meeting up with friends or colleagues? a solemn ceremony of canceling a postage stamp with the image of the motor ship mustaim took place in moscow today. the event was held directly on board the cruise ship, which is named after the classic of bashkir literature. it was launched in 2019 and became the first passenger ship built at a russian shipyard over the past 60 years . souvenir stamp. today, 120,000 postage stamps with the image of the liner will be received throughout the country. mustai, karim with the name mustai karimov, of course. we very much hope that this will serve as a reason for interest. both the liner and the candidacy heritage of my grandfather. today the motor ship mustai karima went on another

cruise, plus you can also take a trip to st. petersburg , kazan nizhny novgorod tver and uglich on it site smotrim.ru, and by this time we had everything with you denischikov. see you. good afternoon. this is a program who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio dmitry kulikov german defense minister christina lambrecht asks switzerland

to abandon neutrality perhaps, as well as the concept of neutrality. in principle, as biden said at a meeting with the leadership of the penzakon, the world is changing, and the united states strive to continue to play a leading role in the world through diplomacy, with the support of the best armed forces nothing new , much more can be done with a kind word and a gun. eh, than with just one kind word, american folk wisdom says so. well, the president. the press secretary will have a genre new concern. we are concerned that moscow may be advising the iranian authorities on how best to deal with the protests. this is a quote

in which jean-pierre sees the way of rapprochement of iran and russia and russia are advising iran on how best to quell the protests, but the command, as they say, but it seems that the real concern of the us is growing in connection with the threat of nuclear conflict. yes, many are starting to reach. why did we supply weapons against a nuclear power, somehow so far sluggishly, but slowly they begin to think, here, listen to what tucker carlson of hollywood says about this a lot of stories about nuclear war and right now we are on its threshold, it's okay. it wasn't just a nuclear war . newsweek has been around for 80 years. for example published an article titled these foods are necessary to survive a nuclear war in the united states oh, but when you're in the supermarket. you don't think what kind of food i should buy to survive a nuclear war 60 years after

the cuban missile crisis, the nuclear danger from the war in ukraine is much more serious than experts thought. no, really, we help the ukrainian people and make sure that the war continues. as long as possible, until we get directly to nuclear war, if more disgusting person than the cure. in the meantime let's put all the dissenting americans in jail so we can get a sense of where we're headed tonight. it is with honor that we present to you the lieutenant of the criminal investigation department. daniel davis senior scientist in charge of defense priorities. he joins us tonight daniel davis is great. thank you for coming people seriously say. in terms of the use of nuclear weapons in ukraine, this is not the army in which you served. do n't i never think i'd live to see to see how people calmly throw the phrase about nuclear war. nothing to worry about, in fact , when i served, each of us knew perfectly well that we need to avoid this at all costs. and actually, that's what the whole

idea of ​​mutually assured destruction was supposed to provide, but it all went wrong all our governments in the hated councils or the united states that were bitterly opposed to each other understood perfectly well what to avoid for their own safety, but it seems that now this gone. we somehow managed. forget it a couple of days ago. i wrote that the current administration is pursuing a policy that, logically , cannot be implemented without a serious risk of nuclear war on the one hand. they say, we are going to help ukraine no matter what the cost and as long as it is required, but on the other hand. we understand that if this policy were successful, and russia was really in danger of being ousted and conquered. that the likelihood of vladimir putin's desperate launch of nuclear warheads would be extremely high, so if the biden plan succeeds, then the risks will increase, we cannot go down this path, nothing in ukraine is worth the loss of even one american city. it's amazing that this is not a national topic. fox cheney, has not participated in a single fistfight in her entire sad life, however, she and her like

are called pro-putin everyone. who raises such questions. have you ever seen our country in such a zombified state, we are inexorably moving towards the apocalypse, and no one talks about it, you know what i hear it all the time about anyone who proposes a reasonable security policy for the united states of america is spoken of as putin's agent but here's the thing, our government should ensure the security, protection and prosperity of our country. and if their policy jeopardizes that , then we need a new policy. i don't understand why people suffer. believe it. they hate the ukrainian people who dragged us into this war, and so do i, of course. i care about the ukrainian people more than others, but we must end the war and prevent its escalation. this is our primary goal. that's interesting, yes, it took 8 months for the idea to work. well, somehow they connected a and b with elementary logic a nuclear power, comparable to the united

states in a number of estimates, russia's nuclear power has superiority in this component seriously over the united states, is it possible to defeat such a power now? no one asked this question right away, but now they began to ask this question because, well, that's what they understand, but russia can't be defeated. russia will take many more steps. how long does it take for the problem with ukraine to cease to exist for russia. and if we raise the degree, well, then we will get not they would agree. well, so that russia would use it against ukraine, and then they would lead everything, but even against europe, so that russia would use it, and then they would, well, they would look at it and condemn it. well, in general, it was not a pity. well after when they are completely they will rob, but they do not agree with everything, and now this risk begins to reach them. what if it's for us and here

