uh, this was the first step they planned to take, but naturally. uh, taking into account the fact that russian citizens practically no longer work in the un secretariat. it's been a secretary for a long time. it is filled with anyone, but not our representatives. this also allows them. uh, completely uh manipulate uh, various actions do not provide visas do not provide invitations on time and so on and so forth. well, we’ll just put it together that , unfortunately, our minister of foreign affairs cannot get to session of the assembly well, it wasn't conceivable before, when it was originally conceived to blame the family nations i believe that i support what a country that is so to speak. e bombarded hiroshima energy. asaki could not allow this party to host such a serious organization on its territory. and when we dig a little and find out that the land was provided by the rockefeller. well

, this also gives us some questions. with regard to the current situation remains voluminous nations then, of course, the americans are extremely interested in reforming it in such a way that it would be convenient for them to continue to turn their affairs of interest only to them. and the fact that the united nations was already invented to replace the united nations was invented by a summit of democracy. this also inspires us with certain thoughts that he cannot suit the americans in the current form. therefore, it is possible that organizations will be organized after some period of time . can expect the same situation that happened to the light nation, when it simply ceased to exist, because that big war. oh well, as far as the americans are concerned. eh, then naturally, we see that during the first world war in the second world war, in that period of time when all of europe was at war, the americans were able to drag, as they say, nuts from the fire, to them. it

was also beneficial that now this european security crisis has occurred on the territory of ukraine, of course, it is artificial, man-made, because it has been planned for a long time. it was planned for a long time, if earlier in doctrinal documents and nato and uh, american uh, a little so to speak, it was hidden that whoever is a strategic adversary, now, of course, a reflection of the fact that the americans and nato countries are planning to inflict a strategic defeat on russia. it hasn't been hidden for a long time. this is their primary goal. they are guided by this, why are they guided by this? well, because, of course, we also read the scientific literature, where it was told that russia has too many minerals and all sorts of other interesting things that it should share with. and therefore, of course, in this situation, the americans have long

wanted in one way or another in some way. e with russia to enter into such a crisis crisis period. when to try to somehow apply. uh, serious damage to our country. well, naturally, over the past 8 years , such an anti-koso anti-russia has been created on the territory of ukraine, a place where the americans could well turn around and wage a covert struggle against our country, and the fact that only under the biden administration was a $ 15 billion worth of weapons supplied, the united the states of america, these are also numbers, which will agree on something that we are not at war with ukraine, but with the collective west, in particular with the state ones. it is obvious. returning to information work. i would like to say just a few words at the eastern economic forum, and there, on one of the panels, maria zakharova, well-known to us, was present, and there they were very

seriously discussing this issue that it is necessary to devote serious phenomena to information work, because in such conditions that we are now without her absolutely impossible. and i think that, m-m, we were shown blinkin's statement in relation to russia and so on. i consider this statement by blinkin as an attempt to deprive the russian people and its individual representatives of faith in themselves, faith in their country, faith in their army. but i think that this is a completely groundless statement and does not have any basis , i am sure that our grandfathers, who in the forty-first year, according to various calculations, passed along the red. and they went to the front, even then in that terrible situation. they we believed in ourselves and did not lose hope that victory would be ours. andrei, but i have a slightly different approach to the united nations,

which i now understand, as i understand it, was a report. as a matter of fact, linda thomas greenfield yes, who put forward six principles, which, in fact , is now being discussed that the united states intends to reform the united nations, i would not agree that it was created, how and when it was created. here is such a plan for the americans, uh, in order to to subjugate uh to destroy russia is not, the americans always have a plan to enter into the construction of the world that they see, i did not say that they were planning and now it’s not about you. now. i'm not talking about you here dmitry said that they immediately had the idea to destroy russia yes, such ideas, at least in the thirty-ninth year. they didn't in 1942, when roosevel came up with this idea of ​​four cops, on which he based this idea. ah, grounds. jonah - this is four policemen divided. good the united states just ended up there, uh,

even geographically, as a quarter overseer. i'm not saying that it was impossible not to place 2/3 of the world's gold reserves of 45% of industry on the territory of the united states. right now the united states is the highest contributor to un funding of about 12 billion. yes, they are paying china is paying. despite the fact that it is considered the first economy in the world, it pays only two. no already 12 is already 12:2. yes, russia 500 million. yes, russia pecit 500 million. i approximately think that with greenfield because it does not change until the proportion is changed. they were to be discussed at the baseon. they didn't change everything for the united states. in principle, both reform issues. it was staged in the forty-fifth year almost one reformulil. this is the sixty-third resolution of 1991. but when was the composition expanded? permanent members from 11 to 15 and more, such a democratization was introduced,

when the regions themselves could already now regional organizations appoint member states, because until the sixty-third year, usually members from a certain group was chosen by agreement. this is the five permanent members of the un. that is, it has never been a democratic organization. it was aimed at leading the world. a definite different thing that this leadership did not work out is that the united states ignited the cold war and decided that in this cold war they would defeat the soviet union. this changed, turned it from a platform from a world government in quotation marks into a platform for sorting out the first 30 branches that were taken out. this there was a soviet veto on the decision, you understand now greenfield again says 29 years after the ninety-first year, what does this mean? and he says to me difficulties of russian diplomacy, we do not put forward questions that they would vibrate

