put how you crush everything else, therefore, from this point of view, what is important for us now. for us , the most important thing now is what is happening, respectively, in the sixth package, it will be with you for several days, and the most important thing is the exceptions that will be there. this is the first point, the second very important point. we need to work right now on employment, because , accordingly, summer is a very important period. the second third is a very important moment, as if vanguy again at home. i still need to cut the rate lower the rate to run, respectively, a number of russian, which are now. well, it will be at the end of may. uh, so that the funds are launched and it is important we will also respond. what will happen today, and, accordingly, 18 in washington. this is naturally the speech of the heads of the rfu, as a result of which you will get very serious types of changes. in fact, there is already a depletion of credit monetary policy money will be washed out and emerging markets will be weakened by the national currency. and we are already isolated. that is, in fact, the situation is that we must respond correctly to this, including with our partners , primarily india, china. this is how we will win. and by the way, this mistake every time is not very correct, which the west makes every time thinking over

the sanctions of the countersense. we must first of all take into account that we do not suffer more than those against whom we are going to react. that's why i say there are asymmetric uh-huh as suggested by dmitry konstantinovich kiselev britain in the elections. asymmetric roller well, well, just this video has almost always been a supporter of moderation, at least in relation to this, both for sarmatism and after us. how are they all, in principle, developed, so here? of course you have to wait. must see, especially the last one. here is what is being said. as for china , the situation is different there, of course, for example, now you will resolve the issue. if you specify which poseidons. i have only one passive american corruption. in connection with the biden family.

i'm very interested. well, in connection with him, ukraine in china there, here, if the chinese comrades begin to reveal what hunter did, what joe himself did in china on i think that they have certain materials on this on this topic and how xi will react to this, but especially that there is an injection, the situation around the melting of the strait of malacca, this is also, well, their indicator is that all five aircraft carriers that are in the pacific ocean belong to the pacific command. they are all on the go. the last one was, in my opinion, a german under repair, it seems. came out anyway. here you go he is old, but he also came out. this is an interesting thing. wait, maybe they're seventy-five . this is the founder of syria because there are more javelins on the boat. well, sheverina, they represent us, but they already don’t give us enough howitzers. they can’t they

supply us, yes, judging by everything, taiwan was attributed to the 26th year, the taiwanese were offended, yes, i wanted to respond to two comments about the first lavrov, firstly sergey viktorovich, from my experience, how much i have been watching him, he does not say unnecessary words, but the fact that israel is turning in some such semblance of england where is going? all this is such a party, here earlier in england, an anti-russian party gathered. now it seems to be shifting there to the south. this is the first second years. there is no chance they came to england, because it is in england this is the banking center of the world now in israel because they have a stalemate in israel they have the only position when they are accepted, as people are accepted by the beau monde. there are just germans here, for which they are ready to pay for any anti-putin speech, in principle, and second thing. it's about negotiations. and i believe that the negotiations have fulfilled their task. they

did give a chance to china and gave a chance to india referring to these negotiations that russia is always open to them. and we are always ready to negotiate. we are always ready to end this conflict on our own terms at any moment. why not, therefore, the entire world community, progressive naturally. she highly appreciated these negotiations. at least the chinese foreign ministry is what i am following or the indian foreign ministry has actively used it completely here to the fullest in the speeches of any representative. ministry of foreign affairs of one country or another. it sounded that russia was ready for negotiations. as for the war? here vital just started this topic . the fact is that the war is against us. well, if not from the eleventh, that is, the fourteenth year and the war. by analogy with the first cold war , it should end in victory. so, then there was the question of the existence, either of the united states and in general of the capitalist world, the question was posed in the same way. first, second third crisis capitalism was supposed to lead to the collapse of this

system. or, so to speak, it will go into the socialist form at kenan, it was directly recorded 35 years. and the soviet union will either have to collapse or rebuild itself. now the same thing, the final goal of victory in the war, as for the west is the destruction of russia, the disappearance of russia , this is the second mistake of the ninety-first year, they will not allow it. when right now i was starting to talk about yekaterinburg and so on about this whole thing, then in the fact that in the nineties we kept quasi-political unity. and what didn’t they say about the northwestern republic, that around st. petersburg and the far eastern republics they didn’t speak ingrian, that is, yes, in fact ? this is the sprawling of such a quasi-political unity and the fact that they are now biting their elbows that the nineties russia has retained this unity. even, even if such a shaky political unity. now they won't allow it. now, if we give up now, they won't allow it. why do we have to

