me unmanned systems drones, already today help to find and rescue people to put out forest fires provide security. uh, in the future in a big city. they will be able to massively deliver cargo and solve other problems, but for this to happen, it is necessary to work out all stages of the technological chain, control the safety of the control of vehicles, their takeoff and landing, extreme flights to the territories allocated for testing will begin after the establishment of a special legal regime in this zone. all news are always available on we look at the media platform in the application or on the site look. see you.

good afternoon. this is a program of who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio dmitry kulikov, a few minutes ago, the president of russia arrived in yerevan, where a session of the meeting on the dkb is being held today. uh, it is expected to, uh, make significant decisions that will serve the development of the overall security system, we will follow the news as the program progresses. and, of course. we will inform you about the catch of schulz did, an unexpected discovery caused the current recession in the european economy was not a pandemic. and the russian special operation, and competition from growing economies. asia is trying to explain to the germans that they are lifting sanctions against russia from me and the crisis will still be i don’t think it will help, at least ulovtsev and, together with the g7

, is discussing setting a price ceiling for russian oil at the level. 65 70 dollars per barrel a for gaz - 3,000 dollars per 1,000 km, moreover, e cubic meters, and for all suppliers they are only for russia if we are talking about gas, russia has repeatedly stated that it will not supply energy on non-market conditions, it looks like a grandiose crisis is coming the verkhovna rada of ukraine introduced a bill to ban the russian orthodox church and religious organizations that are part of it this also implies a ban on the ukrainian orthodox church . it seems that in ukraine they intend to simply destroy it, and the coincidence of the draft law and yesterday's searches is in my opinion, it is absolutely not accidental that the supreme court of

britain refused to conduct scotland referendum on independence. well, such is democracy, but according to shotla. this only increases the basis for such a plebissy. well, here the former british prime minister buris johnson opened up about how he fought for the continuation of the war. in ukraine, personally, he defeated key european countries, including france, germany and italy, listen, in different countries there were very different views. i mean, without a doubt, the french denied everything until the last moment. for economic reasons, too, they did not want to be. i'll tell you, now the terrible thing is in for a moment, the germans thought that if this was to happen, that it would pass as quickly as possible , that it would all end quickly, that ukraine would collapse. i couldn't support it. i

thought it was a pernicious look. well i can understand why they thought and felt the way they thought. i remember the italians, who were very dependent on russian hydrocarbons. in a word, they could not support the position we took. well, overall it's great. that is, here, in principle, everything that happened in the end of march until mid-april, right under the leadership of comrade johnson, how he sought, so it’s clear that about the collapse of ukraine. this is not a fact at all, but mr. johnson was the first to admit that it was he personally, who disrupted the negotiations and the conclusion of peace. at the end of march at the beginning of april of the current year. yes. and he confessed to it. secondly, he admitted that in general it was all started in one. well, when did it all go. e, had one of the main goals

to deprive e europe of hydrocarbons to build this very an iron wall with russia and this goal in order for it to take place johnson's buris and the americans needed to continue the war in order for this goal to take place, so that neither the french nor the italians, nor the germans could, uh, so to speak, continue business. ask about the relationship with russia, how can you say this from the south, as usual, these two things the storm has achieved and now, probably, in the hope that they will give him some kind of prize for this, maybe the nobel peace prize. you have to give it to him. i don't know, the whole world decided, well, to acquaint. you see what a fine fellow i am, i personally did it, but there it would have been necessary to add more in agreement with the american owners, but he has kept silent about this for now. yes, as for the bonus here, in general, i think he has a problem, there are none at all. he travels lectures, reads the united states and receives hundreds of thousands of dollars for each lecture, so even the nobel prize. it seems to me that he is not so

interested in such general financial flows. as for the interview, but he said everything frankly. it is very good. when uh so frank somewhere. yes, to evaluate personally, and retired politicians tell how it was for us. summing up. and the score is on the scoreboard. unfortunately, we have to admit that, and everything turned out according to john well, in american in polish, they came out victorious, and finished off their goals. who won, they they yes, yes, and who did they defeat? uh yes, catholic johnson uh ike everyone knows about your love for protestants. there is no need to talk about this three times in a row. maxim so, the winner is johnson and the unnamed biden. and who did they defeat, they achieved their goals and they well here, i answer this difficult question, how to answer it. if after the first sentence you prevent me from finishing. yes, the question is not easy about him,

