tv Morozova RUSSIA1 October 13, 2022 1:00am-2:01am MSK
1:00 am
they will plan, based on this time frame that they actually have, so hopefully you know, there is a separate statement. here in november there, we will capture something there, someone sucks there, someone will attack, someone will win, someone will not do anything, because there are global goals of the task that have not been achieved, and they will gradually move in this direction, and here is not only the factor of ukraine ukraine - this is just one such, you know , a small gear mechanism in all this typewriter, yes, which they launched in relation to the russian federation, among other things, we will see attempts of terrorist acts and attempts to destabilize the situation. inside russia, all this will be throughout this period. it just needs to be rethought and realized that we live in a completely different time with completely different methods of conducting political struggle. completely different methods. it's not about democracy anymore. it 's not about any of this at all. new methods
1:01 am
of political struggle, well, if you like, it's even fighting without rules, because the goals of the tasks that are defined they require tremendous efforts to solve them. and here, no one will neglect anything, all the methods in this situation. well, it is clear that the world is already working without money. the world has changed and will never be the same again. eh, that's right. now, regarding, uh, today, i carefully watched, uh, the russian energy week of the forum, you know, there was a lot of talk about gas, a lot of talk about terrorist attacks, and so on. and one moment caught my eye, because long before all this. we talked about american attempts to capture the european market. that is they the task. they even, well, like, well, they publicly voiced what they did not like. yes, the share of the russian market in the energy market and they are systematic. e, so to speak, e are implementing their certain plans, and here i want to pay attention to what? yes, putin has repeatedly said
1:02 am
that the situation that has developed in the energy market is a mistake of european politicians in relation to the satellite market. yes, it's not not the idea of russia, this is the idea of european critics, who by this mistake led to the fact that gas prices rose. and you know what i was thinking, but i think it's a mistake. and i'm wondering if this is a mistake. or maybe it's not a mistake at all. it's just that europe itself has agents of influence from the united states of america who proposed this idea. what is the purpose of raising prices in europe and making american shale gas profitable, which should enter the european market, you understand? maybe it's not a mistake at all. just i want europeans to pay attention to their politicians, to those people who make such decisions and the consequences of these decisions. perhaps, after all, there are not quite the same people who represent the interests of europe. perhaps, there are actually people who absolutely consciously made decisions with understanding. the consequences for the entire
1:03 am
european union, and we are faced with this today, you understand, because, what are we talking about, and for the americans it was extremely important to raise prices. and they have another option. they have the possibility of politically pushing these decisions. so they raised prices on the energy market for gaz and then they politically created the image of the enemy and the political ones are trying to physically squeeze the russian federation out of the military-political and take them to blow up the russian federation from the energy market. europe is all fine and good. if you understand, after all this, yes, the americans would stabilize the european market and a whole person would act, but this will not happen. no, this will not happen for this, and they prepared. and then we this has already been discussed a thousand times, and then to industrialization. and then take care, and then it's rallies, and then it's military, and then it's destabilization of the entire european continent. as a matter of fact. the americans just
1:04 am
sit and applaud absolutely exactly when in ukraine, by the way, they said, we will live, as in europe, i always thought, well, you are just fantasizing. now i believe. i just didn’t know what had to happen to europe for ukrainians to live the same as in europe. now i understand what should have happened write life understand eugene well, of course it happened, because we often affiliate, as public opinion believes that this option in modern times does not work this word at all. yes , we can appeal to sociological polls, most likely, they agreed with me after a few broadcasts. well, it happens occasionally. well, i won’t lose, as they say, well, in any case, as long as i can say, the next thing you know is that people are accustomed to such a war, in fact, and you are talking about the fact that there was acronyms for eyeliner vladimir's daughter. here is for me. in general, well, i still do surveys, but i have been doing surveys for more than 30 years. i understand how some processes are going on, how elections are taking place in different countries. listen, when the macron was elected, it became clear to me. i don't believe it could be. i don't believe it's not for me. well, there is a world
1:05 am
