but in order to do this, you need to get the consent of at least two countries, china and russia, therefore, of course, what is being done with russia and these statements that russia needs forever are attempts, including to bring russia to such a state, when russia e, will be in their opinion. eh, here in this corner, when they say, well, listen, well, let's just so that you don't touch us further, we make concessions. we will agree to the presence of the germans. in the security council. maybe we'll spread it. i told you, i'm stating an opinion that i feel, uh, is there. uh, maybe russia will agree to somehow modify the right of the vet. what they have been striving for for a long time, so i would consider, and the speeches of the list of stras, just like such an attempt to change the world structure. at the same time, realizing that at the moment, oddly enough, she will fully support her and, by the way, in germany well, in general, of the two women from christina lambry, you or strass. i do not choose any, i

literally have one word here for the discussion that was uh in relation to what dana said, you understand what the problem is not in these. here are the politicians. the fact is that they again lit up an age- old dream. and this is what unites this europe from politicians to businessmen to the latest burghers. the dream is this. we finally again have a chance to stop our strategic vulnerability to forever take over the territory of russia and we will use everything that we have for free somehow divided among ourselves. america will tell us who has what share, but everyone will have according to his participation share in russian wealth, and we will finally solve the issue of our colonial vulnerability. no , of course, one remark, well, one short answer all the same. and i have a man of politics, not a

word at all, what he said to the europeans, take away your sovereignty and live with it. as you wish, so part of the europeans felt this taste. the soviet union was falling apart as a national one, including, i feel, the european union, it can and will also fall apart on the national issue. i'd like to take it seriously though. to what is contained in this speech, ladies and transport, because it is obvious that in addition to the fact that this is just a speech speech. it is also an ideological platform, very simple, extremely familiar, nothing new there. there is nothing new, not since the nineties, or even since the cold war. and since the time it was switched there, look, we are europe freedom is democracy against us persia is asia slavery, and therefore we must fight against them. there is absolutely nothing new here, and therefore you need to understand that e this is very

traditional for our opponents is such a paradigm in which they feel as comfortable as possible. it's just that we are for the first time for ourselves instead of resisting this paradigm or going our own way. i say we are inside this game. that is, we are trying all the time to prove that no, no, we are not an authoritarian state. we are democratic. although they came up with the idea that the state is either democratic, or authoritarian, or totalitarian. these are not some natural phenomena, to say either a thunderstorm or the sun, i don’t know there are steppe mountains. no, it is absolutely a figment of the imagination that the state can be one of the three and we play by these rules. at the moment, you need to understand that the desire of our western opponents for e, a comprehensive such control over the whole of humanity, the spread of their own ideas, has very deep civilizational cultural roots, because our western opponents are primarily carriers of the catholic religious culture. unlike,

say, orthodox culture, in which the orthodox church is the most close either to a particular nation or to enlarged ethnic groups in the catholic church. now the argentine is leading the church before he was a german before the germans was a pole before he was an italian. well, no one in this period considers this church, neither argentinean, nikolskaya, not italian, nor german. no matter what you are , and this universalism is to show us that all those ideologies that colleagues talked about today, liberalism and fascism and marxism, none of them appeared in russia, none of them appeared in china, they all also appeared in the western world, because they are the bearers of this desire to create such a global idea that can control humanity and in this case, mrs. trust makes such a traditional classical reliance on e, liberalism. very often such assessments are now heard saying that, well, you know, liberalism. initially, it was a good enough

idea, but the liberals themselves perverted it, or is it modern liberalism that is bad, and initially, from the very beginning, liberalism relied on lies, it relied on a non-existent methodology. it was absolutely unscientific and precisely because it contained all these critical errors. he had no other way than what he came to today. everything on which the operation of liberalism. it's a lie. well, very often in order to create a more positive image for this ideology, let's say separate quotes. without bringing them to the end , i often give this example and read it on the test. he says every person has the right to vote. only he does not put a dot there, leave a comma and speaks, but only with what the material condition allows him to have free will. well , we'll never talk about it. we will never say that liberal ideas could spread in the west to those states in which they could be implemented. revolutions

are accepted by constitutions, but they no longer extended to those colonies that they owned, because , of course, human rights, but not yet a big question. who is the person here? and who is not, then the evolution of this ideology should gradually lead to what we came to today and in the first place. this here is the infinite you open the text. uh, here's the speech of mrs. tras, well, in every sentence the word freedom freedom freedom freedom freedom freedom as if it were privatization freedom from liberalism. well, let's talk about freedom, what is freedom? freedom is first of all true, if you remember, the famous book of 1984 said that freedom begins where you can say that two plus two equals four, because there it means propagandize that two plus two equals five and so he says, where it can be said that 2 + 2 = 4, there is freedom, because it is about discovering the truth. here are even analyzes of this book from the outside. here is a modern liberal

