what fans of high art did not share, such a performance brings the intelligentsia to drak, looking for an extra ticket. here, only those who have the cherished bracelets, the rest of the guards do not let through, just wait for the country to forge victory, how the clubs of pensioners near moscow turned into factories for sewing things for the front, the people who cannot be defeated, we participate in a big cause, we just want only we have the main stories that happened next on sunday exactly eighty. all news is always available on the media platform, see in the application or on the site smotrim.ru, and by this time denis panchenkov was with you. see you.

good afternoon. this is a program, who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio of dmitry kulikov, inflation in italy accelerated to 11.9% per annum, having updated, a recession has begun in the german economy for a maximum of 38 years, the german press writes about this. here is the president of germany staneier. he said that hard times are coming. and he also said that uh, the entire previous historical period of building relations and uh, interaction with russia ended continue without him. well, it’s interesting that the first

stanmeier is able to connect with the second one or not. e minister of foreign affairs. china said that beijing intends to support russia in achieving strategic development goals. we can say with certainty today. the strategic development goals of russia and china largely coincide. we are striving to build a more just multipolar world free from the hegemot. both russia and china devoted their annual meeting of the discussion club to this problem. valdai where yesterday russian president vladimir putin spoke here. listen to what he said at the end of his speech, summarizing everything that was said in the opening speech. the collapse of the soviet union also destroyed the balance of geopolitical forces. the west felt like a winner and proclaimed a

unipolar world order in which only its will, its culture, its interests had the right to exist. now this historical period of undivided domination. west in world affairs. ends up in the past for polar world. we are at a historical frontier. ahead is probably the most dangerous unpredictable and at the same time important decade since the times. e the end of world war ii. the west is not able to single-handedly manage humanity, but it is desperately trying to do it, and most of the peoples of the world no longer want to measure it. this is the main contradiction of the new era, in the words of a classic , the situation, to a certain extent, the revolutionary top cannot. they do not want to live like this, in the words of a classic. this state of affairs is fraught global conflicts or a whole chain

of conflicts. e, what is a threat to humanity, including the west itself, to constructively and creatively resolve such a contradiction, this is the main today's historical task, the change of age, the process of painful, but natural and inevitable, the future world order is being formed before our eyes and in this world order. we must listen to everyone. uh, it's a listening approach. but, by the way, it is also necessary to listen to those, first of all, who have for this sufficient subjectivity. here is the line about subjectivity, which was generally one of the main lines that i took yesterday during this discussion with the experts of the president of the russian federation. by the way, this was divided quite clearly. he welcomed the countries that have sovereignty and strive to maintain subjectivity and very well. they called everyone names. there it is both china

and india, it is put by both turkey and saudi arabia. and brazil e. by the way, well, regarding the assassination of the iranian general, suleiman gave his very hard assessment. that is, this whole part of the world, which we call on the one hand. well, we call it not the west. we may not have found yet, so to speak, the necessary language here, but on the other hand, this is the world's majority, right? here is the term. i like e more because i'm really the world's majority on the one hand, and on the other hand, of course, there were estimates and hmm of a different state of states. well, this concerned, for example, there are discussions around europe , well, not to mention ukraine, yes, that is, ukrainian subjectivity is not considered at all. sulfur is worth one phrase about negotiations. well, maybe it 's hello to you. well, probably the negotiations of ukraine will go to them, then, when america gives her an order about

this, then ukraine will go to negotiations. got, of course, european countries. both soft and hard. well, we are really discussing here. well, for several months we have been fixing, well, just from life we ​​are fixing the loss of subjectivity of european countries. well, that's about the main circle e questions. and, of course, revolution. the situation, moreover, the world revolutionary situation is another classic. i mean trotsky, here he, of course, imagined the world revolution in a different way, but logically he argued that it would definitely come someday. well , now president putin fixes that such a situation can be considered oleg, you were there directly. well, then you have the floor, really. uh, there were very interesting meetings, there was a deep, uh, speech by the president with, uh, a lot

of historical quotes references to famous russian philosophers and historians, and almost all of their meetings were held here, under this leitmotif. yes, that the world is not reduced only to western countries, that the world talked much more and very much about equality in international relations, that certain countries, the united states or someone cannot dictate their terms to others, they spoke, uh, a lot about anti-colonial e dimension, yes, one of the president’s recent speeches about this e was also in valdai, and now he is also in valdai, e, he spoke and, accordingly, e, but this dimension is yes rather anti-colonial anti-colonial anti- colonial struggle movement. it is closely connected with the issue of social justice with the issue, and the protection of the rights of workers with

the issue in a good sense. uh, everything that the classics and contemporaries of socialism and marxism told us. that is, this topic of left-wing ideas, it does not seem paradoxical at first glance, it was one of the key ones at many meetings of the valdai forum this time, and it was reflected both in the president’s speech and in issues that the euro itself demand, demand a salary increase. quite right. yes well , since socially, everything else grows from the socio-economic rights of the workers, and it is important that it was presented. eh, very wide. and this is a world majority, indeed, a very good phrase, and representatives from africa and asia and latin america, and it is important that there was a fairly large representation from western countries. and, accordingly, here the expert blockade of russia did not work out, and president putin is also very

