do they have a wedding? i drink so listen.

my god, notes where does it come from? there is even a house painter here. this is a trophy, but of course i was. light , why? well, i asked you not to. well light i can. happy birthday mom. thank you who is this? i

'll go take a look. happy birthday i know it's indecent to ask, but i only heard you. so i thought, a holiday, a good reason to get to know you, get to know your mother. thank you sasha. you come in only we have a holiday, then no. yes, it's too late. now for the guests something like that is not. now i will arrange with everyone to the house. here they are let's call. hello that tatyana vladimirovna birthday. she doesn't celebrate. that's

your name, cloudy, so, dear cloudy, dedicate yourself. what kind of person would refuse the holiday correctly for tatyana, so you can just sanya nikolai here you are nikolai how do you feel about tatyana matvina happy birthday? so they didn't invite us. want to? but why would i be so glad, can i have a minute? true it is necessary to change here are the words of a true birthday man. you can

, of course. that's what kolenka got, it's supposed to. i understood, but in general, i learned how to cook autoshkente, what kind of greenfinch tomatoes, spices, seasonings, yes, you know, you go through the market, and smells. and what kind of cakes are hot then? seated actually, i have an apartment, if that. if anything, this is no longer your apartment, understand? and here at all no one will stop. you are not, comrade. well, what kind of squabbles during decent events birthday birthday here tatyana you'd better tell

us why don't you celebrate your birthday? sasha yes, by the way, i asked a couple of times silent like a partisan is silent. well, come on, if it's true, don't ever celebrate. i haven't celebrated since my husband died. on this day he died. well , he must have loved you very much. and light too. it's good when there are such husbands, right? happens let's

that's so good. no, no, that's it . happy birthday. happy birthday. health svetlana told me that you play the violin very well. maybe you will play, and we will listen. brilliant brilliant play. i

gave you such a tool to download. download, please, however, not everyone appreciated my gift. yes okay

bitch, no, no, it's not necessary.

i'm sorry. i just enjoyed it, don't give a damn about it. what's wrong with you? now, i see that it's not the golovachs. do you think you know me well? better can i ask you a question? how did your father disappear? sorry heart.

well, at first i cried. then she got angry with him. then he started talking to him. he asked why did he leave me ? then there were other questions, how to live? what to do? i talk to him every day now. he said about you. okay, really. and how did you approve?

peter is a special city here natural ingredients savory additives and quality control make chocolate special from taste to packaging special from peter with love alexander in a multi-part film soon on your screens so that the taste of our nuggets is thus we use only 100% chicken breast meat without hormones.

you are at the forefront of fashion stylish jacket for winter weather, buy for five-ten-nine. this is austin, this is about you like it, sotrsburger for 159 rubles. coupon, 22 stressful situation. i recommend magnesium khillatovalar. magnesium hiltovalar is better absorption and convenient intake of just two tablets a day instead of the usual six, magnesium hylate and valar are better than magnesium in stressful situations. we can help you find a job that will become part of your life. finding a lot of work always requires emotional strength. and here it is important to support a person in this situation. it seems to me that the profession is very important and the desire to be in demand in the search for a job a person needs a person. russia job employment center your job. your work, even i am konstantin ivlev. not i know how to improve this taste in a delicious point using 100% chicken breast meat, so you feel the taste of chicken and nothing more. try

chicken. and tasty and the point delicate ice cream in exquisite chocolate glaze is a pure line of unrealistically delicious ice cream. when diseased joints become an obstacle for a comfortable life, use antenna preparations that bioactively solve joint problems and take care of you, as the active preparations are closest to you. triple your favorite strips two slices of cheese on a big ruddy bun, our biggest fixer with a burger from 249 rubles. only in kfcony do they

capture and block odor molecules. they're just disguising them. that's what imbuilding freshness sounds like. now choose chicken hit or double cheeseburger for only 85 rubles. only in the application is tasty and alice point where it is cheaper to buy scandinavian-style furniture. goods at the best prices choose what you like in sofa.ru with kandy sale with discounts up to 50%, and alice will help

you buy where it is cheaper. but little by little it's not business, but to take a loan with state support and produce more goods. here is the case in the center. my business is assistance in obtaining preferential loans and other measures to support entrepreneurs, at the center of my business is a big deal for small businesses, a juicy, whole chicken cheeseburger from 89 rubles. the flame belongs to me woman to you heart of parma a year ago did not become an actress valentina malyavin her life was full of incredible events and mystery. even her death became a mystery to everyone on the other side. she is cremated. she had everything dizzying novels, loud, nationwide love movie, but a tragedy happened, a mystery that has not been solved so far, and she

redeemed. i think all my troubles like no one else today for the first time. what happened to valentina malyavin in prison. malakhov tomorrow at 16:30 on the russia channel and when there is an opportunity, well, this is a process, 12. 35 absolutely rudakov secret absolutely

no one outsider was said to be andrei sergeevich not an outsider. this is sanya sazonov from mur. he was doing death's head leads, and i thought. not at all. do you understand that if i did not know you, you fool, you would have thundered a long time ago, do you understand? yes sir. ah, if you understand. so no more initiative, everything is through me. clear. now sit down. and tell me in detail. about your friend sazonov, look

prudakov, you know it’s okay, he was always such a good guy, his father is some kind of bump, but he is not complete about it. well, maybe he's some kind of special and so on. well, then the paths diverged. hello hello, zdarova is not up to you

now. i owe you defense always my debts pay. okay, let's go to the office, i'll tell you there, just quickly. thieves' common fund is returning to moscow from ur, people say, i listen to everything, thieves' gold, can you imagine? when the time and place is known. but not for me, if i had known, i would have been there a long time ago. joke people say they know,

only liver lips, no one else, not a single living soul. i tell you the pure truth, i tell you, purely by the cable of the komsomol member. so come on, if anything, you know, what kind of conversation are you? captain, i'll come right away and tell you everything. what are you? you need to get married captain. no, honest word, if you want to get married, i'll give you my daughter young love will work for you , and the eyes are such goodbye, then goodbye later. we take to the common fund and to the wedding. yes

, you go. so sure it's transparent. listen, but if i were the leader of the head, i wouldn’t have missed such a jackpot, you can pull immediately in an hour you won’t find the ends, the common fund will leave, how to drink listen, well, the transparent one was obviously not going to football, and we didn’t need a liver, and the exact information about the return of the thieves' boiler, but the language. how do we all think, right? is there any logic? well, of course there is, while we're fiddling with this confectioner, we'll miss everything. and transparent after such an action, he will leave moscow

okay, i agree, from now on your task is to find out to the square centimeter where and when the common fund will arrive clearly so exactly. here it is safe to know the ears of the enemy can be anywhere. it's safe here. i actually wanted. can you give me a gun? ridiculously, you can

sign. why do i think it started? suspicious people are simply obliged to take care of the safety of their families, and rightly so. sergey anatolyevich, so sergey anatolyevich, nothing threatens you or your family. hasn't it started? how so gratitude i will explain to you, i'm sorry waiting for you time. seryozha remember the children

gorlikov listens. yes? hello, this is a bullet. you know, i just wanted to read to you what our people have written on your case, hear me. hello, while in europe, our army, with a red boot, crushes the fascist prelude. mouth, giving carrion. look, i'm sorry, you wrote it very well, but it needs to be slowed down. situation article was needed. well, what to do listen, this happens.

i understand. i hope you will treat this situation with understanding. really, it's all good, goodbye. that's all i know andrey sergeevich mikhail you heard something about wagner about composers no about the german agent in the thirty-fifth year, they intercepted the encryption, which said that the german agent wagner this is his pseudonym. heading to moscow is there information that wagner was recruited by law enforcement

agencies? where exactly good question? misha anywhere at least to us? change that according to information this wagner was guaranteed to fail. even before the war, our german scouts almost thwarted the defense of moscow rzhev 41, and so on and so forth. opinion or is it verified information? wagner has not approached him a single step for a long time. we don’t even know how old according to alla, what signs he has , the most interesting thing is that in the forty-second year. he generally disappeared, no activity, no activity, no appearances, as if he did not exist. six months ago, we discovered a sabotage trio, they were heading towards moscow their goal was. to contact wagner the preparation

was an unprecedented leak could not be, but wagner did not get in touch, either he felt something or knew something, we interrogated the saboteurs, but only found out no sense. that wagner is preparing a serious operation in moscow well , this means that he is, he exists, or this is a provocation. as it concerns you, misha petrov has been developing wagner all this time. maybe wagner and the infirmary are one and the same banner . but only petrov understood that wagner would not pass by the infirmary. do you think wagner chopped him from the

infirmary? i think misha that's why i asked, i'm so detailed about your friend sozonovo. we are all suspect. allow everything on monday in the sense that for some reason he immediately rudakov can be an artist. artist continued watch on monday at 21:20 vladimir

putin today took part in the annual meeting of the international discussion club. valdai this year, the main theme sounds like this: world after hegemony, justice and security for all, the russian president traditionally spoke at the plenary session. we have spoken more than once about the major shifts that have already taken place and are taking place in the world, about the risks associated with the degradation of world institutions, the erosion of the principles of collective security, and the substitution of international law for so-called rules. i wanted to say, it’s clear who invented it, but uh, perhaps it’s not exactly clear at all who invented it. uh, on how, uh, what are these based on regulations? uh, what's inside these pas- apparently there is only uh, an attempt to approve one rule, so that uh

the power that holds now in power they said, i'm talking about global power. uh, they had the opportunity to live without any rules at all, that's all. they were allowed. e would get away with it. whatever they do. here, in fact, these are the very rules that we constantly talk about. as the people say taldych, that is, they constantly talk about it. uh, the value of the valdai discussions lies in the fact that a variety of assessments and forecasts are heard here. oh, how true they were. e, life itself shows e and the most strict, e, and objective examiner of life. here it shows how correct our preliminary discussions were in previous years. alas, events are still developing according to a negative scenario, which we have spoken about more than once or twice, uh, of previous meetings, moreover, they have grown into large-scale

events, a systemic crisis, and not only in the military-political, but also in the economic and in the humanitarian field. uh, the so-called west well conditionally, of course there is no unity. everything is clear that this is a very complex conglomerate, but nevertheless. eh, let's say. so, this one, and the smell in recent years, and especially in recent months , has taken a number of steps to aggravate. well , as a matter of fact, uh, they always play on the escalation. there is nothing new here either. this is incitement to war in ukraine. this is a provocation around the concealment of destabilization of the global food and energy market. the latter, of course. it was not done on purpose. it's not here, there's no doubt system errors. these are just those western authorities, about which i have already mentioned. and as we see now, uh, plus the destruction of the

