no, absolutely no value, but at the same time people who should not be engaged. they must understand that they are guaranteed even if it is private capital. well, tell them, even if you're here will break the law. we clearly guarantee you that you will not have problems or change the law. that, in fact, is all. it won't work any other way. it won't work at all. that is, here you find alternative trees, which means sources of supply, and or you are setting up what you can set up or are trying to set up. here for example, now a large number of things. you just need to directively give the command to try to copy it, if it should actually go away, there are 10-15 years, try to copy these things, nothing terrible, so to speak. i honestly don't see it in the end. china has become china just didn’t invent anything like that. in fact, from what they are now than they are now filling up the world, they bought copied what they could copy copied because they could not copy it. that, in fact, is all without the state. here it is impossible to do. and by the way, here, if we are to look for, so to speak, an ideological formula for the future, here, of course. and the question of social

justice and the achievement of goals without greater participation of the state in the economy. they still say so, it's impossible for two more important things. we were talking about russophobia here, as it were, yes, this is on the well-known, so to speak , statement of moratsky. here is marovetsky, when he said that russian measures are a cancerous tumor. so to speak, it must be removed and so on, he just expressed. eh, it was the quintessence, indeed, of the attitude of the west to the russian people , to all those who consider themselves russians and to the russian state project towards russia, eh, the quintessence of attitude. west is hatred for russia, yes, maybe it's trite, but nonetheless. i want the russians to reach the russians and all those who consider themselves russians. really. in fact, everything that is happening today in ukraine is only an aggravation of our eternal struggle with the west, and the meaning of this struggle of the country of the west is the destruction physical destruction of russians, that is, the russians are here, if they remain here, they must give up what the russians were to me to give up and become traitors. you don’t refuse it, then you must

be either dead or a slave like this, there’s no other way, this is exactly what we are talking about from the point of view of the attitude of the west and you don’t have to invent any of these very colorful pictures about the fact that well, they are just against putin but they just say so for democracy, not true. here marovetsky clearly said, because what is russian honey, after all. this historical real would be the habitat of the russians, where they had the right. so to speak, to defend their own, as it were, interests, ranging from the right to statehood, ending with the right to at least speak their own language. this is what we are denied, this is what we are denied, you have no right to anything, start your own language, end up with your own state. and by the way, when the project of the russian world, yes, at one time, how it began to develop here, uh, they slowed down, but they slowed it down, here in the first place queue of people sitting in high offices, some are still sitting. they themselves were afraid of this russian world. ah-ah-ah, it's the same, maybe it's unknown. what will end including here and refused. they pushed him into it, so to speak, into a

dusty corner and said, you know, we will solve everything using economic methods. we will all interfere with economic methods and approaches on the territory with economic methods. uh, the former soviet union failed. let's be honest and ukraine is the brightest. an example of this the failure of the business approach, both to building the russian state and to solving problems on its own means beyond its borders, has completely failed completely, because from the point of view of business, ukraine is much more profitable. in fact, it was to have a good relationship with russia and with the west, remaining between them, but ukraine chose another for it, they chose another. she chose another does not matter. and when they actually began to bury the project here, the russian world did not think. and what will you do with the millions of russians who are behind outside the country. that's why we have in ukraine tens and hundreds of thousands of people who are russian by blood, who feel themselves non-russian and, moreover, hate russia, that's why we have tens and hundreds of thousands of people here in russia

for sure tens of people, including young people who are ethnic russians, but hate russia as soon as they left universities because they were brought up there, they leave universities. they don’t know how to do anything, they don’t know anything, they didn’t build anything, didn’t create anything, they didn’t see anything, russia is no longer loved, no longer loved, despite the surnames ivanov petrov, so to speak, and so on and so forth. this is important, therefore, as it were, besides money, there are things much deeper money will always know there will be no russia there will be no russians there will not be those customers, and there will be money, so money is good, but money is a tool and the last thing that i i wanted to say, because, uh, about everything, the rest is wonderful. let's say others about it, as it were, yes, they say little. now we are ukraine in relation to e ukrainian the orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate is undergoing a process of direct destruction. now, so to speak, yes, in addition to the fact that they kill and shoot down. so to speak, the priests are selected by the parish. now they have actually broken, or at least they are finally breaking through the knee, so to speak, and the pescopat on the ukrainian legal church, and