i'll try to answer your call, and they achieved their goals. you yourself said that a long war prevented the conclusion of a truce in istanbul - that was their goal, if the war had turned out to be short, if we had quickly achieved the set results and quickly and victoriously completed hostilities, then indeed germany would have remained. in economic terms, in the zone of influence of russia, italy would continue to buy energy. but in general, the fact that they have dragged it out so much now. well , look already, italy has freed itself from the e-e of our gas, germany has freed itself. it was impossible to imagine this in the spring. yes, it is , of course, unpleasant for us to admit, but the british, the americans, this is a coalition, when they really want , they can mobilize, and, unfortunately, achieve their goals. thank you, but now you see the word winners, you didn’t say it a second time for a reason. you are also a smart person because, if we say victory, then

britain won the victory of the united states over the european countries, and they are now discussing, well, the price of 3,000 dollars per thousand cubic meters, which will limit everyone. by the way, i think that nothing will work out with this, because it is implied that this is the case. uh, there 50-60% of the u. gas that does not consume, which the americans supply, will also be subject to this ceiling. yes, yes, ha ha three times. here is this victory. indeed, there is a victory of the americans over european countries with devastating score, including the explosion of the gas pipeline. eh, that's all in the baltic. this is done made in the first place in order to destroy europe the european union and european countries as competitors. well, if yes, here, if there is such a one like this, if you record a victory like this, then yes. e america britain defeated germany france and

italy with a devastating score. by the way, uh, that's what you said as well. uh, it's not that they're gassed. well, you said they were freed. the fact is that they were freed. they nothing was released in order not to die right now they are buying five or six times more expensive. here are these energy carriers than they are. drops this. that's why they didn't get rid of anything. they entered the american bondage by a sixfold increase. e energy prices, than i congratulate them, of course, johnson exaggerates his possibilities without the americans. of course, he would not have pushed through all these decisions that were made. this is absolutely obvious to me. what about goals? oh well, the british had their own goals and objectives in in relation to the european union in the first place. it was no coincidence that they also left the european union ; they have their own project, such a european one where they wanted to include poland, ukraine from a strange beam, and

so on. that is, this is competition with germany, of course, of course, in this fight, let's say, of course, the british are by and large. they u beat them. ah, the germans. yes, i have no questions there at all. johnson well, he cynically acted lobbied for the interests of his country with his project to me questions to the europeans. well, if it were some kind of mystery, you know, it would be incomprehensible not obvious. yes, here are the processes that took place before our eyes, but one could say. well, maybe , i say, every ukrainian. well, these are scarecrows , and even, well, after all, everyone was talking about the consequences that would be as a result of these decisions, and they understood perfectly well. what will be the consequences, first of all, for europe itself, but, nevertheless, they went. they unconditionally impeccably carried out the will of the americans and came to what they came to now they are looking for the guilty there russia the asian countries that develop it are to blame

. well, brilliant idea. well, this is it. sorry, you know how the locomotive of the european union, how schultz, someone to see advisers suggested to him an ingenious combination of information. look here . right now, everyone is blaming, and activity is really growing there, at least in all the eastern german states of the egdrov former, both the intensity and the number of people coming out to protests are becoming more frequent. so internal protests are accumulating in germany, they might say , you know, here they are all protesting against that you caused the sanctions to break off relations with russia and him because. well, there’s no way to get around this, you understand, this is the point, it would still be even if there weren’t these sanctions and this war wouldn’t exist, there would still be competition with growing asia e. would transfer these energy carriers from us. and we would be in the same position, therefore, this is such a trend,

however, you understand that we have not even gone half way. this is not the end of the story, you know, for europe, for europe, this is not even the middle of the road. here this is just the beginning. there will also be economic consequences. we can't just take everything and bring it back. let's say. well, you know, let's start buying cheap ones at ranetki again, this will not happen, neither the next year, nor the next five. and what does this mean? does this mean the germans? no matter how much they work at home there, right? well, uh, the competitiveness of their products, in fact, in world markets. they can generally say. so the italians and cars do not fit in; production. i don’t know how they are at all, but what to do with fertilizers? well, drowning is a big problem for rural areas, everything is so interconnected that we will observe the consequences in the next three years there, i don’t know 5

years, and we will see the consequences of all this. i have already cited this figure according to the most conservative estimates by an economist over the next four years, capital can escape from the european union not necessarily to the united states of america but from seven to nine trillion dollars can leave them they can go where they can go to america where there are energy resources, they can go to stable china. i don’t know india anywhere else, but they will leave europe, you know, they will just leave from there, because if you, if the state is not able to, to ensure an acceptable price for energy resources, then doing business there is pointless, because this is the basis of the economy without which it is impossible to move on. yes, but, by the way, this is not uh, here is johnson, of course, now the times have come somewhat different. now it's out in the open do, firstly, he did not hide it. yes, and secondly, now i decided to tell you more about

