the testament is not against katya asu against a minor parsley. in which our hope, let's put it, i'll find it, and what? andrey ivanovich i need this paper by force i live no man. there is no paper force different cases happen. whoever listens and falls, then eat something, otherwise the fortune of the heirs is changeable. so we would also have such a case, but as soon as you, without suffering, you yourself understand whose suffering you are talking about. and what is possible without suffering? i now lord, i ask you, no one

will leave here today. and tomorrow too in the morning i will go, which they want to buy lord, you generally know what an oath of allegiance is. as you said, you forget to keep in mind, sir, and call to explain yourself. just to the puffed up turkey. stop, stop interrupting me in my own house. in the morning i will go to elizaveta and warn about baturin. it's clear to you. i do not know how to thank you, i only beg you how to tell these princesses at once come back. otherwise, i

well, that's nice. language

what's wrong are you an idiot sometimes? 20 drops of these

competitively just fall asleep, and such an easy death to anyone need to pray. this is belladonna. and no smell or color. i will go. there are many things to do before morning. with morning tea i spend. so that he poisoned the whole council to go and warn her would not work. night in the yard. well then. stay here, i'll get through alone. no, let's get together. but you

can't stay here without me. it would be possible to take refuge in austria francesca on foot throughout the city with such sasha would not work. revna father should not know about this. sasha don't you understand? i can't run now. do you hear me? first i i must find this cursed will to save my friends. i won’t run away, an hour and them and myself too. faster

let's go. what do you need was a cannon located in the fortress for theft? fedor want to see him alive? since to me though, this is barina tea 20, drops at a time. what is

it? i can't do anything without permission . if you see fedor gone, you will get his severed head. this is enough for your comfortable life until the end of your days. do what you can confidently get fedor roll, on all four sides. you will receive money immediately. how will you get back this vial? i'm waiting for you here hurry up.

thank you, of course, you after us i am your debtor we are now all your debtors simple grigorievna we have forgotten how i can contact you, but you need to come up with a password that you will call francesca your tea your highness

i need to skip. what happened to you?

good girl, so i don't see you in the palace again. so what's wrong with you? they are waiting for you there, my people tomorrow

at 21:20. well, in any case, it must be said that the era ended, of course, with the death of mikhail sergeyevich gorbachev, the era ended somehow during a special military operation, it so happened that all the heroes are anti-heroes, depending on who relates to this period. here is the tragic period of the collapse of the soviet union . yeltsin passed away much earlier. most recently, both kravchuk and the burbulis who took part, here is shushkevich and mikhail

sergeevich gorbachev died tonight by the way, he lived longer than all the leaders who have ever been at the very top of power in the russian soviet empire, or modern russia he lived for a year, probably with a little longer than kirensky yes. it's on its own. by the way, it is very important that mikhail sergeevich gorbachev was not shot, was not thrown over the walls, was killed, that he did not become a victim of a palace coup. that he didn't die at his workplace? this is evidence that fundamental changes have taken place in our country . the question at what cost? i question what is it all going to be decided by historians of politics. the death of

mikhail sergeevich was reacted very differently in the west and within our country in the west photographs on the front pages of all major european and american newspapers, there is not a single significant western politician who would not express his condolences. daughters of mikhail sergeevich family members on the other hand, of course, it is necessary to clearly understand that in russia relations are completely different, not for everyone, not for everyone, but for a significant part of our people, gorbachev's merit puts the opening for russia of the path to free europe and, of course, the collapse of the soviet union puts those who hate the soviet union and believe that we were evil empire. to gorbachev's merit, the west writes that he dissolved the warsaw pact. that he took the

path of disarmament and generally dreamed that the world would become nuclear-free. forgetting that these decisions of mikhail sergeyevich allowed the west to move nato to our borders and feed the neighbors. now independent states, neo-nazism and russophobia. much later, mikhail sergeevich himself understood that he had been deceived. and in particular, he pointed out to the americans their arrogance when they talk about some kind of victory in the cold war. read that it is not? as the americans write, mikhail sergeevich naive believed that the promise given by one us president is binding on another and that the word of american politicians is just as reliable, as the word of an american businessman represented to us in old soviet films, it turned out, of course, not like him. nothing like that. i was especially surprised by the reaction

of the baltic politicians. who managed to spit just spit. i feel like there will be a lot. yes, yes, i understand that journalists will appear many amazing things, to the word vitaly tochevich everything that flies out at the time of departure already literary, but still we will try to control ourselves. why do we have to cut it just in case, we won't cut it just in case. we are too lazy, you have to understand. whether we need to squeak it or not, but, of course, this is indecent, because well, that the balts should idolize gorbachev, so to speak, as the germans idolize, because against the will of the world leaders, gorbachev insisted on the

unification of germany and we now see how germany thanked russia, we withdrew our we have withdrawn troops from eastern europe our troops from afghanistan and of course, the assessments that we give to this now are strikingly different from those assessments that were given in the late eighties. as soon as russia went after the bloody nineties, which became a consequence of the notorious freedom although, on the other hand, what does the notorious freedom mean? it's a question, how do you use it? this is a matter of culture. it's just that the people who, under the guise of freedom, understood the revelry of the anarchs, seized power with what speed. instead of the first secretaries came, the third and the komsomol leaders, who quickly betrayed the ideals that allegedly guided their lives, were not satisfied with the absolutely disgusting gangster revelry,

having built on the spot. the deceased will be for the soviet union by the gangster oligarchic criminal power, with which only at the beginning of the 2000s they began to cope and bring to life. we were then declared empires of evil now that we have raised our heads, when we have put things in order in the country, when they began to talk about their national interests, we are again declares empire now instead of cold war. we have a sanctioned place of the iron curtain - the tightening or the pledged regime, which borey announced today, while verbukov talks about how to strategically reorient politics. here is the attitude of russia, all the gratitude of the germans. now it is expressed in the fact that these heirs of the nazis and nazi ideology are happy to supply weapons to kill russian soldiers who are fighting

bandera nazism on the territory of ukraine and liberate the ukrainian people. in essence, the proposal standard that come from this, how to weaken our country? how to fail a special operation in ukraine how to create an internal split by supporting those who oppose the kremlin i knew mikhail sergeevich i probably, like the whole country in the early eighties. but we were going through a five-year period of magnificent funerals and the appearance of mikhail sergeevich gorbachev was perceived simply as a breath of fresh air, especially at the beginning, when mikhail sergeevich came, he came with such an appeal to the creative intelligentsia. moreover, he has, uh, the terminology was very specific. he's the one we've been discussing this topic since this morning and there was a feeling that he wants to return to the origins of socialism, that he wants to return to lenin's

legacy. i remember how then the spectacle was so victorious, when suddenly interest in the lenin legacy arose again, how there was an attempt to clear it of bureaucracy in order to return and suddenly gradually. here is the charm. at the same time, it was not by chance that a feeling of lenin arose because gorbachev was so much younger in age. all the leaders who were in our country before him, that he seemed like you, although it should be noted that at the moment when mikhail sergeevich came to class. he, in my opinion, was already 10 years older than lenin. well, lenin came 17 there at 47 years old. well, of course, and he is 57, and there is the average life expectancy. i even i even about other things lenin died at the age of 53. yes, yes, and gorbachev only headed the country for 57 years, but still it was a decade younger than the people around him

was the old man. yes, because he was 10 years older than the members, grandfather lenin is conscious. here it is anyway was. well, the old man was not because grandpa lenin was because he was 10 years older than the other members. well, gradually it suddenly became clear that, but again, this is my aggravation. personally, what mikhail sergeevich lost to me. a very strange decision of the personnel policy, and suddenly we began to see how the power slips out of our hands, and then such a kaleidoscope and you look and you begin to not understand. where is my homeland? it is no coincidence that on the one hand, they showed you everything that everything that westerners are printing now, and on the other hand, here mikhail sergeevich on december 14, 16, they discuss in an interview. i do nonetheless. i didn’t want either

one or the other case, so that we would not have a civil war. and everything was on the brains could be revived if the split. and the struggle for power in a country such as ours, with oversaturated weapons. this means that the pot in order to hold on to power. went to that's it. people what time did the destruction of everything no, this is not for him to allow. and my victory is that i left power. i worry that there is no proper understanding. togo and beyond my plans for my actions in the country. and for the country

and for the world, our decision perestroika opened the way for a turn made. direction of cooperation direction of peace preservation of peace i now regret that i was not able to complete it. it was an interview with nbc magazines, but the people took it differently here in the movie brother 2, perhaps the most accurate description of how the people reacted to this, which manifested itself in the elections of the ninety- sixth year, when gorbachev collected a humiliating number of votes in your support. where is your motherland, son? i passed gorbachev and the homeland of an american to hang out beautifully, and now your

homeland is warm ass and you know it better than me. sergeevich lavrov spoke about gorbachev's reaction from the west to his death. you have seen how now these western figures, who are now glorifying the era of rapprochement between east and west after the cold war, while declaring themselves the winners in the cold war. a few days ago, they also participated in another coven called the crimean platform, during which hysterical they demanded to return, as they say, crimea to ukraine to stop the aggression, the occupation, and so on and so forth, very much, you know, there are many battles of coincidences in history. it just so happened that a few days later mikhail sergeyevich, the first and last president of the soviet union, died in one of his interviews, when he was no longer there. uh, in office not so long ago, maybe a year and a half he was

asked exactly about this, and in the soviet union they asked him how this happened i was in ukraine he said that he was ukrainian his wife was russian his wife was ukrainian, he said that for him there was no difference, he said that ukrainian lands. especially here, eastern ukraine has always been russian lands, mikhail sergeevich said in an open interview, and only within the framework of the soviet union did ukraine receive elements of statehood. and when the collapse of the soviet union occurred, which he was very hard going through. as you know, and he recalled this in that very interview and said that the golozhye agreements to part with the soviet union all triumphed, that we are now in power and he emphasized that no one thought about crimea, which is historically russian according to all the laws

of justice. that's when western figures glorifying the contribution of mikhail sergeyevich to world politics are ignored. these are his statements, which by and large go. in line with the same analysis that is given in president putin's articles, this is an obvious double standard. and this is a clear desire to use the name of this person, including after he was gone for their geopolitical purposes, the peacemaker has already happily published photos of mikhail sergeyevich, he was it was brought there in the sixteenth year, just for this it was crossed out with the inscription liquidate. that is, these scoundrels are ready to stomp on labor. you know. but he was the president of my country. he didn't sign her breakup no? but he did not arrest the bastards who

ruined it. he decided to leave so as not to start a civil war, but the civil war was already blazing on the territory of the soviet union, we already had sumgayit, and it was already difficult for us in tajikistan. we already had vilnius, tbilisi was already blazing with us. take and arrest in belovezhskaya more than the conspirators, he was obliged. in my opinion, a history always remains a record. the last head of the great power 290 million at the peak, yes, there was 1/6 of the land. there are 140 and 1/7 left. and the tragic nineties that were the bomb

was planted. a weak-willed decision, probably a good person. indeed, one of the most beautiful love stories is the story of mikhail sergeevich without a doubt. above the statesman we are waiting for something else. how wisely did the ancients speak? and the dead? or good or nothing but the truth? well the truth must be heard and i don't understand how the president of a great country even left his post. can act in commercials. luv tone or something else, i looked at it all and thought. this is not how it should be. well, it just shouldn't be. i

will repeat to you, now once again this pizza hut advertisement, by the way, pizza hut, in my opinion, left russia. let's see this is gorbachev thanks to him, we have new opportunities. we have a list of sometimes nothing will exchange people.

