who shouted crimea would be ukrainian deserted and it definitely worked? that's just biden fell for this bait. putin has enough brazen cigarettes that he denocifies ukraine is a lie. it's just cynical. she knows it, it's also obscene. zelensky was elected democratic, he is a jew, his father was destroyed during the nazis as a philosopher, the idea of ​​​​korchinsky worked perfectly for the nazi and quotes him, of course, and now they quietly calmly took him under cover, they put the fool, yes, and behind his back, nazism rises in full growth, they do everything advertising crimes. i

saw you with him. i saw the way you looked at him. where do you know sophia from? history of russia sophia today immediately after the program evening with vladimir solovyov 60 minutes we have a special edition, we start with urgent news nato turns into a show of american halls no special opinions a certain trap is ready for them friends you first imposed sanctions, if you want gas,

now think for yourselves by your financial institutions how to get around these sanctions, it's 60 minutes. do not miss tomorrow at 11:30 and 17:30 on the channel, russia what kind of flying head kolobok did not want to watch better russian cinema

only on the russia channel hello this is a special broadcast on the station, which few people know yet, we have moved forward, in order to be the first to know their main points, we found points by which we can predict common positions. set up on the spot.

for the international military tribunal in nuremberg, no one will close the borders for us. i'm from paris is always together, always online, kind of strong, he’s cool, but it doesn’t seem to break down. we watch gagarin’s masterpieces of world documentary films . we really miss exclusives right now. for 15 years, for free without registration, we have been watching in the application or on the website at the

radio station conducted surveys of 75% of people, they said that they were ready for the negotiation to support the negotiation process if, so to speak, the agreements are on the conditions that russia is talking about. i assure you. if such a question would have been held in ukraine, it would have been the same result is the point. this is the confrontation that is happening today, what does it mean, it means that no one will stop anything. everything will continue and develop as it was planned, nothing changes absolutely, now you know about the negotiations. uh, negotiations, it seems to me, well, we already have eight years of experience, well, almost eight years of negotiating experience. they can be considered not from the point of view of achieving some result there, but hope for it, but from the point of view of understanding that the people who take part in this negotiation process considers

the process itself as one of the elements of the information company. that's what we saw today, negotiations were held yesterday. it's you who think about this proposal of the ukrainian side, with which they came. this is their negotiating position, and which they themselves ultimately simply abandoned. well, yes, they veiled it. yes, everything, what did they come with? i'm not saying that inside ukraine itself, well, to put it mildly, it caused great, so to speak discussions, let's say so, if you can call it that. yes, to put it mildly, that is what the conversation is about, that the people who participate in this negotiation process, they set themselves the goal of spectacularity, and inefficiency. they do not set a goal to achieve any result, understanding the ukrainian side, they wanted to go to turkey to

sunbathe from the war. negotiation process. i'm talking about those people who in one way or another represent the political elite of the country, but here i want to, so i just want to ask myself a question. but let's be clear, give it to ourselves in order to understand with whom we are negotiating, we will answer the question, and the people with whom we are negotiating, they are representatives of the ukrainian people, or they are e-lobbies of foreign special services who generally perform. functions on the territory of ukraine, another question follows from this. and where are the decision-making centers evaluation of adoption decisions in london and washington based on this, then, if it makes sense at all, in principle, to talk to people who have certain formal

powers. yes, they do not have the real ability to make decisions. and even worse from the fact that they do not have the opportunity to implement them within the country itself. why did what happened happen, but it happened because the delegation that flew to these negotiations after the whole process was made public, yes, they saw the reaction of various political players inside ukraine and understood immediately. no-no-no, wait, we said something superfluous there, probably, let's, we somehow differently rodion already spoke about this scheme. well , listen, someone might even believe in the idea that this is the order. oh, which they say, could in principle be involved, right? can anyone at all? here they are talking about some kind of referendum and listen to it yourself, i have no doubt. no, i'm a degenerate daughter. i have no doubt that following the results of the war in ukraine, so to speak, there will be a referendum. i

have doubts. that's what they're in they will have to do with it. what will they have to do with it ? and if they think that this is the scheme that they have prescribed, they say, but they came to negotiate. so here is our position. well, zelensky can declare himself the winner. if, uh, ukraine completely loses donetsk or will it be mental that there is no crimea now, what if it completely loses access to the sea of ​​​​azov to the black? i will still say zelensky, i defeated everyone. and then he quietly quietly says. i won the election, and then he asked a question. and how will i to feed what i have left, when the economy is destroyed, he will say, foreigners will give us money foreigners will not give money they themselves have hunger and insane prices, well, they will not have any energy of ukraine because no