spoke clearly in response to questions. he said that the west cannot be perceived as a monolith yes , it is not integral, it is not integral, because it is. uh, the west of high culture west uh, really high technical achievements, and to refuse, but it's stupid. yes, but there is not a real west that is pursuing this expansionary policy, and again the president made an assessment that even now, uh, even in the current difficult and difficult conditions, russia has a lot of friends in the west and a lot of people who perceive our ideas , who perceive our thoughts and thus the situation is by no means lost. i have a question for my colleagues, and then you will answer, of ​​course, i’m really interested, because i’m with other participants, and i spoke to your forum and they just had the point of view that there were few westerners this time i was not there. i can only judge by the

television picture who asked the questions. i followed this closely from the well of the classical west there was only one canadian. and who is so strongly opposition in views. you even look a little like julian ansanja. and, well conditionally to the west can be attributed to hungary. here i am , i saw two. maybe they really were more active on the panels, what kind of people they are, because my interlocutors also told me that this time there were no those who could really ask tough questions . the discussion, or that is, there were mainly those, well, who are more or less our shadow supporters. i would pay attention to who asked questions, who was the most visible in the hall. but this is in general, uh, brix countries roughly speaking, uh, india china twice south africans asked question, in addition to this, i noticed that pakistan is also there, in general, our partner. come on , south korea is not exactly an ally of russia, sri lanka, but in general, mostly such states, which, of

course, confirms this general trend, which is also from the president’s speech. putin was obvious. that is, it is an anti-western manifesto. this is a turn and ideological political and economic. in general, in the direction of what we have not yet found a normal term. who says it, the global south, not the west, the third former third world. in general, this is how everything is indicated. it was extremely clear what else i paid attention to, but there was no bitterness. by the way, speaking, here we know putin in different ways, he is evil, he was not evil here in relation. the west is somehow already, in my opinion, a little bit in him, this exasperation has passed somehow calmly philosophical. he made it clear that the west is no longer on the way. a confrontation lies ahead. god forbid, non-nuclear, here we already have to especially thank fyodor

lukyanov how they played this wonderfully with the president without a scene. and that's why a and that's i also noticed how differently putin spoke about the united states and about europe and the united states. well, it’s clear that without much love, but with respect, with unfailing respect, and between the lines slipped what moscow would like most from washington nothing now does not receive. this is mutual respect. until they are so tense. in general, relations are on the verge of war , and europe even without respect, that is, and europe well, with some kind of nostalgia, there were probably illusions. he certainly has a man brought up in something on german culture and an order that knows germany, we already know what kind of illusions putin had with regard to germany, i’m afraid that they are gone in relation to the united states but hope remains. i think not only he, but all of us have that sooner or later we will sit down to negotiate, including to resolve this crisis around ukraine. it seems that only with the americans. he is ready to

talk about it. well, it's not about what the president is ready for. yes? this is an important thing, because it became clear that you can’t talk to avatars. well, this example around syria, it was absolutely amazing, and i think that the president, without naming names, everyone can, to the best of their ability, so to speak, substitute an idea of ​​who was there on the other side. yes, vis-a- vis says so. he said, when he returned, then to paris yes, there was this phrase in the same place. m. here is maxim , how vigilant you understand, and i am very purposeful even these nuances, and so everyone, to the best of their ideas, can imagine who did it on the other side. here maxim thinks it was yes? uh, yes, of course, but you know, this picture. yes, it does reproduce. we are with you as experts who follow all the events. we can go deep enough. e this picture. well

, what was it worth just one signing of an agreement with yanukovych yes, and either there, uh, then the minsk agreements, by the way, it also seemed to the president, well, they signed it, and then they admit it. a few years later, they signed, well, they were not going to fulfill it, and everything was poroshenko and these same guarantors. yes, uh the parisierrins all recognized what to perform. well, what is the meaning then what can be negotiated? if at first you don't, well, negotiate, uh, with a figure that is not responsible for its obligations, but does not respond at all. here, but on the other hand, even if there is a signature, then it does not mean anything after that, this was analyzed in detail, and therefore what you said, maxim, is not due to the fact that we are well, as if the question of what something of respect or disdain, and in mind meaninglessness, because the president emphasized many times during

speeches that he believes in common sense. well, here is the lack of common sense, that is, the national interests and the prime minister or president, who should protect them. well, that's the state of affairs today. there is no one in the customs office, if you remember our cinema. you know, i will also share my observations in many ways. i agree with maxim in general in order to evaluate. where we are moving, we are developing or de. it is necessary to take some kind of reference point. yes, and it seems to me that it is not by chance that every time we discussing the situation of the current day, we always take in well, in terms of the world order of the processes that take place in this direction, we take the ninety- first year. the only thing i for example, well, i do not quite agree that after the ninety- first year we entered, well, into a new phase of the new world order. i think we've just entered the new citizen phase. just world turmoil. here. uh, when this world mess it wasn't based on some kind of

compromise agreement. yes, there, taking into account, as it were, opinions other strong political players, but exclusively on the rules that were written only by the americans. yes, well, he considers himself in all respects apparently they showed to whom they were not shown, but they voiced each time they voice everything now the rules are like this first we mean, uh, let's expand trade. here you join the wto, open ry. globalization and so on. everyone agreed to this program, then they see they lose to china, they lose, russia starts to raise here. no-no-no-no. wait, what wto what world guys are there? i'm not everything, it's already in past. let's build. uh, on the basis of some new new rules, what kind of putin i saw him, again, we need to take a starting point. it seems to me, here i am, for example, for myself i appreciate putin, whom i knew before the beginning of my own. yes, and putin after his. it seems to me that here are the last ones in his speech. he was as confident as

