and at the same time, artificial intelligence does not replace the radiologist, but acts only as his assistant and an additional digital tool. the study comes from the device to the doctor’s workstation to the radiologist, already analyzed by the artificial intelligence service, having performed all his routine measurements for him, the result of today is seven more than seven million analyzed studies using the artificial intelligence service. this is about 40%. panorama museum battle of borodino celebrates its the sixtieth anniversary is dedicated to this anniversary, a special educational program scheduled for next sunday , visitors are waiting for lectures, excursions, unique exhibits and historical documents. this is a rare opportunity to get under the observation deck and see outstretched arms in the distance. one of the largest paintings in the world. panorama museum, the largest center for the study of the era of the war of 1812. its funds contain almost 45,000 items. all

news is always available on the media platform, we look in the application or on the site we look.ru for now, while denis panchikov was with you, see you. good afternoon. this is a program who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio of dmitry kulikov these days, the capital of kazakhstan, astana, is the capital of the summits. yesterday there was a meeting on interaction and a world of trust in asia today a meeting of the council of cis heads of state and a summit of the heads of central asian countries, which is called russia central asia, the outlines of the new

world order are emerging more and more clearly in the economy, too, turkey and russia are being created in the local gas. hub erdogan. decided to get to work immediately said there was nothing to look forward to. saudi arabia russia will jointly build petrochemical plants. a project for the construction of the first nuclear power plant in saudi arabia is being launched on the territory of both countries. rosatom intends to participate in the competition. the publication of the politician at the same time declares that the union lists are not able to cover all the expenses of member countries for assistance to ukraine, and in britain, the list of stras is already ready to abandon of their economic reforms, which instilled a catastrophe and dismiss the minister of finance, who allegedly slipped this plan to her on a grandiose scandals lon. mark musk turned to the pentagon for

financing the starlink internet network provided to ukraine for his own money. he doesn’t intend to do this anymore, so he tweeted , he didn’t ask me to fuck off. here he dropped it. this is free quotation. in general, the scandal is grandiose and i think this will not be the case. tucker carlson's most popular, us tv presenter has articulated attitudes towards conservative americans to constant whining. and begging zelensky look. yes some impudent t-shirt foreigner is demanding money from us to cover his critical economic needs. we also have our friends. who the hell are you troll get out since

when did this guy have a right to people like tasked again remind us to get congress out of hypnosis we don't owe this guy a dime a dime. good luck buddy. that 's all for now. our economy is deteriorating, and the borders have disappeared, he lectures us and rolls out a list of gifts. well i want it i want it, i want a bike. yes hurry up, seriously. go buddy. well, mr. zelensky waited for such wordings, who said that he was not getting enough supplies, he was poorly supported, poorly fed. in general, in my opinion, they did not promise to feed. yes, maxim is the cost of what zelensky himself proudly called arrogant diplomacy, with many it works, because when such pressure comes from ukraine, some give in and retreat. well, yes, yes,

yes translate an example before the arrogance of the bullshit of this outgoing proverb german politicians. well, actually capitulated. but here the americans are not used to such that someone is a junior partner. but in general. as if subordinates demand something from them. well, you can ask politely. and they are not used to waiting for a reaction to demand this. well, that's how i think, uh, expressed my attitude, it reflects the position of part of the republican party, not the majority. still, in general, let's not deceive ourselves with them in ukrainian, unfortunately for us, but a two-sided concert, but nonetheless. so far it's not there. we'll see, let's see, i think not so fast he will think that the fast maxim trend is what lubrication is , of course, but i understand, yes, we have a daily program, we cannot quote. uh,

dmitry will show you verbatim. you quoted him as delicately as possible. but when they send you a foul language, let's just say, yes, here max went with a mask. well, he did not write like that, i follow your recommendations. ha, here it is, brazen diplomacy. well sorry guys, that is, in general, actually at some point. this e question will arise, e edge before western politicians and even now, when i talk to western political analysts there, but it is clear that now they are all emotional. here comes the fight. they are waiting there. eh, how will this acute phase of sorting out relations at the front, which we will have with ukraine, i think, end in october and november, but after that they say, well, of course, we are basically all for the defeat of russia, but questions begin to arise. but, if we assume, indeed, russia is

defeated, ukraine will not become the main threat in this new world? here is such an insolent, emboldened and militarily strengthened ukraine at the expense of us , how is it further with it, what to do? well, she decides with hungary to find out from ours they have a lot of grievances quen-, e, accumulated clients. here is the last yes , plant and some other insults, that is. ukraine can become ungovernable, and this is what the west is starting to think about now, and the last thing i will say is that you also need to pay attention. i haven't seen the translation yet. i think it will appear, or it would be good foreign press in the french newspaper figovo published a report. eh, a correspondent journalist who came to izum and made a report about the filtration camps that are set up there for those who, as they say, collaborated. e, was a

collaborator collaborated with the occupation authorities. listen, but even the french. in general, sympathizing with ukrainians in general. they say, well, these people had no choice. they survived the postman, but he just continued to work as an elementary school teacher, and yet they are sent there and even the ukrainian officers themselves, who are involved in these interrogations, they say we did not think that there would be so many collaborators of 10%, 10% of the fall. to have all 30%, that is, questions begin to arise. so where does this lead to the future? we'll see? i would just correct your assessment a little, it's not about victory, it's about victory. they have no illusions. they are, in principle, thinking about what will happen on the territory where there are 800,000 or 900,000 people with weapons, and the armed ones are taken out into the field. here and which exist only on the money that they pay them. that in itself is a big problem. and this problem in any case, will the

