in the morning, in the application or on the site we look.ru, we will all see you by this hour. good afternoon. this is a program, who is against it on channel russia 1 and in the studio of dmitry kulikov, france, on an informal level, admits that it can no longer supply weapons to ukraine due to problems with its own reserves, the politics magazine writes, exchange gas prices for the first time since october 13 exceeded 1700 dollars per 1,000 cubic meters and the forecast for further growth, prices are positive, the same france came to strange victories in the

total economic war against russia, which announced back in march, the french economy and finance minister is now preparing for the blackout in the winter and is coordinating shutdown schedules with local prefectures. this is for the population, but it is difficult to speak for the industry in general. but france was still considered a self-sufficient country in the field of electricity on this. macron makes a visit to the usa is going to fight the american climate and investment law there, which puts europe in an unequal position with america and threatens to split the west dinner with biden, which took place in a warm and friendly atmosphere. here is a photograph, you can see yourself having dinner, there is no pressure from the macron, biden is not found.

although they promised europe is under the full and absolute control of the united states , it will not be possible to restore the old relations with the west in the field of european security. in particular , sergey lavrov, the minister of foreign affairs, spoke about this at his big press conference . look at myks, of course, uh, we remember how nato was created. when the first general the secretary of the alliance, mr. izmey, but brought out a form to keep the russians outside of europe, the americans in europe, and the germans under control. now what is happening absolutely means the return of nato to those conceptual priorities that were developed 73 years ago, nothing has changed russians want to keep. outside of europe, the americans want

yes, they have already enslaved the whole of europe, and not only the germans, but the entire european union is under control, so the philosophy of the dominance of unilateral advantages is nowhere after the end of the cold war tendencies will not disappear in europe. more and more, nato claims to dominate on a global scale are already being observed, and these oceanic regions have been declared nato's areas of responsibility, so what is happening on our continent is of course of interest not only to europeans, not only to residents of northern but and representatives of all other regions of the world , primarily developing ones, who want to understand what kind of initiatives in relation to their regions can be prepared by nato countries that, as i said, have announced

their global ambitions. well, it follows from this that we further in our foreign policy proceed from the fact that the entire territory of europe is completely occupied. that's what the americans proclaimed when creating nato 73 years ago, and not only in the western american zone of occupation, as it was, and so on, right? ah, uh, now on the entire european continent, and in this sense, the occupation zone, the american one, has greatly expanded. well, the second nato does not hide that it is not going to stop in europe, and in next in line is the indo-pacific regi. he, uh where by the way, at the same pre-conference it was said that for russia this is the same concern and the same concern as for china vladimirovich, well, uh, yes, indeed,

lavrov e. this is the assessment of various international organizations, especially the osce. e, where i remembered and in particular their participation in the adjustment of fire. uh, in the donbass, what did we talk about? no, let's just see then european diplomacy. and this is what matters. if you say that let them not see what you are talking about. i have already quoted the offensive word. uh, another barrel saying, uh that stated. uh, when the macron announced, and the meeting within the framework of the european political community proposed by him that he said he would not invite my russia, as well as belarus and then barrel and after him, and mrs. berberg. e, declared e. another new such task is to build european security, not with russia against russia, if this is

understood by european diplomacy. i don't think, that we need to go there, we need to understand when , well, sane people appear in european diplomacy, i will note that, of course, special monitoring missions of the osce in ukraine , which, in flagrant violation of its mandate, did not respond to daily violations of the minsk agreements by the armed forces of ukraine , especially the national battalions, the osce mission, in fact, sided with the kiev regime. and after the termination of its activities, they opened unpleasant facts of its interaction with western special services. the facts of the participation of

allegedly neutral osce observers in adjusting fire on the positions of the lugansk donetsk people's republics were revealed, their participation in the collection of intelligence data in the interests of the armed forces of ukraine and nationalist battalions by this battalion and subdivision of the armed forces of ukraine, information was transmitted. uh, from the osce mission surveillance cameras that were installed along the line of contact. well, yes, and, mind you, we talked about this repeatedly during the so-called anti-terrorist operation, when the osce monitoring mission visits, some object leaves . a few hours later, ukrainians arrive there, respectively, a rocket, and so on, and then after they left, video frames and computers were indeed found, which confirmed

what we all this time suspected and now a natural question arises. why don't we slam the door in this very osce? okay, they're involved in all sorts of raids there. now they did not let our delegation in fact. yes to your summit. uh, well, i understand the contributions there are small. that 's not all, but those, well, they are already in a puddle all from the fact that russia does not pay, and they were directly told to eat, not russia there, in fact, more expensive. well, not such a big percentage pays, there are 5 million euros, but the fact is that because of the position of russia, here are 2 years. they cannot increase their budget. we block, that is, in fact. our whole role now is both the function and the meaning of being in the osce. don't let their budget expand. here, i remember how i suffered about the euro - the european union suffered from the fact that it was impossible to buy toilet paper, which russia blocked it all. well, you know volodya

