[000:00:00;00] the, the, this plan to introduce peacekeepers into ukraine is a continuation of the incitement of the camp regime to wage a war against us. no european troops on the ground in ukraine, and that's the message from russia stop. this nevada actually discusses the piece. those says and ties with the us following, but it was the last piece. oval office comp price meeting, the big trouble. oh no, no. okay. not a lot of talking. your country is in big trouble. i know you're not, you're not winning this som, to deliver some mohammed troops as the shut down any hopes of we do sending kids emissions in washington crumbling. how do you come in?

so someone, when you are practically begging them for money and assistance, when you are wholly dependent on the largest of the american people, and then walk into their white house and their oval office. and try to be argumentative and insulting. in fact, checking usual blocks all a supplies from entering guys that has shut my eyes, reject. so us proposal to restore peace in the war to on regents the coverage of the latest trends shaping the world right now. this is our team to national i a, michael porter. all right, no european peacekeeping troops and ukraine after the war ends. and that's the message from the russian foreign minister. i figure love. also, he also assessed the restoration of ties between moscow in washington and spoke about his own personal opinion. now, donald trump,

the new equipment there is little, but then there was no preliminary work. the call happened on the initiative of donald trump during the telephone conversation upon his suggestion, they agreed to meet and re odds. we flew there 3 days after the phone call. so there was no preparation. i mean, in a bilateral sense, of course, each team was preparing, we had the foreign ministry and they at their state department. it was a completely normal conversations between the 2 delegations. the scottish in thing is that the normality was seen as a sensation. this means that our western partners during jo biden's time in the office were able to bring global public opinion to the point where a normal conversation was seen as something extraordinary. we will never think the same way on every issue of world politics. we recognize this and re odds and the

americans have recognized this. they actually set it themselves, where we see a convergence of interest common sense suggests that it is foolish not to use this in order to translate it into some practical matters and get mutually beneficial results. where interest do not coincide as us secretary of state, marco rubio also said it is the responsibility of responsible powers to prevent this discrepancy from degenerating into confrontation. this is absolutely our position to but i'm on public schools of trump. he's a pragmatist. that's what he believes in common sense. he means this and sees a transition to a different way of doing things. but the goal is all the same to make america great again. trump has done everything that he promised. this is giving such

a lively human character to politics. so that's why it's interesting to work with him. his team includes marco rubio and national security advisor mike waltz. they are absolutely competent peoples in every sense of the word they speak based on the fact that they don't command us. and we don't command them or quotes. it's just the 2 serious countries sat down to talk about what was wrong with them and what a predecessor had done in 4 years. destroying all channels of contact without exception, imposing a number of sanctions, followed by the expulsion of american companies, incurring losses of hundreds of billions of dollars of the just following biden's term. there are now people who want to lead with common sense. they say directly that they want to end all wars, they want peace, you who demands

a continuation of the gravy train with the war. europe, french president, my crohn is running around with some ideas just like british p. m. cure storm or just they say that so many thousands of peacekeepers are being trained and they will provide them with air cover. that is arrogance. first of all, no one is asking us president donald trump understands everything. he said it was too early to say when a settlement would take place. you can discuss this issue, but you will need the agreement of all parties to behaves correctly with this plan . to introduce peacekeepers into ukraine is a continuation of the incitement of the care of regina to wage a war against us. those guys trampled on the men sk agreements. they admitted that quite recently their co authors, our western neighbors were not going to comply with them. and having also issued weapons, they brought to power with their band that's petrol power. shank go and then flattening mirrors the lensky. they were the ones who encouraged him to turn

a 180 degrees. although maybe the german 4 administer and a lean, a buyer box, would have regarded this as 360 degrees flooding their zalinski, turned a 180 degrees from a man who came to power on the slogans a piece on the slogans of lead the russian language alone, this is our common language, our common culture that's on the internet. and in 6 months, he turned into a nazi and as russian president vladimir put incorrectly said into a trader of the jewish people, just as they brought him to power on paying nets and pushed them forward. they now also want to prompt him up with their band that's in the form of peace keeping units. so certainly from what that would mean the root causes would not disappear. when we ask these thinkers, what hypothetically would happen to the parts that they would take control of the answer that ukraine would remain there. i asked one of my comrades, will the russian language be banned there?