common european gas pipelines. these are generally transcendent things, but nevertheless we are witnessing these sad events. power over the world. uh, this is exactly what the so -called west has put at stake in their game, but the game. it's definitely dangerous. hmm bloody and i'd say dirty. it denies the sovereignty of countries and peoples, their originality and uniqueness do not put not in the interests of other states, in any case, if it is not directly spoken of denial, but in practice this is precisely what is carried out in life. eh, as if no one except those who formulate, and these very rules, oh, which i said have no right to original development. all others must be combed. here under these same rules. in this regard, let me remind you of the proposals of russia by its western partner to build confidence and build a system of collective security in december last year,

they were once again simply thrown aside, but in the modern world it is unlikely to sit out. the crisis that sowed the wind, as they say, will reap the storm, has really acquired a global character. it affects everyone. eh, there is no need to harbor any illusions in front of humanity now, in fact, there are two ways to either continue to accumulate a load of problems that will inevitably crush us all, or still try together. find a solution. though not ideal, but working capable of making our world more stable and safer. you know, i have always believed and believe in this power of common sense, because convinced sooner or later and the new center of the multipolar world order and the west. we will have to start an equal conversation about our common future, and the sooner the better. of course, in this regard, i will outline some extremely important ones. ah,

accents for all of us. today's events have overshadowed environmental problems. oddly enough, i would like to start with this issue of climate change has ceased to be at the top of the agenda, but these are fundamental challenges. they haven't disappeared anywhere. don't share anywhere. they only grow one of the most dangerous consequences of the violation of the ecological balance is the reduction of biodiversity in nature. and now i’m moving on to the main topic, for the sake of which we all gathered, but is it important to think that another diversity is cultural, social, political, civilizational together. with that, simplification, the erasure of all and any differences, have become almost the essence of the modern west. what is behind such simplification? first of all, this is the disappearance of the creative potential of the

west itself and the desire to restrain blocking the free there is a development of other civilizations, if there is a direct mercantile interest, of course, imposing their values, consumer stereotypes of unification and, uh, unification, our opponents will call them so neatly and they are trying to expand the markets for their products and everything is very primitive in the end on this track. they accidentally west claims exactly what? according to culture and worldview should be universal, but if it is not directly said, although it is also said directly to clean. e, often, that is, if directly they talk and behave exactly like that, uh, and hmm insist that, in fact, in fact, their politics insist that these very values ​​be unconditionally accepted by all

other participants in international communication 1978. he noted that the west is characterized by a continued quotation of a dazzling superiority. this is all happening so far, which further quotation supports the idea that all extensive areas on our planet should develop and evolve to the current western systems. seventy- eighth year yes, nothing has changed. over the past almost half a century, this blindness, about which solzhenitsyn spoke frankly russian and non-colonial in nature, has already acquired simply ugly forms, especially after the so -called polar world arose, which i want to say on this is confidence in my infallibility. this is a very dangerous condition. one step away from her. to the desire of the infallible themselves to simply destroy those

who they don't like. how do they say cancel? well , let's think about it, at least in the meaning of this word, even at the very height of the cold war at the peak of the confrontation between the systems of ideology and military rivalry, it never even occurred to anyone to deny the very existence of the culture of the art of science of other peoples of their opponents, it never even occurred to anyone. yes , certain restrictions were introduced on educational, scientific, cultural and, unfortunately, on sports communications, but nevertheless, both the soviet and american leaders of that time had enough understanding that the humanitarian sphere must be treated delicately studying and respecting the opponent sometimes hmm something and borrowing from him in order to maintain at least for the future the basis for healthy fruitful relations, and now it is still happening. at one time, the nazis reached the burning of books, and

now western parents have slipped into the prohibitions of dostoevsky and tchaikovsky, liberalism and progress, the so-called culture of abolition, but in fact we have already talked about this many times about the real abolition of culture. uh, mows down everything alive creative does not allow free thoughts to develop in any of the areas, either in the economy, or in politics , or in culture. the very liberal ideology. today has changed unrecognizable if originally classical liberalism. i understood the freedom of every person. how is the freedom to speak? whatever you want to do, whatever you want, then already in the twentieth century, and the liberals began to declare that the so-called open society. there are enemies, it turns out, of an open society, there are enemies, and the freedom of such enemies can and should be limited, or even cancelled. now they have reached the point of absurdity,

when any alternative point of view is declared subversive propaganda and a threat to democracy. that's what does not come from russia. this is all the machinations of the kremlin so look. really, we are so almighty that any criticism addressed to our opponents is perceived as the hand of the kremlin intrigues of the kremlin. well, this is some kind of nonsense. yes, what did they roll down? well, at least move your brains somehow more interestingly something to state your point of view. state it somehow, conceptually, it’s impossible to blame everything on e, on the intrigues of the kremlin, all this was prophetically predicted back in the 19th century by fyodor mikhailovich dastoevsky, one of the characters in his novel demons, the nihilist shegalev. e, so described, the bright future invented by him quote, leaving the boundless

freedom, i conclude with boundless bespokism. by the way, this is what our western opponents came to in his toilet, another character in the novel. peter verkhovensky, arguing, what is the need for widespread betrayal? evidence of espionage that society doesn't need in talents and higher abilities, cicero's tongue is cut off, and copernicus' eyes are gouged out. well, this is what ours comes to. western opponent that this is how not modern western culture. cancel. there were great thinkers, and uh, i’m grateful , to be honest, to my assistants who found these quotes, that you can, what can i say, history will melt, unconditionally put everything in its place and cancel, not the greatest, generally recognized e works recognized genius in the world

culture from those who today for some reason decided that it is in the right of this world culture to dispose of it at its own discretion. the self-conceit of such figures, what is called off scale? that's just their names in a few years, no one even remembers. and dostoevsky will live and tchaikovsky and pushkin no matter how anyone would like it, it was on the unification of financial and technological monopolism that the erasing of all and all differences was built and the western model of globalization is not about colonial in its essence. the task was clear to strengthen unconditional dominance of the west in the world economy and politics. and to do this, put at the service of natural and financial resources , intellectual personnel and economic opportunities of the entire planet to do this under the sauce of the so-called new global interdependence.

here i would like to recall another russian philosopher alexander aleksandrovich zinoviev, whose centenary is on hmm centenary from the date of his birth, whom we will celebrate just the other day on october 29, even more than 20 years ago. he said that necessary for the survival of western civilization at the level reached by it. there is also a quote, the whole planet is necessary, as an environment for existence, all the resources of mankind are necessary, and they do not claim this one, it is. everything is just like that. and in this system. the west initially pledged itself to a huge truck, as it itself developed its principles and mechanisms. how are these very principles now, which are constantly repeated and hmm, which are an incomprehensible black hole, what is it? no one knows, but once the benefits of globalization have become to extract, not western countries, but other

states, and above all, we are talking, of course, about the large states of asia. the west immediately changed or completely abolished many rules and illuminated so -called sacred principles, to work out economic openness of trade, equal competition, even property rights. all of a sudden, they completely forgot about it. how did something become profitable for oneself so immediately on the go, in the course of the game they change the rules or another example of the substitution of concepts and meanings western ideologists and politicians have been saying and repeating for many years the whole world of democracy, there is no alternative. true speech. they were talking about the western liberal so -called model of democracy. everything else is all other options and forms of democracy. they scornfully and i want to emphasize this through the lip, arrogantly rejected. this manner has been established for a

long time since colonial times, everyone is considered second-class people, and they continue to be exceptional for centuries to this day. but today, the reciprocal majority of the world community, just demands democracy in international affairs accepts any form of authoritarian dictate of individual countries or groups of states, which is not a direct application of the principles of democracy at the level of international relations, and what is the position of the civilized west in quotation marks ? , the west calls it undermining the liberal order is based on the rules of gravity starts the code economic trade wars sanctions boycotts, color revolutions are preparing and carrying out various kinds of revolutions. here is one of them led to tragic consequences in ukraine in 2014.

they even supported them. they said how much money this coup was selectively, in general, the hameles simply did not hesitate to take anything. soleimani killed uh iranian. uh, the general can be treated as you like, who are they, well, whatever, but this official of another state was killed on the territory of a third party and say. yes, we killed what it is in general we where we live. and washington, out of habit, continues to call the current measures order in american liberals, but in fact, every day this notorious order multiplies chaos and i will add. it becomes more and more intolerant even in relation to the western countries themselves to their attempts to show any independence. everything is suppressed in the bud directly and impose more sanctions against their own allies, without any hesitation. okay, we totally agree, we lower our heads. well

, for example, the july proposals of the hungarian parliamentarians to fix the commitment to european christian values ​​in the eu treaty and culture were perceived not even as fron. yes, but as a direct hostile sabotage. what is this? well , how to understand it? well, some people might like it, some might not. for 1,000 years, we in russia have developed a unique culture of interaction between all world religions. there is no need to cancel anything, not christian values, nor islamic, not jewish values, other world religions. at us are present it is necessary simply with respect to treat each other. and we have in a number of regions of the country. i just know it's not hearsay. people go together to celebrate both christian holidays and islamic and buddhist ones. jewish and made with pleasure. i congratulate each other and rejoice for each other. but not here.

why not? well, at least we discussed it. surprisingly, all this, without exaggeration, is not even systemic from the doctrinal crisis of the neoliberal model of the american world order; they have no ideas of creating positive development. they simply have nothing to offer the world, except for maintaining their dominance, i am convinced that real democracy is in a multipolar world. first of all, it assumes opportunity for any nation. i want to emphasize this for any society of any civilization to choose its own path, its own socio-political system, if the united states has such a right, the eu countries, then the countries of asia certainly have it, the islamic states of the monarchy of the persian gulf, the states of other continents, if, of course, and our country in russia and no one will ever be able to dictate to our people. what kind of society and on what principles

should we build a direct threat to the political economic ideological monopoly, the west in that in the world may arise. productive public models are more effective, i would like to emphasize that more effective in today's day brighter more attractive than something that exists, but such models will definitely develop. it is inevitable that everyone should, by the way, american political scientists specialists. they write about it directly, though their power. the powers that be don't listen much. although they cannot but see these ideas that are expressed on the pages of, uh, political science magazines and in discussions. it is necessary to develop the development should take place precisely in the dialogue of civilization based on spiritual and moral values, and different

civilizations have a different understanding of man of his nature. it is only honest on the surface, only different, but everyone recognizes the highest dignity and spiritual essence of a person, and this is extremely important . it is not some fixed set of postulates which everyone should adhere to. of course not, their difference from the so-called neo-liberal values ​​is that in each case they are not repeatable, because they follow from the tradition of a particular society, its culture and historical experience. therefore, traditional values ​​cannot be imposed on anyone; they must simply be respected with care