here. i agree with your position, and it seems to me that what sergey viktorovich discussed today, in particular, about the osce, how it made no sense. yes, how it is used, well, a practical coincidence of nato members by the majority and members of the osce. well, in principle, there is something to hold something to prove something to defend, in principle, it is impossible. pay attention barrel today is going to discuss the confiscation of russian assets at the osce. well, yes, indeed. and what we have to do with such an organization that by its presence and by its simple legitimization i think that the time is over, but here, in fact , there are too many decisions that are made by consensus, that is, 100% voting, and all of all its members, therefore, only from this point of view it is possible, but to block it only if it is necessary, if a fundamental decision is not made on this matter, that this is generally without result, because your decision, in fact,

and in about. it is impossible to push through, that is, russia belarus, we cannot solve anything there, because it immediately runs into literally a concrete wall. and but vladimirovich has already mentioned. yes, the system itself. yes, that is, well, it is necessary, but to understand how we worked with the osce special monitoring missions, that is , there are about 700-800 people who are on your territory, which enjoys indisputable immunity, who travel all painted with names obse on armored vehicles and they are terribly indignant if they were not allowed somewhere, if they arrived at their positions, yes, that is, how is it so we are not allowed there. what did you forget there? what did you forget there? no, we have to go there. we should definitely look there. and here it turns out that this is an organization. it does not work, and an organization that has immunity must keep secret all the data that is and monitors only on the basis of the data that is assigned the task that needs to be. they used, in fact, brazenly, cynically. they used the possibilities of their immunity possibilities of the general. a class on something to play on

one side, yes, and after that with this organization. well, what principles can be preserved here? well, yes, but at the same time, you are absolutely right. i just want to emphasize. here you understand, everything is possible. well, you can't keep it up all the time . yes, until some time, the osce, in contrast to all sorts of european sowing of everything else. moreover, it retained pseudo visibility. yes, all up to the image. yeah but it, well it had to be proven in including the experience that this is all pseudo. and now it's proven it's a proven fact. here it is still interesting to understand how these tools have evolved, because initially. it was within the framework of the confrontation between the two systems and were separate. well, as well as for the communication of the site, yes, and the same soviet union was the initiator of the creation of many of these tools. here for 20 years. it has turned. uh, other tools are tools. this is how we reason when we analyze the ukrainian crisis, how

part depicted a common society, yes, that's exactly the same as these tools they depict. well, that same civilized world, and we saw how it turns into instruments of colonization. that is, in this case, russia simply ran into resistance. well, that is, russia resists. yes, and right there in ukraine, right there, pan vasil, don’t let it be a great lie to make unnecessary decisions, frankly harmful decisions due to the fact that they created just such a false panel of the civilized world, but this is not, no matter how specific americans force. yes, here is an allegedly collective institution for you, and all this is through it. actually took place, including the taming of the elites because it was necessary to carry out institutional changes. and it also needed to be obeyed. or are you in general what you are saying. it is very important to think about this in general, and in this sense, discuss - e, you have a way of thinking about the history of international relations. and there is such an object. yes, the history of non-compliance in international relations is very much this.

it would be important to emphasize and complete the idea that you touched on all these osce institutions , by the way, like the security conferences that gave rise to it, is khimtsin. yes, after all, these were tools for maintaining peace in an inter-bloc world status in a two-polar world. yes, and none of our leaders even this science. yes, at least the politicians of those times, when we removed the blues, dissolved it, or it didn’t matter, it disappeared. but it automatically leveled turned into some other entity. you have all the tools of the blocks of the world and the ability to regulate relationships precisely in the inter -block status quo. if one element from there disappears. so the whole toolkit turns into something completely different, but in this case, into a toolkit of influencing those who disbanded their own

or whose bloc broke up, that is, against us vasily well, according to you, did you want to do this? yes, specialty, of course, just a question, really important. uh, the bipolar collapsed ended the era of bipolar confrontation, sort of like yes, but, but those tools that were during the time of this bipolar confrontation. they stayed they were created by that era, but they did not go away with this era, and thus the world order was so suspended, it seems that this cold war ended, and the instrumental elements that connect states to each other remained this and nato, including this and nato e, which is absolutely optovism archaism of the cold war. it should have ended together. it is the most organization along with the cold war. it did not end, moreover, those same tools created during the cold war began to develop in order to recreate that one. the confrontation that we have

today, after all, sergey viktorovich lavrov speaks about this when he recalls that very doctrine , that russia should be kept outside of europe, but only he gently says about the germans that they should be under control in accordance with the doctrine, but this diplomatic language. and there, in fact, there was a jorman down, yes, that is, it is actually a completely humiliated subordinate power. e, and. in fact, this is exactly what is happening now. we face what is the most archaism, the cold war has been introduced, and in addition to the osce and other institutions controlled by the west, it wants to dominate the world has ambitions in all regions, but in fact, the europeans did not give completely subordinate states of the united states of america and no more, this is definitely completely in this there are no . uh, there's absolutely no doubt about it. but by the way, to see you now, here you are , of course, your favorite topic about peace negotiations , sergey viktorovich also paid attention to this, so listen carefully to the question of the negotiations that