how he did not hide it. and here it is 15 years ago. well, somehow it was impossible to do it publicly at all, but they didn’t do it publicly. here is an interesting memoirs of a frenchman. it's the ex-secretary to sew on if they're wrong. in 2006, after the war in iraq, jacques schrac was very concerned about the balance of power in europe; he was also very worried about ukrainian issues. you know that in russia there are revanchists, people who, i would say, want to return ukraine, which has been for centuries russian jacques chirac was very worried about the independence of ukraine he had a very close relationship with the president of ukraine which at that time was the soil jack widely sent me to moscow with a colleague who now holds a post in china we met with a representative of the president, whose name was sergey prikhodko and i proposed to him a draft plan, which was as follows. why can we afford joint defense of ukraine russia on the one hand

nato on the other, which would be carried out under the leadership of the council, russia nato established in the early 2000s. it was a way to neutralize russia while at the same time protecting her, defending her territorial integrity, president shrak considered that there are already six neutral countries in the european union. uh, sweden therefore, the position of neutrality in europe cannot be called a deviant position, rather, on the contrary, to my russian colleague. this seemed an interesting institution. he told me we are interested in it because it solves the crimea issue for us. at that time, the black sea fleet could remain where it was and crimea could remain ukrainian. he asked me. you haven't talked to the americans yet. i wanted to meet you, i'll ask you later, then i went to washington met with kansas who held the position of secretary of state and was

my constant interlocutor during the war in iraq that harsh sometimes clarity. i would say, i knew, she took my paper, looked at it and said, well, send france. you have already blocked the first wave of entry from trance of central europe to block the second of this, we realized that, of course, we appreciated the entry of ukraine to the americans. so it turned out. come wide. it only says 2006. kuchma i think he moved a little closer to the time. yes , most likely, it was 2004 and the cancer had already started fra. kuchma was still there, so the only thing there, if there is a reservation, then only by the date of 2006 of the vase everything that happened to you is clear, but personally, i was interested in hearing johnson because i knew, i thought, personally, as a person, i considered him criminal. i thought that he had blood on his hands,

because it was he who came to ukraine to meet zelensky and said that everything should be decided on the battlefield. it was all this, all of us we were all witnesses , now he simply named it, and the reason is the investigative connection. but the only thing. he said that it is we, that is, not only him, yes. well, we understand who is second. yes, it is clear that this is the united states of america, that is, at this point , you understand, i would like to, you are not talking for the first time. here is europe and not there, here they don’t have this is not. i would. you didn’t fight for europe, you say everyone will withdraw trillions of dollars to everyone. and how did they get dollars to europe, who prints them? this is what prints dollars, and that one takes it, therefore, therefore, let them worry themselves there, as regards the present moment. yes, the only one. that's very good. here is the french politician. yes, he said in 2000 today. i read with a german political scientist. oh, such an article. he says that in 2000 it was the year 2000 that the german-russian forum was organized

petersburg e, petersburg forum. he dialogue yes, so it developed, that is, civil society, businessmen communicated between today. it was the petersburg dialogue that the germans ordered to live for a long time, they said, we are breaking off relations, that is, they voted for the fact that this floor was back, well, in order. this is how the germans used to look. we could not imagine how the germans would be independent of russian gas and so on. and today the germans have decided to break even the citizenship with russia. and in relation, that is, at the level of ryazan societies, what i'm talking about. so what, this is how the situation has changed, the situation has changed and why it has changed so much, because the germans say. and what should we say with the russians while the war is going on and that surrender now. that's what, but now europe has its own problems, but nevertheless , europe is at attention in the same stream. each country is more or less, but it puts its share in the war, which even invests goes to

the territory of ukraine what are you, everyone united not only not one, who is there, maybe hungary is there against in serbia says something, but everyone has problems. so why am i saying that and it was impossible to predict that europe and the united states would change like this, and they would oppose russia. yes, i’m still on the territory of ukraine, i’ll tell you frankly honestly. here i am well, i think that there are forecasters, where they sit much cooler than me in puddles. i'm not saying this just for the sake of it. listen to me, please, you've been talking for a very long time. unfortunately. well, i can't seem to get anything out of this, he'll have to somehow answer this question of yours, which you, after all, could have asked immediately without reasoning. here, look, they sit there cooler than me, but you can look at the videos and all the records in the archives. that's what i said. that for them the key goal is the separation of russia and europe, of course, and there is a very small chance. i am