upcoming so to speak, well, in the run of october november, how did you say or there december? will you have time to sort things out for ukraine then, or will it not happen? not much success, but you have a problem with these nine hundred thousand people, with weapons or eight hundred or with places, no one knows for sure in the most such estimates. that a million with weapons wanders around ukraine , not only among the troops, but on the whole, wanders around ukraine has about a million people with weapons. that's what you want, then you do. this is me, a tweet by elon musk. yes, uh, well, i won't translate swear words from english there. yes, i will not translate from english the curses that melnik sent the mask, and musk calmly trolled very elegantly and said, well, we just follow your recommendations. in what it should, but here, if it should, excuse sociology to say that this

starling here is very important for the asu, because they carry out. well, all operational planning, target designation command, the american is going through through not these wild stalinkas. and firstly, with the networks themselves. and that's how the problem started. and ukraine itself reported this, they say something does not work. well, let's not, we don't know why it doesn't work, but a hundred. worse, but on the other hand, musk said well, now i have to pay 100 million dollars by the end of this year and next year it will be about 400. no, i won’t, they told me to leave. i went to the pentagon, let them finance. this is an interesting turn of events. well, the brain without a crochet. i think he is also in this, no matter how he miscalculated the question not in this. it seems to me that this is a lubricant situation - this is a very good example for all businessmen who want to deal with ukraine and expect some kind of reciprocity. yes, that is, you helped and you were told

a kind word. listen, they didn’t say a good word to the pope, he was a poor fellow, and only managed to speak out about daria duhina. yes, to express condolences, he was kicked all over ukraine. like a garbage can, the same thing happened from islam, i think that, of course, for ukraine , starling is, uh, extremely necessary, as it were element, yes for especially for the military. because the connection, as you said, fails, he takes it even where the connection does not work. and if he stops, in fact, providing such a service, they will have very, very, uh, serious problems with zelensky's arrogance of cynicism , you know, huh? it seems to me that he does everything very consistently and correctly. i’ll explain to you, what’s the trick here, uh, that he constantly here regularly tries to somehow shift the responsibility to western leaders and politicians, but it seems to me that this can be seen by the unarmed eye. each time, he says that we do not have

enough weapons. we need such a weapon, they don’t give us, and so on and so forth, this is an attempt in case of defeat. yes, shift the responsibility to the west. that's the same thing i see here, when he attacks, yes, european politicians. so impudently behaves with the americans, he himself signs a ban on negotiations. we think this is funny. but it seems to me that there is some kind of logic in this, and zelensky's logic lies. he is everything for the ukrainian domestic consumption. yes, for the ukrainian politician he is trying to demonstrate his consistency, his determination, his focus on victory, and so on. well, the west didn’t bring weapons to the negotiating table here, forcing them to sit down and so on and so forth. that is, this is zelensky’s attempt to relieve himself of responsibility for everything that will be, it will be anyway sooner or later, that is, it’s not ukraine, it’s not such an influential state for us that can influence the course of negotiations, let’s say between the states, let’s say, and uh, russia well zelensky

can, as much as you like, say nothing about ukraine without ukraine but in fact. i think that the issue of ukraine will be resolved without ukraine argul. zelensky will be allotted in this, exclusively technical, and there will not be any at all for this technique, or maybe not at all, i am betting on the second question. i have already said that the possibility of peace will actually arise the moment zelensky disappears one way or another. after the video , it will disappear, after that it has arisen, because now it is designed in such a way as the main barrier. he was also awarded the powers of pseudo. in the west they say, well, as zelensky says, so be it. and at the same time green. well, they say on the sidelines. you look, you hold. if god forbid, and then you need us to go there, don't let the question go. and zelensky plays this wonderful theater. i still continue to insist that the level of influence on zelensky himself from britain is much

stronger even than from the united states. you see, the paradox lies in the fact that there is a president endowed with broad powers, well, no a trait that does not understand politics or his politics, but he has enough, whose powers are controlled by the british, yes, but there is also a part of the political and military elite inside ukraine that works directly with the americans. yes, and here are these two forces. in general, they actually manage. all that what is happening in ukraine, well, depends very much on the states. no , i'm not saying that he does not depend on the states, but in the operational plan, zelensky is managed by the british. i'm sure of it. i'm sure, i’m sure, and thank god i’m not sure, i don’t know, i don’t have data, let’s say, but i just want to say, let’s say you’re right, it doesn’t matter, because there is no separate degree of coordination, so to speak, mission, aim for a long time. um, well, for decades, it has been in fact, in many ways