before the beginning of all these events there was some period of time, apparently tense. yes. at the beginning of a special military operation, it seemed to me that something had accumulated a lot problems that needed to be addressed. yes, and look for some options for resolving issues. now i saw absolutely a person who understands, knows these processes and sees how they can actually be solved. he became more confident, he became, well, as if so assertive, and it seems to me that we saw the very putin we knew. in general, you had all these remarks, especially maxim well, actually westerners were different. it's just that earlier, but the representatives of the west were mostly. well, you can say such patented sovietologists, yes, the kremlinologists who came here collected some gossip rumors, then they returned and, as a

rule, wrote nasty things about russia here. there is one very revealing example back in the zero years, very briefly there was such fiona hille, who worked in the republican administration in the states, who once at some meeting was photographed next to vladimir putin, she was needed for foreign guests and then they ask her, but fiona is there in the states well, you are not ashamed to be photographed next to putin, because that there is a tyrant dictator and that's it. she says, yes, it's a shame, i understand everything, but when i take this photo, my fees grow. these were westerners before, and now others have arrived who are real comrades-in-arms, who tell us it doesn’t matter who putin is and what you have inside russia, but we see that now russia and putin are an outpost of the struggle against world imperialism. and these are our goals and our ideals, so we will be together in our speech understands, of course. i, too, about putin and valdai, his speeches are average. uh, vladimir putin i didn’t say a word about ukraine, but here are the questions

and answers. yes, the most interesting thing happened for me. i listened carefully. i tried to understand the new notes as well. i heard them, by the way, some some questions. i got answers. well, for example, it may be out of order, but this is how i perceive it. vladimir putin said that russia, for me, the only guarantor of state ukraine can act in russia, he said, yes, of this, the creators are the founders, right? second, of course, vladimir putin said that, uh, this war, including civil war in part, in part in part, but the word, i beg your pardon. i'm in my own way, yes, partly civil. this is also important for me, because you repeatedly have this, in principle, objectively, when we know that from both parts, and the opponents of the opposing forces are russians against russians and ukrainians against ukrainians, and ukrainians against russians, and so

on . and this is important, because uh, you know, why hide what is really and when the president of your country, says so, well, it's important third, but about odessa or odessa there was very much this question. let us muscovites used to say odessa, but the truth is, yes. those who speak from ukraine, let's come on, let's say in odessa, i'm odessa at home. can we continue now? it’s just that i was born and raised in the donbass, and my pronunciation alone is not connected with the donbass. and with the fact that for several years i have been in high school every summer i tried to go there, and i loved and still love both this city and these people. well, that is, i got sick as a teenager and i was taught to speak in odessa, there is odessa, if someone in odessa says,

odessa was there, people call it. well , i'll tell you, and shalands full of mullets of water soo, kostya brought singing alberts. type in youtube you are wonderful. i don't mind mark bernes thank you very much. in general, i wanted to finish my thought. continue so this is very symptomatic, because the question was tricky, and the answer is like putin, like he said that odessa can be a city in different ways, it can be a city, as a confrontation of the contradictions of disputes. well, and so on, and it can also be a city, but a peacemaker, but by and large , one more thing was important to me. he said that catherine made odessa better and until now the nationalists cannot even remove her monument. and now it's time to try. yes, but the most important thing, uh, i was hooked by the fact that vladimir putin walked through, in fact, the war itself, that part of the military part

of what is happening in ukraine in general, from everything else. there, of course, this is a public thing. can be reviewed? i realized that e no e vladimir putin is at least a purposeful person hmm such a goal, but to destroy ukraine a. no, there is no goal to capture ukraine. goals to occupy ukraine but if he has a sincere goal, let's say, to complete this operation, will this military operation be a draw? how about me? i love the term nothing. yes, it seems to me that after all, he has such a goal, and to complete this operation, this military conflict, as quickly as possible, they are a draw. yes, this is my subjective opinion. you know, i won't even argue with you or e i won't argue. although i have there may be some considerations, i will add only one. do you understand what the matter is, let's say that this is so?

but at the same time, you need to understand, er, the next thing, that what you call a draw for the united states and zelensky a is clear that he is bobik on a leash. yes, this is, well, obviously completely this defeat is a disaster, a draw. for them, a disaster, they showed up. well, they are so invested in it provoking their own. yes? well, this is now, well, creating the inevitability of the word. they are so laid on this, as on the mechanism that will lead to the destruction of russia, we should have ceased to exist this year according to their plan, and they would have dealt with china for this, all the monstrous provocation was needed so that we could no longer, well, ignore this situation. they have achieved this. well, now you know the question, like from a ukrainian joke. well, what did it give you? and well, in

america, for them, this is everything, what you call nothing, this is the defeat of ukraine, they watched this performance. and it seems to me that it is very important for ukrainians to listen to these words, because we are in ukraine you know, as we understand, listen, we had a president and yanukovych was zelensky well, there will be no zelensky what difference will we have other presidents if there is a state and if the state remains one, that's all. this is blocking the state, you are no longer there, the state has deprived you, the united states of america is here. listen to girby answer a reporter's question. uh reno news. i danced from putin. no-no- the question did not even begin to argue with you. although we have something to talk about, but you look at the hosts look ukrainian. you in a red tie u.s. officials recently said that it is inappropriate for the moment to