quoting myself verbatim. this is a few years ago. there is a very small chance. very scanty at all, that europe will be able to survive. well, i said, you can leave this chance to them. nothing will change from that we ourselves will now start something, well, in relation to not doing them. here's that little chance. 2%, for example, five, too, should be left for the fact that europe will be able to resist and subjectivize. it did not take place 95 against five. it was obvious. this is the first one now there are about 500 million people, but do you really think that they will not find a way out of the situation that the eu is the first of your bad life a second, do not know me about their way out. i absolutely don't care. you listen, please, you asked a question. you and me 500 million people in

i do not discuss this in europe. you asked a question. you couldn't calculate that it would be calculated with a probability of 95 against five that it would. is this the condition that should e lead us to sacrifice in the field of security and put the whole prospect of the country on the brink of death? of course not, but we have strengthened its security. we are strengthening it. yes, maxim, we are strengthening it in finland in nato, uh, you know as much as possible that uh, you know that we are strengthening our security. this is a very difficult difficult process after the ninety-first year. here we are obligated go this way, because there is more security. all of us from the country and the state as a whole do not exist, you understand nothing else, this is a matter of existence, so we also discussed this many times. you really want to ignore it

all the time to find some loophole. but if that were the case, you see, if yes koba was 8 years old with the minsk agreements, and when the decision was made to hold their own. it was accepted, you know other options. it just didn't stay. you didn’t have to understand, and delay with this led to the fact that we would meet all this somewhere, god forbid, in the volga region, at least on the don, that's what could happen in this case, and i have no doubts about it. and you ask me if we understood that this would lead to a break with europe almost 100% understood you, because europe would be sacrificed, which happened. that's all you understand. but you understand this, this is a simple elementary analysis, you understand, if you conduct a substance or elementary

analysis instead of emotional exclamations and waving e emotions, it will be much more useful. you spoke so emotionally, i had to do the same amount, but it is still obvious, the truth in this analysis of yours, what will happen to ukraine in this analysis. well, if you continue his logic, i will not. well, i don't know when and how. you know what 's the matter in order for it to exist. it's like now saying you can't go back, you need to make sure that she stops, in principle, on a table of interest and also with a guarantee. have the chance of ever becoming a life-threatening death threat to russian federation this is what should happen to her, if such conditions are met, i don’t know how i don’t have a fantasy for this to happen to the americans and your idiots. there are americans, there are your idiots. as long as they

exist, i do not see a scenario in which ukraine becomes absolutely no threat to russia in its security and for millions of people i do not see. they do it creatively, we do not have the goal of destroying this ukraine. no, you understand, but because, just like with europe, it was thrown into the furnace. we are not americans. so you ask them. well i'm like i just wanted to remind you, maxim, if you remember , the spring before last, and since the spring before last, we have been very actively trying to delay this war at all levels. let me remind you how, last december, putin's appeal to the west with a request, as it were, more precisely, with a request for a whole series of proposals, how can this be avoided? well, you remember it was to start negotiations? it was enough for the americans to say that we are starting negotiations. we don't agree on

anything, but we start negotiations instead forgave, the americans said, we don't know who such russia all of us with it also have begun. they cleverly lured us into a trap in which they lured us into a trap. understandably trapped. we ended up in the ninety-first year, maxim and painfully 30 years trying to get out of it, forgive vlad that in this case, again vasily agree that, if you remember those e can be called the requirements of russia, then compared to what is happening now with ukraine and with ukraine it was generally some kind of kindergarten. it was you know, it could be negotiated. here at the snap of your fingers you see, it’s simple, if you still remember those conditions today, uh, i’ll go back to what i said, maxim agrees with him, and today the uk and the usa are the winning countries. well let's add to this plot of events. on this site, they have achieved a lot. associated with europe, but the main goal was certainly not europe, the main goal was to remain russia

. that is, if, as a result of the whole, russia is completely preserved as a state independently and solves its goals, then it will be. well, let's just say a private victory you can't call it global, because russia is certainly preserved in such a conflict. it is becoming a qualitative, different country, both internally and militarily economically, one must understand. well, today, for example, the demand for our weapons has grown there, well, by a whole, as if at times, because how it sees everything, and everything is unconditionally evaluated today. uh, everything is decided anyway on the battlefield, no matter how we treat it on ours all over the world, you just won’t believe it on lancets. yes, we don’t attach them to our same ones there. they are still on front are needed. do you understand the order is made for years to come, and not what you understand right now? well, why put extra hairpins on each other, because we ourselves understand what we are talking about. here. uh, accordingly, in this case, of course now the key question is how events will

