ten is located under the kutuzov yauza, laid under the moskva river, crosses a complex communication junction, the filevskaya line, the metro and other engineering networks, if earlier gas pipes were pulled directly along the river bottom, now specialists are laying a new line under the reservoir itself, using a small tunneling shield, while gas supply to residents continues even during operation. all news is always available on the media platform. what are the main messages for this hour maria sittel thank you for your attention see you in the next issue.

hello this is a program who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio dmitry kulikov a terrible tragedy in izhevsk 13 dead 21, the victim of the identity of the terrorist criminal was established he committed suicide there are significant signs that he was an adherent of neo-nazism, and was also registered in a neuropsychiatric dispensary an investigation is underway. we express our deepest condolences to the relatives of those killed and injured in italy in the parliamentary elections , the right-wing coalition won. apparently the head of government will be the leader of the rights of george melodies, the parties of berlusconi and salvini are also participating in the coalition the eu bureaucracy is frightened, really frightened that the hungarian prime minister urban will have italian allies with close and similar views, the fourth day of voting is underway for him in the donetsk and luhansk

people's republics of kherson and zaporozhye regions, voter activity is high according to this morning, the turnout in each of the referendums exceeds 50%, in the republics it significantly exceeds these same 50%. yesterday i voted in my in his native city of shakhtyorsk in the donetsk e, republic, he communicated with fellow countrymen. everyone who voted for the people's build. well, it's just iron people. it is impossible to convey and retell in words all that energy and everything, the depth of understanding of the situation that comes from them, but we will talk about this today. in the case of a meeting of the president in russia, belarus, issues of security and strengthening economic cooperation are discussed, and in new york, the week of high representation has ended, where she was at the samba productive for the delegation led by

minister of foreign affairs sergei lavrov we do not refuse contacts even when appropriate proposals are received. we agree. although our partners will quietly meet, so that no one knows about it, please, because it is always better to speak than not to speak, but in the situation that we are now russia well, it simply will not take any first steps. everything was destroyed back in 2014, when the european union stopped all contacts, destroyed, branched the architecture of our relations with the european union. well, please, we conveyed to them, when you are interested in something, please contact us if we are interested in this. let's see, the americans treat europe, you know, how there was a phrase

that ukrainian nationalists began to pronounce a long time ago ukraine with europe the americans, in my opinion, want to put forward another slogan europe tse, ukraine if they apply there, we will see, we will we will not contact him. we made a conclusion for ourselves. they are absolutely not negotiable. they are selfish to the core. they think only about themselves and they will not observe the balance of interests about their own interests and will not even look for it. well, in my opinion, a very accurate conclusion, of course, we are talking about the contract capabilities of the western countries, primarily american ones, but it is clear that the europeans are taken into account in this position in the same way. yes, what is europe c ukraine in the sense that and how i understand it. in the sense that europe

has completely come under the control of the resurrected american dependence. well, let's see, by the way, what will happen in italy huh? what do you want to start. yes, yes, from italy, because indeed today this is the hottest news for europe for the european commission for the leaders of the european union, this is, well, i would say a shock, but this is such an expected shock, because as the results predicted, that by a large margin will win right-wing coalition right-centrist, and it turned out 44. yes. there is also a mixed system there. yes, the system is in place, what is most important is that they are gaining by a wide margin . more than 50 percent there both in the senate and in lower tent of parliament. that is, they will be the three you listed. uh, hmm abyte new government. and here's something interesting. i just want to draw the attention of our viewers that a few days before the elections, ursula von der lein did an absolutely unthinkable unprecedented thing,

that is, she interfered in the electoral process of one of the states of the european union. well, it would be some kind of hungary, which is already almost considered an outcast there. still. this is a small rookie country. but this is a whole waist, one of the three key economies and one of the six states founded at one time. here the united europe then called the trade union with it in a different way and nevertheless. and at the words , fonderland makes a statement that if he comes to power in fact, when he clearly hints at this particular government. we have leverage, influence through financial structures and so on. well, it’s impossible with italy, in fact, and we will see that the consequences will be inevitable one of the consequences is that, together with hungary, and also poland, they will have a blocking stake in to all questions in fact, and these are problems if i choose editors simply, and here is the video where the

melody is. uh talks about right-wing conservative values ​​it is. we will now show you up to the maximum ends. so about the right values. this is more of a problem for europe, because it’s already let him shoot collectively decides for us what is important here, that two out of three parties are included, and in this coalition, well, it is customary to consider if they are not friends there, if you don’t overestimate, everything still, still berlusconia nevertheless, salvini associate close personal relations with putin. after the fourteenth year he moved to russia in a t-shirt. creep was photographed here, in general, i think that there is a chance that it is through one of the key countries of the european union that the dialogue about the absence that lavrov spoke about the absence of will be activated if there are any proposals from the italians. it seems to me that in moscow they could be favored now in the new configuration. higher to serve is a question of subjectivity. yes, how these proposals

will be subjective? i’ll just quote from memory the laurel one that he said that there are different delegations of countries there that want to mediate somehow, and there sergey viktorovich had a question. and you are going to discuss america's position in relation to this, because it is clear that ukraine is not subjectively outside the position of america, but all mediation efforts are absolutely pointless. and this is a very correct statement of the question, because we are what we see both in the negotiation process and in the broadly understood process of communication, which would be very needed, but the problem is that there are no subjects. well, no one to talk to. well , by the way. one more fragment. e, i ’ll show lavrov now, but we ’ll show this story later about the values ​​of the melody, too, because it’s essential e sergey viktorovich it’s extremely clear to any unbiased observer for the anglo-saxons, who completely subjugated europe, ukraine is only a consumable

