the desk told the more than $4000.00 is likely to rise. is this something that these people continue to recover that funerals like this one likely to be repeated as it come to deals with the often most of as well as war. the people have a wounded but not defeated unless they pay their respects to the dates they've vinyl to continue to fight to their living and to defend that land. this is steve sweeney for all t n. i to the southern level by author dot com is where you can get far the details of all the stories were following this. ok, thanks for watching. by now the i'm actually on retention. welcome to going underground rule cussing around the

world from the you a of to friday, scheduled visit to the white house by zalinski or his donald trump, calls him the dictator of ukraine zalinski off to seeing maybe a 1000000 of his people killed is now officially signed away a defeated ukraine's resources to the usa. well, this up to funding visits to trump from polish, french and british class of state leaders who run countries without freedom. according to us, vice president j. d funds to moxie, the anniversary of rushes moved deliberate down. yes, cocky glass on your hands, because i evans ever read your the usa and rush. i voted to the un against public countries like britain, france, and germany. much of the world is united against any economic lead, suicide, or european rump. if you raise your hand that prompted to slash social spending and pull money into wolf or the country of hamlet, denmark suggested peace was more dangerous than war. and britons against thomas signal sending most of the british army to the fact to fight russia. all this while west asia tried to cope with a video posted by trump depicting human netanyahu composing over the bones of the

biden genocide in gaza. and moscow again is the form of the attendant kindled in this obvious and rushing non forces. talk to the imagery, training these on russians born and defense policy council, to present in conway. so good that a russian on the show of to so many people from the american side, you know, we had the trump, the deputy assistant on the other day semester and gorka. so i mean, trump has been saying often on it's possible, there is some presence of west and european nato troops allowed in ukraine. and the 2nd level of the foreign minister said, no. so what will happen to the soldiers if they turn up their, i mean, right now they're in my 6, they're in british special forces in ukraine. what will happen to these troops, if they turn up the well, you're free, help them to come without rushes approval, which is not forthcoming as, as we see,

they may become targets for russian strikes. and that would involve the, those countries into a direct and immediate military conflict where the russian federation, i hope that the, the rulers of european country is considered as seriously because. busy it's too long before it's too late, but you've been seeing what's being coming out of the mouths of these european deletes, increasingly on popular with their own populations in recent weeks. they clearly see rusher as the enemy. they believe russia has designs on london and paris, and they seem to think that the by, even separating from the united states, they can take on russia as well. i'm not quite sure of the last thing just send because of the presence of european forces in ukraine.

hypothetical at this point was predicated by european leaders on the support of the united states. so, and they're all in all need. those europeans would want to have american back, and this is something that's present. trump is at least for now. unwilling to extend. and i don't think frankly that this position of the american president will change, but we're seeing so many reckless moves by the europeans during this war. the to essentially made them almost direct participants in the conflict. and they're helping was the warning director. busy them by president fulton, last year when they were on the verge of the supply and your grade

was long range, missiles, and those missiles indeed were supply. although they were used to more or less and they in the was own go, not striking much deeper into russian in most cases. but i do not trust the european leaders personally. whereas making a, you know, serious decisions about the above military matters. i think that. busy many of what they decide upon is a, is reckless and laden with lots of risks for their own countries. and though that, that is because so much concern. clearly based on that was people execute a stomach that they know worried that of fragment of the russian nuclear deterrent . but then you as a mosque was able to trust with verification, washington to a certain degree. and of course as

a timeliness to this. what's the point of any signed agreement? if your opinion leaders continue to be the way they are? oh, just the, the russian leadership and the russian government think that you are both full in line as they normally do as puppet states of washington. because at the moment they, they seem to be at odds with washington. and there is that there is that bump of your raise you between russia and the atlantic ocean and the united states as well. i think that at the end of the day, the europeans will have no alternative but to side with washington or follow washington. they don't have resources that they don't have the will for an independent security policy and independent for and policy in the to a sense of the word and the options or presence of american backing for the risk. a potential risk it moves in ukraine is

critical for them. so i think that um, they will rather not challenge washing done on that issue because the washington will be put in an uncomfortable position when dis, a european forces are deployed in ukraine and then they, their locations and their base is engaged, but by the russian forces washington will face a very difficult challenge which i never to respond to and they involve themselves america, that is a goal united stage into a bowl, a real with russia or a band it sure european major allies choice. the prism trump certainly would want to avoid. so yeah,