government, some conspiracies, but total control. uh, let's say electoral behavior. i saw it categorically here in the first elections. that is, i understood the issue of democracy, not that it is good or bad, that is, the process in world controlled. this is the first thing i want to pay attention to the question that they will wake up, they will not wake up, they live in this paradigm. they will live in it with the third argument, which i want to say that you understand people are accustomed to war. they are already living in this war on the sly, little by little they are being squeezed out of peaceful life. the first is the covid topic of restricting the movement of almost one and a half billion people around the world. now this is the subsidence of the population, relatively speaking, the defatting of the population of the middle class, primarily in europe and the next moment is accustoming to war. like, for example, here, i just looked at polish sociology today, but the poles are simply handsome. they made sociologists about the fact that the polish society, in principle, is ready to accept nuclear weapons of fear. no, if before it was mystical, horror yes, remember yes 54%, uh nuclear deal. i just want to pay attention to two numbers, i looked,
1:06 am
so i understood, but they are of high quality and work great. and here's the second point, that 93% of young people are aged 29 and under. well, that is, the reference group of young people. here, well, more than 90% support this idea, if it will be the next moment, that most of the inhabitants of the cities of opponents are only less than a third. you see, here you are, in fact, prepared public opinion further in the virtual world. there is no fear of a nuclear explosion. they are no longer afraid. and this is the dulling of fear, because when you are immersed in a certain information field, you live in this field. and i do not understand, there it seems that if he does not know the consequences of his money about it, the point is that i think that they believe that it will be their nuclear weapon, that is, it begins to seem to them that due to this they are included in the elite club of nuclear powers. they do not understand that it will not be their nuclear weapons, and it is absolutely right not to dispose of them, and i am just saying that we are talking about the deployment of american nuclear weapons. i began to put it mentally and
1:07 am
it was exactly in poland, so that's what i want to pay attention to, asks what will happen. that's how a person thinks in a war, you know, sociology works, it removes behavior. she is sees high. uh, high stress among the population, the absence of a planning horizon for some future, the actually formed image of the enemy, which is not written off to the elites, but russia, appointed by the enemy. that is, this happened a long time ago. it has already gone through the process of institutionalization. it won't turn around anymore. you just understand every social movement. there is inertia. it lasts for several years. so pavlovich told spiridon that there, when she was there for the twenty-fourth year, there was something else. well , maybe he can be. no, it's a year of illusions on the fourteenth of the fifteenth, but because the questions changed in relation to i will also tell you about this, honestly here i had no illusions, the reformatting of ukraine was in full swing. and i, in general, expected that it would be so. and i
1:08 am
didn't really expect it. i thought that we had an alternative, quite high, and that's exactly what i 'm talking about. we all had opportunities. uh, it was there in that peaceful ukraine when most people were in favor of the victory day, uh, even there 15 years ago. uh, say he upa it was in the zone statistical error, but the most important thing is that you said the right thing, and if on the other hand it is on the other hand to look at the problems, they worked with the brains. the reformatting took place on our territory in a loyal population with a population loyal to us and russia, the majority, first of all. and i mean that, in principle, those who worked. no , this is primarily a western structure that works. i wait they are school teachers. because initially the reformatting went back from the time. kuchma through a school teacher, not accidentally a bunch, he says, i say again, i am not a ukrainian nation, a schoolboy formed. i don't want to show up. let's say that my thought is unequivocal i say again, the west i never change it as it is, it is the
1:09 am
moderator of the processor, if there is no desire inside, if there is no inside, there is no environment, if the environment is ready, it accepts it all. you have children. of course, you remember when they are small, yes, that is, they don’t want to, but you still have to politely explain what is good for them, what is bad for them, they grow up. this is when we reason about society. we hmm don't really understand what we're dealing with. in general, we can say very smart, very adult respected people, but when they format it and start formatting it from school and when there is state power that gives textbooks where ideologies are rigidly prescribed and the child is immersed in this cultural, and he is at corded environment, that is, the cultural environment of the violence of the betrayal of nazism, then you can spend any money. from the outside, these codes will be hard to root out if the state takes teachers and for a long time there, schoolchildren and students are brought up in this spirit. but, when
1:10 am