, in the ukrainian proverb, and at the expense of us. well, it's interesting to write or very popular about these iron thrones of dragons, this martin yes , in my opinion, his name is also joking. here this topic it is interesting that the theme of the past week is cross-cutting. they stream shows go by publications and so on. all the time with this topic, look. romania partitions, what will we do if putin really uses a nuclear bomb, what will we want to do? i wish i had a dragon that i could fly to the kremlin, but such black black humor, yes, a great bone writer. well, you know, you can see the script, as even the expert was promoted, says the right things. in fact, he is confused. we hate the ukrainians who dragged us into the war. no, it is your government, including the ukrainians, that dragged the war in, and it is precisely to many that it probably dawns that this informational rhetoric is in a playful form in different forms. it is primarily aimed at

the fact that this is a provocation at some point in time will become inevitable and the fact that we have now played ahead of the curve and the fact that i understand that we are there, in parallel, another process is going on. more and more voices. and let's negotiate more and more voices. and let's agree, more and more experiences. what if, god forbid, this european unity in relation to ukraine will fall apart. and suddenly, god forbid, the republicans. now they will win and stop giving. money feels like this this is a provocation with a dirty bomb - this is the only thing that this the clan of beneficiaries will be allowed to keep this process, or maybe take it to a qualitatively new level and we should calculate in advance. and i think what happened without further ado was the public statements yesterday on the exercise. we just showed what will be the answer to any of your all these provocations. i think you haven't shown everything. well, i think yesterday was enough. yes, just judging by the rhetoric in the comments, it is on social networks, because there is no point in watching the official media. i think that for many came. well, it’s interesting to recall putin’s words

a few years ago, because here we often talk about these decision-making centers, how the president then uttered this phrase, then everyone didn’t get this phrase to anyone, anywhere, so it was then sent very specific. it seemed like a big military conflict and questions of the use of nuclear weapons, because the president then said that, uh, if there are provocations by some countries against us and the war is conventional, but this does not mean that we will use our funds for these countries only. no, we will apply them directly. uh, in those centers where decisions were made, and looking at the current situation in ukraine, at the poles, at europe, which is not at all sovereign units, but to a greater or lesser extent, puppets are waging war against russia and it is declared so, one must remember what the president said then, yes, let's not forget

that the situation in ukraine is everything that is happening now. this is part of a global process. fight for dominance. america is constantly trying assert themselves in one form or another, and it is quite clear that the ukrainian people are something else for them, it does not matter. there have been such cases in history, because there is a war in vietnam , let's say. it itself was not, so to speak , the vietnam war. it was a war of confrontation, where we came out victorious, the same applies to syria, the same applies. iraq , same goes for afghanistan, but here's what's going on. the thing is, we're quite right about that rhetoric in the united states. states of america, but such a profound process is now taking place there that one should really be afraid of this. i am now preparing materials for one article for a foreign journal on the subject, in principle, of the education of the graduate school of universities. and so i say, now i just looked at the publications, which were mostly harvard and princeton a little bit

stanford. so now the class. now even american specialists. they say that this triangle, where they were concentrated university centers that were the center of political discussions of social discussions, i myself was there, i myself took part in the work, then we were invited there as a journalist, podnalists in russia, so, now they say what it has become. e massachusetts is not athens is not massachusetts athens is ambassadorial sparta, what is meant by athens is politics, philosophy, sociology is, so to speak, peaceful conversation and peaceful discussion, and sparta is warriors. now they have turned both harvard and spruce. mm massachusetts institute technology. they have now turned into such a research and production, sparta, what i mean, oddly enough, it is there that the headquarters of so many corporations are concentrated . general dynamics walki. everything is going on there, they are now giving billions of dollars in grants for research, and they have drawn in a huge circle of young people. uh, specialists are

now on the development of artificial intelligence. a robotic technology is all that itself against the air defense system. right now, this huge cluster is working to create and u improve the war machine for america and see how they react when they say she us they say we kind of get ready. we are preparing. we have military rhetoric. i looked at these scientific studies began in 2002, even earlier. and now, throughout all this time, america has been purposefully investing colossal funds in scientific research precisely in these institutions, changing, in fact, the face of america itself . america is now turning from political affines into political sparta. and this means war. well, beautiful of course, about sparta. well , yes, sparta. well, how far away, yes, it is, but in principle, far away. this is a very conditional, very conditional metaphor, of course, but about the fact that we are preparing. here, let's listen to colonel baggregor

. if you suffer, big losses and it will be seen that we will lose. will we then turn to nuclear weapons, because, as i have repeatedly said. i have never seen the interest of the russian side in the use of nuclear weapons. i did not see anything that indicated? it's all made statements have always been made in response to us. anyone who wondered about nuclear attacks. and they i created to understand what the answer is and that's the problem with limited nuclear war. well, i think the danger now is that we are approaching this, we are not ready. this is what happens regardless of your readiness. and we're not ready, we don't have the necessary infrastructure at hand. no, he's ammo size force doesn't make any sense. i mean, we keep saying that the russians were stupid when they went

there, they made all these mistakes, but at least they led part of the army there in order not to kill their fellow orthodox slavs. this was their goal. they didn't want to kill anyone. maybe things didn't turn out quite the way they expected, but now that we're discussing intervention, we don't have any guidelines or restrictions, and we don't have power. and now we say that the russians are building up their forces. and this is the reason. this place is the size of verses, if you don't have a few hundred thousand soldiers, you can't prevail there, how are you going to deal with it. i think it's crazy. well, by the way, mcgregor analyzes from the other side. yes well, they pulled it in well. well, it’s good that they didn’t let them end the war with small forces, uh, and end the war with small actions once. uh, at the very start, he broke off the negotiations for the second time. well, well , they raised it all to the level. e above, supporting the total mobilization in ukraine, not by pumping up its