develop further on the front you need to understand that today we are actually anew. uh, we are designing the actual army, that is, as in the 19th century , we once switched from professional to mass armies. today we have our own professional army turning it into a mass this is a very complex professional process. it was not passed from professionals. initially, it was painful to read . transition, you know? now one second maxim a. here's how you feel comfortable. you wanted it like that, you wanted to talk, no, yes, because vlad, firstly, he is my friend, secondly , congratulates him, and i answer him, and we, in my opinion, are quite normal with each other. if you want to stop talking. i'll be honest, i'll be honest with you . i didn't see vlad asking you a question. he asked you not to let go of the hairpins, but you immediately continued. here, well, just peep, then the material is so for

personal acquaintance, you understand, i’m finishing yes, please, i ’ll explain about whether it was possible to calculate earlier, you understand, it was not even possible for americans to read such a war before, despite the fact that now they are very strong do not operate the ability to calculate a major european war, judging by the military doctrines, according to the state of the armed forces , no one today had europe fighting with us through ukraine tearing out of himself everything that he has not what he had prepared. and everything that he has, because the rate is too high, because if it doesn’t work out, then there will be a completely different world, and all this is excellent, the americans understand that they are already tearing weapons out of themselves, not taking them from warehouses, because they don’t have them in warehouses , not in europe, therefore, yes, no one calculated the war, including us, because no one could have foreseen such a war , moreover, today for us, it’s really a very important process, as quickly and efficiently as possible carry out the reconstruction. the biggest army, because when we do, the situation will certainly

begin to change in a completely different way. i'll just add very important functions, in fact, the question is important. you just have to ask it. well , let's go, yes, let's talk. they are now not wedged. look, uh, according to two parameters, you described one about the doctrines and concepts of waging a future war in all gentabs in all worlds of the whole world, by the way, about american parents. they , uh, well, they threw it away, and then it all went, that in conditions of nuclear deterrence, no big field front-line conflicts. impossible in principle, this will not happen. therefore, it is needed. uh, small small army mad rapid reaction force corps, overtrained in manning and this picture is fucking clouds of that knowledge. well, we started doing it. eh, just a little there. well, this knowledge was all in general. by the way, inside you can say some things here, by the

way, the first part of whether to do it? here. and by the way, we have had great success in driving the mouth into such an ideological state, but between fetishism and nazism, as you wish. yes, even built hundreds of people, maybe it was possible, we had to go there to communicate with them and listen to those who imagined that ukraine was mentally sweaty for us and it was clear that they would resist just like that, but people went. and you remember, no, no, we will be met there with flowers. now they still go to the air, and i'm ashamed of my ears, they didn't blush, but you don't understand. eh, maxim, you are with these people. you can argue all you want, but they didn't do it, like, yeah, wait, i guess you could argue with them. as much as you like maxim but the point is not in this concept, not from what people on the air, they say, it does not arise from what people say. by the way, i'll tell you one more thing, that if, well, there was a sovereign subject

in ukraine, none of this would have happened, because everything will end with the same result that he is asking about . e you and but there will be hundreds more for sure, of course. yes, we can say there will be hundreds of thousands of victims to ukraine, that will be the result, because america and britain will be happy. act subjectivized ukraine was thrown into this fire, but no one in ukraine. well, the victim didn't count. that's all. if there was a real ukrainian subject, then, perhaps, this would not have happened. and now, if we assume that you thought that there was at least some kind of subjectivity there and did not agree in the nineteenth year, that with whom putin met in france zelensky in the nineteenth year to speak even on the gas agreement, if not signed. the news should here is the moment when zelensky agreed on a

politicized agreement on the disengagement of forces directly broke at the meeting. yes, they say that after the corresponding call was not i can not confirm, but very many people say. yes, there was even a collective dream tore the initialed agreement. it was he who made the painting. i am no longer a subject. and after that, vasily went to mi-6, that's all, it turns out, it means according to johnson. yes, this meeting is an interview. this jeoseong conversation means that a demonstrates it demonstrates, and conversation means a host from his vassals. here he sits a representative, which means a world angel protestantism, despite that he, which and it does not know it does not matter. who is the head of the catholic in america? who is in charge there, is britain the hindu. or there or in america, they will do the will, the anglo professions. and your leadership was protestant ethics, this is the point, even this francophone, which means that canadian harm