, you know, yellow vests are speaking in france. listen. let's bring it to the security council to consider the brutality of the french police against citizens. well, they are bringing the issue of xinjiang on human rights. let's introduce human rights in france as they are respected in the twentieth year. at we had about 20 reasons to ask the americans what they were doing, what was going on in american cities. we also do not introduce this, proceeding from the fact that we recognize that diplomacy still exists, if we have diplomacy, if we defend the principles of international law, i will answer with a marguerite. why don't we fight? there is a principle of laws and rules of war, fixed in the hague geneva conferences and conventions, if we comply with them, then hitting infrastructure facilities is, if possible , prohibited. that is, avoid as much as possible. strikes on cultural heritage sites of educational

institutions. well, in hospitals, roads and so on. andrei anato knows about this, but she rejects this. this she rejects. now she rejects the law of the international they say, this is the rule guys. here is the rule we mean one thing for me , we, and we gave an oath of international law to this international law. well, the only thing that i'm sorry, please, let's work out the rules. i'm just saying that either we recognize that the current international the right not to work. and we constantly say it doesn't work, the united states breaks the rules. rules this means it is a synonym for a synonym for american law, in fact the american rules, because the extraterritorial principle. i beg your pardon, the marshall plan, the main principle of its action of extraterritoriality is not the jurisdiction of the american administration in local courts, this principle of extraterritoriality is still being applied. and now this is being

transformed in the rules, but in the last few weeks, literally here is the middle of august, and i'm seeing a very interesting thing and thomas greenfield er, the woman captures the idea correctly. she says, and we protect mustafon. that is, we protect. ah, international law. maybe it's only now that the americans are moving on. well, now it will pass. uh, haute couture week, yeah hmm well so the general assembly here it's going to be held in a diplomat over there and they'll drop it again, but for now at least they insist on defending the principles in the mouth. here is the territorial integrity sovereignty peace security. that's what she laid it down. she beautifully said no, no side, which of course you did not violate, that is, which there are no claims, but now the type is enough. well, that's the point. she is now bringing in the united states of american diplomacy here and there, you understand,

on the one hand. they perfectly understand one thing. volodya in the global south, the rules do not apply. they would like to be based on the law they understand perfectly well, that's why it is beneficial at the moment, of course, dory instantly forget what happened 2 seconds ago in rhetoric and the concept of law appeared again the concept of these six principles that they bring in agreed, they are now playing an ingenious combination. i said about this, that they understand that the moon, theoretically, in terms of strength and in conventional weapons, has an advantage over russia. well, it’s just that we have one investment resource in terms of quantity, so everyone came out completely clear what they are doing now . yes, they really are fighting in ukraine with practically everything that they already have, including and manpower, called mercenaries, realizing that, well, we will not use strategic weapons, like, well, no, no, they think so,

they think. well, they will, after all, the russians said there are red lines, a red line, a red line, but they did it at the end. we are now this one, the ukrainian cretin declares that rammstein said that everything is everything that is possible, we will put the question to you. is it possible to be afraid of nothing, we will try to destroy russia, that is, the americans, purely clearly play their game. well, therefore it is necessary to break, the united states to break for the united states is always playing on the move, of course, we know how to move. we have a checker, forward, checker back, you understand, as a rule, because in the big game, so to speak, well, russia has never played. we are a continental power. we simply cannot play such a big multi-way game because of our geographical position, the united states is a sea power that has been for a long time. and even now, if we are excluded from the equation, they are generally safe in essence, because now there is no other power, except

russia that could destroy them, so the americans always play multi-move. now he says there is such a power, and next to him is comrade kim, who is also and now we are. let's listen to comrades after the thirtieth year about russian diplomacy. well, we remember that before covid 19, the president had an initiative to constantly gather members of the un and discuss such current issues that we are worried about. why why is it all the time there is no president , if the diplomatic bodies are listening. yellow vests are suffering in france, this question could have been raised and the americans would have imposed branches in the fact that you just had to get together and talk. why not? you understand? andrey, you just need to understand. eh, it means that now i said that, in