negotiate between russia and russia on a peaceful settlement of the ukraine conflict group moreover, we said inappropriately that the negotiations between russia and the united states peace negotiations for ukraine are inappropriate moreover the state department recently said that the united states never did not hear about this message from the russians about readiness for dialogue and diplomacy. although president putin has just said that russia is frankly open to negotiations and waiting for the us to send a signal ukraine on this issue the question is whether there is any resistance on the part of the united states in the context of negotiations, which could be a style for the united states to start such negotiations, if the white house understands that the conflict in ukraine cannot end without a direct dialogue between russia and the us thank you if the understanding in the white house that the

conflict in ukraine cannot end without direct dialogue between russia and the us at all is a really good question. be careful now that we've said nothing in the beginning ukraine without ukraine and if the time comes for negotiations in the world it will and should be zelensky's decision to do so on his terms. he is all the president of ukraine, a sovereign country of a sovereign state, despite how much he would not like to admit it. this is a sovereign independent nation and president zelensky has the right to speak for his people and determine when and if he is ready to come to the negotiating table with putin to end this war. he defines what success looks like determines what victory looks like and he determines

what conditions for negotiations can be, but i deliberately added expression here, because the very speech that is built there, but it's like this, well, an institution, cancer for a stone. yes, everyone should believe the sovereignty of all this speech was only for one thing, so that everyone would believe. what kind of sovereign sovereign zelensky is he even, if anything, kirby sends to hell. that's how sovereign he is, that's what you understand, son, that's all that you discussed. here it is, i don't believe it. rather, wait. it's not that no one believes him. everyone knows back everyone knows back. maybe only in ukraine he believes that you have an alliance with the americans in ukraine, maybe only in ukraine he believes in this, but this is not zelensky zelensky feeling the collars of the leash. he doesn't consider himself an ally. that's for sure. be kind. well, yes, as a beginner, they provided me with words.

eh, well, in general, yes indeed the world has entered. e has long been in the era of turbulence. you are absolutely correct. it kind of reminds me of this divorce, that is, such a situation began in the family, it was escalated, escalated. uh, now we've moved on to bq utensils straight to the real and at that moment, just when the decision is made what to do next, uh , calmness comes. what happened to vladimir vladimirovich, why is he sure? i mean , uh, now, okay? how to act, that is, yes, we had certain problems in our country. these problems are being addressed. it is clear the direction for these actions to the question. er, that's why he becomes calm. that is, he drew some real line. and as for the subjectivity of objectivity, but we understand what we will say during a divorce. so the wife is the subject of the mother-in-law, the subject of the girlfriend. this is the object of the mother-in-law, the good one is the subject. that is kiwi can be negotiated. eh, accordingly, as a result of this, a definite system is being built. why were a in the majority? the fact that brix representatives are now uh,

the main subject for russia uh, why weren't europeans present there? either there were few of them or representatives of the so-called west well, because most of them it is already becoming. e the object of politics, that is, they are not subjective in most of their decisions, because they do not respect, roughly speaking, interests. eh, their own countries. well , the global reason is very simple, that is, the debt economy. and she, well, i'm not an economist of such a high level, but they taught me something. uh, the debt economy is really heading into a global impasse. it is already easy to see, and the only way out of this impasse is from somewhere, but to get an influx. it 's a robbery, as it always has been, it always will be, so war is the only way out. now for e. this debt economy or the destruction of the entire structure of reformatting it in a new way. e, an important point was touched on, which was definitely one of the main directions on the forum here on e, this discussion was asked by a quote from

aleksandrovich zhirinoviev. i would like us to look at it, yes this quote is short, but it is of fundamental importance for you to start discussing now. here i would like to recall another russian philosopher alexander alexandrovich zinoviev, whose centenary is, uh, centenary of his birth, whom we will celebrate just the other day on october 29, even more than 20 years ago. he said that for the survival of western civilization at the level reached by it, it is necessary, because the whole planet is necessary as an environment for existence, all the resources of mankind are necessary, and not claimed as it is. everything is just like that. and in this system. the west initially laid itself a huge head start, as he himself developed its principles and mechanisms. as now these very principles, which are constantly repeated

and hmm, which are an incomprehensible black hole, what is it? nobody knows. that's interesting, yes, and here i'll show more. let's do it this way, that was the topic with these very principles, the mechanisms that are laid down, first of all, it is currencies on the dollar system. yes and that's what the president discussed, what's in perspective. we strive to have a platform that does not depend on any country, which could carry out monetary transactions and provides all world trade uh, world trade all world trade. at the same time, no one could use this platform for power or political purposes, and russia will achieve this desired future. but it’s interesting, this will happen quickly and statements are already taking place here. austin, in general, everyone reacted to valdai, so, no matter what they say in america, it is discussed, south korea is us.