in the fight against russia nato declared our country a direct threat to the total dominance of the united states a as a long-term strategic challenge has defined the people's republic of china in the us their allies do not give freedom to anyone, elections, they threaten and twist their arms. everyone who dares to think for himself is demanded by threats to join the anti-russian sanctions. they are good at it. they are not good at it, but it is obvious that the actions of this kind of the united states of their satellites are not democracy at all. a pure dictatorship. at least an attempt to impose a dictatorship. i beg you, sergei viktorovich said that they are selfish and they only think about your interests. i think the problem is deeper. they don't even follow their own interests. interest, only one america gives europe to the slaughter and that's it. all those who, so to speak, the republic of the post-soviet space in order to achieve their goals

in confronting russia from china i am very sad that europe does not see this. well, europe does not see it. yes, although, by the way, i noticed on friday . i have been published. even research. from the same rent, yes, which is right here on the points of corporations. uh, in the twenty-first year described that the main goals yes, well, it is clear that the main enemy. uh, russia is the main target of the robbery. this is europe yes you. well, naturally. i want to start with a word of condolences to close relatives, and those killed as a result of the izhevsk tract, but what about political news? well, perhaps the clearest or most harsh echoes and , in fact, sedan and meetings at the un and uh, hmm negotiations, as far as the american side said the negotiations are secret uh with the russian federation uh, they said that negotiations are going through phones have been very resuming phone calls

between russia and the us er lately. and here is blinkin, for example, but he spoke publicly about this. so we are set to phrase it, we are set so that this war does not expand. well, let's see, blinkin. that's about the negotiations. you, as always, use the wrong words there , if literally about maintaining contacts along the line of connected e, with a possible e with a possible hmm escalation in honor of nuclear weapons. well, let's, damn it, then we'll see, that is, i agree, we heard a lot about the irresponsible rhetoric from vladimir putin is interesting when he heard it. however, we are focused on making sure that we all act responsibly, especially with regard to this empty rhetoric. we have been very frank with the russians public in private to stop it after talking about nuclear weapons. gennadier interacts with the kremlin on the

threat of nuclear war in private. yes, it is very important that moscow hears from us and knows that the consequences will be horrendous, and we informed them. it's very clear. that's interesting, yes, and here was that phrase of the armor, the expansion of the conflict, it simply did not enter. i confirm that's interesting, interesting, here, uh, the head of the e foreign ministry. yes says what? well, what putin said by the way, today the foreign ministry once again. i changed. yes, no threats. so, uh, our policy regarding nuclear deterrence has not changed in any way. here, as it is written in the doctrine, so it exists, but i'm talking about something else. and, by the way, about threats. that's who's threatening right here it's one question mark and second, of course, when the head of a non-united states says that the president of russia has an empty rhetoric. this is the first and yes, and the second. here the consequences will be catastrophic. well, let's create a question, but

for the united states and for europe, they will be so uplifting, you know. uh, dear presenter here in ukraine and zelensky commented on this. yes, many comment on ukraine and not only. binkin and salivan and in general, the position on the use of tactical nuclear weapons by russia, never said this, look. here, this is very important point, how do you arrange it all? may i say my opinion? here i am a participant in many programs and analyzes others. i have never heard, but never i have not heard such things, but i can finish now i read from dmitry anatolyevich medvedev where he spoke in a telegram channel not just tactical, but also strategic. yes, wait, here i am, in general, i have give me time. yes, others say i can

read the quote for you exactly, please, like this, and on the nineteenth of february of this year, the russian the federation conducted an exercise conducted a strategic deterrence exercise approximately where the hyper missiles were used. uh, sound from ships from submarines and so on. it was teaching. it was a public exercise, just about the use of strategic e -missiles in the event of an attack, and i understand this, russia showed russia is conducting, but for some reason the united states and ukraine have the impression that we either don’t want to hear it or don’t want to understand it, considering that russia will definitely e, throw a nuclear bomb on the territory ukraine, that is, you understand, that is, not in russia, i have not heard. i have not heard of others, and not only that, when it comes to strategic. uh, god forbid, conflicts and application, so this could be the european union, this could be the

united states of america, and it seems to me that this is where such rhetoric comes from - fear or perhaps not the readiness of the united states to counteract in a wrong way, it seems they simply cannot imagine what russia can do to them somehow. so they keep trying. well, at least rhetorically say that ukraine is under threat. and here it is, uh, the whole picture is obtained in this way in ukraine, it is sold in such a way that russia will attack us. and who will protect us and blinkin finishes his speech saying we have a plan. we have a plan and we will win, it is we who will not allow russia to win this conflict. well , you know, some such thing is not doskannost. uh, or lies on this topic. it puts even more incomprehensible the situation of people in ukraine in general, because people are already scared and so frightened, and now still. and they are told almost every day

that russia is about to use tactical nuclear weapons on the territory. yes , dmitry anatolyevich and after the president's speech. and he said, as he understands, it means that new territories will enter. as part of russia 's defense of those territories, it will mean not only further quoting not only mobilization capabilities, but also any russian weapons, including strategic nuclear weapons and weapons based on new principles. end of quote. this is what was said. wait, but nothing contradicts. even now i'll show you a laurel, which says the same thing, but not even dmitry anatolyevich we have together. e, lavrov it’s clear, uh, the minister of foreign affairs in relation to the territory fully operates our institutions for the territories and the doctrine of nuclear war on the territory of dmitry, we don’t even know yet, for example, the city of zaporozhye uh, which we will now include in their number. you have already asked questions. i didn't have any answers either. i have heard