clearly there is talk of withdrawal of us troops occupying groups from western europe. but trump is wielding a degree of leverage against something economic leverage against east west and european countries. for other reasons. russia though, and we've been covering on this program over the past 3 years, was paying zalinski for the rent of the pipeline usage for gas into western europe and is supplying energy still to west and europe have. when is rest, you're going to sanction the countries of western europe? well, i don't say i would, i wouldn't bet on that of europe may eventually sanction russia. and they're completely cut off those that never stay something here at the union that are still getting gas from russia. that would be a risky move in terms of the integrity and unit. sorry to interrupt the advice that off the black market then because it needs the energy con,

supply of old united states on supply all of it. they have to they to a desperate for originally energy. right? they find as the russian war, in fact, london, breland and paris will let them say what they want to say. but the pressure does need the fluid exchange. and uh, it has to be not here, the very openly in russia, the after cutting off a gas supplies to or other we're rolling material supplies to a, to the rest of the world that end up in, in western countries would not be uh, you know, a small move by russia. so yes, so there is, um, a certain degree of how shall i put it in consistency in this whole thing. but we're dealing with whether they, to call it a strange wall or a wall with the unconventional features. there is no war

declared in ukraine. there is the diplomatic relations have not been officially broken just then no embassies of the 2 countries, the course of relations between russia and europe that are in a, in a proxy war situation or the united states for that matter. still continued uh, throughout the 3 years of the war. yeah. it's a little bit strange for the working classes of russian, though. is it the beginning russians and these are your being weapons. so when the neutrons are germany says he wants to send the new tours me so he means aiming to murder decalle russians. that's the old id, are in love, these russian parts of western european pods, a dad to actually target inside russia rather than the battle as well. that is, that is true. and in my view of strikes deep and inside russia,

by your european or with, with, with your initials. and we know that such strikes cannot proceed without the support of the nations that are provided those items. so they are essentially the same is of the trigger, a cigarette delay and sometimes uh, literally speaking, and up to that go through an attribution. and they help invoices the russian, many voices, persistent voices that argue that the russia should not be only targeting those ukrainians. that uh, formerly in charge of those missiles, but to pay back to those forces in europe that are behind those on sales, those of deliveries. and that intelligence delivered to recreate that enables the create the invoices to strike interruption that never materialize, which is presumably why london, for instance,

is not fragments of russia and continues to talk up war and the mass killing of russians as a, as a kind of juicy i'm not sure the use of western european nations can actually launch things without the american satellites. and this guy, you know, in any sense, in any other, any other way they don't have the technology, arguably. but how isolated then is this western european area movie. so russia and the united states voting the same way that you and how isolated you expect your up to be. and that's why i kind of said, maybe version sanctions on west in europe would be, would be not seen as, as a place given. most of the rest of the world appears to think west and europe is the only thing standing between a washer and ukraine and a peace deal as well. i think it's still too early to, to uh, to say that the united states has completely changed its cost on ukraine or on

russia. yes, we have seen that a unique case of the united states citing with russia against the european union during a major vote in the united nations. yes, we have seen some, we've heard some vibes coming from the white house that suggests that i think the approach may be changing, but we went out there yet and there's a lot of uncertainty about the future moves and us russian relations and future moves. and us policy to work toward russia and, and us involvement in ukraine is also something that, that is subject. it's subject to change or it's going, it's going to preserve some of the elements of the old approach. i would say that

we need to be a little bit cautious when we uh, when we shut out what uh, what, what concrete changes have been wrought sofa by a donald trump and where he may go. yep. from a field trip down to meet your janet and i'll stop you. the more from a member of russia's for an indefensible, as it counts, a lot of us by the there's no end in sight over how you're going to continue to destroy the earth. is the case for the med, most of the people. i tried to go to the gym, but i'm certainly not ready to fight russia. this is also of soon. this is the 3rd world lunacy re washing as for so the funder line likes to say, we have the tools while we just start with stability and business deal. so what

