it is said that the cosmos should be used for peaceful purposes. yes, we are talking about a response to aggressive actions against military actions against the russian army. as for the answer, i emphasize that we point out just the violation of all possible and possible agreements. and, by the way, article six of this treaty clearly indicates that the state is responsible for the activities, including non -state organizations in the space of their countries, that is, in this regard, kirby cannot throw off the state on someone for the actions of satellites, including the mask or anyone . and now about the grain deal. well , you know, of course, it’s just amazing the reaction of ukraine to suddenly ask, you can return the floor to vladislav for a second, because, in a half-breath, they told me that there is a given that yes, our ministry of defense definitely officially announced that one of the naval drones was launched from one of the ships. which what is called worked as part of the

implementation of the grain deal, it is quite possible, i think that from the very first minute when all this information went. well, at least the expert community and i had a common idea that, most likely, they were all launched from these ships, but as it turned out, part of the odessa coastline, but nevertheless, the ships that go from there, so to speak, grain still, it turns out they can tolerate something. and back, as we know, they go loaded with about 20% of ammunition, because this is the shortest and most convenient way. let us recall the role of this deal, so to speak, in organizing a sabotage act against the crimean bridge. that is, how did the weapons get from the port of odessa, as our special services said to the port of romania, that is, it’s also a big question, but why am i amazed at the reaction of ukraine, zelensky’s press secretary nikiforov says? yes, we are not part of the deal. it's there, something he turkey and russia signed. let them figure it out. listen. as far as i remember the video message of zelensky who

beat him in the chest. this is us, this is our deal, this is personal. i signed zelensky. look, we are saving the world from hunger. yes it turns out already everything, it turns out. all in understand this further. we do not participate in this deal at all, i emphasize the press secretary of the president of ukraine zelensky but of course, and in this regard , it is simply amazing how zelensky and his entire team started. eh, disaster. e screaming means your poor e, bangladeshi. in bangladesh, the inhabitants of bangladesh so they are malnourished now so because of russia there will be no fodder corn, or something, it doesn’t even matter what they bring there, after all, in bangladesh in africa, fodder corn would not be refused, but there really it's scary in africa right now go. but we are ready to substitute this for free, but notice right there the same kuleba, the minister of foreign affairs declares that russia is offering 500,000 tons of

grain stolen from ukraine for free in no case should it be allowed. so wait, so you're worried about whether this grain will go to bangladesh or not, it turns out it's not, it can't be delivered. well, and the last, of course, uh, incidental underwear, the statement of the ministry of defense of the russian federation that uh, a specific unit participated in the explosions of the northern streams british navy that is, you know, well, really this is a pretext for hostilities under notice how immediately this statement appeared in the british press immediately. let's get angry screaming. see what russia can attack in all articles, there are a lot of cards, where, maybe, uh, admiral rodakin. uh, the chief of staff of the british armed forces has already repeated several times that any attack on the infrastructure of the uk's great underwater infrastructure will mean, and to the wars that britain has already done against us by britain. can this be done

against russian infrastructure under water, or anywhere? in this regard, by the way, in my opinion, the parade calls our ambassador evil, i draw your attention, i draw your attention, i read it with interest. now with a report one again years ago. uh, very interesting policy structure. the exchange is one of the largest think tanks in the uk, very large, very solid. uh, so he issued a report about underwater sabotage. underwater about how vulnerable britain is , uh, the exchange policy is one of the most large and at the same time not with unknown sponsors the most closed. well, judging by indirect signs, the oil and gas giants sponsor him, and so on, on the author of the report. pay attention, yes, a little-known then completely politician decided to write a picture. here is this report for this closed underline, what is it called biden, rashadak, rashid sunuk or so on? well,

why the fact that someone who is? but the british prime minister is the current court. i have read a very profound report. he really learned how uh could damage the uk just kastrophically in fact, including financial damage. uh, there's trillions of dollars a day transactions under the submerged have been going through and so on. i, uh, draw the attention of our relevant services to this report , suna knows everything is fine, that is. everything is detailed there, it is described, you suspect that ukrainian submariners can carry out such operations against britain. i don’t call for anything, mind you. i don't call. it's just that ukrainian submariners are so headless. i urge you to carefully study, and then you really wonder why you have masks for his companions, as we saw technical problems suddenly arise and why the high-like ukrainian submariners only interfere with