such statements. well, we've clarified it to be, understandably. well, how will it be? well, i ’ll show you lavrov about the territory, by the way, you see , my question was also different. not a word about the use of tactical nuclear weapons in relation to ukraine, i have been asking for about 18 years and you too. e, maxim well, this phrase has nothing to do with it at all, which you quoted. and i 'm talking about something else in the west, hysteria is winding. they fight in poduchi and say that russia has already announced announced. everyone needs to prepare and there will be something terrible, because russia has gathered launch a tactical nuclear strike on ukraine, yes. speculation is built on this. well, yes. uh, you know, i actually like your dialogue. i'm listening carefully, he says, you can tell me, maxim can say, putin spoke. yes, of course, i will now quote dmitry anatolyevich no, i did not say putin rodion do not need

a second. i asked vaslu a question about which of the responsible persons. yes, we have not so many in russia threatened ukraine with tactical nuclear weapons. here the driver told no one and maxi said that there was no i remember, maybe close, i said, dmitry anatolyevich, i'll check. here's for the record. it looked just like that, go on well for streamed. so in the protocol we note that in no way contradicts the doctrine of russia, which speaks for its own defense of its territory. when will it be if there is a threat, we will use all the opportunities available to us, that is, here is the key idea, yes, that is, to protect ourselves, how we will not be limited in anything. this is what was said about this. it is written this is declared, no matter how they scare anyone by saying this, they simply state it, because you will get hit on the head with the guys, yes, that is, and we won’t figure it out what but, therefore, in this case here. and you know, this statement that is now being made, damn it, it is very dangerous, very dangerous for one simple reason, because

this step by step technology, it is very characteristic of an american. they began to say, that is, first we will put pressure economically, when we form the first portion of sanctions, then the second portion then, and so you know this. and then there will be a war, yes, that is, they say, and then now the war is not such a war. it is now already a war, first there, and small aviation is not enough. missiles are not enough. yes, that is, you, and now a nuclear war. yes, that is, they go according to plan. they go step by step, continuing to pump up the pump up the situation, and they are already sharing another aid package of 450-7.5 million dollars for work in law enforcement agencies allocating law enforcement agencies in ukraine, you saw them now, i am in this, but we will discuss the possibility there is a state there is no state, therefore, here is half a billion for what to maintain the supposedly ukrainian police. go on, you know. this is allegedly the ukrainian police. she had been reforged a long, long time ago. but

now, uh, all these units, like, a la, carp and if, yes, that is, they now all serve in the police in the national guard and the americans support them it is on them. will go now. it is they who are engaged in mobilization . it is they who are violent. civilizations you noticed yes, that is, as soon as in russia they started talking about partial mobilization. ukraine immediately forgot about its own, it also forgot that people were already simply packed, but azov would finance it in all sorts of thousands. yes? yes, no, wait a second. vasya means, but what is the national guard of ukraine? well, there is the happiness of law enforcement officers. it will be law enforcement agencies that will finance such stupid questions, that is, the united states financed, that is, at first you hid in the form of a grant. first of all grants they finance freedom, and he, and so on, all sorts of riffraff, which began to rock ukraine against yes, that is, now they have raised them. they brought them to power. they imposed this ideology, then they legalized all this and

then they continue to finance. they continue to fund. you understand that, and that is, there is no ukraine, there is a kind of clot in which now there is a nationalist formation formed by western-funded ukraine in which you lived, in which i lived it. no, yes i today some appendage of the west which is completely on the content and fulfills all any will of the dirtiest, most insignificant vile that the west wishes, believe me, tell me what they cannot do and they will do it tomorrow. if the americans point out for this, where did a talk to valentin bogdanova, the chief of the bureau in new york, valentin bogdanova, about this whole story with nuclear weapons today on the morning air, and i asked him a question. eh, it was just discussed, eh, but do they draw parallels? well in the media american there or on television, somewhere parallels between the caribbean crisis and what is happening now. but, well, that is, because i read a lot well. it was interesting about this,

then the american society was very involved, that is, it was really frightened by this prospect. there and so on and public opinion, and r- valentin e, confirmed this, of course, played a very large role in making final decisions. still, there was really public opinion, and this fear was there. and now so he told me that here, maybe in some special ones. yes, somewhere there, they are designed for some kind of elite public that is involved in politics there and in international affairs. it slipped somewhere, but nowhere absolutely in the mass media in the wide, but such public ones. uh, no one talks about it and above all. uh, apparently, they don’t say this so that just this public opinion of this fear does not exist, because uh, by the way, about the absence of fear. uh, they say, and that it's scary they say, including uh in western europe uh, and among politicians and so on they say that

this lack of fear is in fact. well, it would not be paradoxical to study this in this case. uh, this is a very dangerous thing, because what now can stop, yes, the escalation. just fear, it seems, uh, the feeling is not very good, frankly speaking, but in this case, fear somehow feels self-preservation, or something, which is gradually squeezed out in relation to nuclear weapons. eh, they really became about him talk about a possible nuclear collision. here are such, uh, very serious, powers in the most important powers. the one from the point of view of possession of nuclear weapons began to say, well, sort of, a hike, and of course, this is very dangerous. yes. uh, as far as i understand, the discussion about the use of non-use of nuclear weapons in the current conditions, this is more another attempt to scare russia with rabid russians, who, uh, in the morning, launch a