principle, it was just some kind of flaw. yes, that is, according to our circumstances. naturally, because these guys, of course, agree that they don’t want russians in that. naturally, yes, they do not want to understand? here i am again, how not to. here's how to simplify it. yes, there is a lifesaver, and we, damn it, don’t use them, and so his vanka probably, the moving stove herself, from this it’s insulting to understand that we don’t use sticks as a doctor. wait very late. you already spoke. you have appealed to me. well, i owe ben. i'm quiet. you understand what's the matter. you understand what the matter is the right of the century in the event that the majority is for the majority, but after the collapse of the soviet camp , these security forces are for the majority

. i have majority rights. wait listen after the collapse of the soviet camp, the russian federation has, uh, permanently in the un security council, in addition to regular clients , a dozen more non-permanently, 15. you see, you even know better than me, therefore the majority. such fickle evil is almost always on the side of the americans after the collapse of the soviet camp, therefore, he does not need to use the right of veto. well, let's be here, if we're talking about something, let's talk seriously. that's the point. into a deeper question, let's talk seriously. now the united states is waging a rightful struggle for commonality. no, you are in the idea. the main thing is that the right of the century be proved at the general assembly that i said trinidad and

tabaga and all the rest, this comrade, like a caribbean one, she will decide, but justified or unreasonable. yes. and if we listen to china , it also made it repeatedly. here are any warnings, the whole history of chinese helpers. no, it helped. well, everything, time was given to stop. no, created pressure economic pressure different. at first it was political, they achieved that the people's republic of china took the place of the republic of china, and before that, until the year 79, i remind you i was sitting there. i sat, the republic, china taiwan , that is, therefore, the chinese, as when all the time they indicated their position everywhere everywhere and always it was very important from the point of view of the french got around the city. here it is thanks to its here it here it was everything here it was. here

you understand that these are different things that work here, when he announced. here exhibited exhibited. yes , he presented himself as a diplomatic opponent of the west and, in general, hegemotic powers, by the way, including the soviet union in the sixties . he thereby took his position or presented himself as the leader of the third world that is, as the leader of the developing countries, let me remind you that in 2010 china considered, perhaps, lying down to correct me a major emerging power. yes, and received assistance from the european union and from european states , you understand, because precisely because china always the asterisk was incorrectly drawn on the flag at the olympics. here's a note for you, because our flag can't be said that way. and we said, well, okay, god was wrong with him. well, yes, well, it's still not

important. andrei, in principle, as you say, a multi-move. here they have been supporting japan since 1990 of the last century against us, when we were at war with them, they questioned, and then japan fired at them with the same weapon, germany , this is a lot, as it also led to. well, it's true that 9/11 is no coincidence either, but listen to the question. another question is not in them the question is with us. and why do we expect from those that they will be our friends. let 's get out of the cis fighting from the inside, for this the un is not afraid at all, we are the majority. i recently fight, look there is the cis now, when we end the twenty-sixth year on february 6th. yes , in my opinion, there is not much time left for negotiations. we do not carry out this contract. it will close on its own in four years. why should we still

give the americans a reason to accuse us of being the whole structure. they should be afraid of us. they should not after blame your wanted, came out and so afraid, if only if they were not afraid, international politicians fought with symbols. nato would have fought in ukraine if they were not afraid, well , firstly, they are not afraid of us. nothing of us, not afraid. today they were afraid of us, they would not substitute in such a quantity and perhaps given equipment and everything else and their specialists. they are just not afraid of us, they should not be afraid of a naked under their own flag. why under your own flag? they howl calculated precisely easily for themselves. why should they take risks with yourself? they love operations on other people's

inputs. now they have a whole country, which, including the canoe, does not declare. we never sent our soldiers there , that's right, because it means under the flag of a star-strip car. i say it means they're doing a false flag operation where they send them anyway. they are called a mercenary there. a wild amount, there are black waters, past academies and all the other things are few. it is there that quite well-known media faces, former commentators, come out. they are sent there to send someone back to grobavka and whom there in plastic bags, but many were lit up. now they are joyfully shouting, and moama hivmiamu and everything else. i never knew that the main language in ukraine is now english, at least for the armed forces. well, so don't fool yourself. they perfectly understand what the americans are doing. they are fighting on all fronts. they are not afraid of us. but we need to make sure that they realize that they are afraid, otherwise they struck. why why? 'cause if