well, they have a morning. earlier, in the morning, right south korea came out and said, yes, no, no, no, we didn’t even think, in general, we didn’t think anything anywhere supply. it is through poland that it goes to ukraine for korean weapons through poland, contracts for poland, and then the president said this, but only further, you understand, yes, these contracts are connected, because there are, well, delivery rules. and then moving across the border only with the permission of the first supplier. yes, and the interception, of course, is there, well, of course, yes, that's why it's all here. uh, well, the warning was that we don't have much faith in your contractual obligations. we consider the supply to poland as participation in the ukrainian issue in releasing south korea which if he wants, then he does it, otherwise we can er, well, begin to empathize with the north korean people, sympathize with him very much. it's such a good healthy way of talking. but i'm

distracted. everyone is looking at it. and austin, uh, so calming america said that everything would be fine with them and connected. by the way, with the doctrine that they have adopted now of national security. here, if he commented on it like that. magical china russia cannot systematically challenge the united states for long periods of time. however, the russian aggression poses a directly acute threat to our interests and values. it’s important by the method about a long stretch, because i’m remembering the meeting place, you can’t change the meeting place, dad, i’ve decided to see. but when discussing the economic crisis, the possible collapse of the dollar and the fact that the strange majority will strive to get rid of the dollar system and eliminate it. here, especially in this situation, we can talk about long-term american plans. this is what will happen in the long run. well, let's

let's see what will be more interesting in the long run, we have a discussion going on. and that means interesting thoughts. i now wanted to return to the philosophical categorical view. and so vladimir putin why is it important? carefully delve into this philosophical reasoning of putin, because it is precisely such philosophical worldviews that reveal the plan of the state, and from the plan comes the concept of strategy, tactics, and so on. i have never been an international european leader. right now i can't afford to dream of modern that someone will come out and say such a philosophical worldview, such a view will open, which means there are maps of how some should have developed, which means contradictions and so on, but the intellect is zero there, in general, you just know, it’s not a meander. open the skulls there, take away the little addon there, you know, therefore, you know this absolutely,

intellectual superiority. the leader of russia over the rest of the leaders of intellectual superiority. have now been indicated. why, right here it was already said left turn, there and so further. yes national bolsheviks. the world is starting to take over, because there are left-wing liberals, trotskyists. there are left conservatives. these are national bolsheviks-stalinists. and now we see that these stalinists are beginning to throw themselves know. no, not necessarily. yes, because those countries that challenge the americans are all countries that want to protect their sovereignty. this is nasy. these are pains for us, because they challenge the ideology of the worldview and this global expansion of them. look, brix has entered there. as expected, it means the iranians, and argentina dreamed, so that the arabs should also go there, because the shields

are persian. so there must be a sunni and a happy saudi arabian candidate. this means that the entire arab east is connected, so, uh, brix, or can you imagine what kind of picture is obtained, but the americans remain? these are their energy satellites, unless, of course, they are the saudis , which means they went against the americans, which means oil production, which means they cut it the most, there and so on. that is, it is said that this east, that is, not western civilization. this it is very important that the western does not begin to rally around a single leader, because they have concerns about the chinese. here is a chinese, like the leader back and forth the economy first, but afraid of the chinese. you see, their numbers are afraid of them, this is tough discipline. this han should lead it, should manage, there and so on, but they have the experience of the historical experience of the soviet union , you don’t understand russian superiority. you

can work with russians, russians will build here, russians will help us develop americans, on the contrary, they will only rock together to limit them. their development must be limited so that they do not suddenly break through somewhere. but you understand, therefore, this speech by putin says that everything, the dice are cast, the bets are made by no left. there will be no right-wing reeling back and forth, which means that the goal is clear, as he says, you know, he is moving towards this goal, which means that the quote was given with decisive thinking. i, vladimir vladimirovich , said that he does not imagine himself in the role of khrushchev. and why is it here? why is khrushchev’s about the goals and objectives, it’s necessary to explicitly say this, you can train ears quite one word one. yes , it’s simple, well, otherwise what raik was talking about, there is another phrase of the classic vladimir ilyich step forward two steps back. it's important that therefore the models do not

go, you understand what's the matter, here. because it's all unknown. i'm the classic. i have vladimir ilyich, i would say you are cool classic vladimir ilyich only three exactly always did that. well, yes, you understand, well, if you look at practice, lenin's political practice, revolutionary international, when he had already become head of the soviet state. he always exactly, and did so. well, one way or the other way around, two forward one back. yes, well, it happened this way and that, because to talk about how vladimir ilyich knew how to maneuver - you know. this is an example. in general, well, just a sample of the world revolution before the brest-litovsk war of the world. well, that is, it is a distance of enormous proportions. the most important thing is not to say 10 steps forward, and then i take steps back quietly on my fingers. if there is a program, she will finish it. i am in the first part in many respects with estimates. maxima agreed. well, i can’t

agree with him all the time, so when i want to disagree in terms of what he said, he even wrote down that it was some kind of anti-western manifesto, but i, as a real representative, reacted. i, by the way, uh, well, as a real politician who was in the left political party. i have read a lot of anti-western manifestos. this has nothing to do with the anti-western manifesto, moreover, putin openly announced the openness of readiness. uh, and he was probably more of a signal that that all the problems that have arisen in russia by the west - this is not a problem that russia has created , this is a problem that the west has created and there is a way out of this situation, he does not close the door. he actually did not express insulting addresses. whoever it was, well, there were some jokes, but they are not not as critical as it happened in the west about the supply of weapons direct and not washed, you understand? what is the difference between the professor, when a country directly supplies weapons to ukraine, this is a

