on something speak with representatives of the media with representatives of politics for them the topic does not exist. here they have one definite line. rammstein today is really the most important indicator, that is, for germany today the most important indicator of where germany is located, if it was said that 35-40.000 american jais who are on the territory of germany were very undesirable, then today it suddenly turns out that rammstein shows guys yes, actually, but what is it, but before that it was artillery brigade and now they are talking about an airborne battalion. e regiment eighty- second so-called, if anyone does not know during the second world war, there was such an eighty- second airborne battalion. e united states of america which then we told this story, which then with general poton. uh, they then tried to use the remaining units for a possible war against the soviet union, this unit exists as a phenomenal anti-seed absolutely yes absolutely. this is the most famous

its history must be understood. and finally, a very important point is the recipe for cabbage soup, now we’ll get to the recipe for cabbage soup, why i ask the question, and it’s not at all random because it was necessary to conduct exercises on its borders. uh, playing one of the combinations that the wrong side will suddenly regard the signals coming from this country and a conflict can be provoked, in addition to the will, which will lead to war, because we may well be wrong there, for example, and regard the concentration of troops on the border with belarus or the entry of some formation into the territory of ukraine or an attempt to enter there, let's say, yes, into our territory. yet it can be. right now there, for example, the british sasovtsy, all of a sudden for which there is yes in ukraine there is a tourist operation. suddenly they somehow find themselves on the territory of the belgorod province. after that,

just a blow to london. and what do we like? what kind of uniform they will not hit on the passport, hit on the face, we don’t give a damn about any form of any cover documents if we we understand that this is a sas unit operating under cover with documents, then for us it is britain that declared war on us. well, let's go ok. well, now we are buying ukrainian uniforms, changing clothes for dzerzhinsky's division and going to berlin. yes, and we say, this is not our format, ukrainian article. now, i knew he'd like it about cabbage soup too. well , cabbage soup is very simple. well, here margarita is much stronger than me, but i still have to say this recipe to some owl, which is like a kulin, oh, some mouths are baked from the outside, just yes, well, so i'll tell you about the soup that does not cause appetite three potatoes. they half-boil there and rush half. uh, i cut off a head of cabbage, but half a head of cabbage, which is also

slightly boiled, when it's all ready, one carrot, one onion goes there. and when it's all almost boiled down, well, there's a little salt and pepper there, a trash can or a white bavarian sausage, such that throws great soup. a-la, something is added to the city. yes, yes no, it's just that it's terrible, that is, but but i like this german pronunciation of the potato, you can immediately see that some kind of ladies-in-waiting of the imperial court. yes, malik well, jokes aside, but in fact, everything is not fun, because the minister of defense said that yes, they are not against ukraine joining nato at all. that is, they really want to bury ukraine, solve any state. yes and blinkin said at the same time. no , we cannot decide for the ukrainian people. if they want to become neutral to agree among themselves. yes, it was actually very interesting. wording. uh, mr. austin when he said that uh, any talk now on the topic here

means future membership. uh, ukraine in nato - this means speculation, which a wild water means propaganda for russia, so do not talk about it anymore, answering all questions. but yes. we are ready, in principle, to observe all this in the future. but in principle, i think that in itself, uh, this is an event that took place at the ramstein airbase , but, well, it says that, of course, nato perceives very, very painfully what is happening at ukraine for this is an extraordinary timer. it even actually, despite the fact that it took place, as if within the framework of nato, this is not just such a regular stage, which i will constantly remind you, they will have a big one in june. well, i understand that there is an understanding, because until june. in general, already ukrainian flights can be resolved quite deplorably. in general, for here it is conditionally nato, the usa and so on, therefore, we decided to do something such a hasty event in advance. eh, at the same time. what is probably the most interesting thing? yes, if he let's look at the summary of the speech, and mr. defense is on the united states of america, it is clear that he says a lot about the fact that we need to

