the situation with ukraine is, in general, a clarification of the main issue. will the world be free from the approach that america considered the condition of its existence, it rules the world, all the rest are colonies to one degree or another, and this is what we are talking about and around this there will be a main struggle, you know, i'm lately. that's what i think about the most when i watch the speeches of the political leaders of the countries there, especially, uh, the ministers of foreign affairs there and so on. and now i understand that, uh, our minister of foreign affairs, he is also stubborn uh uh hmm workers, yes, those diplomats whom we knew, probably, many of you have already seen the speech on cnn today on the former ambassador to the ussr, jack broom, i must show, because you will continue right away. after that, let's see, a very

curious performance. in my opinion, the most important goal now is to end the conflict in ukraine, and this can only be achieved through diplomacy. i have to interrupt you about diplomacy. i wanted to talk a little later. excuse me, but now let's discuss what we saw in the butch according to zelensky, this is evidence that ukrainians are simply treated like animals and called it genocide, he also said that after what he saw in the bucha, it is difficult to lead. at least some negotiations with russia, and even after this, you think that the conflict can be ended through diplomacy. firstly, we do not know exactly what actually happened in the bucha, and secondly, there is no evidence that moscow is to blame for this. the fact is that the ukrainians need to make a deal with russia so that she could keep crimea for itself, where the majority of the population is russian and where their naval base is located, because the creation of a nuclear power from russia and

a strange pariah equivalent to the united states is definitely not in our interests. but everything is very clear precisely said, one moment, only now cnn could see how the presenter was pierced with a current. yes, here is the second one, and as far as i know, what i understood on the tin website, this did not appear. it didn't appear, it did. and so the occasion was already said to be jack matlock. in general, hardly on cnn more will appear given that he is 92 years old. in general, of course, the guy looks in his 92 years. great, but i'm talking about something else, and i'm talking about the quality of those people who made decisions, who were engaged in diplomacy and so on. and these questions i have is whether it is this, or is it really that the level of those people who are engaged in diplomacy has dropped so much, and which led to the catastrophic consequences that we now

have in international relations, or is it that international relations have become such, what are they are now required. other heroes and other diplomats, that's just a mystery to me, but in fact, uh, uh, what the mattles were talking about now, after all, uh, many people. well, metric definitely cannot be suspected of love. there or some special relationship to russia there in the soviet union and so on. he was also engaged in the fact that he fought with us and there was a confrontation between the socialist capitalist ideology there, and all this was superimposed and that's it. it was much. in theory, it should have been much more serious speech. well , then they managed, and everything was there, and there were special operations and supply of weapons to some. uh, a political terrorist or so on, but still, when it came to the possibility, the discovery, like this , yes, the beginning of the third world war there. still, the responsibility of these people was much.

better in my opinion, what i now hear and see, and the third. the world war and nuclear strikes began to be spoken about in such a way as about how about what really can happen tomorrow is the responsibility of one's own. for what may happen and lead, but if not disaster on a global scale, then to millions of victims. i just don’t see, i just don’t see more than that in different media, probably, it will be necessary to talk about this separately, but in the west they began to draw a line that, for example, the inclusion of nato at some point, uh, means nato ’s help in this conflict , a direct ukraine is not necessary, as long as such a wording does not necessarily lead to a third world nuclear war. this does not necessarily mean that thoughts are not only not denied. yes, she still seems to be dragged there. well, here, i listened to what went mattla

he spoke, and yesterday he is preparing his own commentary for the commissars; i carefully studied what the western press writes, what he says on tv channels and with uh, i must state with regret. this is the eye that cries out in the wilderness. that is, no one follows. and among the journalists among the invited experts, nothing most painful for us among the current politicians perceives the events in the storm, as it perceives the matlock, which admits at least doubts. that is, he does not say that they did it, the ukrainians do not say there, like dmitry the submarines said that ukraine was a british provocation. he just allows doubts. well, he wants an obvious investigation. no, then, e for western and public opinion. unfortunately, the politicians are certainly of the political class, everything is already clear. that is, the culprit has already been identified, there is already an absolute evil of this russian aggression and there is a victim of aggression and the thought is not allowed, even theoretically