a decision is being prepared, according to which some kind of assembly will be assembled, not a cathedral. so to speak, the church they are here a council of bishops and laity, which will have to demand autocephaly, that is, complete independence, they acted in the same way at one time, when, after the collapse of the soviet union , patriarch filaret denisenko came, they gathered the cathedral of the laity in the same way. and who are these laymen? we know it will be used people, it will be people from the nationalist community, so to speak, who will finally break through the knee. so to speak, the ukrainian orthodox church. as a result, we see a process in ukraine in which they say that they are against the totalitarian past. in fact, the most difficult object. e forms of this past states. uh, claiming total control of this church, claiming to make it absolutely controllable. so to speak, a toy that now i will have no relationship for christians in ukraine. i think it will end up with christianity not being there. this is the process of destruction of orthodox christianity. i think this should be understood, first they will replace christ with a nation

for nationalism. then they will merge, this with others, so to speak with other schismatics. after all. it will be latinization and further complete disintegration, complete disintegration and in fact the transformation into an anti-christian sect is also important, why am i to all russians. eh, how should i put it this way, before that i said that the russian must understand, what is at stake. moreover, this is your destruction, and to all those who are considered russians by all orthodox christians in ukraine, i must say it is about the destruction of christianity and orthodoxy in ukraine. as such , it is important for those who are ukrainian orthodox and such consider themselves here, i consider it important to proceed already about everything. the rest is great said that others are very important, plus tonight , in my opinion, a wooden church was already burned in the odessa region and such facts are happening all over every day. vandalism, but i also heard this information that they are now trying to seize the ukrainian orthodox church yakovlevich and in continuation of what sergey said, the strongest

company under the leadership of the united states is now going on all over the world in order for the orthodox church to exclude the russian orthodox church from orthodox churches , what they recognize is the pressure on the greek is the pressure on all the hierarchies in europe and in the united states that is, russophobia. today it is already proceeding in the most natural and basic way of the existence of the russian people in orthodoxy, to exclude the russian people from orthodoxy and to make orthodoxy without the russian people. and hostile to the russian people, this process is now headed by the americans. it's a lot more dangerous and a lot more, uh, hostile, because i'm not the one to explain what it means for

the russian people to be excluded from orthodoxy. world, at least officially. uh, you were talking about the fact that you have no law, they repealed the article on the prohibition of ideology correctly, but i will accept it in the constitution. they adopted a large number of amendments to the constitution, in my opinion, more than a thousand were proposed by everyone, the problem is that this part is located in that part of the constitution, in order to change it, it is necessary to go through a complex procedure there. yes, there are referendums of everything else that is a complicated procedure. it is impossible to pass time. it means higher the parliamentary bodies of the country are not capable of this. yes

, the time required for the amendments turned out to be significantly less than for the de facto rewriting of the constitution . i i do not give my assessments, my attitude to this is sorted out. the constitution is adopted differently and until they decide they do not come out. in our country , according to the law, changes to the constitution in these parts are not enough for dads, and moms also just need to do colossal work there, so do it. it was for this that i proposed from the very beginning to write another constitution; there are still people’s elected representatives there. in relation to astro germany i don't know, i'm good at sausage, i understand, liver sausage, it 's the cheapest. therefore, the definition for it is

correctly the cheapest of the last remnants of meat, they make liber sausage, not comparing with krakow. why is it more, and this is true, that is, the ukrainians themselves have an absolutely clear definition of you being a sausage, but the cheapest one, but this is a german expression of a proverb. i'm just for what and the most leftover meat, this is a booth, right? ah, but the very last leftover meat is a booth, just sorry about the uk. it's overgeling too big good weapon. sarmat uk doesn't need

nuclear weapons at all. one or one and a half volleys of a multi-purpose submarine with circomans and about 560 power plants in great britain will cease to exist in 10 minutes and the whole of great britain will return to the stone age in 10 minutes. nothing else is needed, no nuclear weapons, nothing in the stone age, she will be back in 10 minutes. what to do there with two submarines with american missiles, these are trifles, this is also not necessary, that is, for the americans to spend nuclear weapons on the uk. ineffective why is rogozin a generous person, and rogozin is a generous person to him with fittings. there are more suitable targets not for great britain, i say again. best of all, 40 50 power plants in one

gulp, and still there is no country. and it's good. this is true and not only in relation to the uk to any country the use of nuclear weapons. it's only against you nuclear weapons against civilian targets. there are more effective means, thank god there are in the hands of russia. i have read the speech carefully. lavrov - it is very interesting, very correct. she made me happy in almost everything. now it has been determined there that russian foreign policy has been striving for a compromise for a very long time. and in each in each conflict, they tried to come to a compromise. it didn't help. i already determines this has not led to