the west to act differently for us victory in this war will mean the collapse of the hegemony of the united states and obviously their disintegration is best , if it is an alignment, it will be best a controlled disintegration. that is, we will put their nuclear weapons under international control, in principle, this is the goal that should be set. forgive well here so it is put, basically. long-term goals for the cold war, in other words, if we don’t do this, if we don’t put such a chain, we will simply lose the environment, that is, lavrov the great russian diplomat. when sergeevich lavrov says a phrase, he is pulled out of context and my people say, how dare he, how can he, and how can my people not notice the rise of nazism in ukraine when the president of israel comes to direct pointed out how my people can not only not notice , what is happening in ukraine but does not even express a word of condemnation when the israelis record videos of how they go to ukraine and

, under bandera slogans, begin to fight against that country, which is 27 million soviet the country and the russian average were quite a few. yes, my people, my people are touchy. has its own and fair tragic experience of history. but doesn't the russian people have it? does n’t the feeling of the russian people play any role when they try to present us as a villain as a people, when they begin to tell fables, when everything around is littered with lies according to our code, which you just spoke about, in particular about butch can’t we is react. and when every time we say, look the nazis, we're in the nose trying to poke. well, what kind of nazis zelensky was a jew, it was precisely for this that sergei lavrov was forced to draw a

line that exists in historical literature, which, by the way, was not only caught by anti-semids, that is, just historians who are difficult to suspect in any respect. but you and i said very clearly that the most important thing is whether it influenced the political outlook. did it affect life, the very fact of his jewish origin affected zelensky’s life, and his view was not affected in any way, he turned out to be a faithful servant bandera killers. now watch the new issue of nikita mikhalkov's besogon program. does rage noble happen right after we get back to our studio? dear friends, we welcome you to our next issue of the author's program besogon tv

called can rage be noble, but first? i would like to congratulate you on the wonderful holiday of the resurrection of christ spasskaya and wish you the most important health, the strength of the courage of faith, the hope of love, and today, of course, in our time, also patience. and of course traditionally. i would like to thank you all for the attention you give to our program . and i would like to inform you, not without pleasure, that in total both the russia 24 channel and the russia 1 channel and youtube and the telegram channel. all together, they gathered more than 15 million viewers. and keep in mind that this is an inclusion. this means that one is watching. yes , maybe a third, maybe five people together, so, of course, our audience is huge. for

which we thank you very much, because it means that what we are talking about is of interest to you. to me it seems that sometimes it’s right, the question posed is more important than the answers in the question is everything that interests a person, how he poses the question and why he poses it, and here is one of these questions, and which arose after me, but not only me and very many have read that following this statement by an american rear admiral of the us navy on april 3, he is the spokesman for the pentagon and the state department. the united states calls him john kirby he stated that contrary to the logic of military action, us intelligence did not record from the end february until mid-april, not a single attempt by the armed forces of the russian federation and the lpr to

block the flow of american and european weapons coming into the possession of the front-line units of the afu in deliveries is in the pipeline as we speak, including the last 24 hours, "kirby said we will continue to do this as quickly and in the maximum volumes, we know that 90% of military equipment enters ukraine by planes to slovakia to poland e, railway, and across the border by road and so on there is question. it’s completely natural, it’s not even military, it’s absolutely clear to all mankind that a tank or a howitzer or a self-propelled gun or something else located on the platform is less dangerous than when they are already on the ground,

refueled and sent to the front line. and this question worries everyone. i say this is not to give any advice. but we read the following assumption analysis of the reasons for such selectivity in the choice of goals allows us to draw a conclusion. what's beyond the attention of planners operators of bshu, and missile strikes, objects that are directly related to the material interests of russian and ukrainian oligarchs remain, export goods and products manufactured at the enterprises of ukrainian oligarchs and partly their russian partners are also exported along the mentioned railway routes in the opposite direction to the west. if this is so, i understand as a human being that, well, who wants to lose profits, especially when these products have already been made, when all contacts have been established, and so on. i understand it very well but on the other hand, purely humanly, and well, if you