some kind of therapy for them. transformers, their brits have learned more. no. understand see when the high-like touches. uh, the uk is demanding to prove where enough hiley likes have put underwater equipment, to be honest, there is an interesting idea. here, an interesting thought was touched upon. here, as regards the growth of the orthodox community in the united states of america and in general in on the whole, it must be admitted that russia is for such a traditional in the good sense of the word healthy part of society, including in western countries , a certain beacon. i cannot rule out the possibility that, under a certain set of circumstances and some attention from moscow, there may appear, for example, the international brigade, a novel by mercader. it would be right. this is what

we don't need. this listen. we are in no way associated with this. it's just the course of history can push for a similar development of events and drew attention to the fact that, let's say, here is the infrastructure of the polish airfield, rzeszow is used to unload deadly weapons from which civilian russian people are killed, here in the southeast of ukraine, that is, not only the military personnel of the russian army, but peaceful russian people, citizens of russia, citizens of ukraine killed with this weapon. it seems to me that all those volunteers who are fighting for peace on the planet, they should pay attention to this, as for other aspects, then certainly. past the experience of our special services in relation to terrorist killers those who called for the destruction of our state. those who fought against him with illegal terrorist methods have the glorious methods of israel. for example, the creation of a special group of the

wrath of god. i would be in the place of those people who are engaged in such operations, or rather. so far , we see that, probably, they are not doing it, but should do it. if i were these people, i would study in detail one more point related to all these oddities, about which you, dear comrades. speak in the field of domestic politics russia, for example, the financing at the expense of gazprom of the national heritage of the russian people of a strange media called echo of moscow throughout its history of existence, which pursued an anti-state policy, an anti-russian policy. in the truest sense of the word, or let's say. eh, travel abroad, and later the withdrawal from the sanction of the criminal case ksenia anatolyevna sobchak well, many others will remain in general, this case is not understood. well, i mean, it was a shock. i you know what, well, listen to our

reality was like a lawyer, so i can’t unequivocally say without reading it. and let's say this. so, uh, as uh, an analyst politically yes , familiar with certain processes, including in your russian society, and i doubt very much that sobchak's subordinate could use the network of information resources formed for her in telegram channels without a viewer, and all the more so to play such games with such influential people as cheremez, but all these oddities seem to me to be a kind of manifestation of this zubatovshchina. remember yes, there was the head of the moscow security department zubats, who believed that it was important for the interests of state security to create pseudo-revolutionary organizations. so we probably have separate comrades. they think that for the interests of the security of the state, in order to control everything in society, you need to have your own kind of liberals. now offend to report. yes, after my daughters, well, who took and

called me a horse like this, trojan trojan yes. uh, understand why the danger with this zubatovshchina all the same ended in bloody, sunday, of course, 19. 2006, sooner or later. whatever they are, no matter how much they go to an appointment with the presidential administration and no matter how much caviar and vodka they eat together with certain responsible officials, they will still get out of control or do something , and that one, poison, which they spread in society, he poisons many young souls, now, working here with student youth. i know about it, so of course, uh, if we set ourselves the goal of victory on the frontets. primarily. victory must be in the rear. within ourselves, everything must be subordinated to the goals of the victory, er, our belarusian experience. although, of course , our political crisis of 2020 and our own in terms of the scale of the tragedy, it is incorrect to compare our

belarusian one. experience has shown that as soon as they finished wagging various kinds, as soon as they took it hard to restore order, when a step to the left a step to the right was a deviation from the state course. immediately follows the legal underlining of the criminal law and repression. we have stabilized the situation. this is very important here. it seems to me that we need to do the same, but there is a discrediting article, the russian army, there are legal mechanisms. why don't you apply? here, i listened to you, dear friends. it seems that russia is a victim, probably. in a sense, they unleashed aggression against us, but let's still know that from the point of view of military affairs, permanent defense is the best way to lose. let's move on. like this. here. let's at least go on the attack when there are human physical resources for this. let's at least put things in order in the rear . this is simply not acceptable. by the way, excuse me, but what is a foreign agent in peacetime? did it still make any sense?

