uh, well, to be honest, i did not expect any specific uh things from these negotiations. to be honest, specifics. we, too, are not yet, not yet, yes, but still such movements. yes, and the words that were spoken. in general, they assume that some kind of rapprochement of the position did happen. well, to be honest, these are the words that kuleba and zelensky said about the upcoming negotiations, but they set the tone for such a pessimistic, frankly speaking. well, here it is necessary, of course, i don't have it yet. uhm something specific thoughts about what can, for example, uh, this is a decrease in military activity in the chernigov and kiev directions, but serve the cause, uh, yes, there is a rapprochement of the position, but the version is understandable. this direction was still a help. for our entire operation. yes, all the

more, this is understandable in light of the statement that shoigu said this morning that the main uh, object and main goal is, uh, the donbass situation and the removal of the threat to donbass yes, and the main goal of ensuring the security of donbass is therefore, but with we remember that the ministry of defense said that all these visits to the territory of ukraine were necessary to solve this problem in a different way. she didn't dare. therefore, if we move there, well, to a decrease in activity, but if we would like, to be honest, in response, yes, there, these are negotiations in response to hear what, uh? yes, there the kiev regime is moving to the same, but more, uh, calm course. here is direct contact with the donbass, to stop shelling, uh, the cities of donetsk there, gorlovka lugansk and so on. well lugansk is already smaller after all. but donetsk gorlovka continues to be shelled, therefore, i would like to hear what the other side

says about this and about reducing its military activity. here it would like to fall asleep, but the other side with. eh, as it were, you understand, for now she is talking about how she will hold a referendum, so that’s all for now. well , yes, positions have been outlined, but you know, you know, you can do something else for that. uh, dmitry, i'm following the negotiations closely, of course, and yesterday and tracked the statement, including the russian leaders. uh, ukrainians involved in this. and i want to say that, for example, the minister of foreign affairs. uh, ukraine mr kuleba. yesterday, his last statement was: and what are we going to deal with the referendum ourselves? that is, he made it clear whether there will be a referendum or not, this is an internal question. and i am ukraine. for example, i want to say that, according to the constitution of ukraine, we do not need to hold a referendum to change the constitution, this is the point that was unconditional this morning yesterday evening. and i became i watched

press conference of the ukrainian side, mr. archami, mr. chaly, i want to say that about chalov. for example, in the delegation of the ukrainian side. he appeared not so long ago - a lawyer, an international specialist, who is an experienced person, and i have such, you know, and, well, maybe a little optimism. due to the fact that he is there, because a person who understands a person who is a material person who can write documents by hand and, finally, political agreements. i won't rather talk about who spoke out. the only thing that, uh, the ukrainian side says, what the first question is about is the guarantees of ukraine's security after the end, but of the military conflict. what is it about , dmitry, what, for example, the negotiator , the minister of defense of ukraine a, recently met with the president of the united states of america bud. and i 'm sure he personally got some answers to his questions, right? and now what is called

brings them to life, because security guarantees for ukraine must first of all be and from the russian federation and from the people's republic of china that is, everything went on. e member countries, e security council and after israel and this should again start to speak in chorus. when i asked you to stop, at least once i did not give you the opportunity to continue, no one hears or understands anything. you see, you must must must, it's all great. well, they should only if ukraine fulfills its obligations unconditionally. so i would like that i would like you, as regards the obligation, to clearly say that we are already articulating we have been in ukraine for a long time. we have been regulating for a long time that we refuse to join nato, we are talking about the fact that we are now receiving information that we have received written proposals from ukraine that it agrees to accept

non-nuclear and neutral ones, and this is here is the fact of dmitry's neutral status. it is very important for us, because we can declare ourselves a neutral state, but our neighbors, and especially what is called the un security council states, must also recognize our neutral status. this is the most important question that exists today and will end with the fact that on the eve of the meeting we just started. immediately , the higher gifts said that he had previously said that yes, we heard, but the russian side in regard to the abuse of prisoners of war. we will take action, we we have identified the perpetrators and will punish them. this is what concerns i would like to see the words from afar, it would be done. and by the way, you know, the sexual position of power, because he was told, now, if an interesting moment that you, like reznikov , coordinated with the biden, by the way, biden, when he coordinated the cheat sheet, was no, but i’m just vasily, this is a very important moment, because you