gas will go through them. they will not be a transit. they are like idiots addressing the chinese. they are trying to be rude, forgetting that they previously threw the chinese for 3 billion. and the chinese do not forgive such things, and they try to point them out through their lips. here zelensky will say that i am your savior, but he will have handed out gangs of 300,000 machine guns, which will talk, but eat us than save and at home he promised to stop us all. and with what money will you install them, and where will you get building materials for heating? what will we be, but where will the bread come from? and at what price? in fact, they are absolutely not interested and you can talk about the warring principalities. look, americans, americans. today the americans today declare that they want to turn ukraine into afghanistan well, that's how it is. so. hey, vasily e is indignant about the bill introduced, which i spoke about here for spare parts, and

there the famine thinks, i understand that they will not invest any restoration regarding the ban on such money to the orthodox church. but i ask vasily a question and say. but tell me. look, here's the logic. yes, the americans say that they want to turn ukraine into afghanistan, there is a group of deputies in which they are called growers, who are throwing a bill into the supreme council. prohibition, say it fits me. well, how would the project implement the idea to transform ukraine? yes, it fits. and then the next question arises. so these people are who? these are people's deputies of ukraine or agents of influence of the united states of america within ukraine itself, what are these people who implement anti-ukrainian projects within ukraine itself? but this is a rhetorical question. yes, to which it is still necessary to give an answer, who are we dealing with in ukraine and a very orthodox man with a mustache. who is the enemy well,

his church, who raised his hand, who is with him now brother? yes, it is time for us to ask a number of questions of people who, including in kiev, were overly emotional in the first days. well, i'm not justifying them, i understand the logic. yes, because there is a society that is in psychosis from here. i actually have 3 theses. well, related precisely to this situation the first is about discipline. we must understand. why, this is the situation that happened with the negotiations. she, firstly, i once again emphasized this idea, they cannot be called negotiations on our part. these are contacts. this very important. this is exactly what we need to fight for, so that in the news it will be contacts contacts contacts negotiations. we don't lead. this is the temperature of labor. yes, ready to capitulate. we'll let everything down

further there for now with a nurse, in general it seemed that so they simply demanded capitulation from the russians. and we do not change yet did not understand. we later with general wolf, as we know, contacts were also maintained. oh, no big deal. well, in this sense, from vermah. they were also supported. this is very important about discipline, because society is in a very difficult situation. and what i'm trying to explain is this thesis number two. we are going, we are watching the information war, and in parallel there is a cognitive war, what i am now studying very carefully, what the americans are doing, and in a cognitive war, society is in a situation where it is important not only what they say, firstly , this should be said shortly enough. secondly, as they say, that is, what our contactee looked like, not the negotiator contactee. that's just how he is looked. with what expression on his face he said it, how insecure it was for people who are in a cognitive sense and it doesn’t matter what you said, it’s important in general because nothing important, as it is. if

he had the same. well, roughly speaking, he said, here. to rodion we say, yes, that is, calmly in such a voice. this is perfect, otherwise rodion would be handsome. here is a miracle, this is how it should be and what is very important. that's given that society is in this cognitive state, for now. yes. i believe that every phrase about contacts you should always add that this has nothing to do with the tasks set for the demobilization of identification and people just need to repeat everything. i mean, they are very hard. well, very nice ideas. this is contact contacts and from here. it is very much in this second thesis that the information-psychological state of society is our main agitators in the future in the near future. these will be residents of the liberated territories. they will be the main meditators we people from tv. and here is the peaceful life that they will have if it is broadcast in kiev well, there further, even in the order, it will be a

completely different picture. well, well, guys, well, of course, it’s possible to do everything with zelensky all evening, i’ll ruin the biden, said we won’t make such decisions of military assistance to ukraine that would lead to a direct military confrontation between the united states and russia, said the white house the united states made it clear that they do not want to allow a military clash with russia will in every possible way avoid steps in this direction, you know , explain something, because the other things asked are spoken cognitively. and this please note that ostensibly our armies are not fulfilling tasks only the british say. here the american military experts just see everything in a completely different way britain american military experts just see. what type of weapon do we have? about how we do it, how accurately we deliver. how many of these

weapons, and how we have already dismantled the 260,000 second-hand terrorist defense group with a small thousand, is another question, what i would like to see more of ours enter there and decide faster, but the americans just understand, they saw weapons in action. and they understand that this is not the army they want to mess with. and while finishing off zelensky, the white house says the united states is not yet ready to speak specifically, but the opportunity to become a guarantor of security. no, they are also british. they also gave such a wording to the border, but nevertheless it means that the guys. they don't believe in your future at all i am at stake in the morning. how much of that britain is there. maybe we need to talk to them? just objectively, so the center of the busy decision very clearly described the area of ​​\u200b\u200bbritain, but he compared with him nuclear continue, but we signal we are not stalinists. here are the people who

