is the whole closes on the line causes of this conflict in that anybody who wants to help the situation can not advocate for continued for securities. a lot of attention was paid to the recent address of the french nation that french president emanuel micron made uh, recently, specifically, 2 statements in particular. first of all that he said the european union can not allowed ukraine conflicts to end in the key of regimes. capitulation, and also that russia is a threats to the european union. but lab are all about this press conference. said that the real threat is actually uh, france to russia when they're talking about actually using nuclear weapons against the threats the european union can use to to those. of course, this is a threatening directly to russian. if macklin considers us a threat, then he gathers a meeting of the chief of staff of european countries in britain. he says it is

necessary to use nuclear weapons and prepare for their use against russia. this is certainly a threat, unlike his predecessors, is to also wanted to wage war on russia, such as napoleon and hitler and is mr. my chrome does not act very elegantly, because they had explicitly stated that russia needed to be conquered and defeated . microns seems to want the same thing, but somehow claims that they must fight russia so that it does not defeat france. that's also important to understand that russia and zimbabwe have had long time warm, healthy relations between the 2 countries. i mean, the russia back during the times of the soviet union in the health zimbabwe, and it's war for independence. i'm lab, or i've also praised zimbabwe for its regional leadership in trying to tackle conflicts throughout africa, through regional organizations. specifically, what's going on right now in the democratic republic of congo? i know we've already had some great gas already this hour and another speak star t. right after the break leader of the syrup, wednesday of bosnia miller,

i know deck talks exclusively about the criminal case brought against him by sorry, of all of his thinking of different types of impression. the phone interviews a hit the one year in prison and 6 years of a ban on political activities. this is what the court of bosnia and herzegovina has ruled in relation to the president of republic, a serv hska. mueller, uh, due date for allegedly disrespecting christian schmidt's decisions on the one hand, a german citizen who presents himself as a high representative, acting unconstitutionally, an anti date. on the other hand, legitimately elected president. how will republican service go respond? who is saber rattling and bosnia and herzegovina and who was calling for dialogue.

we will seek answers from the president of republica syrup, sco mueller. uh, due date, mister president. good evening. and welcome to our tea. balkan. no virtue, good evening to you and your viewers name. obviously boston in bosnia and herzegovina is no more. that's what you said right after the sentencing. what did you mean by that to be no sure and bosnia and herzegovina is no more in its unconstitutional form. and we will show it, we are already showing it what was terminal logically called the deep state or the collective west with its rules which were often changed and then used to persecute political opponents. that's exactly what happened here. so their intentions funded by the pause the next year and their lobbyists were to make the republicans steps to disappear, turn into an empty shell. for this, it was necessary to harass the most influential people through questionable processes, thereby demonstrating that these are the prosecutor's office in the courts, which were previously established by foreigners and not by domestic authorities. after all, according to the constitution of bosnia and herzegovina,

the country has no right to have a judicial system at this level. however, they still created it being confident that they are allowed to do anything and that they can do whatever they want. schmidt's actions are legal here. we're forever grateful to russia for not allowing the security council a point, a questionable representative this way. this is a difficult issue due to the intervention of outside forces and how right russia was when it was done. so we were given the opportunity to fight, however, they themselves believe that they were allowed to do anything. this is a foreign representative, despite the fact that the constitution explicitly states that only the parliamentary assembly can pass laws on this foreigner has made a decision according to which disobedience to him. and his decisions is a crime punishable by 6 months to 5 years in prison. i found myself in a situation where he band certain laws and republicans service go. but the republicans service department adopted them in the prescribed manner, and i had to sign it. and i signed this decree, i'm into my only fault is that i signed this decrease and did not obey