understand, here now there are two moments, one about biden, and one about yours new hosts to whom you pray, this is very important in order for things to happen. here biden was seen talking to journalists, who when he said no, no-no-no about b. no, we discussed it. here is his cheat sheet. here, i just want to show so that when you make bets and say and say that you agreed on everything, see this, he holds this in his hand at this very press conference, where he said that i didn’t mean it, but i don’t refuse words, i had in mind, i do not refuse a word. and that's where the questions of journalists are written. unless you were advocating regime change, what you had in mind could not be clarified. i expressed moral excitement. these are the politicians who formulated the apologies, and there is not a single one. well , the second question is about the macron. this is what journalists have to ask. they are also black. well , what journalists have to ask, they are black, what should biden answer. i have

one question vasily in this place. when biden met with reznikov, did he have a cheat sheet or not. that's not enough, i'm sure that if you were my leader, for example, you are the president. i am your assistant. i would definitely prepare such scribbles for you with an answer, because in order to help you. i'll upset you, maybe you didn't prepare. look, that's right, you, yes, you, maybe maybe you would cook, but i wouldn’t use them, you know? yes? here's what you'll do with your new british masters. i dug deep there. uh, live for the reuters. said the favorite of the entire public in our country or rhinestones. i don't know if you saw it or not. look, here's what she publicly said. we must be sure that any future negotiations will not end up selling ukraine to ukraine or repeating the mistakes of the past. we remember the difficult regulation of the fourth year, which could not provide ukraine against. security will just come back for a new one. that's

why we can't let him benefit from this horrendous aggression. well, first of all, she dipped here, of course, her neighbors to the french first of all, but the germans, who, according to the british, could not, uh, resolve the situation. vasily , i want us to mark this here, because your addiction , which you continue to rely on will go sideways to you. legacy administration , i know. but the statement madam or rhinestones. she only talks about uh there's an asset underneath called ukraine and here are the hosts. uh, they are very worried about its future, that is, they are very worried that the asset will not be in the condition that they considered earlier now it can be slightly spoiled, but actually, and they are worried that here they are not in full will be able to use it as they wished, that is. well, they should have burned him in the cauldron of war. and here, and now he can just get a little damp, therefore, this is what passion really cares about, huh? as regards the situation

donbass, or rather, not in the donbass in terms of military actions and statements. eh, the minister of defense of the russian federation, the minister of defense of the russian federation, mr. shoigu, and we are talking about the concentration of the armed forces in the donbas direction, precisely. and we talked with you many times together with dmitry here in this donbass studio. the boiler must be destroyed. that is, the largest forces of ukraine are gathered there, according to various estimates, there are from forty to 70,000 there, and manpower is located, that is, probably, the total place with mariupol and there is a huge amount the remaining armed equipment that is there and there, uh, let's say the territory, which, well, it is quite difficult to work with it. yes, that is, there is the same avdeevka industrial complex, there is a huge number of enterprises that have been captured by nations that have dug in there for a long time and have long established their positions, trying to introduce fire. here on the territory of donbass therefore, if we compare now. and the lugansk people's republic, the republic of donetsk lugansk , has already been liberated by 90 percent. if not longer,

we still have the key ones, and the cities are severodonetsk lisichansk and partly popasnaya partly rubezhnoye and these territories are the tail of this one. and well , this boiler, which is coming. right there in the direction of artyomovsk towards kramatorsk, and here, there is a large large military facility. that is, as soon as this grouping is destroyed, there will be a turning point in the military phase. that is, there will definitely be a break. now there is already, provided there are no excellent air defenses for it. there is no air force, but the navy. no, that is, these actions led to the fact that now the russian army should already focus on specific steps. the next step, which was designated by the russian. the army is the donbass, here is the donbass territory. here, the donbass cauldron must be destroyed, as for negotiations, there is another way out of this situation, of course, you will serve as a weapon. there is a second way out - lay down your arms, and we have always talked about it. that is, you can let your national battalions go through the green corridors, which means that one alone will go