he didn't say anything. they can't utter a word of condemnation for what has happened to no other language has been subjected to such aggression, but it doesn't show useful. the world is still absorbing. the fallout from this week's dramatic oval office showed down after the devil called the us national security advice that shed light on the washington the decision to declare logged into zaleski and his delegation that's not long brought to ordering them to leave immediately. how do you come in salt? someone when you are practically begging them for money and assistance? when you're wholly dependent on the lark, asked to be american people, and then walk into their white house and their oval office. and try to be argumentative and insulting. in fact checking, so we made that clear and no uncertain terms. we made it clear that the negotiation which could have been a fantastic day for them and the country was over and that it was time to go. he

had an opportunity, do apologize. he had an opportunity to say that he, you know, is, is absolutely in favor of hitting the reset button and moving this deal forward. but that's not what we heard. now what was supposed to be according to my was a fantastic day for ukraine, turned out to be a fantastic day for the news instead. here is a recap of what was going on in the white house. what makes america a good country? is america engaging in diplomacy? that's what president trump's doing. can ask you. sure. yeah, yeah. okay. so what do you mean? i'm talking about the kind of diplomacy it is going to in the destruction of your country with respect, i think it's disrespectful for you to come to the oval office. try to litigate this in front of the american media. we're trying to solve a problem. don't tell us what we're going to feel. i'm not telling you as far as the issue i checked the year in no position didn't dictate what we're going to fail

. you, again, the use of people seeing you gambling with world war 3 and what you're doing is very dis, written disrespectful to the country. this country. i'm the you that to you are more that a lot of people said where they should have. you've got into big trouble. so no, no. okay, not a lot of talking. your country is in big trouble. i know you're not really oh, you're not winning this from the very beginning of the war. we've been a long and we sample. i said, thanks. you have the these can we gave you the president, 350000000000 dollar you will you for your military equipment, then you tell us, i don't want to cease fire. i don't want to cease fire is that was with the a guy named bite and who is not a smart person. this is going to be great television. i will say, when's the last key was unceremoniously given the boot from the white house of questions have now been raised in washington as to where all the billions of

dollars sent to you? craig actually went and that's what the new f b i chief would like to know. so i asked this congress to be to investigate. whereas this money gotten, the american people are oh, that answer because it's our money. our taxes are now and there's a lot of really good reason to be concerned because, you know, you, the, you claim was known as a, you know, place for of corruption a place for money laundering. yeah. it's not like we set a $1000000000.00 as if that was even a small number to begin with. right? we sent a 100 times that to one country. i don't know how this congress is allowed to get away with it. but let's get some more on this now and speak to gray zone, the editor in chief, max blumenthal, max, i'm happy to have you join me now. great to be here. great. i know you've been following all the developments just like the whole citizen, some around the well as it is the new f b i chief,

wants to congress to check and ask to know where the money is to you, create all the baby and have gone. what do you expect out of this? well, as a lensky himself wants to know where the money went. he complained in interviews with pod, castor, lex, friedman, and other figures that a 175000000000 had been given to his country and half of it has disappeared. he doesn't know where it went. so that's one reason why donald trump and ged vance were pushing forward and association of hostilities between ukraine and rusher. because this is becoming unpopular among the, for the american taxpayer, at least a plurality of americans. and a majority of republicans have concluded that the united states has given too much to ukraine for too little because it's losing on the battlefield. and the acknowledgements are coming in every day on the pages of the papers that have been the biggest cheerleaders for the war. so where did the money go? well, it went back to the belt way. it went to the contractors. it went to the belt way,