that it is a victim. maybe somewhere a little. i speak my feelings. you will then tell about yours, which will certainly be different, so here's the reality we have such a very unsightly one and today we see in the message, how from a cornucopia with about those who are preparing. european sanctions, which will be the most severe, that is, the impression that they were waiting for some such moment. what was the malaysian boyng like in july 2014, after which the sectoral sanctions on russia hit? here, accordingly , the opportunity will also be very interesting. yes, every time the same situation is reproduced, by the way, not necessarily. even if with russia yes, it can be syria. maybe somewhere else with cancer was test tube was the situation. by the way, you see, this is also interesting, but the sanctions are the most severe, when two facts were deduced. well, uh, which, by the way, have not been investigated in any way. here you are investigating. they don't give up on anything. just, well, scale and

needs. the case of the skripals and the case of patients in shorts are in no way inferior to any other case in any way. but there was no investigation. i'm just being categorical. here at i was told that i have a categorical wording. i have a categorical wording. there is a reason, because i look at the eternal history of the last ten years and i say. this is an absolutely reproducible plot, the consequence of which is the sanctions and the exorbitant growth of russophobia, which we spoke with you yesterday, because these two components are necessary for them. russophobia, as a genuine theological basis and sanctions, as a means of putting pressure on us and trying to destroy us, that's why i say that this is a decree among all

the rest, because if only there had been an investigation somewhere. well, one could doubt it. and so i can not agree you wanted to object. yes, i would like to strike, because in fact, uh, the american dupe stands, just not only in the face of the ambassador, but gives some back, and i remind you, just yesterday's statement by the pentagon of the pentagon of the official official representative of that they do not have any evidence of russian crimes in bucha. why is this really happening? it is clear that this is indeed an english operation. first of all, uh, and uh, the americans, who are well aware that after we have said it more than once, the robbery of europe is all with us somehow just for accuracy, the pentagon was told, so there is no data that could not be considered reliable, of course, you testify, then in congress under oath. god forbid, why did the moon recognize the presence of a white laboratory? that if you lie

is a felony, so the guys give back give the opportunity. well, yes, it’s not even the main thing here - no. the main thing is to look. really. in what was lavrov right, the goal here is not ukraine, the goal is not ukraine, it is obvious, but from everywhere. pay attention again. i'm repeating circuitry from everywhere. wherever the united states leaves, chaos remains everywhere. iraq afghanistan libya anything. and, if they are really leaving europe now and it looks very similar, then we will now talk not just, but the self-identification of ukraine, we will talk about the film adaptation of europe and russian troops. they won't need enough going out of europe. do you really think that? yes , everything, as an economist, unfortunately, everything is directly contraindicated. did you ask me not to interrupt me or not? i will explain spartacus 1:1. all i understood here is this, and when there is an obvious reason, it is connected with internal reasons, they are from afghanistan, according to you,

then they were going to leave. uh, causes internal causes. forgive the systemic economic, including the state of the united states of america itself, this is the main reason. they systematically leave, moreover, trump spoke about it and biden talks about it. and you can maxim still believe in linkin and dogs. yes, you understand the discussion. so, dear ones, i will creatively tell dialectically everything in the world. well, it’s arranged, because i think that the united states themselves do not fully know what they are doing with respect to europe, they know only one thing, that the resources that can be pumped out of there now need to be pumped out for sure, but you can see it, and there you can see the ministers. uh, at this meeting, he talked about other things, yes. he said that uh there is some progress in the negotiations, uh in the russian and ukrainian delegations, which are the istanbul negotiations or