to the side. it means that we are under trial, as if they would pass through the filtering, if they did crime means they will go to jail, if they did not commit, they go to their families. that is, this is a normal excellent output. otherwise , they must be destroyed and eliminated. that is, because later life with them will not notice that this exit was marked from the very first day of the special operation and even two days before . yes, if we are talking about negotiations, then the key position in the negotiations was discussing the neutral status in the future, and the neutral status will be discussed - this does not contradict, but those initial the messages that were, but this does not mean at all that this neutral status will ensure that the current regime, the existence of the current regime in ukraine is impossible, that is, ukraine will remain toxic if these figures who now represent the ukrainian authorities in it remain options. we don't really consider it, because we think that again, you have already mentioned the 700 million that the americans are planning to give out. yes, no matter what, no matter what piece of ukraine remains under control? americans, then

there is ukraine not a subject, yes, that is, all the figures that vasyl spoke about, they are not subjects, that is, he is going to report to the massacres. he is going to report not to zelensky. this is all clear. rodion but there is one point. you see, as if 700 million are planned, and 700 million are neutral, well, something neutral. yes, what is it in ukraine, what is it, and this is such a kind of neutrality, so, yes, then it means, you understand, this will not be signed for an agreement right there. i don't know because. well, to be honest, i care most of all the problem of the subject. i don’t quite understand who to say so, eh is called the person in charge, but uh, well, by the way, ukraine’s proposal includes a ban on its presence on its territory of foreign military bases and troops can begin to draw conclusions. ukraine seems to have also signed this. well, again, without she signs it. listen to them, firstly, it was fixed in the ukrainian constitution. and secondly, it was signed in the minsk agreements. well, what's the point. wait it was here there is one question.

you see, i am primarily interested in the question of the subject. secondly, i am interested in the other issue of the implementation of these agreements, because, uh, if they are only signed, even because you understand how, well, you can’t supply military assistance and provide in a country that has signed its neutral status is impossible, as soon as this is done the contract will be broken and violated by the party that singled out and which accepted everything very simply. well, since we are negotiating, then we, in general, will divorce seriously. we're not stupid. we roll we don't play the fool, therefore, our official representatives whom we have just heard. well , they told us what they are doing so that ukraine has the opportunity to agree on something with us, that is, since we are negotiating. so we admit the possibility that ukraine can negotiate with us. under what conditions well, under the conditions of fulfilling those essential requirements that are presented, because these requirements

today are backed up by a special military operation, it is the main argument and confirmation that these claims are trade. they're not some kind of bargaining chip that you can, uh, change into denomination, and turn the metal and gold, silver, and silver into copper, there, and so forth. this is definitely not going to happen. well , the second one must be understood that after all, no one has canceled it. er, well, the basic framework in which all this happens, namely our requirements for guarantees of our security. our security is not ukrainian, but ours, which we presented at the end of last year, on which there was no intelligible answer. here we heard some giggling in response. here we saw all sorts of tricks. zoo-worthy, so to speak, so the answer to those supper giggles was, again, a special, military operation. it was said there that there would be military technical ones. well, please, they apply these measures. you can see.

what are they, respectively, we resume our question. he is not like ukraine, he supplies weapons to those who are currently using it as tools to finance it. so, can you refuse it? that's what is our position, because please note there is another position. grabbed the figure go, you started everything goodbye. we do not allow you to refuse. we will destroy you. this is another possible behavior. it is possible, it is allowed by the russian federation, but so far we are not using it . here, in fact, in the center of dim, but i, like you, also have the main question about the subjectivity of the coastal negotiators from that side. uh, actually, who do they represent? the fact is that the current, kiev authorities, as far as i understand, they no longer lead inside ukraine, about nothing, because the control system has long been broken and destroyed, and as i understand it, field commanders are already operating in a

semi-autonomous regime of great secrecy. there is no. this is the first. the second one is not subjective from the point of view of the external contour, because, well, we understand, and you are right, we ran to consult, no, not safe and not even a chair, but in the third assistant to the junior janitor. as usual, any any representative of the colonial. such no colonial administration, so yes for me i understand that the authorities have a big head, they are smarter and, probably, there is a certain sense in this, at least in bringing you as little blood as possible, but without solving those tasks that the president of the country has outlined, which he just confirmed today the minister of defense of the country. in general, instead of what negotiations are impossible, because otherwise the famous phrase will continue. boris filatova negotiates with them everything about anything, we will hang them later, this is already a law. yes, but at the same time, everything that is happening now, at this stage, there is not a word.