vasily dmitritch spoke like, well, his children are written there in the textbook such that when you come home, even stand, even though it falls here it is very difficult to break it from the outside. uh, you know, i do not agree with you to spend on civil society. i do not agree with you because there is a task that is being solved from the outside if you do not want to work with their brains, but the most important thing is the environment that was here. she was complementary to that there was no counterpagan. no policy action before the whole study. well, where they propagate you ca n't go to school. can't you go to the institute? with what god? why can't we for one simple reason, which since the ninetieth year i worked at donetsk university, led by the hand? kuchma excuse von soros, we do it, if you like. no , there was such a merger that the state and the funsors worked together. the state, if you like, at some time became von soros and became
1:11 am
the state. what the old man soros said that almost everyone who governs ukraine is his listeners. it turns out that they did not succeed in reformatting ukrainian society, because in the last elections even zelensky was 74%, but people voted against these nationalists and everyone else along with poroshenko yes, i think that i think that, firstly he managed to create a colossal generational split. pokalencheski split and this is important, you still understand that well , listen, well, you have a mighty ship going there. well , okay. you will blow. maybe run fans nearby. listen, the girls voted not too voted for russia against poroshenko and the nationalists. everything is very difficult for us nationally , nationalism has become part of the ukrainian ideology , they are brought up correctly in school, you can’t, you won’t go to college if we are absolutely russia in
1:12 am
the textbook, russia has nothing to oppose. listen. let’s say we don’t have an ideology in the country , we don’t have a textbook that we can bring to give to ukrainians, which would be written correctly, we just now rewrote our textbooks normally, what could you oppose. time kuchma, at the time of kuchma, at least we had to put an interest in common life into an authorization interest. in general, i listen. let me finish here. here they are the president of the times right you are all right, each in their own way. i say one reason in a country that was absolutely complementary to russia that this whole thing happened and we had all the arguments to live a simple thing. zhenya, you must understand. listen , i wrote ukraine to russia, why did this happen? why did the word regarding occur? yes it was
1:13 am
it has never been like this. you, who headed the last year, kravchuk hated the soviet government, hated russia, i still have the reason for the ways that can solve the problem. they can't solve problems. from the outside, this is purely just about the inside. this is a purely ukrainian eternal theme. you us. well, how will you make us out of russia so that we are the idea is our erroneous idea about ukraine about the processes that took place in ukraine, i have been talking about this for many years. i've been here for almost ten. we must have some representation. it has to do with our past history. it has to do with our common life. this is due to our close relatives, with whom it was impossible to say a conflict, but it is ukrainian. it didn't bother anyone. listen , a huge number of people were worried about nothing on this sheet, they did nothing, what they did, just hunting and other things, they only pumped russia's money in there. everyone who
1:14 am
will tell you correctly, how to download russia to you correctly ? whom he pumped began by pouring shit on a neighbor who you were told that there are people to work. here a man says, well , they recently changed, they asked, so i asked him, he will say, and others who i don’t know were pumped up to me. ask spent five projects. they were also right, therefore, when everyone is in the fence, everyone is fenced in all his projects and not only him, when they look, you look at the ukrainian opposition for 30 years, all such affectionate calves for russian money, everything and everyone starts by smearing each other with shit , but also a national feature, but there’s nowhere to smear, but no one did everything well, who made a project that worked. well, listen, i promised, unfortunately, unfortunately for
1:15 am
the vast majority of those who, so to speak, fronted the russian idea in ukraine, this was a way to make money. what kind of dialogues these people never had, we didn't have any ideology. yes, and why was there no responsibility for what you did, where the result of the result is never the responsibility of some result, when yeltsin formulated in the morning you think that you can for ukraine, these are those who did something, like luzhkov yes, in sevastopol they were perceived almost as a opposition. and when now eugene makes some claims of what claims? i'm not warning. i already found it here. why even in the past dig it already no country has ever been lost. now you're telling us, so we wo n't go. here you should understand ours, who carried your country well,
1:16 am
you can give all the arguments to me, but for me everything was clear nationally, so that the russian ukrainians. never fought. these are understandable points. ukrainians fought always. nothing, listen. yes, nothing like this happens in different new things against each other. we are now fighting not with the ukrainians. yes? so i sort of see when people say, now we'll go there, we 'll figure something out, in principle, there are ukrainian manners in russia and teach russia come at me, yes, what do you have to do with it? i see this from a wild number of people. everyone came and began to explain to us how we were supposed to. well, show me, well, yes, and we'll say, you talk about one thing directly 100 times, it's hard for yourself in secret. got out wow. we ourselves have chosen with difficulty we still have in the country and dialogues. no, we are now disentangling, then you say, why didn’t you deal with ukraine yes, we didn’t deal with russia all right. we did not
