anyone who does not pursue a hard-american policy. to protect the free flow of information to combat cybercrime, 60 countries at the head of the united states approved a declaration on the future of the internet, while shaking the thousandth cyber army of ukrainians is not perceived as a violation that was constantly engaged in deceiving russians. holders, bank cards and everything they did there. not this is different. this is different. at the same time, the same american retirees say, just don’t go crazy, you can’t let go of the internet from your hands. this means of manipulation the nation's right to self-determination is generally forgotten. now they are declaring what yes, they are saying, no-no-no donbass to return to ukraine and crimea to return to ukraine, but the opinion of the inhabitants is of concern to someone. but why in any case to return the territory? this is absolutely colonial logic, which they are not trying to accuse us, but de facto they carry it out. and of course, the peak is a brilliant

idea of ​​the americans. frozen property located in the territory or jurisdiction of the united states of america seize confiscate and transfer for the needs of ukraine, that is, and what happened to the right of private property sacred? and where are the courts that you decide? that is, this is the expropriation of the expropriators, or what? that is, you boys, that now the communists, that is, biden, is red saden remind him of the wonderful phrase that battle big dad dan red read in america that is, he is what the americans were ready to lose their lives before, but just not to become red, and now what do you allow yourself, you spit on all your basic values, you lined everyone up in a row, do not crush the step left step right shot, what is it this is a liberal democracy. and who is not a liberal democrat in prison

to expel from the unions to beat with sticks and the union in particular german journalists. to take away property without a court decision, but you give, but you just give and create a new ingenious architecture liberal in name, but under its essence of absolute dictatorship such a global nato but this is a full-length dystopia, but listen in particular to what a poorly educated woman says, moreover, what is most important is that this person is not secretary of defense, she is the secretary of foreign affairs, but listen to this speech. if putin succeeds, there will be new unfortunate suffering across europe, terrible consequences for the whole world, we will never feel safe again. so we must be ready for a long journey. we must double our support for ukraine and we must

bring unity to the end demonstrated in times of crisis my vision - this is a world where free nations are assertive and on the rise democracy's freedom is strengthened through the network economic partnerships and security partnerships are forced to take a better path. this is a long-term reward for the new army's security and prosperity. let's be honest, the architecture that was designed to ensure prosperity failed ukraine's security economy structures that were created after the second world cold war. so far have been deformed. they facilitated rather than deterred aggression russia is capable of blocking any effective action in the security council the g20 cannot function as an efficient

economic body. for now, russia remains at the negotiating table. now we need a new approach that combines hard security and economic security, which is worth stronger and more global alliances, where the free nation is more confident in itself, which recognizes that geopolitics is back. we will support ukraine, the war in ukraine is a general war. because the story of ukraine is a strategic imperative for all of us. heavy armament tanks with planes we go deep into our stocks we increase production. we need to do all of this. let 's keep moving forward faster to push russia out of all of ukraine. we should also learn from ukraine. the uk shipped weapons to

the ukrainian war long before the war even started . the world must do more to keep the invasion we will never make that mistake again. some argue that we shouldn't have brought in heavy weapons. stockpiling will provoke something worse inaction. would the biggest provocation now is the time for courage, not for caution. we must ensure that, along with ukraine in the western balkans, countries such as moldova, georgia, there will be a margin of safety of the opportunity to maintain their sovereignty . entered the war, that this statement that this is our war means that england has entered the war. that is, i understand correctly that now the uk becomes a legitimate target and finally, dmitry olegovich rogozin can

demonstrate all the capabilities of the sarmatian, it’s just that after this light interview of my dmitry olegovich on solovyov de sann he wrote that solovyov said that the sarmatian should test the sheet for this passionately. sorry for the pun calling vitali that is. well, i believe we are. here in the last days. this. uh, the rubicon is transferred to a situation where, uh, talk, including in this studio about how it happened? why did it happen already useless, that one could be indicate. our mistakes, including the mistakes of our foreign economic policy in relation to the same ukraine, and much more. uh, of course, the purposeful work of the west. but this, uh, everything is in the past to be analyzed there in some monographs, yes, now, and the question is posed point-blank by

this speech. uh, wonderful, who read it? well, besides the fact that it is clear that the herald of the western world is the power of attorney for them. they will be the most no, the most rigid doctrines and, uh, innovations in this sense in relation to russia, which of this will be implemented, and that's another question. it is clear that behind them are the americans who completely subjugated uh, subjugated europe, but uh, you need to listen. this is the future that the west is ready to notice, this is acquiring a new meaning, the famous expressions of the 19th century, the englishwoman is shitting. and now, on this occasion, i ’ll say, by the way, you don’t need any nonsense, like,

ah, barrels, you shouldn’t listen there. excuse me, this is it. yes, uh, muse. eh, what kind of drama is she ? forgot, huh? stoltenberg, here they will be talk means, uh, i do this thing. i just read it, but these are great words. eh, we are generally bad at this propaganda, con-propaganda, in general, we need to change our entire information policy and start from it. from this our program. yes, thanks for coming. we are completely propaganda now there will be a continuous commercial break, and then we will show you more coffee lyolis having fun running around the studio. so far this hasn't happened yet. no decision upstairs has been made, so let's continue. uh, so it's just light bulbs on top. need promptly to publish an anthology of russophobia, this is the speech.

