you have analyzed. here, at least, even the volume of fire missions that our artillery is now solving. 1.500-600 fire missions each fire mission - this is a minimum of 40-50 shells, multiply 50.000 shells, it turns out a day just in case, they need to be carried out so further that e rocket salvos do not need to be counted. perhaps look every time we are informed by missiles precision missiles. there were already long-range missiles hit there . yes, they need to be produced per day, from 5-6 up to 10-15 missiles are consumed there. this is how they should be made. we will produce so much now in five to six days, so even now, in these conditions, with this conflict, we urgently need to urgently transfer industry to our industry. as far as i know, the military-industrial complex is working now. you're still working on a half-and-a-half on this small conflict with one day off. eh yes, this is it. well, it's a small

conflict, it's a small conflict, it's a small conflict more than that, we now need an urgent order to restore our entire electronics industry, our entire industry, which was destroyed in the nineties. until i do something i heard that all this is how you actively do it, that is the question without central planning, especially here e machine tool industry, this is all decentralized planning can not be done. these are urgent urgent questions. and here. by the way, i want to say that solve problems. this plan should be people with others with a different worldview and philosophy. it should not be market-oriented people with any form, consciously not subconsciously. she market concepts of efficiency benefits and incentives there financial benefits. these should be constructive economists who should construct dialogues. in terms of economics, industry. on the concept on the basic concept of the balance of resources of the balance of consumption and production next, what do i

want to say? well under these conditions, of course i can say, it's not clear to me, to be honest. it is completely incomprehensible to me how gas supplies continue under such conditions, how we can now pay some kind of eurobonds. when i hear this, in any capacity it makes me dumbfounded could it be imagined that we would pay eurobonds, hitler's germany well, in europe there in the forty-first in the forty-fifth year, yes, it was impossible, that is, this matter also needs to be radically resolved. here it is shaping up. just don't shoot yourself in the foot at this point. that is, there is always , a million million. yes, but nonetheless. yes, yes, there must be another one. there is a moment there is another moment. so i pay attention to the western actions they are, as they say, they shot

the seminoku, but what is the essence of them is purely philosophy, military, purely military. yes, he has a goal of causing damage. and your damage is, as it were, secondary. in our country, the question is not at the forefront of damage to ourselves, and there, how it will turn out, that's the point , therefore, when they say that it is necessary to go on the counteroffensive. this is absolutely the right thing to do. but this is a counter -offensive. we have all the prerequisites. why the russian empire could launch a counteroffensive the soviet union had a powerful offensive seventies. this whole story with anti-colonialism was an ideology, there were resources, there were people, there was an information company now russia has everything, because an ideology has appeared that the president said it needs to be legalized, so we can decide everything, as far as the situation is concerned , i’ll say very in short, the best, - said

this man who spoke from the donbass, he said everything that needs to be said, now the situation is that he will already finish off this grouping, when it is finished off, and now there is a successful offensive and gnawing i. recall that the number of this grouping here is about 60 to 80 there. yes, even up to 100,000 people there are already from 40 to 50 left to finish them off, but the paulus army near stalingrad had 330,000. in captivity. we took 90, that is, we are talking about the fact that in order of magnitude these are the same forces. the task of two fronts was solved there for 2.5 months. why should we expect that here we will solve this problem in 3 days, we will definitely not solve it in 3 days. yes, but we have been deciding for more than 3 days, so we decide too 3 days of advertising.

the cause of more than 90 percent of forest fires is a person make sure that this person is not you, create cherkizova presents try. i received it, and maria ivanova whispered to us that the

playground of my hands will influence the improvement of my city. maybe everyone choose a project and vote for its implementation on the site outside the city sreda.ru. recipes together are more useful compare insurance offers see reviews ratings and buy osago 6 and 12 months installments in rbt.ru without bank insurance. billion rubles just two weeks jackpot from russian lotto with age, the metabolism slows down, someone has to take care of your body. debtor helps to normalize cholesterol and sugar, improving metabolism, debtor. be in shape, let health be normal.