nuclear missile in an unknown direction because glinkin said. how sorry, sorry. you continue now. this is a very important question. almost everyone was affected. and what is it? yes? at first, we basically recorded that there were no instructions from the russian side, not that there were no threats. yes, here, read the doctrine, everything is written there. if you get to this point of view on this point. well, all the forces and means will be involved, it was just quoted. maybe in a little different words, so to speak, what was said in the doctrine. at the same time, we have a fact, hysterics and zelensky, therefore about, by the way, here's how he mumbled. give this western correspondent an interview. here there threaten tactical methods with weapons fact one quote, threats. it’s not here,

somewhere over 300 m. . by the way, mind you, one more thing is interesting and asks, but what are you, and we have plan a and plan b but i will explain to you, we yes, i will give it to you i won't say there is a plan a and a plan b. here russia will expect a catastrophe in this case. well, this is a typical policy of demonization, uh, of the russian side by the uh american political community. well, who joined them, respectively, as european satellites and returning, er, to the beginning of our conversation, and this is a change in the political structure in italy and a bold statement by the hungarian foreign minister, who said that hungary is a sovereign power. by the way, he was the only one who met with russian minister lavrov in the fields. actually. here i read literally before going on the air. uh, hungary decided to hold something similar to the plebis here, yes, that is, a massive opinion survey with a consultation consultation mode.

i understand the news was literal. i just didn't get deep enough. it is e to look e in relation to- how does the hungarian population view the further imposition of sanctions against russia? how was he called an autocrat? yes, semi-democracy is somehow incomprehensible, here the autocrat urban addresses the population and so it was written that there would be a large consultation poll in hungary regarding. how should the hungarian government act in relation to the russian and the elections and polls are honest here is such a population. that's how it's set up. see how it sounds? yes, thanks for finding me. it was hungary, the first in europe, to launch national consultations to find out the opinion of citizens, and the eu sanctions against russia were announced by orban, speaking at a meeting of parliament. now i can just

call it a car, but the mayor of budapest presents opposition, that is, the elections are fair and he won, honestly parliamentary. well, such is hungary yes, but in europe he called him an autocrat and some kind of half-assed. he writes an example of double standards within brussels itself, the hungarians, a truly absolutely democratic state, moreover, a state that has, uh, the courage to openly declare important political problems and openly call a spade a spade and for good reason. uh, so excited was ursova vonderland that italy could follow? well, in quotation marks durnov. uh, for example, hungary tried. well let's call a spade a spade to intervene in the entrance of the elections in italy in what before? she constantly reproached whom moscow has a whole think tanks. there, in european reasonable cities, where they say that russia interfered in almost the entire european elections , some topics of european officials were corrupted and so on, but here, well, there is obvious pressure and a clear

division of european society into, relatively speaking, autocats from brussels which is essentially an atlantist atride, i.e. torn off from their nation-states and a movement of sovereignties gaining momentum. it personifies both viktor orban and the new government of italy and the alternative for germany and the national movement in france, that is, here, in fact, the division of the entire european, not only the political class, but the whole society into two camps, the atlanticists, who have lost their kinship, and these europeans, who are trying to live all- the same policy of common sense, which often runs parallel to the national interests of those pro-russian. eh, let's say so supposedly there are movements that exist in europe, but they are primarily about national viktor orban. he cannot be fully called a pro-russian politician, but he acts pro-hungarian politics from a position of common sense, and in this his interests, the interests of russia, converge. well, maxim started with this, just the vanderlein court, this is the most important thing. why is it interesting? is there a court there? well, here

's something else, yes, but the wind is not not a treaty, but the european union there exactly the opposite is written in the contract, the european commission has no right. all the more her chairman to speak out by choice in nation states. well, this is just a violation of this basic agreement, but no one here in our program paid attention to yoshin. there in europe, no one paid attention to it at all. no, in private publics there are in newspapers. some of them are not so big. here is something outrageous in the legal sphere. silence, not a single politician noticed this absolutely stated. well, marie lipen. yes, but she belongs to a different camp, yes, i am maxim yes, but i didn’t want to say so much, okay, so gii he said very interestingly about the caribbean crisis, that's what i now very often think about him too. you know, the situation was better during the caribbean crisis, because the parties were determined

to reach an agreement, firstly, and now i am not sure that the americans want to agree on the second side, despite the fact that they did not tolerate each other ideologically , they set the goal of destroying the enemy. that is , they understood that the competition between the two systems would go on for more than one decade, but how did it end? we know, but then, in general, there was no goal for either the soviet union to destroy the united states, not for the united states, given the soviet union and now in the west in plain text. in general, they say that the goal of this russia is to destroy the current government. there are regimes and so on you don’t understand that no one has ever tried to destroy. and not nuclear, but nuclear. yes, they didn’t try, therefore, they were able to destroy it, there was no nuclear one. and if it were in general, of course, you can try, but this is such a russian roulette, it can work out. i don't know, maybe it will work out, maybe at some point it will work out avoid nuclear war. they will squeeze us economically, and what if it doesn't work out. whether it's

worth the risk or not. and here again. i am gay. i will support. all hope. now, for fear of a sense of self-preservation, so that people would just think themselves coldly poured into his soul to say, wait, wait, now one of the british even said that we are looking for it in ukraine for the sake of which we are pushing to russia yes, they are crazy we do not understand their logic, but for them it is a matter of survival. and for us, they still do not believe in maxim you understand, they are as long as they are i why here, well , blinky's statement. yes, this is a statement of an absolutely irresponsible uh, a person of a person who does not understand what this pr-technological uh is talking about. whose head? is that his entire quote? well, sullivan is different, right? he at least well language, well picked up to this, let's see, it's very important what we're discussing. let's take a look at the sava. we perceive. this is serious. this is not the first time that president putin has made