the turkish-turkish negotiations. yes and yesterday, president zelensky, despite the entire territory, and about the storm, but understandable rhetoric. he said, however, that a not only did he say, he also signed a decree, which officially designated the ukrainian delegation at the talks. and the recommendations are distributed here. you will continue now , there president zelensky is just within the framework of negotiations, he spoke out, because, of course, he signed, but there is a problem, what and what, what of president zelensky’s signature, probably, look at the composition of the delegation or listen to what he says. let's look at the phrase about demilitarization. we are zabulls, after all , the day when we did not disappear to leave kiev , yes, he said more phrases of denotification. and the demilitarization of the concern we have for the denazification procedure sounds simply figurative. we can in your big courses this whole phrase and i showed it. ta the very butch we were testing wants and you, uh, before

yourself, put yourself in front of a mirror. tanya is clingy and demilitarization is the whole story, and in court in nato we are ready to enter tomorrow a check of something with the mind of russia, we do not hide. i am against the mountain and the enseku she is the leader. specifically, seeing what kind of ukraine's soup will lie in nato, we have already seen rich people rich, why be afraid to say what we think? i want tomorrow for us tomorrow, well, in our resident, but seriously i will have a brain, which means giving in. well, about what of course about what you can certainly have a difference between words and deeds and president zelensky when he speaks, do you understand that you live here? here, yes, listen, here is dear opponent. here you would

pshit. you laugh, you laugh. you are not that far off. you don't understand what a device is. listen listen to the easy man. just when you spoke, i listened to you attentively. behave tairata then there will be no. i will not be any state completely different than it is, rather than the structure of the russian state, the president of ukraine said state president of ukraine said you have no other way to say the prime minister. maybe the third one is to say parliament, maybe have their own point of view. uh, he doesn't need to, but so, wait a second, it's coming. well, i can't say a word. yes , one interrupts me. you understand, i will stand and listen. and you pshikat you now spent. let’s say that if president zelensky signed a public decree, he appointed a delegation, these delegations, almost in the same composition, have already met eight times. it’s clear that the process

negotiations are the most difficult and it is clear that the groups that exist can agree, as zelensky and lavrov say, you just need to hear it, yes. we are ready to give in to nato we were ready to join in on us, so we refuse to retreat into nato there was no when we speak. oh, when we talk about dmitry yes , there is a clause in the negotiating position, when the russian side says, here is ukraine a tight state that will and will have the right to have an army of 50.000. uh, military personnel by example there, well, for some example, our position we say, wait. even if we take the example in finland on the number from the population target. we want more of these items in the negotiations. and there are different positions, they can come to an agreement and will be able to conclude an agreement, fortunately they will not be able to. so some kind of continuation of hostilities. do you want that. eh, what i want,

i don't need much. here you are for some reason on the watering can, even now you jumped. why are you behaving like this? well , shut up. well, calmer, he's calm, you're not into it. see. i didn't name you here. please shut up, so i beg you not to use such terms in relation to people present at the studio. i beg you to interrupt me about this. yes, they interrupt us from time to time, i try to limit each one. this is as you know, but this is not a reason to call someone names with some words, not a reason. this is the first this is the first. now the second is the negotiation process. yes, we are very complex. there is a negotiation process. by the way, i am now talking about this negotiation process and sergey viktorovich i will show that everyone understands i have said more than once that the negotiation process is a complex mandatory part of a military

special operation. well, we started from the very beginning and we are continuing it, the second thing i say is that the main enemies of the negotiation process are britain and the united states. by the way, before sergey viktorovich i will show you mr. sullivan. let's get a look. we can't predict, but i just said that so far this conflict has been going on for a little over five weeks. but still during this time we have witnessed a huge amount of killing deaths, as well as a huge amount of courage, successes on the part of the ukrainian forces, which is what i mean when i say protracted. so it's that it may not just be a matter of weeks more, first of all, than this phase of conflict. how did you divorce russians measured in weeks? this is the next stage, maybe measured in months or longer, that is, yes, yes, yes, yes, here is the american position for the british.