, a division of the american intelligence services. they have the right to be independent. of course there is. i do not argue with this, but look at johnson, again, how america plays. well, as it were, a series or a whole row of dummy figures. there is clearly dummy figure avatar literally, this is zelensky well, how to play there is another figure john and at the moment when there was a crisis situation for america in istanbul, if an agreement had been signed , then america would not have kept the situation and ukraine would have been kept jumping out on on a white horse , johnson seems to be, as if on his own. he goes straight to ukraine and stops, and the americans, again, wonderful for them. see their main element of the strategy is to keep the handles free handles somewhere. here they are, here's what's going on there, k has nothing to do with us, has nothing to do with us , and therefore all statements that we will

not go there with troops america will not fight for ukraine they are in this principled position , because the americans know the strategy of their winnings is that until the last ukrainians to the last pole to the last european will go to war. america will sit across the ocean and watch it. there is no difference in fools between zholz and zelensky, they will do all this, but there will be managers fools like johnson, well, who should portray the geopolitical power of britain on their own. this is how i see this picture, by the way, confirmation of this stoltenberg, listen to me questions about two different things. the first fight against the alliance, in this case, we will use the fifth article. well, when it comes to ukraine, nato is not

a party to the conflict, we support ukraine in its defense. ukraine is a close partner. we have been supporting ukraine for many years, the allies of the alliance have changed, dressed ukrainian troops with the fourteenth year and of course after the february rejection of the allies of the associations and of course, and for a month a week we continue to supply more modern weapons systems. cruelty of the russian troops that's it, article fifth article separately. so even if there is something with the poles with everyone else, then this will be done at the risk of the poles in any nato, no america will sign this for me. by the way, where is the sleepover with several million that he sawed off from zelensky, which is an agreement

prepared. this is what stoltenberg said, if ukraine loses, nato loses. yes, this is what it says about the need to be a direct participant in this conflict, but this contradicts one another. here is his statement and the second statement. well, nothing in your mind and you in their mind does not contradict anything. so you see, when we chant. here we are talking, and before our eyes, russian minds are clichés, we divide, we rule, we fight with the wrong hands. they've been doing it for centuries, for centuries, so they don't have any contradiction. the main thing is to find a useful idiot, and those who want to sign up go. useful to friendly tribes , we discussed this in march. here, well, ukraine signed up for friendly tribes. her duty is to fight. for this they give her whiskey, gunpowder and a blanket. here. well, everything, everyone is happy, nothing has changed in 300 years. yes, he loves you. yes, in my youth. well, if there were students,

yes, if you did something when var of gourmets, fought, something was said wrong there or or it will be expressed incorrectly. they tell me that you are not russian? do not you understand? here. uh, although ukrainians don't matter there. and so i think, this mask is not russian, not ours. well, listen, they sent him. that's what a russian person would do, if melnik would find this for him at least. and what did musk do, a pure american, he said, yes, guys, i'm taking it. i'm leaving, well, along with either the system or the money, and best of all, the system has money. all listen. well, i mean, that's what they say. ukraine, you have no idea how many couch experts today, let's say ukrainians began to defend melnikov, they say, well done. he's done well, and this one, bastard max what did he call you, what did he tell you this i'm what dmitry are you about the state of this public consciousness of society, the importance of public consciousness is very important. it is turned this, but explicit is

scary to me. well, god bless him, something else can be fixed there, as for zelensky’s personality, shevchenko and i gave a study, yes, a group of companies was given a rating by a sociological company, uh, money for research. this is the russian war. uh, they're attacking. rockets fall every day. but the administration is the office of the president, he found the money and says, let the people speak, who is the most popular person among ukrainians. now they have spoken and brought zelensky. he says, like this i'm second best. and who is shevchenko? well, i thought that andriy shevchenko yes, he was told this colloquial organ. well, okay. all i need for a study in ukraine is that today's study has shown that the most popular person in ukraine is shevchenko, and in second place is the current current president vladimir zelinskiy well, there are already going on, you know what i'm talking about, i'm talking about the fact that the past 10 days ago was an israeli newspaper.

she said he's the most popular jew in the world, fucking the most influential now. now they said that he is the most popular politician or person in ukraine , and he reads and enjoys this, you understand, this is in his mind. look, he's a man, and young, maybe he's doing well. he has a wife and children, but he is the current president of the state by a citizen, which i see, it's monstrous. it's monstrous when the level of nazism is the level of narcissism itself. i don't know how to characterize it already crosses all sorts of lines. well, here's the war. there is a bombing going on, a rocket is flying. and you give yourself a rating, you understand? you would say it shut up, quickly. what the fuck rating we have, we'll win the war, then we'll be gone, interview after interview vidosiki after vidosiki. and here you understand your friend. they they all putty work. this is where i am sitting in the bunker, i gathered here six people

of advisers and among them i conducted a survey and appointed yourself second. well, before the first, of course, well, before shevchenko you won't drink, what am i leading to and why am i so emotional? i don’t understand, uh, they talked about when zelensky broke down johnson and broke him, he broke the storms, there is no jasala, and the disease, by the way, scratches further, whom it can break. wait wait, i'm what, well, it's clear that he 's broken. it is clear that he needs to be treated. well , he needs to rest. i don’t know how to act in films, but there is no substitute, you see, ukraine is on fire. this replacement and all these leaders that you say, well, as zelensky says. well, well, well, how it will be, but ukraine must decide for itself, but ukraine must decide what victory is for him, how he will continue to do it and by what means we will ensure this. well, this is cynicism of the highest brand, when the americans tell us to decide

