really different. you look at the reaction. some of our young people on the fact that their instagram was blocked, that is, what mikhail kovalchuk spoke about happened, they cut down the switch. and that look trying to calm down. well, i don’t know what to do, how can i make money on blogging. it 's just that it's all life. this is the soul. this is what i wake up and go to sleep fucking 5 years in a row really hard, because when something happens in your life, you have no idea how important this support of 23 million and almost 400,000 subscribers. i don't i'm afraid to admit that i don't want to lose you.

instagram bad evil was done by stupid youngsters on instagram people who will give me paper for my birthday or maybe sheet four, why was niton banned? no, that will eat something, do not give. you're not mcdonald's this is crying real. this is it. well, here you are remove these words and look at this face. this is the face of the most unfortunate man. just like these faces, weeping crying people who didn’t lose instagram, but lose their own children’s lives. these are the young our people, they know something about them, we are

aware of the level. the level of attitude to the world in general to the world to what is happening, but brother, this is a disaster. and here 's one more thing. i have said many times that i am interested in not condemning, not imposing my opinion. i want to compare facts. and i'm interested in answering questions. for example, remember we told you about olga skobeeva, who shared her childhood memories. look, parents tried to give the best education and here in our provincial the city, volzhsky, an american school appears, i was immediately given a russian

american school there. it was with a religious bias, as the day began in the russian american school in the nineties, and the provincial city of volzhsky, we were six seven-year-old children, were put in a circle. and ah, in our class, the american flag hung the russian-american school and my day at 6.7 years old. eh, it started like this. i still. i'm 36 i remember these words we swore an oath to the american flag. i told at the uh meeting e military historical society. well, he said so, because the patriotic upbringing and so on were touched upon in general by the chairman of this meeting. uh, presidential aide, vladimir medinsky said. ah such idea, that

for discussion. and why not really accept this experience and from childhood instill the interests of respect for state symbols. well flank and so on. there was a proposal to discuss it in the light of what we just talked about, here they shine on this general level, so to speak, but on the bologna education. well, literally the next day. i read this reaction of the press secretary, deputy head of the presidential administration, mr. dmitry peskov, this is his reaction to the conversation that happened at that meeting, we read. i think that it was rather the initiative of one of the leaders of our military-historical society, and it has nothing to do with the official

position, probably, this is how it should be treated. i have a question. what does it mean? and this is a private opinion of a particular person and this is not is shared, the official position, that they are shared by the official position. the possibility of an attempt to teach children to that way the symbols of the country in which they live. what do you mean it's not officially supported? why then can’t i conclude that since in an american paid school in a provincial small town, where tuition was paid with quite a lot of money, the children in the morning, as skabeev says, sang the anthem there, they swore in the american flag and it was legal, we that not

we see the results of the absence of this attention of the official position to what is happening and has already happened in a lot. listen. this is the eighth patriotism. this is not a cliché that i want to understand, but i want to understand, that is, this cannot be done, but in an american school it is possible in our country and this is not just a private opinion. this is a position that citizens identify with the position of the kremlin. for example, mr. peskov answering a belarusian television journalist about cultural figures who have left the country and fled the country. here to speak following. we have people who are afraid. that's when it all started they got

scared. uh, one of them left they will say. i'm going on an extended vacation. someone else did something and everyone acted differently, but there are those who got scared. and who did not understand. and they are not enemies of the state. i'm convinced that we also have such hawks, you know, who believe that everything is necessary for everyone, everything is right on the nail, there and so on, and many did not understand. many were afraid, you know, if you are a singer and so on? you don't understand nothing in politics. yeah, if you're a singer, you don't have to . you have to sing well. you shouldn't understand about nato expansion yes, there are those people who not only didn't understand, they just got scared, but who began to blame the authorities hmm who began to attack our military heroes. these are the enemies of the state and we will fight them. well, of course, i agree that the singer should sing, the artist should play, the artist should paint pictures, it is absolutely not necessary for them to

understand the intricacies of nato's advance to the east, but i was interested in the word frightened what were you afraid of? bombing moscow in the forty-first year, people who were evacuated from moscow, they were evacuated, because the advanced units of the german wehrmacht were stationed 30 km from moscow and they were leaving to the east there, kazakhstan, central asia zaural and what were these our compatriots afraid of when they left for the west? i would have said right in the match, they were afraid that they would close their accounts, that they could deprive them

of real estate. how did we understand this is accepted in a free society, where private property is valued as a shrine? that's nothing frightened, and the confirmation of this is very simple. remember, we talked in one of our previous programs about how mrs. sobchak supported the initiative in the financier mr. movchan that the authorities of the government of the united states of great britain did not impose sanctions on the opposition, that is, on the rest - this is but on the position than their own , well, in fairness, i must say that ms. sobchak manages, and in this difficult situation for her, to monetize her channel and hang out, probably, such an announcement that the cost of advertising on her channel costs 600,000 rubles.

in general, for the purity of the genre, i would suggest sobchak not take 660,000, but take 666,000. well, to support mr. morgenstern and your ideas about what is good. and what is bad, but what fluorite is another defender of the fatherland known to everyone. e, mr. marat gelman that's what he writes. i understand that any russian makes you feel bad, and there is every reason for this. i agree that castle culture is inevitable, that is, the abolition of culture, well russian means, and while the war is going on, it is not right to say, no, not only to russian politicians to russian money, but also to russian culture. and here is how he

echoes, mr. andrey makarevich to the peasant nugelman. i see yapping about the scarlet maxim chulpan zemfira who left, this is russia who left you asshole, because they are russia, not you. damn, well , well, well, that's just you. just imagine what self-conceit about yourself. it was russia that left us , i will not repeat this word. they didn't leave out of fear. that they will close the accounts, and this is herself russia left? rachmaninov bunin ilyin shmelev chaliapin yes, and now the whole minister of culture and

national heritage of poland, pan piotr glinsky, on april 4 announced the following from the public space, russian culture should disappear. we appreciate the achievement of this culture in music or literature. they are at the highest level, but we are dealing with a country that has gone mad. he pointed out that now is not the time for russian ballet, not the season for productions based on chekhov or pushkin, and also the performances of the alexandrov ensemble, not the time. and for what culture, according to mr. glinsky , is the time today? in general, what will the world be left without russian culture? and with this i want. remind you of the words from the gospel of john that's what the savior says, my time has not yet come. and for you

there is always time, what this means, there are many interpretations. uh, this phrase of salvation, but today understanding these words i personally do not deserve this. what a savior can give you is not what you deserve. russian culture great russian culture that's what they deserve? and you deserve it what do you have now that, in principle, is opposed to what the savior taught?