political decision, that is, they directly. leaves this open political decision, but proceed and challenge. yes, you can say that, and if all this happens through the third fifth countries, yes, then these countries actually, well, understanding, probably, certain challenges and threats. well, for themselves , they make such a decision under pressure. i 'm sure of it and the last according to the kirpiya. you know, i want to tell you, in fact, if zelensky and his team were even a little smart people, they would understand that what kirby said is actually a device for them. here, i tell you responsibly, this is a sentence for them. why because, when the united states of america decides everything and is not responsible for anything. here is a story about it. he says we no, listen, there is a sovereign state. there is a president there. there is a government there. there is a parliament there, the more they implement it. they decide everything themselves, we are here, we wash our hands, we have

nothing to do with it at all. i remember you zelensky who was there all the time. he tried to somehow appeal and expressed dissatisfaction. he, too, probably apparently understands this and a possible defeat. he, too, would like to at least share with those who took part in this, but he does not get the derby in plain text, he says, man. you are there, the president, you decided everything and be healthy, only you and no one and no one else will answer. it’s still curious that they reflect the will of the people. zelensky, his gang reflects the will of the ukrainian people, so he thinks that they remembered. we are now in this here, uh, dialogue about the caribbean crisis. and khrushchev is very curious. i advise our viewers to watch because fyodor lukyanov well, he normally asked a question. now, if you were during the caribbean crisis, how would you behave? then fedya thought, and in whose place? well, probably, after all, khrushchev’s soviet union was kenadite, and the american was killed a year later. well, it would certainly be

convenient for putin to put kennedy in his place before him. and why did putin react like that? i think he associates khrushchev in the first place in the fifty- fourth year with the transfer of the crimea, and therefore there was immediately such a thing. no-no-no, just not khrushchev in general, it would be quite funny if fedor said the soviet leadership was collective, well, putin probably reacted differently, but well , i don’t know if it’s right with crimea, although crimea is also a crisis phenomenon, but i think that this is still related to the understanding that in general, in fact, the dismantling of, e, the load-bearing structures of the soviet project , began just to fasten. i'm not talking about rehab right now, i won't talk. i am now talking about what began to happen with the economic system of the father in narkhozes to the admins. uh, mts from that corn will save us and finish us. e.e. well, you understand perfectly well that the gagarin program is absolutely stalinist yes, well, it just moved

, moved along the energy, so we still went so far as to rehabilitate stalin like this, like, here you are maxim maxim maxim here you are. eh, you understand, you are then offended by me, but you use the words completely inaccurately, i am not engaged in anyone's condemnation and anyone 's rehabilitation. you just sewed it on here that a circle of stalinists, led by me, has gathered here with the chairman of the circle that deals with rehabilitation. i'm all just spectators, then they checked what i said, yes, yes, so, i say again, the space program and the king and the whole line, starting from the circle of the rocket study of rocket jet propulsion, but began long before nikita sergeevich became the head of the soviet state and the solution of the issue of delivery of nuclear weapons. the use of ballistic intercontinental missiles began long before

nikita sergeevich became the head of state. that's what i said, maxim well, for some reason you thought that this is some kind of rehabilitation, and next time think that this is something of a condemnation. i do not do one or the second with us advertising immediately after that you will continue. of course, the premiere on the russia channel, go to the temporary command of the captain. i thought you and sveta were looking for me in this sense, that for some reason it could be right away, the artist continues to watch on monday at 20:20 three krizan helps to treat acute respiratory viral infections

, strengthen immunity and restore strength trekrezan. be healthy for a cheerful morning or excellent dinner. create a cozy atmosphere with smart technology up to 60%. i like that it is possible to control the teplek from the phone. the teplek has a high efficiency , does not burn out oxygen and is absolutely fireproof. only now the teplak heater at a special price thanks to me people's life appears both weekends and working days. i will help you prepare for your interview. even if you go to him for the first time at work, he will not only see your bright future, but also help you find yourself in it. in search of work, a person needs a person from the employment center work in russia your work our work is a stressful situation. i recommend magnesium power magnesium hill of this lar - it's better absorption and convenient. taking only two tablets a day instead of the usual six, magnesium filatyvalar, better than magnesium in stressful situations, coffee that was always with you helped to get through the

morning traffic jams made, good morning. monday was an excuse for a better date freshly ground fresh, brewed natural. the very favorite coffee in delicious and daughter symphony air fresheners capture and block molecules unpleasant smell. they just mask them. this is how fresh care sounds from pyaterochka discounts for you pasta, it helps to accelerate the elimination of inflammation and support pulmonary immunity. innovations from coughing in the 21st century.

liv 52 cleanses, regenerates and protects the liver. liv 52 is an expert in liver cleansing and restoration banks and loans all online. i have three housing lottery approvals guaranteed to win an apartment for 30 million. buy a ticket anything can come true will open the door to your dream. more and more tasks need to be solved, and energy is running out mildronate the activator of my ability to work and mental activity mildronate i can do it download the m.video application after receiving 500 bonus rubles and buy superman goods, for example, a vk smart speaker for 499 rubles. m.video for the fulfillment of all

our wishes for cinema on weekends, that i can love such happiness so much. i don't understand what kind of real relationship we have with you. and why then all this wedding? playing in love with lena it's profitable for us. premiere tomorrow at 21:00

heart of parma did not become an actress valentina a year ago malyavinoy her life was full of incredible events and mystery. even her death became a mystery to everyone . she is cremated. she has dizzying novels, a loud, nationwide love video, but a tragedy happened, a mystery that has not yet been unraveled. i have redeemed. i think all my troubles like no one else today for the first time. what happened to valentina malyavin in malach prison today at 16:30 on the channel, russia who is against the program on russia 1 channel, we continue our discussion. we have