replies to the ukrainians, apparently, in a day or two their american masters said, yes, why are you doing this? we have to exhaust the russian army through you. we must use you to spend the maximum amount of weapons that european countries have, so that later these european countries would buy. from us, new weapons from the united states provided income for our military-industrial complex in our military-industrial corporation. therefore, you guys are ukrainians early. e, expressed their readiness to receive security guarantees from the russians and provide for this basis of regulation. that's about it, therefore, when we are accused of constantly asking for some kind of negotiations in order to gain time, and in order to gather

additional forces for a special military operation, so to speak, this is both funny and unpleasant, because people lie . they frankly never lie about any negotiations. we never asked, but always said that if someone has an interest in a negotiated solution, we are ready to listen and this is confirmed by the example that i just cited, when in march ukrainians asked to listen to them. we not only listened to them, we were ready to negotiate with them on the principles that they put forward themselves, we did not allow them to do this, because the war had not yet brought sufficient enrichment. and for those who supervise it, who conduct it, and they do it first of all, the united states and, of course, the british, and next to this, i’ll immediately show it, yesterday, which we could not see yet, but next to it

, you definitely need to watch it nearby . the most urgent task is to do everything for ukraine to win, as an independent sovereign democratic country in europe to call everything we have it is about the military economic ukraine is exactly what we do if ukraine that's it, in fact, that's it. actually, the statement, of course, because he arranged. as a matter of fact point over and understand today, well out of good today. there is enough exchange of prisoners going on. uh, mr. pushinin confirmed that today there will be a 50-50 exchange between russia and ukraine - this is thank god, because last week there was a 23-23 exchange. this is from the good of this savings bank. here in the direction of the real world today, as if ukraine is celebrating the

anniversary of the rise of independence, or we had a referendum in the ninety-first year. we had a referendum. we voted for independence. and so, as it were today, what we are celebrating. it seems that we want to celebrate, and then the table says something, otherwise ukrainians for a second. see the situation is such pay nato this is not a topical topical issues. now you will or won't you stand if you are winners then and if you lose, then the conversation. tough cynical , very cynical, but you know, he cooled his head and politicians, and it is especially important that he condemned the heads of ordinary ukrainians, because when first yesterday morning. the same foundation said about losses. do you know that today, just a few minutes ago, the european union said, the official representative of the european union that they are not going to apologize for the filmed, yes, part of

the publication, they have complete mutual understanding with ukraine. why do you know this? this very painful. these are the most useful questions around which discussions are taking place in ukraine today. it was someone else who was arrested, but the bottom line is that yes, europe. you are right, dmitry europe said that this is true. we just won't advertise because. this is a very painful issue for ukrainians. i translate into simple language, but ukrainians, put up with the fact that more than 100,000 were killed. the military lost him and more than 20,000 wounded you lost this fact with this. now you live and stulberg, talks about nato, you and i i won't repeat myself. the bottom line is that if ukraine is like a fallow land, yes, for which we voted will take place. and what is needed for ukraine to take place, that is, we do not need to be an economically, uh, cool country, we do not need to socially protect, uh, citizens of ukraine, we need something to kill, as many russians as possible and win

the war with russia is very simple very simple and everyone will help us and france will help and the united states of america is where the macron meets, they will all help us. little of, even now they help. they are, but they somehow speak. you know ukrainians, we are dear to help you. maybe, but look, we ourselves do not have enough weapons. we can help you. well, we will pay our vc of the united states of america almost billions of dollars for new weapons. well, this is the new situation. the reality that hit ukraine as a state, which one, when mr. lavrov finishes talking about the confrontation. as a matter of fact, ukraine remained behind the delayed curtain between europe and russia in the buffer and still. here is our buffer state. i do not know the buffer meters, i do not know, but we are in a state where there is no ukraine, which is also occupied by the united states. dmitry, i would say ukraine is a state on whose territory wars take place, including a civil

war, because it’s not like that in everyone ukraine is a territory on which the state was first taken apart piece by piece, and then at the moment an imitation was built states. and de facto there are run by a few hundred. well, sort of different agents yes, one on the line, there is the pentagon cia international financial organizations separately network quarrel, to be honest, this is called a network type of organization about this ukraine so how? i know that it's difficult well, because i'm sorry, here i am , look here, here i am always with respect, when you sincerely say, but something even that i don't like. well, when you start to dissemble, i will explain. well, you were talking here in this studio. here he comes, sullivan yes, and now he will force ours, well, do everything, because he came chief. and today you said this a few weeks

ago, and today you say who governs ukraine, because i don’t know directly that you yourself haven’t snuggled up for a long time. just sometimes johnson calls in. this is what we are talking about, firstly, sullivan remains the leader who influences, but there is still britain, there is still germany, there is still france and even more neighboring states that are friendly to us, but i am already afraid to say something. you know, i'll let you. and the question is very easy. uh, you just need to figure out who makes the final decision though. it was shown to the whole world the americans were forced. why did they curse your all they were forced to come to the forefront and say sh. yes, we are here to decide. well, it was all clear, the final decision is made. what other questions do you have that i voted for independence in 1991. thanks for bringing this topic up here i