a man who was not a pointed to the security council. has no authority to change laws by decision and is not a legislator. after all, the constitution itself explicitly states that this right belongs only to the parliamentary assemblies. of course, the parliamentary assembly did not even approve his decision. you cannot change the law by using a lower level legal act, which a decision is just like you can't change the constitution by law. this is a complete disregard for everything. logic as well as one might say, legal and civilizational achievements, and then bosnian, muslims accepted this as a fait accompli saying, yes, this is part of the legislation that are prosecutors. bosnian muslims must apply the one. the 3 judges who sentence me were all bosley act muslims, moderately, see it on a quarter. will you file a complaint and use all legal means and methods that you have at your disposal? squeeze. so on that as blog for the, the national assembly of republicans, serv scott has already decided on a new law on the termination and prohibition of the activities of the prosecutor's

office. and the court on the territory of republicans strips got since they are unconstitutional bodies, despite the fact that this is presented as a kind of story about caused by constitutional decisions and so on. it was all made up and is unconstitutional. and we don't need to refute it and know it's clear to all of us. so this law has been adopted, but it goes through its own procedure. it is necessary that another assembly of the people's give, gets consent. if this consent is obtained, i will be able to sign this law in 10 days and it will enter into force in such circumstances. considering what the national assembly stated regarding the prohibition of the activities of this court and the prosecutor's office, as well as taking into account the incompleteness of the process. i will respect the decisions of the national assembly, the stablish procedures and this law itself. and i will not deal with these issues . i will not consider them. i will not comment on them anymore. and i will not

consider myself a participant in this. this is my clear and unambiguous approach. so which one mainly according to the law adopted by the national assembly, the state agency for investigation and protection c. pop will not have any authority on the territory of republic, a service go. what exactly are we talking about to show that have gone to the americans created it right after the war when they wanted to present a story about war crimes. following the model of the united states, they created something similar to the f, b i or a similar structure. and then they stated that this political structure should pursue war, criminals from all sides, the politicians of that time. and the republicans stripped scott could not afford to confront those who were prosecuting war crimes, especially immediately after the war. we tried to package something to make it look serious with the intention of looking reasonable and so on for greatness. however, to overtime slides a decision of the same high representatives. this expanded to include everything

and everyone cleared. so they even started forming their own units and institutions all over bosnia and herzegovina. and there are enough of them in the republic of strips. good. however, it is important to say that according to the constitution of bosnia and herzegovina, it has no powers in the field of security and political activities and it is outside the constitution. for this reason, their actions are prohibited, but on the other hand, through what they have done and are doing the service were sentenced to more than 11 centuries of prison terms. for example, at the hague tribunal, this court install rojo there inquisitorial unconstitutional court. it has some kind of personal structure of boston. the acts were sentenced to 85 years and serves to 11 centuries. in total, we emphasize this only as an illustration of their intentions. we have not had a single functionary in the republic of serbia who has been elected since relevant garage, which is the 1st president biljana plops, which month cielo christ, ministers in the government, the government of the republic of serbia at that time. then everyone else until

today i must be on a beach and others. we are all under some kind of american sanctions. and this is being monitored by the prosecutors office, which is now preparing a trial against relevant disk of which zip codes to be on a venture and all the others. and that is, they decided to over throw the leadership of republic of service and they did it consistently so hoping that some new structure will appear. that could be a compromise for them and their plans again, it's unconstitutional $2.00 and $2.00 days. and i understood why they were doing this $40000.00 people each year received various types of funding from us a id which spent more than $402000000.00 over 4 years of which we were able to record only $156250000000.00 with us invested in the country for some verse of actions for the purpose of pursuing a policy of depriving repel, look of surfaces of power. 250000000 were used for black funds. this shows who we've been up against for the last 10 to 15 years and they didn't succeed. why did