and in the morning this idea appeared to me, just at the word fluffit showed. when did you sell? for lentil chowder primogeniture head of the greatest country in the world 16.5% of world gdp in many ways the second vitalyevich but i'm not ready, at least for the next nine. you can discuss mikhail sergeevich gorbachev as a person for forty days, and as a politician i knew him too well for at least 10 years from 90, from the end

of 1991, i regularly communicated with him. why did the private setting of families fly with him abroad? well, tell me, you're right, well, the man was a good one, so on. it's me now saying what i i say, and i even tell my friends, even when i disagree with them, he is a good person or a bad person. well, maybe they don’t agree with politics, but you were friends with him, a traitor cannot be a good person. everything happens. a feast close to him was very good. i rolled. we had friendly relations with the merts. uh, i didn't get to live. if i found out that a person is a scoundrel. yes, so, here, uh, i, to the

best of my modest strength, i then had the opportunity to support him after this resignation. e, total there are examples of living he is in difficult times helped my independent newspaper helped a lot . uh, so uh i 'll say it all someday, but not now, so i want to. question how many questions does it hang? eh, this is how he feels that but such a genre of comparative life is a description of the caesars, as a rule, but we will tell him, i will not talk about the neighbors of the feed, but just from the caesars there is such a city, simbirsk in russia now ulyanovsk is called in the second eti of the 19th century. e, there e was born and studied in one of the gymnasiums, either the first or the second was called e, the boy volodya

ulyanov gymnasium the director of the gymnasium was a certain fyodor kerrinsky, and a little later alexander sasha kelinsky studied at the same gymnasium. and the trustees of the educational district of the entire simbirsk, maybe something else was included there, really a state councilor. and this is then the rank of general, but the civil er, so nikolai is the same ilya ilya nikolaevich ilyasov, we did not study at all. here is the phenomenon of seven berdsk this school this city gave two leaders. in russia, i know if there is another place like this, yes, the leningrad state university, yes, this is the faculty of law of the two presidents of russia. you puzzled me

for the first time during our acquaintance. that is, i wanted to say something, but i was stumped. i returned to those years, which means that the first head of the provisional government of prince lvov was almost forgotten there. uh, modern youth, in fact, have not heard from this, so alexander after all. he got russia, well, not in a luxurious state, but all the same, the collapse of the industry of the front began, everything, and by the autumn the power falls out. everyone laughs. power over him fall out and then the older graduate of this gymnasium vladimirovich ulyanov lenin takes this power. and by the time of his actual departure from the real all with the disease of politics by the twenty-

second year. what's this? the end is the severity of 6.5 years from 85 to the ninety-first year we get from the collapsed empire of the soviet union, which began victory in the civil war. and the beginning of the renaissance of industry and so on, and our country becomes, by the way, light than two tens of millions of people, or maybe billions of people living something then, what in the globe? here are uh two lives here is a comparative biographies of two people who gained power in russia in about one of the historical periods. and one was able to do both lawyers. both received higher education about - in

general, the depicted layer of the then taricents. the role of the personality of this story, or something else, but this is the result. in one case, we see before kiev really passed until the eighties, or something, about the year 92, who understood it? by the time that in the usa where he lived, what is here in russia in the textbooks there, yes, what was he to remember . this is so special. a mausoleum was erected for lenin. it was a deprivation, uh, there then that but excuse me, it was supported by the masses of the people, here they put a mausoleum for lenin, and no matter how anyone, so that this ingenious great politician builder has not yet spoken to the destruction of the russian empire. he put a little uh hand, of course, he wanted to turn, uh

destroy this one, stop, denounced and so on, but not him. e, the first of those who shook to the end. uh, he destroyed the foundation for many years and how he could theoretically and quite practically decomposed the army, as much as they could. here are uh parallels comparing the historical real of our uh history there is no abstract, not ancient greek or roman, and american, not e latin american. well, i was nicholas ii, a very good man and very fond of his wife. yes, and he decided not to shed blood and did not shoot the generals and other aristocratic bastards who had passed to him. he says that it is necessary to sign, uh, a resignation decree. this is an actuator

alexei and he could, and pavel said even you can i will kill the lord but i will still remain your emperor will be a very good person witnessed both the destruction of a great empire and the terrible tragic death of his family. here is also a historical parallel. yes, he was a good man, very good. very good better so here's the government. i hope, i hope that these days, and especially on friday, when they take place, how the farewell to mikhail sergeyevich will take place on saturday earlier. well, i heard that goodbye is friday. yes, i think it's saturday these days uh 2 day, e, no matter who does not belong, and these people will not

come there, not with their tantrums, not with fair packages, not with provocateurs, you need to bring. i hope that it will be so, and it will be it will be worthy. let's have a discussion. we will continue. well, as for the latest events , and so they talked a lot about them, uh, but today at 5:00, you read yes, these balts, of course, but uh, well , it’s clear that you are a bastard. well, it’s clear that everyone for yesterday was their grandfathers and they themselves would now now have hydrococks appeared. they went to him again, that this kind of politically fought against hitler and fought valiantly, but not those who are now leading? come on, abbot, i say, and those who are, uh, the descendants of those who were on the side of the soviet army of the soviet union anti-fascist, by the way, uh, the movement of that time. they often sit in prisons there, because they dare to disagree with all this. so,

but this duck is danced by all of modern europe, and nothing can surprise me anymore. here today. there they were going to limit russia altogether. uh, the level of idiocy of infantilism. uh, that means russia responds with sanctions. russia keeps using gas, as a political weapon, well, nonsense. i answered you for hitting me. why did you answer me? how dare you answer me? well, i don’t even know the children, in my opinion, they understand, and the logic of such statements or these czech republic, uh, too. known. what position did they occupy mainly during the years of world war ii, which means? at this time, we

can’t talk about tourism from the russian federation at all, this is the position of the cell, firstly, uh. i don’t quite understand what the position of the czech republic means, but it’s good current government. well, probably a ban. i don't understand our uh, our passivity, we seem to be worried about this, as if we are saying that why are you doing this? well, russian citizens do not need to go. uh, in this very far east, he is going through terrible. well, come on, it's a different matter in special operations. they are wildly worried . tankers are checking passports to see if there is a schengen or they won’t let them into the czech republic, or the last example, because today i read that there are 12 in the toilet, or 15 estonian companies asked their governments, so that 28 28 yes, that means that they should be excluded temporarily so that they can receive. on the

wheel from russia now, if i were sitting in the kremlin, but i do not sit in the kremlin pay attention to this shortcoming. you need to fix it, you understand, but i'm not from st. petersburg either. i studied. there, not only now people from st. petersburg are sitting in the kremlin, i would say, yes? i have the command to restore. t-34 in narva she returns the pedestal. i don’t know if it’s worth 5,000 dollars or euros, it’s an operation to lead them there and immediately vrubaev back. i think it's time for russia’s sides of this kind are strong or symbolically strong, well, either strong economic steps and certainly don’t worry all the time, but now schengen visas will be increased for us, both in the classics and bulgakov, the soldiers started well. and now it's finished, i would call and say who those

russian companies that act as counterparties. they have to buy from someone. i would call the call, which means you are trading with them. what does it mean that there is still no economic and commercial blockade? nothing should go nazi put things in order inside the state of this, but i propose to put things in order, and then we’ll see, and then the t34 will have time to install the armature sergeevich, my late father worked as an assistant, as you know, about which from time to time. i get comments, like there your father collapsed the ussr with gorbachev. even a well-known political scientist will not now give a surname in the nineties. i remember writing such a book, where it turned out that the actual collapse of the soviet union from gorbachev

interesting such forest ones, of course, i will remind you that assistant that in the ussr that in today's russia is not a political figure and never makes decisions. so, as they say, okay, let 's note it, but nevertheless, thanks to this, not only close, but mikhail sergeyevich recognized first, i want to express my condolences. his family, his loved ones. e, to everyone, everything to everyone, and to relatives. uh, second, uh. i must say he was a good man. he was definitely a good person. he was a charming person. he was a very charismatic person, very open and friendly. and as they say, in the sense, in this sense, to say, uh, there is no doubt about the fact that you said the truth, well, either the truth. yes, well, the truth is, only god knows at all and people have different truths, so we are arranged, we are looking for that truth that someone guesses. what god knows. but, in fact, they are really

different, so you can talk about mikhail sergeyevich in very different ways. eh, when you say that he, maybe the bialowieza one could have arrested this agreement there. i couldn't. he, just like nikolai , could not arrest those generals who they came because no one obeyed him at that time, when the belavezha agreements were signed, everyone obeyed yeltsin. and no one followed his orders, so there are historical circumstances that, so to speak, over the years, as if they go away, we forget that in general, in general, direct responsibility for the collapse of the ussr lies with boris nikolayevich, who since the eighty-ninth year, by the way, not so long ago i read an article by the late burbules literally shortly before his death, where he is frank. since 89, our team has been is aimed at, as they say, to withdraw the russian federation from the composition and composition of the ussr

that is, it would have been supported in the eighty- ninth year, it was still subordinate to the kgb, still subordinate, but already to him. well, he didn't make another mistake. i say too. well, it’s necessary, how would they support him, and i must say that in the ninetieth year, when it was e, the supreme council of the russian federation voted for the sovereignty of russia, by the way, for this ivanovich will not allow, probably, many members of the communist party of the russian federation to lie, they voted then, what it was almost not unanimously, well then dpss, and then they became the communist party of the russian federation a lot of people. many people love this today. that's for now. no, they would say, they are an architect through now through the historical ruins that dzhiganov wrote in those same years, well, it turns out well in a different way to the russian federation. i mean that yeltsin supported a huge

number of our citizens. just as they say, at the beginning, millions of demonstrations came out in support of yeltsin to say this, and he led the country to collapse, but in my opinion, well, i feel that way about stories, this is my view. and as they say, who doesn't like it. agree, who doesn’t, but in my opinion, to blame e gorbachev or even yeltsin for the collapse, so to speak, here is the great ussr that i love loved and will love and appreciate very much. well, it 's like blaming it. e was such an emperor of ganuria, the last emperor of the roman empire. that's the same as blaming ambition for the collapse of the roman empire. nobody remembers this ganuri, there are historical circumstances that occur apart from, apart from the will of historical figures. i don't believe. and in all cases is not acceptable this idea that the historical figure. it

fundamentally changes the course of history. he can influence the course of history if he gets on the right side, there are such people in history. they seem to remain, but pochev found himself in a situation where the soviet union in my opinion, with all my love for the soviet union, he, in principle, was already objectively doomed in this configuration, and a market economy was needed and that's all understood and said it, and reforms were needed. how to do it? no one knew and gorbachev did not know, but this process was irreversible. it was historically inevitable, therefore, sprinkle ashes on your head and moreover, i absolutely do not agree that the soviet soviet union fulfilled its great mission in this world and, by the way, the communist party of the soviet union it fulfilled this mission because the main mission of the soviet union was quickly

modernize the country, which was done to win the war with the west, defeat the west and restore the country in that model already further. on another it is impossible it was necessary to exist, and it was necessary to change it, it was necessary as well as the national republic is already obvious. they sooner or later. they had to leave the soviet union, so to speak, those who are now trying to prove the opposite. well, try to drive back. here in the soviet union there is a central asian. i'm not even talking about fishing. well, these are the countries, who wants someone, and some of the russians want this today, so that they return it again. eh, so to speak to us a configuration. here it does not interfere. russia to remain great country empire is still, but in my opinion. as they say, that period has passed, so the problem is mikhail sergeevich’s trouble, that is, such a trouble