'll ask. yes, about the people, i will ask the editors to find a leaflet. eh, kravchuk, just in time for the referendum 31, the year that is celebrated today. yes , it’s celebrated, it’s impossible to say wrong date, 31 year today. so i'll ask you to find kravchuk's leaflet , which then actually said, how ukraine should be arranged. and then we will compare and discuss, uh, that's it, this is the case. here, well, about e pro about e, then, as they would say, e, must go to die and kill. yes, it's directly stated. by the way, sergey lavrov discussed this issue in connection with infrastructures, which he was also asked about. the infrastructure that is currently under attack is under attack. uh, they say there are no secrets about her. no, this is infrastructure

provides the combat potential of the armed forces of ukraine of the nationalist battalions strike is delivered by high-precision weapons and energy facilities are disabled, on which the functioning of the e, armed forces of ukraine depends and on which the delivery of a huge amount of weapons depends, with which the west is pumping ukraine to kill russians, and recently here uh, one of the politicians in europe said it is necessary to supply, and we see the weapons that will get objects deep in the territory of russia and uh talk. e that the west is interested in some sort of peace settlement. we are unimpressed by the west having publicly announced that it doesn't just want russia to be defeated on the battlefield. he

said that russia in general should be destroyed as a player, and some even hold special conferences. uh, thinking about how many parts to divide russia and who will lead? what part of it, so we're deriving energy facilities that uh let you pump ukraine with deadly weapons to kill russians, therefore, it is not necessary to say that the united states and nato are not participating in this war, you are directly involved. very accurately, all this is the answer to the western correspondent. i don't know what will happen there. but what sounded twice. you are supplying weapons to ukraine, arming it in order to destroy and kill russians. moreover, we understand russians as a civilizational ethnic essence. it’s me saying hello to the pope about because, well, ethnically

we have 192 peoples, and civilizationally all russians. here's how it's set up. uh, our life really in fact, therefore, armament in order to kill russians twice, and we will oppose this, because this is a mortal threat and the second arm, to completely destroy russia, this is also said directly and we will oppose this, the devil has been summed up, you know, in fact , uh, our minister spoke, how accurately a diagnostician, defining, in general, the genesis of the ukrainian crisis and this is not the first time that this trouble in relations with the west. well, i think it's very important. and what about after that, after his speeches here, we we saw what stoltenberg said, because in fact, but in fact, the pillars of stoltenberg, which goes by the wayside, it seems to give additional weight by explaining, in fact, uh, why it turns out that way they are different and

uh, these negotiations after all, but what stoltenberg said here. we've heard this many times already. yes, it would seem already, yes, the same thing and now, in fact, and a year is running out, and we hear again that we must continue this, and so on, such a feeling that this is all, and the company recalls. uh, western reminds uh of a car with an automatic transmission, in which the gearboxes are jammed and break in reverse gear, you understand, yes, now, they should somehow already feel that they do not have enough strength. yes resource opportunities. well, there are different speeds in the car, as we know, the back one, so to speak, but here it is not there, there, something like that has broken and we have to go. just understand ahead. even though it doesn't work anymore. although already so to speak, the box is junk, and at those speeds and at the front, but the rear speed no, and that explains what it's about. e hmm sergei

lavrov spoke about the negotiations, again. we remember, like, this. uh, how long has april already passed, yes, but it seems like it was yesterday when they gathered, but in istanbul, it means the erdogan presidents. here he went out so to say that here we are going out there for something and bang. all this was nullified, in general, as if none of this had happened. it's all dried up. there is absolutely nothing left. but does that happen, you know? yes? yes, the son pretends that he does not know, but because you discussing happens only when there are firm bosses, the boss came out. i want to continue. yes , it happens only if there is some kind of prompter or puppeteer, yes, or there someone says regional committee yes, who gives a signal and says, that's enough. we do not need this, and now the west has only one scenario, you know, and for only moving forward. yes, this western collective victory does not add up, and

this, so to speak, is the tragedy of the situation. and by the way, speaking of what is happening on the obs, this is also derivative. this is what you understand. yes? yes, not finished yet. well, literally two words. i wanted to say about the osce, so, but i would like to agree with my colleagues in many respects about the diagnosis of the osce. well, yes, indeed, but it does n’t climb into any gates at all. but here i want to tell volodya. why didn't we slam the door anyway. let's think about it, after all, europe was different once and not so long ago. sorry when there was a war in iraq there were leaders who said no to george w. bush, you understand, right? that is only 16 have already passed, let's define, we are talking. about what perspective. now i agree with you completely now there is nothing to do there. there is nothing to say. yes, but it's forever. i'm not sure, seryozha, do you understand? i'm such lavrov today gave the answer. yes, okay, it won't be no why then are we already

leaving the new version? why don't we leave, it won't be the same, but it will be different, which is normal, i just explained to you formally. it could have been a decision. and that's it. yes, listen to the poles. the poles have no right not to invite. they said guys, we don't invite you. goodbye. don't let a little others, let me yes, i don't invite, don't let me, i want that's all. guys, i'm talking in a different way. i understand that it's all already rotten, dead, broken. i say that there will be new mechanisms? yes, let it be called the eu bu not the osce, i say you understand, right? agree, i am touched by the experience of new mechanisms. well, the laurels said very harshly , it will be possible to talk with them when sane people appear there, well, talk, that is, sane people like that, i tell you that let's let's wait for this in the difference, like a sport in that you say that no conversation at all is possible. wait, as i understand it, yes, first of all, about the