positive results. that is, it can be assumed that if the minister of foreign affairs says that the policy of seeking compromises did not lead us to positive results. the logical conclusion is that it is coming to an end, that is, further the goal will not be to find a compromise, but to find a solution to the search for compromises. if i understood correctly or , as i understand it, lavrov, she did not allow russia to really and sufficiently achieve your state interests, and thank god the second thing that i liked was that he referred to the conclusion and to the assessments of people who are not in the world, primarily karagans. so your copper is serious to all the analyzes that are made of foreign policy and even people that do not apply. it 's very good and uh positive, but on the other

hand. it seems to me that in your policy pursued, foreign policy in recent years has been the chief consultant anesthetist. he said that none of your actions caused pain or inconvenience in your truth. here, so that they do not feel anything anesthesia. i hope that he will be fired and your foreign policy will be without arrest, and so that they really feel that such an example is necessary find an anesthesiologist next to you and say everything is free. well, the fact is that recently, yesterday, your president spoke with the president of finland. i was interested in what the president said. i

was interested in what president earth said. and the president of finland said something unexpected. and the words of the president of russia were unexpectedly not as harsh as i thought. that is, what the president of russia said turned out to be a pleasant surprise for him, he even said the worst. it seems to me that in this case, the courtesy of you and your president played such a thing. they accept for the weakness of calculation. and i hope that he was afraid that the president of russia, not understanding his tactics in this conversation, would warn him what russia would do if putin was in the habits. i hope that the actions of russia in response to what finland has done is this

vile ungrateful act. will make both the president of finland and the people of finland reconsider and think of what a tragic result this will lead to the finnish state and this is in the hands of your government. that is, it can be practically proved that politeness in relations with him does not mean that the action will weak or ineffective and the last thing i wanted to say. look, you have. a lot of criticism in relation to your authorities by your power, by the ministers in power of all the rest well , look what is being done in your opponents. look at what mediocrity what primitiveness there is in the united states of europe who is in charge there? the same no comparison goes in

anything and with all the fairness of part of your criticism. you should rejoice that it is precisely such unfortunate wretched ones who guide your government officials who are against you. and the fact that biden is the president of the united states, thank god, and that harris will be president tomorrow even better. even better, because what they are doing is they are destroying their states systematically. so, as no country from the outside could do something about it, the united states with the american economy with the american society with the american power that now, probably, the sausage stands in the place of the chancellor. well, no enemy of germany would wish. didn't think of that, here

up to this. the fact that whoever sits in the place of the minister of defense of germany, like any enemy of germany, if only any intelligence would like to put big money so that this creature manages the defense of germany, rejoice. what happened. in a moment of tension, it turned out that all these systems had long been rotten. for a long time not perfect contradictory begin to break down from the moment. aggravation of the conflict between russia and the west today russia is stronger and they are weaker relative to one another. the economy of europe today and the united states is weaker in relation to what

has become the russian economy, all comparisons relative to one another are not relative to abstract figures. so for now in this conflict. the further he goes. it strengthens russia even more and weakens your opponents even more, and thank god, i beg you, i can’t help but turn to the words of the crown georgievich, because they concerned belarus. the fact is that these plans are not a secret for us ; moreover, the arrestovich recently said quite specifically that there will be no peace with russia, because there is a belarusian issue, or would russia mean that belarus will take, or we, well, since ukraine cannot lose in this war, as you know. so, they will take it accordingly. they, that is, you understand, we have been watching all the time, and here is the

only thought that life hangs by a thread. and i think this is a profit, you understand, they are looking closely. our territory and our resources, and in 2020 we already knew that the secret services of this so-called lublin troika of the lublin triangle, the heads of special services, they they were going to discuss. to whom what sphere of influence will depart. and how many territories do they intend to leave under the control of the puppet regime headed by this woman who fled, as you know, to the republic of lithuania, that is, we all know this, and we are preparing for this, moreover, the likelihood of war, the likelihood of a military attack on the territory of belarus in ukrainian, let's say, politics forming circles. discussed quite seriously in february and march. so this year now, after a series of military diplomatic measures taken others, oh, which i cannot expand here on something that is public space, have greatly strengthened the southern border. so, apparently,