and now it's a traitor, of course, so let's not play our tigers foreign agent foreign maiden with us, if this is treason strange agent here the keyword agent agent is a stranger do not need an agent, intelligence should be stopped walls, no ambassador should be from london revoke. get ready for the norm. in my opinion about the deprivation of citizenship test in london are alive to send a london diploma. no, no, no , that's not what mr. kilin once said, well, there's no need to be afraid. well , i could be wrong, i think it was like, well , london will definitely not be nuked while i'm here. well, yes, i understand, the apparatus is calling the ambassador from london but if england declared war on us in fact, yes, they declared war on us, how to relate to the fact that they, and so on our gas pipelines.

sorry, here's an attempt. sevastopol too, if will be accepted fundamentally behind this are the destruction of, let's say, a satellite constellation formally, not related to the american state. they won't do anything. yes, even if i make it tougher, we will demonstrate strength, we will be respected, we will try to hope that we are wearing white gloves. we will come to an agreement with our western partners , never all agreements are violated, and only those agreements that were concluded from a position of strength. they observed. yes, as long as you have the opportunity to violate them completely, they comply with the agreements, or so far beneficial to them at all do not care. uh, all agreements with them are not worth the paper that ink, or should be afraid to violate powers of attorney. i see you somehow don’t like everything, absolutely don’t like everything. first of all, my voice dropped. you see, and we

speak the truth and we never have a voice. i like it, m-m. you see, i asked one of my acquaintances and she is so immersed in the internal situation of russia of one acquaintance of a muscovite and how does he feel about that, and how does he think what a foreign agent is? it's just an enemy of the people. well, you lived, well, in soviet times. you know how you read. i say, is a foreign agent really an enemy of the people , we treat him like this in society as an enemy of the people, if he takes money from a foreign state for activities directed against the russian federation, i’m all such a friend, yes, i don’t suffer. i write. wait wait marked. all i hmm thought he was wrong. i think he didn't take it okay, well, here's your discussion today, well, listen, well, what do you want from russian society sticky? what for? this is true? come line up. here is

russian society. as you say, while the victory is not at the front. let's set the course of action. you want, you stand from the darling. well, yes, and how do you really want to say this. they lie, they lie for foreign money. we want to line up absolutely gay from weeds in no single width. eh, i don't have. there is a difference, just weed weeds will be decked. at the same time, you see how we caress the opportunity to leave, as far as i am a citizen of ukraine i want to ask one question and it interests me today, the head of the foreign ministry of your minister of countries , lavrov, said that the russian leadership and in particular, including vladimir putin, are ready for negotiations on the 24th. he repeated again. we are always ready, clarifying questions. uh,

peskov's spokesman said that well, a clarifying question. is it possible to negotiate with the head of kiev, president zelensky peskov said that it is necessary to survive there ? i heard this for the first time he said that everything is the essence, but peskov said that it is better that it be optimal, that there be zelensky, someone else next to him as a patron, what did he say? peskov, he says that since zelensky himself is not subjective with him, but respectfully said, if i correctly understood the ban on negotiations, well , there is no ukraine, therefore we can only talk with the americans. well, he didn't say so. he said that it would be better if there was someone else who is not the essence, volodya.

is it possible to perceive this? i don't watch it, he has nothing to talk about at all. is it possible every time we we are talking to the macron, how the whole vladimir vladimirovich is now going down because someone is listening, why am i writing himself. i want to say that it is possible to stop now. maybe i misunderstood this signal. is it possible to stop now and not cross? so, either they didn’t read the counterattack in ukraine, don’t switch to the attack now, which is about to be or is already ready, no, it quickly suits society, because ukrainian society is also building up. yes, we are divided into ukrainian society well done for offering to kill all russians to eat. i'm now well, what offers kills russians to eat their own, who say that the word and who read it who is it? excuse me your bastards