weapons, but russia has overcome all these levels and any analyst will say that it can still have several levels in this word. and what are we then when everything it will be collapsing, we will use nuclear weapons about the same asks magicians. it's just a mirror of the issue from the other side further. you know, uh, it's not only mcgregor, but other statements that we're talking about here, of course, it would seem that we should all be inspired by the idea that, as it were , dmitri himself at the very beginning speaks about what is starting to happen there . some rethinking. as far as i understand you, i would not say big words, in any case, ask something there. you know, i'm built quite pessimistically. to me it also seems that, and this hmm is not even a rethinking, but an attempt in some way, but to reflect on this is to analyze. it is not yet

available, because dozens of votes that do not get into the brackets remain outside the brackets. here, who perceive it all in a completely different way, who put the blame on russia, and of course, the worst thing is that this topic is here. she has already entered into everyday life, indeed , she no longer discusses there, what products are there and others, and so on, you understand how it is, really. eh, a very serious problem. and uh, president biden, in fact, when he started the sanctions war with russia in february. what he said, he said, either a nuclear war or a nuclear war or a sansa war, and now two letters are left in this, and that is, there is a war of sanctions and a real threat of nuclear war, and in this sense, president biden. i think that the war with sanctions is a defeat. yes, they lost, look. here. i think we can say this quite clearly. i think that american experts

would also rarely agree with us. that's what president biden allowed, here is the promotion of this topic. yes, this problem. here is evidence to such a scale that he can be the most anti-american. president in us history why because, uh, rafael talked about the war , do americans assume that americans should not suffer in a nuclear conflict? you see , not a single city, not a single one, please let hundreds of millions of hundreds of thousands of people die there, somewhere far away, but this should not be asked to fall on america, and the fact that president biden is already makes newsweek magazine. uh, seriously talk about how american, and the layman will survive in a nuclear war. this is very un -american, because americans have always ruled out the possibility for themselves to suffer, and in this sense, of course, yes, he is an anti-american president and kennedy moved away from this line in his time and in a different way and in a different way. -other more.

uh, the question was not raised, and finally, too, but the doctrine of containment. you are talking about teaching. yes it would seem convincing all this does not work, because it's all perceived. thanks to these media, you understand how some cartoons, how some horror stories, how something so virtual, non- existent, this is the problem. the doctrine of containment was based on fear. i'm afraid of you. you're afraid of me i have. it's all you have, and now we're demonstrating. it's all real. this is very serious, but they say, yes, what is it, in general, this this this does not scare us. this is the problem, that is, such a conceptual vacuum. you see, here is such a hmm funnel that whether, arose, which is impossible to break through it in any way. this is the difficulty to break through. only the form will be possible. i don't see it that way. what they had. uh, the calculation initially that russia would collapse from the inside, that is, everyone did not know about the nuclear potential, but they expected that this would not be

used, because russia, in the course of the contradictions of the economic pressure of the struggle, cast, the masses of everything that they spoke about would self-destruct and they have the same valuable thinking of our pale-faced brothers. they succeeded once in the soviet union. well, logically, they did the same thing it should have turned out similarly, first let me remind you, we trained in belarus from before, well, according to our scheme how from georgia well, she’s just the closest ally, so it was clear. uh, they were not initially afraid of those who conceived a nuclear war, but they came from the fact that they need it in europe about it. by the way, friedman spoke back in 1915, because there is no greater incentive for people with capital. move, well, than to scare? why should he move from this beautiful place where he used to to live it is necessary to frighten him to such an extent, and i see this on the one hand. this is a game about scaring the layman, but on the other hand. not all of them are exposed to propaganda. and here are those who reached whom. this thought about her at the expense of them

actually now breaks down. uh, a propaganda picture of victory. well, because i remind you since august, in the entire western well, the press of the media, that is, for the whole society, was just like a total victory for ukraine. yes , ukrainian society broke first in the middle september. ah, western society. they are catching up with this process, so a difficult one lies ahead. well, we are already using this as a tool, that is, and after it, reflection can already begin for those who are smart. yes, well, because, well, this process can occur, because the radiation proportion is the most terrible. well, what we saw, they believed for half a year that the sanctions were delivering us. six months have passed , some began to make sure that this did not happen in the process, but still. uh, the fact that the sanctions will not name us, they understood by the end of april. here's the one the moment they came out they all announce that there will now be victory on the battlefield. it was understanding. well,

what was the victory on the battlefield calculated on that russia would act in the same mode as it started? well, that is, a limited contingent with sparing methods, and so on and so forth. what became clear in september was that russia would change, as i even said, that russia would change the methods of warfare if it happened. russia changed them. and not completely yet. i don't know what is not completely. she's still in the same word, right here may add more. and the victory on the battlefield dissolves away, like water disappears through the finger into the sand. there is no victory on the battlefield. and there is the question that they are actively discussing it further, and those who have some other logical operators and who at the same time also want to move the canoe to the face . yes, they say, well, i'm sorry, but now let's move on to the next level, then another one

will end, than well, let's already discuss how it will end, because this is the way. well, it is impossible to turn it off if you continue to walk along it, here the only thing they say so far, here, well, those who are looking for reason. but i'll start really simple. here we are constantly talking, linking the crisis with the events in ukraine with a special military operation. this is methodologically not entirely correct, not a special, military operation, not sanctions are the cause of the global crisis, but the global economic crisis that has been going on since 2008, at least. it started early now on asdak. and just passing into the next phase became the cause of the events in ukraine and many many other things in this world. everything depends on the tasks. yes indeed they are very cool. miscalculated in one it can be seen, well, with the naked eye. we all remember well the biden of the dollar for 200 rubles.