the decision-making centers, which, as you know, are located mainly in britain, nevertheless established themselves in the opinion that it is not worth it. conduct an aggressive offensive war in the direction of the territory of belarus. here they are now raging in the transnistrian region, but in my opinion. there, too, there is already, as it were, the danger of unleashing a conflict, at least for a certain period of time until the moment the offensive of russian troops in the direction of odessa has been postponed. here, as for e, that arbitrariness of lawlessness, which is created by the authorities in latvia in the first place. let's face it in latvia - this lawlessness and arbitrariness against our people, russian belarusians, ukrainians of any russian-speaking, has been happening since the creation of an independent latvian state. there, how many percent of citizens of people who are struck by the rights of blacks, as they call them, is more than ten percent of the population. this is 200 50.000 people, in my opinion, that's all of them for years for decades, three decades, discriminated against

now we just saw. what happened in the context of the celebration of victory day, but let's not forget what happened. yes, and always here it is. uh, let's say, so vile semi-fascist state formation and belarus and russia, due to transit due to trade, fed with their money representatives of your creative intelligentsia of political circles loved weight, but it's true to buy a house in jurmala to go there to relax last year, and after 2014 latvia's aggressive policy became most obvious after the crimean e, which means that after the annexation of crimea to russia last year , latvia went to russia and boasted that trade had returned to a crisis level. that is, well, well, the depandemic is 3 billion euros and exports and imports are approximately equal. it is clear that for russia 1.5 billion are mere pennies, but for latvia 1.5 billion euros. it seems to me that these are certain financial resources. well

, is it really impossible at least in this direction. here answer it the way you should. it would be worthy. in my opinion, superpowers, and it would not be painful for you, what are you constantly talking about ? i agree with you, introducing various kinds of countersenses and restrictions. no need to amputate your leg, no need to harm your country. well , and, probably, with regard to the fact that our westerners, let's say so. opponents change themselves as the heirs of roman civilization, well, we remember another concept of moscow, the third rome, and i remember this is philotheus. pskov is the xvi century, moscow the third rome and the fourth does not happen. so we 'll see more. whose will take more than once. they came here with the war. this is also a traditional trip to the east. uh, the middle ages stretches, with whom our ancestors fought. uh, with whom alexander nevsky fought with whom. uh, the ancestors of modern belarusians under the green ice, who were defeated at 45. we

all understand perfectly well that it was not only the germans who moved. it was all collective back. that is, apparently, this is still a clash of civilization, uh, a certain kind of permanent process, in which humanity exists. it's not in vain in russian. a saying appeared to the people that it’s good for a russian, then death for a german is an offended sausage, but the only point i disagree with my colleagues? this is about the degree of rottenness of the collective west of its ruling elite, i do not exclude that the external contour? well, i ’ll use this non-diplomatic word, sometimes consisting of outright idiots outwardly counter power. he is not the main one there, that's the point. therefore biden, yes, who says hello to non-existent people who met with kosygin, and i do not rule out that in the near future. yes, it is possible. immediate prospects, you can meet with yeltsin, you understand, this cannot be ruled out here. well, it is convenient, like a kind of screen, but a real decision-making center. in

my opinion. this is probably the frs, uh, americanists can argue about what you also talked about with regards to americanists. yes, this is an interesting discussion. uh, in soviet times, in my opinion , in our americanists, who worked, including in interests of various centers of analytical special services. they sought to promote soviet influence in the us and during the period of the modern russian federation forgive me. i will not say that all specialists of this kind are engaged in this. well, many so-called americans seek to promote american influence in russia, so we don't have social groups there now and no political structures that we can attack. the communist party was very successful, for example, there is also the concept of human frustration. i look, chulpan khamatova okay, condemned. okay, there are fake tears, but now it's may 9th. she went out.

she laid flowers. she was outraged at how they deal with russian speakers, how they threw them behind bars. she even said a word. and this is the problem of chulpan, having embarked on the path of betrayal, he can no longer get rid of it, and he can no longer gild his hands and play a role . chulpan chulpan you and people like you, you did not even notice. how you betrayed and sold the history of your country, the history of your family, you betrayed your homeland, but you will not find a new one. the main thing here is not try to return frightened patriots advertising. after that, we'll talk to maria zakharova, director of the department of information of sadness at the russian foreign ministry. this is

our new head coach this season, you won't be the team captain. ravshana kurkova you are a coach, i played with you exclusively working relationship.

just collect evidence, listen to what people say. tomorrow my head is just spinning from our partners, guys. tomorrow at

14:55 on the channel russia different eras child book feelings, my heart is free great country. do you heal people? love story we watch the history of russia in the application or on

the website for free without registration. in the past, what is invincible patrol boats? i have suggestions.