i consider the assault on industrial zones inexpedient. i order to cancel this case when we have to think about saving the life and health of our soldiers and officers; people do not need to climb into the catacombs and crawl underground along these industrial ones. block this industrial zone with an object so that a fly does not fly by, there is a accomplishment of combat work to liberate mariupol of this success. congratulations, please pass on the words of gratitude to the troops. i want them to know everything in our understanding. they are all heroes in the understanding of all of russia mariupol in recent years has been turned into a well- fortified anti-russian military base. but there was no time. this is one of the largest industrial centers of russia and one had to be a deaf or absolutely irresponsible and cynical politician in order not to hear direct hints from moscow, yes, russia

recognized the independence of ukraine 30 years ago but did not allow its historical territory to turn into anti-russia. your baggage a huge amount of russian lands of traditional russian historical territories and then only decided to withdraw from this union well, at least then it came out with what with what came. and i would not drag with you gifts from the russian people. we will never agree with only one thing, that someone would allow himself to use russia's generous gifts to harm the russian federation itself. i hope this will be heard. you love russia .

i would have ukraine and it has always been i felt that this is russia so you think that our cause is right for us to russia here we are russians this is a big mistake stay alive for a long time. this will never be russian territory, if you feel that way, i think that this person should understand that for the sake of his children and grandchildren, you already need to go to look for a place in russia, it’s right zelensky came to power on promises to unite the country. as a result, he tore it to pieces shamelessly deceive their voters unscrew the real politics in a completely different direction in june zelensky came up with a law on indigenous peoples, according to which only the russian people announced not indigenous. this is definitely completely reminiscent of the mass theory and practice of nazi germany . how to be mixed with people, as if in fact a

jew by nationality, i don’t know if he has mixed blood, what should i do? here with these people. and that now, as in nazi germany, they will measure their skulls and other parts of the body with a compass and determine, how they determined real flights and fake ones. the russian people as a whole. and, of course, it cannot be indifferent. this is absolutely unacceptable and does not comply with any norms of international humanitarian law. maybe you know something about some kind of reaction of international organizations, so there is no question about the osce, i do not know anything about it. and it seems to me that there will be no reaction, because ukraine creates as an antipode to russia, therefore russian people prefer to ignore anything on the territory of historical russia and are declared aliens. here's what's happening at this is generally just smarter comprehensible, you understand hmm from time immemorial.

russian people lived here. now they're announcing there the us should step up its presence in ukraine i'm very glad we had this very bright high level meeting us we've been looking forward to just as much looking forward to it. in june, after another telephone conversation with biden, zelensky told the world that the united states promised to quickly accept ukraine into nato in washington, then immediately refuted. how do we know this. or maybe they just they said, you know, you got out early. it's too early to talk about it and it's out of place. you got out that you are preventing us from spoiling the situation for us by being silent, could not, perhaps for several days, but in fact can imagine that the plan for ukraine's entry into nato is being discussed and we must keep this in mind, this, of course, depends on whether it meets the criteria at the same time we will do everything to put ukraine in a position to resist russian physical aggression. imagine that ukraine becomes

a member, the flight time from the central part of russia to moscow will be reduced to 70 minutes. it's red for us or not, but someone should think about it at all . think about how we should. there is a response to what is essentially being proposed and discussed, in addition to the fact that zelensky declares that it is necessary to join nato immediately, with these words, he also says that supposedly the ukrainians themselves really want to join nato well, this is not how at least 50% of the inhabitants of ukraine do not want nato countries to join, and smart people understand this that they don't want to be on the line. fire they don't want to be bargaining chips and cannon fodder, among other things. uh, these people feel they are part of our civilization and don't want one part of this civilization to oppose another part of civilization. and at the same time, smart people performed some kind of dance under a stranger. putin makes these statements

