the the remainder of the remaining all over the coming weeks in coming months before the election to prevent him from running again because they say roy now the supposed to do with him was running today the reporting the shot it taking us to the end of this news block,

know it before i go, i want to t up what's coming up. must go say the europeans, loving their zalinski, poke the language of peace while supporting more war. so miss the contradiction. tiny piece talks on ukraine actually get off the ground at all costs talk discusses, it's a big issue and that's the the, [000:00:00;00]

the hello and welcome to cross talk. we're all things are considered. i'm peter level. there's a growing consensus that a deal is necessary to end the conflict and ukraine. this is progress. the problem is there is no consensus on what kind of deal that might be. trump demand to crate and negotiate with russia, the europeans and zelinski talk. the language of peace while supporting more war, the processing war and peace. i'm joined by my guest doctor mirrors, i in london. he's a senior journalist at radio himalayan news in germany. we have to be a scholar and he is an entrepreneur and political analyst. and in los angeles we have to pay e and he is an independent geo political and macro economic analyst, or a gentleman cross socrates and effect. that means you can jump anytime you want. and i always appreciated by you got up so early in the morning for us. we all appreciate it very,

very much. welcome to the program. i hope you've had at least one cup of coffee. all right, let's start out what the deal is. the title of this program is deal. what deal? so a lot of progress has been made since that meltdown. and the oval office trump is demanding a deal. he has almost always gonna say i'm of all the high cards. he has all of the cards and he has the table as well. so a deal is in train here. what deal could that be? because we have zalinski on x thing. ukraine is ready to come to the negotiating table as soon as possible to bring lasting peace closer. what does that mean to you? one week after this disastrous oval office meeting, go ahead by yeah, i think the deal is ultimately if you read between the lines, it's an optical deal for the western world to save face. uh huh. after 3 years after 3 years of a brutal more,

that doesn't seem to be leading in the wes favor regardless of how many arguments resources or whatnot are being sent over. so it is a deal essentially to say, face, that's really why anybody in, in the public space is there. let's figure out, 1st of all, who's in charge? this is my broken record launcher every time i'm either on the show or anywhere else. i mean, who's truly in charge because the lensky trump vance. rubio, storm or macro. all of these banking establishment. assign public figures are tactical distractions away from the actual atlanta's. this power structure which involves very private trillion or oligarchs, literally hell bent on seizing ukrainian. and ideally, ultimately, russian natural resources and state assets, ukraine's rare earth metals. you'll notice it's a deal, but it's a deal for piece, the price or the, or the minerals, the rare minerals that of ukraine. why?

you cranes where metals are valued at $11.00 trillion with a t, as in thomas trillion us dollars and truck unfortunately wants half of ukraine metal, the cranes metals for whom up though for whom ultimately who is trustee admirable agent who re assigned him to the white house for a reduction kissinger's, neo quarter uncle. mad man, siri of geo political influence who is constantly reorganizing bondholders for ukraine's debt right after that to 20. 14 cool. because the answers are pretty warm, are getting closer. they're consider also, they, ukraine's mineral deposits are globally significant because they offer diversification from surprise telling dominant producers of a rare metals like china. consider also the trans core mandate and being in power again involves separating russia from china as much as possible. and then you will get away from the distractions that, again, are tactical, and are trans atlantic and, or in nature i, you know,

so much of what you say i agree with. i mean a, certainly this is all a distraction. if i go to the doctor and doctor mirrors in london, we've all been following on uh, the pronouncements coming out of european capitals nato land about, you know, you know, the, the ukraine, you know, as long as it takes, we've heard this mantra from biden. and now the europeans are saying, and i agree with what pi had to say. this is all a deflection. it is last. they are going to make a lot of noise. they're going to say, we're going to do everything for ukraine. we're gonna, we're going to use the profits from stolen russian assets to funded, which is dubious in itself because they know they have lost and they want to turn around and say, we did everything we could. but trump decided, i think that's a diversion right now. what do you, what do you think, dr. maritza? i totally agree with you because this is

a diversion and the question is why they need a diversion? what, what is opposing them to talk about deals and diversion? when on thursday, the european summer emergency somebody is being held. and in that summer everyone is trying to force each other pledge, billions of dollars in a digital fund. further from this, the conflict and you could in, i think that the a says the american support has been away. this new trump administration has totally changed about it. i'm off the international donations in that regard. so you won't be in defense, but there is not enough to finance such a big project i called as you greenwater project, some project basically that was planned for years and years. so they are now as well. i'm playing with each other for money. i'm talking about bomb, the rising taxes and all that this kind of adventure to them is going to hit them