for what each nation has chosen, uh, for centuries. chosen for centuries. every nation. this is our understanding of traditional values, and this approach is shared and accepted by the majority of humanity. this is natural, because it is the traditional societies of the east of latin america, africa, eurasia that form the basis of world civilization, respect for the peculiarities of peoples and civilization in the interests of everyone, in fact, this interests and the so -called west, losing superiority. he is quickly becoming a minority on world time. and of course, the right of this western minority to its own cultural identity, i certainly want to emphasize this, must be ensured relatively necessary for this, absolutely. with respect, but i emphasize on an equal footing with the rights of all the rest, if the western elites believe they can instill

strange things into the minds of their people in their societies. in my opinion, newfangled trends, like dozens of genders and gay parades. so be it. yes, let them do what they want, but, uh, what they definitely have no right to. so it is to require others to follow in the same direction. we see that complex demographic political social processes are unquestionably going on in western countries. this is their internal business. russia does not interfere in these issues and is not going to to do, unlike the west we do not interfere in someone else's backyard , but we hope that pragmatism will prevail and russia's dialogue with the true traditional west, as well as with other equal centers of development, will become an important contribution to the construction of a multipolar world order. i will add that multipolarity is a real, and in fact the only chance for the same

europe to restore its political and economic subjectivity. well, what's wrong with hiding? we understand everything and also speak directly to europe about this. today it is the subjectivity of europe as a right to put it mildly, in order not to offend anyone, the world is severely limited by its nature. multiple attempts. the west to drive everyone under one template objectively, and the reasons nothing will come of it. an arrogant desire for world leadership, and, in fact, to dictate or maintain leadership through dictates. in fact, it turns into a decrease in the international prestige or the leader of the western world, including the united states. and the growth of distrust in treaties, the ability in general , today they say one thing, tomorrow another documents sign tomorrow from them refuse. well, they do what they want, well, some kind of stability there is

nothing at all, how do documents sign what to talk about? what can you wear completely incomprehensible? if earlier only a few countries allowed themselves to argue with the same america. it looked almost like a sensation, but now it is already commonplace when various states refuse washington his unfounded demands, despite the fact that he is still trying to put pressure on everyone. erroneous policy is absolutely nowhere, just well, let it be theirs too i am convinced that the peoples of the world will not turn a blind eye to the policy of coercion, which has discredited itself and every time i forget for trying to maintain my hegemony, i will have to pay and pay more and more prices in the place of these

persons. the west would seriously think about such a prospect in the same way that they think about it, as i have already said some political scientists, and politicians in the united states itself in the current conditions of severe conflict, i will say some things directly. russia being independent and distinctive civilization. i have never considered and do not consider myself an enemy of the west. americano phobia anglophobia francophobia germanophobia are the same forms of racism as russophobia and anti-semitism, however, like any manifestations of xenophobia. you just need to clearly understand what is, as i already said before these two. there are at least two west, and we are more for you, but at least two west of traditional, primarily christian values ​​freedom of patriotism the richest culture, but now islamic values, too, a significant part of the population of many western countries do not profess islam but this west is close to us in some ways, in many respects we have

common even more ancient roots, but if the other west is aggressive, cosmopolitan , neo-colonial, acting, as an instrument of liberal lines, this is exactly the west russia, of course. never reconcile. in 2000, after being elected president, i always faced something and i will always remember this. remember what price we paid for destroying the terrorist nest in the north caucasus, which the west then practically openly supported here. of you present in this hall, they understand what i 'm talking about. we know that this is exactly what happened in practice. financial political information support, well, we all survived it,

moreover, not only actively supported the terrorists on the territory of russia, but also in many ways nurtured this threat. we know this. nevertheless, after the stabilization of the situation, when the main gangs of terrorists were defeated, thanks, among other things, to the courage of the chechen people, we made the decision not to turn around. build yourself offended to go. forward. build relationships. even with those who actually worked against us to establish and develop relations with everyone who wants it on the basis of mutual benefit and respect for each other, it was thought that these were common interests. russia, thank god, survived all the difficulties of that time, withstood, strengthened itself with internal terrorism, coped with the economy , preserved, began to develop defense capability. started to rise. we tried to build relationships

both with the leading parties of the west and with nato. the message was one. let's stop being enemies. let's live together. let's have a dialogue to build trust, and hence the world. we were absolutely sincere. i want to emphasize this. they clearly understood the complexity of such a rapprochement, but went for it. and what did we get? did you get a short answer? there is no possible cooperation in almost all main areas. we received a constant growing pressure on us and the creation of hotbeds of tension at our borders, congratulations aimed to ask what kind of pressure is this? well, how to train so simply that whether? well, of course not. the goal is to make russia more vulnerable, the goal is to turn russia into a tool to

achieve their own geopolitical goals. strictly speaking, everyone is trying to turn this universal rule into a tool in order to use these tools for their own purposes. and those who do not submit to this pressure do not want to be such a tool against them, sanctions are imposed against them or all sorts of, uh, economic restrictions are imposed on the relationship. uh, so a coup is being prepared or where possible hold are held and so on and so forth. we'll end up, if at all unable to do anything, absolutely annihilate. it has not been possible to brush off the political map and will never be able to deploy and implement such a scenario in relation to russia. what else i would like to

add russia does not challenge or the west russia simply defends its right to exist, free development, while we ourselves are not going to stop as some kind of new hegemon. russia does not propose to replace unipolarity with bipolarity with tripolarity and so on dominance. west dominance east north or south. this is inevitable, would lead to a new impasse. i want to quote here the words of the great russian philosopher nikolai yakovlevich danilevsky, who believed that progress does not consist in going in the same direction for everyone, as we are being pushed by the cute girl who is our opponents. in this case, progress soon you stopped speaking for nevsky, but to proceed from the whole field, constituting the historical activity of mankind in all directions, and he adds, that no civilization. it cannot be proud

that it represents the highest point of development. i am convinced that dictatorship can be countered only by the freedom of development of the country of peoples. degradation of the personality love for a person as a creator of primitive forgiveness by a ban on the flourishing complexity of cultures and traditions, the meaning of today's historical moment lies precisely in the fact that all civilizations, states and their integration associations really open up opportunities for their own democratic original path of development and first of all, we believe that the new world order should be based on the law and correctly be free, original and fair, so the world economy and trade should become more fair and open. russia considers the process of formation of new international financial platforms inevitable. including for the purpose

of international settlements, such platforms should be located outside national jurisdictions, be safe for politicized, but automated and not dependent on either a single control center, is it possible to do this or not? of course yes. it will take a lot of effort to unite the efforts of many countries, and to do this, it will eliminate the possibility of abuse. in the area of ​​the new global financial infrastructure, it will make it possible to efficiently and safely deal with international transactions without the dollar and others. the so-called reserve currencies, especially since using the dollar as a weapon, the united states yes and the west as a whole has discredited the institute of international financial reserves. first, they were devalued due to inflation in the dollar and euro zones, and then all of his tsap-scratch baited our

gold and foreign exchange reserves. the transition to settlements in national currencies will inevitably gain momentum. this, of course, depends on the level of wealth of the issuers of these currencies. the state of their economies. well, they will be strengthened and such calculations will certainly be, uh, such logic of the timely sovereign economic financial policy of the multipolar world will gradually begin to dominate. today, the new centers of world development already have unique technologies and scientific developments in various fields. and in many areas they can successfully compete with western multinational companies, it is obvious that we, uh, have a common, quite pragmatic interest in an honest and open scientific and technological exchange; together, everyone will benefit more than they should benefit individually . the majority, not individual super-rich

corporations, and as is the case today, if the west sells medicines or food seeds to other countries, then they are ordered to kill national pharmaceutics vasileccija. well, in fact, because in practice it all boils down to this, supplies of machine tools and equipment destroy local engineering. you know, it's worth it, but here i am, uh, being representatives of the government. i realized this is only hmm open the market. for certain for a certain product group, all local producers lay down and it is almost impossible to raise their heads in such a way that they build a relationship in this way , markets are captured and the resources of the country are deprived of their technological scientific potential. this is not progress, but enslavement reducing economies to a primitive level, technological development should not increase

global inequality, but reduce it, this is how russia traditionally implements its foreign e-technological policy well, for example, uh, by building nuclear power plants in other states. we create at the same time. there centers of competence train national personnel. we are creating industries, we are not just building an enterprise, but we are creating an entire industry. in essence, we give other countries the opportunity to make a real breakthrough in their scientific and technological development to reduce inequality to bring our energy industry to a new level of efficiency and environmental friendliness, i will again emphasize sovereignty, original development in no way means isolation, e, authors, but, on the contrary, it implies active interaction and mutually beneficial cooperation of our fair and equal principles,

if liberal globalization, if liberal globalization - this is depersonalization, the imposition of the western model on the whole world, then integration, on the contrary, is the disclosure of the potential of each civilization in the interests of the whole for the sake of the common gain. if globalism is a dictate it all comes down to this in the end, then integration is the joint development of common strategies that are beneficial to everyone. in this regard, russia considers it important to more actively launch mechanisms for creating large spaces built on cooperation with neighboring countries. whose economy, social system, resource base, infrastructure , such large spaces complement each other, in fact, is the basis of a multipolar world order. the economic basis of their dialogue and the true unity of mankind is born much more complex, original and multidimensional, than in the simplified ideas of western

ideologists. well, some western regions. the only humanity is not built on command. do as i do, be as i do, it is formed taking into account and on the basis of the opinions of all, with a careful attitude to the identity of each society and people, it is on this principle that long-term interaction can develop in a multipolar world. in this regard. it may also be worth considering that the structure of the united nations, including its security councils, more reflect it is the diversity of world regions, because much more will depend on asia africa latin america in the world of tomorrow than is commonly believed today, and such an increase in their influence is undoubtedly positive. let me remind you that western civilization is not the only one, even in our common eurasian space; moreover, the majority of the population is concentrated precisely in the east of eurasia