nuclear threats in this conflict. he started shake the nuclear cards in february when russian tanks crossed the border for the first time, but that didn't stop us from handing over $ 15 billion worth of weapons to ukraine that helped them defend their country. this will not stop us and now we have directly and privately conveyed to the russians at a very high level that the consequences for russia will be catastrophic if it uses nuclear weapons in ukraine, we have been frankly stressed with them that the united states will give a decisive response together with our allies and partners. they understand what to face if to continue moving along this dark path, we marked the russians. what will be the consequences, but we are careful how we talk about it publicly, because we want to indicate that this will have astronomical consequences, but not to fight the russians understand our position. we understand our position. we have a plan for every eventuality, and we will do what is necessary to

prevent such a move by russia, in which case we will respond decisively. i think that they should have been in ukraine. listen to this, you understand, this is a different rhetoric. i absolutely agree with you, but because sulliman says, yes, we speak privately, but we are very careful about what we say privately and state publicly. this means that the dialogue is going on, you understand, there are no dialogues, there and further. he says, we understand, russian understand- this is speech, sound, sound speech. if you know, you didn’t do what you did, there, right in ukraine , it turned out that you didn’t notice, or you pretend that you didn’t notice. look here. dima, i wanted to, well, answer my question. they made an appearance. it was said we we will do something terrible, but in a way that does not get into a fight. it was said in plain text so, uh, what i wanted to hear. i literally phrase, as a citizen of ukraine, tsar ivan , or better biden, comes out and says, we will do everything

in order to stop the war on the territory of ukraine, everything is already starting to be done. here is something like this or a similar statement that we will stop we will do. we are probably on our way. we want to end the war. this is what they want. although not only me. although to hear all ukrainians. and they talk about others things completely different. well, of course, nothing has changed, for them, he and maxim, look, maxim said an important thing, now they took it and hung it up like this ukraine hung it up. this is how they telepath us in a suspended state. they say, we like that you are in trouble in this ukraine, many people like it. let there be something else, we will make it worse, but still you will be either in a mobile state or in a worse state. this is what many people in ukraine like in russia, you know, but i would do nothing here. eh, didn't expect it. maxim correctly said after zagygia, because they lost their sense of reality. yes and that's how they should share these feelings. yes, what

should be. because, well, zelensky yells, this is bluff blinkin pouts his lips and also says that well, this is bluff, this is empty rhetoric. we will not listen to the empty rhetoric of the president of russia sullivan began by saying that we take this as yes, a serious matter. at least one person at least said this, but at the same time i don’t know what he decides there. this dream and how much they really perceive. what is it like a serious matter, because before you start negotiations. the other side should be distributing this as a serious matter. i was talking about this on friday about the former commander of the ohots, who said, well, i don't know. well, this is something they ask him in this company. and if russia strikes with tactical weapons. it was like he started himself, self-starting. yes, he says, well, then we will hit the black sea fleet. well, this is very powerful. that's what to spin in kiev from morning till night. but in

kiev, what the arrestovich said that it would be necessary, well, 5 1/2 million, put under arms and i listen to him and think, well, there is, when how can i tell you? i agree, i don’t want to speak badly, but the leader of ukraine has some brains today. well, how can you say that he has the brains of all the students makes him have brains. so he made a contract. he considers it profitable and in accordance with a lucrative contract. he is doing his job. he said what the blinkin expected from him, for example, we heard the words that the blinken salla said, but we always emphasized. let's watch on business very quietly passed information in congress three three congressmen. i can say the name is chris murphy gregor, the remix and jason crow is from connectiku new york from colorado they took the initiative now and definitely. they aim until nov. the midterm elections will push through the idea of ​​supplying long-range weapons, long-range artillery mounts, which is

very important here, so to speak. the fact is that in this situation, these weapons are long-range. they can carry tactical nuclear weapons. here are the cases for you from here. all this howling about tactical weapons. and i want to say how bingolin man was an absolutely misleading translation of putin's words in all the quotes that were given the ending. uh, so i'm not bluffing - no one said. here is what we said and what, by the way, maxim has now given the data in response. what will we use, if we use, this is not there. this is an outright lie on the one hand. these are the things that are here now. and this is exactly the same plan. hey which they will they will supply tactical weapons. at least they can do it and let's remember. at first, we only make material support, no weapons, the next step does not give anything. suddenly the first artillery mounts appeared, then suddenly we have tanks. that's gradually gradually here, where i correctly said gradually gradually enters. and here it is, the stop of this

bus is a tactical weapon, which is theoretically. i do not want to speculate on this now, but it may be, if there is an installation, it means there will be tactical weapons in ukraine well, then we all know perfectly well what will be in response and whether there will be ukraine after this europe and europe by the way, yes. sasha gentlemen, here i am, in fact , absolutely rightly noted, we all say they teach, i teach the consciousness that, well, war and war, war is life in war in war. this can be done in a war, which means, but you can, that is, they smoothly let down the same critical nuclear weapons there, understanding, moreover, that is, the powers, as if in your head, but we won’t be behind a puddle, that if there is a war, then it is there, well, somewhere in ukraine, somewhere in the belgorod voronezh region. and where is it in the donbas? well, not the usa. no, you don't think there will be anything in the usa . well , if anything, we will help her, we will definitely, we will give her money, we will give her. let's give the arms the right line