weaken russia, we need to reduce the military potential of russia and so on, so it will be such a long-term victory, yes, but this is a very interesting wording. yes, because in many ways there is no talk of the fact that we will win there in some specific battles. yes, there is betta near the donbass, for example, or we will win there, i don’t know in the battle for mariupol and so on we are talking about such abstract things that can really be virtually imagined in the media as some kind of long-term victory, because here we have weakened the military potential there, the bones will gain that the potential has already, in principle, been weakened, because russia, yes, yes, this is victory because russia has already spent a certain number of its missiles lost. yes, a certain amount of their equipment soldiers and so on, so the potential is already weaker than it was before the start of the ukrainian crisis, so for us, this is already possible with victoria morally victory, we won to some extent. uh. i think that, of course, this probably says a lot about how the attitude towards what is happening there in the framework of the ukrainian crisis is changing. yes, and no less important than here again, well, relatively routine, but nevertheless important

decisions, but on the provision of heavy weapons to ukraine front, therefore, well, in general, uh, there are attempts to explain, then, uh, how will it end the ukrainian crisis in such a way that it certainly does not end with serious negative consequences for the british authorities, for example, for the american authorities. well, if you can’t win at the front, you have to win these media political technology wars that we are now seeing, and for linkin, of course, this speech, connected with russia’s weapons and so on, cannot but cause a smile, but because if we put aside there, yes, beyond the brackets any of his comments it becomes obvious that, of course, americans are very welcome. on our military potential, if this were not the case, then they would not hastily conclude, and conclude, but a new hypersonic alliance between the countries of the anglosphere, the united states of america itself, because well, it’s obvious that this is, as it were, the answer. that's it for the use, and russian hypersonic missiles in ukraine, so here, on the one hand, we

see, yes, real actions. they say there is definitely anxiety on the other side. we see, of course, some beautiful picture, who tries to show blinkin. although at the same time he fails to sell american weapons and reduce there, for example, russia's share in the weapons expert is not in india where he went, and not in the countries of the middle east and, in principle, nowhere outside, probably, the western world, which they like since they place great hopes on what is possible, but to eliminate the old weapons on the territory of ukraine from the seventies and the sixties and then supply, respectively, for big money to european countries, a brand new american weapons to earn good money on this, which i think that the american military-industrial complex has already tuned in to receive and you need to earn money literally not so long ago, statistics came that this year, for example, one of the cereals. american corporations are fleeting martin is planning to get government contracts, oh from the americans from their government from the europeans and so on for amounts under 100 billion dollars, that is, you need to understand, this is more than the entire military budget of russia at the moment it is, well, where- then there is the military budget. no no. no, this is for 1 year

actually for 1 year and it's only one big corporation. well, one of the largest, of course, just produces f35. that is a lot of money. well, of course, they will earn on this, and their own geshefts. well, in general, such a situation, by the way, what did you want to add about, again, some contradictions yes, related to comments on how this current ukrainian crisis will proceed, but nevertheless, here are the comments, mr. emilia the writer, he has a committee chiefs of staff, and they say, it’s about the military component, yes, or what well, tactical assessments that the situation at the front is really already in the coming weeks. uh, he will speak very, very badly for the ukrainian side, but on the other hand. uh, definitely boris johnson's comment or comment. a multi-year conflict, they relate. this here is some kind of conditional big geopolitical confrontation that has continued like this, and it will somehow intensify in the future. eh, also, as it were, in the context of his statements about there, the reduction of the military potential of russia also looks like such very abstract things, but