just a few days before his first meeting with biden, thereby clearly making it clear to the united states and the kiev regime that they should not play with fire. we are on our way to such an important visit meeting of the presidents russia and the usa we are located just a few centimeters from the office at an altitude of 11,000 m in geneva, the journalists' excitement, which is understandable, but the beginning of such a most serious conversation for the fate of the whole world is smeared with bacchanalia, which was arranged at the entrance to the hall by the american side. the order of the journalists of

the country can not behave more correctly. it must be admitted that it was difficult to start the conversation. as a result, after the meeting, i outlined at least some positive for you. the ambassadors of the two countries returned to their jobs, but it was felt about ukraine's membership in nato the positions of moscow and washington are tough here, perhaps, there is nothing to discuss, and although it was about vital national interests about a direct threat to the security of russia, the entire western world began to accuse moscow even more of aggressiveness and unpredictability of the exit of the united states in 2002 . contracts about absolutely unpredictable things. why was it necessary to do this, destroying the basis of international stability in the sphere of strategic security, and then withdrawing from the treaty on intermediate and shorter-range missiles. what is here there was no stable exit from the treaty in the open, that there was almost nothing stable left. and what is stable in that they supported the

coup d'état in ukraine when the former president yanukovych agreed with all the demands of the opposition, he was ready, in fact, to leave power, and in three months there to announce new elections. no , it was necessary to carry out a bloody coup d'état, which led to well-known consequences. and you think we're acting unpredictable. no, i don't think so, in my opinion. we see ourselves absolutely adequately, the threat that arises for us. we need to agree on rules of conduct. it is necessary to negotiate over and over again, putin repeats, but literally a few days after that meeting, the british esme. trying to break through the crimea, this, of course, is a provocation, firstly, it was complex and was carried out not only by the british, but also by the americans, even if we sank this ship, it would still be difficult to imagine that the world is a flask on the guarantee of a third world war, because those who do it know they can't

emerge victorious from this time. these are very important things, i don’t think that we would be happy about that, but the development of events, but at least we know what we are fighting for, we are fighting for ourselves on our territory for our future. then putin makes another statement, which is impossible not to pay attention. i am concerned about the beginning of the military development of ukrainian territory, which creates significant problems for us. in the field of security. this concerns the vital interests of the russian federation and the people of russia. this is cause for concern. and that's about this is what we should think the russian president writes an article about the historical unity of russians and ukrainians, where russia again declares he will not allow ukraine to turn into anti-russia. but how exactly to prevent this. unfortunately. i don't know yet the answer to this question. we want to build soviet relations with ukraine, but how can we

build relations with today's leadership, given what they are doing, but it is almost impossible, but we are ready to work with those forces that would like to build relations with russia what happens to these forces outside of judicial reprisals, sanctions against their citizens, which contradicts the legal constitution of ukraine, or just murder on the street; no one is looking for murderers ; after all, people are even afraid to answer questions sociologically afraid, because a small group of people who appropriated the lavra of the winners in the struggle for independence. these are people of extreme political views, they are in fact deed. and they lead ukraine, regardless of what the name of the head of state is such a dead end.

i still don’t really understand how to get out of it, and while in russia they are analyzing and reflecting on the proposal , ukrainian president zelensky easily publicly talks about the possibility of a big war. we can. i think that there may be potential in this topic, but after that there will never be good-neighborly relations between russia and ukraine and belarus . delivered. under someone else's control under complete external control, key issues are not decided in kiev, but in washington, partly in berlin in paris, the ukrainian side at official talks to the press, says one thing, but inside the country it actually says something else. i want to emphasize this enough to look at the statements of the first persons of the state, in fact, they say that they are not going to implement the minsk agreements. yes, that is, minsk is dead and all the peoples. yes, he was born barely alive, what was in 2015, it was born, barely alive