. well, like him, so he, unfortunately, will remain in history as the last leader of the great country, and nothing can be done about it. here with this. nothing to do about. here it is, as they say, don’t throw away the stories so that his supporters don’t talk about what he gave there, then he really gave a lot of freedom, there is a movement of glasnost and so on and so forth. many things. vaughn, he really did a good job, he stopped the cold war, so to speak, but history is a cruel thing, honorius remained the emperor, the last emperor of the roman empire, and no one remembers him anymore, so i, for example, do not agree that this is the era of mikhail sergeyevich this era is the era that of the post-soviet hmm, so to speak , a period, but it continues, by the way, our current president, vladimir vladimirovich, is part of this era, and it has not yet ended. she continues. and maybe, by the way,

let's hope that just our president will become one of the main persons, in general, these are eras, and the fate of mikhail sergeevich as a politi? in this sense, in my opinion, it still remains, uh, remains a politician who was present at the reception and could not do anything about it, just like nicholas ii you say nicholas ii is torture to arrest and shoot nicholas ii did not disdain to shoot when he could so to speak, static sunday suppression in the revolution of 905. he was not absolutely an angel in that sense. so to speak in glossy the execution of all this we were before soviet textbooks, but this is a fact, but at that moment the country was already in a state where nothing could be done with it. this is the system of the russian empire came to a state where it had to be transformed into something new. here it is right, vitali, that is,

says it was transformed in an unexpected way into the soviet union, that is, into a new state. but that state is gone, and nicholas ii, no matter how he says it, still remains, uh, in history, as a loser in the tsar. yes, anyway, he remained in history as the last tsar. eh, the tragic fate of him, of course, and of his family , but he remained in this way, therefore, in this sense, i, uh, do not think that we need to say so today, and of course, serge played. admitted, in my opinion, and yeltsin is a fundamental mistake. in my opinion, they did not consist in the fact that the soviet union collapsed, but in the fact that neither mikhail sergeevich nor boris nikolayevich created the conditions for the dispersion to come out of this collapse in the best condition in the best condition. that's it. i agree. since he did not sign, uh, the agreement with nato and not expansion is not signed this paper as well as yeltsin's answer,

as yeltsin could well put a condition, at least crimea, and maybe those donbass could take and so on and put conditions in the baltic countries. they would go for it at that time to leave the russian bases in tallinn in riga and there would be no nato and leave. as they say, the control of the railway, the road at that moment they would have gone for it all. he didn't. here's what. listen to that, i think, uh, those fundamental mistakes that mikhail sergeevich made and boris nikolayevich in this sense, but uh, on the other hand, they were products of their time and those people who both experienced this lesson, which should be learned from this, as they say, uh, learn, because thanks to this we now we know for sure that you can’t trust the west, and we didn’t know this in the nineties in the eighties,

we really we really are . gotta stop this cold war. very well. it was not that gorbachev from z and everyone was against it. it was the natural desire of the people. and, by the way, there is no need to be ashamed of this desire, because in fact . this is the right desire to end the cold war to create. you are in europe to stop cooperation, as they say, endless rivalry, these were the right ideas, but unfortunately, now this experience shows us that we cannot be trusted and correctly says that the baltic republics i read this one minister of defense of lithuania well, here's an example for you, damn it, they gave independence and gave everything for which they did not

fight, and now he calls this man a criminal, he is a criminal gorbachev man, who was one of all along with yeltsin. in fact, yeltsins was the first to recognize, as far as i remember, but formally. yes, informally. he first recognized he recognized when he became president of russia , he recognized. this 89 is the first thing he made. he recognized the baltic rowan independence of the baltic republics. that's him, actually admitted even gorbachev tried. something there to twist something could not do anything. well, in general . you see, here we are. that's all we'll find out. we're just advertising, but you feed with all the love, and when the people? was he in a position that the authorities listened to him, that the people of imperial russia or what? i wanted nicholas ii not to be or the soviet union, remember the people of the ussr how they voted , they voted so that the soviet union would remain such an incomprehensible wording, well, in a new form, we are all a little too volodya

of course, firstly, part of the soviet people did not vote; part of the republic did not vote. this is also a fact, then it is, as they say, on the one hand. they voted for the preservation of the soviet union, on the other hand they voted in ukraine for an independent ukraine, so when we give an argument whether the people want it or not, it is for a politician. this is of course very important, but we must lead. i'm not saying lead the main lesson, which was learned from this, that in russia power can be any but weak. maybe anyone but the weak, and when we talk about the fact that we did not know that the west is a deceiver, the question is to all the institutions that worked, when we talk about why gorbachev did not succeed because when you gorbachev's policy was politely speaking , not the most thoughtful. why was she thoughtless? and, because he did not understand until the last moment what he wanted to do. there was no

specific plan laid out clearly. there was no theory of what he wanted to do. this is also a very serious question, very deep. and when he deprived the communist party of the soviet union of the status that was laid down in the constitution , then, of course, instantly the entire structure of the soviet union went limp and fell apart, he decided. same. well, you remember how he decided. it was yeltsin's ultimatum; he could not do anything at once ; the authorities dictated the weak ultimatum. yeltsin was weak, it was more honest to say then in the eighty-seventh year, i tried, but i did not succeed. i'm retiring because next to us is china where he took xiao ping and broke it through the cabin with a party strong. why wasn't she strong? he had a strong one because he worked. for some time he was collecting relied on people, but here because

zadon made a cultural revolution before that and made a purge of the party. but we didn't do it again, too, so you see, try it, you think, it's so easy to purge on the scale of such a country, they say, wait, on the scale of china, it was very difficult. yes, but the situation was different. the facts remain the fact that the great soviet union was not there, and still that's all we see. these are the consequences of the collapse, this is what is called here. in the next one, we will live with this unfortunate feeling all the time and transfer it to our youth. this is better than russia, and of course, and so that we constantly instill this feeling that we are losers, we have this from the west all the time emphasize. you are the losers, we were so

lucky that the soviet union collapsed, there is the russian federation, we must talk about this. the russian federation is our homeland, we must save it. we must be some kind of positive ending citizens to sprinkle ashes on their heads. well, guys, it’s impossible all the time, where the border of our homeland ends. as it was said, vladimir vladimirovich putin on the russian geographical society of russia's borders does not end with advertising anywhere. when i was elected kensek, among the list of the most important tasks was perestroika russia , a country that generally lends itself to reforms, we had quite big desires glad to see democracy, where did gorbachev come from, outback steppe blood, christianity, all generations of gorbachev

christians. i think that the lesson of chernobyl is not out of date. you see what is happening in the world and looked beyond the horizon. we have achieved a lot. we watch mikhail gorbachev and documentaries about his era in the application and on the website buckwheat at the fork in packages for only 9 rubles. walk insulated kanka for only 399 rubles. juicy whole chicken cheeseburger for 89 rubles.

i missed you, you missed me. get zavr for every 555 rubles collect and get a chance to win, call in a mobile application that, if you transfer it to a reliable bank, you can pay for your pension by the state, and the bank you choose to switch from vtb's pension is simply reliable and profitable, the pensioner will get 100,000 rubles. it is worth hurrying, and the first 40,000 are guaranteed to receive 1,000 rubles each. go to vtb and everything will work out attention, in case of

allergy poisoning and a hangover, it's time to drink polysorb what could be better than indian ace, everything is the same and cariburgers taste spicy sauce vanga chat is not in paired with kfc's signature chicken on carly's bun. new caret minila from 69 rubles. already in kfc magnet. buy cheaper spanish 99 99 more discounts in the magnet mobile app. so you say no, well, they are so tasty, because they are made from the meat of their own verms. well, what if she is three nights later than her and you won't stop me, cherkizovo and it's so tasty for me to have discounts for the school year. just say school sale plus installment on everything for

37.99 rub. and even in installments only longing in the eyes. this morning misses how the city wants to come without warnings of one's own wife at 21:00 on the channel, russia welcome to our temple of song when the broad russian soul is sung. make it impossible to sit. i jumped up, as if stung, i look, i can’t, i roared the whole song about. it was so truly singing along. the whole vast country from

moscow to the most important ones is great. for me, you are a real madman, even more soulful songs. i love these songs even more powerful voices. no, it's impossible at 21:30 on the channel, russia i

felt that you want to rush into battle right away. well i want to be the last 20 years worked sergeevich here is our latest common book. i want to show you i give you. everyone writes there. somewhat abstractly of his illness. but the bottom line is that he continued to be conscious all these years. well, as they say, we have gathered today on the day when, as it is customary to talk about the dead in russia, either it’s good or not, you add, in addition to rights, i don’t add, therefore. is the muscle still dwell on the personality of what he did?

i would like to refer to the old tradition of putin putin giving an assessment of me. she was unexpected noted that he was a great statesman and statesman, who had a huge impact on the course of world history, he did not actually decipher. in his time, from the external point of view of foreign policy, he made actions that few people did before him and after him. i mean the end of the cold war. i mean, the transition to destruction, which has greatly improved the lives of people. it was no accident that he was given the nobel prize, unlike some other presidents. i mean in the usa who were given before their activities. but what did he do? besides

