the result of the implementation of the green agenda, it seems that quite recently these same people clogged all the pages of newspapers. we went to demonstrations, electric cars are our future, and now the future is under threat ; they can simply ban it so that they don’t drive this future. these are the twists of fate that the chinese embassy in britain called the planned ones gross interference. well, and the actual trip of the british parliamentarians. in taiwan , the agreed policy of us and british pressure on china through the taiwan issue continues the ukrainian authorities, apparently, are leading the case to ban the ukrainian orthodox church and deprive it of the right to use the kiev-pechersk lava, signed by the zelensky decision of the security council of ukraine, the searches, called counterintelligence activities, clearly serve precisely these purposes. in

monasteries and churches, the uoc continues all week macron's visit to the united states was marked by a joint statement with biden at the core , which was mainly devoted to how they would support ukraine and develop military cooperation is not a single word, and the protection of european trade in us relations is not in this statement, and there is not a single word about protecting the eu economy either. biden, answering a question about possible negotiations with putin, put forward preconditions. russia must leave ukraine and said that no one in the world should even allow the thought of a russian victory in the ukrainian conflict. today, answering a question about the evaluation of the statements of the press secretary of the president. dmitry peskov presented the kremlin's position here, listen you quoted joe baid's statement in fragments,

it included a few more sentences that came before this phrase. and he said that putin should be the first to leave ukraine, so he believes that this is and should be a demonstration that putin is ready for negotiations and this changes the essence of what you said, the united states still does not recognize the new territories as part of the russian federation and, of course, it is much more difficult to search for some ground possible for mutual discussion, this first, and the second the president of the russian federation has always been and remains open for negotiations in order to ensure our interests, it was the president of the russian federation, even before the start of a special military operation, who tried to initiate negotiations on the basis of the projects prepared by us and the united states, to be clear. and so that you know that this initiative did not receive and therefore, in order to

achieve our goals, president putin was, if the negotiator remains open to the calm , balanced uh, such, uh, conclusion is a representation of the position, because biden is clearly fired up in this statement. so his, uh, well, in him, as it were, such militancy was very much felt. well, now, they told him quite calmly, and we are open to negotiations, but why, in order to achieve our goals, only all the preconditions. that's with the fact that leave and not recognize the territory. we don't consider. as possible. here, in fact, that's all. today there was a call, mr. schultz, by the way, it was said, on the initiative of the german side, for an hour, they talked among themselves. here. oh, by the way, his messages do not differ very much somehow usually happens usually side by side. and in a conflict

they give, well, as if very different messages, but in this case, i did not differ not very much. here. e schultz said that he demanded, therefore, uh stop the shelling. well, too, yes, this is the temnik spiridon pavlovich, that's right. i forgot. thank you for the dark tip. yes, bring it out. by the way, this is exactly what the ukrainian position is being pushed to, and putin said about this, that is, in our message, that putin said that your position. well kiev's non-surgical support precludes any possibility of negotiations making these negotiations impossible. it was said to the russian. eh, side. well, the rest is the position of the parties. in general, not much. oh yes, there was a disagreement. i understand the intense exchange of views. yes. well, in fact, one conclusion can be drawn and, unfortunately, it is not very joyful, probably for many for normal people. what to talk about is not something that is absolutely not a subject of conversation, simply

not. and this has been confirmed again. uh. yes there and how said at the time, barrel yes, so that everything will be decided on the battlefield. uh, our western, so the opponents are standing and insisting on this, and apparently, it will be so. apparently, it will be so. uh, and uh, here you need to prepare for this absolutely clearly, all the talk about the europeans, they are dissatisfied with them, this is winter, what they are pushing. well, macron went, probably between him and the french press. yes, and the macron himself puffed out the cheeks of a bream. here the macron must declare to present, there and so on. here you go we saw how he showed you know what i noticed. well, according to the journalist, and in many it means, e investigative media in america, the macron, was called the patriarch of european politics. just like that, the patriarch is no longer funny. here and well it, of course, as if there. well, it was necessary to at least flatter something. yes macron

