i have already testified more than once, including in court , i am afraid that i cannot add anything new. tell me, was it dark outside, dark is putting it mildly , there was nothing at all. it can be seen, only the stop and the silhouettes of people, and you were approaching the stop. which side? in what sense? well , you had to cross the road to get to the stop yes, you must, and you crossed the road at a pedestrian crossing. no, if he was there, i would have crossed the transition. and so it is not there, and not nearby either. understandable to the witness. tell you can name at least one of the signs that is located at the edge of the road. well, about two years ago some kind of hung, and then not, but the sidewalks of the carriageway are in good condition. no, on this road in the bus. if you are going to bite your tongue, well, the road is here, and the driver? he also feels that the road is bad. so he must choose the appropriate speed. if you reason like this,

it means that you can say exactly what speed should be on a given stretch of road; the question is removed; the witness cannot draw such conclusions, because he does not have the proper qualifications to determine the speed of the vehicle. okay. the bus stop is located in accordance with all the rules of the traffic rules the question is removed the witness does not have the necessary qualifications to answer this question. then i have no more questions your honor. i have one more question, please. why did you present the application not immediately, but after 2 years. because being sane, i know for a long time who would think that he saw a car from under my nose. at first i thought that some kind of misunderstanding then that something happened, then he promised to return either the car or the money, we called up almost every day, and then he said that he would not return anything, and i had to file an application, that is, at the time of the theft of the car. you didn't realize that

sane acts illegally deprives you of your property. yes, at the time of the theft i did not realize. well, what was not yet open, everything happened in front of my eyes, and now, in front of the eyes of witnesses. lawyer correct according to the documents , the defendant has financial savings real estate, uh, and he is ready to repay material world. why didn't we try to regulate the issue peacefully, he is your comrade colleague. your honor, this is the subjective side of the issue, they make the relationship irrelevant. let's imagine the situation you or your loved ones are standing at the bus stop. and in a second they die or you become a cripple? you want to live in that fear. you and i must overcome this fear, using the full force of the laws of the russian federation. and

as i said? and your honor is compelled to repeat again. it's impossible in this case. can't be extenuating circumstances. last time, my opinion was ignored, as a result, this led to the annulment of the sentences. i hope this time the court will objectively evaluate all the pros and cons and agree with my position, which is by the way. completely agrees with the position of the prosecution. i have everything. take a seat extenuating circumstances. yes, he really committed theft, but he did not hide, the victim and tried in every possible way to make amends for the damage caused to him, and only life circumstances. they prevented him from doing this, i ask the court to take this attention when issuing sentence. of course, the defendant recognizes

the wrongfulness of his actions. he repents and in every possible way helped the court and the investigation of this fact. i also ask you to take everything into account. i have to remind you that there are no identical crimes. that is why the law gave the courts the right to identify all aspects of the crime and pass a fair sentence. the lady is outraged by the impunity of oligarchs who knock people down at pedestrian crossings and drive drunk, but i ask the court to take into account that we are a client at the moment the accident was absolutely sober, driving at the speed allowed by the traffic rules and did everything possible to prevent the accident before that was not enough, but the captivity of the supreme court of the

russian federation in 2008 directly indicated that when determining the degree of guilt of the defendant, all circumstances should be taken into account, namely the condition of the road surface and its compliance with established standards. i ask the court to accept this as an extenuating circumstance. according to article 61 of the criminal code of the russian federation, we do not should use human tragedies to start another witch hunt, just like the injured country and expect. i hope for a fair verdict. i have all your honor. the friction is declared over the trial is removed to pass the verdict

that he is with me we need to make explosives, which you are in small quantities and everything is significant for everyone as they say i hope this will be the last check. tomorrow at 21:20 on the channel russia parting

hope for a meeting some kind of outlet in this the place of the spectators. you love what you do, season 2 premiere friday 21:30 on russia life channel. wow is impressive and notice i don't ask anything anymore, the new secrets of the investigation. go home rest business

will disclose, although from november 28 only on weekdays the best time, and the best time is 21:20. article 161 of the criminal code of the russian federation since the time of the theft of property, the wrongfulness of the acts of the defendant was not obvious whether the victim was in addition, the incorrectly determined amount of damage, the victim's customs declaration, located in the case directly indicates the amount of damage in the amount of 228 thousand rubles, 44 kopecks thus, the defendant committed the crime provided for by article 159 part three, namely fraud committed on a large scale.

taking into account the 2008 number 25 code of criminal procedure, the court sentenced. to recognize sane ilya fedorovich as guilty of committing a crime is provided for in part two of article 159 of the criminal code of the russian federation and to sentence him to imprisonment for a period of 3 years with serving sentences in a correctional colony of general regime. the court session is declared closed to recognize knyazkov vladimir leonidovich guilty of committing a crime under the fifth part of article 264 of the criminal code of the russian federation and to sentence him to imprisonment for a period of 4 years and 6 months. apply

article 73 of the criminal code of the russian federation to the convict and consider the imposed punishment conditional with a probationary period of 3 years. deprive knyazkov vladimir leonidovich of the right to drive a vehicle for a period of 3 years the court session is declared closed i will dig more in life.

sorry, i think i'm late, come on, it seems late. here, it's good that you really gave the deadline. let's go to my office. by the way, do you

know that someone sniffed out that i'm collecting information for you? here they knocked on his stupid head, well, okay, in general, the whole story looks like there was no robbery. it's all set up. in general, this is your common sense, he is the chief accountant of the pension fund, and now criminal cases are being initiated there all the time. well. here and i had to come up with this whole story about a robbery. now they will simply send a man to a colony, no one will be able to interrogate him. but if they let him go, then be sure he was either a car, or he himself would hang himself, or yes, we

live like that. somehow i'm not surprised. and you? i hear.

and gorlovka fired 13 nato -caliber shells at them, wounded. in ukraine, a powerful fortified area and a mortar battery were destroyed, shots of the work of the rocket system, a volley of fire in the grad showed me, on the contrary, the strike of civil servants demands to increase wages against the backdrop of record inflation in the country of 30%