open another bandage. what they say they will comply with, they say that this will destroy their country to the current president. he recently stated that i do not like one point from these minsk agreements. well, like it or not like it, be patient, my beauty. it should not be done differently, but the neglect of the minsk agreements, under which ukraine itself signed, was demonstrative and defiant on the face of president zelensky when he was called to peace by the special status of donbass on an ongoing basis. necessary, of course, to extend the term of the agreement on the special status of certain regions of donbass and, ultimately , to make this norm permanent, as provided for in the minsk agreements, macron merkel and then the salt from it all, as if they did not notice, but they criticized moscow over and over again for

non-fulfillment of the minsk agreements clearly at the same time, knowing in the document. there is not a single word at all about the fact that moscow must fulfill something, there is only about the donbass and ukraine, but when we ask our partners a question, including in norman format. and what exactly does russia not fulfill in your place and what, in your opinion, according to the minsk agreements? russia should have made the answer no, they cannot formulate it directly. i'm not kidding. that's exactly the kind of thing. and what exactly does not work. uh, lnr, according to low agreements, too, they cannot formulate, but nevertheless from us. will the execution of the opinion of russia in the literal sense of the word pass by the ears. energy comments 8 years europe seems not to notice the use of heavy weapons in the donbass

order from zelensky and poroshenko, they started it. now the incumbent president is cheerfully reporting that they are using bayraktars, that is, unmanned aerial vehicles. what is strictly prohibited in the minsk agreements and subsequent agreements, but they don’t even react to it here, but in the usa they practically supported it, and officials in ukraine directly say they used it and will continue to apply it in parallel with this organized. they are plans in the exercise in black unplanned. here. i want this to emphasize the unplanned exercises in the black sea actor, it seems that we are not allowed to relax. well, let them know that we are not relaxing. this generally goes beyond certain limits at a distance of 20 km from our state border. that is, strategic bombers, and not as you know. they will inflict very serious weapons . and now you know, uh, the us ship entered the black sea, we can look at it through binoculars or through the sight of the corresponding defense systems.

us hotels have even stopped hiding that ukraine's entry into nato is being seriously considered . he came to the minister of defense, who essentially opens the door to nato ukraine, yes. each side has the right to choose. and, of course, it worries us. tomorrow a rocket will appear near kharkov. what are we to do with this. well, it's not we who climb there with our missiles, they put them under our noses, of course, this is a problem, of course, a problem. why was it necessary to expand nato to our borders. well , why anyone can answer this question with a sensible answer no, there is not, we had almost. uh, ideological picture of relationships. we were almost allies. no, to all our persuasions and requests. do not do that. what happened is what we are seeing now sergey vetchina, we need to ask the question of seeking to provide russia with serious long-term guarantees to ensure our

security in this area, because it’s just to exist and constantly think about what could happen there tomorrow russia cannot moreover, for the first time in the history of modern diplomacy, russia makes public documents with its security initiatives. yes, this may not be the usual way to conduct a discussion, but we have the fear that any of our proposals will be used to fill his destructive work. e creations for their growth in our neighboring countries on their territory. uh will talk endlessly endlessly about the need for negotiation to do nothing but pump up, uh, a neighboring country with modern weapons systems and build up threats to the russian with which we must do something, he must live somehow, so our proposal is open and understandable, and so at seven o'clock in the evening in moscow at eleven o'clock in the morning in

washington, the president of russia is heading to a historic summit, which we are now riveted to the attention of the whole world, of course, are following. behind this event is a new attempt to convey to washington its concern about what is happening. greetings , mr. president. we proceed from the premise that our concerns, at least this time, will be heard, although so far during the previous decades. we constantly talked about our concerns and asked not to do it, but infrastructure nonetheless. nato was inevitably approaching our borders. and now we see, e, complexes e against barona missiles with mk-41 in poland and romania, and we have every reason to believe that the same thing will happen if ukraine is admitted to nato. well