touched the knife at the end of last week. they said they are americans, in my opinion, and this biden said, rightly said that there is a threat to europe yes, not to america. here is ukraine and for europe there is a threat, he says, therefore, but for america they don’t have everything calm. look, this is the key point that we forget in this studio. that is, we understand, we keep it, as it were , in ourselves, but we don’t mention it. but in the caribbean crisis there was a little bit, a different situation. rockets were in cuba . rockets in cuba were just such clubs. they could now strike directly at the united states. not for the gasket in the form of ukraine. yes, they don’t feel sorry for the laying of the second gasket in the form of poland, they also didn’t feel sorry for the money. you go there all of europe destroy. together we will earn. yes, that's it, only they are americans, that is, they only hurt when they are pinched for soft spots, only when they have then the price per gallon has increased here. same support for biden, went down. this is what they feel, there they feel the price for the price of their favorite yogurt, and they feel the war in ukraine

flow like rivers of blood. they don't feel bad either. they didn't want to fuck. we'll break before the commercial, just after it, we'll continue. hiv is transmitted through blood through drug use, i know more about unprotected sex, but the speeder on the russia channel

tastes good. for each three chrysan trekrezan promotes the treatment of acute respiratory viral infections, strengthens the immune system and restores strength trekrezan. be healthy on the citylink website or application thousands of different products at competitive prices set of dishes with a discount of 7.400 rubles. and the children need a set of knives as a gift. well , very much for happiness rides are an amazing discovery. take advantage of payments at the birth of a child as part of the national demography project.

complement and reinforce each other and only one capsule per day maximum for your microflora. and that means immunity. come on come on can you be from the team this week of bigfest is dedicated to those for whom they chose how to conduct team building. now you choose grant or chicken premier for only 99 rubles. only in the application it is tasty and the point is more cheaper, buy more than three yogurts and get a 10% discount. this is an advertisement for the drug kagocel without exaggeration and double meanings. after all, from the first day of taking it, it begins to reduce the severity of the symptoms of influenza and sars, regardless of the type of virus and helps to reduce the duration of the disease, therefore kagocel is the highest antiviral measure. and this kagocel packaging you easily. you can find them at the pharmacy. with new appliances, a 30% discount on the second or

50% discount on the third item of household appliances. do not miss the video or eldorado or at the supermarket checkouts a super prize of 100 million rubles. and what's going on banks.ru draws up osago with a benefit of up to 74% oh, don't oversleep from me brings benefits. in each order, products are cheaper than in the store up to 60% off purchases from your favorite stores order profitable.

i love you yevgeny tkachuk yevgeny brik i saw rubin today he said that he loves me, you will try to kill me, you know, in the camp many times. it didn't work out. what is there on saturday and sunday on channel russia belongs to me woman these

people tell today 16:30 on channel russia this is the program who is against on channel russia 1 we continue our discussion. we touched on the referendum. i would like us to talk about this separately, maybe we also talked about this, but sergei viktorovich lavrov was asked about the territory and application of the russian concept of protecting their territories. that's what sergei viktorovich said the entire territory of the russian federation, which

is fixed. and it can additionally be enshrined in the constitution of the russian federation, of course , is under the full protection of the state. it is absolutely. naturally, all the laws of the doctrine of the concept of strategy of the russian federation apply to its entire territory. i have not heard that the united states is already threatened with some kind of blow. i heard president biden say that in the case of holding referendums and e, the adoption of their results, russia is waiting for some next sanctions and tasks or from somewhere else. and if such a threatening thesis was put forward that russia would inevitably receive a blow, but i would just familiarize myself with this text. i was not aware that the united states and ukraine are already allies, connected

by such, but in general, a dangerous chain. well, it’s interesting, yes, how minister lavrov acts with his experience with everything else. as i understand it, there was a question that america was ready to strike, but sergey viktorovich, let's go. i'll read it myself first i will evaluate what exactly was said, and then, depending on this, i will react. there is no one of this level, who would work like this in a public in a public status at a press conference. this is max to what you touched. yes? here, well, the question of responsibility is he and subjectivity. he's the key now. but the same pancake, but about the referendum, as it was instead of a meeting, you can’t change it with your tongue , that it sweeps the pomelon. look at our business. yes, yes, these so-called elections are a fit, period. they invade appoint a puppet government local authorities then proceed to vote, which they will manipulate anyway to try to declare the territory russian no, they are not, they will

never be recognized as such, and the ukrainians have every right to take these territories and back. we are doing everything we can to help ukrainians defend themselves we are doing everything we can to rally other countries to put pressure on russia we are also committed to ensuring that this war does not expand or develop further. do you understand? it's like a jesuit saying it all, yeah ukraine has every right to fight, and we will support it in all this, but you will try so that it does not expand, by the way, where to washington d.c. i went, well, with the electoral members of the electoral commission, simply through the blocks, through the houses, through the entrances to the apartments. well, they recognize their voice there. as soon as i speak. oh quiet. i ca n't talk at all, as soon as i talk. and that means people are still coming to the venues. i have

there were several communication sessions. you know people like that, they don't just vote. well, that is, come hello. yes, of course they will vote for the bird . they are directly a member of the election commission who enter apartments, and i hear from the site that everyone has a justification. why does he make this choice, they put these birds and they say blinks. there, the coffin was seen in white slippers along with zelensky, and there everything is point by point from the fourteenth year, including those people who talk about what kind of relationship the everything, because blinkies, of course, can not recognize anything. and i saw. well, several dozen people, like this, in order to be guaranteed to say which ones for sure, and at the moment when they put a tick over them in the yard, they are deaf and talk all the time, all the time, roll out. yes, i also spoke today with the