back in their own countries because it is unemployment. there's poverty child poverty in the u. k is on the rise like never before. and they are trying to fund a losing war. this is going to be a big question mark when it comes to british public opinion. next is the you, chris. mean, you just ship it about this illusion. it's totally disillusion. they have no direction that they know they're fighting a losing lot and, and, and, and done the disciplined thing among the premiums isn't freezing. so i think this deal is just an excuse to buy a dime in the vehicle off the new american stats about this more than this administration is blank to distance itself from you, but in water because they have to address to their own deficits and economic as it is so they, they,

they have decided to go out. and now europe is in panic mode. and on thursday process, mcgraw has made a very dangerous statement. the said that we would also consider the possibility of using the nuclear data. and the russian foreign minister has gone through that saying that this is a serious threat. bradshaw. so i think europe is busy, they're going mentor. yeah. but it doesn't say they're going to be bolts on good. oh yeah. we don't want to have a plans in the sky. one little place shut down, but a russia is the target for total. oh yeah. well, the but that, that's if and only if all members of the alliance agree to article 5, donald trump is not going to do that. it will backfire on them. toby, as you know, one of the things that we keep hearing from western leaders and that not on the american side of the atlantic, but it keeps talking about a ceasefire or

a truce. and what's really strange about using those 2 words is that i'd cease fire a truce involves at least 2 parties. the party that is not being consulted is russia and russia has said repeatedly, it is not i is not interested in a truce or a ceasefire. go ahead in germany. yeah, i thank you very much for my kind of perspective. so i went to a rough ends and told me the aging i'm. i think i'm kind of what did you pay to the person the other for my grandfather and i'm every time he was saying, if you don't know where i'm coming from, you don't know where to go. so i was visiting restaurant and outside of joins in 2019 and the from yeah, and i was a visit and they like to talk to you in the days and forth from a, in, in, in washington, dc. and folks work. it's everything as an economy to reason for my kind of perspective,

visa ultimately resides which costs from the 2nd world war. and after that i will cut them fall in the 1990 and i'm going to start on that fans getting shuffled when i was on a truck, which i pressed the personally see one of the most major good conditions of the. busy second world war will make these colorful and they, they signed the decrease that there is no human to the, to the east. and this normally from my kind of perspective i have seen and i also have good relationships to the gtc states. and i'm also see i was in uh in jordan, i'm on when it happened to gather the war. and i'm seeing the problem that say we totally lost the transfer and see why they wasn't made so with germany joint and also about your being members and 1965. and to be honest, after the iron custom for 1991. and we should have less needs are, and we will just so that was, that was some different kind of organization to protect more in euro been of what

i'm looking at from the german perspective. if at this moment, you know, we have the object, the 24 hour basic law where we are allowed to, to join the organization to protect load the piece in your. but then when, when, when you're seeing what was happening on the timeline in the years, and so now, and jonathan, germany was a, you know, i, i said sometimes if we had called you guys by the americans and toby, as the facts of the matter is germany is not a sovereign state, it does not control its sovereignty. it does not control its foreign policy. it does not control its security. and on top of it, most likely 99 percent. sure. the americans blew up your pipeline. and what did germany say about it? what did germany do? they do? they expected? what is stupid because america is the biggest member and the nature of domains. the 2nd biggest um they bump, bump,

bump. not seen wanting to disclose these economy prices. the problem is that i was already telling this in 2019, you need something in your black and, you know, own risk because of the 1812 random julio, and tried to call the restaurant. and the type of waterloo then, went out of supplier ends up in 94 and then from 1990 on to the right. now we have to be at the same because the major was only done for one purpose. the americans are needing this and they're offering an open door policy. but what, what, what was the target to the stop? and, you know, the, the open door policy was open to everyone except for russia. and that is the problem here. gentlemen, i'm going to jump in, we're going to go to a short break, and after that short break, we'll continue our discussion on war and peace. stay without

the what else shows. just don't the house and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves worlds of parts, we choose to look for common ground. the holly we're looking at, i was going to dream live for dreams. come true. we have approximately 10000000 people in california that are risk of becoming on house