for yourself what victory is for you and how can we decide for ourselves. well, listen, and you, unfortunately, you are right that not only in london there is also duda, there are also the baltic states that come and also, we won’t climb in now, poke poke. i don’t know where already, so that he has such a warm bath, but he is one thing, but i have a question, because when you say french to max, they gave him a question, what will happen if russia wins, loses, but what will happen if ukraine lose here was a publication, here it was really. well, what will happen if ukraine loses? yes, nothing will happen, what does it mean that nothing will happen, the world will sigh, ukraine well, it will not happen, and everything will be blissful trend, another, for now, we give you objectively. well, for now, yes, then let's look at the war, everything is unpredictable, until they think that ukraine can lose. well, let's be objective. i'm talking to you. yes, thanks for

talking. i am very happy. here vasily did not become easier. the truth of this you have er, this question. well, in ukraine there is no place to ask here, maxim is correct to say. eh, here's what i know from there. uh, everyone in this information flask, led by zelensky, is convinced that ukraine wins by asking any logical questions. like this? at in principle, perhaps yes, the head of the date is also saying that ukraine is winning on the battlefield, wait. yes, and saying everyone says everything is great. everything, everything, wonderful. only the head of nato said to uh, we won't fit in at all. no way ukrainians ukrainians came out like that in dozens. here, stop it. well, stop it vasya. here you are . what time is it in general? well, here, uh, proclaimed slogans, you wanted it. ukraine wanted it. she wanted to go all for hire for

zelensky coffee cakes and lace panties. that's all has consequences. you wanted america to send you to fight in russia, you have been trying to get this since the nineties and do not wring your hands. yes, they are not all. but those who wanted for one subjugated and established their dominion over those who did not want this to happen. well, let 's mention one more thing, here's the barrel, which, by the way, to which they sent it, again from america, the signal is very interesting, these are his arguments that if it means tactical nuclear weapons, they will destroy all our armed forces, it's curious that from the american edition of the journalist who refers to m-m. well, a source on a european source on subordinate cheerleaders and says

barrel has greatly exceeded his authority, they write and measure, he does not command anything. he does not have these funds and what he said is nonsense. and this was published by an american publication about nuclear weapons and everything. well, that's all, alexander grigoryevich lukashenko gave comments to the american publication. let's see. who is in what state is president putin very important for countries of the west you know him perhaps, best of all, do you think it is likely that he uses nuclear weapons. most importantly , do not drive your interlocutor and even your opponent into a corner, so you do n’t, uh, cross those lines, as the russians say, red lines. you can't cross them. as for nuclear weapons, but any weapon is created for something, if it is a weapon, it is clear that it is created for use. russia has made

its position clear. god forbid there will be an attack on the territory of the russian federation in in this case, russia can, if necessary , use all types of weapons. as for the subtext of your question, the russian leadership has never set a goal, including president putin. uh, there is no such need to use nuclear weapons in ukraine, and a few days ago, when russia, uh, would have launched precision-guided strikes on ukraine in response to the crimean bridge. you noticed that this is a force and a very decent one. but that's not all russia has. this one, i know for sure, the most modern types of weapons, and there is no need for nuclear weapon. russia will cope without nuclear weapons. and you know the main initiator who is betting on the use of nuclear weapons. no one knows who,

so that this is a historical question for you. he will tell you more. it is provoking you, the united states of america, to make some gestures in terms of nuclear weapons, do not fall for this trick. you are a large technological country, the united states of america does not need to dance to the tune of crazed politicians. there are nuclear weapons. let it be in warehouses, where it is, because what if the nuclear weapons move. uh, let's say to poland. chain reaction. on the other hand , retaliatory steps will follow, so you don't have to go for it. we need to calm down and sit down at the negotiating table. well, everything is intelligible to the american viewer alexander igorievich. and here he is absolutely right, because in poland, to the right, to the right, first of all, because here is a company, but

in terms of promotion? yes, that tomorrow russia will launch a nuclear strike, it is in many ways. it is also supported by the poles, and indeed . here is a statement by polyakov well, they are too in the style, probably, of ambassador melnik, they began to work that if melnik demands everything, ukraine demands everything, and poland, as the main friend and patron of ukraine, for some reason does not demand, yes, then, and poland decided to demand nuclear weapons from america. this caused a completely fair, very clear, very rare response from the republic of belarus here, president lukashenko is absolutely right, but if you say polyakov and they, too, are now brewing a huge controversy that it seems that they can be thrown at almost 2 billion euros, because a poland is one of the leaders in well, you don’t count the states there, but one of the leaders in the supply of weapons to ukraine for huge sums, but the poles thought and were sure that brussels would pay for everything , they wrote that there was no money and the company oleg

so they also the germans paid a billion-trillion in compensation. well well, for now it was a joke. now. if someone does not understand, i do not argue. they are waiting. but even if you get a trillion, but another 2 billion. well, in general , it won’t hurt either, as it were, well, for starters, no. you understand from this laughter. now you will continue jelly from this batch. here, well, maxim's joke but it contains a share of a joke, you understand how interesting, it plays the saxon mind, yes, because we have discussed many times, that all this is aimed at the disintegration of the continents. yes, here, as it were, the most important thing, and look at ukraine - this is avatar, first of all, against russia, he is doing, and more - this is an avatar - first of all against germany, now germany is being weakened economically, and then poland will have to finish it off with a trillion. that's good, we're aiming for half a trillion trillion, we'll go down to 500 billion. well, in principle, germany should be poles, it is very difficult to bargain from experience, there will be a