it lays right there. this is the englishwoman garin, a whole series of texts from xix out of 20 from 19, and our russophobia is the most anti-sotism. it intersects, there in 90% of cases parallel to the anthology of lies. many works will be included both there and there. it's a lie, not a word. what is not an accusation of russia, it is directly written about the west about the united states of america anato, that's what they did. now everything is attributed to russia , well, such nonsense as arguments about democracy. e in ukraine, e former e, i don’t even have time. here fight decisive eh what is the look to do? you somehow reproach me there, huh? i'm not suggesting anything in particular. i decided today only to offer good? this means that the information

policy should be changed categorically to move from justification and from the stories of the hoary general secretary. he , uh, who after that go into this storm and walk around in these scenery and say that and if my granddaughters were here, horror, but uh, i feel sorry for the time uh of our president putin in this case, i understand that they work like that . well, enlightenment they hang me enlightenment of monkash people, that is, he should not be engaged in horse fodder. so we need to move on to tough accusations from the west, ah. all the crimes of western countries in the 20th and early 21st centuries should be succinctly listed, and brushed and distributed among the population of all countries where we can do the following regarding the same

england here. explain to me that the minister of national affairs is lying and slandering. well, something here and ignorance without words clearly calls for the destruction of russia in principle, of course. what, what is she makes? maintain diplomatic relations, uh, with the uk. that's what the fact that there are several oligarchs there is that the city of london was liked by the oligarchs, but now they complain that they have to cook for themselves, they have no money, and therefore they sweep the floors themselves. this is already their problem, that they deceived the west, for sure. there must be some. well, you can’t hear how people in official positions, including

foreign ministers, are constantly pouring slop on your country. well, they often appear there. official declaration of war on russia that's the speech. well, the announcement, what they say was not formally. she said the war in ukraine is ours. but yes, yes. well , okay. i'm ready this i uh, let this question, a looks or our security council will master. i don't mind. i don't mind this is the next one. that's all this economic policy of ours wonderful what they want to wag there, that means, uh. well, by the way, these are european values. really. well, the eyes are completely falling apart. here, people who valued this european culture really believed that that there is something much better than our responsibility when the germans. i vtyuhivayu here gazprom for gas, which they now received the

money stolen from gazprom well, i don't know what's in there from our respect for the german accuracy of honesty. when it will be 10% cheaper for us. and when we say, what are you talking about, well, whatever you want, so, economically, our relations are understandable, that everything cannot be torn apart. there, here it is, uh, what is the accusation of? here you want, everything will be blocked by self-isolation. yes, it can't. uh, let me remind you that putin, as he said, is impossible on the same cut russia out of the world economy, because we are part of the world economy. that's right on one side of europe. yes, but on the other side. we do not operate this economy according to our rules. oh, we must break out of it. they shove us. and we seem to resist. well, well, we got more than billions of dollars and euros now

for this gas. well, repost, they will cut it out in any case, it is clear that in the coming years, and it will not stop there, regardless of what happens on the territory of the former this very europe after this conflict to what? so spoke. eh, here i am, too, i'm not an economist. i e economists. i don't believe ours, but that's not the point. now ah the prosperity of europe i know clearly that it has already ended, that it cannot last. in the evening i understand everything. but as it turned out, everything is even simpler, it turns out, all the prosperity of the largest european states is not said to be based on cheap russian energy carriers about every little thing. that is, their cheap ones were confiscated and they had all the weapons. it may not be so in capitalism it's not about the ability to work, it's not about their creativity. you are not one of these very business talents,

but simply that they are given cheaply what is actually, well, expensive to sell. well, maybe, uh, stop, yes, selling is not something that is cheap, but in general it limits. they say, we are clean years, there in 2 years you will refuse russian energy carriers. and where is the statement of moscow a. we will stop in a year and a half. well, now, probably, you still need to, where do you quarantine e to collect this one, and you know a few dozen more in our market. there is only as much as you want buy. maybe i'm to the point that you need to move on to these actions. eh, the work is going seriously for a long time. well, i'll finish for a start. you are absolutely right in the first second sentence as well, but for this purpose we must formulate the goals of the task, if our goals and tasks are the same, you absolutely correctly say to integrate or our goal of the task is to rebuild the economy to rebuild within ourselves. this and has long been