as i understand it, they are roughly preparing for this. but by the way, what a very interesting attempt. immediately at this meeting , to draw a certain red line, they said that we don’t need a nuclear conflict, so you perceive it this way, and the russians that these supplies are here - it’s just , as it were, part of our conventional, i don’t i know where the political war is, but not the nuclear conflict nuclear conflicts. we want to avoid. so i think that of course, here was a reference to its internal consumer to the audience in the usa in europe , which needs to be reassured a little, but certainly. i think that there was, of course, also a desire to somehow appeal to russia and to show that, well, you see, no matter how we are holding back, if we are somehow not ready to go into a nuclear conflict now, then you, please, are also holding back. it looks, of course, it's funny not our style, while we feel sorry for the hole, until we decided to leave the sanctions list. now advertising after that we do not wait for our studio director of the information and press department of the russian foreign ministry moril vladimirovna zakharova i have already been told that the shooters do

not live long with you and will kill me. i’m lucky 1941 wings on berlin in the cinema since april 28, you are so active, you even do exercises. and i can’t even sit down once pain in my knees yellow package available package from 149 rubles. vtb, which will help you get a free vtb multicard, right in front of you, it’s easy to pay a refund of up to twenty percent and everything will work out. tell him you don't love him. well say, the first oscar is already in the cinema, when acute pain

makes you climb on the wall, the staff of a large red package rushes to your aid, the staff is charged against pain. no moms, not like that, who doesn't do that anymore. i have to look. look like this mom, try tasty. mom, do everything, please. and it tastes so good to me. a loan of three dozen without bank insurance for any product to work out i am gennady malakhov every evening yesterday and knees

gel from the sbermarket meter. order. at the most interesting place, when i tell them about how i feel, they listen, but they do not hear. this is bad. no one can rewrite our history. this is just one of the folders prepared by the soviet prosecution for the nuremberg international military tribunal . no one will close the border for us always together always online. the internet is so strong. wow, it won't break in the cold, we are watching the masterpieces of the world documentary classics, new items

, exclusives. watch for free without registration application or website program 60 minutes. we have a special issue, we start with urgent news, every news matters, we know what we are striving for. we understand our purpose. it is very important how our multinational country united in the fight against nazism. every fact has confirmation. we are now dealing with an extremely vile deceitful enemy in the information sphere. we are engaged in information demining. it is impossible to skip the negotiations and it is necessary to negotiate not from europe with the united states. they spent superb operation by setting a mousetrap against the

bears. they figured it happens even to smart people. 60 minutes do not miss tomorrow at 11:30 and 17:30 on the russia channel a flying head, and kolobok is unusual.

only on the channel, russia daily reports on the preparation of a provocation in ukraine to discredit the russian armed forces. the united states is doing everything that blames us for using weapons of mass destruction with the help of kiev dispersed fakes about attacks on ukrainian nuclear facilities were sabotage at chemical enterprises responsible for which was also immediately attributed to russia, without any trial, how far it was ready to go. the west will ask the director of the information department with seals from russia, the extremely authorized ambassador, vladimir, on zakharova maria vladimirovna answer. let's go as far

as we can. so, if you do not stop, but go to the end, the end is obvious for them - this is a program that they wrote for themselves. world domination over all complete control over any state of any political force of any personalities, which one way or another has at least some kind of influence. it doesn't matter where this is their vision of where they should strive. this program is such a beautiful expression, a in english. you probably know him sky from yes, relatively speaking, there are no limits there are no restrictions everything you want everything, perhaps it is used in a good way, when a person should not feel constrained when he is in some in a creative one. e flight, when he is ready to go to great lengths for the sake of noble goals, only the goals should be noble and this

expression has a different negative understanding, when everything is permitted and in russian it is called permissiveness. you are beautiful. a capacious and understandable word is their program. maximum. it is also a minimum. it is, in principle, the goal of all existence is absolute permissiveness. and they proclaimed this to the rank of their global agenda. therefore, if they don’t stop, if they don’t show red lines and if they do n’t defend their national state red lines. these are the barriers beyond which go over. permissiveness will prevail. well, the british decided that it was possible for them to supply weapons to ukraine, with the help of which they consider it justified to strike. deep into the territory of the russian federation, this is a monstrous statement that the