scientist and they all criticize her for what they say freedom is not where you can say that 2 + 2 = 4, but where you can say that 2 + 2 = everything, into something sincerely. do you believe, this position of any modern liberal, that there is no truth , therefore there is no marriage, like the union between a man and a woman there is no sex, as absolutely. naturally. here is the natural state of a person, because it does not exist, first of all, because initially liberalism began with the fact that it always wants to free a person from everything. yes, maybe the first thing he was aiming at, there is a strict class division. something else that can cause sympathy, but after that he could not help but come to the conclusion that he should not try to free a person from his religious culture, not free him from his gender identity. the next step before that. this is what a person needs to be freed from the fact that he is a man, that the human is already evil, because it imposes a lot of restrictions. freedom in itself, no matter how

paradoxical it may sound, but freedom is self-restraint, a person is free, because, unlike an animal, he can limit his own instincts to liberalism. we are invited to live by our own instincts. never operate on any cultural societal norms behavior, forget about ethics, which defines us as people and no future of this ideology, except for self-destruction, i think it simply cannot be, and therefore we should not be surprised today by what mrs. important. we every time during the discussion. this is a very difficult question, because the historical fate of russia is very complicated. she, uh, in one hundred years passed the road that many other states passed in about 1,000, and huge upheavals and social political economic. but i think that we are birds, yes, but i think that we can find it even in our own history. the answer to the question of what defines us, did we have

, uh, a period when, for uh, seventy years in our state, uh, there was a marxist ideology? well, we know that even during the period of the island of confrontation itself, as a state, it was in danger of disappearing and destroying its population. uh, at that time the head of the soviet state, referring to the soviet the people chose to use those words that determined the thousand-year history of russia, they are these 20-30 years. i urge that we always, uh, position ourselves and know and are expected of us in any country, if you talk to people who are critical of what is happening in the state. they expect from russia that russia is a state that can give them back traditionalism, which can give them back the opportunity to be the same. what they are, they turn into these sexless benz people who have no value. parents of no origin

nothing absolutely i agree that this is what we can offer and what people will become for, and i would like to return to what alexander said about germany, after all, there is a very interesting trick of the germans. they say, so uh, you accuse us, that here we are sending weapons against the russians, whom we killed in the forties, but listen, we also fought with the ukrainians and, in percentage terms, the wermach killed most of the ukrainian population. yes, there means 10% or 20 30, than the population of the russian federation means this the conclusion was made this summer. so we are more to blame before the ukrainians than before the russians. so, we owe them just to send weapons. they say this in all seriousness, yes, after steinmar's speech, june 22, take berlin no, i propose. that's what's going on now getting rid of illusions. yes, this is the speech of mrs. tras. uh, ending up a long way. driving from some

illusions about the anglo-saxons. we need to stop the illusion that the germans have some special relationship with us and some of our supporters in europe and the people of illusions. no. for a long time yes, and a number of corrupt compromising elites. there is no illusion, but quite concrete interests. i would very much like to see a number of those who until recently worked for the state and for some reason are not on any sanctions list. and yes, they ran away. they returned their red ass to the country. and the laws answered to the fullest extent for all the crimes that they did not commit against our country. i have two short theses, but i can't help but react to what you said, so everyone is switching, say a. where do you teach him? how are you there hold? i run the faculty of the biggest

supermarkets. and you teach it as a student there. we have this set. no, i'm not in the program. here is volodya with what thoughts one cannot publish in western magazines, nor in any thoughts in many russian ones. uh, magazines can't be printed, but taught to students, but it's something. yes, i'm sorry, i just don't know, yes, i'm sincerely surprised, so we'll exchange, but i don't. the conversation about this is that you are afraid of nationalism with nazism. or rather, there and it seems that this, uh, is not enough. here is goethe's koran correctly. he says nazism is evil for us for them. well, for them this is not a word, so what we say, and we in ukraine, is more

nazism. first, they half say that there is no nazism. they have been saying this for 20 years and for the last eight years, and secondly, for them it is not a word, so it works in a certain area in our society, but something more is not needed there. so i really agree with the fact that dima described this whole chain of events, but i just want to say what? here's linking one with others. yes, they want to introduce this russia into colonial dependence. we were in their colonial dependence through the dollar system. now they want to do it there by force, but for now you are selling them. resources are needed. we automatically stay there. no, no, no, you are all these secret explicit schemes that you know there, it's all good, but this is a temporary historical story of poisons and poisoning. i'm not talking about this