should be living on that we have very close propaganda. you know, a price gear in your i think we don't know the aftermath any time that you're not allowed to ask questions, you should ask all of the questions. the more questions ask the better the answer is will be the welcome back to going undergrad. i'm still here with a former director of the county, the most cassandra now member of russia's foreign and defense policy council doctor dimitri training doctor trend, and you were expressing caution at the end of the one about the trump policy. these are the russia ukraine. i mean, i've got to ask you whether uh, in the light of the fee is clearly that he's pursuing some sort of imagine re nick sony in line. i mean it's that is that because the trump administration doesn't really appreciate the times of change and the tone to between badging and most cool can no longer be split apart, like richard nixon did as well. i think so blunt,

also from trump's 1st step, dr. whitehouse not a frontal attack on the side. no russian relationship would yield few if any results. so the they're likely to get smiled at this time. but surely they uh, they believe in the white house today that it is a tier launch degree. the fault of the bite administration that took on china and russia simultaneously, that venturing and moscow had been able to forge a fairly close relationship for trump. it's no longer the uh, the, the gable, but uh, id, ologies, it's no longer uh the collective west. uh, united by a liberal globalist ideology. we're taking along the quote unquote or sorry,

diary of east uh with that russia and china to full because they look at china and russia as a 2 bed, 2 separate entities. they want to push you different policies to reach american objectives in each case except, sorry to interrupt for that except for all the transaction is i'm of the trumpet ministration. he was clear about bricks and they clearly express a desperate fear in the early days after 0 the ration of amy move away from the use of the dollars. so he's very aware of a new world order that is imagine as uh, i think he is, but uh, the move away, something dollar is something that is uh, is happening in rushes. relations with a lot of countries, simply simply because russia has been borrowed from the global

dollar based financial market. and russia has been using a national guard. and since it has been using the rubel and it's uh, it shifts business transactions with, with a lot of countries. and even the zap is, is often the problem including it, rushes relations with china with regard to come on bricks colored. and she, i don't think we are anywhere near that. yeah, that's the point rusher. wasted. it's time food in wasted. the time that was available to the russian federation to speed this process up. because right now, none of those bricks countries are going to want to oppose the united states that will be seen to opposing the united states by turning to non dollar trade because it will be subject to 100 percent tires as well. that's, that's true. but it's also true that even before trump, there was fairly little headway that was made in that direction within bricks. um,

china with its, uh, enormous uh, volume of trade relations with the united states and uh, the european union is simply not uh, interested in, uh, risking its a position in both of those giants markets by doing something that would be with the scene as a inimical to the dollar and then it goes to the existing site national system. uh, similarly for india. so its, uh, the relationship relations within bricks. uh, interesting, but uh, it's not always that the, the member states of the group that takes, that has expanded recently that they, that the members of the group see i to, i, among themselves with regard to the major economic issues in financial issues.

so we were talking about uh, with the, with the bricks. we're talking about payments instruments. we're talking about making payments. a systems work in a, in the situation when one of the major members of the group for either brochure is essentially ejected. trump the global financials. yeah. but that's an advantage arguably, and that would be an all you be an excuse. i mean, it sounds like incompetence that during these 3 years, this arrangement wasn't sped up. i mean, what you're actually saying, i suppose is that trump has bought a new lease of life for american hegemony. perhaps even allowing to make the mineral deal with the russia over the contract, from preferential mineral rights in east and ukraine, which you'd normally have don't rush who would be making a deal with china or of the require a quiet territories would be great as well. uh, tempest changing uh is changing the model of american hegemony is not. uh,

he is not canceling american hegemony. he wants it to be more efficient to your one . so to got a spending a wants to uh, subsidize, the america's allies in the truck. that's not your money by that's a multi polar. well, that is smarter than about my brochure. the issue is it's just a rush. it hasn't been up to the muck in russia is, uh, is, is, is what it is today. we can sometimes in uh, shrinking imagine that russia is a, is a soviet union in cottage, but the soviet union was accountable for about some people say, uh, one 5th and the others. 161 7th of the global g d p, especially is know where that, that point today. but she'll get your name had the mikey industry that turned out

lots of goes a different value in quality. but many of those goods. what failed to good. and it had a major technological complex that booked the soviet science and technology close to the top of the world. we are in a different position today. we're trying to do better with trying to win back the technological solve and do that. the soviet union had and i think that the war has a, has pushed us much further than we otherwise would have would have been able to cover the adults. yeah. by ip be are ahead of dr. matthew that somehow with web bigger than that. but we are, yeah, by pvp though, and that seems to be the new indicator of the notional gdp. arguably, what about all these 93 countries? um, i don't know best will states around the world that didn't catch up in time for that