, where the centers of the most ancient civilizations of mankind arose, the value and significance of eurasia is that this continent is a self-sufficient complex with gigantic resources of any kind and enormous opportunities, and the more we work to increase the connectivity of eurasia by creating new ways of forms of cooperation, the more impressive the success. we will strive. successful operation of the eurasian economic union rapid growth of the authority and influence of the shanghai cooperation organization large-scale initiative within the framework of one belt one road multilateral cooperation plans for the implementation of transport corridors of the north, south, and others many others projects in this part of the world. sure. this is the beginning of a new era of a new stage in the development of eurasia integration projects. here they do not contradict, but

mutually complement each other. of course, if they are carried out by strange neighbors in their own interests, and are not introduced by external forces in order to split the eurasian space and turn it into a zone of bloc confrontation , europe could also be a natural part of greater eurasia. but many of its leaders are hindered by the conviction that europeans are better than others. what do they it is not appropriate to participate in some undertakings on an equal footing with the rest for such arrogance, they somehow do not notice that they themselves have already become, in a foreign periphery, turned, in fact, into vassals. often and without the right to vote dear colleagues, the collapse of the soviet union also destroyed the balance of geopolitical forces. the west felt like a winner and proclaimed a unipolar device, in which only its will, its

culture, its interests had the right to exist. now this historical period of undivided domination. west in the world affairs. completes going back in time to polar world. we are at a historical frontier. ahead is probably the most dangerous unpredictable and at the same time important decade since the times. e the end of world war ii. the west is not able to single-handedly manage humanity, but it is desperately trying to do it, and most of the peoples of the world no longer want to measure it. this is the main contradiction of the new era, in the words of a classic , the situation to a certain extent, the revolutionary elite cannot, and does not want to live like this, if speak the words of a classic. this state of affairs is fraught with global conflicts or a whole chain

of conflict. e, what is a threat to humanity, including the west itself, to constructively and creatively resolve such a contradiction? here is today's main historical task - the change of age is a painful, but natural and inevitable future world order is being formed before our eyes. and in this world order. we must listen to everyone and take into account every point of view. every nation society culture every system worldviews of ideas and religious ideas, without imposing a single truth on anyone, and only on this basis, understanding their responsibility for the fate of the fate of the peoples of the planet, build a symphony of human civilization. this is where i would like to end with words of gratitude for the patience that you showed while listening to my message. thank you so much. now advertising, and then we will discuss in

the studio. juicy whole chicken cheeseburger from 89 rubles. that's the beauty of dry shampoo for fresh looks lest you think it's a beauty. stressful situation i recommend magnesium hillatovalar magnesium hilla tavalar - this is better absorption and convenient intake of only two tablets a day instead of the usual six, magnesium hylate and valar are better than magnesium in stressful situations completely naked, where the mountains sway in salted caramel and a pinch of korean, please, always great deals

on hello world.ru for gasoline. i will pay the world the usual cashless prices of 150,000 options. cashback 30%. i'll rent an apartment for a day.ru with pasta and mashed cutlets. only cherkizovo from the meat of our own farms, cherkizova, the new national lottery you have a high chance of winning or a lot of serious prizes. still, if you want to win a million, then buy a ticket from partners and nloto.ru national lottery. do you plead guilty? y. you think you'll break the glass, you'll cut your veins , they won't let you die, only they'll add a term. if suddenly anna appears, even less i immediately tell you.

i still have to leave. you understand that they are looking for me. you will go as an accomplice, unbroken on saturday and sunday at 12:00 the feeling is overwhelmed by such powerful associations of energy, such an impression is very large , these shots from above, someone is interweaving like that. i really liked the action of some miracle very colorful very bright very believable powerful crazy twofold woman who, on the one

hand, is a sorceress, on the other hand, real women. here is a very interesting image. and it's not entirely clear. how this movie ends is worth watching twice . heart of parma 60 minutes with us specially issue, we start with breaking news 60 minutes. don't miss tomorrow at 11:30 and 17:30 on the channel, russia ivanovich so what will the world be like after hegemony? how to ensure that russia remains with itself, how to ensure that diversity wins in the world, so that the hegemony of the west, which led the world to an absolute crisis

, ends, because well, it’s real, as putin said, a revolutionary situation when countries can no longer live as before . the crisis is acute in transnistria, the russian president said that we will now block the pipelines for them and then everything will be there will be good. i responded to what? this is not a stub, the usual one that i took blocked. this some people want it to be so, while others want it to be so which of them is stronger, and the fate of the stub will be determined. yes, it might open. or maybe they will close. i kind of opened it there. that's not the point. but i just want to say that, as it were, the fate of the world is determined as a struggle of forces, and, so to speak, the degree of uncompromisingness of these forces of interest and everything else determines the fate of the world, and not that we want it to be good.

one song steps. count he wants to be happy. he doesn't want the other way around, i understand that, i just don't understand the question of how exactly the legs of germany of the west will be destroyed while saving. will the west want to exist in the absence of its hegemony? yes, and if he does not want to exist like this, then will he not stop the existence of the world in the form in which it exists, in general, right? and will not everything that happens then be, so to speak, a post-catastrophic assembly. yes, because all of humanity will not immediately cease to exist. this means that after some kind of extreme forms of revealing by this west, the unwillingness to give up its hegemony, some kind of assembly will take place again, but this assembly will already take place, but the market for what we call universal human civilization is ready or not the west to destroy this universal civilization for the sake of maintaining its hegemony or not ready. it seems to me that he

is ready for a lot in this sense, but, as it were, what is happening with all this hegemony and with everything else, well, firstly, from the moment when roosevelt defeated churchill, to put it mildly, almost by force to recognize independence. it became completely clear to india that some hefty masses are recognized there, as if there are billions of people, yes, who are allowed to live according to the rules of their conditional independence. let’s leave aside some kind of independence of small-holism , but they began to develop. and they could not but develop, could not but develop. china cannot but develop, india and everything else, developing. they adopted exactly what would be equal to arming the west after all, what is the last congress of the chinese communist party there now, other

things, what are we talking about, but that giant disappointment, well, the chinese elite caused a simple thing here we play by the rules. yes, we make more friends. that's it, well, give us the place that we are entitled to according to the results of this game, but if we won, yes, well, give us this place and india give this place and so on , the question arises, but someone is going to give this place, there in other words, if china india finally win let's imagine ourselves like this in a few decades. yes every chinese has every indian. eh, will exist there. there is a cottage with two cars, there is electricity, uh, fuel for this, and so on and so forth, that is, someone imagines himself such a world where these billions of people will become, so to speak, approximately the same consumers as they were, so to speak, in peak development of american civilization. american citizen call give it to them or not give it it was clear that it was no one to them

will give. this will be called at the same time on the mother club. and for anything that is not possible, there are not enough sweet gingerbreads for everyone, but in fact it will be clear that they simply will not be given leadership. and then the question arises. how to fold this leadership, if all the countries of this type are not only china, india is there, korea is there, vietnam is there and so on. they all admitted that they will develop, catch up and catch up with these countries, the united states and so on, using the models of the united states and the fact that the united states states and the west as a whole called the real development. after all, when kipling wrote there, bear the time of the white. yes, you will be able to endure everything and so on. he is nonetheless. i said, give them everything that belongs to you, so to speak. he didn't say, so to speak, trample them and trample them as much as you like. i won't talk about what to say, as would be guided by britannia maximus and kepling.

it was just spoken. this was called westernization, catching up with development, catching up with modernization, and so on. this was based on western principles that arose after the french revolution are the essence, which has always been defined by this concept of modern yes, the nation as a subject of modernization and which again arose as a result of interfaith clashes there, but it was no longer possible to say that, so to speak, france is a frenchman - this is a catholic, because the huguenots began to arise all these questions related to what is a frenchman how to create a new community. how to make it non -controversial and so on great french the bourgeois revolution and everything that followed more or less determined this in practice. this is to say the breaking of estates. uh, here, this bourgeois development in the cold water of selfish calculation was said in the communist manifesto. all values ​​will not be drowned, and here are those that the patriarch says in his

speech, yes, the cathedral, and so on and so forth, and he redefined this modern with its huge number of components. what is a nation? yes? let's say it there. language, culture and, as the french say, reverence for france is there, there, all sorts of sacred stones and so on , a fairly convincing construction was built, a fairly convincing secular humanism, and everything else. they just started to crumble after about 50 years. after the vacuum cleaner, in fact, we have experienced three eras. we have gone through a very long era of god orientation and god well, more often than not, humanity continues to focus on this. yes, we survived. this, together with these kondras and everything else, we have experienced a very short era of relying on reason. this, by the way, ended him kant at all no one will demonstrate all these things that are called dichotomy and unprovable things, and then

goder turned out that the mind is not omnipotent. he was the leader of this rejection of history. and this is a very far-reaching problem. what does this refusal mean, we suddenly saw somewhere, well, after the collapse of the soviet union, first these idiotic articles about the end of history and so on, and then we saw something much more far going and quite practical speaks at the caribbean university-natalization rice at that moment, so to speak, the secretary of state pribushe, e, as it were, says all our past allies. now our enemies. and all who were against it, so to speak, in general, everything turns upside down, as if inside out, we turn the world inside out. why because our enemy was already

said then, that is, about 30 years ago, about, well, 25. yes, it was said more than twenty years ago that, in fact, uh, how would we cancel catching up with modernization and all these institutions, who provide it. we call our friends like mubarah and others enemies. why, but, because it’s some kind of new semi-authoritarian modernization enemy in the world, who authoritarianism has been going for this for a long time, we just, well, someone didn’t notice that, in my opinion, someone still does not notice this, they went consistently to this change of milestones, but is there a catch-up modernization, authoritarian not authoritarian. this is the main enemy of what should be so in the world now. so, yes, it was clear that if india, china and others countries will modernize so they will overtake the

united states they will become the new leaders sooner or later in one scenario or another. if the rules of the game of this modernity are observed, then there will be a historical uneven development of new countries, they will replace the old ones, and so on. what is now being proposed? yes, in fact, when you described hilferent, when it was in this periodism, as the highest stage, now it is called ultramon, imperialism, and so on, that is, questions are included in whether old and new countries will change in accordance with historical patterns or the old countries will somehow forbid the new countries to occupy, as it was said, germany during the first world war, a place in the sun. let there be this place or not, these countries that are in the lead, they will encourage development. other countries and recognize the results west answered no answer. he became completely

different. he has completely changed. and the radical nature of this change is colossal. he began to destroy all of these. yes, it used to be called ours some son of a bitch. yes, according to the dictator , some authoritarian leader, somewhere he develops something, but already in iran that this actually happened. the shah did not like something so much, what he said that he would modernize. iran will develop, there, the metallurgical industry, then another fifth, which was put forward. by the west itself, as an alternative. but what we have now is what you have with the iranians. well, a nation that is very ancient cultural, it again creates development. it needs to be stopped again. so the main task now is to prevent development. moreover, in the most active way, when clinton said this vile phrase that we were bombing serbia in the

middle ages, it was clear that not only serbia and not only in the middle ages would be bombed, a new archaism is on the agenda. the periphery of the world must be archaic. it should be forbidden to develop a foreve, forever its development, any embryos should be destroyed. by the way, in europe , too, europe of kazakhstan, but would like to become a referee of eurasia , but for now it is a pereterei the core is formed, as a rewarding task of which is to force everything else not to develop. it 's starting to develop, a humanitarian operation. and whatever. this new world presupposes, as it were, another person. and this person becomes the post man, the patriarch recalled, there is transhumanism. this is only part of the general theme. yes, this person

