we only agree that we would approach it. but in this sense, and in this case, of course, we don't say no, it is a participation on the european countries. we also respect to the position of our friends from bodies who have created. and basically i just spoke to dave with a chairman of the people's republic of china. and we also talked about this. she has informed me that this piece group will be meeting in new york in the near future. to discuss this, this, we're grateful to all of our minors who are using these issues for one pacific beast. it means that not only european, but all the countries have the right and can participate and respect. and so i

wanted to ask you to comment on a few more of trump statements and their loan something hopefully not a whole family. surely. he said for example, that he wants to propose to you and the leader of china to come defense budgets in huh. what do you think of best ideas? what's in this room with us? no, i think i might know what this is based on. it's based. it depends on the findings of british research center, which claims to have calculated power spends and by purchasing power. managing last year in the us had this few years, it's $968000000000.00 voting and if it would process and china suspending it as well. and number is at adams approximately if we compare to washington china spending compliant americans today. first of all, we need to look into that there was calculations from a breach or center, so they can be accurate on not quite accurate or not centered at home. we look into that 20 seconds. i can not go the people's republic of china seas. there has been attempts on the part of the us about strategic offensive homes and other very

serious matters. so that's the business of all the people say about think of china . we could strike a deal with a united states. we don't mind. i think the idea is a good one. the united states could cut it by 50 percent and we could cut also by 50 percent of the china might join in later. if they feel like we think this is a good initiative. and we will come to a discussion here. the trump is also impose 25 percent duties on steel and aluminum inputs from countries. and there was a time when we used to work pretty well with the us and aluminum trade. what do you think of such a trade policy issues and such, you come into the study. i wouldn't like to comment along with the trade policy off the united states for many years and it has been linked to sanctions. we can see those sanctions, illegitimate and council for global commerce. and the economy in my views becomes

both of the 10 that was between both of those sections, nationalism successful that and trade policy of escalated trades viewed just texas . and so once every country is free to decide what is beneficial to you and what does not get the logic behind, getting the manufacturing back home, creating jobs, junior, i think tax revenue for whole levels of the fiscal system. and so at some point, so such actions will bumps into certainly difficulties related to inflation. pressure drawing come onto the price of insole on. well, let's leave that to experts. they'll tell use these details pollution as for the medium in 2017, there's no rush accounted for some 15 percent of america's entire aluminum team. unfortunately, most of 15 percent of americans, human them came from rush in fact, and if memory serves me well, the u. s. makes 60 percent on their entire aluminum consumption. well, 40 percent is important to 50 percent of that used to come from the russian

federation center. today. the key import is kenneth to see if a decision is made to open the american markets to reduce us. since we could sell approximately 2000000 tons of the us market. so this would not have a significant impact on the pricing. but in my view, it would still have a restraining effect on prices and that's not the lives of them. from the model over and most importantly, i believe we could work together with american companies in this field. for example, back in soviet times we have plans to build a new hydro electric power station teams across the street and create additional telemundo production facilities. and they're all leaving them is primarily about energy, preferably cheap energy, and it's either, mo is both inexpensive hands on the environmental friendly. so these plans have been around since august the 9th. that however, would be a capital intensive offense, investments heavy projects with some preliminary estimates,

habits cost that somewhere around $15000000.00 at the base prices. but we can conceive of these possibilities. yes, because us presidents policy is focused on bringing productions back to the united states. however, if american companies operate in our country, this would also speak to major benefit as those companies would sit on solid and profits, and significant volumes of human, you wouldn't enter of a domestic market and at affordable market prices. so it's very something to think about here. so just as there is in the joint x direction of money under those metals, as well as in other areas including and that you choose. i saw a few minutes ago, i read another news report from the u. s. way president trump stated that the us and russia are discussing major economic projects. yes, some of our companies are in contact with each other and discussing such projects. thank you very much. thank you.

the, the, the, the, the, the page the cut, the annual, i guess,

hopefully down to the does that bottle, is it on some last that is a sign you know the rest of your activity on the any of the we show you the solution pretty she is doing much to it, the frustrated lives here. so the whole thing, you know, choke student video, couple natural. sure. cool. i seen really is, what additional se saw the the see the silver, the somebody how can it be that um the ship to the middle east from a country whose top officials constantly complain about shortages of munitions and

military equipments through a little bit of boss and low cream and maybe a little in your system and below grade level nominal facility or some of those other staff we, i'm about the easiest to to not meet with someone else. no. yeah, well, i'm an easy somebody remember bubble, the sold will not gone on the level why are weapons from ukraine spreading over the world? to turn this country into a major arms hub, will continue to bolster ukraine's and forces by rushing them a capabilities that they need to defend their country. the everyone knows very well that we don't sell but known as pineapples or any kind of children's toys. we sell weapons. yes, we're also known in the world as homes dealers, that we must not be ashamed of that the look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a

robot must obey the orders given by human beings accept. we're such orders at conflict with the 1st law show your mind, anticipation. we should be very careful about our professional intelligence at the point, obviously is to great trust, rather than to the various mean with artificial intelligence. we have somebody in the team and the robot must protect this phone. existence was on the

the, if you was thinking about russia, what is your mind the picture? the landscapes open up before your eyes. the last one does the, the discount starts the journey, the the you ready to come along the

stuff for the summer shift for the picture day such as you the sheet of the day our daughter should do this vehicle? is it the economic model have us defined what happens if it is experiments you, if it doesn't take her to testify this concept august, even though is a new model of the old server. it's a compliance, i'm bill gage goes up developing bio, chemical weathers inside of the guns. go too much noise and cheap. but the reason why the white glove service cost is because of the savings just the or

the united states. could you reduce its defense budget by 50 percent, and we could reduce it by 50 percent and china, what van joined, if it wanted to put a lot of mirror pohden backs, the idea of massively flashing defense, that things are diffused, global tension. and the response to a proposal by donald from the russian president also weighs in on the rush for rarer with a pitch to consider joint projects with the us. and the idea is echoed by the american presence for world peace. and last thing the wes appears to be drifting further away from europe on your policy.