are with us. we still communicate and actively communicate with kherson and melitopol. well, let's say there with colleagues who are inside there before they become our main agitators. we need to quickly resolve the issue of calming the society. there in place. it is only solved. well, right in the field, as we joke with colleagues. yes, that is, roughly speaking, we need some new qualification for a political technologist. yes, that is rude speaking, we need to re-twist the social bonds in this society. let's get a look. well, that's what any liberated city is. he lives in his own reality. he no longer lives in the area. not in ukraine from there. half of the chief has fled. here, i mean new, which means that we need to bring in teachers and educators. this means that with children, this is how it is rightly said. it will be necessary to work and tell what is needed, if you want to dilute them. i want to argue with you. there are people who are ready to do it. because no. you just need new training programs. that's

enough. i'm talking about something else, you need to help specialists. that is, simply, of course, to come, to help, to work, as it was, by the way, in the history of ukraine when they went from donetsk to learn the fish sea, including cutting off in the first place. he sketched the work, but here it is two by three. i think it's probably 10 years. to be honest, it's okay, we have all the time miracles do not happen, that's why we have so many hours of the day. we only have time. how much it is necessary to understand that it is to understand that russia is now passing over forever. here it is necessary to understand that the periods of this are over. i think the russian flag. he must never come down. i think one of the emperors, as soon as people come to the store and see russian goods that they can buy for the hryvnia that they have in their hands, they will immediately understand everything, or they should have it exchanged for rubles, for

which they will buy at a bargain prices, and well, you're already talking about teachers. yes, that's exactly what i wanted to say. the third thesis is political. yes, that is, what we see from the entire coalition is ready to actively act so far, only poland, but after such messages. they also lose their desire. let me remind you that poland itself is in a situation of split. i believe that it is specifically in relation to poland that we need to actively raise the stakes, and firstly, explain what this is fraught with. and secondly, i want to remind you, well, for a second, what we call rzeszow is, in fact, the ancient russian city of ryazshiv, founded by danila galilevsky, the city of whom, which they call helm. this is the hill where danila galitsky and wheat are buried. the russian city of perm, he will say. well, maybe it's time to decide from poland how much there will actually be, really. and for example, in bialystok there is an oppressed belarusian minority who are not allowed to open schools in the belarusian language to survive the next couple of years of an economic

crisis that they have not yet seen. thank you guys talks. i will speak first on the two talks, but, in my opinion, the minsk process is over, the normandy format does not work, but there is there are created republics in russia, you are fighting to liberate them completely, that is, what can we talk about? but yesterday's istanbul process, which began. i would like from a different point of view. here you are talking about the reaction of the united states of america we are the ukrainian delegation. and i said yesterday, i personally saw it and, uh, brought a draft treaty not only for you, for russia, but also for all countries that are ready to provide guarantees to ukraine is not enough, that, moreover, i didn’t interrupt anyone. moreover, how do you russia if you remember, you also demanded guarantees, and the united states of america from nato on december 15 , and as i understand it, these two processes are connected, if yesterday’s e yesterday’s events, and there,

i remind you, there was another person that we didn’t we say mr. abramovich appeared there. and who is the role that i don’t want to underestimate, but i don’t want to overestimate either, but thanks to him. i didn't interrupt you either, but he was entrusted with this trial. he successfully did it, that is, he is his and the president of turkey in this case involved in the process was to him in russian the organization of these negotiations, because well, i'm done now, just say, if it's just for us, more precisely, that he understood, come on and to whom it was, that is. to quote mr. peskov, do you know who he is? yes, he answered today that abramovich was abramovich, uh, participated in this process, because both sides agreed on his candidacy verbatim. this does not mean that we entrusted something to him. i'm talking about the fact that thanks to this person this event took place. i don't

i'm used to it, i'm not exaggerating the role, but nevertheless. let's remember this process. uh, it started what i think and how people say to ukraine, we, uh, this process should end with some kind of conference on the security of ukraine . yes , i'm talking about ukraine as a change in ukraine yes , and a draft treaty that was created by the governments of different countries. today, for example, yes, it has already been said that great britain it was said that they are ready to become a guarantor country, but ah, article fifth of nato, let's. we will look at it differently, germany said, we are ready to become the guarantor of the country. america, so much that you said today was a question, and when foreign minister lavrov met with his colleague, china also had a question, and the representative of