observer from germany, by the way, guy. uh, i was talking to him. he was in donetsk and outside the window all the time at that time there was booze there and he even drew my attention that like this passes this, passes this vote. you know, what else i paid attention to is the resolution a little bit to the side. although it's all there, er, there in politics in the publication. uh, there was a very curious article by the ex-leader. e will scout the us department of defense e such david sheth, and he wrote. it's called psychological warfare against russia, which means he's got some very interesting stuff in there. so, he directly says that it is necessary to continue to rock russia, which means it is necessary and most importantly - it is to demoralize. uh, citizens of russia and to force compliance with the united states and it is necessary to make a very big bet on this, he says. uh, because that's what it should be, and there's some very interesting stuff in there. so, there, firstly, he says that you need a sense of pride. and it

’s an interesting project for the people, because these people still have, uh, such memories of the ussr as a great power, and they need to be told that russia is no longer the ussr, that it is an outcast, that it is a weak country, and so on. this in itself is curious. e what is it? here they are such a goal before they put themselves, the second is to kindle an interethnic role. we talked about this a lot, and this is a goal that has not changed since the time of the russian empire. here it has always been against the russian empire against the soviet union now it is against russia it has always existed and, er, it means, but here it is already necessary to inspire us as a minority. yes, this is decolonization. yes, what they write, what they are, that they are oppressed by the russians. and by the way, here it is. uh, if you look at social networks now, there and so on. there that it is necessary to introduce such a mantra about what emobilizes, mainly small nations, and what, thereby? so, it means, uh, that there are many victims

among them and that this is such a policy to destroy the small peoples of russia. if you look at what is happening now in social networks. here they are exactly for this grandfather. that is, he actually, this is not what he says about what should be done, he talks about what he has been doing for a long time. look, it's very important. this is touched on this, by the way, on friday about this too spoke. yes? here, look, in general, how the world has changed in public, a powerful magazine. well, they are not some kind of garbage dump of politics. yes, the responsible figure comes out talking about the psychological war against russia, then he openly talks, by the way, he does not say that there are facts. well, by the way, what nationalities are counted? he does not say there are facts, calculations that there are not. he just says we need to inspire convince to contribute.

make you think so, yeah, it's, well, discussed publicly openly. the second under this is also what you say, i just want to make it clear. well, yes, of course, if you are on a social network, then there is a huge number, which means that suddenly emerged pop-up telegram channels. here are those who work exactly on this agenda. yes, there would be for our population and people who are fond of politics and following all this networks to take an article from a politician and put it here so that it lies before their eyes. and after that, just open telegram and start watching all sorts of telegram channels. and just to conduct such a laboratory work. how is it performed order of the chief in the same pants? yes, here is the ex-head of military intelligence, the ex-head, military intelligence specialists. by the way, this is their responsibility. this is what they do. yes, just to understand. this entire psychological war is being waged by military intelligence, that is, from the other side. i have e

as a continuation, firstly, everything that is written here in this article is one to one. uh, as if reprinting or quoting the law about converted peoples sawed, 86-90, to which you already once said everything that is said here for the destruction of the soviet union , incitement of interethnic hatred was also used, the instillation by the people of central asia there, the baltic states, owed ukraine to the transcaucasus, that for centuries, supposedly russians oppressed, broke into their e, which means supposedly independent territories. roads were built there, civilization was built, and so on. uh, same thing, dulles' plan doesn't exist. for some reason he acts like a doctor to joke some political scientists. here is my proposal. here, for example, to lead there, i don’t know there in the senior classes, information lessons security. the first nazi plan ost further pl-86-90 further. this article is all. here is one to one. here's one figure is absolutely great. yes, i agree with that. well, you understand, in order to introduce such lessons at school, we first had to introduce such lessons. uh, in pedagogical universities and

, uh, mass teacher training courses, when all these teachers, who at the age could now listen to a second, just understand, i want people to understand all this, we need to lead. well, enter, check the next box must be entered. for this, i say once again to conduct the corresponding course of special universities, the second is necessary for all teachers through the retraining system. so that those who are working now go through this system of retraining with this. and for this it is necessary that there are people who will first lecture to these teachers. and that there were courses and explanations. all this is what is needed. and here is the checkbox. look, there’s definitely no need to check the box, because now they’ll announce to carry out

such very ones, they’ll all tick the boxes, and we’ll like worked out. now, if we're discussing this, let's discuss it seriously, because the ex-chief of intelligence says we've been waging psychological warfare and will continue to wage the goal is destruction, we want you to start cutting each other inside. but you know. the question is what do people actually think somewhere. yes, you are embellishing it and the teachers will think that we are embellishing it, but the problem is this, but this is the problem of the notorious, so to speak, this one, well, a new war, such that those who are being killed do not know part of it has already been cut off. and he hasn't even i noticed that some vital part had already been cut off from him, so you are saying everything correctly . i agree with you. well, you just need the volume of the situation and an understanding of the complexity of this