never never say never story. long here we know what will happen in 3 years. not to mention thirty years, but wait, this does not mean that we will pretend that there is no business from the south. all right, then, all right, then, but now we can understand another discussion further. and what are the chances that in europe there will be a new people until then there will be no, u must someone they should give out a receipt to someone. we should show up, but wait. the technology works, right? i don’t know what it is, seryozha, i don’t know what the pendulum principle is, it’s some kind of witchcraft. i do n't believe in witchcraft as a christian. i'll tell you, i'll tell you, as long as american hegemony, occupation, not a damn thing will appear there. and yes. well, that's all at the moment when you and i can state that the

american hegemony and occupation have been dealt a serious blow, that it has staggered and is collapsing. here then you can start discussing whether new people will appear in this situation. they may not appear in this situation either. this is also so to say, well, not guarantors, but you see an important thing, in addition to this. that's why i understand about a about well , here's a war there on the battlefield, there's also this story. well, first of all, uh, i already said, they do n’t have the opportunity to concentrate a second time as much as brandy in august. concentrated on supply, it's interesting to talk, uh, specialist ibid in europe about this and their capabilities. us air force colonel yes is danger, in your opinion, in the coming month, given the problem, which is the steady reduction of weapons by the us and

other nato countries as this war continues to reduce stocks and equipment more and more. yes, this is one of the big problems facing the entire western alliance, because the defense of the industrial base, as all these countries know. in europe, since the usa and canada are really not created for this kind , this fact made it difficult for the west to supply ukraine ukraine uses weapons at a very high rate, of course, and ammunition is another thing that is that the barrels of various guns overheat for the west, especially if the west wants to continue helping ukrainians, in principle, already publicly. and this is not a question of a month or even

six months. yes, there are different estimates, but this goes beyond annual planning. so, how is the temperature there? well, how is it, in general, with everything else , this is one factor, the second seryozha, which you again touched upon. this is still hope for that, and this is with zelensky is wearing this, that now we need to come right, well, to fight, yes, to fight directly with our own armed forces. by the way, i don't know if this story exists. if there is, maybe we can find it. now we will show where lavrov speaks of the danger of such an action in this sense as well. well, it is necessary, so to speak, to consider this as a really limiting line, even a clash of conventional weapons between nuclear powers. but

now we will try it all. and you are ready to show great. we, as i have said more than once, were ready go further and say that not only is it impossible to unleash a nuclear war, but any war between nuclear powers is also unacceptable, even if someone decides to start it conventionally or by means, the risk of escalating into a nuclear one will be huge, including why we we are watching with concern the rhetoric that the west is spouting accusing us of allegedly preparing some kind of provocation using weapons of mass destruction, but the west itself, including the united states, including great britain, including france that there are three nuclear powers. they are doing everything to

increase their almost direct participation in the war, which the hands of the ukrainians, they are waging against russia . a step that will be evaluated, including from the point of view of a possible, well, the resulting threat and the possible use of nuclear weapons. i am speaking on my own behalf, but as i understand it, lavrov's diplomatic language is how i understand him. i very much hope that diplomatic language is also understood in america and europe. in fact, indeed , at the start of a conventional war between nuclear powers always have a high risk of using nuclear weapons, which no one would undoubtedly want to, and here we need to pay attention to two things. the first is not only the institutions of the cold war. e was

inherited in modern times and not only the west thinks with logic on the cold war. there is one more very important thing. this is what along with this destroyed the entire treaty on the legal basis. the west has destroyed everything it could destroy in the field of disarmament. he went out it everywhere and today in fact. this is a huge tabaza, which we have been working on the escalation of world politics, but we don’t have it, so we must, of course, wait for those very sane people who will undoubtedly come sooner or later, but instead, along with this, uh, we need to form and create new conditions, which is what we are doing, but the formation of new conditions. it's not about europe where eh? unfortunately, now these changeable people are not there, but there is no west with which we are very actively establishing ties. i want to answer sergei about the principle of the pendulum. yes, of course, we understand that we are not always in in a state of war of fact, but it’s just that if

this principle is in effect now, you agree with this pendulum, the step of the pendulum is getting bigger and bigger, i don’t understand the mechanics, but the movement is clearly intensifying, because let’s imagine just recently that europe was ruled by people of the level of bergly passion, there, and so on, it was impossible, yes, fundirlanes, and so on, well, we see to what level? leadership of western- style politics. and by the way, kissinger has now written a very good book about this leadership, where he really comes to the conclusion that there are no those e leaders of this level. what were a few decades ago. and if we just now hope that some leaders will suddenly grow out of this nothingness with whom we can negotiate, then, probably, probably, this will also be excessive, we really need to get out of those structures that