they think they will succeed now? so, so then we still want to say that peace is what comes 1st and we want to preserve peace. you have also invited representatives of the federation of bosnia and herzegovina. we want political negotiations because we believe that they should understand that if they weren't bosnia and herzegovina then we are hearing is that they don't represent the whole of bosnia. and we are all nothing that we are here by chance and so on. that is, if you're careful and quick witted, you will realize that they are actually destroying bosnia and herzegovina. not us. we propose to return to annex for of the dayton agreement. and we are ready to stay within this framework and for this boss need a function that way. if they are not ready, they destroy it for them. and we are not ready to give legitimacy to these unconstitutional decisions regardless of how they package it into some kind of european reforms. because they need something through a hi representative or through the constitutional court. where there are 3 foreigners and to boston, the acts who make decisions as they see fit. we were also told that failure to

comply with the decisions of the constitutional court is a criminal offense. and then they canceled our republic date for january, 9th, and muslims were allowed to celebrate march 1st as their day of statehood of bosnia and herzegovina. and they want to present it as a day of statehood. for the whole of bosnia, bosnia is not only positives and muslims, but also everyone else. this indicates the deformed consciousness which can only be followed by stubbornly defending ones, right? so if you accept their logics to no one will help you, but if you were stupid enough to let them involve you in their system of thinking, we are much more united here in republic of service. go to the parliament, the government, and all the deputies, and i as the president of the republicans and the people who come to the rallies. we had one almost incredible case when we organized to rallies of support for 2 days in a row in the same place. and over these 2 days 25000 people came. so this shows that people support us and we are confident that we have the support and energy of

our people needed to protect our rights. all these actions were perceived by another entity. and in recent days, they have stated that this is an act that leads to the succession of republic, a service go from bosnia and herzegovina. what do you think about this? this is their package malicious intentions that consist in condemning someone for something, trying to defend what they have done, unconstitutionally. this is a typical story of theirs. we propose a constitution. there is no court or prosecutor's office in the constitution of bosnia and herzegovina. the court in the prosecutor's office were abolished, so we will continue, but they want the court in the prosecutor's office because it looks serious to judge politicians and in political processes. like in my case more. and if i destroy my authority in this way than who in republic of strips good will ever dare or want to resist any decision, they make nobody. and then we will destroy the republic even before the construction is completed. and then you will laugh at an entire nation that has

endured your sinister intentions for centuries. the only thing i want here is to preserve peace and stability to understand what century we are in and for all questions to be decided. politically. our political will, will be respected. our political will comes from the will of the people who elected us. and we believe that we have an absolutely legitimate structure of political institutions. and the political will to carry out any policy with our goal is not separatism to our goal is a constitutional bosnia and herzegovina. the fact that they consider it separatism is their problem. so the moment we come to this conclusion, that bosnia and herzegovina will have only 9 powers, we will not touch these powers and everything. beyond that, we will change. this is not separatism. this is a struggle for the constitution. and they don't want to constitutions to me, they want their own solutions. so, and that's the problem with it. so that when the verdict was passed, you received really significant international support,

not hungry. russian ministry of foreign affairs is not the russian presidential administration has supported your efforts to preserve the dayton agreement to not even the president of croatia reacted by saying that they want to exclude you from political life. because you don't respect the will of, as he put it, the colonial representative in bosnia and herzegovina. however, as you said, yourself, the president of serbia called you 1st and came here. what did you agree on with booted owners to what both he and we think is that we have to keep the peace but also he understands our struggle for our rights. however, we have a problem with how to explain this until now in europe and in the world, especially in western europe, in this neo liberal view of the world, they never want to listen to what we have to say, what always brought us some bad decisions always before offering us something, they accuse us of not wanting it. and so they manage to get something. now the time is come. now we understand that this will no longer be the case. this could have happened 10 years ago if we had a different global situation like we have today. of course,

that is that shameful criminal by an administration is no more so we see that president trump is persistently fighting against the deep state in america. the clearly stated that the biting administration was the worst in history and that it had done a miracle, a lot of harm. one can only imagine how much evil it has cost here and how much chaos it is. so the same administration that followed the neo liberal structure of brussels which behaving arrogantly offered money and so on. here and now i have some suggestions. they say they are ready to solve the crisis as if nothing had happened. they will offer to unfreeze some projects. they all come down to the fact that someone can be bought or offered something. but for us, they are no longer a source of funds as they used to be. yes, we were shut down. it's true. they have deprived us of the opportunity to participate in the free financial market and share and this is also true and it's been going on for a long time. so we have friends with whom we can collaborate. we work in difficult