, what did he do? influence on the course of world history in the external plan, i recall, under him the war in afghanistan was stopped, which claimed more than 15,000 of our soldiers in 10 years in 10 years, right? we were forced to leave here not forced. it was a political decision. all decisions are political at the top yes, but not all of them are forced. finally, he took another step, which he hardly notices. today they don't talk about it. he went on he went to china before having to install a good relationship. and today's good relations between russia and china including, if his contribution. we can talk a lot about

gorbachev's foreign policy. of course, like any other person, he could be wrong. but as i said, he is already highlighting what is having an impact today on the course of history. in particular, gorbachev managed to achieve those peace treaties that today hold back the arms race, the race that can lead to destruction, much has been and is being said today in connection with the military operation. what is possible, the use of nuclear weapons for me it was so strange sounds. this is after thirty years of the use of nuclear weapons, and moreover, they said that these are nuclear weapons. it came out, an order was given to put it on combat duty. it means that there is a huge step back. what is the reason? the reason is

that relations, compared to the gorbachev era , have deteriorated sharply between the two large countries, i mean russia and the united states. well, in general, the whole west is east. this is what concerns the external now the internal policy to decipher. and why suddenly they got worse all the promises that were made by gorbachev the west did not throw out now a few words about gorbachev's domestic policy but you all probably remember, i think that your age allows you to do this how you met mikhail gorbachev who proclaimed the idea of ​​perestroika. what is the essence of this idea of ​​restructuring. it 's simple enough you don't need to write. there for that matter. he proposed to return to the leninist vision of socialism. the last years of lenin's life what is it about the transition from the military

communism. in politics, which made it possible to feed the people, take them out of civilian life, and in this respect, gorbachev took this path while being a communist. he stated that the democratization of the party was needed and put forward the idea of ​​the so-called social democratization of social democracy. as such, i also participated in his activities in the future and helped towards the end of the last century. he began to create a social democratic party. which did not exist for a long time, but the enthusiasm was a large number of people who wanted to be in this party was why he wanted it? and, because russia could not develop further without solving the problem of bureaucracy, without solving the problem of improving

people's lives and solving the problem of culture with its special wounds, which were, and so on. he eliminated these special frames, and this is also his merit. where to do the culture of the standard of living, if he prepared everything, and where the result can be, all the nineties results were not. we use these results, which he accepted. i also speak from the availability of culture and what results to interrupt me all the time, to respect we do not have universities. it's the same dialogue people are talking to each other. i don't think i'm counting lectures for you. i'm telling you, this is not all, university electrodes lecture on paper, but if this is a live dialogue, we ourselves lived at that time, we came out of gorbachev's time into the poverty of a civil war. let me still prove to the end the loss of statehood, he was greeted

differently and in the ninety-sixth year, so that everything seemed like that. i want to say about the last days that there was none. we are again with we apply the aryan vision to the analysis of actions. gorbachev and in general the entire soviet history of history, in general, history is the result of the activity of people, the result of the struggle of these people. and if we look from this point of view, we will see that by the end of the 1980s a situation had developed when three main forces had taken shape that determined the course of history. first of all, these are the so-called liberals, who were headed by yeltsin, oddly enough, being a senior dogmatist in political life and in philosophical terms. the second force, which is also showed itself at the very end, so to speak history. these were supporters of the gkchp. these were not ordinary people. it was the vice president. it was the environment.

these were the people who headed the kgb and so on, what they proposed, they offered to go back. and finally, those who were consolidated with the hunchback. this is the third, so to speak, there was strength. for what they stood for, they stood for preserving the union by reforming it for this and a referendum was held so that they would already start talking about this referendum, more than 70 percent voted for the preservation of the union unfortunately, other republics did not perceive this hell to a sufficient degree. i mean our fraternal republics of belarus and ukraine, they opposed and when the firebrand was sitting, so to speak, when yeltsin arrived and told kravchuk, putting two documents on the table , one document, this is the preservation of the union, which will be reformed by the gorbachev plan. what they agreed upon after a long debate

mountains and the second plan that he pulled out will still be written about this, then on the words of gorbachev, you sign this agreement preservation of the union reformed union kravchuk never answered. it was the head of ukraine thanks to the agreement and says, but, but we will sign such an agreement on the creation. the cis without the soviet union and within literally one day they solved this problem to use it was seriously destroyed by specific people. of course, only the cross is a clearly defined happiness of people. primekal sergeevich who started the personnel policy in the regions mediocre. and it led to wild problems that were you talking on your line,

as it was already necessary to shoot everyone, the state leader is distinguished in particular by the fact that he has a vision and knows how to assemble a team. the team in key positions should have been people not only personally devoted to gorbachev, but who was like-minded with him in 81 , golovachev had already lost the support surrounding him, so to speak, in the ninety-first year. sorry, i already lost it. here are the specifications. here, as a leader, is the fact that the bialowieza inmates from the airport reported that they had signed an agreement on destruction. union is not gorbachev. a bush yes head, so to speak american so to speak. uh, what happened from 85 to 91, what for 6 years from all the general love of support and from a country that, politely speaking, was not begging from hunger on the streets did not fall in 85

. we have turned into a country that was ready to take gorbachev out of the office. we have turned into a country where there were already bandits, where the national outskirts were on fire, where the standard of living has fallen colossally, where unemployment has already gone. it was all under the rule of gorbachev no, not only under carrying out gorbacheva it exists today now. we are talking about responsibility that was destroyed and destroyed in a peaceful way. what kind of peaceful way treaty or change the peaceful way. this is your peaceful way, these are the paratroopers in tbilisi in a peaceful way. this is when gorbachev gave the order to the guys in vilnius to take the tower, and then he refused them and the tv judges, but they are adults there by age. i know my position, where is my homeland. we talked to you this morning, of course

you expressed her about completely shooting. here your position, yes, and the position will not vote for this position. our people always vote for this position, because if well , what do you propose to do with state traitors, what do you propose to do with a traitor? well, you are the head of state. change who well, in this case, the herbs that gathered in belovezhskaya pushcha say gorbachev if the people who were in his inner circle who raised boris nikolayevich boris nikolayevich who went to belovezhskaya pushcha talked to gorbachev and said that they will simply consult on how best to reform the union, that's all, but in big politics, who pulled out boris nikolayevich, wrote the treaty, destroyed the soviet union, it was already too late. so it was before. but i remember this boris

nikolaevich who was brought in, who was raised. this is gorbachev's case. in short, i was not going to be objective. i will not yet say that, of course, not everything was possible to make gorbachev, there were many mistakes. first of all, there were mistakes. e in the implementation of the change in the status of the party of its possibility failed this do. this is also his mistake; mistakes were also connected with the activities of the prime minister. i mean ryzhkov, with whom they had very good relations, and then parted, because ryzhkov was against taking part of the money from the military sphere and throwing it on consumer goods, which our society lacked so much about the youth was not with you i agree that they wanted the military-industrial complex to be in front, but in our country they began to make pressure cookers instead of tanks, and who needed them, but they already began to do this under

yeltsin, so yes, no, let's distribute to each leonid balkin who had these ideas and who turned out to be very popular. i remember the lawyer, nothing from maslyakov, an outstanding economist, who did not find a common order, mikhail sergeevich, and like the previous project, which, so to speak, yavlinsky , were not implemented first, because, so to speak, it did not reflect real needs, and the last as they say, he already late, i mean , and who decided that the obolkin project did not reflect real needs. i say that he reflected, but it was already there. and who decided? what abalkin did not reflect education. yes, yes, you said that the first one was not resolved, because no, of course, there was the first draft. that's why i just conclude, i want to

say once again we must express, of course, condolences to everyone when we discuss this thing, and i am absolutely sure that gorbachev's time will come. we will remember not only with nostalgia, but also with the desire to change our society in such a way that everything humanistic and everything reasonable would be condemned to our country . borisovich and where was the humanistic? well we are everyone then lived, what kind of humanistic gopniks on the humanistic street? it was a completely different life, you know, now, if only i could barely restrain myself while i was listening, even if you say that your friend, who was here karen, georgievich shakhnazarov, wanted so much, expressing the words of the black lord, as best, but he was prevented or failed karen spoke about a different historical process that led to this and did not depend, on the contrary, you expressed two completely

different approaches from people, but i will tell you honestly. here i am filming ran away. i don't want to give it, yes, but i finished the korans. come on, please. why say this all the time, just now you need to say it. god forbid as you said, gorbachevism will return. god forbid , today the west, which dreams of the same weak leadership of the country, will lead to further expansion. that is why today it is very important to talk about this and about the lessons of gorbachevism, which i also met as a kid in my early twenties. we all believe. we believe the leader of the party of the head of state is colossal, because perestroika needed a competent party setup. well, you understand, uh, soft, but you understand, this is not leading. a small business or in a family, somewhere there it can do something, but ruin the family. at best, you were called to the leadership of the country, and when i read gorbachev already in the

ninety-ninth year and his lecture at the american university in turkey where he directly writes my goal was the goal of my life was the destruction of communism, which you are talking about, in the ninety- ninth year . i didn't interrupt you destruction communism - this is what i dedicated and it was my position in the party that allowed me to do this, this gives me reason to say, these are his words are not mine the words that were published in soviet russia yes, you know first of all, slovenia is in a magazine and there is no fake in it, why - something not because i personally talked. with anatoly lukyanov. so you remember dan, you remember that you need to recruit a team, remember stalin in this way. so he came to pinu and anatoly lukyanov, who wrote about it and personally told me, he personally told me densiopin, when he left, gorbachev said he was a traitor. he urged him not to disperse in any

case. this is not to go, gorbachev was forbidden along the way. entry into china he is a traitor and for me here i am talking today with my senior comrades. so i'm talking like a big zyugan, i wrote down very serious techniques. we are youth. we are access. you know, yakovlev restricted access to them well , the architect at the ruins, who wrote zyuganov then. these two words characterize everything that you just said before architect, well, ruins i wanted to, but ruined the question. no, let's go right now. how would you ask? how are you not? wait, now wait, and who didn't like this idea when they interrupted you and reformatted. i will tell you, as a young man, who today i am retelling to you. we are talking to him. he says, you understand leonid here is dante the divine comedy is not in vain the ninth circle yes

, the very last circle takes the traitors away and now, based on my logic, when i say that this person said that my goal was the collapse of communism, i used all the possibilities for this party leadership. he is a traitor, but i never told sergeevich this, which means i remember another polyakov far away. i remember the last one of the last to leave was viktor nikolaevich polyakov, who was one of my teachers. he was the general director of avtovaz and then became a minister. and here the chinese were immediately invited, and he made a candy out of the minaut worked in china, which means that, if not a betrayal, the removal of 100 members of the central committee of all ministers, the invitation of shevardnadze yakovlev bakatino, who really betrayed directly here in general, and i can continue these people who recently died recently, what is it like not a betrayal when he directly betrays and

betrays. so, uh, bookmarks are there for the american embassy. what's this? how can you know this? yes? a good man, yes, he wanted the best. well, they didn’t give him, how did they not give it to you? stalin, they didn’t give you. so you cleaned out this fifth column, otherwise it would have been in the forty-first year, you might be joking. or maybe don't joke, what should i do, what offer it to you. and if this had not been done , where would we be in the forty-first year and with this fifth column, it means that if came changes the team, he brings the team of traitors. for me, she is a team of traitors, one line of baker shevardnadze. what does it mean in the ninety-first year without anything, then the flight of the bureau is taken and given to the americans? he betrayed the interests of the people. that's what i hoped. i also thought, well, yes, yes, i'm a young graduate student. well, yes, it is necessary to change something is not interesting. there there there, i'm even one of those who choose from several candidates for avtovazim, and then they did it in order to somehow revive the organization,