said, no economy. i suggested in this studio in others a few years ago it is worth not waiting for the world system. they will lead to legal this is illegal our lawyers. they say it is impossible not practically not theoretically. they will lead to the solution of russia and permanently. the dangers they will not bring to this, they are clear that they will re-establish about that, that's when, when we alternative water, we will finally create initially. so i'm going to this, so we need to stop being number two, probably acting aggressively, offering our concept of international and economic relations and say in europe so guys, gas and oil. yes no more so idea. yes, you want to receive something , here is a list of goods that we need. here is what we need sent, we will think about the personal behavior of your politicians in relation to russia. and

i don’t take it from this history of ukraine, for example, they should be deprived of the opportunity to receive gas and oil from russia, you want to supply your armored personnel carriers and shaitan. there are no problems with their pipe. without gas, the last two theses, one is also economic, and they will warm up on fire, and the second one, the general humanitarian, is true, one concerns military operations. it is clear that in ukraine it is necessary to win already there is no doubt, but now they are specifically talking about this. and it was announced that it is clear that soon there will be russia, you yourself understand, the method of terrorism is all evidence that ukraine is a terrorist state. they just don’t throw a ball of them as luckily worth it, that is, they didn’t manage to send off the referent from the species and

the referent from min yust to take two girls and they report something that includes the fact that terrorist activities are undercover, and the kiev authorities are robbing russian pensioners. this is what is known anyway. yashka's rooms are all there. no, we will wait for us on centralism, we will discuss proving that we are not the sport of terrorism, but what lies on the surface and is collected in five leskov iron proofs. it is clear that they will be rejected. but at least it will sound someone this will understand in the middle uh, and uh the last uh, the final one in this case, uh, general humanitarian concern. that's all here. it's just that we're all humanists. eh, representatives of this. well what used to be called the intelligentsia. i do not hear the voices of our creative unions and creative associations. that's

when it was necessary to protect a man who exposes naked actors and actresses who have sex on stage, although this needs to be done from everyone else. that's where it's decided, and that's love. this is a separate question for the appendix of your program of the third part after ukraine and so. they deftly get up quickly, everyone understands my statements, but they all live, these all our creative unions live at the expense of the state budget. i'm not saying that they should lead there congresses. i don’t hear their voice at all, when they are immediately torn to pieces, anyone, including officials to the state, is accused of anything, now they are silent. you are tormented by the silence of only creative unions. why not only i, for example, the people's front, but me, for example, the silence of a number of

our governors happens. for example, i see the governors kozhemyako, who went to the donbass. i understand his position. i heard today the governors of st. petersburg strongly expressed. i know what andrey yurievich vorobyov is doing and a number of others governors. well it's clear who i mean, they can't afford to say what they think. but they support, apparently, those of their inhabitants who are inferior against the letter z such, but not a word in support of the special operation, it is clear whom i mean, did not say. but the governor should take longer for me to write down blatant appeals to youtube. if you say what should be a separate issue. i'm talking about, but look at this fact, at least the ukrainian intelligentsia. she's a nationalist full-cist, united

is valid. british german yes forced put under the ideological gun. they shut their mouths as much as they like, but ours, and we have fluorologisms free will, our intelligentsia years have passed, nothing has changed in the letter to alexei maksimovich gorky well, not all of the intelligentsia. takova but this used to be called capers. yes, when a biden was given out as a pirate, this is something that no, no, uh, the permission to rob the biden resumes this well-known anglo-saxon tradition in a whole series. e offers a whole package that is already back up our efforts. mainly aimed at countering the russian oligarchs did everything to deprive them of the money, uh, that they have accumulated, and their luxury homes. real estate

is what belongs to the military kleptocracy. we know who these bad people are. we know what they are doing. what are they doing and so it is necessary to confiscate this property, which is associated with the russian cryptocracy, new mechanisms and procedures will be created to carry out the seizure of the confiscation of this property. we do everything so that, when selling alligraphic assets, the proceeds are directed directly to the elimination of the damage caused to ukraine . well, i think that we, firstly, need to, uh, investigate these cases of the burist company, and personally the family of the biden citizen. and also i think that all american companies. now they can say goodbye to russian property and to all shares in russian business. well, i understand correctly, that is, well, this is declared such a war on the mutual destruction of any business relationship. we

cut out of all positions. you represent to this was treated. that's what china saw and what the arab world saw biden found the perfect way to bring down america is just perfect. okay. you know, after this speech, vitaly comrade said that it is clear that america is a terrorist state, in my opinion, it is still clear that it is a totalitarian state, moreover, combining the worst features of totalitarianism in the 20th century. this is confiscation from the rich expropriation of expressers. this is ours. here is the beginning of the twenties trotsky zinoviev yes, and it was very interesting oversee american foreign policy for the past 20 years. we all called for pragmatism. yes, do you remember in the early soviet union there was keith who was led by, uh, chile was a normal diplomat who wanted to cooperate and there was a comintern led by zinoviev who wanted to make a world revolution, and they were all the time watered.