they understand they can try now solve the problem in other ways. why would he theoretically risk himself? this is not called fear, but calculation no, this is called button accordion. no, nothing like that, they clearly coldly consider what they are doing now. they are all blows - it's just that they solve for themselves the issues of the economic competitor of europe, they destroy them, they close the slavic issue for themselves, watching how the slavs kill each other. they understand very clearly what they are doing. therefore, we also need to understand their plans well and, based on this, build our advertising. horn a few days big historical premiere power should be concentrated in the hands of our lord with you his

advice to become absolutely power over you i don’t promise to help you in everything elizabeth continue watching tomorrow at 21:20 on the russia channel modern painkillers with a maximum concentration of arthroxicam for accelerated penetration into the eyes of pain is a great way to teach a child financial literacy. free tinkoff junio card. get a tinkoff junior card and we will help your child with the first financial matters. tinkoff he is the only one buy a magnet in stores, get a coupon for your next purchase. look at the check and catch the discount for more discounts in the mobile application. diclofenac accas magnet in a package with a man contains a maximum concentration of the active substance of 5%. 5% gel. diclofenac alternative

quality patriotic own accrue important purchases at today's prices and turn back all your plans. bright autumn, sports style and energetic mood all this is a new collection of casual clothes and shoes from adidas at wildberries . dolgit in yellow packaging german quality at an affordable price. who are you? how many of you are

waiting for a loan in the post bank, in cash at only 5.5% per annum guaranteed, the rate of the post bank is all together the long-awaited new season. dmitry malikov discovered a new star. she was absolutely confident in herself at 21:30. this is our new head coach this season, you're not be the team captain. mikhail porechenkov

on the channel russia is competent when first withdrawing soldiers at first

it never happened when you were still president their number of a certain level, and then we had to follow many guidelines that they do not follow the first thing they had to do billions of dollars . this should not happen to anyone. we left we had to keep the gods chatting away from the chinese nuclear power plant where they produce nuclear weapons. we shouldn't have lost it, but we did. that is he bluntly admitted on indian television that they used the base gram to track china and for the possibility of military related to this fact, yes, well, i understand what he was talking about, probably, and yagd-objects in

the desert. this is a kolbakan, where the actual nuclear test site is chinese and the hour is to have, probably, flying hours after all, and not driving along the road, but it is obvious that china, uh, the americans are very worried . i would go, frankly, on the other hand, just here in the eastern economic the forum that we talked about and the speech that was very interesting after the russian president put forward the eastern leaders spoke in accordance with the jamshu of the chairman of the chinese people's congress and e, in all speeches and in the speech of the chinese representative and, accordingly, india e, malaysia and so on, one very few interesting things have come up that you need to pay attention to, which is what we've been talking about today, the countries have been talking about the most. about myself, not about the russian situations, because it must be clearly understood, because they are most concerned about. and what will happen to us, but all do not react very painfully. uh, because that's what is now reaching us to

people in the eastern consciousness. i had over there that went east, frankly, more than a century ago. we have never been under colonial dependence for real, and many countries have been under it for decades, and china strictly speaking, uh, there is more than 150 years, if you take, if even 760 years, almost before the end. uh up forty-ninth year 1.149. and these countries understand that when 800 is 1860. here the ending sounded 900 they yes, yes. yes, i understand that that is the opium wars, but the founding of the prc from which they say, for example, china had to pay various indemnities until 1956. you would not be there , including the soviet union, to stop all this, but all these countries and malaysia and indonesia, china and so on. they understand perfectly well what foreign control over your e finances is, she customs over life over

everyone and they could not get out from under it, if not for the events that took place after the second world war. this is clear. and uh, those countries got a vote. won, in fact, including strange, not the most powerful from an economic point of view, and it turned out that to the end with this voice. i took advantage of something and can not. well, because money plays the main role. and so china began a very long race to create its economic e-subjectivity. and these countries, initially these countries, i mean now, from large china to, for example, the same e sri lankans or m-m myanmar, someone was successful, someone was unsuccessful, but they took the race for e, the creation of their independence and world processes in writing, but they were not given this to the end and that's why they understand that is happening with russia because they initially these countries

began to take the course of the national revival in the nineties in russia about the national revival in general, no one said there was such a thought . note. we had the main idea to fit into the west and become the same as uh, like like her and the west, roughly speaking, and when would we start to cut out from there. this is a very painful process. after all, now we have, in fact, some kind of birth trauma, birth pains and they perceive it in the same way. these are some of our eastern neighbors. that this is a dispute between representatives of western civilization. russia a western country quarreled with the same western guys, it’s hard to say which of them is right, but when it suddenly turned out that russia began to correctly formulate its meanings, that we are not howling the west. we do not howl from culture, as such, we give out with certain manifestations, including, for example, the russian president, in response to questions on the forum , heard such a word there.