joined the party. yes, there was such an upsurge, you know, at the beginning, but when the sun is now we evaluate it. this is a face. understood, not for me the role of a person who heads the state. what does he mean by weak? what does it mean he could or could not, of course, he was obliged to prevent the collapse of the country. since this country will fall into his hands. yes, now you can say, uh, statements of yours there others. well, i had another one there, for example, anatolyevich, who worked with him in stavropol when he was still the first man. he then told me in the nineties , then he talked to me and that's it. he said, well, this is a weak leader. he was weak. he came and reformed everything, reformed everything, ruined everything, now it was shit, they could do it, but you understand. and then he supported the liquidation, which was going on as a system of state power liquidating the soviet power, you can make a short pause. just very very. you said that he tried to use lenin's precepts and return to the lenins, but i want to draw your attention to the fact that one

from the main ideas of lenin it was a certain status of the party, which was de facto an order. but yes , and you say, we say lenin's formulations were even tougher than the party, that it should be party building. lenin paid the most important attention. you see, mikhail sergeevich is polite in these questions, they say he did not behave according to leninsky yes , politely, politely they say, rather less rice drove people like chaikin bondare. there it is too. andrey is his unknown. they were not heard. well , you see, he also gave friends. he gave allies to the khanakar, with whom he hugged and put him in the same cell where he was sitting under hitler in the same cell, even in the same prison, this khon or trembling or there this cheushevsky all the rest and ruzelsky. and so, and now we say russophobia. he's there millions of people who have worked. this is the most russophobia. he

destroyed the wall there in germany, and built it here in the russian world, he built it, he made all these decisions, including for friends and allies. he is a traitor, a traitor to personally friends, to please there, maybe this englishwoman or like george bush in which he was in malta baker wrote in malta when he was unexpectedly not expected. he said we will liquidate the warsaw pact. oge we can’t ask for something. it's baker talking, it's not me saying it, but germany's groupings in germany are an open field to expel people, you know, and now, when they try to tell me today, come on, yes, he's a good prehistoric process, so, uh karen yes, it 's so predetermined was not preordained please give you an example of china's much weaker whale, but it has preserved a new ridge, including the communist party here on the 20th will hold the twentieth congress. uh, october sixteenth. for example, that time, honestly, speak in order to simultaneously the

same lenin which is predetermined. here you see, generally climbed aside. father wrote alexander iii means that he has no weak will. god did not give the mind better it would be to get together. let him sit, then, well, this is not an excuse. there, nikolashka, there alexander iii decided. and here is his country put forward. and here it is for you her e for thursday. now we will agree to the fact that the yeltsin center was created. let's create gorbachev in the center. we must say these days precisely, and therefore say, that this is such a shame and such a system that we must avoid the authorities that would bring such people and ruin russia for us, which today is facing serious trials before us . and now we will, well, okay man, well, it didn’t work out. well if i found the empire must be what you say the goal of my whole life was the destruction of communism, the unbearable dictatorship over the people, precisely to

achieve. this goal. i used my position in the party in the country when yeltsin destroyed the socialist-revolutionaries, left the kremlin and some journalists. they said guesses. that i will quite right not cry, and you graduated from communism in europe as a seminar in the american color to turkey to get carried away, dawn number 24 ninety- ninth year, i will tell you this. here is my little experience shows that the purest fake, firstly, because this is not gorbachev's style well, first of all, this is my opinion. this is pure falsehood. he said, of course, but he did it, you understand the cpsu from the constitution, you do it without even talking. i'm talking about something else, but simply, of course, i never spoke this phrase. this is a completely obvious fake and source. we will not be very much for the fact that he is in a low situation. yes, i did not speak words of action. i told you the action is fake. it may be fake, but i told you

not to belittle your dad with your speech. i'm just being honest. the action that gorbachev did in order to like what kind of freedom, that's what you will do with this freedom? it is rightly said that he gave us freedom. he gave us shops not everyone can in these shops. today we are leaving an important moment millions of people. here, look, as lenin said yes, freedom, if the conscious need to live in society is impossible to be free from society, when they say they gave us freedom, they understand only the possibility of traveling, which the west is now taking away from us. well, that's why it's freedom, but when for me, when borisovich spoke with such a person about the opening. i, too. look, borisovich told you that the archives were opened, and as a result, wild lies and slander went off quite right. heroes of the soviet era were so desecrated, when

they threw our stories into the trash, they trampled on them, humiliated them, when they killed the ideology in the country, they raised a generation. the mankurts were raised to power not only by the bourgeoisie, but by those serving them. therefore, i tell you, it was easy to deceive the youth, why they still use it now, and all the rest of the attackers are privileges. that's what today the whole of barvikha is already there gave away. you are your followers, everything, then they distributed it. we also came with sincere ones, we think, well, yes, i told you to one muratov, who was there to feed komsomolskaya pravda and we came up with this experiment. but how to wake up? well, we didn’t think that all of russia in the caucasus would be washed with blood by five warriors. central asia means the baltics, maybe we forgot the nineties , when a million people left each year, who will answer for this? after all? this cannot be said. well he failed, but millions over the years passed away because they were deprived of even the savings they had accumulated, well, how does a person live, how can he

support his children? this is how i was in 2000 . ok. 90 i also have two children young wife. i left. everything avtovaz was given to a private berezovsky appeared there. well, i found myself, yes , opportunities, but these people have not found millions. they died of grief to the extent that the nineties , which your gorbachev brought, could not, and i consider him a traitor and no other word. unfortunately, i can’t find a good one for him russian traditions after all, on this day, the russian tradition, yes, in the russian tradition, but this does not concern a person , but this, well, is not a person who brought only grief to his country and specific people in the nineties - these are the years of yeltsin, but i admitted it, this boris can be allowed, whom stalin could not allow this. why did he change teams all the time? why? he, i often cite as an example a man who is a minister, he put in power. yes, guys, it’s been 30 years there, and then he

dies from a broken heart while transporting factories there beyond the urals yes because he found these people found. and this one whom shevardnadze found yakovlevakatina, means all the rest, but this betrayal picked up people to give further, to oil this smell, to get this house in west germany yes, in general this is a disgrace the same as tehat . this, too, this is also some kind of night house we gave there. here in germany so on this note that gorbachev died in moscow well, yes, that is, he wanted it to be his choice. i would like to say good things about him. i am i didn’t know him. personally, i would like to say a good word about him, but i have such words today . i just want to raise how much time we have left before the commercials. and then there are the rich, then let them finish. ah, victor alekseevich kaznacheev, who was the first secretary of the

pyatigorsk city committee, then the first secretary of the stavropol city committee, then the second secretary of the region. koma worked with mikhail sergeevich a few days later. after the appointment of mikhail sergeyevich as general secretary in the eighty-fifth year, she said in a private conversation, but all the guys from the unions, end, maximum 5 years. he was wrong for 1 year, but already in the nineties it was clear that the union, uh, was falling apart. and we are discussing the deceased, we are discussing a political figure, so it is so important to talk about this today and in all previous years it was talked about, in fact, many books have been written about gorbachev and his entourage. and those who want to understand this, of course, can do it. it is easy to do this and memoir literature. uh, exactly the people, uh, who worked with him. well , for example, leonid vadim shishibarshin wrote mayors a lot

journalists pavel voshchanov, who worked with yeltsin, but also wrote about the gorbachev era, but there is amazing historical research, for example, untimely, alexander vladimirovich ostrovsky, who left st. petersburg historian, wrote two amazing books of stupidity or treason. and who appointed gorbachev. but everything is spelled out very clearly. on a huge number of documents, alexander wrote very deeply interesting scientific, non -journalistic, non-journalistic literature. very serious. uh, historical, but a few years ago. my colleagues and i won a grant on the formation of the portal of russian civilization in the space of time and in the global context. by the way, on the eve of september 1st. this is a very uh recommendation for all teachers and students, including there was a section on statesmen of russian history from all over the historical

era. well, i had to write a review article that pretended to, uh, this part, and i ran into a big problem. uh, and that's how i formally got out of it. uh, a statesman is the leader of a country who represents it inside and out. naturally. this is the president, the prime minister, the monarch, if you like, but the substantive concept of a statesman is much more complicated, because in this sense , statesmen who do not live on short-term political tasks, but think about the strategic development of their country, their personal corporate party interests. he must leave and put above all else. uh, the preservation of the motherland of preserving it in history, that is, and a politician is a person who solves specific political problems, and an outstanding

statesman. he looks through history into the future. yes, that's exactly the strategic vision for saving their homeland, their country and people. here is the formal point of view of mikhail sergeevich, of course, this is a statesman. but the substantive point of view, he is a politician who, unfortunately, in many respects turned out to be exposed. that's the kind of, uh, petty self- interest of incompetence. why? he actually gathered around him such dullness, uh, which ivanovich said, but at the same time, it is necessary to say that, of course, gorbachev is not with all his functionality, er, that the secretary general had. that's huge leverage. after all, everything was decided. eh, the last ones, as it were, were put to the point. a compartment, and he really found himself in a situation where they destroyed destroyed. uh, the soviet union - this is a powerful layer of the soviet

nomenclature. this is part of the state security, this is shadow capital and, of course, western intelligence services in particular. and speaking of this, one of the american spies compared our late soviet society with swiss cheese, because very there were already many explorations that worked, there were more holes than the cheese itself. but i wanted to talk about something else , that is, but, of course, about something else right after a short pause, tell me. they are waiting for you there, my people, a big historical premiere. at 21:20 on the channel russia in the

game and win prizes, play summer to renew the largest bank offers a guaranteed favorable loan rate. no matter how many you are, the largest bank is waiting for you. post bank is an advertisement for the drug kagocel without exaggeration and double meanings. after all, from the first day of admission begins to reduce the severity of the symptoms of influenza and sars, regardless of the type of virus and helps to reduce the duration of the disease, therefore kagotse. the highest antiviral measure, and this is kagocel's packaging you can easily find them in a

magnet pharmacy buy cheaper spanish 99 99 more discounts in the magnet mobile application. more and more tasks require solutions, and the energy is running out . mildronate is an activator of my abilities and mental activity in order to restore energy and find strength for pleasant moments. mildronate i can do it cherkizova represents well, you say, don't, well, they are so tasty, because they are from the meat of their own farms. well , what if she is three nights later than her and you won't stop me, cherkizovo and it's so delicious to me video how much discount 1999 when buying an accessory or service on loan is important, under what conditions do banks.ru

select and help get approval? the supermarket changes the prices of chicken eggs village, green only from 69 rubles. savings banquet, favorite goods are cheaper than in a store, mildronate activator of my ability to work and mental activity mildronate i can do it here you are you say no, well, they are so delicious from the meat of ferb's own well, she's three nights later than her and you won't stop me cherkizovo. i like it so much on weekends. each of us on earth has a second half. what are you doing here? i'm here who knows a lot about you and your handsome sense to answer you well. anatoly, do you agree to marry

anastasia, she stole me in life to us instead of her on saturday and sunday at 13:00 on the channel, russia when i was elected kensek, perestroika russia was listed among the most important tasks a country that is generally sold to reforms. i think we had a pretty big desire to promote democracy. where did gorbachev come from? the steppe region to the peasantry, all generations of the working peasants. i think that the chernobyl lesson is not out of date. you see what is happening in the world and looked beyond the horizon. we managed to do a lot of selection of