but we have one problem. and not only with us, but with all of humanity, including, by the way, biden us. it's not from the ceiling. he took it so the assistants considered it according to the methods by which the national financial regulators work on the only one. we also live according to these methods until now. we must clearly understand this, and this is the danger, because they will escalate up to the solution of the tasks of the habitual exit. through the uh through the war out of the economic crisis. it is familiar to the western world, it is so arranged. this is what the historical experience of the second world war tells us about in terms of the economy. all understood. this is a way out of the great depression, including exactly the same product - and here they will escalate until the solution of their tasks. what i'm afraid of here is another terrifying task that they set for themselves. i mean our american partners and europe

really lost their subjectivity, they can be excluded for equalization. eh, but these ones will escalate to the solution of their tasks, and the task before them is, apparently, unsolvable. and this is the great danger of nuclear war. they are in these little things, about which we like to talk, in this, they will be forced, based on the logic of mathematical economic logic, to escalate the situation, but at the same time they don’t already have yes, and we also have methods of honoring the economy, the stock exchange, like pricing centers do not work dollar at 200 rubles. we everyone has seen financial international economic institutions refuse to work. yesterday, one of our biggest oilmen said guys and the market. even already a world-class tag, glory. the national god is still regulated. it is no longer global, so we are entering a time of uncertainty in which they are completely, based on their logical ones. uh, constructions can bring us

to a global world war. i would not like it very much , and i have the only hope that there are still some at this level contract elements. i don't just say that all the time. i cite this example, that in december last year, the heads of the five leading nuclear powers. uh, russia usa china england and france not just out of the blue then zelensky fulfilled the vienna agreements. which one did they sign the declaration on non-admission of global nuclear war? this is one of my last ones in odessa, to be honest, yes, well, they signed it. well, you know, there is something the other side is ready, which mcgregor spoke about, the other side has a lot of things the americans signed in its history, beginning with treaties with the indians on behalf of the queen. it looks beautiful, but, uh, in all these scenarios, oh, which colleague, and dmitry spoke. uh, still was always missing in them. i mean, the way out through the war was missing

nuclear weapons and the ability to destroy. yes, there several times this planet and itself, it changes very much. in general, you know this logic of getting out of a big war, what do you turn to? they are in the first story just when e collen ducker spoke with his interlocutor, this is what they both said that, in fact, this question yes, about what's next. yes, dima is talking about something, it is not discussed. they are after all about this person who is trying to put the question. and what's next and follow this logic, about which you just spoke. dima, he's right there. uh, putin, spy, scoundrel scoundrels and conductor, so the kremlin propaganda. that's what, uh, the main thing now, that is, they are this question, which actually arose from the moment when the great european diplomats there began to talk about the fact that everything will be decided on the battlefield, then very, directly visibly the question arose. and how will it end, and

how do you imagine victory over a nuclear power on the battlefield. it should look like, that is, what russia should at some point, yes, we lost, we really have nuclear weapons here a little bit. zakromat, but we will not use it, because, after all, the world is a pity, the planet is beautiful, so blue, they all imagine it . it's just you understand, and they ask this question. well, at the level of society there is not allowed. uh, in general, even discussing this, it seems to me, now. eh, the most important thing, because even in order for some kind of reflection to come, people have to. well, at least start talking about it. you know, lately i have talked a lot with our compatriots who live in different countries. uh, there's european in the us and so on. so that's just at this level. well , apparently, they are still our compatriots. they understand our mentality. they say, what are you, really, zhahnit? well, the truth will be, because, well, they are drugged with it. the russians are talking about it.

now tactical nuclear weapons, use is a must and they directly ask the question. and what, and what will you really be? and then what will happen or people at this level usually keep up the enthusiasm, because you see? i, well, what dmitry is discussing there is a problem, in another there is cotton wool wow. they do not believe in reality, well clash, unlike the caribbean crisis. it was clear there. well, because this clinton lord kennedy yes kennedy asked one single question correct to his military. you can guarantee that no bombs will fall on united states citizenship, no, we can't. thank you then turn around. well, well, that is, it's just a question of what's next, but you know the question, what's next can be asked in different ways. for example, blinkin also wonders what's next it would seem the same question. and here are some

curious conclusions. look, there is clearly competition. is there any competition? but what will the world look like in the future? we have indeed reached a turning point turning point since the post -cold war era. now there is competition for what comes next. he competes for what comes next. he's not well , there will definitely be something further, but everything is in the same logic that you imagined. well, well, uh, the world cannot be left without the united states if the united states does not lead the world, the world will die and it continues. this is only his third speech with the same words, so the answer to the question. well what's next there is everything will be america well, well, the american world will be preserved, you know, here, it seems to me, the question is also about readiness. we talk a lot, whether they believe or

not. but are they ready, if you look at the situation, they are trying to do absolutely everything only by proxy as publicly as possible in rhetoric, renouncing any case but they entered the situation consciously, they do n’t enter the situation themselves yet and i don’t have confidence in their readiness to use nuclear weapons, and in this regard, a nuclear provocation on the territory of ukraine, a dirty bomb, and so on, looks more than plausible to me. why? we forget that for 3 years non-systemic systematically created a nuclear repository on the territory of the chernobyl zone, there is no need to have a rocket with a nuclear charge, it is necessary that a rocket just fly there. and this is enough for this nuclear provocation, and then the information tools of blaming russia are important for them to hold the situation so that for the european continent, it is important that this does not affect them