. looks good. and then some people are working to pretty jobs and still not enough because of the cost of leaving also has increased the coal bags and then they'll bite shift last year long. the amount of, of homeless rose by 12 percent in california. the lots of nice across stock were all things are considered. non peter roosevelt's remind you were discussing war and peace. the, you know, pi i, big been covering the issue of ukraine ever since the legal over throw of the elected government in, uh,

february of 2014. so this is my 11th year and covering this crisis. and what i find really interesting and i've gone through it over and over again, i think i already mentioned you have done over a 100 programs on this topic alone. and how the narratives are always changing. okay. rushes last rushes. uh, ukraine is winning and the rest is going to collapse in the matter of weeks, you know, all, you know, but the rubel to rubble all of this nonsense here. but what's really interesting is what you're coming, what's coming out of european capitals. the panic is, is that it's not all it's, but it has nothing to do with ukraine. it is never had anything to do with ukraine as a political entity. i'm keeping in mind what you said at the beginning of the program . but western politicians, the europeans, they're desperate to keep the political west relevance because it is rapidly becoming irrelevant. go ahead by as a part of that relevancy involves the actrix and for, you know, we just got trunk back in for

a 2nd term and immediately it's the sense of uh, okay, i'm very pro or is administration a seemingly optically very pro russian. that is a tactical, good cop, bad cop being deployed once again. so in this past couple of weeks deployed a collectively, europe, as, as bad. cough look, we're going to re are look, we're going to find uh, $800.00 to $900000000000.00 us from somewhere in order to rearm. but trump and his administration, or ridiculing zelinski on the floor of the white house and demanding apologies out of him. this is all, yeah, i don't know if anybody who's over and in a position of influence across the entire your age and land mass is literally a genuinely fold by this. a pantomime is too bulky theatre in order

to confuse you're a german guess referenced, then you use so you did as well. peter, the sabotaging of the north stream $1.00 and $2.00. i would argue the prior sabotage was the removal of gerhard schroeder and escorting him on ceremoniously out of power for a much more complying miracle. why? because uh schroeder had the air to the ground for german industry and leaning closer to a naturally logically, rationally towards the region, assets and, and forming alliances. well, we had to prior world wars to prevent a german, russo german, a alliance that's worked. that's fairly obvious. mertz coming in it's, it's a business to the new mandate, just to reiterate what i said earlier is how best to separate russia and china. so stay liberally and how to do so as soon as possible, and you crated to address your earlier question or point,

as is supposedly been as neo afghanistan opportunity to try and pierce russian resolve, let alone it's economy, let alone it's military capacity to try and bleed russia drive as much as possible that obviously is not working. and hence the need to shuffle the deck here to have a newer approach that involves some of this. so this, the actrix, you know, dr. mirrors in london. very, it lets you know the big need this phase of the conflict 3 years ago it started in 2014, but when waste, let's use the starting point for our purposes, the special military operation. so you really have the collective west using ukraine is a proxy too weak in russia, as pi is already pointed out, that hasn't worked as a matter of fact. i live here, it's strength in russia immensely,

and made it actually richer. but now you have because european leaders, again, after the meltdown in the oval office. so explain to me, sir, how europe thinks it can take on russia, the united states and china all at the same time. i mean, what cool aid are these people drinking? go ahead. well, i think that there they are desperate they have that one because there are 2 aspects to this that i can see. number one is the domestic a failure to increase the g d b over the years and surviving on the bank of recession. the bank of slumps economics lumps in to people are doing outside of the backs are every saturday. every sunday people are going to the judges to get food from the food banks and they're not talking about the government is talking about,

you know, funding a lot that everybody knows is a proxy or you talk to someone on the street in, in london. and then discuss with them they all love. this is they know it's a proxy more. and the reason that europe now is panicking, they want to dig on china and russia, and maybe in the near future, they're going to dig a home as good as well. because the last, the last, the broad, this is not the time for more. this is the time to sit on dog. this is a time to negotiate. what have you learned from the 2nd world war? all of your was totally destroyed. now they want to do that again. they want to repeat the catastrophic disaster of learn award to. so they, these, you would have been leaders of selfish. they are equal to the same thing. and they

have no name in their heart for the people who they present on. well, obviously, obviously in, over the last 3 years. so let's go to toby as in germany, i'm nobody, as far as i'm aware in europe voted for this proxy war. no one is ever ask the people and we have, we have political parties, election after election across the continent, populace parties on the left and right running against that. and then you have the radical center that will not deal with sometimes up to 3040 percent of the electorate, but it is against the consensus of b leads. i mean, it is becoming less and less democratic. ukraine certainly is not a democracy. go ahead, toby. yes, yeah, i see it in general and not so that's what i think the biggest, biggest information. all right, in business, also a road and it's a huge opportunity. the thing was only to weaken in, in general, um, germany and in europe. because we have these ties uh,

with russia. the problem is that all the information which i presented in the media are based on this test. so, and the whole thing is, we have like brain watch, you know, when you're looking also the movies back in the days you have what this every time the russians of the bed and the americans and the rest of the alliance of the goods . and also regarding right now that your views be sitting at the negotiating table for me, the most important thing is right now. so what i need is e, and it's trump is fine to do so to get a receipt. then it's nice because if america says okay, you pray with your company, tomato, you can keep the areas with you. all right, the already have to over with ross and we never get back because i have some business on that's getting the dumbass. they already have invested huge amounts of billions, and these are cracked and the people are fine with this. then we stopped the war and then later on he asked to review what happens on the timeline. and we, we have to negotiate by effects. because for me,