1:17 am
deal with russia. we all stood in line, how to escape to the west as strange. we ran, who will have time to run ahead of yeltsin after him all together. and we could still build competitions among ourselves, who did it, who would enter earlier. they also talked about it there. what did we have to do with ukraine? why did we need a pipe at all? well indulge it was necessary to head and thought thought about something else. oh i just want to say to the soviet union wake up i want to say one simple thing. i'm not teaching anyone. i don't want anyone else, come on, excuse me, start. i’m telling, i’ve closed the whole topic, yes, how many programs you tell us in a row, everything worked wrong with ukraine, a stupid sociologist, stupid speech, it’s not at all the same as saying that you cannot draw conclusions from your own
1:18 am
history. ukraine needs to draw conclusions. what is your conclusion that russia gave you? well done, at least a penny and taught a lesson talking about himself personally. but what sounds like sounds so you invested us a little. you are of little interest to us, so you have lost us. what are you, a girl, on extradition, or what? you look like only one real ukraine, this is donbass, this is ukraine that feels like a part of russia what is the heart of russia, yes, which, in fact, while maintaining including its ukrainianness, but not neglecting it, not spitting on it no. we have ukrainian russia of course there is, look, no. we have nothing real, please, nothing bad not ukrainian, culture not ukrainian. let's go to ukraine tomorrow let's not make it in time again. i wanted two on two e, at the moments it will remain very quickly,
1:19 am
firstly, i would not tie e. uh, this is the information that russia published to the federal security service and the schemes. i wouldn't tie it to the grain deal. for one simple reason. i’m not criticizing, i’m not saying that this is true, but the moment when, supposedly from ukraine, uh, this weapon came in, yes or a boat. in the bulgarian river port, you know that until august and during august, and a lot of ports were working. from the danube they went, really small ports small boats went to uh, bulgaria so this is most likely not a grain deal, but uh better to close. why i just have such doubts, i wouldn’t fasten it, but, but the main thing, today i talked with some, well, with some people in western ukraine, and the reactions about how they feel, this is not a stream, it’s just people
1:20 am
concrete simple. i ask them how, you, how it is now, that's what happened. how are you evaluate? i was very strong. i'm not that surprised. i was amazed because the answer was amazing. here's what the answer was. i was told on the ukrainian sea. well, i have already lived twice with uh, russia thinks that the third time we live it comes to him quickly. i am translating into russian, what is there to translate? it's all clear that when in the thirty- ninth year, uh, i generally understand the language well, the soviet union, uh, took part of western ukraine for myself. it was the first russian, the second russian - it was in the forty-fourth year, when part residents of western ukraine resisted the so-called bandera. yes, as they say, although there were a lot of them and they were crushed, so they were bad russians. and now what kind of people who live in western ukraine say. they say that when we discussed, i say, why does he say that? well, look, the lviv region was bombed. here, there is no
1:21 am
electricity in lviv, but people are not chapalas. see what happens, what, uh, even what the security courts of ukraine that it is impossible to photograph there is no public information, but people communicate with each other, and they say, this, of course, is bad, of course, russia-aggression, of course, war is bad. but in this situation, here are the data of the bombing for 2 days, which were, well, massive shelling, they did not catch people, there are no people who and the people who live there. they say that well, we remember, but we were under russia, we lived in the thirty-ninth year in the forty-fourth year, maybe happy, the second, and i monitor the situation as how many people coming to western ukraine how many people are coming from europe to ukraine and how many are leaving yesterday? well, from the ninth and on the night of may 9-10, there was the first fact when you
1:22 am
traveled to ukraine from western countries more than you left ukraine. that is, before the currents, went in favor of ukraine, but yesterday it stopped. start the curve to rise up. let's see how it will be tomorrow, but people who even say today that the blows continued or not, but today it continues mainly, and vinnitsa but if we take western ukraine yes, arrivals, of course, yes hi. there are still them. well, why am i here for another second nuance, because this is not sociology, of course. it's just about life, what they say, we should be angry, we won't go anywhere, that is, they won't run anywhere, you know, but these two moments, well, russians are russians. well, of course, maybe some of them think that the poles are so poles, if the poles come, yes. that is, there is no wedding in malinovka again. this is from one side of the malinovka spa estate, but i didn’t hear anything like that, at first there was a conflict. i have not heard that if the handles will come. well, what lived forerunner now the third we will already be these vladimirovich war. i want to