becomes. here is this post human post humanism, the west who said that he affirms secular humanism cancels, in fact. this development further begins all these perversions and so on, as already a consequence, and we see how a new atlantis arises. yes, well, this is a new atlantis that forbids the development of everything else; it became the subject of consideration by russia in this new atlantis of the place. no, it means that either she or russia and, accordingly, the question arises of how to build russia so that she can at least restrain the movement of this atlantis. it is completely clear that this is a task of a huge scale of no relation. the previous task of entering this atlantis does not have this revolutionary radical turn, which, of course, must be declared, but, among

other things, it must be carried out in practice, andrei, rightly, after we left such a firm soil of marxism-leninism, when we knew where to go, what to build? well, in principle, many of us here just went through these basics, therefore, based on them, we ended up in such a shaky swamp of all sorts of western theories , by the way, for young people - they are now this soil, because, well, didn’t come up with anything special, purely russian vladimir ilyichev of our ancestral karl marx cordon fries. the fact is that, proceeding from here, having fished in this swamp , you can catch the theory of hygienic stability, which is based on which, in general? more than one generation of western politicians has grown up, and they only have theorists, not only scientists who believe that this cannot be in the world , there must always be a hegemon, a power that

accumulates an advantage, both in the economic and political military sphere and for a certain period of time long cycles. there leadership 100-120 years leaves establishes its dominance. she may then lose this dominance, like great britain, but keep it already in shape, other than hegemony, leadership, when analyzed by example. yes, the industrial revolution is still, for example, in the uk, which was then repeated by all other countries. not only not only european for the current period. again, based on this theory, the united states is not fighting for what it is fighting for. just for the preservation of the second period of the second long cycle of its predominance its leadership. only already. now, maybe not by hegemony, by example. in my opinion, the united states premier is just over 30 years of its sole moment. that is , they could not work out a unipolar world, but putin

is talking about this, that is, you never know, they have degenerated into the complete opposite of their princes, who initially declare practically no new principles. we say that we do not want a polar or bipolar world. we believe that everyone has the opportunity develop, and it must develop, that we more than one model of democracy will be provided. of course have. they want more absolutely right. yes, all for your words. we must understand that we will fight and fight, of course, but suddenly the time of a russian person will appear. for the rest of the world, i mean that in terms of what a multipolar world is about which is the end of the time of the russian people. i'm kidding. no, i understand that you are joking, but just even a combination of contradictions. yes, that's the feeling, that somehow sounds bad. yes, the burden of a russian person is on to pull the regional scale at least on the scale of the russian empire, on the contrary, somehow it always turned out not to be a burden, which, so to speak, but a service of taking away. i am a mission. well, it's just that there is a

word not very russian. yes, most likely, we will not accept this, therefore, therefore, it will not work here. our main main task, in principle, is in this multipolar world, which will be integrated as long as the three poles are planned for the united states . the concept of two partnerships that two were building there. the administration was filled up by one trump, then in the center of the world, it turns out, just the united states, which, through the atlantic, the pacific ocean, as it were, involves about the finiteness of eurasia. here in this common space of its own, and thereby, as it were, squeezes the eurasian states. first of all, we and china are in this vice. therefore, three main centers are still visible. and, judging by the latter. again, to the convention, india cannot be the center for

one simple reason and there is nothing to make it from. there one india and that's it. here india has a problem of loneliness, but in quotation marks. naturally, as we talk about in india, what is the problem of the population of germany's property, what exactly did it hold when it was, to participate in the asia-pacific layouts, well, the session plus six, and why do you need to participate somewhere all the time? that's exactly right. yes, because one's capacity is current in today's world. based on the multipolarity of one country, it is clearly not enough, they already understand this. everything, but one side is not enough, but why is it you need to collect something, you need to collect something around you, being an attractive center, to concentrate around yourself the potential of other states, then you will be valuable. well, to be valuable, why do you have to be the center of something,

if you yourself are so great? why so big? well, because a giant country. you know, this is first, not a giant party. if you look at the scale of the territory, it’s not at all gigantic, but, well, she will need it if she is not small, she needs not small, but her well the population, how many times greater than the territory that it occupies, you understand, of course, there is only that the population far exceeds its territory. you are scaring me. and why the population of the territory, because you mean, to have a place in the world, that is, in order to simply criteria, because to maintain a square meter in order to support themselves as hindus this large market had to be. well, look. yes, you will need interaction with others. same price tags. well, what does putin say, why? is this the center? well, maybe, uh, the charm of diversity in india, its idea of ​​a civilizational

model is correct, the advice of ideas about its form of people's democracy is an absolutely original culture. it turned out that what zino was talking about, and that of the modern west well, what he said, putin repeated there, he quoted the earthly, it is necessary, therefore, the whole world to leave, and the whole world does not want to be mastered. you just don't want to do this. why india has to fit into models that are absolutely wipeable can not, yes, well, the center of the state center never fits it builds its own. well you offer yours well look you offer western approach to policy analysis believe that the players must comply with it. well, you suggest, here is the whole system, which is wonderful, but from a previous era. why is it possible to return to the previous era from the previous era? let's build build communism. yes, no, you can't go anywhere. let's build communism. it is universal and it is necessary to go from

the fact that we have these states to exist, whom he gathered. which center created the question. well, this process claims. sorry to the pole of power. no, well, after all, so and is the pole is the point of view is like mecca for example, the same. yes, and mecca is as it is, so now we will begin to define. and that they use forces and get confused. why is the construction of these states here. we can determine this correctly, if we are within the framework of a certain polytechnological doctrine. and if you tell india that you are not a pole of power, he says, why do they use it? well? because she cannot feed the population on her own terms, for example, no one can feed the pension states of russia on her own terms can feed her population on her own terms, but they can buy what they want to feed, yes, and on their 5 years will be on its

close leadership has the political will to build its center. attach, they build themselves simultaneously from the center. yes why does he need to be the center in order to strengthen himself? why well, because this is the formula of any smartphone. you and i live in the roman empire, which was the center of which it was the roman empire around, that it was the center of its own, was not the center. he was rome. it will be essential that this is what it is about, or you have your essence, if you define yourself, rome would not have built an empire because rome did not produce anything in essence, but well, what crows? sorry, sorry man. well, well, well, in general, come on, managed to paste, as they said, but we managed to build roads

organize legions. so it means that he produced everything himself, everything that was needed. stop, but here the very approach is that we constantly read that there should be two leaders three leaders. why do we believe that the world should be multipolar denies it? no, why am i just this is what we are talking about, because if you take a center, then you will even have a separate center, there will still be one center of these centers, and then there will be a center. no why, because as i said now now no, rusty, which can already be called three centers, stable. maybe, that a dozen more will appear, which will also build their own centers and each will develop and perhaps even specialize. it will be possible to collide with another center. and perhaps, experts, of course, but civilization is just the old model. oh, it's just how it really works. why? well, the oldest one, what would you like russia to specialize in

, no, because someday i would like it to be based on ideas, and that's right . except, so to speak, and the west - this is western thought, western ideas. now it becomes material. this is the only strength was the recent past. here in after the end of the cold war, which tried to hold some idea there, the ideas of a democrat, whether we like it or not. we fit into this idea, china into this idea. in general, fit in by and large. and now china has suggested that he has his own idea or indescribable proposed what nehru is not? who proposed what idea? he offered her said that in humanity one fate. oh well, you tell me socialism with chinese. listen how many chinese why should they even offer the rest an idea, they deal with themselves, in general this is a phrase of the country. we are now with something why , in this case, does a chinese woman take care of herself? why, in

this case, did he want to be a regional power , or is it even more so in your western language? china wants to be jungkook's china with a unified state. well , that is, of course, the celestials, of course, the center of the celestial empire, that is, the center. why immediately the church understand the kingdom, so is the middle correctly not the center of the middle heavens they think about themselves they are about how to gather around themselves somehow they gather about it around themselves. you must take care of them. they do it right, and sometimes they say we won't care. we just use it like one belt. one way or not in africa they care a lot. of course not. therefore, we are fighting an anatomical partnership in rap. why did they offer? why did they sign it choice they

sign sign aspire. they have free trade zones absolutely it is beneficial for them, they impose their photos because they establish. here they feel themselves as the center and line up around themselves. just the periphery can be built well. may appear in the center. who is wanted, of course, to be americans. here, and here is what the chinese are saying now. that's the white man's mindset. ah well, and like this, or not, this is absolutely not an asian performance. of course, you can build communism, again binary yes, either one way or communism. and why and what kind of variety will this set of centers be? why? now it's already three, well, there's more, if brazil who saw four gone, but the most and what, you still think of the category of hegemonism by them? there are problems in this, this is the problem that ruined, the west

i apologize for the battle in categories and the mechanism, of course , said what else, but in theory there was no such hegemony, for example, rust, which was in the lead, but was in the lead by examples repealed the law all ran out of repeating free trade, yes, she set her own example with gunboats. well, why are we talking about an example in a fairy tale. well, of course, after all, for example, russia came and tried the crimean war. of course, the sockeye salmon was not about the crimean war, but the essence for the germans for us, it was also an example. we, as we wanted , also industrial revolutions, we say that all this system does not work, then what putin is talking about . no, he says

that there should be no hegemony at all, as such. well, what's the difference changing, west on someone this does not change the scheme of another, but we are talking about the richness of diversity. that is, it is an attempt to hear. we don’t say, but you only have gender turned around. well, go, i think, do not interfere with us, you want to be us, here you are. we have a different, of course, maybe any interpretation. yes, but it looks a little like, the desire of globalizers in the nineties to say that we will erase the framework of nation-states of national interests will no longer exist. let's build something like a world of integrity, of course, here namely, because we deny the dispute as long as the states are interesting. and these interests will clash one way or another, again no, because under the name of the state, he speaks the thought of the previous category europe the state europe is not the state. and what about now europe is separate states now europe now europe has

gone along the path of destruction the lord is everything now europe is imposed on the model of the west with which we are fighting, when there is a single format of democracy, a single form, the abolition of culture, kensel, quality kalcha, well, yes, yes this is denial goes. everything is ionic. it is a privilege to have a state. it is a great honor, and in general, even i spoke about it for this. here's to the states. and if there is and if there are interests, these interests. in the modern world, it requires the consolidation of its own state. well , why the state is a plus, but america has grown larger, everything around has ceased to be state-owned by the american will. imposed by all the satellite in us is globalization, not the state. here is a completely different model, we say no. no, a single standard of democracy. no, one

culture standard. you, putin says, you have already degenerated what you once fought. who is arguing with this you? i didn't argue with that, but you know, it's interesting. uh, about marxism, they probably left it, yes, but the question of resources will still have to be returned. that's because a thousand flowers or one flower will bloom there. here's the question anyway. uh, resource, of course, or endless, because western civilization. this is what we know. it has grown since the age of discovery and all capitalism has grown find and infinity of resources. he is endless. by the way, pay attention yes, the era of geographical discoveries, what was in europe, they themselves called the dark ages they had. by the way, no one is

discussing. where did the renaissance come from. what it is? yes, just food appeared in large quantities after the robbery of the colonial world. do you understand? and in principle, you could start painting at that moment, and uh. you know, how curious it is, uh , as long as they thought that it was necessary to plunder into byzantium and there the future. here were the crusades hiking. well, then it turned out that you can rob other places, and in general, the problem was happily solved. she was quite a long time. and it was not in vain that he spoke about the history of sergei ivanovich. this is a very serious hoax, not a single nation, not a single civilization is free from its history from how it arose, stopped, was brought up, was

comprehended by itself, if in russian there is a series of values, and yet such other things, this civilization cannot exist. she does not think of herself outside of robbery, as a source of resource existence. no, maybe not it happens. you see, that's the whole history of western civilization. this is the story of a robbery. on which a certain level of everything else is built. in principle until, well, it was possible to rob and agreed with it, then it somehow existed. and now they can not do not agree and this is a problem. well, the second. apparently, we will have to admit that the resource is finite and the question arises of how it will be distributed.