; they are still ready to participate in this personally, to die physically. no , whether they believe it or not. this is the second question , the question of what further it will actually be classical, because i remind you that there are two types of empire colonial and continental, they are used to acting by colonial methods, when nothing happens to them, this and this is an ideology, then what he says, blinkin is an ideology because the us itself arose the same as we fled from you all the hated sinners. well, we have development, that is, it remained there. yes, in this sense, the old world, so this model, that is, they are just what, when the british used this model they actually threatened once, and the spaniards with their invincible armada, and it was very annoying. they even changed in culture. well, many things have been revised. ah, well americans are like little brothers there, i don't know the next branch. e british. they have n't been in this situation yet. the caribbean crisis in this case was rather an exception, than the rule, the calculation was that we would go to the

end, and in this case, well, we don’t see personalities similar to kennedy who could actually do it , well, a campaign against plaster casts of this very one. oh, well, that is, the decision to go against the powerful forces that are pushing you to a decision that you don’t. even if you don’t want to apply, you will still turn into a green one. yes, just move you to him. well, here's another calculation you understand. they understand that further, if you do not keep global domination, then fate very unenviable of all these families of corporations of clans of everything else, it cannot be restored. that is, this system cannot be reproduced in the event of the loss of world domination and the possibility of robbery, a return to 100 years ago, at least only one will have to. here are the blinkins, the real gang would follow him, the real gang would follow him and zabayden us. he reads, well, we have to take a chance, we'll put it on zero, we'll put everything in the heat,

because if you don't put nosoro, then we're kapets, we're bankrupt and we'll be hanged, at least they'll hang us like that. and so, it can happen quickly and not even you will notice you know, yes, indeed, and the question is posed point-blank about competition here, and blinkin is right that competition will indeed determine the development of the world, but what is the main problem of america, you understand, after all, any competition is a long game, you need to prepare for it. well, let's say, here is my dmitry or semyon yes, i know that these are my competitors, what should i do to win in this competitive struggle, i should study my opponent, and understand his weaknesses, think about what i can offer one that will give me will allow me to replay it. and what is america's problem? america does not want to invent anything in this competitive struggle. she wants to ride the old one. show me which ends, you know, in fact, both blinkin and biden, they squander. here is what was earned by their

predecessors. nothing new. they cannot offer, how they broke it on the knee, they are now trying to build europe and asia. this is an attempt to capitalize in this way. here, here is the american influence, which was not earned by these people, and these people look like temporary workers. and, of course, i do not see how they can win in this situation in this long game. for example, in china , for example, which is not just engaged in such confrontational rhetoric, which is very clearly preparing for these battles and studying the weaknesses of its opponent. i'll tell you how they are going to win, but one of the elements. look at e. hillary clinton long time no see her look. i know we are all focused on the 22nd midterms and they are incredibly important, but we also need to look ahead because you know that our opponents are clearly right-wing extremists

who already have a plan to literally steal the next presidential election, and they don't make a secret of it, the presidential election. 24 years may not be decided by popular vote. and not even she is a chronic electoral college. college, and state legislatures, many of which are controlled by republicans. but there is also good news. in the face of this very real threat the democracy indivisibles have launched the cap thefts to make sure we're ready to defend democracy in 24 , each of these races is highly competitive and your dollars could very well determine the winners of the next presidential election. it couldn't be more important or more urgent. no, now it will be in november and it's all bullshit.

it's all bullshit. everything will be decided in the twenty- fourth year, which means that you will have to hold power with you. whatever it is for us, and how it is necessary to live on the twenty-fourth level the twenty-fourth year, the most important one is for november, don't pay attention, because we lost, so don't look there don't look, but in the twenty-fourth we will return everything, yes, that's who, says hillary clinton who was in the thick of all the scandals of all the fraud all the frauds in the previous elections and before that, and she is still talking about it now. that's when you listen to it, when you listen, some in others. i still have a very pessimistic mood about the upcoming conflict. the fact is that we, of course, say and hope that at some last moment we will move away from the line, that some prudent forces will still be found. we listen to sober voices from america, but let's take a different look. now there are so many,

so many problems at stake that in the current west they cannot solve in a peaceful way. this is a consigliere of wartime, not peacetime. they can't say that now, somehow they can't solve inflation issues. they cannot resolve border issues. they cannot protect their own people. they can't protect their people on the streets of chicago new york, the war will write everything off and you know what it is. this is where the madness lies. it seems to me that they can go for this only because of this. let's put aside, you know, such demonic satanic, so to speak, perceptions. everything, this is an ordinary calculation, the war writes off absolutely and nullifies everything and in my opinion, these people are ready for it, yes, but here's how they bring it, they are not going to suffer. what is the question, do you understand? i don't have any. well, no relaxation about idealism, the attacker or his interlocutors. here, they are the same. they would say, well, yes, yes, just tell me how we expect to

survive. here's how it will be so that we don't get hurt, because now it's just been talking for a very long time about general poton, who says, first get into a fight, and then we'll see, and then eisenhower stopped me now eisenhower told me this, but this non-nuclear still works. yes, yes, yes, in my opinion, this was said by a certain napoleon. in general, well got involved some. yes, america's problem. now, if we talk about the problems of america at the present time, they are even somewhat different, but the problem is, how can i say, i go every year to fish in one in a small village away from her on the kola peninsula. so she is about twice as old as america, the umba fish is called a small regional center. here, so that we understand with whom we are dealing, these people are largely without historical experience, and that is why it is good that the catholic is important. kennedy asked this question. what will happen