said that the russian language must be destroyed, the russians must be a swamp. our task is to destroy russian culture and rewrite russian history. this is what everyone close to them says. again, one people turned over. let yes, i'm sick and your people are sick, so here we are, because we are one people. we have at least two features. first. we are equally stubborn. when we rest against that russian, that ukrainians, especially, especially you were there, both russians and russians. here is kherson yes, he is russian, and yesterday he was a ukrainian, but today he is ready to set up a flag in order to become russian again tomorrow or vice versa. why am i? well, it’s just that there are 150 million of us. and what time is it, that’s why both of us and the second, when there is a feeling that i must be wrong. i

have to prove that i'm wrong asks a person. what are you fighting for? what do you want? i because justice was ukrainians say that such justice. well let's see, wait an important question. well, what kind of justice kills donbass for 8 years? what is the justice of gay parades? what kind of justice destroys orthodoxy? what kind of justice will allow drugs in ukraine, what kind of justice will become a tool of satanists to serve nato and this is justice, look, it was already yesterday or the day before yesterday. i'm not talking about that, but give back, talk about the fact that tomorrow now for quality, wait, it might be worse it will be even worse, maybe worse, because the 1st of november will come. but if there's one more day in october, maybe stop it all stop. so stop stop wait you, i'm talking about what the head of the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian federation says, we are ready for this conversation. so here's who you're ready with. he didn't

say dmitry sergeevich peskov told you , as always, you misquoted him. in what place did you listen to him , it’s possible for zelensky to reach some agreements, based on the experience of march, but i’m nothing to you. not worth it because at the behest of outside they can be canceled instantly, the decisive voice for washington is the last phrase. anything to clarify it okay , so, where did you see. sincerely, vladimir aleksandrovich president of ukraine yes? eh, at least you understand, fucking, trying, uh, all the time. i say my thoughts, they refer to peskov , you know. here, let's go like this. here. we do n't go to school. we are analysts, we are trying and i 'm trying to say in particular that if there is a chance to stop, you say stop. and i ask

question minister. he said that we are ready to transfer negotiations. look, it's not a problem to stop , it's very simple. zelensky is withdrawing all his troops from russian territories. will be completely high with the kherson zaporizhzhya soviet with the nikolaev luhansk donetsk, to begin with, assumes obligations that its countries will never join nato, undertakes the obligation to reduce its army to a certain level. and of course, it prohibits all nationalist organizations. now listen sir head of the guru of ukraine and why are these terrorists, what will i listen to, because this is a vile bastard who tried to kill me, who, fulfilling the order of zelensky, tried to organize the murder of me, margaret simonyan

dmitry konstantinovich kiselev of my colleagues. excuse zhenya popova olechka skabeeva. this bastard tried to do it. this bastard is personally guilty of the murder of daria dugina. you want me to listen to this terrorist, bastard, i don’t understand. where are ours? excuse these ruts. i don't understand where our fees here so that i listen to this bastard. it's not just his personal plan about it. i don't care about the terrorists' plans. just when you say bend over, what putin said and we will find in the toilet we will wet. this should apply to ukrainian terrorists. he organized the explosion. on the crimean bridge, he and his colleagues were behind the assassination. zakharchenko, his colleagues became behind the murder of givi and motorola, and again, yes, i don’t care about his confession, the americans directly said that he even as the americans wrote today, that behind the attack on sevastopol ukraine wants degenerates to arrest someone, he says,

someone shoots, a miserable vile corrupt creature, a bunch of terrorists of scum and nazis, therefore, there will be a tribunal and at this tribunal all these bastards will answer everyone will answer everything, scoundrels from gordon arrestovich. let's not forget zelensky's budanovs. how many years it will take and he will say eight. no matter how much it takes, even if we even temporarily retreat somewhere, if there are some temporary defeats by posilevich, we will not remain until the end of the vermin. how many people put in and how many people shall we put in? how much is needed to defeat the nazi so much and put. you have cursed yourselves, you are the servants of satan. you have plunged the people of ukraine into this fornication. you brought him up in a

state of hatred for the donbass, hatred for everything russian. you are guilty of the death of children who did not notice did not want to see. for you, life before a few meant nothing, the life of the lugansk people meant nothing, you still have what to do, you allow civilian objects, you took hummers in order to accurately shoot at the elderly quarters of donbass and your american masters dispose of you like a pack of owl puppies, and you accept this great ukrainian people. all the greatness of ukraine was only a part of the russian empire, all the terrible pages of humiliation and shame, when they went into the service of satan. return to the path of truth i will say, i will see you tomorrow in a quiet calm voice.