and here they are counting. what is what sergey said the core. well, i'll say the definition of the anglo-saxon core, because under that there a lot of philosophical historical. and there is everything else including europe by the way. it applies to everything else. and further levels will have to be introduced, sergeevich says not to develop. i'll just say the level of consumption. to whom how much is due and the fence is a big wall between atlantis or the world of light elves? or, as tolkien wrote, the magical west that exists there, which not everyone is destined to go to, in principle, and everything else that exists only to withdraw resources. how much on all this else should

stay people? and in what capacity this is a separate question, but the principle is clear enough to receive a resource from there, it is necessary that they serve the countries in due time. it was said in plain text millions to service. it was said directly. therefore, the word occurs on the next it turned out that the resource is not infinite. not infinitely, and it will have to be redistributed, and again it will have to be redistributed by force. well, what are they actually preparing for? what is my alternative? yes, in general, it is clear in a different system of redistribution of resources on other principles and other grounds. here the question is

open. well, because it is no coincidence, by the way, that an alternative to thinking first arose in thinking between capitalism and socialism, because capitalism comes from an infinite resource, and socialism is infinite and develops due to the correct management of this very finite resource. how it was in practice is a different story, because practice is an experiment has always been a soviet experiment. there is a chinese experiment different is an experiment, north korean cuban was, by the way, european socialism. also with the distribution system, so the question now is who will offer the world. the correct model for the organization in terms of awareness of the finiteness of resources and the rejection of the robbery of another in favor of its existence.

this is a fundamental question, and there can be more than one model. maybe, volodya, maybe, no. i'm just, but they all have to solve this problem one way or another, and limited resources are limited and finite resources, and for the sake of resources, of course, certainly. it seems to me that this is generally, as it were, an idea that is actually dangerous, because multizianism clearly follows from it, of course, does not accept. well, then it is necessary to somehow explain the non-limited resources. it has to be implemented somehow. but this is green energy. well , somehow you need an engine. it was all one philosopher's stone was hanging engine. it's all passed the philosopher's stone, no gold turns, and you can not think about anything, that is only philosophical chambers anymore. no way.

well, cold fusion, yes. how long term, how yes is ready to compete with you helium three say, the moon is now? let's get it, the main thing is to get to the moon. the gel is already there. there is someone to consume it, thanks, because if you want to manipulate consciousness with an illusion, and infinity of resources, well, then there will be only the next thing that offers. well, this is a very philosophical question. that is, infinity resources rather sufficiency resource. but the concept of a resource is how much does it cost? well, in the same way, when, when we are talking about energy in the 18th century, it seemed that the possibilities of generating energy in the world completely limit the possibilities of industrial production. after that, new forms

of energy generation appeared, after which it became clear. that is, just like the productivity of the land, the productivity of the soil was considered where mollusianism came from, which can feed a certain amount, then the achievement of agrochemistry appears and it turns out that completely another for some reason is a lot of things there reclamation, but progress is moving sharply, but the question of price. and here the west thinks correctly for itself. yes, he says it's easier to rob. it's easier to steal than to invest. that is, he follows a simple path, that is, colonization is a simple path. and now we say, all the guys, this path will end not only we say the world, says, more and more of these there is one more moment you invest. you can only rob. this is the difference between the spanish empire and the british empire, because the british robbed in invested. ah. well , they robbed one and the other. spain lived more cheerfully if you

look at the fact that we are moving so far, and look at the soviet union in the nineties, what was the nineties robbed of the remnants of the soviet union . they invested in us in the nineties more than anything, they are just the entire socialist camp, not only the soviet plus. uh, what happened to china is a completely new opportunity and due to this capitalism. expanded the problem is that now it has nowhere to expand. nowhere to what we say that guys? no, of course, he has room to expand, and therefore what has happened in ukraine now? well, they really say, yes. this is a consequence of our manifesto of december 15, when we say, guys, everything nato remove why do we say nato remove because we understand that they want to divide us. they see that over the past 20 years of heat we have accumulated sacrifice there. maybe rob again. why else

does nato need to end up at our borders here in the first place, and when china is behind get used to the base, right? and that you live too well correctly from the point of view of a white man, whose burden is too good, they live hindus indians are needed for another and africa is all needed. yes? well, of course, they took up japan and suffered that the japanese were buying up america and japan did so. oh well, they didn’t notice until now they can’t send what they did there at all was the eighties from germany and from japan germany is not yet so. but i understood, but then we began to go to the same wise men and said, yes, this was considered for us. they are

opened, like a tin can, and there is an advertisement. lead the week central events best correspondents great knowledge, a clear position and everything is fair with dmitry kiselyov sunday at 20:00. we have always admired you for those who break horizons, do not forget about those close to you who are not building a business, but the future of you who know that business is more important than big words and who know how to give more. what happened to the electors. i believe in hope, love is not

only like names, investing in their future living in a vast country. they set the sun on you there are already 25 million of those who trust us and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank of the year in russia traveling around russia tickets at the post office from partners and on nloto.ru national lottery new era of the lottery mildronate activator of my work ability and mental

activity mildronate i able to do very cool staging of battles. this is some kind of a new level like goosebumps. later, very bright and urgent, many events here and love and passion and tenderness. our response to hollywood river flows these songs sound, in a special way, amazing singer, amazing voice. this is a very high bar because this is the first semi-final.

forgive the thunderclouds so his soul and soul will sing. don't cry like that, raised in the last 5-10 seconds, and all attention is on the screen. come on all together to head watch all together tomorrow at 21:30, of course, the premiere on the russia channel you are moving into temporary command of the captain. i thought you were looking for my friend with sveta. artist continued to watch on monday at

21:20 well, being in this high meeting, as the chinese would say long-nosed barbarians. maybe everyone here is not a single chinese? no, here we are. come on, i can see a little bit from my hearth , then i’ll say it. moreover, the speeches of colleagues in the first part of our pag were extremely interesting, because i really listened to them with great interest, they give a lot. oh, thoughts on reflections of all three. thanks guys. i rarely say things like you, you know, so the first thing the world is going to? yes, what do we want to achieve first to fight back. we will not fight back, nothing will be achieved. the first place where i change the world, it is divided into the world

of dwarfs, small such ladies, who maybe they are democratic, but right now, who is not jean-pierre, how is it this little one or biden or a rhinestone, who is not a leaf, that manolik manuel macron or something else , that is, small party democrats who are nothing of themselves, including in the united states of america, i remind donald trump who is listening to donald trump now is not a much more famous donald trump, yes, in our country. he was a laughingstock and a cartoon series south park, the famous satire which as well the main theme for the gogata painted trump the president of america yo-molina people died. and

trump became the president of america well, yes, but at the same time he was, as it turns out. perhaps the best president of america for a long time, opanka , what the american elite has played to, and where theodore roosevel franklin did the roosevelts , where the guys who were someone biden, someone haris. well hello. and the second part of the world is a world called the world of authoritarian electorates, or whatever you want to call it, the world of people who are the leaders of their countries, what they like, do not like, sleep, my beauty quote from president putin putin si fashion, erdogan arab monarchies, arab authoritarian leaders of local military juntas. this is such a world, this is a world that has

retained the idea that, well, i am the sultan here in my country. what erdogan, right? well, putin is nothing like an emperor, or something, he performs the function of the all-russian emperor. excuse me. well, at the same time it performs, i am quite satisfied with this much more than he would have been with nicholas ii, whom everyone remembers. he still manages to do without repression , which i don’t understand at all how he manages to do it, but nevertheless he calls it. he can be any kind of dictator, this is the world of people who are responsible for their countries and for the people who live there. the point is . traditional values ​​are the same for all of us, but i have to sanctify the chords to the believing sulman, kirill is deeply, a believing orthodox and that we have different values, right? fine? today we just have a family of a man and a woman of children from you it is necessary to absorb it so that they do not die of hunger, it is

necessary to equip a decent life for people in their country, despite the fact that well, kadyrov uses words about jihad, or it is jihad for him. and we once said in the soviet union there is a holy war people's war. what is any difference? i don't see it in words. maybe it is in terms, but the feeling is exactly that, completely unprepared to live in a world where there will be a change of sexes in children, and without the consent of the parents, the child will be confused or they will tell him who he can be if he wants, guys, but you have everyone in the bathhouse for this. i will fight and kadyrov will be and kirill will be. well, in your field you need to be spiritual, well done. you remember, we were very good friends with our calm father dmitry smirnov. with the metropolitan and nothing now the

situation by country. there is such a pyramid system, yes, a hegemon or two pyramids a superpower, and the system there wants to call the olympic rings with concentric circles. mutually intersecting, they can be built as you like. this is e. the system that was before the superpowers. you have empire. it turned out that after the second world war, for a very short time there were two superpowers that can fix everyone and great powers that have some kind of nuclear bombs and that's it. and now we are moving away from this world into a world where there are strong players. this is certainly indonesia, which we never remember, but it exists, yes, what kind of west is it

because, of course, america crushed europe europe is not today, this is turkey and there is a big question here. where is the same hungary under turkey russia, our circles intersect, she and here is the tg and with us with oil or is she part the european union has china has india well, yes, strong players. and then about the markets. well guys, the mughal india existed so well with them. i just existed. there she was, and she was fine. and today's india also has an entry into central asia from pakistan willingly and the relationship with the identity pacific region and with africa, they restore what was under the british and the cholera industry is now the prime minister of the wangles. i'm not even talking about how many people in india, pakistan, they profess to be hindus. yes, only selfishness will tell us a holiday.