my perspective i'm and the last 1015 years more abroad, i was proud to be a drum and i am proud to be a your team, but i to myself, more as a global citizen. and what's his use going on? you know, with the 2nd word for most the job at 50000000 people from german and russia side died by a sold, we like and we loved each other. so all the administration from the rest of the sites is less aggressive and i don't right know, see their reason and why russia will go further to invade, i have to buy into to you to europe. so the 1st step is to making these install these truly of the young people to be, to toss it toby, as hopefully, hopefully one is hopefully one of the outcomes of all of this will be the end of nate toward lisa much more week. and one pie i've asked my guess over the last few weeks ever since the famous side, trump putting phone call and we see witnessing a y'all to a 2 point oh,

an ice. and i, when i say you all to, i think of a, in a positive way. i know there are historians, i'd say it was a, a bit trail. i think it was the 3 victor sitting down. that's what happens when you, when go ahead by. i don't think so. uh, because uh, the, the core mandates still involve isolating russia and weakening its influence as possible to jet that. just go back to the 1st term that used at the outset of the show. and what's it core here is that the term deal whose deal? why our, the russian supposedly involved like, where are the russians with regard to this mineral steel that i was referencing early in. like a. okay. so, so lensky, they, yeah, he apologizes to trump the kids and make up, okay, let's have that minerals deal go through. let's finalize on that. and that, that you, where are you involving directions? where are you involving any of the east? it's, it's like this is just like,

literally someone's screen writing and scratching the, the draft and throwing it away on a, on an hour by hour basis. i reiterate. we need to figure out who genuinely in charge. we need to figure out who specifically, what their roles or what their influence is, are with regard to industry, their community schedules, whatever we need to do, that's core mandate ahead of everything else that's for me. well, i mean, probably if i could and can stay with you here. but given what russia has demanded and it's all publicly known, people say, what do the russians want? what is boots? and once it's go to the kremlin, what inside you can find it is really easy here. i would tend desirable to i think i would submit to, to you my guess in my audience here, is it russia is going to get as pretty much exactly what it's demanded from the very, very beginning. why? because trump has no, it doesn't have high cards. when it comes to russia,

but when it comes to everyone else, no one else has cards except for the russians and the americans 30 seconds before we finish off. yeah, just uh, the optics will continue to re emphasize. i said the latter we're putting is the new at off hitler. now russia is been to nazi germany. they are hell bent onto taking over europe and then the rest of the world. and that is classic psychological projection from those who are actually genuinely running things from behind the curtains as trans atlantic with. yeah, especially if i, i tend to agree. i mean be a, they've had a number of narratives that have fallen flat on their face. and that there's nothing that's going to stop them because they are the ones that started this and they will never take responsibility for it. it's all the time we have gentlemen. and when i think my guess in london, germany and in los angeles. and of course, i want to thank our viewers for watching us here at r t c. and next time, remember, prospect rules.

the the, the 1st 3rd of the 19th century was marked by the aggressive expansion of the united states. the americans sought to seize as much territory for settlement as possible, ignoring the sovereignty of the neighboring states and the interests of the indigenous peoples in 18. 45, washington announce the annex ation of mexican texas. and in march, 1846 american troops invaded mexico. however, mexico itself did not have enough means to effectively confront the enemy. besides,

it was being torn apart by internal conflicts. the americans manage to turn the tide of the war in their favor. in september 18, 47, the us army captured mexico city. mexico was course designed a humiliating peace treaty according to way to get lost 55 percent of its territory . dx. 18 of the lands to the united states led to terrible consequences, bloodshed, genocide was committed against the indians in california. during the 1st half and 3 of the american ruled, the number of the indigenous people in the region decrease from 150216000 people. slavery which had been abolished in mexico long before the united states attacked was restored on the occupied territories. this will later become one of the reasons for the civil war in the united states themselves. nations like individuals are punished for their transgressions. we got our punishment. american president

ulysses grant rode about the consequences of aggression against mexico several decades later. the breaking news for the age of mass executions of a minority group in northern syria, spreads on line that's in meet the new estimates. governments. ongoing classes with a sub lawyer list talk yeah. talk to plus the community probably them us to support romanian. presidential candidates. kelly and george s. cruz. now as he submits the official documents to enter a new elections. first run results were a no been november when the euro, skeptic,