trillion so more than a trillion. i rounded will be one and a half, okay. there will be one and a half, and now one and a half it will also be what will have to, so to speak, from poland to finish off germany. well, they won’t immediately pay for 30 years . if i exaggerate, then slightly, because this scheme is two two horses yes, one is ukrainian the other is polish one from the main blow to russia the other with the main blow to germany and while the germans are working, they didn’t understand anything. well, yes, and now, just now, poland and germany have already been pushed head-on, since the eu has decided that they will nevertheless carry out their training mission, and teach ukrainian warriors, there, uh, the latest combat achievement and created two parallel headquarters one in poland, the other in germany, and naturally a squabble between these two headquarters will begin, pulling

powers, and for some reason it seems to me that the polish headquarters will prevail. literally, the british do not just want the collapse of the european union, not in order for sovereign independent states to appear there. then they want to rebuild this european union, well, for themselves, well, for themselves, the british have a certain goal in this, well, not a fact, you know, they have such a desire, maybe then it's obvious. yes, but for this it is necessary for britain itself, of course, to survive. well, i think that after all the americans are such nonsense, will not allow unacceptable britain can want a lot of things, but already died died so died. here it is sits there on the island and does what you have been assigned? and they are very smart. well, remarque in germany's relations i would not think so much that the poles are not fighting in the fields now one place in germany germany will agree with this, wash and everything will end historically anyway. let's remember that everyone, but an attempt, you know, alexander has

already washed, the torn streams have already washed. they crossed out germany , this is a terrorist attack directly against germany, and germany did not even open its mouth to say that it was done against them , and they were lowered, humiliated and deprived prospects, of course, the united states of america will continue the game that they started, they will continue the bloody performance in which, uh, mr. zelensky plays one of the main roles. this will all continue, but it’s not a fact that germany will ever agree with this, but what will agree, and who asks her will you understand, you argue theoretically, but there is a big geopolitical game . it’s impossible to say here, i miss this move , all then. we're kicking you out. i would not began to write off to germany from everyone, but from all the lists, she wrote off herself, maybe she writes off herself, but in germany there is someone from the

central asian republics, so uh, here is some kind of separate format in principle. it won't hurt, uh, he's in demand. and finally, we are repeating our work on a bilateral basis with our allied partners. but, when we gather here in such a format as today 5, + and hmm, there is another country on the participant, russia, then, as it were, we are no longer looking at the refraction of bilateral contacts. and that's what i'm talking about today said, but we will try to look for such projects and such areas of cooperation that are of interest to the regions as a whole. you know a little. eh, everything. this is also, like, e, everything seems to be the same, but, uh, a look from a different angle, which may be interesting for everyone at once, this next, for example, and something else, for example, uh, there

are colleagues from turkmenistan, here a colleague from turkmenistan spoke about that for the countries of central asia e. for those who do not have access to the oceans. it is very important to cooperate with russia in this format in multilateral central asian in order to all together look for such opportunities, channels. and we hmm are developing a number of projects related to uh that are interesting to us with other partners as well. it is extremely important to bring all this together in an interesting and timely manner. interfax agency good evening it 's no secret that some states in the post-soviet space are wary of the events in ukraine . you met with your colleagues informally during the cis summit. what is your conclusion to against the backdrop of ongoing hostilities, in ukraine hmm, unity in the cis has somehow

strengthened, remained at the same level, or some negative trends are observed. no, as you can see, all this goes through all these formats, they work. this means that they are in demand and our allies, our partners, want to work in such formats. nothing in this sense does not change, but naturally, eh everyone. uh, here we are paying attention to some of the events related to relations between azerbaijan and the army to what is happening between, uh, tajikistan and kyrgyzstan we all know this very well, of course partners. eh, i am interested in and worried about the future development of relations in the russian-ukrainian direction. but this is the subject of discussion. this is true, really nothing of the sort, yes, there is nothing unexpected, and i tell our partners about this in detail, informing them about our point of view. this does not in any way affect the character, quality, or depth

of russia's relations with these countries. please, please. good afternoon tass agency julia you yesterday we held a meeting with the leaders of kyrgyzstan and tajikistan. tell me how it went, and what you managed to achieve as a result. thank you was constructive. naturally, when an attitude is found in a sufficiently hot phase, it is not easy to find some common ground, but nonetheless. uh, it seems to me that we managed to do this , in any case, agree that all measures will be taken to prevent the resumption of hostilities. action. first, second, which is very important, uh, the parties need to take steps to return the refugees to and the third is also essential important elements. essential elements. it lies in the fact that we do not pretend to any intermediary role. although frankly speaking, we were asked about this , we must agree that both one and the other

parties will hand over to us the relevant documents and their vision of solving this problem. and we, e, will not only try to evaluate these proposals on our part, but also use hmm to find a solution , e, and the documents at our disposal that could form the basis of possible agreements with that, i mean, uh, in moscow, uh, sometimes there is even more reliable information about the borders between the union republics than in the union republics themselves. we will raise these documents , we will look at these cards together with our colleagues, then we will look for a solution. so in general this meeting was very useful. give it please. good evening , pavel zarubin, tv channel russia, i have a question that he doesn’t seem to be thinking about very many now in russia, in my opinion, the role of germany in the ukrainian conflict has not been discussed, if konsermerkel took, well, such a rather