next catholic biden? unfortunately, this question is already, but he can’t ask, but continue to escalate, as we said, including changing power in your country and leaving, if necessary, from a democratic form of government. don’t worry. they will do it easily. but just for 24 years, if they feel that they will lose, they will behave in exactly the same way as they are afraid that the russians will lead with a nuclear bomb. they are, uh, the problem here is that when there is a crisis, the system crumbles, everything crumbles, not only economy. your personnel policy is pouring in, because look at these shots on the same hillary before excuse darishans and without tears and take a look at our street. look. and you have army things pouring in the same way. even here, when well, we remember this whole situation with our komi, the systems have not been updated for eighty years. you think differently there, here you are mo- this gives us a certain chance that even if they want to, they will not be able to do it. and in

this there is a chance for humanity, by the way, from my point of view, oh-oh-oh, yes, you know, i would draw attention there in the un in the committee, which hmm the committee meeting was he, which is dedicated to space, there and so on there was a statement by our representative mead who said that american satellites, even if they are formally civil infrastructure, can become an object can become objects, and for legitimate military purposes. yes, because we see in this situation how supposedly the civil infrastructure works directly, yes, to the war. uh, here it is, the ukrainian army is there and they are simply participating in the war, so uh a lot is changing and for a lot uh, look. yes, there at some other angle, including on such things. i would like to add that it is important not that they are young, but that this is an empire product. it is capitalism and they do not see themselves differently. they arose within the framework of this and therefore everything

else is beyond their historical memory. this is very this is a very accurate remark too. you have only one type of social relations locally carved out, no others are given to you in history. yeah we trade we break on advertising immediately after it will continue we cannot be silenced. we ourselves choose our path, and we will defend our choice, our will not be broken. we face the truth every evening. don't miss the evening with vladimir solovyov today at 10:20 pm on the russia magnet channel, cosmetics care means to love energetik 999 dishware more discounts in my magnet application, the most profitable card for free forever cashback 3% and interest on the

balance yes gazprombank card yes the most profitable card design glass i really need these. how much does beauty cost such a ruble ruble glasses for a ruble such promotions i like to collect electronic stickers and buy designer glasses children need. well, a lot for happiness grass chopper and bushes ancient artifacts it has become even more. take advantage of payments at the birth of a child within the framework of the national demographic project professional foot skin care products with up to 50% discounts for you a pedicure at home

in 15 minutes on the birthday of the housing lottery million buy a ticket. everything can come true will open the door to your dream. here i fulfill my dreams on my birthday magnet, buy with our card. play in the app or register checks in the chatbot and win millions to make your dream come true. now many are putting life on pause due to rising prices with credit from sovcombank, make important purchases at today's prices and turn back on all your sovcombank plans people are more important than faberlic 25 years. and that means you want discounts okay, 60% discount, but lipstick well the kiss faberlik vk clips - this is the place meetings of millions of people, people who have something to show and people who have something to see. you

can scroll endlessly through the feed, choose your favorite categories, mark what you like. and what you don't like. and smart algorithms will select videos for everyone to taste. look, vkontakte clips or in the new separate application vk clips are a meeting place for impressions. open the m.video application and get 500 bonus rubles. it sounds profitable mildronate activator of my ability to work and mental activity mildronate i am able to do it offers its own conditions for mortgage insurance. compare will help not to overpay, buy or extend mortgage insurance with savings of up to 4,000 rubles. in one of the ten largest insurance companies on the site or in the application. if insurance, then compare choose better for the fulfillment of all our wishes for cinema on weekends to love such happiness. i don't

understand what kind of real relationship we have with you. and why then is all this wedding playing in love with lena for us, this is a profitable deal alexander makogon legal husband, heir too ruin, and then the murder. bring maria kulikova is also worried about getting out of here on saturday at 21:00 on the channel, russia

they call him nostradamus of the 21st century, a mathematician, a prophet and a real genius of our time humanity unesco scientists prophesied the date of the september 11 terrorist attack in new york ukraine why astrologers predicters consider 2025 a turning point in the history of russia malakhov today at 16:30 on the russia channel yesterday mallorca was killed in his own apartment, such a premiere on the russia channel we want from your street newspapers that your factory has collected for the front, missed half a million rubles from the head the

artist is leading today at 21:20 on the russia channel who is against on channel russia 1 we continue our discussion? well, you know, here's the topic that we discussed, and here's blinky delivering this speech. well , it’s interesting that the opposition to blinkin, for example, is already starting to build up in the united states. even right here on a comedy talk show, yes, here's a comedian, just discussing. he pay attention to the language, to the expression and to what exactly he is talking about. part of this is in the interests of ukraine and this is in the interests of the world community to protect, as the secretary of state said, an international order based on rules. rule based means we didn't

follow any rules. when we invaded afghanistan i occupied it for 20 years. we didn't investigate no rule based order when we invaded iraq and killed millions of people. we didn't follow any basic order on the rules when we illegally bombed libya , bombed it, turned it into a failed state. we didn't follow the basic law order when we came in and dropped 26,000 bombs in syria we didn't examine the rule based order. they call it a rule-based order , meaning that the united states rules the world. that's what, that's why you don't follow, no rules of order, it's all bullshit. now she has occupied three series, which are the oil part of us actually stealing syrian oil under what rules does it fall under and what did he say. listen to what he said means to keep the world under our control, and he just said it. if