, how can we not think about it. it would be simply criminal inaction on our part to watch involuntarily that there is a further movement to the east is unacceptable, but what is incomprehensible here not a single inch to the east, we were told in the nineties. well, why did they cheat , they just brazenly deceived five waves, she tells us about nato expansion, and where is it written on a piece of paper ? well, that's all. go away, what are you talking about? well, you understand, in the end, we are not a threat to someone, or something , we came there to the borders of the united states. the united states came to our house with their missiles, but the threshold of our house is already here. and now they are still saying, no, now we will have ukraine, which means that there will be systems there too. well, here's what we're talking about. and you demand some kind of guarantee from me. you must give guarantees, and you have probably

never heard such harsh words right now that you can’t reach it any other way, what is called, well, i was talking about red lines, which we believe cannot be crossed. i want it to be clear to everyone, both here and abroad by our partners, so that it is clear that the matter is not even in the line that we do not want anyone to embark on. the fact is that we have nowhere to go. they are us pinned to such a line. sorry for the bad manners, that we have nowhere to move further, but i already said to put missile systems 4-5 minutes of flying time to moscow, but where should we move now? they just brought us to such a state that we have to tell them. stop nato the process of nato expansion will not compromise russia on the situation with the entry of ukraine and georgia into the alliance. what is happening now, the tensions that are developing in europe. this is their fault. at every step. russia was forced to somehow respond to each

step by step, the situation constantly worsened and worsened worsened degraded and degraded. here. today we are in a situation where we have to decide something. well, it's not clear, is it? should it be there? it is clear we are 30 years old, we are already trying to persuade not to do one second third, just a complete disregard of our concerns about the requirements of the proposals. they are already on the threshold of our house. you said, and if they do not hear now and this time, you gave us to understand that a military-technical response will follow. what can he be can be very different. it depends on what offers our military experts make to me, but uh, i hope to reach a diplomatic negotiation. this is fixed, as i said legally. hmm, within the framework of the documents that we proposed, we will strive precisely for this, which since russia then declared its desire to negotiate in response to ignoring. well, just on all the key

issues on none of these items, not just no position or even no answers, or yes, the impression that we did not even raise these questions them. we just went around, we see, there are political clichés and proposals on some minor issues, but if everyone wants peace, tranquility in well-being trust well, what's wrong with not placing shock systems near our edges , someone can answer what's wrong here, please, we'll create conditions for increasing confidence and security. well, what's wrong here? i don't want to take any red lines all attempts at zeros. zero to be honest. well, to be honest, even surprised, but not a millimeter moved on not a single issue in february , one after another, torban macron scholz comes to the russian president on putin’s speeches. clearly , the situation has reached its limit, and in the doctrinal documents of ukraine it is written that a russia is

an adversary and b it is possible to return the crimea by military means. imagine that ukraine is a nato member, which means there will be a confrontation between russia and why should we fight nato well, i want to ask you, is there the second part of this question, do you want to fight with russia? users of internet resources. you want france to fight russia but that's how it will be european countries will automatically be drawn into a military conflict with russia there will be no winners and you will find yourself drawn into this conflict against your will. you don't even have time to blink an eye from nato they say what entry is like in the coming years. it’s just unrealistic, so saying, well, you and i must understand what they say between state relations, they say, as you said, it won’t tomorrow. and when is the day after tomorrow and what does this

change for us in the historical perspective, absolutely? we hear nothing that ukraine is not ready today to join nato, we know it is you and they immediately say that it will not be accepted tomorrow, when it is prepared for this. but for us it may be too late, so we want to resolve this issue now. well, then europe, the united states and ukraine, either do not fully realize that the situation is so serious, or purposefully and they are warming it up, russia is accused of preparing for a war in europe for the first time in 80 years, forgetting that they themselves supported the war against yugoslavia, yugoslavia, they bombed on the pretext that sanctions with this security, or something, where the united states destroyed the country, but who gave the right to strike at the european capital, just decided, but with they ran after them with this elite, and under what pretext they entered the cancer, and