get up and left so malicious execution on the spot. you know what awaits you at home, but the command of the wehrmacht gives us a chance. we have long been traitors to the motherland is free. you have to be a hero to

get out of captivity. we got yours. at 21:20 on the channel russia rest moscow kremlin putin every sunday at 22:00. a completely insane representative of the ministry of defense of latvia, in my opinion, said that ukraine was going to strike on the crimean bridge on may 9, and he says that, well, before ukraine is

given enough weapons to make this possible, but it seems to me that there should be no illusion that if there is even an attempt to strike at the crimean bridge, then the administrative quarter. and kiev should be, e, demolished from the face of the earth. and not only kiev that is, simply the level of the answer should be such that no one has asked the question. and why until now we have not destroyed these objects , obviously, representing a direct m-th role in command and control. well, that is, i am so polite, i choose my words, but, in my opinion, someone does not really understand, someone really wants us to switch from the regime of a special military operation to a regime. they asked for it themselves. and in the mode they asked for it, there will be no possibility. no zelensky to regularly record a tearful appeal about various foreign guests roam, kiev that

is, it will be a completely different regime and not 150,000 groupings will be sorted out in the army, a million people, of which only 150,000 conscripts, which we said that they would not take part. i also want to note that our strategic aviation is still using high-precision missiles. not us, in general, while we are generally acting so softly. many people ask the question inside the country guys. it may already be sighing, because, e.g., to the second stage, we have not even passed yet. yes nowhere did our ministry of defense say that we have moved on to the second stage of the operation. here in syria , for example, our toilet does not hesitate to work, and it has 24 tons of bombs with loads to find out what the wrath of god is, then let us look. yes, two. so

, preliminary remarks, which i think are very important. the first one is about guardianship. what the americans started. uh, get close to opek. this is such a very serious strategic one in fact, and a shift in their geo-economic activities, guardianship and communication oil monarchies hmm which, let me remind you, trade black gold for dollars , the main result of the seventy-third year. it wasn't that prices went up in america. and the fact that they began to trade oil for a dollar, which became a oil industry, is the only country that did not trade oil for dollars. well, in any case, the eighties, it was olivia as they say, we remember what happened to the lord, or rather, he called himself a comrade, comrade gaddafi, and in this sense, guardianship and money guarded the money of these sheikhs. they were on sweet things now

rather rudely, the americans began to get close to this money, saying that they had calculated and come to a conclusion. they are guys, they are rational about grandmas. and what about europe’s money to survive for a long time they might not have enough everyone wanted. and i think that they are well aware that they will not receive. now it won't work anymore. now they won’t get as much as they wanted, so the americans will follow the path of geographical expansion of the zone called the global fire, so they will set fire not only to europe, but also to called hmm at least a significant part of the middle east second comment. mm, of course, in europe, a real fight broke out. but who will be the colonies of the united states and who will be the dominion who will have the right to their own

domestic policy, and who will not, even this, of course, won this fight in this fight, mr. to recall that neither the dominion nor the colony. there is not and never can be a right to foreign policy. the only known exception. it was a domain called malaya, which gave the british empire a battleship during the first world war. well, i think they will be allowed to give the american empire an aircraft carrier. well, chip in and build it, will it be called a frenchman or whatever? well, whatever, here it is. uh, so that's all to do now about important things. and that's all, of course it's funny hmm about europe but why did i start talking about it? but because i see again, and the revival

of this pro-european group. and let's not uh europeans antagonize. but let's still have a dialogue, let's extend this period of preferential e preferential receipt of our gas yes, why is this all hmm, then what will we have , uh, it's in europe by the beginning of the twenty-third year, and maybe even earlier absolutely not independent states, therefore, from this struggle, someone who is a colony is not warm or cold for us, but rather cold now about america, i still don’t like laziness, but uh , of course, he was a thinker so background of the rest swindlers. e against the background of the rest means or a bright image of him so, of course, he was a thinker , he believed that from proezd 101 it was i who said, no,