1:23 am
support evgeny kopachkov. he said a phrase in the process of a dispute, he said a phrase that he said is correct, i don’t want ukraine to fight with russia i just want to clarify the nuance, it’s not just ukraine that is fighting russia, how many military operations are russians fighting against russians to catch ukrainians ukrainians on the line there is resistance from different chechens. against chechens, georgians against georgians in this in this massacre in this mess, so and uh, there are such. here is erdogan, because they talked about bardogan. here, astana yes, tomorrow, maybe a meeting. well, it’s impossible, but putin’s meeting with erdogan and erdogan is announced. he announced the plan is not a plan. yes, if they noticed that yuri ushakov was the first assistant, right? the president of russia he said that he somehow said something like that, that he says, listen, here zelensky zelensky says when he forbade himself to talk to us. i want to remind you, in principle, that never say never is how he answered a journalist's question. and
1:24 am
then later he said that we are all in anticipation that erdogan might announce his plan to putin tomorrow , his peace plan or a plan for peace resolutions in ukraine. so maybe yes, but before that, lavrov, on the other hand, was intonation. well , i know it's movement. and we expect him to voice it, that is, we from erdogan we expect it to sound, all the same, the negotiations will pour out. you are already going on today about what will happen next, well, all sorts of ukrainian clowns are shouting to russia all the time asking for negotiations. yes, this is a manifestation of our weaknesses. yes, he said that word. well, it's a quote. yes , we just think differently, and therefore a very big problem. it consists in the fact that we perfectly understand how the head of ukrainian political research works. what is their
1:25 am
ideology? we don't have any. people about who is, who is who? what controls, who actually controls, what britain actually decides and what america decides where you can see it, that is, we understand all this. that's the whole hematosis. here on the fingers, but on the other side they do not understand anything they don’t understand anything about putin, they don’t understand anything about how decisions are made here. the main thing is how surovikin works, how he thinks. i don’t understand at all, that’s why they can’t predict nasheeds, that’s why all the intelligence agencies that allegedly stick out couldn’t predict two massive ones on monday and tuesday. surprisingly none of the institutions are even british. although it seems to them that they understand everything, so i say it again. putin's speech in the st. george hall shows that whatever brownian the movement of entrepreneurs, there are all kinds of people with
1:26 am
different interests. here, so that they do not twitch. putin so harshly formulated that there is no turning back. kherson zaporizhia lpr dpr is already russia, that's all. this is already a change in our constitution, that's all, but for the time being it will be against, but we don't care. well, he said, i’m not ready to talk that the soviet union didn’t give a damn about russia at all, and russia doesn’t give a damn about biden, the president of the russian federation doesn’t report to the macron, unlike the president of ukraine, he doesn’t report to biden, not before a macron, not before schultz, the president of the russian federation is responsible to the people of russia and to the great history of the russian federation and to god, and this is what you need to understand, see you tomorrow.
1:27 am
1:28 am
1:29 am
1:30 am
yesterday he called, my former student shishkov he is now a pathologist in the city, they brought him a body for an autopsy, who died from cardiology. and what are some problems with establishing the cause of death? no, there, everything, of course, acute internal bleeding as a result of the disappearance of a duodenal ulcer. she was operated on. yes, but they could not save, she died right on the operating table. so what's the problem? yes, in that examination of the force shishkov discovered fresh hematomas. and then he alerted me and called me, and i reminded her that she was obliged to report this to the authorities. well, that's the whole story who? it is correct to say maiorov. but
1:31 am
1:32 am
1:33 am
1:34 am
yes, of course, i remember, they called me to this patient, how high she was. yes, high, she pressed against the pain and the touring area on the left during palpation. i found that the abdominal muscles. strongly tense. understood that it was internal bleeding breathing. well, a typical picture, i immediately sent her to the operating room, there was nothing more i could do with the limbs. she underwent heparin therapy as
1:35 am
a result of treatment. there was a positive trend in any pain in the abdomen. she didn't complain about any entries. i did not see. by the way, her story is still on duty, the nurse on duty. you can check? do not remember that day to that sisters you live. well, yes, it seems, maryina masha, and she is still on duty there, by the way, and you also don’t know, by chance, where the traces of beatings came from on gusakov’s body. i have no idea any marks on her body. i didn’t see it. thank you very much. goodbye doctor.