then it turned out that they were mistaken, then they said intelligence let us down. wow, they destroyed the country with intelligence to do. everything, it turns out, there was no oil of destruction weapon there, and in syria when they come in and do what they want. but what are they doing now on the territory of ukraine or are they trying to do? this is on the threshold of our house, and they must understand that we simply have nowhere to retreat further, they will arm and push extremists from a neighboring state against russia, including certain regions of the russian federation, well, let's say they go to crimea what do they think we do not see these threats or think that we will limply look at the threat created for russia with the constant pumping of modern weapons with brainwashing of the population and can you imagine how, in a historical perspective, russia should live on, live on all the time with a spy on what will happen there and when they will fuck it up is a serious question. salt, who first met putin arranges a public five meeting, stressed

that a slightly different situation reigned in yugoslavia. there was danger and threat of genocide. we only allowed ourselves to add that, according to our estimates, what is happening in the donbass today is diplomatic genocide. canon is already one this scene is a powerful signal of the most acute disagreements and try to smooth the situation, but no. a few days later, the german, scholz publicly still laughs at the genocide against russians. when he says that a genocide is taking place somewhere in the donbass - it's just ridiculous, but in parallel, ukraine continued to be pumped with more and more serious weapons and the country's military planes landed one after another, the shelling of donbass became more and more intense, there were more and more dead and wounded zelensky publicly and has repeatedly stated that crimea will never be a russian quote. when it becomes finally. it is clear that no one is going to resolve the issue of donbass peacefully, but, on the contrary, is preparing for the war of russia, turning the page

of the eight-year non-implementation of the minsk agreements by kiev. you wanted good evening again, this is the recognition of the dpr of the lpr. what are its limits? we have recognized them. and that means we recognized all of them. mental documents, including the constitution and the constitution spelled out the borders within the donetsk and luhansk regions at the time when they were part of ukraine zelensky had managed to threaten to restart the nuclear program. we understand that these words were addressed primarily to us and i want to say that we heard them even when tactical nuclear weapons appeared. in ukraine, it means a strategic threat to us. moscow will be in the affected area. for us, this is a strategic threat. we took it that way, and we, of course, should and will take it in the most serious way. february 24 has come in russia. pavel, of course,

additional information appears when he suddenly hides, that france was supplying diplomatic mail ammunition for ukraine when it turned out that despite the assurances? first, schulz from before to angela merkel, whom we treated with respect, at least with some respect that e germany e guarantor of the minsk agreements war. and as vladimir vladimirovich correctly said , it was written in the doctrinal documents of ukraine, that they have been waging a de facto war with russia for eight years. so, it is unlikely that we had

any other choice but to stop the special military operation of the eight-year war. which was unleashed by the ukrainian nazi authorities after the coup in kiev, tragic pages, of course, in european and world history, but alas, sooner or later, supporters of nazism will have to answer for this .a person aged from 5 to 90 years tens of thousands winners entered universities hundreds received serious appointments the best russian companies in 4 years the platform became a forge of personnel and new ideas, important

initiatives were voiced in this world in the catherine’s hall of the kremlin by each of the participants of this meeting. an example of the fact that russia is a country of opportunities, but in the current situation, of course, there are opportunities for self-realization. if desired, it can become even more. after these words, at the same time, from all sides, a movement began in the direction of putin, nothing to anyone, move away, please, instruct other events, but a lot of people from different courts wanted to speak , but every example of the fact that russia is powerful, huge and beautiful, it is beautiful thanks to such people. how do you russia country opportunity in the

current environment. it means that everyone behind him will be examples of a jacket, then she showed both putin and the whole country live, if someone leaves our market, then certainly this whole place is never empty. and i would like it more that domestic manufacturers and designers in clothes of their own production was convenient to hide and reminders that do not forget to tell putin, others repeated and repeated. or at eight it became 5:30 so i walked around 10 times, yes, because i still lay down, but then they even had the opportunity to walk in circles even in the kremlin, a personal tour, which is difficult to imagine, but russia is a country of opportunities.