touched on an important point and, by the way, it continues in our discussions and debates here throughout the special military operation. well, i 'll repeat it again. here is the entry. yes, the west provoked , sought to make the adoption of such a decision inevitable for us. and well, what's next? now already? the west has a big question. they do not understand. they don’t want to achieve anything, by the way, they are discussing it, this is already in plain text. yes, uh, half a crab-robers wrote. e about this article and such articles more and more washington post. after putin's speech yesterday reviewer asks. can someone in america explain to me what our goals are? well, the silence hangs very figuratively, hungarian prime minister viktor orban put it, almost in the style of zhvanetsky . look. we came up with a plan to dig a hole for the russians

to fall into, but then we fell into it ourselves and now we have to decide. what to do is, says keep digging. it doesn't seem very reasonable. well, very accurately and, uh, corresponds to the moment of this entire stage in general, because they were preparing a trap for russia and fell into it themselves, this is not only what i tell him, they planted it with cacti. and if we talk about the bombal, but i hope that he, uh, himself , we still do not belong to this collective western, after all, one of the few reasonable politicians. and if we continue the theme of europe, then indeed we are witnessing such a collective insanity and the beginning of a fight of all against all, because, uh, we didn’t have time to quarrel, and macron and schultz, following the results of the meeting in paris, after all. in the first, comrade cc flies to congratulate, and for a long time after leaving for merkel, the macron tried on yourself the laurels of the idea. first of all, and the economic leader of the european union and here pokerfit scholz

outstripped him. uh, plus e scholz completely caved in under the demand of the americans in security policy and the supply of weapons, but completely ignored the ideas of the franco-german tandem, including in the vc e, for which joint and projects were developed in the aircraft industry there for armored vehicles, when germany is now, having put as many as four shells, killers according to steinmeier, and as many as three systems. i have a purchase and they still supply mars. eh, so here too germany decides to buy american air defense systems, rubs, american f-35s. and where is the franco -german economic cooperation on what the merkasi has been talking about for so long or even had such a term, this is an indestructible union, uh, only not workers and christians, but merkel and sarcosia, respectively, europe and now america and before the macron and there merkel herself itself and reaches the shels what it turns out to be. the united states is waging an economic war against the european union by lowering e,

lowering rates, making it more attractive to manufacture the same electric vehicles in the states accordingly, a part of european firms will quietly think that they have fled overseas. as did the first settlers back in the 17-18th century and, accordingly. eh, it turns out that europe is already starting to shake, and indeed. so she fell into this hole, which she dug for herself, economic and political, and where should she dig? eh, you can really bury yourself deeper or immediately, therefore, really here the situation looks like a circus, but such a circus, from which it’s not only not funny, but even already becomes somehow skillfully and sadly and the last remarque literally. eh, concerning. here is the arak, he said, as regards and what exactly the european league are reeds. but really everything was mixed up, if in the thirties everyone was accused to the right of a spreading clone, now the europeans. this is already some kind of left branch bias, that's all. horror, horror, interestingly interesting, how are the shults of crowns.

if it was dimming, around, yes, well, macron is going to draw some kind of goat, uh, to the united states. i read this from the western press today. well, that's so funny. i can imagine how these two powerful figures come out and say, you hear trump behind the market. you see, this is not trump babayta funny clause. yes, this is exactly what it looks like. come on what does it look like? let them first, if they can negotiate for the $200 billion that the shell is trying to, with which the shell is trying to save the industry. it is, uh, the industry of germany and this will satisfy the macron, then maybe something will turn out for the macron. actually. eh, they can't do anything . they both went and will go on slaughter for slaughter, surprising absolutely everyone and, of course, surprising. in the previous program, it would have been

why, putin, apparently, without respect, and did not say, but how can he respect people who, in fact, give up their countries to the slaughter in the same way as he already says to the slaughter about ukraine therefore, he did not speak about ukraine. because he knew perfectly well that ukraine had already been hired by the west by the united states, as a collective landfner, who must complete two tasks , at least a task, and try to finish it. this is up to some negotiations. and the maximum task is to try to organize some kind of nuclear provocation, in order to again tie up both europe and russia in this place and free america for the fight. well, with china or with whom they still want to fight there, of course, these countries cannot evoke respect for e, and putin speaks as a person whom, of course, he probably offended. e statement to the ccp because there are two countries china and america he wanted to explain to

whom who why in odessa roofing material. so he did everything right. i did not understand about the ruberoid. well okay, uh i just know about the escalation. in general , i think that, of course, we are very competent, very precise, the president said about this, that this was on his instructions. uh, minister of defense shoigu called everyone, because it is very accurate at this time in this moment. and i think that a monstrous provocation of the real has been prevented, because they were betting on it. this is the path to the next level of escalation, where they considered. i think the americans that they can reset the entire previous history and raise everything to a new level and try to involve everyone else. well against, of course, perishing applications. yes, i don’t know six ministers and nuclear and plesetsk, yes, but i stopped it sobering. yes, this is very important, because this is the teaching. here you know what a question is. if it comes to application, then why