conditions, but we achieve success. therefore, it was important to hear everything, including the opinion of mr. melana, which president of croatia. i am grateful to him and all the others for the fact that they paid attention to what was happening. and it was key who gave a serious assessment of the whole situation with a foreigner who does not have a mandate. appendix 10 of the date in the agreement states that the signatory parties to this annex select the high representative. and the security council approves him, croatia is also one of the signatories of appendix 10. according to the croatian constitution, the president of the country represents croatia. so that right, we have heard his position on this schmidt. we have the position of serbia, which also considers him anti dating. that's good. there is the position of republic of service guns that is out of 5 parties. 3 say that this is wrong, and thus if we consider there are 2 full fledged entities that have signed appendix 10, then half of the federation and 2 thirds of bosnia and herzegovina are against it.

since they have not confirmed that there is a hi representative appendix, 10 of the date in the agreement states that the signatory parties to this annex select the high representative. and the security council approves him probation is also one of the signatories of appendix 10. washington will never say that their ambassador is bad. they will simply recall him wait for the end of his mandate, but will not recognize him as that. however, what is really important to us now is that the biden administration appointed some person from the system, but the new trumpet, ministration, cancel, disappointment suspended it, and he will not come here. so these are all things that are obvious which on the other hand, there's this famous story about the piece implementation council. this is a gathering of countries that have expressed a desire to participate in this process. if this is really the piece, implementation council in croatia and serbia should be on the rest, it was there to go on and so it was excluded. now they just get together and have some conversations. they have neither an agreement on the establishment of this

body, nor the rules of its work. there is not a single decision made in accordance with civilized standards. there are only expressed opinions. it was the same and 1997 when they just greeted this high representative. and then suddenly the so called bon powers appeared. what are the bond powers to authorize who's, how can an organ that doesn't exist? neither in dayton agreement nor in the resolutions of the security council authorize anyone, but they coined the term bond powers to make it look more serious for seem like something official. they're just lying bluff and they've been bluffing for 30 years and trying to impose something on us. so everything has changed. that's what i want to say to deliver. and you mentioned the piece implementation council. there is also the office of the high representative of do they have the right and legitimacy to continue their activities in bosnia and herzegovina, or are they remnants of the past usa do probably open up usa id managed o, a charge operations. trump recently announced that usa id is a criminal organization and they would come to syria about to investigate our

actions and people researchers from america. so i said some time ago, 402000000 was officially spent here. you know, they hit, they came and gave it to a school or somewhere else, and they put it in the media until they were exhausted. but these were just a smoke screen for their evil designs. so i am convinced that based on this, the logic underlying the usa id announcement will follow a criminal case. the dayton agreement has a high representative at the choice of the parties and us, however, no one asked us in 1996, no one asked republic of service go to the very fact that we did not give our consent confirms that everything they have done is invalid because opposition means defeat, contrary to the date in the agreement, which states that you have to ask me, i might be against it. but if they were in favor, then it was a choice. so this, however, because he didn't ask anyone including us of so how are they legitimate then change and where does it say that the council elect someone to do that?