you don't know what these words mean, here's what they mean, we're going to control the world, and that's why we're waging war in ukraine, interesting, true well, that is, here's the level of wording and the level of understanding of the things presented, first , , then we are going to fight in ukraine in order to keep the rules in reality. they install them, because in this idea, yes, and secondly, i wonder who the humorists in america say - this is a special caste yes, this is the voice of the masses. this is the voice of that same redneck, that is, krasnaya sheeva, which is the american hinterland, which, by the way, once voted for there, yes, and this enik said. you guys are tired. you are fed up with all these growing rules. you tell me how i will live, but the rules are far away, yes, and this is very important if there really are elections, which i am not sure about, but with

a colleague discussed this for the first time then, this may turn out to be more important than all the statements, the secretary of state there, not because the great truth is said there. although it is said there, but because the humorist said it. for america, this is still the same jester, but not with the queen of the people. here yes, you know something like this, dmitry is a counterthesis that will explain to him rarely yes, the red-haired one will explain the following: you live now. well, well, not very good, of course, but if we lose world domination, you will live 100 times worse. that's why what do you know, that's all, how do you live now? this is because we have the ability to rule the world by the rules, as soon as we do not have such an opportunity. well, that is, to rob, you know, we can not say politically correct, if we lose the opportunity to rob the whole world, you will stand dear, yes, but there is a peculiarity, you see, he

stopped listening. that is why he was elected at the time. there, in general, not everything can be native how to explain, for example, now the rates on a thirty-year mortgage loan have become 7% in united states in dollars. yes, that is, it is 1% higher than the preferential social mortgage in russia in rubles, so this is the moment that they said they needed february. and if you remember in 2008, by the way, how did the global financial crisis begin. it started just with anime and freddie the magician of mortgage lending agencies. plus, there is the climate brothers, they were not known for anything, except for their one and a half century history there. but these are the financial institutions that dealt with mortgage hmm and domestic ones. so to speak. and it is essentially a lifestyle, it is the philosophy of life of americans. and i think that here it will be very difficult to change somehow. why is life changing so drastically and why it will be impossible to provide this standard of living with high salaries, therefore, well, yes, there is, of course, the fact that oil is stolen there, for example, in syria it is still insignificant there, what they export there with these trucks, cisterns there. this,

of course, does not yet have a strong effect, but some moments have a very strong effect, which in the economy and crazy inflation is happening, while it's all going through, of course, corporations, especially in europe. by the way, we don't see it much. do you understand, do you think? is it that the state is mining, or something, american with the payment of tax? you understand that to take syrian oil - these are private sources of specific individuals without taxes, incomprehensible cost prices at all. so far, small volumes. it 's not very big at all. it depends on what scale, because if the medicine, if we are talking about ten specific individuals. that, maybe these volumes are quite sensitive. well, millions. i don’t know, well, you would have personal people, well, 300 million a year. well, in general, the order is this, but in terms of money, well, 300 million a year every year 300 million. it is necessary for 10 people. well , nothing is so normal enough to change

the world situation, you know, but i must say. the most important thing is that this discussion about the rules will not arise by chance, and these international rules are the main enemy of international law. it would seem that words with one root of law and rule, but the deepest crisis, for him and for all institutions , lies in the fact that, in fact, these are the international rules, which are not really spelled out anywhere. they devoured international law, for example, there is maritime law in accordance with which a ship may or may not enter some territorial waters, but here international rules come into play, some are not written. it would seem to remember international law, but may not be there, but according to international rules. it is quite there, maybe these rules were established. you are arbitrarily nowhere, not prescribed by the so-called responsible powers. in fact, they destroy the minimum possibility of somehow agreeing. and this is the main threat, the main danger, in fact.

yes, any of you have seen the list of international rules for children, it is nowhere. no, they understand. that car is right, which are bigger. here, then, look. don't even understand them. that's all according to the rules according to the right to say no one is going to negotiate. i will reassure you, the americans are not going to negotiate with anyone because any arrangements that have reality are like death to them. this means they cannot rob and create arbitrariness, and now they have reached such a stage in the development of their organism. that they can only live by carrying out arbitrariness robbery, according to its oil they cannot live on the ceiling. they are trying to agree on something, not international rules. you do understand the rules anyway. do you understand? that's how interesting. now they have a crisis in general, well, they have exhausted the record very strongly in terms of the depletion of oil reserves. i am

when i thought that when they start buying it, what will happen, well, with prices later, and well, this is a separate story. it's impossible to describe they don't have a diesel diesel disappeared in america, so it's interesting what is happening with hamai, haris, how her problems are the lack of a diesel engine and the issues of upbringing and education grow together in one speech. listen in america, 25 million kids a day go to school in a yellow school bus. today, 95 percent of our school buses run on diesel fuel, contributing to the very serious problems. which relate to health and learning ability. you understand how cool it is, if you remove, well, such a number of diesel buses, then it will get better, maybe, well, there will be

a freer market, what needs to be done, it must be said that a diesel bus is harmful to the health of children. well, not for us, we just need to remove these buses and that's it. well, the diesel engine will become bigger and healthier, it will improve . ingeniously, ostap bendera is resting. it's just that ostap bendera is resting and saying that he was a shamal of historical experience. but the united states has a huge practical experience in manipulation of revolutions , organization of coups. and what's most interesting is that when we do why does clinton say these are the elections? they don't matter. in general, elections do not matter. yes, they are a threat. if the system will collapse. here it collapses in the twenty-fourth. yes , for the electorate it is possible quite calmly to the floor that the electorate is indignant, and let's give them the republicans in a pair. let them go there. and the protest spirit will be removed a little, and all that there are some problems. yes, it’s not a question. let's instead of biden trump, that is and this game and imitation