bandits. it went to the arms industry. we know that, but it also went to, as samantha power, openly acknowledged when she was the director of us say i did pay for ukrainian pensioners, ukrainian school teachers and cranny, and medical workers. while the american public is suffering economic pain were many americans can't even afford a creative eggs. so this is just it. what was the trump administration? puts it all on the table for the american public transparency about where this money went. it will be a brilliant p r move because they will understand how they were taken, taken for a new cold war racket designed to in the words of the rand corporation extend russia. but what did it do for the average american? all right, the, the us secretary of commerce has said that the message to zelinski is clear and

that he wouldn't get any american monies unless he's there for peace and the on the things right now, we're going to see the us ending all supports and assessments. you agree? well, it is very clear that the trump administration means business here that they want negotiations. i don't know what the systems del suspend, it's pretty clear that europe cannot filled a gap there backfill during the height of the conflict when the by the ministration was backing zelinski to the hill was not sufficient. so zelinski is going to have to come to the table and it's trump said he's going to have to apologize. and this is the land skis fault and the by the administration's fault. if you look at the display in the white house, everyone, all zalinski is cheerleaders. and before she deliberately interventionists in washington and the chinese and so on, the mic falls,

they're all claiming this was an ambush. wasn't an ambush. if you watch the full 15 minutes, it's nothing really takes place until 40 minutes in. when is the lensky begins to express hostility to j. d. advances call for diplomacy? and that is the lensky that we have seen since 2019, when he began to openly flaunt the men's good chords, starting in paris in december 2019, and carrying all the way through into the war. when he flouted the stand bull, the track of negotiations, which his own advisor uh our stove, which said was very good. we have the words of alexander charlie who was an negotiator for ukraine, who said we managed to find a very real compromise. we were very close in the middle of april, to finalize our war with some peaceful settlement. and that putting in his words,

tried to do everything possible to and conclude an agreement with ukraine. but to the lensky could not abide by any such agreement, because would mean number one and 2 is international fame. it would mean an end to him as this singular figure held as the freedom fighter on the front lines of democracy. no potential nobel prize winner. and it would mean an end to his rule, potentially in ukraine because of negotiation for giving away up the dumbass region where it zalinski had previously refused to hold elections. along with crimea would mean ukraine reduced to a run state, internal combustion of ukraine's extremely incendiary politics. with neo nazi factions, potentially gunning for zalinski. and so as a lensky had to keep the war going indefinitely. and he was entitled left to the state of entitlement by the, by the administration,

which had been fueling this from the beginning. and so he was unable to grasp the reality that he was in or the fact that as trump accurately said, he had no cards left to play. and therefore, zalinski is now left whimpering in europe, where he is actually being lectured by the europeans on some kind of alternative solution. we'll see what they come up with. and just to ensure though, right now i will, we have to essentially, we have time to talk about the european perspective to all of this. now, when asked if trump once that lands key to resign, the us national security advisor said they want the ukranian and they kinda engage with what he's saying. that means they want a neutral ukraine. that's what they want. that's what would have served ukrainians best as even um our storage alexi our storage, the landscapes, former advisor, concluded that you know, their failure to accept the is den ball piece initiative cost hundreds of thousands

of lives. he said, hundreds of thousands of people would be alive if we had accepted that early on back in 2022. so the only way to get back to that and to stop the bleeding is a neutral ukraine. but who can come in and fill the void? that's something the trump administration doesn't have an answer to. this is the lensky eliminated. dimitri med venture is form arrival at the urging of the u. s. and he's now in russia after being tortured by the s. b, u. so there's no opposition left, a new grain. thousands of dissidents are in jail. is going to have to be some kind of internal process for bringing ukrainian politics back to back to normal after this catastrophe. but the trump administration doesn't have an answer for who can replace the lensky? someone will have to rise to the surface to preserve what's left to the ukrainian state. all right we,