china left from direct. he didn't give a straight answer. he said that, wisely, we are for the peace process, but as you say, evasive. yes, there was a finished answer, nevertheless, see the leaders of so many states already so different from uh, said responded to this process. that is, he goes to have positions, and then there will be coordination and coordination , including, first of all, sausages of the federation and vladimir rudolfovich, and in parallel, what you say, if the united states says so, you know such from philosophers. but, perhaps putin will talk with biden. and perhaps biden will burn out putin, and perhaps impossible is impossible. and perhaps what they will talk about, they will also talk about guarantees, including the process that you started on december 15 and so he voiced, and then the frame is. in one , it is impossible to enter into any kind of negotiations, it is impossible , negotiations from the west with russia without resolving the

issues of ukraine's guarantee, since this is some kind of level. but what kind of ukraine? and now look, when is the borders of this studio, what kind of ukrainian is this studio? they're already sharing. everything is trying to tell. how it will be i remember how the newspaper bild wrote different. uh, i drew on the map. what composition of ukraine will be the top of buguns who will make us pozhimeru sum week, then novorossiya, then little russia, then already uh, western ukraine actually pilfered among themselves more hungary-romania. there are different opinions, but either way or, uh, the collective guarantors of the country, the guarantors, will agree on how it will be and what will happen next or there, if they do not agree, of course there is, your version of the russian version you will go to, yes, you will go to lutsk tanks will go where you want your rocket to fly from there. that's what you want, that is, you will fight. yes indeed. how much you

want to? note. we don't run out of missiles anymore with these. the department of defense said there are thousands and something of missiles. already, well, in principle, another 1.000 with something you feel sorry for ukraine, you need its rocket, we don’t feel sorry, right? we feel sorry for ukraine, so on the 24th the president of the russian federation sent you a signal. get out, please, your troops from the territory of the lc. dpr heard this signal, you understand, this signal is already heard by more than 4 million ukrainians who were forced to immigrate, who became poor, yes, but it was too signal is a good choice eight years, you know? it was their choice. yes, here they lived, they were bad, maybe they had some wrong opinion. maybe they were subhuman, but they did not have to be kicked out by the decision of this studio for 8

years. unfortunately donbass was killed, look, i understand, when i hear the reaction of your politicians. church, well, politics in the first place, yes, russian to the fact that medinsky is wrong and there is envy, guys. i congratulate you, your period has begun. zrada win you started this period and you talk favorably about, listen, uh, there are people who talked, took the documents and went to work. and here we have it, i saw dozens. i have seen it a thousand times in ukraine. yes? here, let's find out where the medical growth comes from and punish him for what he said. maybe he is in ukraine, you can understand ukraine, firstly, he is ukrainian, that this is not a place. why do i say this madness needs to be adventured? well, you need to stop, because and you carefully say it again, you carefully read points that ukraine or you wonder who said what and so on, you know, we don't care. well

, then you clearly clearly said that there are conditions that you must fulfill. we have been in the negotiation process with you for 8 years. we asked the process to end . we asked you. stop stuffing donbass to go. what do you think, million pavlovich, if for eight years we were in the negotiation process with you, watching you try to negotiate with the donbass, and all these eight years you lied, dodged spitting on a resolution without the un in this the moment they continued to kill the inhabitants of donbass, do you think that after that we entered the nazi authorities, we believe no one says that you think that we believe that they said, although, of course, to horror it. well, it is believed that we will believe at least some of your agreements that must be trusted, right? let's agree. come on here

britain talk to germany we don't have to talk to these countries. then you will bomb our supreme commander-in-chief. our share means clearly formulated the goals and objectives of the special military operation. and they will be fulfilled, they will be fulfilled. you have the opportunity to get by with little blood, either you decide the fate of the unfortunate people who your nazi authorities have taken hostage and who are now suffering from a humanitarian catastrophe in kharkov so you are then fucking safe. we have never been at all. if you didn’t bluff, sit down, talk to the table, you should sit down with you, you are talking to the nazi authorities, who will be transferred to the nazis. yes, i remember someone one said, "how is stalin with hitler will sit down for negotiations if the great patriotic war is on. well, why listen, you took your people hostage? i want to remind you of the tragedy, leningrad, yes. do you remember that the soviet army,

where the soviet army fought, left the city and fought with the nazi hordes, defending leningrad. what are you doing to the soviet army? what are you doing , the rural ussr was also part of the soviet union and the ukrainians were part of the red army of the soviet army please tell me you have a lot of monuments to soviet generals soldiers liberators now, well monuments. well, of course, i saw many monuments, which i lit. yes last time. i saw a lot seriously. yes, dozens of them. i personally saw forever the fire that you ate for 7 years, and so it will be everywhere. good idea, smart, beautiful and a real good fellow. and she lit up. that's

right, an element of denazification on that, see you tomorrow.