it's not written anywhere. is it written in appendix 10? no, it is not. does the constitution of bosnia and herzegovina contain information about the existence of the council? it doesn't. but is there a security council resolution that requires this? there isn't. what do you want from us? do you think we're stupid? that we don't understand that you are superior human and we are people of an inferior race that you can do this to us. well, you won't do that. we patiently enjoyed everything all these years of their stupidity. but we believed that one day from that very moment on when public opinion and the establishment in washington changed and gave people in nations the opportunity to fight for freedom. and i listened as trumps spoke. the time has come for nations to fight for their freedom. here we are fighting for our freedom this, but then doubted. lee, there has been a redistribution so to speak, of some positions in the world came to power. the circumstances are differential and what we're one step closer to achieving peace and ukraine. do you think such

a redistribution will bring anything positive to republic of service goes nikoto, an explanation that no one will give us anything. they just taught us how to take and kidnap. but if we're fighting for something, we'll get it. and that's why it was important to me as president to use this time is there is always time to do something and time to not do something. i am convinced that now is the right time is a trump one, the unstable european union that has harmed us here is not consolidated at all. elections in germany. the situation in austria is very critical. may chrome has a problem with the support of his own people in the united kingdom has left the european union. these are all elements that indicate that things are no longer the same as before. when people just said what they wanted to say in one voice, that voice is gone. so let's see what it looks like. someone's b arrives and lectures, trump in the oval office. so instead of representing this sovereignty of the united states to humiliates, it tries to humiliated and trump is reacting in defense of america. all european

leaders have cited with zalinski against trump. this has never happened, as it has never happened before. for europe to propose one security council resolution, and for america to propose another, what happened here? it turned out that we were right when we did not accept this anti russian hysteria . and when we said that we would not impose sanctions, we the service from republic of service, god did not allow bosnia and herzegovina to impose sanctions against russia. serbia did the same. some muslim and passengers have supported some statements as some world forms. but this is not significant in the legal sense of bosnia and herzegovina has not impose sanctions against russia because we did not allow it. and we had extra pressure. they were watching us from brussels, eager to destroy us. but we also revived today. it's been shown that trump wants to make peace with president tutoring. says yes, you have a decadent european structure that wanted war because it could no longer manage its own crises in its own countries and only in the u,

but something else was needed. and then they chose war and the course they say that putting was right from the very beginning. and i will say one thing, no matter what that i was able to get to know him through our conversations, and that he is a man of comp character, a man who evaluate a man who regrets. because there are mistakes on both sides. that is, maybe i got the impression that maybe there wasn't any pity for the numerous western mercenaries arriving in ukraine. but he constantly felt sorry for the ordinary ukrainian people. and i could see it in every statement he made. and in every conversation we had. and that's why he waged such a war so that there would not be many civilian casualties. and that it would be an army gathering. i'm not a gathering of civilians, and that's what struck him through it. but it turned out that russia was right, and i'm just scared here. i think what the russians have in mind now is consistent with my perception of what his affair decision was. and so that every thing that is russian, let alone the space on the other side. which means the population of odessa,

for example, there will always be dissatisfaction somewhere, because odessa, if that's the case, did not belong to russia. so because as far as i know, it is a russian city and that in this regard, there are many russians living there. and that they have the right to be in their homeland just as americans have the right to protect every american wherever they are in the world. russia has a legitimate rights to protect its people, especially those who live near russia. and let's not talk about the history of ukraine. we all know russia acted very, fairly protecting its interest, especially since president putin, himself spoke in 2007 at the munich conference. and i had the opportunity to listen to it. he spoke very clearly and openly, and his speech had the same power as that of us, vice president vance, at the security conference. and the president said clearly to, we are not for war. we want peace. ukraine is our brother, but we do not want to see ukraine in nato, and the e. u is the 1st step towards the joining nato. right. are there any set at all

clearly? and what happened sometime later in 2014, they signed. russia could have ended all this more easily back then. it was a much easier solution, but above all, russia wanted peace and it did it to its own detriment. with thought that the signed agreement with holland and with miracle meant peace and an end to war. however, they themselves stated that this was a hoax, and that they just wanted to buy time to embarrass rush after this for an order i want to ask you, do you see any similarities between these minsk agreements and the dayton peace agreement as well? yes, it's the same story and i can cite as many agreements as you want to. they signed an agreement to stop a certain crisis situation. and on the same day, the next day, it was actually destroyed. it was destroyed from the very beginning. so this, this is the case with the date and agreement. the minsk agreement for the resolution, $1244.00, which states that cost of oh is graphically a part of serbia. the serbia would return to its administration after a certain number of years and arm its army. neither russia nor serbia bought it for