discredited themselves, and from which there is no longer any sense and indeed to create, on this ashes. we must proceed from the fact that all international structures have already evolved in one way or another. you are institutions external management. they were, well, we saw it, starting from football and sports and ending with economics, so we need to conduct a full audit in this sense. it happened there because , uh, these same institutions. they are still pulling in a lot. well, many countries are not interested, but they are forced to participate in this. at least as extras, so it seems to me that this decomposition into continental zones will lead to these new sites. well, probably, yes, but you can dissemble a military thing, as always very much cunning, because this leadership, which is not just like that, yes, this is leadership from some subjects of geopolitical e. well, i have politics yes and the

united states excuse me after the fall of the soviet union for 30 years they carried out two subjectifications of the entire space and asserted that there should not be a single subject in the world. we are one single subject and then speaks. and where the leaders lived, so you are 30 years old. he meant not only european ones. no, wait. well, china did not agree, of course, it is not about the americans agreed to be a non-subject. i don’t know if he can withstand endurance, but claims, but a claim. at least you have it yes, but so far turkey has a claim, yes, not all. well, why are you surprised, then, that there are no leaders, when you spent the leisure time of the entire world space, you made it the goal of your policy, and then the caseman is almost like merkel, who is also surprised. how did it happen? sorry, i could n't. i am 18 years old. that's all she did. well, i'm sorry, i didn't get it. and whoever else

sound, i went. you also know those with figs, but i if only the europeans would have listened carefully, because lavrov's tone was very, very unpleasant. this is a very unpleasant response to this russian meeting with the osce and this big press conference, which clearly explains the position, and in quite clear and understandable tones, and russia is here. he says we will use all methods. available to us to protect our own interests, and in fact we are talking about something that if it is beneficial for us to use nuclear weapons, we will use because you decided profitably wrong. and if it’s good, then if we need to solve this problem, we will be forced to use, but nothing will stop us, therefore, in this situation, when they are trying to build a corridor into which all the weapons that were available to fifty countries will go. and we will fight back against him. and there i don’t know with a racket. yes, that is, it is not so, yes, that is, there are now other ways to solve this problem. and if the west does not hear this, then,

accordingly, all mechanisms will be available there was a replica. well, the tone is, of course, obvious. i'm actually surprised how much more self-control there is. or maybe the minister doesn’t lose, when in fact it’s so boorish, so to speak, well, he wouldn’t let me meet you if i’m next year, in my opinion, estonia there should be a squatter, yes, but you know, let’s still try. to find a common point here in the dispute about pendulums volodya , here is dmitry the historian, and i received a historical education, i can confirm that in driving, not only here, the concept of cycles in history is all the same, no one has canceled, you know, do not think that one cycle. it is permanent, you know, yes, we agree with you. the only difference is that they fell into a deep hole, the only difference is that you do not believe that someday someone will come out of this berry. and i hope that the cycle will change and some kind of movement will begin. you understand what's the matter. i'm

protesting against this witchcraft and shamanism. what dances are being replaced? why is this here? yes? here, look up to the cycle. everything, they said in ancient greek philosophy. everything flows. everything changes. yes vir is changeable with this one i will not argue. let 's do this. here. let's not touch the cycles, because no one has described anything alone. the cycle has not proved how they arise, how they change. and that in general all this exists, so i'm not going to believe in otherworldly shamanism, i 'm not going to believe. in general, i do not recommend the historical process to anyone. after that, ten new ones were broken. yes, yes, yes, you see, here is the historical process, some describe it as cycles, which means marx wrote, like a son, like a shift formations and everyone said it was the truth. well, time has passed. well, in principle, we understand that

no cyclic formula, no change of formations, is true. and in general it was possible to understand, it earlier. after all, this is just not about how history actually works, but the authors' hypothesis about how it can be arranged. and if you start believing in hypotheses, nothing good awaits you on this path. and we are waiting for advertising after it , we will continue. there is a pair of medical diethyl ether, that is, she was put to sleep. why new secrets of the investigation today at 21:20 one vote is good, season 2 will premiere tomorrow at 21:30 on the channel, russia

for the new year in general, wherever they take sbp. pay for purchases through bp and check if the winnings on the site hurt your joints. a million carries more than 100 million prizes and your dreams come true lama and another 100 million rubles. which will definitely play new year's dreams to leon, from the national lottery, can take you

to the dream. just buy a ticket on elota.ru and at the post offices of sovcombank the case was conceived to repair. they took a loan from sovcombank up to 5 million. and here you are. use from the light of the wallpaper in the children's loans the father's bank to the branch and online conceived made negative emotions, strong feelings. all this can be stressful for the heart, regular intake of cardiomagnyl helps to take care of his heart health under control. the weather is great, let's go to the park. yes, something hurts the joints of the rain from pain in the joints. rome longevity. especially provide local anesthetic against inflamed against edematous action. though every day we will walk, of course, creams, long for a long time, 150 g of a new large package is enough. a turkey woman

from an ecologically clean region of russia is recommended for children on january 1, a russian is guaranteed to play a billion. buy tickets to return. open the door to the holiday. after all, it brings discounts and cashback up to 100% everything will be profitable in eldorado's video on wednesday. we have turkey kupaty. papa turkey fillet on thursday to friday. all right, it's dad. from the ecologically clean region of russia, even i am the king is waiting for the children of the new year's billion. well i want to win app now.