will also fulfill the will of the anglo-protestants, so this is not a question here. about who some religion, namely the will. and that's what he says, that's what he says what the president says i'm sorry that every time i refer to life, because damn it. he said all this about it, they, despite the fact that he will be polish jews. it reflected anglo-protestant politics. and so he says what europe needs to do under control. russia in her europe to prevent the approach of germany and russia, it will be the more, russia forgive me for god's sake. i'm honest . here i am, as it were, all the arguments i can listen to, but here's the facts i said not in life. that's what they said for a long time, even discussing some one to discuss. well just justice, discussing the concept of nato and american views. therefore i refer to it. i can say that it was necessary in the nato doctrines, it was

yes, and look, it means that the more europe got closer, the more they invested in it, that it was a pipeline and so on, the more the anglo-protestants brought a powder keg to ukraine because this was the only point which could be blown up and not be said, the englishman won - this is a victory, the word is not appropriate here at all, because all this is still unknown process, who will come out the winner thinks that we will come out the winners, i'm here, if maxim had this in mind, then i agree that the american occupation in relation to europe is completely established. i would agree if this conflict was already over in ukraine and the europeans turned out to be, well, the process is underway. we don't know. as a result of this, what will happen. i think that we will win them back the sovereignty of europe, i guess. yes and so, then america is the british, which means. we knew it was going fast

rapprochement of europe well, masha the trouble is, it turned out that not only ukraine was not sovereign, europe was also not sovereign. although, france is a nuclear power. it could have behaved a little cooler, as the shahish cancer tried. this one is completely useless. and germany already excuse me there, but there merkel could still have economic sovereignty when promoting interest in the economy. and in general, everything was handed over there , you understand, therefore, in the process, we made colossal conclusions. here is what we were wrong for 30 years, that the pipe is oil, there and so on. everything decides, it turned out not to be so, and we are now rebuilding. we have resources, glory. god has more than europe than ukraine and so on, so the chances of our winner are greater than theirs, by the way, more than once one of the programs with your participation in our discussion. i say the germans are building the northern streams because they understand that the americans. well, fitting, yes, you understand that the americans can at any time in a conflict. to blow up gas pipelines through ukraine was wrong. i

blew up only the northern streams in one. well for that there was no alternative. and now it is possible, in principle, to blow up the ukrainian ones calmly further. basically, you can do it. well, here vasily asked, they could have calculated that europe would turn away there. well, they could not. here the question can be immediately returned. uh, here we are today, yes, in this studio and now here comes right now news explosions are heard in kiev, local media reports uh, interruptions in the water supply of electricity. uh, klitschko confirms that the missile hit the infrastructural, uh, facilities of the capital, and so further, and they could have calculated in ukraine that everything that was done could lead to this, or they could have calculated that the failure to fulfill minsk was one and two. then here the paris agreements will lead to what has led. they could calculate that hundreds of thousands would die on the map. they could count. they

could calculate it, and europe could calculate that now the most serious european economists are saying that the european economy is sinking . here such a wording was given to the doctor today, because they are just talking about what we are now seeing as our economy is moving to the usa and china. well, yes. there she will go somewhere else, maybe someone could read it all, you know, such a question all the time, as if it were real. uh, you know, he has always me as a historian of a person who has received a historical education. it always just pisses me off. here is the feeling that before uh, it means the beginning of a special military operation in february of this year, the war, as a decision of political accumulated economic, means problems. she never existed in this world. this is the first time that the russians came up with this and that's all. listen, russia had an absolutely

clear investigation, it can be argued that it is right or wrong , we read not russia had an absolutely clear position back in december and even earlier than last year, when they said this is a red line. this threatens our security. if this does not happen, if at least we do not enter into negotiations with you. this will lead to very serious consequences and now these consequences. we we are pressing everything together, yes, all together, and we, too, no one says that we are sitting fine now and rejoice that there is definitely a war - this is a war. this is the worst thing that can happen between people. yes, when they go to kill each other, but this is a fact russia warned about it, they brushed it aside. russian general, well, we have proposed so many options, by the way, here are yours about this very one about the strikes that continue and air raids. just let me, danila, i'll show you first, yes, it's

what your consumer is watching. we have certain types of weapons on the territory of the russian federation that work flawlessly. we have an understanding. how many missiles are left, less than ten percent is left, there is a rocket left 18% unfortunately, it remains to hell on the territory of the russian federation we are talking about missiles out of 300. so it remains that they have too many of them now, zaporozhye, kherson, other territories in kharkiv region, therefore, that they have a lot of communication. in general, he said yesterday in percentage terms that we have in once again, everything is over, and today there is an air alert almost throughout ukraine and explosions in odessa, odessa region, nikolaev, poltava,