secret scheme, which is there for what, although lousy dollars turn into our noble rubles. everything wonderful, but you have to jump out. forgive me with this system completely one word. you asked, you understand this very important, very important. so we said that the chinese are wise and they have it there. well, actually, yes, 5,000 years. and in general they like to point it out often. he's right. so i'll tell you. please note that since the end of the 2000s i have been in contact with many chinese comrades there. they are so, when it's not the same, they say we know. that they leave us no more than 5% of our chinese labor from the labor of every chinese. we know it right from the start at the beginning, when we went for this scheme, they told me, these are different people, the time when we will count for

ninety-five percent and withdraw, uh, a fine, this will definitely come, so it’s time for vidal to finish the hot philosophical ones, uh, we still have to wait 5,000 years, what are you looking for in a hurry, all 5,000 years. as the chinese twist 5,000 years here to stand waiting, i'm not going to act now. why should we get out of this system from what and where for a second, at least the statistical ones stop counting speculative capital, which we don’t have a damn no, it’s not enough for us to consider gdp he came from the people, as they say, his guy is just a deep topic, therefore, if possible, it’s to blame, yes, now advertising, and after them we will continue in a new composition. who is interested in the continuation of the crisis in ukraine

for the sake of weakening russia against the content that today's ukraine produces? i don't think that the ukrainian people like it in mariupol , there are thousands of testimonials, just collect, listen to what people say. and what then that tomorrow my head is just spinning from our partners. guys, don't dig a hole. ask yourself to get there for no reason. we are not once in history. this is his strength. let's do it now, what else do you even do exercises tomorrow at 14:55 on the russia channel? inaccessible packaging from 149 rubles. if delivery causes

inconvenience, order medicines at apteka.ru. you are looking for an advertisement that will help you get a free vtb multicard, right in front of you, get the opportunity to easily pay for purchases, return up to 20% cashback from partners and everything will work out in magnit hot discounts for all cases grill. oh ostankino 149 99 and the joints remain in excellent shape. a revolutionary composition for joints with new generation collagen let the joints remain young

we still have moscow gourmet. your taste buds at wildberries discounts up to 40% on a grill with nine automatic programs retro-style desktop refrigerator robot vacuum cleaner dry wet cleaning from midea morning should be vigorous, but what if you constantly suffer from pain in the joints pretzel, guide, is able to provide local pain relief anti-inflammatory and anti-edematous actions. and so that every morning could begin without pain. use dolgit cream in yellow packaging, dolgit available packaging from 149 rubles. gennady malakhov every evening yesterday at the knees gel horsepower. sounds profitable

m.video i have to look. look like this mom, try tasty. do everything please. and it tastes so good to me. credit three tens without bank insurance for any product worked out for any product in rbt.ru without bank insurance credit three tens andrey

chernyshov, if it weren't for you, i wouldn't be around. she also saved your life, but you thanked her, thanked her . all life is beautiful. on saturday at 21:00 on russia channel we will see and show more than others moscow kremlin putin every sunday at 22:00. hello this is a special radio broadcast. all the latest information about the conduct of a special military operation by the russian military round the clock, exporting companies are required to sell 80% of foreign exchange earnings when the situation changes every second from the latest information, which very few people know, we have moved forward to be the first to know the main points from which general positions can be predicted. tune in on the spot fm really. i don't know

what's going on in ukraine i'll explain why, because if you listen to what the politicians say. well, let's say the british are biden, then they generally need to rejoice. russia is losing terribly. ukraine wins and everything is wonderful and everything. okay. but it's all wonderful. all well leads to the fact that for some reason the wild amount of forces and means that sent to ukraine do not give any result. and when you start listening to military experts, they say that in fact the situation for ukraine is deplorable and the tragedy of what is happening is simply not told to ukraine, and biden’s loud statements that russia has not achieved some of its goals or for example. uh, the fact that glinkin said that russia sets the goal of capturing ukraine. but the president of the russian federation formulated the goals in a completely

different way. our goal, first of all, is not ukraine at all, but the strategic security of ukraine this an intermediate stage of a special military operation and about this operation. we also set very specific goals. well, here's how, for example, he evaluates, hated by our liberals. and by some american citizens, the wonderful russian military experts are getting closer to achieving victory, the russians are moving very slowly, deliberately slowly. just grinds the ukrainians. i think everyone who looks at this understands the united states when it all started we just sent javelins, stingers light anti-tank weapons, because no one i expected the ukrainians to hold out for so long if you were expecting planes loaded with tanks.