i'm just very good to the soviet government. was it the first advice - this is an intellectual, but the revolution was made by a swindler and antonov did it all, there was, of course, an intellectual. that one, yes, and sverdlov, too, with an intellectual one. okay, i won't do anything. name it which of them did not make a revolution in the first government. no, they all made lunacharsky an intellectual. ok. well, than we are a little swindler anyway. no, well, about hinduism. yes, ah, but he thought he had a very correct idea that not a single government will fall if it is not pushed, so we can wait until the carrot spell, when the internal economic crisis. it will not collapse america, because america has always been able to do two things. the first is to find the enemy inside, and set everyone else on him. and how, for example, everything is absolute,

how in the seventies they found an internal enemy in the form of blacks and students and set them on workers and trade unions. so she will find someone now, and the second. it was unique for him to export his civil war to foreign markets, because in america you go to any bookstore and there are 100,500,000 books about the civil war. yes, they ruined a million people there, how many then died, it’s impossible to calculate for them at all. it's scary, they are afraid of civilians, they will do everything to get this ghost of the civil war. it would be exported, and in this connection the question arises, here again we have not arose right up to such and such an expectation. let's let's tolerate until the elections, autumn yes, and a big delusion. so what? well, they write it. let

's endure now in the fall. that's where it means, and there and winter is coming soon, and there is the next president, of course, yes. what will happen in autumn? yes? well, yes, well, most likely, these democrats will lose. uh, control of the legislature. well , actually, this group, which staged this hybrid war, and as tricks of its real war in ukraine, this only radicalizes. it will continue to radicalize here. we i must not really like, in general, the very term of hybrid war, hybrid war. you can shove everything into it, everything from cyber, so, yes, it's it 's just that, well, it's such an umbrella term that really does not mean anything. he is quite specific. this is not me, as a person who wrote a lot on this subject, who wrote, including those who defended their ph.d. dissertation back in 1993. i know very well.

and what is already written there russian candidates. unfortunately, i am already a russian candidate. yes but yes. i still had a white bone. yes, he makes a bone, but your specialty is cooler. yes 0.0014 developed economy catalytic countries 04. yes. well, then, but if we accept the immunology of hybrid warfare, then then we must work very clearly with the goal-setting of this hybrid warfare. here are the americans and they are well done, they absolutely clearly articulated what they want from a hybrid global, i emphasize a hybrid war with us. they want to destroy us. yes, yes, that their goal

is the disintegration of russia, the deprivation of its political and military-political, and even better economic independently. well, the economic self-employed will leave itself, and now the question. and what is the goal of a hybrid war? have we formulated it? we have formulated, we have, to a certain extent , more or less formulated our goals, uh, special military operations. although there are some questions there, but the goals of our hybrid war from the fact that we do not formulate them, the americans do not stop fighting with us. and we do not stop fighting with them on several fronts, and in this sense, we, of course, have the problem of goal setting and the purpose of formulating a strategy, because at the very last, a hybrid war, no matter how i feel about it , is an ideological war at its core. and here, of course, the questions are very serious, and even the slogan of angeli's freedom

will pass with him, because she is already free. uh, because, like an old woman, she is completely fooling, of course, it was just difficult to be good at all. well, firstly, in a country in which they say in a country, like russia, that there are no irreplaceable ones, after the irreplaceable chubais was given an ultimatum for 21 years irreplaceable is a little funny and the question is no longer with chubais, thank god. and how many more such chubais do you have? and they are irreplaceable. and 20 years is 30 years and 25. so you are a country of indispensable. which is sometimes accidental through their own fault not because of who was supposed to replace them. yourself from me. uh, about nuclear

weapons. i want to totally agree. there is no danger that a nuclear war will lead to the destruction of mankind, not with modern nuclear weapons, where they were used, firstly, most of the nuclear weapons will be directed at destruction. missiles with nuclear weapons in order to prevent their launch. this is the first main main direction, that is, it is much more important for the state to eliminate the ability of an enemy state to launch ballistic missiles. how to destroy a city? and this will be the main nuclear weapon. addition to those to those innovations that uh invent. well, that always leaves enough space and opportunity for everyone else. in what world? there is

a lot here, and you and volodya just said very great approval. eh, talking about the opposite. i am not stating with approval, simply yes, what is written in the concept? if its meaning is that, if the enemy knows about it, he will get scared and start. a counter strike does not stop nuclear-tipped missiles flying in your direction. it's a counter strike, we don't change. it only prevents one preventive. a primitive strike is successful, but it decides the enemy's ability to destroy or repairable damage to your state on the wall, and it frightens the oncoming one. and they