many years, america has played a key role in the west due to internal problems. russia was not as strong as it is today to be able to step forward and protect some interest. so they were all lying . so and, and they'll lie again to ukraine is not a country that deserves to survive in a geo political sense. it turned out to be a serious, destructive factor, more over it is anti russian. yeah, it is on natural for ukraine to be anti russian. and after all, we know from history that crimea, for example, which you are now being told about. and some other places were appointed by different stars, kings, whoever they were in russia, even khrushchev himself, who was the ukrainians, separated a huge part of ukraine in yugoslavia. they were training to attack russia and thought that they would practice enough to forget that russia is a powerful country and that it is invincible. when i spoke with president putin once about this, he said, yes, america has the most powerful army in the world. they allocated 600000000000,

and russia has only 30 to 40000000000 for the army. but he says, there is one thing that you forget, especially europe and america itself. russia has the strongest defense of forces in the world today. and that's when i realized it. but in all of this, that is being done, shows that russia has the largest and strongest defense force and defensive army in the world. and that neither nato, nor anyone else can do anything about this. europe has no raw materials, no liter. so it's one minute. it was flirting with america for the next. it became even weaker. their values collapsed. the german economy is collapsing and of course it won't fail, but failure is already happening. france has been in a difficult situation for a long time. italy is in trouble. what do they have? they have imposed on themselves the definition of what value should be, what europe represents. meanwhile, history is full of negative facts about them, especially in their part dissipation. in the 2nd world war review, the history in this regard with russia was absolutely right,

but it was the only possible solution i understood putting, and i supported him from the very beginning. so he's right. and no matter what they call it in the west, i don't care. trump shows that putting is a man of peace and that he wants peace. but he has not addressed anyone in western europe, but is addressing putting in now what, where are the people who told me i was influenced by russia? where are they now? is there a term for the negative russian influence that you mentioned? where is the huge amount of money that was spent on russia's negative influence? everything has changed, and i believe that peace will soon come, which will elevate russia even more. so who was right me, who tried to maintain good relations with the russians or them who spent billions and sold their people an empty story about russian influence for i once found myself in brussels and at 10 o'clock there was no light on the streets. and i asked them why this is, they say putting one about putting it with such a logical behavior. it's such a nonsense that it's impossible to understand what it's all about. but it's all

a life. it can't be politics. if president putin is not lying, he made it clear that this was russian, that these territories crimea, don bass and the rest people voted to be russia. and this is russia. you're fighting on someone else's territory, no matter what you think. who knows? you know how you look at trump now, who says that canada is the 51st american states would have put in a headset then that ukraine should be part of the russian federation. he would be the greatest war criminal there must stop. russia is a great power. trump's actions prove and show that russia is a great power and he has not met with germany. the netherlands. i do not want to offend anyone, but he has not met them since clinton was right. and i was right in all this, adhering to this policy, which it was right to stick to this policy. we had to get through this time somehow . and now we are waiting for you to tell us, or at least apologize, that you come from the west and apologizes. but you won't. president thank you for this conversation. the.

the romania detained 6 suspects and i must go link trees in case on the same day a brushing, no tree at sashay, and his deputy are expelled from bucharest, all to a head on the program at this hour. donald trump's foreign policy chief confirmed side load up by the ukraine conflict. what the west does repeatedly labeled russian propaganda. president trump, to use this as a protracted stalemated conflict. and frankly, it's a proxy war between nuclear power as united states offering ukraine and russia. and it needs to come to an end. we will consider the presence of these troops on ukrainian territory in exactly the same way we considered the potential presence of nato and your brain plus no matter the flags on there. you know.