listen, marilyn monroe professed judaism, she was buried in a religious jewish cemetery until now. and how she eventually got married, and so she divorced, but she did not change her religion. i've always been proud of this. ah, i was always proud of this with our ambassador with gelin, yes, and he says, he says such free restless men for two days, but such restless, two days, in front of the embassy. we have a large office of the largest indian metallurgical corporation. they are two days old. fireworks are fired and drums are beaten, you see here it is straight. here is a table. who rules the world according to indian. uh. well, that's why these worlds were drunk by corporations. now there are many. yep, that's what

you said. for a while we had the two strongest players, america and china. but the next world is the world. these systems, these balls. imagine it as non-planar, but voluminous, which slightly intersect, flow into one another, compete, maybe they will interlock and conflict somewhere, like mine with turkey but this is what started and what he built the incumbent russian president, by the way, is also a part of this pipe-plus. yes, when the main oil-producing countries, including not only the opekovites, could take brix with them as another infrastructure, india and the sco and china the sco. and turkey and mine went with and devil's cloud pakistan how long did he fight with india? well, we manage to find a common language with the turks in syria, and we manage to find a common language with iran and the postures of the caucasus, and we can manage with central asia

, this is a completely different world. i do not take the liberty to say what will happen in africa now. although already you can see some points of bifurcation and latin america but it's interesting about it in modeling it's interesting dmitry yes, well, evgeny yanovich is good. so figuratively described the idea of ​​what andrei and i call the world of regions. that's the way to put it, so i won't thank god thank you eugene everything is fine. that's why i actually, really it and that we are that we are not. well, for starters, you need some things. it seems to me to disavow the whole thing in the fact that uh this is probably uh from the point of view of hmm such a clear knowledge of black and white. well, probably so the west, like, robbed all his life and already built something on top of the loot from the point of view. well, those who, well, if not all western europe, i just want to

say that, as it were, there is 1.250 for some year. now i don’t remember it exactly. there weren’t any geographical discoveries yet. the first university in europe has already opened this unique achievement. yes, yes. well, yes, the spaniards of cordoba constantly tell me about this, but that's not the point . it was in europe anyway, the arabs open, only the kurt was not european. well yes. here option what to build sorbon? nothing, yes, where are the texts of aristotle i would like to pay attention. and the texts of aristotle came to them in a natural way. i would say so. here. yes, of course, that is the world. naturally. let's still this is the natural way. this is the mixing of nations. well, let's do it again, so once again the west, that's the whole point both the west and europe, and by the way, the president also said about this in

an amazing way that this is the west and that europe that really represented in general human and in many ways christian values. although we still had a lot to decrease. he is not a stranger to us. he is not alien to us, not in the sense that he is directly native to us in the sense that he is not alien to us. well, listen, there we are people who live in historical russia, we all received education, probably all in the soviet union. that is, such a double denial of this very west , nevertheless, and jack london and deakins, and further , mark twain and everything. they read this and when the start began, a special military operation and began to cancel dostoevsky tchaikovsky and so on. what the president also spoke about very much today. liked these posters on the street. i don't know, maybe some don't. and we will not cancel mark twain, this, in my opinion, is a very important thing, because when we say who we are, what we are attractive for is no longer important, for whom this is a separate conversation. can we be attractive to someone outside? i think that we can that any

idea is good, formulated. inside, it is universal, especially with us, because what's on my mind. uh, we like to talk about our russian uniqueness in fact, russia and in general, as it were, here is the russian movement, the russian state. it is just remarkable and maybe, such a play on words is unique, just because of its versatility, in fact, that is why it was possible to collect it. so many ethnic groups, so many religions, so many people, so on the basis of anna, so to speak, the titans of the french musical genre managed to create a great russian ballet. on the basis of fiction, it was possible to create the great russian literature, and everyone speaks russian ballet, but because he became great when he became russian, although, in fact, this is, well, an imported adaptation, sort of, as if formally approached, but in reality we are now, so to speak, we are approaching this crisis that we have there are precisely such people for whom human life is really. not alien. but the culture

of death is real. it's you who's on fire. you deal with this yourself, this is yours, we do not climb to you. well, it doesn't matter to us either. and therefore it is very important that what will happen here and from here. really, really million arises. naturally, through. but with what sergei ivanovich began. can the west exist without japan of its own, so can he or he the whole world, where will he go? well, he's not going anywhere, well, of course, there may be such a situation that we will all go to heaven, they will die, but today i repeated this phrase again. why then the world, which they actually have . there are only three ways, the third one, which they still do not understand yet, but are already groping for, even according to anthony blinke at the head of the department. it appears they can either burn the whole world in a nuclear war, that is, die. we will go to heaven. so either they can run away at the moment when

the resources in this particular direction finally run out, as they fled from afghanistan, uh, or they can still quite intelligently retreat from 2011. i just read constantly american writings on the subject until they are taken into the establishment to make decisions. but for the time being, they didn’t take a lot of things, for example, the works of detente of their likely government, and in the seventies they took it and all our current diplomacy today is based, by the way, speaking precisely on that time. so it's a matter of variety here. let him win. the most important. that's really what we will have here. so i would like to point out one danger, which is connected precisely with our universality, precisely with the fact that this european civilization is really here before the perversions. that's before she gave up on herself. here she renounced god renounced herself . that's up to this point. she really we were, not a stranger, a lot of classics wrote about this, well, given this very circumstance,

as well as the extreme depravity of those generations who studied at school and died, already, actually borrowed textbooks and borrowed methods and which now there is a special operation shoots, weapons guns. we try to build, ruble pricing president makes speeches. and at this very time. tomorrow morning the students will come to their departments and they will be told about the interconnected globalization world. about liberal theories and so on, yes, it’s all in one heap, and teachers will do it, because it’s supposed to be. well, it's the same thing, and it's the same at school. here's the full transmission yesterday. i remember how long it was there. how many hours how many pages how many chapters does dean have, for example, the great patriotic war, an extremely sacred time in, so to speak, in historical russia, how many four pages are there? who signed it 4 hours four, all the

more, well, what's the difference, that is, in this sense, since this is so, then not only those people who fled through the upper lars, having stormed it with heroic efforts. well, the people who are here . these people, whom, due to our own oversight, they are all this low europe, who were not completely alien to dostoevsky. but europe is the current europe, which crossed out itself and sawed out of the world. it is still in their minds and hearts, and since it is taught in universities, then remember how putin called the greatest geopolitical catastrophe. the collapse of the soviet union for these people in the conditions of freedom which represent our country in comparison with the european one. current. she turns out to be at home. and here is the problem. because in conditions when all the flowers are blooming and we are against totalitarian hegemony. we are against totalitarian education and everything else, like how all these

people want to build this europe here, because there is nowhere else, because america sorry, because europe ended just as a place for a comfortable life, and these people need comfort and this comfort russia can provide with its resources. america is self-isolating with its auxes, there are no extra people needed, but here these people will want to build europe again and all those unfinished professors from berkeley to st. petersburg to moscow and, so to speak, up to shanghai, even they will all come here to teach this business. and if you find it, it will be glad to eat it, because it eats from school. here it is in my opinion, one of the main dangers in this situation, upper lars , but for them to come, i would have a simple task. tomorrow the university had to start changing school university programs tomorrow. that is, i always say tomorrow. here is tomorrow. it’s just that this should be a task, because otherwise you won’t

need any of this, because either harsh repressions that no one wants, or we will dissolve in perverses, as they are called, uh, sergey ivanovich, these will not be those for me who wrote them. yes, the reasons for the order. so, to change people who are not written. but listen to this somehow always a difficult topic about repression, but the rigidity of clarity of will is always needed otherwise it does not happen. i agree. he is a very accurate performance. but that 's why we say sorry. give us the right to be us. that is, we do not need to tell us what we should be, we told them everything. let's sort it out ourselves, so i say, we must now say this to ourselves. yes, we must answer our own question. and what are we like if we say that traditional values ​​are there today in the state duma? yes, the law passed well in the first reading. prohibition there are advertisements or lgbt propaganda there, but it is necessary that,

in addition to this law, there should be a whole system of understandable values. you understand, this is sometimes not even at the level of the law, some make laws in russia change a well-known historical feature. yes, look, in the united states it is not said anywhere, but everyone understands to propagate this traditional family. but if you do it in berkeley or in new york, then such a construction, of course, is the work of civil society for the rest of your life. you should educate yourself well. intolerance for death. and everything that is shoved to us by this new group. this death is strong. and if we talk about education and its educational models, 2006 comes to mind. e spoke then that minister of education forsenko, and he said one sacramental phrase about russian education, in which the system characterizes its state to this day. in general, it works fine, but does not perform. the main function is formal. yes, we have laws, and we write textbooks and those of the

great patriotic war are already devoted much more time, but for now, anyway, the mass consciousness is still really affected by this post-european virus, if you want to say. and if i can put it this way, speaking more globally, if we consider the situation with the whole, as i wrote and our president in my speech, then we really see here on the one hand, and such a bunch of degenerating, uh, our gnomes, i don’t know the former elves sharply darkened, and in the collective west the dark elf yes and who are trying, uh, to save dominance at any cost. if you listen carefully, what the same linkin is saying but this is essentially the same missionism with which they went through the entire 19th century, the entire century, respectively, without uh, the leading role of america, according to blinkin, there is no,

nor any possibility for the further development of mankind globalization, which has been imposed over the past 560 years, is again an american global challenge, but in the era of globalization there was an attempt to implement the project, and the dismantling of the nation state and instead, yes, regionalization, that is, i act locally, thought globally, as they taught, but in fact, power gradually passed through the media through non-profit organizations into the hands of transnational international companies, which, already buying entire media outlets , set up entire media cartels, in fact, through soft power there by manipulating the public consciousness of their politicians, and it came in fact. this is a generation of e-suicidal europe of e-suicides of the collective west, but at the same time, more and more hmm , such a very tough and essentially anti-human doctrine. this is transhumanism, which we spoke about today, it is actually a doctrine, the destruction of a person,

the destruction of the spheres of responsibility of each individual of each state, after all, a person. e, if this is a normal person, not a trans person, not a post person, i don’t know what else to call him e he has several circles of responsibility, responsibility personally responsible for the family responsibility for his e, for his ethnicity, for his own for his people, responsible for your state responsibility, if this is a believer for responsibility for their confession, in the end, the violation of these boundaries of responsibility leads to e, but if you want, first of all, their blurring and hmm, in fact, and the fall of responsibility for their confessional affiliation. these are the same religious wars, for example, the extermination of the huguenots in france, on the one hand, the fall of responsibility for their country. this is a civil war, in fact, a kingdom that will be divided in itself. let a bright example perish there we are we see in ukraine, uh, 30. years of the journey from a divided society to a collapsed state, uh,