think about it, is it possible to put some times of inconvenience on the scales on the one hand, and there may be a loss of some profit, and on the other hand, life, uh, and peaceful people and our soldier is the question. and, therefore, in principle, of course, to get an answer to this question. we would all be very, well, i would say, the second question is very important and also in general , not a military person. the question is. what happens at our customs? listen, in short, a bunch of vile devils at the marinovka checkpoint, well, i don't know how he is. called by the russian federation , in my opinion, kuibyshev, if i'm not mistaken, but simply arrested or, as it was, detained for examination. uh, the phantom unmanned aerial vehicle under the pretext that it is

necessary to find out if it is not for military purposes, that is, a drone that was supposed to fight here in the donbas from tomorrow a drone for which women men collected money, some money was thrown off all over russia some odd, in short, decided to arrest and put for examination. she said she would last a month and when people collect. donations in order to send some kind of uniform or some kind of drone and so on, what our guys need. i think that slightly different rules should apply here. i think you think about it on the one hand. the west is simply knocking down foreign weapons in a jamb, muddling anything. and we, on our part, have problems of transferring to our soldiers what they need, but this is in

general, well, it’s strange to agree. i don't know, maybe it's some kind of accident or there's a misunderstanding, but i really don't want to believe that it could be the same sabotage. to which mikhail khodorkovsky called on our citizens, remember we call on citizens to general sabotage there are effective ways to put pressure on the authorities that do not require personal heroism you can sabotage any work of the military registration and enlistment offices the cases of conscripts in police departments can disappear they can forget to draw up protocols for detained citizens. they can massively stop paying utility bills or delay payment, even a transport collapse in large cities. failure of the traffic light system for drivers not to go to work. it will become a very noticeable event for people and will create a feeling of mass rejection of war. to lead a more radical point

of view, listen to the leadership of the russian customs. i have a question for you there, customs officers, who are the azov people, take their asses of those who stick out there and send them to mariupol, and this is not a sin. remember the phrase of napoleon bonaparte who said the people who do not want to feed their own army will feed someone else's. all the last time the attention of citizens is focused on what is happening in mariupol , as is well known, mariupol has been cleared and only at the huge, huge plant and azotal there is a rather large group of militants who are repeatedly invited to leave from there, having laid down their arms and surrendered, we also know from

radio intercepts that their request to their center , that is, the supreme commander on what to do received a categorical order to stand to the end of anyone who tries to go out on their own to shoot on the spot, as is known from the report, and our minister of defense to our the president, in principle, everything is ready for the assault on nitrogen, the president canceled this decision, explaining it very logically that there is no point in storming and risking our people when the steel is practically blocked by an assault in the industrial zone, i think it is inappropriate. i order cancel this is the case when we must think, that is, we must always be with him. in this case, all the more about saving the life and health of our soldiers and officers, there is no need to climb into these catalogs and crawl

there underground, but with this industrial facility. block off this industrial zone so that a fly does not fly by, that on april 21, more than one and a half thousand ukrainian military personnel laid down their arms in mariupol, and among them there are quite a few mercenaries who call themselves soldiers. good luck. here is an interrogation of one of these soldiers of fortune, a citizen of great britain. you look at his face, innocent and unhappy. tell me you killed people. i don't know.

moreover, this is an absolutely accurate professional sign - this is a corn on the index finger of the right hand. this means that the person fired a lot of shots. at the same time, i am convinced that this bullet did not fly into civilians into our soldiers in an army shooting range. and another confirmation is this sign on his hand, which even more clearly determines that this person was a professional. sniper, absolutely, of course. why the leadership of ukraine

prohibits. mazov’s militant to go outside, because a lot can be revealed, a lot we will learn and see among the ukrainian servicemen of the professional military of nato, which will absolutely clearly prove it again. what exactly is nato doing with us war with the hands and lives of ukrainians. you know, in general, such a comparison is a very convincing thing. she, as if with one glance , you can see one and the other side. look at these ukrainian prisoners of war with lowered eyes, wounded, tired, dirty, hungry, there are hundreds of them. but remember those two ukrainian prisoners of war who were shown what

their comrade was doing, maybe even themselves. step aside this is bullying. i don't know , i just don't have a daughter. well, i think it's wrong to have prisoners. what is it all about can they be on video? that's by and large and by some big. angare i would put all these prisoners in jail and show them this chronicle on the big screen. these documents would film their faces. this was done after the great patriotic war, when