reserved position, then scholz, as they say, went down in all serious and with some amazing ease in germany suddenly forgot everything that russia had done to unite the german people with ease, as it seems, turned over very difficult pages reconciliation of two peoples. and now we see the unimaginable just early things. how german guns are again killing russian people. you are an expert on germany, how can you explain everything that is happening and how it will affect the future on in our russian german relations, the choice of those people who, uh, legitimately came to power in a particular country. in this case in germany, uh, they have to decide for themselves what is more important to them. the opinion of some kind of allied obligations, as they see it, uh, or uh, ensuring the interests of their own people of their national interests, judging by what you

said, e is at the head of the chapters in this case, apparently, some kind of allied that obligation. uh, in this case the federal republics within the north atlantic alliance is this correct or not? i believe this is a mistake. uh, this mistake is paying the price. uh, the business economy citizens of the federal republic because it has negative economic consequences for minds in general and for the federal republic in particular, but with its interests, apparently little. who is considered otherwise would not undermine the northern stream one and the northern stream-2. although they did not work, but it was like, well. well, there was such an element of reliability that, in extreme cases, they could turn it on, but now there is no such possibility, although there is one kind of branch, as i said in moscow , after all, apparently in working condition, but no decision is made, apparently. it is unlikely that it

will be accepted, but this is no longer our business, it is the business of our partners. that's what guides the head of one state or another, but that's their business. i have presented my version. it seems to me that this is precisely the crux of the problem. well , not all at once, please. who please? good evening vladimir vladimirovich , before your trip to kazakhstan, did you meet with the president of the dining arab emirates here the uprising with the president of turkey in what vein during these conversations the situation in ukraine was discussed perhaps the leaders of these countries shared with you some exclusive position of kiev that is known only to them and also the turkish press writes that ankara is now trying to organize negotiations between moscow and western countries usa britain france germany in istanbul how realistic this meeting is today, how

effective it will be, if it takes place, if kiev does not take part and how prudent it seems to you to involve in these negotiations. china and india thank you means, well , uh, as we know, uh, turkish president erdogan has already played a fairly prominent role in resolving a number of issues, including, let's say, related to exchanges. he was really involved personally in this work and e. there is a well-known result, so we are also grateful to him for this, because we received our military officers, including this first. second, he was an active participant in organizing the export of grain from ukraine right. yes to unfortunately, this grain does not go or in a minimal amount goes to the poorest countries of the world through the un. well, that's another question. we also discussed this with him, and in the course of our talks yesterday he spoke in favor of somehow structuring the flow of this grain and, above all,

sending it to the poorest countries. well, it's, uh, the general secretary should, uh, have to work on it. i know that he works, but he also succeeds in everything, which means, and the united arab emirates, of course, are also ready for a mediating role and, uh, and i must say that the president of the united hari emirates, he does this as well. you understand, with humanitarian issues, exchanges and so on. not without success, for which we are also grateful to him. india and china always talk about the need to establish dialogue and resolve everything peacefully, we know their position. these are our close allies partners, uh, and uh, we respect the position, but we also know the position. eh, kiev, they keep talking about the fact that they want negotiations and it seems like they asked for it, and now they have made an official decision, but which

forbids these negotiations. well, what can we talk about here, huh? in turn, as you know, speaking in the kremlin hmm at the time, when making a decision on the subjects of the federation, he just said that we are open. we have always said that we are open to us. we even reached certain agreements in istanbul. i told you that the agreements were actually almost initialing everything, as soon as the troops left kiev, the desire to conduct negotiations, the kiev authorities. it disappeared right there. that's all. e. well, here, if they are ripe for this, please then, probably, the intermediary efforts of all those who are interested in this will be in demand. yes, please. we continue the international theme. i'm yezhov vesti fm and mayak , is there any certainty about your trip to the g20 summit in indonesia and

if yes, uh, if you go there, are you ready to negotiate with the president of the united states in jabaid there? well, you have to ask him if he’s ready to hold such negotiations with me or not, i don’t see the need, to be honest, by and large , as long as there are platforms for some kind of negotiations no, e is not finally not finally resolved, more questions. mm. ah, my trip there, well, russia will certainly take part in this work. uh, in what format will we think about it, huh? about any direct negotiations, with any of the participants of the twenty, while there is no question, we are in constant contact with some of them. as you know, that's just what you were talking about position. uh, turkey and the turkish president of turkey also walk in the top twenty. we are in constant contact with some colleagues, too. but

such issues were not discussed with the president of the united states. good, yes? okay. good afternoon. by the way, the first channel of the federal security service recently reported that the explosive device that went off on the crimean bridge was originally sent by sea on a visible cargo ship and beyond odessa, this fact, how will it affect russia's position regarding cargo shipping and sports in ukraine will we we may be hindering him now, and most importantly, as far as the grain deal is concerned, because after all, the agreement was to carry grain, they will not destroy an explosive device. it was a terrorist attack made by the federal security service , which is most likely. uh, this is the so -called cargo, more precisely. e explosive substances were sent by sea from odessa. but it has not been precisely established. e. is it done with the help of grain trucks or not? this is a question of answering it. not