we discussed. yes, but there is the position of the russian federation, by the way, clear is not unambiguous officials of the russian federation has never had such ambiguity as the ukrainian position has. why are you proud of it? you say that this is a feature of ukraine if you show the position yourself. and here simon is negotiating between ukraine and russia, you yourself are imposing this topic, that ukraine is independent, we are exactly under the americans, then negotiate with the british, then negotiate with the british. and we are here , maybe you will fight against england , britain and america. they knew vasily, you know that this is your problem of your lack of sovereignty , everything that you have received is a consequence of your loss of sovereignty. and now you say, i'm not me, but go millions of ukrainians. explain who are now walking around ukraine and asking one question. by the way, uh, the ukrainian people who live in

central ukraine have always been good - proud that they have one. well, prudence, yes, and they are now asking each other a question. how did we get so deceived, they told us. we were told by noises, brothers from the west, that they are with us at all forever, and now and all washed away. yes, so wait, it's not like that in this situation. honestly, well, or will you still speak in turn, or will our dialogue stop? by the way, our conversation with you, this is the exact tracing paper. you ca n't even control yourself. look what sergey sergey lavrov said, so i said that following the results of that round of negotiations that took place in istanbul on march 29. we saw the emergence of realism in the position of the

ukrainian delegation of realism. with regard to whether as for the way to ensure the security of ukraine , it has already become clear to the kiev representative that security guarantees cannot be obtained in nato and that joining nato should be forgotten, and more realism is the need to secure the neutral status of ukraine in the treaty, of course, its non-nuclear status, given flirting with this topic, which has been voiced over the past few months from the lips of the ukrainian leaders, and certainly in the position of the ukrainian delegation. there is much more realism and regarding the status of crimea and the donetsk luhansk people's republics, as for chances, you know, there are always chances. i have already spoken about this more than once, and we are aimed at ensuring that all these chances to realize the

goals of our operation are announced by the president, and we are working to ensure that these goals are fixed. and in the treaty, which is now being discussed, they are being prepared. i hope he will eventually be created and finally formulated in all his provisions. yes, the goals of the operation should be fixed in the contract. to whom it is not clear pronata was told that lavrov’s assessment of the position on nato is and is, by the way, zelensky’s assessment here, just think and live with it, then don’t complain that your, uh, your masters are deceiving. i would like to say a few important things. first, because of course. uh, realism, these are the ones that shift the concessions of the ukrainian side, it just came in a written format, and so on. vasily found concessions were

made only after the start of the special operation before the special operation, how much we did not apply, we were 7 years old they talked about it, and with anyone, then i just threw us away. they just defiantly threw out how they forced them to write what they wanted to write. this is the first second, of course. here i agree that it was indignant, of course, it is necessary. i would like to talk not with this delegation. we would like to talk about the fate of ukraine with washington, someone makes the decision, of course. in this case, we see just such an incomprehensible receipt. by the way, now pardon an important thought. this is exactly what a colleague says. thoughts. and now look here. here we could be talking to washington. i can also say that we talked with washington, we sent demands to washington in december, but washington is now pushing you washington says, well, we would not be in a hurry to conclude an agreement, but decide ukraine not well, tambov ukraine yes, you

see, we have no no. wait, which side are you asking if you have a chance to hack the dominion system, it's hard for me to say, it's hard to say, you know? well, this is all the more so since not a single ukraine has not attempted to get out of colonial dependence on the united states over the years, and washington is pushing you into this position. this is how we wrote our demands to washington, you see, leave your vassals alone. but it was, well, written to him. yes, they warned that we would answer , the month of december, look. that's just direct news to this nato provides support, that is, it pumps weapons to ukraine, but the russian federation, uh, with the russian federation, kiev must determine itself. that's all. you see , stoltenberg said, come on, you are afghanistan, that is, basically die. is that you eh? well, here's the nuance.

here there are very good shows. you are talking about this, that right after this storm. uh, president zelensky announces a new ukakas to the negotiating group. you to me. i'm sorry, i'm guilty of you. i have to break now for an advertisement right after you continue. what else is the flying head of kolobok unusual? what's in the past that invincible patrol boats? i have a suggestion. i wish this night would never end.