we have seen european lead is meeting with the last q when he left washington that seems to have mentioned and we have heart the us secretary of state say that he hasn't heard or seen any plan from the european, the allies as to how to in the war a do you think that going to be in the planning from from the you easily does generally on how to end the war. ringback they are there, there. they have announced that they are putting their, asking zelinski now to agree to their plan to end the war. what this means is very unclear to me because you've heard these of the seemingly insane statements from the incoming german chancellor frederick murtz about, you know, the germany leading the world with, with no, you, without any us partner donald task,

declaring that's fine. 500 europeans don't need 300000000 americans to tell them how to stand up to a 150000000 russians. as of u. d, u and europe is united, and it's not actually a collection of too many cooks and a broken dysfunctional kitchen which relies totally on us economic power in the world post world war to order. they don't want so they don't have a plan. they knows the landscape can't wait on the battlefield. they're not willing to commit troops. they don't have any troops. they gave up their troops after the cold war. their troops are doing like flash mob dances on twitter and tick tock. it's ridiculous. so ultimately, the lensky will either have to apologize to donald trump and come back to the table at, or he will no longer be leader, and he'll be living next door to netanyahu's, son at a luxury condo in miami. and this is all the fault. i mean, this is something that the us and the europeans knew what happened. they saw ukrainian men,

especially lower class working class men as nothing but me to throw into the slaughterhouse to extend russia. going back to that 2019 ran court paper, which really laid out a blueprint for this war that the, by the administration wanted ukraine to fight. that paper contains a warning that i'm of that over arming ukraine or nato wise in ukraine. and this is the exact words of that paper, might also come at a significant cost to ukraine, that could produce disproportionately large ukrainian casualties, territorial losses, and refugee flows. it might even lead ukraine into a disadvantage. disadvantageous piece. well, that's happening right now off before our eyes and they knew it was going to happen . well, a lot of questions are being asked right now when, because we have always known the collective west just down together on all global issues. right now we have seen european need is pledging that continues on wavering

support for ukraine. but what can they, what are they capable of doing without the the united states when he come to fueling the ukrainian military? what scenarios are you looking at with these, these european leaders that are still pushing for war? cannot explain in a plausible way how you crank and wait on the battlefield and they know or lose. but they themselves have no alternative because their own credibility and viability as part of a wider regime which has been imposed on europe by the post world war to trans atlantic order by washington with london as a junior partner is at stake as well. and so the credibility of nato itself stands in the balance, and they have no alternative. they have no way of going back on this bore, which they believe was

a substantial for nato's continued expansion. and they cannot imagine, and nato that doesn't continually expand. and then they, they, their existence also depends entirely on one power mafia in washington, which is out of power, not just executive power, but power in the congress power and the supreme court power and the judiciary. so they are at a loss for a strategy that power mafia is represented by the democratic party and a faction of the republicans that is waning with in the american electorate. that kind of never trump, or is represented by george w bush and liz cheney. so they're, they're, they're just flailing right now and the power mafia in washington that's out of power. if we listen to the words of michael mcfall, who was one of their key voices on russia, he is warned that if the united states in europe do not continue to sustain this war against russia through ukraine,

then taiwan might actually decide to negotiate with china instead of continuing to arm up and that this could do grave damage to us empire in the long run. so that's why they want to keep using slavic meat to throw in to the slaughter house in order to extend russia because they're afraid about the loss of their imperium. in the long run. all i see and then bins the blame of what happened in the white house on some ends vans and the lo street at that through a pole that's vague, conducted on the website of one of the host. now the one days how representative is such a polar on the view of what americans or how the americans view of what's going on as well. cnn is part of the power mafia that is out of power and now which has been vanquished. and in many ways discredited by the re election of donald trump,

cnn doesn't matter as much as it used to. and i think the trump administration understands that uh what cnn is doing is cherry picking and, and it, this honestly editing the exchange that took place because the american public for understandable reasons, most members of it don't have the time to watch the full 15 minute exchange and they haven't been provided with the facts on what ukraine actually is. and why this conflict started. they don't, they haven't been told that ukraine is simply a proxy. and that zalinski cannot exist without their funding. and they don't understand how ukraine was substantially nato wise. in order to provoke russia into conflict, but that is changing over time because fewer and fewer americans watch cnn. they're turning more to alternative media to pod cast, including pro trump podcasts like joe rogan and opinion is shifting. and then