in general, they interfered with each other. well the main thing was the winter in the main thing was the world revolution the same thing now. we appeal to their pragmatism, but they want to change the regime in our country, and not just the regime. they they even want to change the class structure of russian society when they took money from friedman and avian in england. yes, they were indignant, they said, how is it? we did n't do anything against you. we are ideological. in general, your people told them everything is calm money. we'll still take you. that is, you understand, those people with us who counted, as always on the pull, to somehow avoid these things. they do not understand how this decision will be made. this is how vitaly anatolyevich says the girls are sitting referents. here the girls will sit referents in the us has passed the racial quota for the gay quota and they will take a few set. you know how you girls set met with putin is rich. uh, a russian has a

russian passport. maybe four more passports are not important, and these, uh, coincide with a lot. from the point where they match, everything is confiscated and the person may even be put in jail, whatever. perhaps, moreover, this necessarily applies to the stalinist family; the principle of the son for the father is not responsible for these people does not work. look carefully at this one checkout, yes counturn american sandroid. ios true sound yes, it says not only children, not only wives, and parents are brothers and sisters, for some reason the same property. you can give them. isn't that totalitarianism? this is what rhetoric is. plus, this is the association. eh, really on a national basis. here i am now reading figaro, they are proud of sent 50 million bullets and shells. well, the cartridges are called to help the ukrainian army. i counted 100,000 people there, they are fighting. it turns out 500 bullets or shells per

one soldier and they do not participate in the war. this is not going to war. here she says, yes listraz 500 no, no, after all, more precisely, i counted 500. yes, but still, you will agree a lot. and uh, look uh, in general the situation is unprecedented. i don’t remember ever that all of europe really united against one country since 1529, when all of europe saved vienna from the tasmans, this was not the case, the first world war, the second world war. these were coalition clashes in europe yes, even hitler who conquered europe and suddenly it turned out that she likes him. yes, even he still could not take england. and now it's europe, it's the usa, it's canada, it's australia, it's japan, it's south korea , it's the whole western world against us. eh, i do n’t even remember anything like this since 1.525, but only a thing, as long as the farms are with us. yes, one thing. i

still want to direct the first ones, i would not want to. sadness, because when you are at war, you still need to have hope to load. yes, itchy poseidons have long been torn in swimming by sadness, the fins of poseidons. i think i need to understand one thing after all, the people are not against us. yes, look how many british- americans work for russia today. the same poles against us ideology, which is not scientific. eh, if this ideology was scientific, the european union would have flourished there would have been none. uh, no eurozone crisis, they got a great legacy. yes, if it were humane, yes, there would be no warrior in iraq, there would be no war in yugoslavia if it were recinalistic logically, they would not deprive their allies of friedman, equal to the same, and so on, but it is illogical, not scientific, not humane, and therefore it will not be possible to defeat the people. here

, it is possible to defeat ideology, and here, if we talk about how we can rebuild our propaganda, as she says vitalyevich, i propose to do as the americans did in the eighties. remember how they said, they said we are not against the soviet people. we adore the soviet people, excellent scientists. everything-everything-everything. well, you have a bad system. and we must tell them we are not against the american people, we are not against the polish people, we are against that ideology that destroys you, drives you to the grave and, uh, we offer you freedom. we do not impose our own on you in fact, and no. we offer you a set of many ideologies. remember how nazism was defeated nazism was won not only by the communists and not only by christianity. yes, nazism defeated an amazing coalition of orthodox serbs , soviet communists, americans, which means there are roosevelt leftists and others. together they defeated the nazis so that they understand that if nazism defeats them all, you know, i can

to say for sure nazism defeated soviet soldiers, right? and just one military-industrial complex the great ideology of communism, and although this is not customary to say, but how to celebrate vitaliytovich generalissimo supreme commander-in-chief, who clearly understood who to trust, how to trust and turned out to be more accurate than his counterpart on the other side. although stalin is not accepted. yes, mention yugoslavia, china after all. i mention in yugoslavia , too, the communists are the winners, i say, then i quarreled, yes, another question. well it was the communists suffered, but china is hard helped the french distance by 90% of the communists took place, of course, it was a

communist ideology, but if there was no soviet union, advertising command of the wehrmacht gives us a chance. if you accept my offer, you can take the helm. or life, i have an offer plane.