rack on the channel russia, we work at the post office of the bank, because we value stability just as much as you do and we are always happy to meet you in every branch throughout russia a. if you have no time to meet in person, visit our mobile application. you are waiting for high rates on deposits, and also cards of payment systems of the new time, so that it becomes comfortable in the old way, but in a new way, the post office bank team vtb vtb pension and get more pensioners from it. the bank will be cleared of 2,000 rubles. impressive savings account rate, everything

will work out easily. how long can you wait for a courier? order cosmetics at apteka.ru 20% discount on your first order. why do you need a lot of cards when there is one halva with an installment plan for 10 months up to 6%. the strengths of different cards are collected in one halva, just one card for everything does not make me look like. mom make more please. and the virus can cause me so tasty. drome natural medicine

ginkoum protects against blood clots reduces blood viscosity and improves memory ginkoum from the company evalar and protects against blood clots and improves memory created. use find who when scanned. look, kind and supper together more good. watching this, just put the smartphone's camera on the qr-code and download the application. that's all you need. now we watch all the news with video live broadcast of all tv channels and the largest collection of movies, tv series programs in your hands in the application or on the website for free without registration,

watch today the special edition of the program 60 minutes, all the latest news about the situation in ukraine and in the world. we go on the air right after fun today 17:30 on the channel, russia this is a program who is against on the channel russia 1 we continue our discussion please. pay attention to how our american pseudo-partners act. they talk about the fact that the conflict must be ended sometime there at some time. but they are all needed somewhere in the negotiation process. we need them because there are people there and so on humanitarian issues. we want to somehow achieve that ukraine needs something, and this is what happens. it would seem that now the position of ukraine is this, if the training in the

burcha is like this, here we shine, and so on and so similar. here it says something about a group that should sit at the negotiating table. you also need to negotiate. what are you talking about? they are looking for us, how to push them through, so, as they said, diplomacy has ended correctly. after tweeting on trump diplomacy millions of people are watching this live, a million people are discussing, they are dragging a billion people of the western world on us . that is, we put this, you know, uh, well, there are criminals, who, from the big mountain themselves, are even trying to talk in this like crushing. here we must make the conditions that zelensky said, you understand, the goal is to push us through the negotiations. here, no more. well, i would say, not at the negotiations, they generally want to push through, because that's when maxim and i discussed that these technologies are reproducible. this is where everything is confirmed. that hysteria that has risen in europe, by the way, is also very interesting, but we are expelling diplomats, but about gas and oil, yes

everything was said about gas and oil, including burbock. by the way, i didn’t understand, maybe someone understood what happened sideways, because 3 days ago she said that everything had to be broken. here's the money it's no, i understand what it is, well, i understand that it's an american absolutely so to speak one. yes, well, green and everything that happens there, but she 's just a member of the government. so the government is well aware that germany will not be able to live without russia. you can ask a wonderful question three days ago. uh, the government didn't get it when ber god told us that we yes, we must go out and break everything, it will be right, but now anna lena ber is the maximum such that she needs to explain that she needs to work. here, and the male’s blood came, he explained, after that she spoke a little differently, so i think either chancellor schultz or someone else from the more experienced representatives of the government explained to her, despite the fact that hearing and bad. we are still educating our

youth. yes, i remembered the classic immortal stuffing maxim's version is so humane. actually in fact, of course, we understand that green money is american money, and in the event that we really close all the taps leaving gas from europe, then, uh, the americans cannot close this hole now in the coming months. and who will be to blame, these same green ones, it turns out, they won’t need them in the next month, because now is the warm season, but the americans still have a moment , it’s not only warmer, friends, it’s not only warmer business in industry, first of all, because that the shutdown of the industry is inevitable fact. here is the measure. i showed them, they harvest firewood, you see, well then it’s by november by december, that is, before that, there are still priorities, which means there are very few pages in the world that own the sovereignty of ger