i grew up on soviet cinema, i am a soviet film director , and there are few people like me left, 10-15 confessed to the well-known director kareshev nazarov, therefore, according to him, patriotism. it's not a genre. this is a state of mind, head of mosfilm folk artist, talented director, screenwriter, producer named koron shakhnazarov. in our country, everyone knows almost every one of his paintings became an event that caused discussion, and many of the films went to the golden fund of the russian i can’t understand whether you really are like that or pretend to be so indifferent. listen get rid of

me, you are so hard for me. why am i so hard on you? what are you? not progress, restored, or maybe, moscow state university erected heavily, you see, the club won’t hit him with a finger, but only karen kerch’s interests in cinema limited in his own words. in this, he was his father's front-line soldier, a brilliant lawyer, publicist georgiev shakhnazarov worked in the international department of the central executive committee of the party and stood at the origins of soviet political science. this picture of the white tiger became koranazarov's dedication to his father. the first of his serious works. about the great patriotic war. he is not here. he will wait 20 years, 50, maybe

100. and he will have to burn it. shakhnazarov's crown firms much of what passed through his heart in the film we are from jazz echoes of his youth. by the way, let's you mercedes rehearse picture american daughter. this is also about personal problems after parting with his second wife, his daughter. anna was taken by her mother to the united states and for almost 20 years the father was deprived of communication with his child. who is my dad mrs. bond is we the real dad russian nazarov knows not really often had to go to work on the other side of the ocean. he witnessed

how quickly the western world began to change and much of what the pencil is about. their nazarov spoke in recent years has become the picture of today in the world began to remove tchaikovsky dostoevsky removed from the floor of tolstoy take away the concerts of valeria herkel. today, more and more. we see karen shakhnazarov on the air of various political talk shows, contrary to the popular expression that when the guns speak, the muses are silent. why did he not remain silent, like some of the cultural figures, and why does he believe that today, more than ever, the fate of the country is connected with his own fate, the fate of a man, the fate of karen where to here, where is convenient for you, even there? you know, we

have already met in this studio more than once, but now we meet in some other world. true, after february 24th. we all live in a different world, and the most interesting thing is that someone else is aware of this world. someone is trying to look into his features. someone else lost the power of speech, never found it, and you already on february 24, when this operation in ukraine began, you already commented, and i watched this deep analysis of the feeling that as if you had a premonition of something like this we saw something that was leading up to this, or how i had a dream at night 24, it was a strange story, i just had a dream, that the operation has begun. i'm straight tv. i remember well in a dream i saw and, as it were, a message that

the russian troops began to lean against it there. well, in ukraine, i dreamed it all there. i still remember waking up. so you think something like that, and then in the morning you accidentally turn on the tv, and suddenly the news. so i don't know what it was. and, mind you. it was actually, as i later understand, a few hours before the start of the operation. this is such a mystical story. well, i speak like a wind. and there in this dream there was no information about well, how will it go, yes, when everything is over, when we win, that didn’t happen, that didn’t happen. well, maybe there is still to come, everything, maybe there will be some kind of catfish, i don’t know yet, it hasn’t happened yet. and you often have such dreams like this. well, what you are now telling is that the truth is something mystical. well, in general,

i have had such moments in my life, either a dream, or some kind of inner understanding. that's what it will have to be, and yes. it was like that. i don't want to put a fog on myself, but it's a fact that i've had it before. and, mind you. uh, regarding 24 february. i personally did not, not at all, not imagine that we would start such an operation. that is , of course, and at least i participated in the program, i knew everything about the whole situation around ukraine, but i’m just not with her that i assumed that he, probably, on the contrary, i thought that well, we won’t start the operation. but, and today you are already here after a while, when you have already got used to the fact that this is happening. how do you answer the question. why did this happen anyway? i experience a lot, of course. such a feeling, i would say bitterness, why because