constantly. i don't believe in objective real competition between these parties, presidential candidates , which can lead to some significant internal changes in the united states; the task is to preserve the system. it is just such methods that are solved and i do not exclude that they can organize a special purposefully. maidan , including inside the united states, because they know how to do it. they know how to remove this protest mood into the minority that has fallen onto the square, and when they talk about the topic, what are we there, but teach iran how to disperse boy protests. yes, you taught us all. you told the whole world and declared domestic terrorists imprisoned. why did you teach us all, we no longer need to share some experience with someone else there. he is brilliant from this point of view, so i still remain a supporter of the fact that this is a confrontation within the united states at the top, which is not banned in the media, which no one is imprisoned or attracted to. kills it all the same imitation of such violent political activity. look, after all, trump’s clan is imprisoned and

attract isolated cases, yes. well, in general , they put them in jail, but i understand technologically what you are even talking about, well, i agree that this is a technology. but factually, i can tell you that all the same, uh, the appearance of trump on the throne in the sixteenth year was a surprise. and what has changed, i'll tell you, i, to hell with nothing, there are no internal questions. the us has not grown together. wait wait. no. yes, i'm just saying, to hell with the swamp. no one will ever dry him up. nobody was going to cut corners. it's not about swamp. something else happened. they lost 4 years, 3 years 3 years of the war, they lost, because clinton weak provocation in the donbass and the entire ukrainian history e no later than the end of the seventeenth year. she was

elected on the sixteenth and would have been elected not later than the end of the seventeenth year. everything would be the same, only with more of their initiative and more of their animals. no, here, well, in my opinion, see less preparedness, because everything was prepared precisely during the trump period, moreover, under his publicity. no, we must end with ukraine must comply with the minsk agreements. this is what was pouring into the ears of the whole world, but what was actually being prepared was what happened now in my opinion. yes, do you have anything to discuss? i'm not saying it's exclusive. i'm right. yes, but there is definitely a field for discussion here. yes, the fact is that at least declaratively they talk about some of their rules, which, as we have already found out, no one has seen and no one even knows, but the situation is still aggravated by others. the fact is that this bandit attitude to international relations , a to extrapolated to the actions of the americans already in the illegal in the special sphere we just mentioned the theft of oil in syria, so far the american intelligence services and the military control

drug trafficking from afghanistan to absolutely all parts of the world. let's remember who participated in the attempt to overthrow the government of venezuela and most importantly. look at what's going on in saudi arabia right now, it's a very curious huge number of supposedly ex-military ex- operatives. they are now entering the service of the saudi regime, then the question arises there, and whose side will they take in the event of a conflict, which may be there gradually, it is usually, so to speak, this is the sending of brigades to solve some specific problems. they do n't even formally hide it anymore. these are some incomprehensible, so to speak, volatile groups that perform incomprehensibly. whose instruction. or maybe they don’t even follow any instructions there, therefore, when we talk about the danger of a war of conflict. we must not drop this creature either, because these people may in the informal sphere commit a provocation that will lead to horrific consequences. this is something new yes, a provocation, but here we always say so, a provocation a provocation for them a provocation is a permanent method of action, well,

from the unofficial, roughly speaking, i still put it up. america is doing everything through provocation. let's start from this. just uh. i'm still talking about america not being a great specialist, there, uh, and even a political scientist, but simply as journalists. yes, and as an observer i will say. i still see a very serious split in the american a society that does not begin and end with the struggle of the elites there and so on. it is clear that there are, uh, some plans that they made, if we say in ukraine that there is inertia. oh yes, there is an average level that was given a task, and he continues under clinton under biden under trump, he continues to do what he thinks, but that's not the point here. eh, yes, there is continuity, so to speak. uh, politicians, there republican democrats and democrats republicans and so on the question is. it takes place in the country itself, and it really uh. it was visible, in fact, even 10 years

ago, yes, as if you were closely following what was happening. just by reading the press. e, analyzing some events, whether it be e confrontation. yes, about the monuments to the heroes of the south, as they call it, or a question of colored people? yes, there , uh, this is a movement of black rebellions, and so on, in many ways, in many ways. he sees this split in directions, and moreover, this split is so serious in its time. there, in the history of the same united states of america, it merged into such e, bloody confrontation. e, which, by the way, had a very strong impact on the domestic and foreign policy of the united states of america. i would take into account and agree with a lot of what the guests said too, but i still would not omit it. this is a very serious argument a few words in favor of the channel. harris would say such a canoe was called thirty years old. the great president, uh, she really understood a deep topic, she just said very briefly that the diesel buses are really new with new

engines. they really are. here, according to doctors are much more harmful to children's health and cause cancer. that is, it is true, but here, too, russia can help them supply our kamaz aliazov electric buses to solve these problems. so here we can be ahead of the planet by the broad moscow. yeah , uh, the us crisis began in the sixties. and we are just now, apparently, the result of a country that has been splintered since then and has been glued together thanks to subsidies to the population. the donation money has run out. it seems to me that what you said is very important. our discussions with konstantin e. there is one moment. here it is essential, you understand, the unity of political technology, amazing everything for sure, but to bring through the technology to some unity. it is possible only in conditions of an excess resource, when you buy everything, you need to buy the loyalty of these, you need to buy the loyalty of the masses,

you need to buy the loyalty of a group and grouping, and for the first time in its history of the 20th century, the united states entered a situation of a scarce resource. and what to do with it? they don't know they can't today. that's it, watch the program right now and see you soon. the information service of the russia tv channel continues its work on the air, you watch the news. my name is maria sittel hello, in russia, the status of volunteer formations is legally fixed.