and well, from the rejection of those goals that, yes, er, have been set in relation to this. yes, they will somehow be reached. this is important. it is very important to understand. yes, you had a remark was a remark about subjectivity. please note that for all that everything is correct, what you are talking about remote subjectivity, but even if today's ukrainian hands. well, turn on the president - it’s natural, they will sign a renunciation of crimea and donbass in all forms, this will be a legal fact, which doesn’t care if there is subjectivity there or not, from now on, any the actions of all sorts of different armed formations there will be absolutely illegal. at all. they will represent no one. you see, here's what we're talking about. and of course, it is not a subject. i want to continue this topic. i want to remind you that our demand was not only ukraine but our fish was a block. it is necessary to return like this from the position of the ninety-seventh year, when we said, yes, and it remains

. here from our border remains in force. we need to look at ukraine to draw conclusions. now i wanted to ask, did your ukrainians give you so many guarantees there, did anyone keep their promises? no one except to push you into this one. exposed war and watch from afar enjoy. you look at biden on this means the british prime minister this home secretary, what kind of smile? i'm not like they dreamed about it, which pits you russians. i did not achieve this help to you, well, except to supply wood so that you burn more and faster. they nothing else will be done, because not a single english and american soldier will die for the interest of ukraine, but rather it will. then you want a guarantee. you are the only one who can give you a guarantee, this is russia, from the very beginning of the ninety-first year you had to immediately

negotiate with russia in a brotherly way, when you had nothing , we had a big debt agreement. it was a collaboration. well, i thought it was necessary further, but your actions for the last 30 years have been directed against the interests of russia and forcing enmity and russophobia are facts that you cannot deny. and that's why the guys who gave you guarantees didn't give you this whole thing. they didn't even officially give you one. yes, we did not verbally give you just pushed with hints. and i perceived this as hints, as they don’t want to talk about it, then in reality they will come. there, we need to come to the rescue there, although officially i have heard many times that you are following this event. ha, i want to understand whether the americans or nato will officially at least verbally say that they are ready. we brought the gate nato and so on are all official faces, but ukraine is not ready for ukraine to be. but you didn't hear it. you were so blinded by russophobia. and

here, please, the results, which are not yet stamps. timothy, you said about the crimea and about donetsk luhansk this very important issue. and he, too, is on the negotiating table. why do we say that the neutral status of us, and then here is the territory, crimea, the territory of the donetsk lu. for example, for example, president zelensky says, i admit i sign. so what it won't be anything, without it, it won't be worth anything. if ukraine only recognizes itself, crimea itself recognizes the dpr, so if you first don’t follow the path of minsk again, two paths, but it won’t work. it won’t work. i want to say that we are striving for the european union, and we say we wanted the european union, we are going to the european court, then the territory of crimea and don donetsk have a special

status. what kind of external control will it be for me dima firstly, let's take turns, please, because no one hears anything and does not you know, when you don't hide. well, did you say your thoughts or do you want to go to the podium and broadcast one? it just won't work here. thanks for not wanting. now let's go to crimea and donbas and what do you want? first, here is your horns there wrote a list of ten states. approximately there is israel or more, there is something else and so on. so i can say, now, if you continue, there will be no peace agreement to insist on this. those whom you consider to be guarantors will disrupt the peace agreement and put you back in the furnace war. here's what they'll do first. maybe wait now. i explain, i explain, but for some reason your side drags. why haven't you called

yet? eh, i don't know, i don't want to offend any country. well, you can also call africa, for example, to call one through america well, so that the table was to salt us, most likely, that people, wait, it doesn’t work experience of the coup d’état in budapest, because i can tell you now, that’s all you got everything, and with you, of course, russia and europe and a lot of people there is a consequence. there is a consequence of what you did on the maidan in 1914. here, start from this point, and then write him random and everything else. and now you understand that i am the most in this whole story, that you still don’t want to understand anything about what happened, you don’t want to stubbornly. that's how you do it, it's not me, it's not me, it didn't happen to me.