we just have the we, you can look at the, the pattern of american support for wars. the us support for the iraq war was almost total, even though it was based entirely on this information. and once the body bags came home and this information faded, the american public completely turned against it in by 2006. george w bush's approval rating was in the low twenty's. that's the process we're undergoing right now. we're the american public sort of waking up from the propaganda and trump's position on this proxy war will continue to strengthen over time. all right, donald trump junior re posted a video of, of, of, of conscription, sat in the mobilizations in, in ukraine. and commentators express us todd surprise and disbelief of what they saw up give us an idea how. where are the american people in public about what is

really going on on the streets and in ukraine generally. what is the point of a proxy war, or the hybrid war that the american national security state prefers, is that the american public are unable to see the human dimension. because we're using a proxy, we're using slobs who cares about them. they're dying, but they're dying for freedom. we'll just, we'll just, uh, we'll accept a few of them into our hospitals and you know, a few amputees into our hospitals and pat ourselves on the back for standing up against the evil putting. but this was the 1st time that the american public have seen a national leader in the form of vice president jdw events actually stand up for the poor and working class. you craney and men who have been shoved into vans by military police to be sent into the meat grinder. and that was an amazing moment.

and now through twitter acts and other social media platforms, that legacy media outlets like cnn can't control their seeing. the reality that these young man have to go through being shoved into the vans and it's horrifying. so this will continue to be a road public opinion in support of this proxy words they finally see the human dimension and how many lives have been wasted by the lensky who refused to accept the simple peace initiatives. in defiance of even his own advisors and negotiators . as our storage said, when hundreds of thousands of people would still be alive today, unless you're all right, tom administration insist that there is still a chance to restore relations with zelinski if he apologizes. is this something you see in the coming days that could happen? well that's, i think the landscape got either got no advice or terrible advice going into that

meeting and that he regrets not accepting the deal on the table for some minerals, which was a pretty bad deal. and an imperialist deal to be sure. i don't see how the lensky moves forward and remains president for the next several months without apologizing and accepting some kind of deal with the united states. i just don't see it, however, the landscape might fear that if he does accept the deal, then the hardcore warriors, who have done so much of the fighting and dying on the front lines in the 3rd regiment, formerly known as the as of battalion, are going to a gun for him, put a target on his back for betraying them, and betraying their the war that they wanted to fight for the band dearest ideology . and for the glory of the, of the, the,

the white empire that they wanted to build in eastern europe against the mosque of light bolshevik chords. that's a reality that zalinski faces. and it may be influencing some of the decisions that might seem more irrational in the eyes of the american public. all right, we have to leave you here now, max blumenthal, the brazen editor in chief. thank you so much for your time and insight. thanks for having me right now to the middle east. now he's role has stopped. ok. many terry and aid from entering gaza and that's according to prime minister benjamin netanyahu, who blames the move on her minds rejecting the us plan to extend the crucial cx. 5, seals, a lot of others with the completion of phase one, and in light of a mazda is rejection of the wind cause outline we decided in a discussion last night that starting this morning, o entry of goods and supplies into gaza will be prohibited,

and it must be emphasized that how mosse is being taken. control of all supplies and goods sent to gaza. it is abusing causes populations who are trying to receive that aid. it is shooting at them and is turning humanitarian aid into a terrorist mechanism directed against us. we will not agree to that in any way. now in his role has approved the temper or retrieve his extension on the proposal by donald trump invoice. steve would cough. under this initiative, the seas file will remain in place during the muslim holy month of ramadan and the jewish pass of a period that have mice is expected to release hall for the remaining hostages. on the 1st day of the plan with the rest to be freed, one is a permanent, the truth is negotiated. however, the group rejected each roles deviation from the original agreement, which called for all hostages to be really used in exchange for a full idea of withdrawal. mazda keys, east role of chief,