responsibility for the family will fall into adultery, the breakdown of the family will go responsible for himself. but this is already some kind of deviance. this is schizophrenia. these are various, uh, disorders and all the notorious 74 genders. uh, so uh, really the collective smell is confused. how many 64 yes 364 the deputy of the alternative from germany in his address, or rather a greeting in lantagi, counted 74, but, truthfully, he read it to me on the thirtieth line. how else is one of the most famous scoloistic discussions about how many angels will fit on the end back on its own, don't you think that the discussion of the number of genders. i am not quite the seriousness of the application different there was the end of the needle. yes, by chance look children no, wait, stop running into yevgeny yanych, he meant. what is the end of the story? by the way, the decline of europe and all the rest, too, uh, meanwhile, uh,

in addition to the decaying west and, in fact, and really proclaiming the end of history, and there is a flourishing complexity speaking, in the language of konstantin leontiev there are really different, and models of different development paths. eh, really. uh, the world that is now it is already called pre-globalization, post, globalization. well, what will it come to, either there will really be some kind of intersecting three-dimensional circles that will interact, or it will be in terms of the level of division into two or three mega blocks there, as for india, it’s still not a fact which block this wool is, or something, yes? accordingly, i'm sorry if large, firstly, fidelity to the spiral ball, but i can’t imagine not a mathematician, so uh, here the world is really moving into a new phase. and now,

the right of a strong world politics, which hmm, in which kholmsky reproached us for example, the united states, it is gradually fading away, but strength, as a physical phenomenon. it doesn’t go anywhere anyway , which means that if someone weakens according to the law of conservation of energy, someone becomes stronger, and we really see and the power of china is growing, uh, russia focuses on saying, we are still china very much it is curious that today the minister of foreign affairs of russia and china ivana made a number of statements that such direct china will support russia strengthening its status as a major power in the international arena. and the second tape will support russia in the implementation of the goals of the development strategy, translated from chinese - this is a very serious statement. this was called a very serious statement, just in defiance of everything that the americans demanded from them about russia,

if you translate from chinese diplomacy to european or russian - this is already a statement, but a vector for the creation of a military-political union, therefore, let's see what the next five to ten years will lead to, really. the task of russia in the next 3-4 weeks. now let's see what happens? what supplies? here it will be interesting. uh, already some argue that iran is going there in commercial quantities of tactical missiles, maybe, of course, disinformation has every right to its own development, any attempts to block the path of moscow and beijing will not be crowned with success. but this is straight exactly the logic of speeches in the logic of you. putin in essence affairs. uh, this uh illustrates very clearly what we were talking about today, that centers of power are indeed being formed, new geopolitical alliances are being formed. and uh, what will be, there for a temporary log there for 3-4 weeks. it was,

relatively speaking, waiting for the basis or foundation for further development, because indeed we are now experiencing a global perturbation of such phenomena as the actual collapse of the e-economy of the eu economy, which he is talking about, only lazy recently at a seminar by the former minister of foreign affairs. austria caries. said that in fact, the european union will not survive the next challenge this time of the energy crisis. e. well, uh, maybe she's exaggerating a little, of course , but energy inflation is already a squabble. here, look how they built just for the night. with ivanovna a certain. in general, mr. macron mice are represented, but in fact, for what? first of all, scholz, in fact, raised the fate of european security. uh, the handhog made a purchase of american f-35 air defense systems for the united states. but before, the french they counted on a unified european security system, including france, and threw off the risks of the ukrainians on the very decision to buy the american one.

yes, as a matter of fact. yes, substitutes, so to speak. e wonderful. uh, they say that after all, schultz will be kept in the role of the function of the federal because long-term elections in germany are dangerous for their unpredictability, but the dispute is not only a question and security issues of gas issues, to whom the gas from german gas storages will go, which can already be on all simply not enough, respectively. the franco-german tandem is collapsing before our eyes. and this means that the center actually begins. uh , the tendencies in the european union are certainly unconditional. this is all against the backdrop of degradation, uh, the humanitarian sphere against the background of degradation, uh, and european industry. will the professors from the sorbon run there from the city or from göttengen, where, really? yes, they say russia needs more migrants, but francieme, maybe it's worth accepting the offer. that's what i'm afraid of, that here is an engineer

engineer, please, these global impressions all, respectively. well, the era of global upheavals and transformations. it only begins the soviet union when they needed how many 600 americans more than 400,400,000, because it is documented, of course, as if the thrusts were many different people, yes and nothing. so only they, then the speech, therefore, they took what they needed and said goodbye, in general, russia has always been able to work with foreigners. look yes, for how many centuries this resource has been brilliantly used, so do not give up the historical past. and what i'm sorry, i'm the first russian university, mikhail vasilievich lomonosov, well. how much did you teach and who from where? who should he throw an inkwell to

? the president of the russian academy of sciences were emigrants from germany . i fully support, this and so on. here. but i want to predict that here is the thesis, where will they go, right? eh, i think it's debatable. i will be very happy if this model is, as it were, implemented in practice. here's to me it seems that another model will be implemented, a and i will try to get others somewhere. yes, ah , they stayed and established everything that they discuss those models other fifths means, what cunning ways to maintain dominance, they do not discuss anything else. so now, when we talk about whether western culture is successive to us, how it is in their ratios , again, i absolutely agree, when everything is clear and the sharp gali sense and the gloomy germanic genius. all

this is true, but only as soon as it all passes on russian soil. it's impossible to even know. there was such a famous writer ivan bunin yes, even a talented man, and he was now talking about the need, he wanted to shorten tolstoy's war and peace yes, so that it would become completely aesthetically ideal, but tolstoy did not think in terms of the goncourt prize and preached with the grace of a tolstoy. and what worked out, it worked out, and every time the russians started, how would great artists take something western into service, it turned out that the west could not even recognize so much, uniting with the russian spirit and russian originality, that it acquired a different world-historical character, a different world-historical character, and this is very important. it seems to me, but today, as far as these ratios are concerned, now what we are actually dealing with. well, let's call the truth with you

words, so to speak, as if before the attraction of all this era, putin tried to do one thing. to combine the liberal market economy with the strong statehood is all the formula of putinism. now means further it turns out that in the new historical conditions - this formula is impossible. it contradicts the new loads of the world of everything else then, what they are trying to do, and it is very clear to me, what they are trying to do in the conditions of the anti-soviet consensus. in hebrew. yes, as you know , they are looking for pockets, they say the same wallet. where are you? why don't you come here? he says i'm afraid, what if it's not there, they are trying to do something conservative already from this conservative himself. the west refuses to be embarrassed by them, embarrassed by themselves everything else, when the values ​​of the french revolution of a strong state. nations are the only

ones trying to keep everything else back in the west. these people turn out to be mginals and almost fascists. and they would have been in the mainstream 20-30 years ago. so, all this conservatism. they take it to hell, we are trying to take it, and we are trying to become a country of classical conservative modernity. so i would be happy if it were, but it won’t be, the whole question is that if russia wants to withstand the loads that it has, it needs to to understand the first there is this world of conservative modernity, and it is chinese vietnamese and others, asian there is this world of postmodern western there is obviously american-sponsored, anti-modernist, archaic, including igila, and so on there is something that we need to take, what we need to bring to the world in order for it to be sustainable. and this is something really russian - this is

a new thing. and here comes the next danger. well, how inside all this business they will begin to refuse. from humanism, from history, as such from much more, grandson, we will fly to where the new trap will be about the same as the liberal economy before it. it’s like they are sniffing at something like that then russia will really be driven into a corner, so the conceptual discussion and its implementation in practice. this question is a politically topical issue of deeds and the near future now we will continue advertising with the nose of who is against tomorrow at 14:55 on the russia channel, even where the cold reigns

, is there one who is stronger? you understood an international brand with many years of expertise in development engine oils for harsh climates where quality standards are paramount you fight diamond impeccable quality for flawless engine performance even under the most severe operating conditions. you're a boyld damond butter hardened by cold. buy at gas stations and boyle music presents a subscription until the end of the year for 0 rubles. vk music try cutlets with pasta and puree. only cherkizovo from the meat of your own farmer travels through russia guest houses at affordable prices 150.000 options for every taste. and a super cashback of 30%. here are the clips

it is a meeting place for millions of people, people who have something to show and people who have something to see. you can scroll endlessly through the feed, choose your favorite categories, mark what you like. and what you don't like. and smart algorithms will select videos for everyone to taste. look, vkontakte clips or in the new separate application vk clips are a meeting place for impressions.

movies on weekends, do you have any memories are you at home waiting for your husband to miss the premiere on saturday at 21:00. you look at some emotions, without looking away directly given very big in the heart. this is a sweater masterpiece

absolutely cinematic. simply bravo is a very cool spectacular action game. how many battle scenes there are, it turned out to be a copy of the lapuska full of manual slaughter. despite the dynamism, this is still a movie about love as a weapon, it was grandiose, i can tell you the game of thrones is resting. it is interesting that the topic of ukraine was not mentioned in putin's main speech? that is, it was a question of much more global issues, but the questions when vladimir vladimirovich had already answered yes, of course. it

was not possible to bypass this, as it were, such a broad slogan we don’t leave our own, he actually sits deep in the heart of every russian and e, representatives of other ethnic groups of russians. and the willingness to fight for their people leads to the cohesion of society, this has always been a huge strength of our country. we confirmed and strengthened it. and this is the most. the main thing is that people have been living under shelling for 8 years, which, by the way, continue to this day. we had to decide something for ourselves. and that we could decide to recognize their independence, but recognize their independence and just leave it to the mercy of fate. well, that's totally unacceptable. this means that we should have done the following, what we have done, include them in the russian state. they alone will not survive. this is an obvious fact, but if we admit

, um, then, uh, we include the composition of the russian state at their will. we know the mood of the people. eh, yes, uh, these same shellings and hmm and being prepared. uh, regular military operations by the kiev regime are ongoing and inevitable. the two of them carried out two large-scale military operations, which ended unsuccessfully, but they were, but for shelling, uh, of course continued further. what we had to do to carry out the operation, but what to wait until they start and we know what they are preparing. well, of course, this is just an inevitable logic of events, and this logic was not formed by us. well, in 2014 why was it necessary to carry out a coup d'etat in ukraine yanukovych actually gave up power agreed to hold elections ahead of schedule it was clear that,

well, the chances, uh, would not offend me, but he had little chance. if they existed at all and why it was necessary to carry out bloody anti-state anti-constitutional coup? there is no answer, but perhaps only one to show who is the witness in the owner's house to everyone. excuse me, in front of brownies. i beg your pardon. everyone will sit on the priest evenly and will not quack as we say, but that's different. i just can't explain these actions. a coup d'état was carried out by people who did not want to recognize this either in crimea or in the donbass, and everything went and everything came to today, to today's tragic events. well, what bothered, there is already the so-called west implement the agreements that were reached in minsk