so return youth. oh, we only need a young 50.000 per hour 3 hours minimum. i understand. maybe he's off to find a real friend. i know what the concept is shared fenya sniff 10 days of this season. maybe only he sisters, i came up with reboot.

for more than a year, the mother did not see her son. let's go faster, when there is still impossible to get through to the child, all sorts of different thoughts go to the head. today he is here. let's meet zhenya malakhov today at 16:30 on the channel russia cinema on weekends anatoly rudenko glafira tarkhanova, one girl was killed by poletlin,

what's wrong with me? this is a program, who is against on channel russia 1, we continue our discussion here in the entire first part. of course, we talked about the fact that sergei all the time called for a look at what the future should be like in the new. there must be some hope there. yes. we have nothing against this, but i want us to take it seriously and on the basis of materials. i'll show you, now the reasoning of the minister of energy is a catator on one very important issue, which, well, from my point of view simply lays the foundation for the future world order. and look at how it should be arranged. look at the lgbt question to the

community you say or the west says criticizing people that we must change that we as qataris and qatar must change our religion beliefs that do not accept the vc and we must do what they think is right, that is, fully accept lgbt kyusha, after all, and where are my human rights. please don't interrupt me where my human right chooses what i want for my religion and my country for my children of my family, in your opinion. i do n't have a human right to choose what i want the smell wants to dictate to us what it wants while the workers, they say, we must guarantee their human rights. i think there is a double standard here. we are a muslim country, a billion muslims around the world, a large number of christians in this way. i don't think

west one second what you mean. they say you don't believe. you say that i should legalize lgbt without problems. come, they arrived today without any problems. world cup, but if you want to change me by telling me that i have to believe that my winter can belong, whatever it is, that is, that i can not legalize lgbt people in my country changed muslim law to please the west, then this is unacceptable . after all, it’s then to please the west and human rights that they are the same for everyone, but i also have the human right to choose what i want for my country. you cannot dictate this to me. you see in this example, this is the whole difference between the approaches of a colonial white person and a person who has freed himself from this very colonial dependence and does not want it to

return under any circumstances, he considers and understands the imposition of lgbt people. and he is not mistaken, as a way of colonizing himself and therefore they will never go for it. you understand what's the matter. they consider themselves ideal. here is the main problem. where he considers himself an ideal, and therefore, everything that does not crawl under our picture should, like in a well- known myth, be an athein. yes, they are sincere they absolutely sincerely believe that they bring goodness and happiness, it consists in the fact that everyone should be like them. and as soon as someone says, where is my right to be myself, they are very yes because not lgbt people are the main means of colonization. the main means of colonization or organization of consciousness. if everyone thinks like americans, then this is a tool. this is a step, and the main goal is for everyone to think, as we understand, the main thing here is the image - this is the hmm casino. here they are the owners of the casino. and

we all play it. we can, in principle, voluntarily play, please only win the host. and the task is to drive all the casinos, and in order to drive all the casinos, you need to create a single ideological matrix. so they create it, and the more natural it goes, the better, because the old matrix will no longer be able to connect with it now. uh, we're looking for some way to keep the old matrix, and they're looking for a way that it can't be saved in any way. uh, well, it’s really a catharsis, it shows an independent position, especially in the area that there is no gas withdrawal in europe increases. if last week it was 0 1:02 tenths of a percent, then this week it’s already 0.3:04%, and the next day it will be higher and it’s the boat that will most likely come to bow, and not qatar already went already went to bow, received 0.3%. yes, we received 0.3% of consumption. e germany, so to speak, you poured 3% nevertheless you see, but it’s

even interesting that it’s even fucking. the west does not have a single position. now the visit of a macron, like a baidu, than not some kind of obsequious speech that we expected, but there is very clear not even his diplomatic statements were that, uh, you solve your problems, but prevent me from solving my , uh, problems, - macron said. yes, you violate there you act aggressively against the business. e european, he said this in an interview, this is him both in an interview and in the first speech on the eve of the baidnych, which was there yesterday e. well, even without the bideno, i looked, it’s interesting they want him there, like appeasing marami with caviar there today at dinner at the white house. well, and, probably, to conceive more promises, but not all europeans have enough money on marras this winter. yes and the next one too, therefore, e explicit there, this is already a confrontation. that is, europe is beginning to see clearly europe is beginning to see clearly that there is not much interaction there. he says we need to agree. uh, our agenda, as if it had not been agreed before, that is. here are the same speeches and how the macron raises the speech, let's say so around you, you need to agree that you have

arrived at all? all clear. thank you, thank you. we will have euro-atlantic solidarity. thank you, you are free. so after a month they will cancel. this is the law. i want to continue this wonderful formula, which is really trying to subjugate everyone, everyone should be like the west, there should be complete westernization. and note that the west can change back and forth. yes, and here, accordingly, the other world must change with it, remember. remember the twenties and thirties, they accused us of having too much sexual freedom here in the soviet union yes, there are such people, and we were filmed by legends that everything is possible here, and so on, and it was not democratic. this is bad. there were still democracy. they considered any call for equality between blacks and whites to be communism. so , we understand that we are not democratic, just recently a