that i am a soviet man. i grew up in the soviet union, formed in the soviet union, and now the thought does not leave me. here are three. kindred slavic peoples which, through extraordinary hardships and a sea of ​​blood, created a great country. then i think, these three slavic peoples took it and ruined everything. so i think, why did they do it from a great mind, but not only did they destroy this country. they still now, as they say, grappled in this bloody fight. and all this in fact , when you look at the whole background, you could solve some way, as they say, well enough i feel bitterness, because when

i see this, i understand that these three slavic peoples are just. as they say, but this is a great gift. to all the hurricanes of these slavic peoples. i don't understand how they can't understand that everything that 's happening today. this is a huge gift to their enemies. here are the enemies of these slavic peoples, and there are really a lot of their enemies. i understand, as they say, the position of russia and i understand, so to speak, the forced actions of russia, but i cannot understand after all, how in general, in general, for these, how did this clouding of reason occur throughout. here are the last 30 years there. this clouding of the mind by the condition of the east is just a clouding, you know, i hear a lot in recent

days that it did not start on february 24, but began back in the fourteenth year, began with the maidan now listen, once. i understand that what is happening to you, now it began, not even in the fourteenth year, but in the ninety-first. well, of course, of course, in the ninety-first, of course, it started even earlier, but this is this period such a final clouding of consciousness. he, of course, first of all, this is this thirtieth birthday. i am listening to you. and also dumbfounded by the fact, how did you start with this sign of yours and i'm trying to understand, but where are you from? well, in general, this is such a thing, as you like, you can have a flair for intuition. this is from the pope, after all, probably, and even, which you called him somewhere, georgy khacha, and the founder of political science in the ussr why well,

he really was the founder of political science in the ussr , he really was. uh, the founder, moreover, well, there is no need to say that he is alone, but he was one of basic. and, perhaps, the main one, by the way, because it was he who, by the way, held the first international congress of political science. well, i think it's not from my father. from my father, probably, but hmm political, right? i love political science, political analytics, politics, in general it's from my father. yes, i do a lot of it, but it's more from my mother, my mother. e very it seems to me a person who has certain. as they say, this is more feminine than something, they are masculine. i think what house you grew up in, i understand what books you could read from childhood. and why didn’t you follow in your father’s footsteps, but became more and more,

why even bets on the director. well, you could shoot such i on this political manifestos, for example, well, shit not because stanislav govorukhin did there, in my opinion, with russia which we lost or not, but no, we went to them in our own individual, uh way and and not political. in general, it was then that politics overtook you, after some time there. why is that? well , first of all, i have always been interested in politics. i am indeed as i have already said. in this sense, my father greatly influenced me, since i lived in a politician's family. well, i would not say that he is not a dad, but it’s impossible to call him a real politician, because dad did not make political decisions. he was the pinnacle of his career when he became gorbachev's aide, but gorbachev's aide does not make political decisions. as they say, he advises writing speeches and so on, therefore, therefore, one cannot

literally call him a politician. but he, of course, he was very well versed in politics. and we talked many times, then he read a lot of books. by virtue of his profession, he had access, and he brought home books that were not published in the soviet union , the so-called was a white series, you know, there were specially books in such white covers. there there were some very interesting books that we have e understandable. they were often all soviet, but for special purposes, as they say, a small edition was made but had access to them. i have them too was reading. i mean, i kind of grew up in that environment. and it's, well, to be honest, uh, i've never been tempted to work in politics. here's a job, because it's, uh, it's different, that as gorbachev's assistant well

, firstly, he, that is, he carried out his task in essence, if he could not stop the catastrophe, he could not influence well, all these terrible centrifugal forces the soviet union did not, well, of course, could not, firstly, one must understand that mikhail sergeevich had more than one assistant. there was a whole of this there were many helpers. and it is necessary to say, there was quite such a tough environment inside. gorbachev was a very tough struggle, internal. well, in the end, mikhail sergeevich himself made the decision, dad foresaw a catastrophe, the collapse of the country. you know, it seems to me that this is the feeling of some kind of catastrophe , and it has already been anticipated. many, and, of course, dad had a presentiment, but i must tell you that

still, the very moment of this, it was completely unexpected for everyone, absolutely it was, it was impossible to believe for no one. here are these belavezha agreements. it was just that even those who understood that some kind of catastrophe was going on could not imagine that this happened. this was why, by the way, then many thought , here is the cis will be old. but no, it turned out that it was n't. i think that really who understood what everything was leading to. it was yeltsin and his entourage. they deliberately went to this, because it was the only opportunity for them to seize power in the russian federation and thus to my sight. this is so, well, all the documents today spoke about this, by the way, today strangely enough, i would say. here's something else for me that's for today.