deputy defense of britain allowed himself to make today. but just like they set the course and set the agenda for everyone else, other nato member countries of the european union are pulling up to them. it seems to me that we should just say brussels and so it is clear that speech is about some such united conglomerate. it seems to me that they, as if having a snack on the case. they are just jealous of who will supply the most weapons and all the things that can be used to kill ukraine and at the same time they say that they are for peace and for the need to end hostilities. it doesn't work out illogical. i would say contradictory. slezamir, it is necessary to stimulate negotiations, not the supply of weapons. and the fact that with the cauldron today the deputy, and the head of the defense department of britain, everything comes, in principle, limits are conceivable,

boundaries, logics, politics, and so on and so forth, but on the other hand, it reveals the true message that they are guided by, it is very interesting to watch their performances to analyze. and then look. you don't. remind me and the audience. not because you don't follow the agenda. you are in it completely, but simply, because there are no such statements from the white house. i don't know, to the apartments of nato brussels of the same european parliament, by the way, speaking, which would be called to stimulate the negotiation processes , you can absolutely remind me of something. where is it the doves of the world are hiding in some kind of attics , they sat down. yes, because something else was on my mind and it was up to pumping weapons to the utmost of ukraine and then setting them on fire. they simply did not allow it to be done on the scale and to the extent that it was planned. they just intercepted this original plan, which

was that's all, if they were really for the world, in the first place, 8 years would not have been lost in vain. and secondly, now they would do everything possible, but about the influence that the states have on the kiev regime. well, it's probably not worth talking about everything and so they understand everything perfectly and see it every day , but the call for a negotiation process is stimulating. instead, exactly the opposite of even mr. barrel. by and large , they set it up, attributing to him, entering into his social networks in his account a phrase regarding the fact that the outcome should be decided on the battlefield. i hacked a baryle for a long time and not an account, and the fact is that, again , it is exposed. the very truth, which is not carefully hidden, if the head of european, european union diplomacy, professional diplomacy is not just a politician, but a diplomat,

who headed the foreign policy service of his country, and who is now responsible for the collective foreign policy of the eu countries, says that he is not at the negotiating table, that is, he does not use this phrase at all, but on the battlefield. it must be determined, so to speak, final and final. well then already sorry then, what else is needed as evidence of their aggressive attitude. well, this is the answer to your first initial question, where is their limit until what moment are they ready to go, where to stop, without stopping them, they will go further watched closely, but did not notice. maybe you can tell me if there was a statement by the relevant european structures or state departments regarding the disclosure of the actions of a sabotage group aimed at the destruction of russian journalists. yes, what are you talking about,

in my opinion, when it was, and even the suspicion of an attempt on any oppositionist. so the state department, already shouted 264 times in any performance they always welcomed. as a kind of creative beginning of self-expression, if it was directed to the journalists whom they they were classified as liberal, and many of them, then they turned out to be just agents, foreign influences, agents, and so on. filmed as a threat, as an immediate need to make an indictment . why? i know this because it's not only a who makes public statements. well, you are receiving a large number of requests from international structures, such as the ministry of foreign affairs and the press information department, with a request to clarify the circumstances that they caught in the information field related to a possible threat to this or that journalist and said that we

know for sure the curators from the american intelligence services who led from the headphones who made the decision to organize this terrorist group for international structures of death like that, because then they will bring this topic into their information field. it was not in vain that they cleaned him up, and the rashtude tv channel and the sputnik agency from other journalists. one way or another, getting rid of the russian presence. and what do you want? so that now this topic starts to be discussed, so that they ask a question. and who and why is threatening the representatives of the media, they will not be able to explain themselves then to say this is a notion writes the network post a cheap article for a jacket, which is generally shamefully small argument that leaves no stone unturned from such a position. two under the seventeenth year is not 2022, and not even 2021 2018, deputy