interviews with mikhail gorbachev and documentaries about his era. check out the app and website. it so happened that for some time, though not for long, i worked for the foundation for about three months. gorbachev the fact is that i studied in graduate school at a super closed institute of social sciences under the central committee of the cpsu. yes, and on the basis of this institute, after the ninety-first year, a foundation was created. gorbachev did it. yes, the financial academy is located here now. it is a gigantic complex of buildings where illegal immigrants were trained, where representatives of people's democratic movements were trained, and so on, but i was imprisoned because they reformed. this structure was not planted to parse the letters that mikhail

sergeevich came to, and huge bales brought letters. we they had to not only be sorted, but also read and, uh, in by the way, hmm letters from abroad , germany occupied the first place after that, but there were quite a lot of letters from japan. apparently, this was connected with the hope for the kuril islands, and so on, and the united states of america well, the rest of eastern europe and so on are mostly laudatory; moreover, it struck me that people even invested in financial checks. we handed over these checks with signatures that they sent the money, and the other part of the letters is from the country. but here are the letters. every time i went sick just outside this room where i read the letters, because it was the scream. eh, the horror of the pain of a tear, people listed their suffering. uh, what brought gorbachev and curse natural and so on. these are two different worlds, then i felt it as a young

girl. and today i clearly understood this when i watched the news feed, how the western media recalled gorbachev and how, accordingly, they reacted in the comments in e. in patriotic families, people. in general, the moral assessment of society gorbachev endured ours a long time ago. but why did the gorbachev foundation still remember, and why did i leave from there as a result to graduate school at mgimo ? . mikhail sergeevich didn’t need it. but what struck me most was that i could n’t continue to work there, uh, on my problems, because uh, you were talking about her, a unique, in general, special library library, where all the literature, which is only a magician, goes progressively. published abroad, including magazines and so on. naturally. we went there, there on receipt

more, there all these people fly around the soviet union, which is tass and so on, including classified information, came there, and this could be read and used later dissertations to a large extent. my first dissertation was based on such materials. i come once. uh, girls down there in the basement library. he says, lena is closing, says tomorrow we will no longer issue nothing. i say, where does it move? i say maybe it's time. she says, no, we don't know at all where it will be reformed. i say that here there will be a huge library room, and here there will be a museum of gifts of mikhail sergeevich and that is, the place of chic e is super-scientific. i don’t know where she would do it afterwards, they said that she would go to the library of foreign literature or to gbl. there, for sure , half was plundered, but the main thing is that you need to create your own gift museum in such a way that you will admire. naturally,

it was impossible to continue scientific activity in these conditions. i wrote a statement of my own free will, uh, but, uh, important, uh, not just let's put it that way. yes, and my fate, but it is the fate of the country, about which we have already talked a lot here back in our time. uh, gorbachev's general secretary, my grandmother, who lived in the city of chirchik in the uzbek ussr, came, as always, to the market and in the course they flaunted a huge inscription russian pigs. get out. this is also here, uh, such personal memories of gorbachev, or uh, when we talk today about the lost, so to speak, eastern europe and the baltic states, this is also, uh, a consequence of the international policy of mikhail sergeyevich gorbachev. therefore, you need to understand that our president vladimir vladimirovich quite clearly said that this man played a colossal historical role and we are talking about in this colossal historical role. he

changed the world for sure, he changed it, but in what context? but what have we got from this? we got it today. uh, as a result of what we should finish correcting. or rather, gorbachev's mistakes due to the death of our guys during his due to the shelling of civilians and children. tomorrow , september 1, is an amazing holiday. i always start from the first class waited and still. i'm happy to. here and even. then i look forward to that day. and i'm even afraid to think what ukrokhunta can do on september 1. how can she behave in relation to children's institutions, which are located in donetsk and other settlements, which are under the control of russian troops by allied forces territories, and this, unfortunately, is also a consequence of those ill-conceived things that were done

under mikhail sergeevich, therefore, as i said, our society has long given a moral assessment of the activities of mikhail sergeevich probably it is necessary that now the authorities give a moral and legal assessment of this activity. a discussion ensued between borisovich and leonid ivanovich about whether this phrase was said. i did not find a direct video from istanbul, so to speak, but this question was asked to mikhail sergeyevich during his participation in the program vladimir vladimirovich pozner on channel one . i hope our colleagues will not be offended if we show this small fragment. my name is olga dear mikhail sergeevich, you became a member of the cpsu for 21 years and made a rapid party career and always talked about the role of the cpsu and you two went on to say that the cpsu was the initiator of perestroika, however, in 1999 at the american university in istanbul you said that the goal of all

your life they had so communism to me dictatorship over people. that's how you came to this and do you think that what happened in our country in 917 was a bloody and senseless experiment. the most important question for all of us at irkutsk university there was an election campaign. the presidential assistant professor came out and gave me a question. you said this in such and such a year. i said, you said in such and such a year, yes you did. in some year we were talking about it, so who are you. i, firstly, gorbachev this is the very first. well, your position is somehow unclear. yes, my position has changed. but tell us, you are an assistant professor, you must know you are asking a smart question very logical i respect. before the revolution, lenin also said that the

proletariat would fight for power with the help of e-democracy. and all power will govern with the help of democracy. did you say you and lenin agree with you? no, tell me, no, then tell me, why did lenin say in the twenty-first year? before or justify the need for a new economic policy. he said we made a mistake. we went the wrong way. and we need to radically change the point of view on socialism. this you will deny no. so, tell me, then now answer me. why do you allow lenin? everything? and damn it to me, it should be noted that gorbachev no thanks, no thanks, gorbachev reacted as if choosing everything that he did not say. i did

n’t say that it’s wrong, as you can see with lenin, he himself is in turkey to send him to climb there. that is, it is not indicated. that is, nikolai sergeevich did not react in the way you directly answered the question, no, the point of view changed. well, that's why he confirms what he said. fact, and everything else is a lyricist. in 1986, at a professional meeting, we have the services of the ministry of internal affairs, and a little louder, yes, i expressed my opinion that i am impressed by the actions that gorbachev is carrying out

. that he wants to compare communist power with power and sharply weaken and lower the role? it was strange beyond. but it was evident from his actions. his closest associate whom he brought is one of his people. crime corrupt bastards who are rarely found, the current the tragic position of the chest on his account. it 's because of him because of his politics. he invaded georgia in this catastrophe. everyone else is after him. journal of genius was at the head of two countries and both countries. the first soviet must be said, we are gorbachev from the very beginning. we had a

goal where to mount. soviet power. but we expected it to take 12 years. we are not to blame that everything collapsed after 6 years. but he defined the church. that is, it is not only that because he said he was happy. this is what gorbachev did and what that here the chief was confirmed calmly? i look at his activities at what he did from the outside. what is the duty of the head of state, what did he do and what are the results of the duty of the head of state of the first grove to preserve this state, protect its independence, strengthen this state. what he did? here they spoke with enthusiasm. he got better. relations with the west of detente, due to which he surrendered all the interests of the

soviet union, he did not leave a single stone unturned without even a power of attorney for him voluntarily as a gift. of course, this is how peace can be achieved. any country that surrenders, it surrendered. yes, she is hostile. he brought the soviet army to the handle. what did they do with the soviet army with officers and soldiers, leaving them hungry in the field without anything? what blow did he deal with the army? and he did not unite germany, this is a delusion. there was no unification of germany; there was the destruction of the gdr and the absorption of the gdr into the federal republic of

germany . crushed east germany and still people in east germany feel like second class people in this germany still they are despicable, donkeys. until now, in more than eight percent of the leadership positions in all companies in east germany from the west, they are not trusted. merkel is an exception, that is, and there was nothing to be done. he did not defend the interests of russia, he simply gave them away, he did not even sell them. he gave it away, threw it away, it didn't matter. he was afraid of blood, he poured blood from the soviet union. i know this, we worked in these places. we have seen what is happening there. from

tajikistan to transnistria, all the conflicts that today on the territory of the former soviet union began in his period with his devouring. when he was approached in baku tense situation? what to do, no matter he has an important conversation with margaret the wheelbarrow? and he didn’t care about people , he didn’t care about the russian people, the soviet people. their interests did not draw him, the head of the country does not care about the people. he did not believe in these people. why did he go west, he didn't believe that the people of the soviet union the people of russia in it have the strength to solve their own problems, so they gave everything to the west. you will solve our problems. how can such a person even? how can you evaluate it?

board i remember i came to the soviet union in 1988 . i was shocked. i left in sixty-nine. i could not imagine that a store in moscow could look like this, that the country was brought to starvation, who brought it? mikhail sergeevich and the army and the state, and then he says to me they came and told me. who are you ? are you the head of the country? or are you academic the professor who was told you have power or not, power he was incapable of managing. he didn't know what management was, he didn't have any ideas. except for one of my own, i am as a person. and my place on the world stage is outside of

russia, and therefore today if you look at who praises him the most, the more they are enemies of russia, the more they hate russia, the more praise, only they. none of the people who care about russia inside russia will say a good word. and the chinese comrades are right the problem is nonetheless started with his visit, because the students approved of this man's visit said, we will go outside. and the authorities will not dare to disperse us. but she didn’t listen to you, because the republic of china was more important to them. they came to offend comrade gorbachev and they brought tanks to the square and

they saved, china and at that time he gave them his advice, he, who ruined his country, came to china give them advice too. so why be surprised how with what contempt they treat him with no less than they treated some sergeevich well, there were accounts. met with gorbachev. yes, i met. i had a conversation with her for 2 hours in 1986. i came back, but i wonder if you are speaking for whose interests do you stand for? now you understand interests. who do you work for? i don't work for anyone. i work for the truth, i say, only what happened. what i saw was nothing else, born

in the city of moscow in the soviet union at an early age, realizing that being a jew he wants to live in israel after obtaining official permission from the soviet the country will leave the soviet union, who left for israel , served in the israeli army, fought valiantly. yes, those who served the structure related to secret intelligence services, onslaught, yes, the rank of our lieutenant general, who since the eighties has been actively involved in the fact that there are hot spots that arose through the fault of gorbachev , took out jews so that they would not be among the victims no at the same time is retired for a long time and expresses his point of view, which is not liked by many in israel. i like many in russia. like many in america, but in his life he earned the right to tell the truth, regardless of his

rank and statehood, so kedmi receives a pension from the state, israel, for which he fought. and he speaks the truth. on what he sees and what he knows very well. although after a conversation with him 2 hours would be today, you understand why the jews were not allowed out of the soviet union, now he scolds the communists for not letting them out, and i tell everyone, and why should normally good people who were given an education are not allowed. and why should they release them? here, on the contrary, there was a whole area pursued and driven out by the germans. there spaniards jews. those are the ones you condemn. what are you condemning? it was necessary to keep such people in the ussr, they tried, they failed, they failed. i, of course, set me to issue an apology that it took them too long to make sure that it was still better for the soviet union to give. but after