dnepropetrovsk, dnepropetrovsk region, kiev region. well, i saw at the time of entering the program. well, can you tell me now, they write to me from kiev right now, just last night. uh, midnight there was no light, in the morning there was light from 9:00 to 12:30, then explosions sounded, an alarm and a man is sitting in the subway. uh-huh it's kiev life right now, so of course there's an explosion. and they were there. to unfortunately, there will be tactics. she, uh, such tactics are being carried out. i think that if this continues in the military sense, of course, the russian armed forces will be brought to their knees, and ukraine because there has already been a statement that 50% of the infrastructure does not work. i think that every day it will be ten more and ukraine will become. i mean the economy will become, but it will live. i don't know what people will do, perhaps

they will all leave, but they will also leave, but you know, i, and not in this studio, but in others. i heard a lot russian experts. even ladies politicians in the fourteenth year. yes, we didn’t go to kiev then, they didn’t go there, because we were afraid, uh, we were afraid, what sanctions would there be? but now, over these years, we have understood everything, we have read everything. we are all prepared. here now yes don't care. we have been saying this for several years, and this is what max told me. i have a question. and what will happen if russia loses on the battlefield in ukraine what will happen if you take your ukraine away? crimea is what will happen is russia ready, i will answer you this question. you think it's so murderous, no, no. i'll explain to you. we talked, but i'll tell you, i'll explain to you. here russia will not lose on the battlefield. here , uh, the second is the first principle, the second principle,

each of our proposals for peace will be worse for you than the previous ones, taking into account. uh, plus four areas, you should understand that very well. uh, in april there was just a recognition of the sovereignty and independence of donbass correctly. right now + four regions as part of the russian public critical positions further for and therefore they do not make any legal problem with respect to the indians. they dont have. you see, no basis is needed here, ideological propaganda is needed to inspire the fools who read and say newspapers, well, the terrorists, of course , received confirmation that the parliament voted. now the rationale is clear. yes, all that i have carefully studied what was written about the draft and the resolution, which most likely, uh, today will be uh, adopted there are two justifications for in order to declare russia accomplices of terrorists. this is action. e, as part of your own and before this action, you start chechnya chechnya syria

was arrested and that's it. e. yes, that's all, why is all this being done. exclusively. how to put it correctly, in order to create a background and some appearance of a legal basis, a legal legal basis for possible actions against russia, that is, to make the war against russia total, supposedly pseudo-legally justified and supposedly confirmed by the will of the same european parliament, the resolution itself. she is, uh, advisory in nature, and in general, not obligatory for execution, but the background and the visibility of dust in the eyes of a blende screen it creates and will most likely be created today. that's just interesting. here is the entire list of american intervention with a rout. yugoslavia starts on the territory of the very same europe of destruction. yesterday we are mcgregor. i showed you and told you an american told how they destroyed civilian objects, bridges, factories and all that stuff, this is the question, it’s

absolutely not worth the americans doing it europeans, there’s not a single word of hilary clint’s us statement, but interesting, of course, yes curiosity. i must now say that this is the second in different places. this is 2010, and there is 2009, where she sets out all this in even more detail. she's just like journalists noticeably. it is interesting today , of course, to try to project, because it is actually recognized. yes, they helped create those who later blew up; they didn’t help, they created. well i say it. well, i 'm always i always have more. hmm yes , diplomatic language. i don't think they are the only ones the pakistanis did a lot of things there. they single- handedly created, but nevertheless the american essence of the essence is changing. but will there be something similar in ukraine with the americans good, as for me, i asked myself. by the way, i thought

that one of you would pick up already prepared as a response remark. i think among the kalami. well, with the conditional belets with the conditional azov, it will not work, because we know their venality. we know that they work for those who give them money. here they will not get out of control, but on the whole emboldened ukraine felt. here is the universal love support. and also winning, god forbid, on the battlefield. so at some point it will turn into a serious problem for both europeans and americans. we do not really like to talk about this, because for our aircraft. i have everything sooner or later and this problem will definitely arise. here ukraine look can become a danger. thank you for touching. for some reason, you assumed that we would hide from her somewhere. here i have everything in order self-esteem. well , if you missed this program, colleagues will tell me discusses this on a regular basis. this is the key issue. and the point is not that in the event of a victory there,

no victory will not respond to advertising, but the best of the world this is a catastrophe, and not for any negotiation process, they cannot go to the american military understand that a military catastrophe is inevitable. and those who manage this whole gang understand that if peace or a truce is declared, what will a million armed people do, who will disarm them, who will support them, as if inevitably together, what will they do after the war, the us military understands that a military catastrophe in ukraine is inevitable sooner or later. they understand it about this mila speaks about this text of time. yes, but i tell you that the problem is with a million armed terrorists. maybe, well, if you drew an analogy of bandits, if you have more than 700 million, you know, maxim. i