situation, otherwise, again, tick the box every time, so to speak, the idea that we will use these tactical weapons at a time when their associates, as i said, on the contrary, are lobbying for long-range artillery, which capable of delivering tactical nuclear weapons, in this case what was just given as an example about technological warfare. we are spoken against are accused again are we really just this fact in south korea now the speech of the president. that they support america's efforts in relations with china and against taiwan is an unprecedented statement by the koreans. it is clear where south korea is being led now to confrontation. if china sees that it will be the same there, and i'm not talking now. tell me about the lecture, we need to start. i think it’s very show and the order of our defense committee during the second world war has come, and the preservation of small peoples is the forty-first year, when the enemy was here in khimki. stalin signs this order that they were not to be taken there, only

volunteers were taken, then. yes, i think it will be informative to some extent. well, it’s really clear they are, propaganda is built, you need to carefully study all this and in order to fight it you must not substitute, because when they say to demoralize, through the fact that there is no pride in the state for years for the state arises at the moment when it is clearly functions, especially at such a critical moment and when there are incomprehensible excesses of the very feeling there, military registration and enlistment offices and so on. it is not for nothing that margarita simonyan reacts to this and collects such cases, everything must be clear according to the law, the president and shoigu said 300,000. it should be 300.000. they said those who served should be those who served, they should not be students. it shouldn't be. there are 63-year-old men. there were some such cases, in this case we will respect the state if it keeps its own promises. it seems to me that now we need to give priority attention to this

national republics. yes, firstly, as it were, well, it absolutely must be an even, absolutely identical relationship. yes, the law is one for all and by no means. well, that is, there should not even be any hints that behind this there may be some kind of ethnic component, in general, and close. this is the first. secondly, i agree with you, because , uh, yes, the fact is perverted actions. well, from the old one. according to the word , there are definitely excesses of stupidity or tyranny, and i, by the way, this time in relation to margarita and vladimir solovyov, there are still journalists, military correspondents made such. well, in social networks, that means, well, channels in which you can receive, how work is being done. she is public. that is, these are people who are responsible for this with their names and surnames, they are the author's situation. it's great the way it is. this is already

close to him, the people who write and address are by no means anonymous. it should be a person, well, to report the facts, to sign that he is responsible for this data and so on. next comes the verification. after that it works like, well, there margaret for example. all verified cases from her channel go directly to the first deputy minister of defense, and work on these is already underway with him. yes, there are facts to the contrary. yes, today i read it incorrectly, called up in yakutia , in my opinion, 120 people returned. yes, this is normal , very correct work without anonymous letters. without hysteria, examining each case, because yes , there is personal dishonesty, there is foolishness itself and you also need to understand that in your history since the forty- fifth year with such activities you have never encountered. this also needs to be understood, we will learn nothing and with the participation of a normal civil

society we will learn faster. naturally, in ukraine , a referendum adopted was perceived negatively, extremely negatively, the ukrainian government and the ukrainian authorities adopted changes in criminal law for participation in referendums provided for significant periods. and well, and here it is literally before the air. i read that ukraine's own security has already opened criminal cases, if in plain language against the leaders of the cec and luhansk donetsk secretaries, well, further, that is will pursue and uh, you know, it's on the one hand. i understand that the ukrainian government reacts this way, but on the other hand. i'm not me, i still don't understand, because to scare the people, the persecution, that live there. well, you know this is this is some. well, it's some kind of caliber. well, stupid. i'm sorry, because

that's not how it works. here instead of protecting people instead of well at least helping them. well, the lord zelensky turned. uh, not only well, let's say to the voters to the people who live there, so that they don't voted in general. i just know, here's how to tell you, formally. i understand what our ukrainian government is doing. but this is real. it does not work at all and will not work, and only scares people away. well, and, finally, i will tell my point of view personally, as a person, i congratulate those people who found the courage to vote, they voluntarily voted for them to live better. i am sincerely happy for them about voluntariness, there can be no doubt at all. well, i didn't have them. well , simply because i saw both there and then in my native miner. you understand, there, it would still be necessary to create difficulties so that these people would not be allowed to vote. this. well, if there

was another, so to speak, problem with this whole thing, well, well, you understand, you say, formally, i really don’t know to hell with these subtleties. today , uh, two packets of petals were released in the kirovsky district. and the woman exactly, who, well, left wounded, tore off her leg, did it. well, the ukrainian government, why does it threaten whom? what is this about ? it's the same it's done by order zelensky, you understand, two cassettes with petals , one injured woman lives, what is there to discuss? what formalities to hell yes radio yes lc, now they are also under shelling, mainly the northern part of the territory, which was recently liberated by svatova starobelsk from the hospital, kuibyshev akirov district, in the morning it seems to me that i misspoke. yes, i am

now literally on a pack. there, six hammer rockets fly there, yes, that is, they fly to children's institutions in social facilities. where there may be people. where areas may be. this suggests that ukraine is just so afraid to shiver to the teeth, introducing these restrictions in the water of persecution, trying to intimidate, and there, shouting at him, we would now shoot everyone, but a democratic state for participating in the most democratic procedure, promises 15 years. yes, this is a very democratic state, and you know, dmitry's last phrase literally reacts to yours. i believe that the current difficult situation is psychological, it is extremely important for us to be sovereign. the government must be honest with its people, then the people will be absolutely honest with their state, because in this situation the war cannot be otherwise. yes, i absolutely agree with you at the level of development principles. the work that ensures honesty and communication is also specially organized by very strict requirements, of course. today i have everything right

now watch the whiskey programs and see you tomorrow. information services tv channel russia continues its work on the air you watch the news. my name is maria hello man, killed in the izhevsk school. the children of the teacher are guarding the criminals with a t-shirt with a swastika and tagged cartridges, his identity is established donbass votes for russia on the fourth day of the referendum.