this conversation, i asked him for 2 hours. he spoke for two hours. i came to israel and they asked me, well, what was your impression, what was it? i say i i'm sorry, but i'll translate from hebrew what i said, i don't understand how such a nonentity was allowed to run an empire. how is such a person? became the head of the state narcissistic for 2 hours, he did not tell the eighty-sixth year how the people love him, as now in the elections. he will win them. how is he right? and all the time it was the speech of a narcissist. and i saw i knew great what was happening on the street. who absolutely does not understand. in what country does he live among what people does he live? what is the international position and

this man was supposed to rule the country, he did not collapse into the vyatka union. destroyed the soviet union, he did not fulfill his task. he did not complete his tasks. he didn’t save everything and all his not conception bukkat, what he said on the first day when he came to the kgb i came to ruin this organization, he told everyone. as a general and an officer, i came to destroy the security service and well, glory. god failed him. he did a lot of damage, just like schwarzen did the same. so with regard to gorbachev, according to the results and according to his actions nothing good can be said, but i want to attribute now to a completely different problem. it's coming these days. uh, the mgt delegation

already. well, he's coming. and why and why did russia call them? and why does russia need it, what result are they waiting for? it may look like russia. even though russian troops are standing there, they are helpless to solve the security problem. this is how it looks all over the world. what the rich will solve the problem, they don't speak to the public will solve the problem. of course not, so why did they bring them? why were they allowed to enter, what do they want from them? they can provide a solution. god forbid, but it's close, let's say, right? remove your troops, we 'll decide here. i'm on the spot. this will be the best

indicator of russia's helplessness even in these territories. and the last thing i want to say is about referendums. how can a referendum be held in a country without a classification? how could elections be held in germany without twelve? how can a referendum be held in any region in ukraine without holding denocification, at least two years after it begins, a referendum can be held, otherwise it is useless. you yourself said how they voted. as you voted today, so later . it is very easy to brainwash people. and those who have been brainwashed for 30+ years, especially 8 years. now you want to hold a referendum among them, and who needs it? who recognizes him?

no one and never just to be formally held. non-nazization andrey, insofar as he insists that international law is the highest rules of which the fact that our country constantly defends the position that international law is higher than between the rules that are invented in the west, therefore, of course, referendums should be held and unconditionally. so to speak, the founder is that these areas these regions will pass. under their sovereignty, whether their russian sovereignty or with the will-outpouring of the local population , they recognize it as it was done in kosovo. it is the western public or does not recognize who lives by the rules, as it is known that

the gentleman makes the rules. if he loses he rules me. it is the americans who follow us. as a matter of fact, we really don't give a damn, we're defending the right. in the end, work backwards in order to satisfy the desire of washington, london, paris, it’s already completely necessary to give a damn about it. for us, the opinion of those people who are in beijing, delhi and in other capitals of states friendly to us is now more important. therefore, i think that this should be carried out and the mission to have the devil too, because it should. or rather, of us every day, that the observation mission will assess the true situation. where do they go from anyway? i am also sure that the one who arrives there will not evaluate it that way. the task is solely to monitor compliance with the protocol. that is, they kind of see poorly, they don’t

let them out there. they are only for one day. russia has fulfilled the conditions. she showed that she has nothing to hide here and we will do it there by inviting westerners, as for gorbachev, who evaluates here, in general, the political leader is always is evaluated in the historical context to which it exists, let's try to be constant. well , let me try, because even then, in which the state turned out to be, we will talk more about this state. well, you know, such a year, yes. here is the death of mikhail sergeevich gorbachev on the one hand, yes, well, exactly in 4 months. we would have if if the soviet union had not collapsed, we would have celebrated the creation. this power on december 30 yes, imagine how right the soviet union was before this anniversary, and the fact is that it may not even be gorbachev’s fault, but gorbachev’s misfortune. i don’t

consider him a traitor; i’ll count a person who found himself in a situation where he suppressed his position, that is, not a hat, he didn’t correspond to the position he occupied. this is absolutely perfect, because they are talking about schwartz, i will not say corrupt, not corrupt, but how can foreign ministers be appointed under the most difficult conditions, when you lead turning events, a person occurs between world politics and does not know anything one foreign language of a person who has no experience of working with foreign delegations with foreign powers. how can such a person be appointed? in only one case, if you yourself take this role, that is, you are the head of state. you want to be the chief diplomat. then, probably, it is possible, but gorbachev did not have this experience, so i absolutely agree with yakov. it was capitulation in the cold war -

this is war. here, i'm constantly proving , proving. you understand the war is hot, it ends, either victory or defeat cold war. maybe without shooting, without guns , without planes, without missiles, but this is also a war. it also ends, either with victory or defeat, gorbachev led the country to defeat. he capitulated not by chance in china immediately appeared there the first headline came out after the collapse of the soviet union, the suicide of the ussr, that is, the soviet union, having the ability to resist this resistance, he actually surrendered, and that's from those agreements that you just remembered, how what kind of relationship were. between mid and the military under gorbachev, because they saw that the foreign ministry was losing these positions. he surrenders everything, and as a result, the military suffers , the country's defenses suffer, when we had an

advantage in a whole class of weapons in medium and shorter range missiles, and we just want this class to be destroyed with an advantage in our country and in the united states which did not have such an advantage and preservation gives sea-based, which we did not have, but which allowed the americans to attack our territory, given the geography of russia, what is here here is a great diplomatic, this is a victory. are you giving away what's in what? you have the advantage of moreover gorbachev yes, he was received in the west, yes, of course , margaret, e. if you give up your position just like that, then they will not talk to you about the fact that you have surrendered your position. and here we are back to you to do something good.

if you retreated, then we will speak with you from the position to which you retreated , gorbachev should have understood this, because he was a statesman. i was at that time a young teacher in the ninety-fifth year. oh, eighty-five. sorry, i began to work as a teacher at the military-political academy, lenin's department of the international workers' communist movement of international or foreigners. i had bands on one side. they were hungarians and gdrovians. and on the other me. naturally, as a mushnik was sent to the ninth faculty. this faculty is to explain to them the position of the new political thinking, when the germans and hungarians looked and say yes. or how? and it was necessary to spin, because a statement or an oath. what are they supposed to protect? this can be explained to civilians from the same yeltsin, he then headed the city committee of parties, yes, in the eighty-

fifth year. well, we, as a military-like organized public, were put on the water and put on the front rows. situations. and yeltsin said, well, yes, like this, but gorbachev could not catch on with this man either. it 's just that i feel like he wasn't that self-absorbed weak. well, or so he did not understand the country, and the fact that he did not understand the country. well , excuse me for one of the first decrees that dealt a blow, in general, to his charisma about alcohol about alcohol. yes, when a man came here, you know, like with saltykov yes, we expected bloody deeds from him, but he ate chizhik this first. here was the charismatic leader yeltsin, he even outwardly copied all 30 secretaries. he also filmed everyone. no, honestly

, alcohol, a charismatic leader came. he did not understand that his advisers did not understand that a country with vast experience with centuries of experience in moonshine jam would not find a way out. she only found sugar now, then the cigarettes disappeared, and it all hit. according to whom in power is power that can not. andrey, don't remember what it was called , this is when when the rubber glove is on yes i’ll sell yes, well, they put the mash, greetings to gorbachev, whether it’s something like that, that is, they pulled on a rubber glove and when the mash was already inflated yes, and it inflated like that. this here is this rubber glove gold. hello gorbachev when he had the first word, when he spoke, here we have thieves. yes, this is the people so to speak to him, really. we have not heard this from the high stands. i was a member of the cpsu in 1979. we never

heard it. suddenly a leader comes who speaks begins to tell the truth, naturally to him reaching out. this is an era before the historical. after that, so to speak, begins to make decrees. maybe this is a blessing. well, when this is good, then it turns into an exhaustion of power, a fall in the authority of power, it becomes so, well, from the outside it already seems that we have received another weak one. and then every time at every stage he began to confirm this. well, yes , i was in charge. excuse me. that's right. well, let 's get to kucherov in everything to wrap up. what is connected with what is connected for our people putin will artillery and fighter. that's right, that's when we saw leaders who speak the truth, speak sharply and who can fly on the fighter of the predecessors of our all leaders, starting there with brezhnev in which i saw suddenly a man comes

who can fly on a fighter, and not who barely speaks or and which yes, well, how, well, then i didn’t know it yet, it is realized with you more carefully already at a certain age. like you, i grew up with brezhnev , you can say, but they filmed, fought and fought in the car. i don't see the country. and when he was of conscious age, he said that he asked this in retirement. yes, i briefly did not participate in the content of the discussion. uh, gorbachev as a politician, but there was no such detomia from you. a good man, and therefore, not for the first time in russian history. well, it happens and lives on smaller ones. i

have been friends with gennady, eduard burbulis, mentioned here and who also passed away this summer, from the moment of his resignation and lived to the family. uh, until his last day. every year we met a lot, drank, spruce, and and so on, a wonderful person, he was an excellent friend, a caring comrade. everything for you was to do two topics that we never discussed yeltsin and the belovezhsky agreements with him, because you understood that we would immediately quarrel friendship would end. this is what i'm talking about. a good man is your friend. a very intelligent man well-read when he gets the power. and if some idea sits in his head, it often turns, remaining a good person for you, into a completely, completely different from this country. this is what needs to be understood in this case, the same fork existed. now

advertising. after that, we will continue in the new composition to thank all the guests and our colleagues who brought their paintings here and arrived themselves, the excitement reached its highest point, it was an interesting very human journey to another era. this is a provocation in a good way, to the wildest dreams new stars will be inscribed in golden letters in the history of the first cinematographer, the jury members are ready to answer the main question. who will receive the grand closing prize, 44? moscow international cinema after midnight on the channel russia meat for 89 rubles. the largest bank

offers a guaranteed favorable loan rate. does it matter where you are? who how many of you in the post office bank is waiting for you per annum guaranteed rate the largest bank post office bank children need. well , a lot for happiness rides. take advantage of childbirth benefits from the national demography project. what could be better than indian ace all the same and cariburgers taste spicy vanga chutney sauce combined with kfc specialty chicken on a kylie bun new stone milo from 69 rubles. already at kfc but they are like that

delicious meats made from farmers' own can't stop cherkizov. i'm so delicious supermarket flips the price of granny apples. smith from only 79 rubles. sberbanquet. products for school snacks are cheaper than in the store mildronate activator of my ability to work and mental activity. i can do it where can i get a basket to buy cheaper and not need school sale plus installment plan for everything technopark 8 c smartphone for 9.99 rubles. and even in installments, eldorado is all for cherkizov’s low prices, imagine, so you say no, well, they so delicious, because from the meat of their own willows. well, three nights later she ate, and you won't stop me. and it tastes so good to me. under what conditions is a

banker selected and helped to get the prices of chicken, village, green eggs from only 6? savings banquet, your favorite goods are cheaper than in the store , you are accompanied by weeds, the ax is waiting for you there, my people are a big historical premiere. give me time. elizaveta at 21:20 on the

russia channel we are ready to come on, all together, we are watching the long-awaited new season together on friday at 21:30. it's time start a new life girls premiere on saturday at 21:00.