united nations vote. and seem to be still voting with the old, colonial, most as in, in london and paris. will it take time for all of us, all states, all around the world to understand that it is no need for the rest of phobia or any more because there must is at the i am after world bank the w 2. i don't the way to the future of any of these multi lateral organizations. they, they don't, they want peace now, unlike these isolated western european pause portion of the, of, as well. um, you said russell states. uh but um, you know, internet as well. of course, the only a handful of countries that can truly enjoy sovereignty. and even that southern g is only partial. many of the country is that uh your venture door, lets say many,

many within the 93 that you venture depend on uh, one way in one way or another on uh, the europeans. uh, some would still depend uh many of which delta dental united states, including the europeans, but the united states. uh at this point has uh, not tried to, to uh to make sure that all its vassal states would vote with, with the u. s. united states. uh, did not uh, the, uh, the on the europeans did not give an order to its vassals, to use your language, to make sure that they aligned themselves with the met with a new american position. the united states has just changed its own position and is arguing, uh, with, with, went to europe is about the wisdom of that position. so it's not,

as it's not as simple as the does, it does it sometimes as, as, as it's something i know sometimes it looks also let me, let me underline one important issue. many of the country is uh of the, with the bricks group, including china and india did not vote with russia on that very important issue of the chinese of the in just abstain. they have their own reasons why they upstate, you know that, but they've always been abstaining on the, on, on that issue of probably because of the issue of jo doyle, integrity of national sovereignty involved ability board as is a, is an issue that resumes very much in their own countries and their own societies. but the truth is that the countries whom you would include normally among russians,

best partners and firms are still taking a neutral stance on the, on the very important issue. very important for russian. yeah, i presume president she and by minister moody, a tipped off, a president, putin, about that you didn't get ortega of nicaragua. it should be known as well as the president of eritrea. what happens and all the russians preparing for not only in 4 years time when trump goes. but if trump is killed, there will be an assassination attempt already. because so much of it seems to revolve around one figure who is dismantling this so called deep state to the united states, which has tried to destroy democracy all around the world so that as opposed russian interests chinese interest. i'm interested in this is remarkable. it's, it's, it's truly remarkable. they, there she a power of

a one brushing and the us there was a joke. uh, 30 plus years ago when the soviet union, i trust, introduced a deposition of a president. and a russian journalist, a sub jo can be that the typing present of the president of the soviet union was as absurd as a title of the 8 shaw of the united states of america. to that the donald trump, just what 5 weeks, 6 weeks after his inauguration has behaved more like us all in america and very interestingly as not being much opposed to happen. if your portable things are they happen if you know the statements by this, the state officials in the, in the us. but otherwise has been more or less running. but that's very little

opposition within, within the united states. if, if something happens to trump, of course, the american constitution provides for the vice president to take all but in that sense of the uh, the assassination of trump. prior to the election. um, what else? uh, knocked out. uh mike, you should go buy 2 political sake uh uh, leaving a void in his place. uh today if something god forbid happens to donald trump, it will be succeeded. you close by uh, by j uh by j d. thats demetrius having kind of a lot of stuff with the both the guy and he is all right. kind of have to stop at the you know, always be general. secondly to us. no. thank you very much. go ahead and try that. i thank you. you're welcome. that's it for this year. i will be back on monday with the quincy institute for responsible state graft professor out at all leaving. but

until then came into trouble. i social media. if it's on sense, i'm your country and that drive channel going, you're going to be hon dot com to let you know that it's such a going undergrad. see him under the right now or one son is neglected. there's a need not to a bundle noble understand because my fear is that it was due to the bottom dollar amount is one point o when i was son, was neglected, and $911.00 happened the the

attack cut off sovereignty with the past and really reacts to an attempted ukrainian problems, dry con, they took stream pipeline and solving russia vital to hunger, ease, gas supplies, the big trouble. no, no, they've done a lot of talking. your country is in big trouble. i know you're not. you're not winning this. less the white house and more the fight house. okay. all depends on the oval office. has a meeting, a finding, a way forward for your grade, ends in a shouting match. and a deal on rap minerals apparently did the trash or rallying for the cold romanians to take to the streets of book correcting the.