german prisoners were put in a hangar. and showed them what they were doing. look at their face. that's parallel to the horror of these people. look at their supreme commander who gives them orders to do what they do and forbid them to surrender. 52 day cravings thank him respect proud. and he defeated everyone. comrade-in-arms of mr. arrestovich, no, i'm sorry. look at this . they say that their main task is to

defeat the nationalist battalion, that is, to take mariupol completely. but the president of ukraine said today that if the defenders of mariupol are destroyed, then ukraine will withdraw from negotiations, we will finish destroying until the last bastard dies here on our land. and this is a completely different matter. it is ukraine that will dictate its terms, and they have nothing to answer. they have crises, a terrible political catastrophe. they they do not know how to get out of this situation, primarily in the domestic market and that's it. this is actually a victory for ukraine. and here he is explaining the national idea of ​​ukraine native central national, where ukraine is as much as possible to lie to themselves and others. because if you tell the truth, everything will collapse and you have to come up with something else. here we have a basic unbalanced contradiction. and this is said by a freelance adviser to

the head of the office of the president of ukraine of this president. here, show it all. here are the prisoners. in a terrible state and position. show them who they are fighting for and imagine for a second. so that the leadership of ukraine would come to them to console them. i can’t predict how this could end with another topic that our viewers and subscribers discussed with great enthusiasm - this is our story in the last issue with dmitry sergeevich sand, while , you know, i noticed that this one still

exists. eh? that thinking of the soviet era, in which, if we talk about the boss, then only in excellent tones, so to speak, and it is not known how it will end. if someone e will say differently, but i am convinced that the time is not right even today, uh, the conversation is honest and reasoned, but it is more important than a difference in positions, one of the topics of our story with min sergeevich was this one at this meeting, presidential aide vladimir medinsky expressed, well, such an idea that it is for discussion. and why not really accept this experience and from childhood instill

the interests of respect for the state symbols of dima 's flank and so on. it was a proposal to discuss well, literally the next day. i read this is the reaction of the press secretary, deputy head of the presidential administration, mr. dmitry peskov , this is his reaction to the conversation that happened at that meeting, we read. i think that it was rather the initiative of one of the leaders of our military-historical society, and it has nothing to do with the official position, probably, this is how it should be treated. moreover, quite a bit of time passed and we learned that mr. peskov's opinion about state symbols, but it turned out

unofficial opinion, because the official opinion, that's what the flag anthem is about. yes, this is very correct and in demand, only it needs to be done with dignity, or so far where it is impossible to organize it in this way. it’s better to transfer somewhere, you understand, yes, so that it corresponds, so that the procedure itself corresponds to the significance of these, er, the significance of the symbols of the state. well, to honor mr. peskov, i can say that he is absolutely sincere, he called me, and we talked with him for quite a long time discussed the position of each, in principle, each remained to his own, but in our conversation there was nothing that could betray some kind of personal hostility or personal desire to offend someone.

i repeated dmitry sergeevich in this conversation that the word was spoken by a person at this level. it is estimated in a completely different way, it happens that it is simple. clear thought in the mouth. ah, a simple person. it flies by without hitting anyone, and no one focuses attention on it, and even the thought is said on a different level. she can buy absolutely silencing meaning here are things that seem to be completely. noticeable and not necessarily attention-grabbing, but it's still true that the devil is in the details. well, here is chulpan khamatova who expresses her point of view. this is her manifesto. here she comes to ivan urgant for transmission. here in this yellow-blue dress. these are the colors of the ukrainian flag. maybe it's all, it was a syllable. i don’t know,

but this is nate’s declaration. i think this is the right or the honored teacher edelman, who now lives in portugal. and in a conversation with a ukrainian journalist. we see that she is somewhere too and in yellow-blue colors hmm a hero, thank god it surprises me absolutely not, but when i see a statesman, it doesn’t matter any level of a statesman today who gives interviews, in general, journalists of a state hostile to us today a british sky news journalist in a blue shirt and yellow tie. it's not just one. i see it millions of people. i told dmitry about this. he did not answer this. i had a white shirt. but that means even worse. this

a journalist who talks to an official of another country allows himself to then photoshop on a computer to change the color of his shirt in order to provoke these questions, and i would not be at all surprised if it was done that way. remembering all the fake lies butch is all that is all that has been lied to in the world. why not? yes , for god's sake, precisely because i am absolutely sure that the connection between people and everyone else. it must be absolutely mutual. basically, we all answer to each other. i'm in it absolutely sure, especially today any ambiguity.