did you fools think that we will use it against ukraine or europe. how would you like? it is neither ukraine nor europe that is our goal. that's who is guess with three times. because, well, that's the only thing that should be conveyed to these overseas people. here, maxim, you are exactly like that love. hey, i made this especially for you. yes, prepared the plot. that's because it just resonates with the fact that the president of russia yesterday rejected the world about european awareness . i was discussing all this, and here, right in the morning, i open the internet. and here is the confirmation uh, meet the prime minister of spain i think that spain is a potential ally in many areas where we can work together with senegal to face the common challenges our society faces. i'm proud to be

i am one of the first international leaders to visit you in my capacity as president of senegal and look forward to working with you. ouch. oh, kenny. sorry keeney looking forward to working with you. well, i was waiting for a catch when the quote was that i was one of the first who let the president of senegal into the president of senegal a long time ago. i think about now the president will answer him. it turns out he confused senegal with kenya. well, what can i say? the only thing that maybe justifies spain a little bit is that it has a colonial empire was in other places. if they had confused bolivia with ecuador, it would be a shame, and in spain they have only equatorial guinea in africa, their colony was also western sahara. everything is possible french french genius. i don't know

what exactly, yes, but the time of the white man. still, you can’t get anywhere, it remains not surprised by such a mistake, because, well, since the us sixth fleet went to the coast of belarus, everything has become for me. and our intention to capture, voronezh yes, as if it became everything is clear, but uh, here, i would like a little back, uh, to return to the discussion about this collective west that puts itself in the pit. if you take this uh, this collective west to divide, there is europe and there is uh, the usa plus canada plus australia there, then all the same, uh, europe, the usa, together with the canadian province of alberta, sits in a hole in the gulf of mexico at one time. they will be fine. they will come out of this energy crisis , and now we will resist the fact that this slot is a macron. ah, the united states. let's give benefits to european companies, if you poach,

america will not give you cheap resources and benefits. what can europe offer anything? what is this perversion for? we see what dollar economies said here. you will continue now. i briefly understand, well, uh hmm in literature and in general in legends they say that when they fled, well, criminals fled, skatorgs or uh, and exiles, they took someone with them as food. here is europe during this escape. well, uh western yes it's fodder for criminals in the form of the united states this is what they eat. well, this does not mean that when they are sitting in europe, here in america there will still be an opportunity to run to this very freedom. yes , i don’t know what i want, they have everything ahead, but this is the food they are sitting on the way. it 's absolutely perfect. that's it. to do this, they redirect. uh, industrial potential. e to

your home, that is, so that the dollar is not only an empty piece of paper, but also backed up by real industry. the production that they will increase in this in america. here's a look at the next few years, how would see something situation intent. yes, but the idea - it's great. if they had started to implement it 10 years ago, they might even have had a chance. trump started up, but trump already wanted to do just that. it was coming from a different position. he was bringing american business home, and they are taking someone else's. they don't do it in parallel. yes, what does it mean that a stranger was german became american, but now, well, for sure in america it will not be german. you see, if you move, you will be ours. i want to thank for the orders for the words that he said, we wanted to well, digging for russia most got there. i am ready before this at the meeting of the box not to put koopa, because i warned i was ready. i don't know i started my soul. i warned in

my 2007 article, who's coming? do not dig holes in russia, you yourself will get there. you didn't hear me, but you hit me. now i want to say a couple of words to the zinoviev, you know, that's what your words of zinoviev alexander are because he lived in the west, as if a dissident and returned from there as an absolutely anti-reserve and absolutely sophile. and he is what he saw there and described in his books something hostile not to the soviet communist system, but hostile to the russian world. and so what he said was everything he said to national security strategy. the united states everything is indicated, as the woman said, we need all the oil in the oil. i now want to go further along the path of the organ and answer the organ to europe. what will happen to them if they continue to dig? here are the rusyns torn off. yes, i just want. i have been looking for

this information for a long time. i just want to say it publicly about it, and external financing of ukraine this year external financing of ukraine for 8 current months until october 26 from february 24, 2002 , and receipts to the budget of ukraine amounted to 23 billion 100 million dollars. this is 60% of all funds that go to the budget of ukraine, but ukraine's sovereign minimum. independently , ukraine's external financing for 23 years is at least $3.5 billion per month. in this case, the most difficult period will be. naturally. first months. here is december, january, the most-most. e ice cream and we need gas we need three and eight tenths of a billion dollars a month ukraine in december. january february should give someone 3.8 billion dollars. this is not the most important thing, the most important thing is that this amount is needed without taking into account the 17 billion

dollars that are needed for an emergency economic recovery. this is hello to the european union of germany and von der lainen. with sur biden and the entire western world, this is definitely not the case. i'm kidding. i just said conditionally, she, of course, is the most serious leader of europe anywhere, there are macron scholts , it doesn’t decide anything at all. i'm just saying a big hello to you, dear western partners. and if you don’t give ukraine this money, will you definitely end up where you were told? he's gone blackmail, and i'm a big hello, pass after your speech. uh, comrade pike, who claimed that president zelensky independence ukraine is sovereign does not depend on anyone absolutely exactly absolutely you need to understand exactly that ukraine takes 3.8 ml. in a month and another 17 plus in a year

, independence definitely preserves sovereignty and can send everyone far away, as zhvanetsky said, flying over cherepovets. well, it just flies by. she is in this case, probably over brussels, if you contact them today, we have everything right now, watch the whiskey program and see you. my name is mary hello. with a great work, the reaction of foreign countries to vladimir putin's valdai speech is breathtaking.