lord of the body and that's what represents now? well, it's still useless. no, nothing that reaches the front as a netron. the goal of the united states now is not the victory of ukraine, the goal is to bleed russia damn, you can say whatever you want, but ukraine has already suffered a strategic defeat. it's just chatter. russia, on the other hand, took a few laps. the game is over and i think that the goal of the united states is now to inflict the maximum lesson on russia on everything that is happening on ukraine is a murder every ukrainian soldier who is trained to use an american artillery gun will die in battle every ukraine said, this is learning to operate a polish tank. german armored vehicles are about to go to their deaths. if i could tell zelensky that the russian one is going to expand the operation to take all of southern ukraine to odessa. now this is still

unrealistic. if you surrender, end this war. ensure neutrality. guarantee, maybe russia will stop, taking only crimea donbass mariupol but still get most of the country. untouched. ask tens of thousands of lives, your soldiers civilians war guarantee defeat loss of territorial integrity of the lives of thousands of its inhabitants, pick up the phone. call putin and get it over with straight away. now this is such an attempt to quote. crown pick up the phone. call me putin but the situation on the fronts is going on. how goes me. so i

understand everything, that is, i hate the nazis, but here's how i think. well, what are they for them khristia? well fields littered with the corpses of your soldiers. but we say, well, at least take it away but take it back return them to their parents , at least bury them in a christian way. but our guys go to bury, well, there are so many corpses, but it's scary, but we began to carefully lay out, so that at least the parents know what happened to the children's documents. lay out the documents, just take pictures, but it 's terrible. we fight, well, quite differently. you, being on the defensive in a pure advantage, incur losses at times, if they are an order of magnitude greater than ours. you send there already, well, old people

my age. you are already simply hiding not only behind the backs of civilians, there are enough new people on the streets and send them. they they simply do not understand what is happening to them personnel wars hiding behind the backs of these mobilized as well. that is, you simply grind your people. for the sake of the interests of the anglo-saxons but is it really so difficult to understand? well, neither crimea nor donbass wants to live with you; now, as it turns out, neither zaporozhye nor kherson, nor kharkiv region. well, kherson is already there from the first, yes, there is not enough of this going into the ruble zone. you are so hate your former citizens that you start to swindle them with points. kherson says, a woman there says so, and why are you shooting us? no? why are you hitting with an elderly portal ? we are not ukrainian, military. we do not

set up military installations inside cities. why are you raisins, if you want these cities sometime. as you say, yours will be returned to you there . you don't shoot at the military no at peaceful quarters. vladimirovich yes, in general, of course, when you look, the cadres of our military correspondents. yes, i remember poddubny walking across the field, and she, unlike ukrainian there, who are all trying to examine these bodies, and it’s just obvious that everything is littered. yes, so you look at thirty in the background, then reports for the day two people died ukrainian military. that is, well, guys, chechens, they say, well, it’s impossible to be with such a smell, but if you don’t want to take it, we’ll bury it ourselves, but not humanly. oh well, it's only in the gucci smell. no, at least something about what at 20 °, well, like, yes, they lay

for several days, no one at all paid attention to anything back, of course, wonderful words of an american military expert they would now be twisted in ukraine very actively. yes, but about the fact that everyone will die, everyone you arm will die. you don't give them weapons to kill . weapons to kill them. what is the worst thing, and this is what i can’t understand, but are there really no people in ukraine who can say it out loud, realize it in general, when i look, when the arrestovich says, exactly the opposite things. uh, vasily suggested to me today that he somewhere stated that all 10 russian armies now in ukraine, i immediately think, wait, he said a few weeks ago that four out of ten have already been destroyed. and now suddenly 10, it turns out and you understand, and he has already forgotten about the four destroyed and the public forgot and

rejoices rejoices at this victory jumping. and the fields are covered and covered with bodies. so now you understand, right? why are you not in a hurry? why are we in no hurry at all? we protect the lives of our soldiers . we are now advancing firewall. then comes heavy equipment, and only then comes infantry. not just defending there today explained why we are slowly advancing, they say, uh, they are waiting until the heavy rains end, the downpours in the donbass that's because, because russians don't like to fight in the rain, that is, when it's freezing yes, remember, yes, then they told us that the russians don't fight when it's cold, then they said that the russians don't like to fight when they're frozen ground, they don't like to fight when it's really raining, i want to tell these brits. you can say that

i think no one will ask me in my opinion, it’s clear if the arrest officers who wanted to talk, that is, the six who wanted to kill me, thought to ask me first. in the broken ukrainian language, speaking with a bunch of mistakes of courage. he spoke there today. i don't know any words. he says watch russian propaganda in good ukrainian. so we are being fed fakes. e in good ukrainian. i think, well, of course, for an aristo, against the background of arrestovich, ukrainian love is your ukrainian against the background of ukrainian historical. well, they don't shoot him. yes, here. so that's not so fighting russians do not like to fight russians in the rain. i want to tell these brits. yes, russians do not like to fight at all. we don't want to fight.