today, the real death of the ussr is taking place. right now it is happening. and as a tank, you know, i have a story in front of my eyes, the girls yulia were nurses from donetsk a few years ago, she went by train to mariupol and some men in camouflage grabbed her, in fact, they took a package on her head to some basement for a long, long time they beat , then raped one another third, and then dug a hole let her down to this pit there was practically no more instead of a face and a head there was one continuous bruise. and they said that now they will bury her alive. julia said, i will sign everything you say. it was the nazis, and they told her to sign some document that she had killed

one of their m-m ukrainian servicemen. she signed on was, a long investigation of different pre-trial detention centers in kiev in odessa in the end. yulia was exchanged for that same sentsov. remember the film director. when i think about what is happening in ukraine now i think, including about this yulia me i think we're here to put an end to this atrocity, but i want to ask you. and how did it happen? what is this beast in ukraine? fascist grew up, how is he there? who fed him? who fed him? i think you said right. we are all from the same family, one people, but i think it is also the result, of course, of the ninety-first year, the thing is that, as it seems to me, i have no doubt that nazism is present in ukraine. or rather, i would not call him nazism, yes, well,

of course, after the ninety-first year. here are these nationalism, by the way, is always dormant well, in a certain part. i'm not saying that all ukrainians, but they are the most passionate, they are the most active. and most importantly, they turned out to be absolutely uncontrollable, since the soviet government, of course, kept them, frankly. she didn’t allow them, so to speak, in general, she didn’t allow nationalism anywhere for the soviet union , any nationalism was taboo. and here it all came out and got uh, hmm like this. uh, as they say, the result and, in fact, they became to rule ukraine is therefore, of course, very dangerous. and in principle, of course, this is always hostile towards russia. definitely me, by the way, recently a couple of months ago one very close. uh, a ukrainian politician from ukraine

told me that people voted. zelensky but for his hero from the film servant of the people, a. well, you remember this picture, in fact, which became his campaign video. and you, in general, like this, if, in all honesty, do you really think that he is the president, that he has power about well, me it's hard to say he plays that role. you still feel it as a director, but i think you understand, i think that he, of course, is a project. in my opinion, and the project is a rather ingenious other question, that when the ukrainian voter says, we thought there it is, i can say it, guys. well, you think, so you have that, in principle, he led ukraine to collapse, in general, it’s terrible now to total, in general, the results of his activities are terrible. but therefore, i think that zelensky, of course,

is not an independent figure for me unambiguously. but i think that one should not underestimate him, and here is today's video. you see, he is precisely because he is an actor. and what for an actor for an actor, the main thing is a good role. and now zelensky got this role today, because, as they say, this is his stage, the whole world. you can imagine what it's like for actors. and who gives the command to the engine, right? this is very important, including for us it is clear who i am, for me there is no doubt that this is absolutely a project of the american script written by them. well, he still pronounces the lyrics. you know, texts you can also pronounce it in different ways. shakespeare wrote othello, one plays like this, and the other plays differently. so i mean with him

the responsibility. it doesn't take off. what is the purpose of the script. here is the gun at the end of the play, which should shoot what they are as a result of this whole production, and in the lead role of vladimir zelensky what these directors wanted as a result, it is clear that now their plans are violated, the script went a different way. and what do you think, carefully final, as they say, destruction soviet union in the face of ukraine, belarus, russia and ukrainians do not understand many of this until now? with the help of zelensky, by the way, who actually, whatever the project, he had a chance to prevent, he had this chance. really do the minsky when i look at everything that's going on. i think, lord, what is the minsk agreement compared to such horrific events, but this