don’t know the men. maxim, if you would have discussed it like this. become regular and already more than the executions of prisoners of war by these bastards, then maybe you would not have asked yourself such question, because i developed to learn certain attitudes towards him. that's what to do with them, if there is peace or a truce with this million, no one knows, and in this, the main danger. i just see in this case a very big threat to the world. what you need to understand is that he somehow correctly said, a million people, in this case it is also a huge political factor, and a european one, and a reverse rebound, as they say, uh, drug addicts of this situation can be sharp in holding europe because what the very nazis who today have united and are fighting with the european nazis against the russians, this whole group will begin to return very soon to european politics and will be converted into it, and just a sharp arrival, as if

i want to the right to european nazism, which seems to be considered crushed, which is now considered marginal very soon we will see that they will begin to turn from marginals into a political force , and moreover, against the backdrop of the current, sagging economy against the backdrop of all the problems that exist they will become popular. what does this mean for today's ukraine for today's i will try to answer by combining the two statements of johnson and clinton only if they are summed up, yes, the organization of ukraine, we heard this moment. at the very beginning of the operation, the organization of ukraine was said, and this was the goal of the americans, whether or not there was an organization, i don’t know, but there is a legal military formation in ukraine, besides the armed forces of ukraine, the first second is more than a million people, citizens. ukraine received weapons. just please, got a gun and a third 14.000 trained by britain is now the second batch. now. they said that they would train germany. i mean

they would train trained military personnel in european and other structures. and now dmitry see my logic is like this. i don’t believe a coup armed in ukraine the way it was in afghanistan yes, the extreme leader united there, they elected, they killed them, and but if this happens and if the armed uprisings translate everything as people want, they will come to power and say, that’s who you want poroshenko leader. well this is one of the best, what will russia do then in what sense? do you understand? you understand that these people are crazy. they will continue to fight, we will continue our special military operation and that's it. nothing will change for us. nothing will change for us. absolutely, that means he was telling how he started, when the cia and agents, that means, came to afghanistan and began to create these detachments. the question is what on what basis on what basis should these

chess be created ahmad suggested everything on the basis of the national liberation struggle of afghanistan is rotting. he speaks yes, the soil of religiosity. islam and we thought, and where does islam we even liberate afghanistan, we say then did not understand. what goals did the british have after, and then after and you are in the troops of these islamists. they could easily throw any point of view in order to spread means to defend islam and we saw in chechnya we have in the ninety-fourth year these afghan terrorists. and then it went already, which means that the territories of syria were transferred from there, therefore, al-qaeda, which in syria will turn into a jabhad. musa then branch islamic state and uh iraq and the lebanese. and the guards went from there, ours and so on. all these organizations were under the control of the americans and , therefore, the british. and what are you? here you are saying you will still do them if they lose correctly and different countries will go that will need mercenaries, good mercenaries. these people earn short money there, there are two figures that

indicate that there is nothing for the emobilized in ukraine to do 7 million . thrower machine is only when they have jobs, there is nothing in ukraine, they will fight and look for sources. this is where they will be sent to the territory of ukraine and to the territory of ukraine and i will not want to fight. naturally, they will be ousted from the territory of ukraine because the operation will also end in success. well, we must understand that the country that has turned into a mercenary. the country itself is not only people, of course, it is also in this regard. here is its current statehood, simply doomed. yes, why did i tell you? you're in vain so it is with me that nothing will change. you are hinting that someone is allegedly holding back now, and then they will, like, go on carts. well, it means that there will be a general destruction of them, those who will go, those who will run away, and someone will go to kiev to rob in different ways. you see, in this sense, it’s not us, we

didn’t create it all, it was created by the united states, europe had a hand in this and now they do not understand the way out of this situation. they don't know it, they don't have it. and he really doesn't. there may be only one scenario here, understand? well, we discussed it, there should be a place where they should escape to poland. well, for example, yes, well, in the western region there is good nature. eh, this same truskavets sources. here you can dig and so on. here it is here it is possible, well the possibility of a scenario. i repeat once again, they created it and just like with those gils or icarids they don't know what to do. and this internet in europe is unfortunate, especially for today. i have everything right now, watch the news program and

see you tomorrow. informational tv channel service russia continues to work on the air. my name is mary hello. vladimir putin flew to yerevan to participate in the csto summit uralchem ​​asks to include the ammonia pipeline in togliatti odessa in the grain deal, let's see.