at least something, well, apparently, that's what they call him a patriarch. but because everything else for which the macron went, and it’s clear that it’s the case. it was not even for the sake of ukraine that he was driving there. this is understandable, but for economy. and by the way, it seems to me that this is why the macron went there, already, the street called. it still continues like this. uh, an attempt by france and germany after all. yes who is in charge? yes, which of them the head of the forces crushed, but they are trying to freeze there. well, who is the beloved wife. you see it too, because macron. they called him a patriarch. what did it call? i like putin, i like this one. maybe this is a picture and ras- that's what she said about it. by the way, i didn’t see about the patriarch, but the picture that can be made, so to speak, fundamental handshake patriarch, here. one patriarch, that's about to begin. yes and that's who has a stopwatch. spot it. how long it all lasted and look there for 5 seconds at the behavior of the behavior of

macrons, it is very significant. well, come on already. well, no, okay, well, come on, what is it, and the knight understands this position, do you like it? what is something? listen, and this powerful old man, he took it into capture, in general, and through the american presidents something with these handshakes. remember trump tried all the time, so the hand and the expression persons reduce our responsibility. here we show specifically so that you understand that we are well, there are no exaggerations yes, 45 seconds. this cry, uh, lasted so persistent, uh, max, how did you talk to you about what to expect? how will america be put in place with pasta during the trip and you're talking about signs, and you know, well, the very last thing is to find some signs according to official statements that follow the results in social statements never

say anything. let's look at further steps. as soon as i understood, we will apply this principle in his discussions with you well, of course, and i am an official statement. generally never considered. they did it in order to confuse the brains, including such a patriotic public from all sides, and they have it in america, in france, anywhere. here, uh, so as not to understand the essence, but the essence is still, well, immediately after that, scholz called and spoke. they are often, that is, here, and despite the fact that now it is a lot, even more so. i think that in the case of scholz putin they they spoke the same language, that is, they did not waste time on an interpreter now talking. well listen for an hour. you can discuss a lot of things just to state differences. 10 minutes is enough, so here it seems to me, let's see, uh, i'm like an optimist full glass. here in this case. i think to wait for what it depends here

half empty or half stupid? how to answer, well actually, it's a false dilemma. it all depends on the process. you pour or drink. if you pour, it's half full. and if you beat or pour, then it is half empty, in fact. so, you understand, and all such things and assessments depend on the process in which you look there anyway, right? well, in essence, they expressed my opinion. you see that i am trying to take some optimistic positions in some century, by the way, when i say to speak in this program, therefore, i think that a and macron, he said there, for a reason, with a biden and look at biden's statements, when he said no, we took this here, uh, it means that the decision is ah in economic terms, which is so europeans strained. well, probably, yes, in the end. he says there are some ill-conceived moments. we'll take a look at this topic. that is, i saw it, i didn’t see it, but i read it several times, i will quote

a very close text. there's another interesting one. for us. this is a very important decision - i would say i personally prepared this law. i personally prepared this law. it means that in the united states, thanks to this law , they will develop. uh, the investment industry and all that, well, we'll see there, so that in the course of implementation, well, somehow not to offend our european. you understand the wording of somehow not offending our european partners. she is very exemplary. this is important, like, because when a representative of the main superpower meets with the partners and nevertheless this passage inserts his speech, it means that it’s not just like that and it means, perhaps, of course, they didn’t tell us what they had there during these long lunches, dinners in samara and so on were said to get a scandal. i think, then more yes, dinner cost half a million dollars russian people are not envious. i think, look, i'm pretty good too. i'll

tell you now. so i confess, in my opinion, i have never eaten in my life, and therefore i’m not going to visit our kamchatka hubs. that's why i don't suffer at all. here i am, they write it. not me, you know, here they told you about the sea, such as lobsters. you must have eaten our food. but this is what i don't know. here, yes. i was eating. as you said, remember, the hero of the movie uh no, no, yes, i ate. she can, yes, and the last thing about the patriarch. well, somehow really, considering. how old is the macron against the background of the baidan a little bit of me, like gi shokirova, and then i thought. but now such a european policy, well, the patriarch is not a patriot, but he was elected wet for the second presidential term. and who else among the european mainstream politicians can compare with him, but the dutch people, for example, he is a long time. well, he would be

quite specific, all the more so, he’s friends with straps, he wouldn’t be liked there at all, yes, but in general, that’s all, and holland is not france therefore, yes, he cared for the macron, cared for the aydin. here's a look at how the most important thing is to he did not become the patriarch of barthology. i agree, because we will discuss this topic, because it got to a terrible point, in fact, then you strongly about what i warned you that it would be, and you didn’t believe, but first i’ll show you how macron take care of this one. here there, look, there's a camera there, well, okay. do you understand how a friend, as a friend, as a patriarch, as a brother helped to find out where and from where the bird will fly? they take a piece, i’ll show you more and then i’ll pass