vgtrk war correspondent yevgeny poddubny zhen is in direct contact with the studio good evening. what is happening we are worried about all the counter offensives, all the more now it is impossible to read what the ukrainian side writes, they forbade at least someone to take a step left, step to the right no military correspondents , no civilians, so that they don’t write, and we still perceive freedom and the military commander, as chroniclers of the great era. he's really the main topic now of a special military operation - these are certainly attempts to counter-offensive actions of the armed forces of ukraine both in the southern sector of the contact line and in the northern sector. and the front. let's talk about everything in order, indeed, over the past three days, the formation of the kiev regime, they are trying to go on the offensive in order

to recapture earlier. and the territories of the kherson and zaporozhye regions, they are not doing very well. although there are certain local successes, but take advantage of these local successes formation of the kyiv regime. it is unlikely that they will be able to. i will explain why. the fact is that, despite the difficult situation of the armed forces of ukraine, with the help of the countries of the north atlantic alliance, well, what is called the entire nato world, and the formation of the kiev regime managed to transfer forces and means to the south of the special military operation zone. month with the help of western high-precision missile systems, and the air strikes were carried out on the logistics lines of the russian armed forces in the south. and also, and in warehouses, fights and food are understandable it was that this was a preparation for a certain attackers. in general, perhaps this is the first such

offensive in recent history, which is still in a few months. it was announced by propagandists of the kiev regime, so , of course, there were no surprise factors. and besides, probably no one did. uh, in kiev, such an understandable tactic was not invented in kiev after but attacks on e, logistics lines e, massive artillery preparation and infantry forward with the support of tanks. well here is the area the kherson region, for example, is such that it is possible to advance along the steppe. extremely difficult without loss. and these losses appeared in the ministry of defense of the russian federation says that there are thousands of them, but the kiev regime is losing its personal composition, our estimates. well, much more modest, but at the same time , it’s clear that those battalions are tactical groups that went ahead to e, kherson and in general, but in the m-th ukrainian segment. this is loudly called the battle for kherson, but, in fact, they lost combat capability

by two. sections of the lines of combat contact units and formations of the enemy managed to organize some local success. but, most likely, this success will end with large, and even huge losses, the armed forces of ukraine were involved in an attempt to organize the coverage of part of our grouping in the northeast. and hmm, this is the southern zone a and as a result, they actually got into the fire bag now with a massive fire damage by artillery weapons of the armed forces of ukraine, but in fact, parts of the formation of the ukrainian army were under heavy fire and that they will do in this sense further is not clear. well, they took lozovoe there, they took a few more settlements. further than holguin, they did not advance even a volga, for example, units of the formation of the russian army for three days, but they are defending this line. coverage failed

. it is clear that he can not sleep in the forehead in the armed forces of ukraine and the battle of kherson although it is still too early to let down. the results can turn into another defeat with grave consequences, with tragic consequences for the personnel. although the kiev regime - this circumstance does not stop examples enough since 2014, at the same time, well, there is such a version that supposedly all the actions of the formation of the kiev regime in the south are such a distracting maneuver that is very expensive, and in order to prepare for an offensive in the kharkov region , by the way, the formation of the kiev regime is also there regimes were able to concentrate certain forces, according to our data, up to two battalions of tactical groups with the support of tanks of units. but even there, the formation of the regime is already suffering losses as a result of fire damage to the russian army. tactics. there

is also understandable. this is the use of artillery, and the hymars for striking at the rear. and after that, an attempt to attack with armored vehicles with infantry support on foot, but there are three circumstances that prevent the ukrainian army from acting effectively here volodya is such a circumstance that western military advisers are, well, good theorists, but do not take into account ukrainian reality. the fact is that the armed forces of ukraine do not have enough, neither tactical training nor the quality of combat control, in order to implement those plans that western curators have outlined, while absolutely variegated armored vehicles and wheeled and tracked vehicles mixed with soviet equipment, which ukraine got after the collapse of the soviet union, western weapons systems are modern, which are naturally difficult to repair. and in general, all this logistics is complex western

-made artillery, which is difficult to maintain and deliver. nato supplies are extremely difficult to the front line. in general, all these circumstances make attempts at a counteroffensive truly suicidal, and, well, kiev still enjoys the fact that they managed to block the information space and data on losses for all months, that for these special military operations the dead are carefully hidden, and are recorded as missing. well, by doing so, they are trying to maintain some stability in the deeply affected ukrainian society. but, in fact, against the background of these counter-offensive actions, the situation in the donbass faded into the background. although fierce fighting continues here, as before, in the bakhmut region, and in the donetsk region there our other groups are working in the donetsk region. but here. it is known that success is developing, which was ensured by the release of sand near donetsk

and units and formations of the first corps. the people's republic, with the support of the allied artillery forces in the first place, but move forward slowly, hard, but move forward, developing success towards pervomaisky in marinka. the fighting continues . well, in general, these attempts at counter -offensive actions became possible. and i mean counter-offensive attempts the enemy became possible, because the formation of the kiev regime with the support of western countries managed to hold back and reduce the rate of advance hmm russian forces and forces, and i mean the allied corps of donetsk and lugansk here in the donbass because, and it’s clear that a the kiev regime did everything, possibly covered himself with civilian mines. uh, the sandy residential areas were organized by the heroes of the points in the residential areas e where people are not evacuated only in order to

restrain the pace of the offensive in the donbass in order to try, that is, to organize, well pr bloody pr on the counter-offensive in the south and possibly on the territory of khmm kharkiv region, in general, the main thing is that it is clear and 3 days after the start, and the onset of the formation of the kiev regime. this is what the original plan of the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine. well, we mean that the plan of the western advisers. it is torn down, loaded forces. they failed to take advantage not of the surprise factor, but could not take advantage of it, but of the fact that they concentrated reserves in order to fulfill at least the initial tasks of the counteroffensive were stopped, they suffer huge losses and, in fact, are stuck

. well, at least such conclusions. make i zhenya thank you very much brilliant in -depth analysis. well, of course, it’s exciting, but war is a matter for serious men tass men are very serious you heard yevgeny poddubny karasu and the pride of the correspondent of the military correspondent corps brilliant schools vgtrk michal borisovich develops the theme. uh, what's going on at the fronts? i spoke to our experts. they say that it's good that they kind of flooded, because they finally got up, finally went and now they are dragging them in and were very worried that they would not be able to drag them into fire bags. now they seem to be immersed in them and there really are those videos that appear. well, they understand it terribly. you know, they have been interrogating me for the past few days, different ones from different channels, you are different people. well, i say you understand, it’s very good that this happened, because in fact now these are the few and so

lacking means of defeating armored vehicles from it. everything else. they themselves deliver to recycling sites, so the longer it lasts, the better. but it's really amazing here, without going into fantasy. what goals were pursued by the kiev regime, because, and there are no surprise factors to speak of, this offensive is known and prepared for it, indeed. there the second month almost 2 months. uh, acute disadvantage. e firepower from the enemy, who admits that he is eight nine times 10 times ours. it was repeatedly understood that during the attack on kherson in the steppes. this will be the basis of the main factor in the remedy for his defeat. they use the means of his defeat. he is now a cowshed bombed in the kursk region, according to the colony. they hit in makeyevka. diesel, before that, in the 90th colony in kherson for the civilian sector of private development in nova kakhovka that is, it turns out they don’t have enough of their funds, but

they use them for other purposes, thank you. god great to them. thank you but now the trouble is happening that is happening to such a hand from an incomprehensible place, growing specialists, having started hostilities, starting some kind of operation, they do not have the courage of political will or simply the brains to stop it, making sure during the first day that goals are not something that is not achieved. they can not be reached, because advancing for a dry rate of 5-6 km, followed by a retreat almost to the starting positions, is, well, by no means a success. instead don't throw all new new reinforcements. here, before leaving, i looked here, again, their information and foreign information, again two battalion groups of infantry and about 20 more tanks were thrown at sukhoi rates. despite the fact that in the morning they lost everything from 12 tanks in the same direction. everything has already been shot. so the fact of the matter is, the enemies are forced to say that the russians are still

easily spending 20 to 40,000 every day. i mean, this is not great. that is, it turns out that now they have no air in the air. well, according to my estimates, there are already 10% of the available armored vehicles. there destroyed in less than three in 60 hours. aircraft, well, somewhere around 20-25 percent of those that are still able to take to the air, if a few more days have passed the disposal of those fighters who prepared nato members for them. some of the nato fighters are there, according to our ministry of defense. here , god knows, probably, well, at least i see, they are beautifully equipped. here they are, they have skills, at least actions in groups. well, too, well, the fact that they operate in the steppe, but here . forgive me already, what is given is given, then there separate mountain assault brigade. it's absolutely certain she's being beaten right now. but this is already the elite, which has been running around in the donbass for only 8 years, that is, they are really hitting the best part and knocking out the

equipment that well, look, now something like 200 armored vehicles have been destroyed. yes , poland delivered the only one of all countries 232 tanks, and this is the heaviest weapon that was delivered by all the rest together. taken almost all deliveries from probably i'm sure that tomorrow this figure will be surpassed. that is, here is the volume the work that they themselves brought to us on a silver platter, and you will lose it, they really need to be picked up. the pace of systems on the shoulders take away the hope that the personnel will let down enough in order to go forward on the shoulders of the enemy. i looked at all sorts of odessa sites and so on, well, it’s just a disaster, that is, they say we don’t have to wait for watermelons in kherson but the ambulance, one by one, at the same time, the ambulance donating blood there in all yours is really a colossal loss, but he said that

how many 100 people. yes, they lost everything. it 's generally darker in the beginning, something like that, that is, for now. and the main thing is that the westerners, given that they haven't started. in such cases, they sometimes have mad tantrums in support. it means that something is not going according to plan. well, i looked at the maps published by western sources. they are very careful. and except for a little progress. in the sense they don’t talk about anything, this such an advance looks like a drag in the fire target. you don't just show. well, in these directions to ten directions on the entire front. here they tried to attack, they have local successes, they are called settlements, all this surprised me that there were sound voices, because she elena berlog said that she didn’t care how the german voters felt about it. and the main thing is that she promised the ukrainians and she is in front of them, that is, it’s clear that ukraine’s foreign affairs were being prepared for linberg if ukraine’s interests are much more important than germany . well,

high-ranking representatives. i ’ll say it again now, they’re offended by me, i’ll say this to the german armed forces and who said that in general you need to understand who we are dealing with and so that you don’t think the russian armies are very powerful it may well work on two fronts. if necessary, it is clear that they understand that they misunderstood something not about our army, and they greatly overestimated something. but although what they shot before, here is tucker carlson asking questions. i think it's brilliant. and here is what the inspector general of the bundeswehr general said a large number russian ground forces, may be tied to ukraine at the moment. but even if so, we should not underestimate the potential of the russian ground forces to open the second theater of operations. he also added that most of the russian fleet. it has not yet been involved in ukraine, and the air force has significant potential, which poses a threat even to us, in addition, speaking of the

shortcomings of the russian army. i blamed the huge one. stockpiles of weapons take into account read the german general, russia is quite capable of expanding conflict. and so kirk carlson asks a great question. well, where and what do we supply? according to the statement, the incident stocks of weapons. where did they go, they were sent corrupted into ukrainian.