frightened or not, and if they are not frightened, and if they are semi-idiots, and if they counted wrong? and the rocket that they sent they will fly what will be good with them. well, the first task of any state is to protect itself. destroy the enemy to protect themselves. and therefore, they also believe that in this conflict, which exists, yes, on the part of the united states, there is a definite goal for russia to cease to exist, or i think that in russia there is exactly the goal that was determined in december to move nato bases and americans. the state of 97 is quite enough to ensure the security of russia, and russia has no more

goals today. in russia, the goal is to ensure its security and for this it is not necessary to destroy, the united states it is enough to return them to the state of the ninety-seventh year is another matter. what methods and how is it, right? that is, you propose that they be returned to the state of the ninety-seventh year, after all, it says something else , somehow you immediately think, but clinton took the president and will help. he fools more of his mia it is forbidden. he was twice, only we were left. monica is gone, he already met with tikhanovskaya on vova. after that, so that monica is no longer a ride. i just appreciate the security of russia should not be destroyed. this should not and cannot be the goal of russia. russia

may well exist if the united now exist, as it exists, the explanation is spelled out in the concept of the destruction of the united states, they also do not have it now. well, what happened now on the territory of ukraine lately violates our interests after all. those who talk about neutral status is still being worn. if you had a neutral status, if there is a neutral status, if this operation had not begun, the americans could easily create on the territory of ukraine a modern army of 300,000 with the most modern weapons that they supply on the borders of russia with high combat capability and there is no fundamental difference between the ability of ukrainian and russian soldier. this was clearly proven during the patriotic war, in the end

he was born in ukraine and he was ukrainian. so what could they do quite calmly in a year or two, without joining nato having a completely neutral status, like sweden create such an armored fist. right on the borders of russia and not to be left of ukraine tomorrow. under whatever neutral status it will be done there. there it will be done. and therefore, everyone who today looks at this space and thinks, what and how and how to bring what? understand on the territory of ukraine had to stand and the events got out of their control, through no fault of theirs. well, it has already happened. it's right here.

this was noticed, they had to speed up. should have been the strongest army in europe today well, armed with trained most modern weapons. and they would have given him so. and give them , uh, all the means, all the missiles that are and all the electronics, all that and this will be and this will be, and therefore, against the background of this, i hear regret from certain people in your country. but what bad things they are dragging into nato. end of hostilities and what do they see? you are the end of hostilities, the conclusion of an agreement, and the neutral status of this state to be stuffed with weapons.

generally understand what they are talking about. or today they are still in the euphoria of last year. that you can talk with someone and negotiate with someone against russia. there is a war. the war is not hybrid in this war, which is why today only one thing is not used. armed units of direct participation in the battles with russia, all the rest, and even the ukrainian army, are fighting against russia and nato is fighting against russia with american weapons , and it will be and tomorrow too. i want too just to remind you. so that if they succeeded in this adventure, belarus and also

was in the balance. this suggests that despite all your desires, all of yours were understood. the most dangerous situations for your state have almost come true, ukraine this is the last and strategic plan of the united states, it's just before the year 25 russia should cease to exist, this is the deadline. because then they only have 5 years left to rein in china without russia if i don’t have time, they don’t have flaws 5 years to shoot china for the thirtieth year. and in this schedule they work and in this schedule they increase the pressure. and they are intensifying the war against russia by all

means, based on this, we must act. i totally agree. this is what i was saying yesterday, well, in another dimension in another situation. you must act in other ways, all your concepts that existed last year must be changed, adapting them by the twenty-second to the twenty- third year to the conditions of an ever-increasing war. dmitry i probably agree in one thing with someone else, and in the other no, well, look, as if i agree with god, i agree. this is where i won’t even soften here, uh, our southwestern issue will still have to be resolved. it will have to be resolved before what exactly, so to speak, are the lines in the west in the very west of ukraine. this is a question, because it has always been a cultural issue throughout the history of the russian state, this is what will be there where ivana fran