it's kind of a coincidence. this is a malicious russia and a biden betrayal. and you understand that in this reasoning there is no ukraine you. and if it is not in your reasoning, then it will not be, after all, this is advertising, then we will continue. the military special operation in ukraine is still the main news. she became the catalyst for the complete transformation of the world, we are witnessing this transformation. and we have something to say about this. do not miss the evening with vladimir solovyov special issue today at 21:20 on the russia channel and now it is especially important to find someone to whom you can entrust your savings.

take care of everything that is important to you with a cumulative with an account from vtb with a rate of 20% per annum and the reliability of a proven vtb bank, everything will work out. with cardiomagnyl your heart is a complex mechanism and regular intake of cardiomagnyl helps to take care of its health. with cardiomagnyl, heart health is under control every day, the vtb team and get more pensioners from it will be credited with 2,000 rubles. impressive rate on the vtb savings account, everything will work out easily. every organism is unique

everyone needs their own unique approach to health. sber and pharmacy will deliver medicines that are right for you with bergi pharmacy order medicine with delivery. so the galaxy line kettle with touch control for only 1990 rubles. generous discounts to verbat. each organism is unique, each needs its own unique approach to health. sber and the pharmacy will deliver medicines that are right for you. download the app sberbank and pharmacy cherkizovo presents no moms, not like that, who doesn’t do that anymore. i have to look. look like this. well,

mom, try delicious. and i'm so tasty, which is right for you pharmacy. i just want to renew osago at the normal price of insurance, look at reviews and ratings and buy osago can be compared in parallel with one and a half million and one more car and generous discounts. we will deliver a medicine that is right for you sberbank and a pharmacy order medicines with delivery. on channel

russia 1 we continue our discussion. you know, i see how all negotiations arise, they consider, they begin to consider what seemed like a month. well, it's impossible. what is the month back? you don’t answer this rhetorical question, for god’s sake. why didn’t zelensky write a letter to putin a month ago saying that i agree to a neutral status and the absence of bases, and also agreed to something there because, uh, donbass yes, at me there recognized by the republic but we will be again. and what was not written a month ago in zalinsky, this is a rhetorical question, you understand, and such questions will arise more and more. this is how the same gas issues will arise in europe. well, that's all discussed, by the way, vasily again again, you are being addressed with historical questions. you remember, here you

are very emotionally raised voices. chelly, like russia and kirdyk, because the dollar was 127 something. you said those words right there. i would, if i were, you know, now, if i had such, well, how would the desire e to do something like that, then i would say vasily then you should now say that russia has blossomed unusually . but if you have one dependency with another, as if logically linked, then you would have to do it. i’m just what it’s all about now, shoigu told the course of the military operation that it would continue and donbass with the alternative that rodion indicated would be recognized states. the demilitarization of ukraine will decide its own fate by eliminating the group, donskoy well, according to my estimates. i said this, by the way, 10 days ago on the air, that

the liquidation of the group solves the issue of demilitarization of interest. 80 i'm not a military man, i appreciate it, yes, i could be wrong, well, welcome, how much does this solve the issue of denocification, for example, azov, who did not leave mariupol and went to banderira. it's hard for me to say, well, he decides, yes, he decides, but about gas it's very interesting. peskov was asked, here, uh, western correspondents in a conversation in english somewhere reminded me of a quote from a movie. i will not repeat it, but look how peskov answered about selling e-gas for rubles. we are definitely not going to do charity work to supply gas for free to western europe if vladimir putin insists on paying in rubles. they they will instruct that they will not pay rubles near a european. so the question is are you going to turn off

the gas as the case may be. no payment. no, gas, no, that's the money in the morning. you can, on the contrary, here in general this is the story with gas. this morning i am with a man who has worked a lot in the financial sector. moreover , he worked precisely with western countries and so on. he is hardly a very intelligent person. i know him very old school, not the current tribe. here he is all the time picking up words to just not ska. up to the russian language, so to speak, but already the one that cannot be used on the air, what is happening now is some kind of phantasmagoria. in my opinion. well true, that is, you remember ma