yet, but if the humanitarian corridors for the supply of grain to the poorest countries. although it does not go there, it was organized under this pretext. this work on it turns out that humanitarian corridors are used to commit terrorist acts, then, of course, this is a big question. uh, further functioning of this corridor. well , we don't have such data yet. you know what? well, the answer to a simple one will close a simple matter with an end, but uh, well, you must first establish this information reliably, no. please life a man was fined in moscow the other day for listening to ukrainian music. well, it seems obvious and too much, because so soon the film go to battle some old people can be banned, there are ukrainian motives and gogol but if the nazis listen to

folk songs, the songs themselves do not become fascist, what do you think and how should one treat ukrainian culture in general. i think that we all the time resent attempts to close russian culture to cancel it. this is complete nonsense. uh, like one of our musicians, fools mean something , uh, but we don't have to, like, act like that. uh, so, uh. hmm first second. the ukrainian language is one of state in the crimea in one of the subjects of the russian federation in the crimea ukrainian state language along with tatar here is russian, so in itself it is illegal, third. we have in russia, in my opinion, somewhere around 3

million citizens of the russian federation living permanently with us hmm in ukraine well, how can we ban their language of some kind? yes, we don’t have this in our heads, so i understand what it is connected with. it's emotional uh, emotionally in the background. here today's emotions are all happening, but i think that in many of our families they know, hear and love, uh, ukrainian ukrainian songs, ukrainian culture. u now in the soviet union, fucking very popular hits in the ukrainian language. and i think that we should not be like those, but which, as i have already begun, answering your question on the cancel. whatever culture you are, culture has nothing to do with it at all, if uh, if today's, uh, today's leadership in kiev considers it possible to support

neo-nazis, it is possible to support torch six in the center of their large cities, uh, and uh people, who walk around with nazi symbols, then this has nothing to do with ukrainian culture, please good afternoon newspaper. izvestia love wanted to ask about mobilization. you have already mentioned that during mobilization. there are many problems and now many companies do not understand which employees will hire which not, and which ones to ask. uh, should we expect a new wave of mobilization? will universal monetization and 300,000 people, which the head of the ministry of defense spoke about, is this still an actual figure or not, what 300,000 people, yes, about whom he spoke, the head of the ministry of defense is still an actual figure or not? yes, firstly, the ministry of defense at the beginning assumed

a lower figure. not 300,000 people first, second. uh, nothing extra is planned. i have not yet received any proposals from the ministry of defense for this. and in the foreseeable future. i don't see any need for something. uh, here's the thing about the stupidity that i said is connected with the old forms of accounting. some have not been updated for decades. and so, when they began to carry out these activities, rehabilitation only then it became clear what quality they are? uh, this is, uh, infobase. this means that it is updated on a modern basis on a modern basis, and it will be as reliable as possible, therefore, i think that the quality should also be increased, although i must say that it is work. uh, it's already ending, and now there are

22,000 people mobilized for the troops. out of 300,000 , i think that within, well, within about two weeks, all mobilization activities will be completed. please russia carry on, by the way, the topic here is we in kazakhstan are now here, as we know a lot of people who left after the announcement of partial mobilization of a certain number of them, if in other neighboring countries in russia they say different things, someone calls a traitor in the state duma they even offered to seize their cars . and here, how do you personally feel about those who, a, left the country after september 21. i would prefer to give not emotional, but legal assessments; in each specific case, a legal assessment of the action should be given. specific citizen. someone left because something is afraid, someone left because he wants to.

and that means avoiding motorization. someone else for some reason. in each specific case, it is necessary to give a legal connotation and act in relation to a specific person. only on this basis. well, it seems to me that there is no other way to do it. so, please, i beg you , here is a young man in a white shirt. thank you very much gleb ivanov now the first data on the dead , uh, mobilized uh soldiers in the chelyabinsk region, the authorities of the region have announced that several mobilized soldiers have died, and they are burying them in moscow today. uh, mobilized on september 23rd. he did not have an employee of the moscow government; he did not have military training. actually a question. how does it work, well, in

the definition of partial monetization. we said that all mobilized people will undergo mandatory military training. how is it that people they end up at the front even three weeks past since the announcement of mobilization, and in general, they die there. eh, and what do you think, the process of mobilization is going on right now. and there is one more question. let me talk about the crimean bridge. uh, after the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge from your point of view, here is how security measures are now being provided at strategic infrastructure facilities at railway stations at airports, and at the gas pipeline. at the power plants, can we protect them thank you, so in terms of mobilization i can to say again what i said before u line of contact 1.100 km, so u keep it exclusively on troops formed from contra formed from contract soldiers. moreover, while they take an active part in offensive

operations, it is almost impossible. this has to do with mobilization. first. the second all e, citizens called up as part of the mobilization must undergo training, a and she e, is as follows. so, i said 22,000 troops are now. more precisely, the so-called parts of formations. here there is primary training from 5 to 10 days, then they enter directly, depending on the military registration specialty, they already enter combat units and there training is from 5 to 15 days, then the next stage is already directly hmm in the troops taking part in hostilities and there additional coordination, but if you look from the beginning of mobilization to today, in principle, if you