1:36 am
1:39 am
the guy every day came a delicacy, all sorts he brought one thing and then the other walked with her. well, in general, cared. i am in his mind. at first i thought that he was drunk, but he did not smell of alcohol, rather a drug addict. maria petrovna you don't happen to have a phone on this one. mikhail said to call, if something, here's mikhail salazarov gusakova's address to write to you. no, there is history. thank you very much, the doctor is always like that. as far as i have known him.
1:40 am
1:41 am
1:42 am
1:44 am
roads, especially if it is a path of great and important goals for the viewers to follow their path tomorrow at 16:30 on the russian cinema channel on weekends. she goes through all the circles, well, then the beloved returns. she forgives him to beautiful fairy tales, she always preferred psychological drama. she should not forgive him the eclipse on saturday and sunday at 12:55 on the channel russia
1:45 am
1:46 am
1:47 am
1:48 am
i'm telling you, well, where is the district police officer? yes, i already heard that on the way. hello philip. hello, can you imagine getting lost in the hospital, being taken. and what kind of character is this? a by-product, you need to check everything, perhaps the overdose was not accidental. well, i would paint.
1:49 am
1:50 am
was her assistant, and you liked it. well, of course . if, of course, you understand what i mean to work with her. this is an invaluable experience. and i'm tired of being the accuser. she decided to try herself on the other side as a defense. no, i didn't guess. she generally spoke little about health, well, with such a nervous job. let's talk about gusakov's son, the last thing i heard is that he ended up in the hospital with an overdose. terrible child terrible son worthless man
1:51 am
persuaded him to go to a good rehab center back. but what didn't help, well, he returned two months ago. it seems that he did not use lived in his communal apartment. he called, called, the keys were not taken away after he started stealing money and stole two bronze prices. i bought him a room and mastered the knowledge that on the eve of his death, his son was highly beaten. came up to this. well she didn't tell me anything if i knew you
1:52 am
by chance they did not know what gusakov could have kept in his home safe. i've never been interested in this, but maybe the money documents, wait, and he also robbed her. scum you're not up to date high left a will. how much do i know? no , she was going to, if it was, i would know. and now this ferret inherits everything.
1:53 am
it is necessary to interview the doctor more directly at the department that processed the admission to the high hospital. tomorrow i will do at the same time find out about the state of her son. and he, by the way, is not high on the first anything. oops mikhail consider everything a labor feat for today, completely come on.
1:54 am
1:55 am
, and rhinoplasty. well, this is, of course, from my own experience, wait. tell me, how do you know all this? just interested. well, i can be a plastic surgeon, i'll go to study. interesting, but i'm wondering why you are looking at night busy? so i was just a free part of me, then i decided that and although wait, it seems i know that you know, right? oh ksenia stupidity. just don't talk. and i won't let you out of anything. you and him, by the way, are a very good couple. have you already been invited on a date? yes, and when in 2 days just no date, everything is clear, so in two days i will make you out of you, unless of course, you have enough patience. and we'll start with this
1:56 am
1:57 am
age. i made a note in the column and ulcer under the question. why is it a standard practice that such a record is made in question so that the attending physician checks everything, and until then he prescribed treatment as if she had an ulcer to avoid, so to speak. from internal hemorrhage as a result of the disappearance of a duodenal ulcer of this it can't be, i remember exactly what it is, though. intensive care . thank you. i'll be right over. nothing to
1:58 am
look at me like that. i won't talk to you. do you want to talk? let's say that stanislav sergeevich is used to a personal lawyer, right? but your mother is not alive, mother, do not touch. yes, of course, only you can touch it. i just wanted to talk about it with you. i feel bad. here and now, let 's continue your treatment and our conversation in the prison hospital. reasons i have you beat your mother in front of witnesses. i did not beat anyone witness. she beat my mother herself. said
1:59 am
he'd call security and said i attacked her with a knife. won. what story did you come up with? not bad what happened next i noted with friends the improvement in my mother's well-being. when did the hospital call? heavy drugs i don't know, but it's not forbidden to use here. just like isaev hide. indeed,
2:00 am
10 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Russia-1 TV Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on