director of the information and press department. my colleague is going to new york at headquarters to participate in the work of the relevant structure of the committee on information, where he sets out the russian point of view on the events in the donbass, precisely from the informational media angle, and gives arguments, how, uh, in ukraine , journalists are killed, how are they, and are they tortured, how are they blackmailed? well, threats, facts pictures pictures, all this is brought by the ukrainian delegation, which for some reason consists of representatives of the ato in an apartment in new york. after the speech, they approach our representative diplomat, who there is a status and immunity and they begin to directly

threaten him, they approach him, then they don’t just come up, but practically start running around the headquarters, he threatens him directly saying that they have all the information on him personal data his personal data appear on the peacemaker website ask headquarters. he they are investigating apologizing saying that they do not know how these people are clearly behaving like extremists. there turned out to be a diplomat. that's the headquarters had this attitude, not because he is russian, but because he told the truth or information that differs from their point of view. direct threat. can? maybe now you will say that this is a notion, but this is not a notion. and no one can say that this is a moron, because we made this information public immediately. in the eighth year in 2018, and yesterday i reposted on the telegram channel a screenshot of my material from that

year, moreover, we have a correspondence with the secretary, who found all this dramaturgy on video cameras and wrote us the corresponding note, that’s all who will do this, maybe the osce, maybe the council of europe, then they can’t spy in the donbass in the interests of the ukrainians to recognize the entire previous chain of terrible stories that they haven’t dealt with for 8 years, and oles buzina and russian journalists, who were killed there, to whom they did not pay any attention, and then it will be necessary to draw attention to the story with the same, but mr. company that he was supposedly some kind of russian spy, only because then they began to guess that he allowed himself to hold a photo exhibition or somehow acquaint him with photographic materials about the situation in

donbass, he was expelled from poland, he was forbidden to enter, then it was about five years back. it happened. he became the main character of our media space only with a minus sign, because the liberal community did everything and in particular. unfortunately, alas, echo of moscow in order to discredit him and call him, supposedly some sort of kremlin spy agent who was engaged in subversive activities in poland. you know what turned out, but it’s the same, as always, the truth always comes out, it turned out that he , in combination, except for the ria novosti satellite, also worked as a freelance correspondent for ekho moskvy, so you can imagine everything that is now being said about what is not there were no plans, threats, and so on, shame and shame on those western journalists who did not even try to take comments from those people. and

those russian public figures of journalists, about whom we spoke yesterday, because then they would be you and margarita simonyan and many others, not tens or hundreds, but thousands of russian public figures from journalists, publicists and so on. they would cite specific facts of direct threats to life and health that we received. for not a month or two, but eight years. what is europe, first we are included in the sanctions lists? and then europe's pet places an order europe does not notice europe brought up absolutely europe gave the right to reprisal, if they violate all basic european principles, including, er, the sacred rights of private

property. no one can be convicted without a court order. you take a person out of life for them. it 's exactly the same, so they will still welcome the massacre of journalists. many people say first. this is not the first time in the history of europe that europe in the 20th century went through the same thing, with the same people. and for how how if the russian verb is such an attempt to stigmatize a person to hang a label only physical. this is soft, because the stigma, by the way, is traditional european. fun, it just got a different look and a different color in the 20th century. but she was for many years and she was applauded, and in this enlightened europe in the thirties and forties. it was the norm of europe going back to its nazi. there are a lot of things that shock me, and in the statements of the president of the united states of the current biden and a lot of things we comment on some

strange things that are not adequate, but there is something that struck me with a plus sign. you probably remember this speech, which was about six months ago, which was dedicated to, and in which president biden spoke about his feelings and the feelings that he brings up in his children and grandchildren regarding the concentration camps. uh, nazi, uh, who were, what he then said was an amazing thing he said. that he brings his children, and then grandchildren. on the territory of europe, it leads them to the gates of the concentration camp of the former nazi concentration camp, but only he shows them not the gate to the concentration camp, but shows the other side of the peaceful beautiful european houses that were located opposite.