look at the minimum values, then in general. uh, it's possible and not only possible, that's what i said 220000 22.000, we have in the troops to form them means 33.000. uh, the person mobilized is already in the subdivisions. and 16,000 are in units involved in combat missions. but if such questions arise, which have now been formulated for you, i additionally, uh, there are instructions to the security council. there are, uh, military people with these security features who previously served in the ministry of defense with good experience, who know their business, and are high-level and class specialists. errands for the ladies to inspect how

mobilized citizens are being trained. colleagues, let's make the final one already. the issue is also a lot of time, so as not to abuse. and it is provided, well, of course, after the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge, of course, the relevant service received the task to strengthen control in order to ensure the safety of all critical infrastructure facilities. and for everyone. corresponding traditions should also be held at them at power generation facilities, and at different levels of different classes at transport facilities. well country with big. let's hope that the work in this direction will be effective. until now, we have managed to do this, we managed to do it, please, kommersant e. do you think after all

ukraine will be able to exist as the state of russia and the second question. uh, vladimir vladimirovich, you don't regret anything, uh, i want to make it clear. e hmm what's going on today is not pleasant to say the least, but it's all the same. we would have received a little later only in worse conditions for us. that's all. so what's the action right and timely. will ukraine exist will ukraine be able to exist as a state? can you russia but we were not going to set ourselves the task of destroying ukraine no, of course, they took 2.5 million people in crimea at one time , yes, they took 2400, i will cut it off well , the troops had to go in and open the water in crimea here,

as a simple example, uh, the logic of our actions would not have been done. this action would not have been in other counteractions. the bridge has been blown up. now we need to think 10 times, and providing a message with crimea by territory, how important is it for the russian federation, you understand, yes, efficiency? how do you assess their effectiveness and what is the probability that such massive strikes will still have to be delivered. well now there is no need for massive strikes. now there are other tasks, because in my opinion. in my opinion, there are seven 29 objects there, which means that they were not hit, as it was planned by the ministry of defense, but they are getting these objects gradually and there is no

need for massive strikes, but in any case for now, but we'll see. thank you very much everything. thank you. well, let's, the final one is good, the final one. yes, thank you very much news. ah, nato says directly that the defeat of ukraine will be a defeat for the alliance. what do you think? eh? is it possible that nato is leading troops to the territory of ukraine if the state of affairs on the battlefield for kiev becomes catastrophic, you know, right? this is a question of concepts, a question of legal technique. what is the defeat of ukraine, everyone can understand it differently. here's what uh, crimea became uh, a subject of the russian federation in 2.000 there in the fourteenth year this defeat or what, what is it? here you need to understand what it is, but in any case, the introduction of some troops into direct contact in direct uh, direct

clash with the russian army. this is a very dangerous step that could lead to a global catastrophe. i hope that those who speak about this have enough sense of reason not to take such dangerous steps. thank you so much. best wishes. russia tv channel continues eat. my name is maria sittel hello so vladimir putin's press conference has just ended in astana following three major international summits and a number of bilateral meetings. here are immediately a few questions the president was asked to partly mobilize hunting for what the president answered. we will return a little later, but now about the past eventful day in the capital of kazakhstan, which for a while became a real center of world

politics arrives at the summits and vladimir putin manages to talk about something with alexander lukashenko even before the start of the meeting, then on the go exchanges jokes with president tokaev and finally, the main round table meeting talks about the economy , celebrates the successes and growth in trade, but does not forget about the problems on the eve of the cis, vladimir putin was an intermediary between the presidents of tajikistan and kyrgyzstan; now he is offering new negotiations or boors to aliyev and nikol pashinyan.

against the backdrop of russia's mediation efforts, it is all the more strange there are statements from france where president macron almost accused moscow of inciting hostility between baku and yerevan france over e, the results of october 6 believe that these statements they lack an understanding of that year of the conflict, the lack of information about relativity. it may be, we are still good that alexander

lukashenko said today that the collective west wants to break up the cis space into zones of influence and thereby weaken the commonwealth and the host of the program, the moscow kremlin and putin pavel zarubina in an exclusive interview with belarusian. the leader spoke about the introduced mode. who on the border with ukraine has introduced such an increased tourist danger regime, so we have begun procedures with the deployment of an allied group of troops, which, as i said, is the army of belarus, which will be supplemented by parts of the russian federation so that, including your neighbor ukraine, declares and even praises at the official level that they are de facto members of nato, how do you perceive this? uh, we don't take it at all. eh, wishful thinking can be passed off. in general, it doesn't really bother us. although they are members of the emin, but

the lord is with them, with all the ensuing, of course, consequences at a meeting of the council, all the heads speak russian as a working language for the cis bodies next year 23 and it is completely declared the year of the russian language of the strange commonwealth is symbolic that by its start we come up with a new interesting project proposed by the miller. such is the president of kazakhstan to you, and the creation under the auspices of the cis of an international organization for the movement of the russian language. naturally, we will provide maximum assistance to the implementation of this initiative. i want my colleagues to pay attention. it really is not some kind of preparation. this is really the idea of ​​the president of kazakhstan, he shared his proposal with me a little earlier, but, of course, er, russia cannot but support this initiative for the same twenty-third year, st. petersburg was declared the cultural capital of the cis and vladimir putin invited his colleagues there to the new year.