few decades ago, here they changed yeah , and you are there, which means that now you are too boney. uh, too ossified in your own. you should change with him everything that you accused us of yesterday. yes, now you still have to accept us in this, you really need to understand that there are no eternal rules for them. this is what a german journalist said about the fact that well, after all, human rights. they are the same for everyone. no, they change with you there. uh, and the concept of human rights is quite fast, and for some reason we don’t care qatar russia china, anyone should adapt exclusively to them, yes, and i ’ll add one more thing to the fact that our soviet project was said to be an experiment, and any project of a civilizational type , which is put forward as a draft hypothesis. of course, this is an experiment. here we are experimenting. i understood a lot, by the way on the path of the brush, where, for example, can it be and

understand? here they are obtained from steel for more than 100 years, they are very much behind for more than 100 years. i'm not joking now, and without sark it's not often smooth. they had to rebuild a lot of things. many of my principles of the concept, including human rights , due to the fact that there was a soviet one, you know, i will say such a paradoxical thing. and i understand that, probably, not everyone will agree, but at least try to understand my logic, and here they were talking about colonization. you know, i i look at it differently. i, but look at it in the following way. after all, in fact, here, and what lies at the heart of this aggressive lgbt campaign. yes, all over the world this minority, any minority, survives in this way. right now the west thinks that it is colonizing, that it is the majority. it has actually become a minority. do you understand? it’s just that not everyone has realized this yet, because in fact the center of power has shifted to the east in every

sense with an outstretched hand, o lapsholz had gone there before. and and here is this dispute values. so, when this journalist, er, the qatari minister, says, it's actually something that everyone thinks that this is the majority. they already realize that their train is leaving and they are trying this way frantically. you see, to cling to it all, and say no. here we will impose. this is the logic of behavior. this is precisely the aggressive minority, but we have not yet realized. this is because all institutions are formally in their hands the international monetary fund, in their hands in their hands, sergey and so on. do you understand? i'd say premium your scheme. i would even develop it. by the way, by the way, this directly applies to the e hypothesis, but about ancient democracy, and bi-greek in particular. well, what is greek democracy when a minority

is a minority in relation to? it has the right to gather on the mountain and among themselves democratically decide how they will rule all the rest, but in this sense you described, well, as it were, the scheme of democracy. yes, we are a minority, but the widest gold billion, but within a billion there is another minority that governs this billion and all the rest, so within ourselves we will decide to democratically establish the rules. how are we going to rule? it won't work anymore. yes no that's what i'm talking about. i also don't think this will work. they are already demanding that this is their last and decisive battle. and they know it, so they won’t fight in a crazy way for this, but that’s the point, roughly speaking, you side consciousness was a possibility when the west was

really attract. for the economic , institutionally attractive for the east, for the east, with this catching up development, for some reason, for some reason, it tried to run after the west. the west was an attractive model. and today the attraction from the west is absolutely absent for the east that is why doubts arise questions arise. why should we? this lgbt q is there something like that, why? so i just support this idea and developed it a little in the other direction, that there is no need to follow this logic. the east is no longer ready to follow this logic. he is not receives no benefits. okay, before that they were ready to die. okay, if you have it. well , let it be. well, let him be patient, yes, but not today. you're ready because the center of power has shifted there and they believe they can fly. they are already turning around and saying it will be so and nothing. otherwise. right there, he said that she would not ask anyone for permission, they would change for any operations for anything, it just wouldn’t be, and the point, no doubt, this does not exclude

the possibility. interference with her and it will they will do it, but the resources of the west are already categorically insufficient for this. vasily today, the security service of ukraine continues the fight against the ukrainian orthodox church. uh, i went to the monasteries on their salary. and of course, they found literature there and a significant moment, in which one of the books says e fair-haired and e, they accuse the monarchs of the monks of the priests that there is literature that represents russia was such under carpathian russia yes, between the two wars, this is confirmed by russia was in the autonomous and make up slovakia is my ancestors. my great-grandfather my grandmother and so on. when i was little, i was taught christmas carols, and there are carols, but a request to uh, give jesus christ. give us little jesus uh, glorification under the

carpathian rus this i know, this is known to my children and now the security vessel of ukraine is trying to force me. here we are talking about the human rights of me many tens of thousands of people who live there to change consciousness kill consciousness stop. i mean, you understand this. e action that happens here and now then i have a question. and how and why did we tell you for months of the ninety-first year we voted for independence and this is pressure on every small people on every small ethnos in ukraine and an attempt to build this one i don’t know, i don’t know how to call it in the nation, it doesn’t nation, er, one national mono-ethnic ukraine and led to that, one of the problems of the one that is now. exactly this pressure is pushing through and, uh, the struggle of the sonami of thought. unfortunately. i agree, because the basis of this whole crisis is the idea

ukraine set of ukrainian nationalism ideas. here is one that has been transformed during this time. eh, well, in a certain form of ukrainian nazism. here we will not argue on this. i have everything right now, watch the program and see you soon. on the rossiya vesti tv channel in the evgeny rozhkov studio hello, the main thing for this hour is a hotel a kindergarten a residential building three people were injured after ukrainian shelling of the center of donetsk targets western sponsors of the kiva often determine the attacks of neo-nazis, russians want to keep europe in it