the word about because it was very important introductory speech. do you understand maxim? yes, he showed me where to go. well, in general, well, in principle, the nurse is not a bad macron, it turns out simple lord, but he cares what can be said here, well, here's what we discussed with you and so, uh, diverging a little. it’s interesting, macron’s opening speech, nothing in the opening speech for the sake of which he came there about this very one, well, he didn’t say the european trouble, he was talking about something completely different and here is a discovery. in general, have a look. we are indebted to this shared history as the war returns to european soil due to the fact that russia attacked ukraine all these multiple crises that our nations and our society are facing. we must once again become brothers in arms. this spirit of brotherhood will allow us to develop an agenda of

ambition and hope, an agenda of ambition of hope, how beautifully he puts it well, but that's about brotherhood in arms. i especially liked it. that is, it is, well, as it were, which means that they are fighting directly like this. yes, they are so consider that they france and the united states are fighting together , to hell with it. what kind of talk about the european economy? well, what is important is the truth, to be frank, in fact, of course, they do not fight. they supply weapons there, they provide political support. they simply do not recognize themselves as a party to the conflict. yes, they say we do not participate, for example, in a conflict. in fact , of course, they are directly involved in this conflict. and besides, they are actually the cause of this very conflict in features of the europeans, who could stop at a certain stage in general and the course of history would be completely different. but their constructive uncertainty did not allow them to do this. now, after the visit of the macron to the states, you know, but it seems to me that the americans have decided who they

really are, now the leader of europe is all germans. everything is french now. they will have leaders looking in europe will be the french. and all the dirty work, probably, will be done by the poles, and what will the burgers do? well they will work, they they work well, whoever works for himself will still have to ensure the stability of that very european economy. here, let the germans work there, and without them they will decide everything. and that's okay. why is it okay? because when the germans, so to speak, chose this no schwalt, yes, who does not have his own position, he is constantly in a state of constructive uncertainty. from it you can sculpt whatever you want. and why should he consult at all about something? well, apparently the decision was made to push through their policy through the macron through the macron will be pushed by uh within the european union of course yours. no, i'm maxim just froze me, that i interrupt all the time, so i'm already asking, it's culturally possible, if anything, maxim

asks you and they ask you, but today i usually don't and i'll ask you, if anything, so, look , he is interesting, and i think, on the contrary, you understand, and i think that pasta will not work and there will be a crushing fiasco further. why because schultz defined brilliant? you sit there, don't shine. and schultz defiantly shows how he is inside the framework that america has built for him, of course, he demonstrates this publicly. here it is including, including the words, directly, said to some problematic issue. he said so we have joe biden, let him decide, and we will adjust. this was said directly by the chancellor. here is a macron. you understand, this is the duality that maxim does not want to agree to the noise in france, now our president will go and demand pressure, he will now exert pressure on biden and the result. here is the disagreement.

yes, good, macron, will not bring french either. i agree. and there's another problem here, you know? well, i'm trying to compare, let's say the same american, yes, and macron, but she was the leader of the european union, one could deal with her. she was, maybe not always convenient, and she had some kind of her own position, but if oh, it was possible to agree on something, at least one could hope that these agreements in this or that world would be implemented with macron, a situation diametrically opposed to him, perhaps, can be easily negotiated. the only question is how to implement all this in practice, and this leaves us no chance at all, in fact, to enter into some kind of constructive dialogue about e. i think in general, in fact, this is biden's statement. you know it in an ultimatum form derogatory. i would say so. well, maybe so, but arrogance is a force. they must leave. this is the first. that is, he is already from the position of the winner,

he already declares what he must do russian federation i just reminded you. i will only remind you beforehand that in march we saw more and more food statements that the end of the dollar was at 200 and, in general, the issue was resolved. there will be nothing left of russia. it's just that i said yes, i'm not talking about this political statements i am. we understand, we're a genre, no, no, that's not even the point. i mean , what is actually thrown into the information field . yes, such a message, like there is a readiness for some kind of negotiations, but in fact there is no nationality of the negotiations. do you agree that it's the other way around? agree? here is a performance by bideno. my assessment consisted of exactly one meaning, firstly, to show who makes the decision once again to show that there is all this preliminary requirement and zelensky and his gang, when they yell about the same thing. everything is correct. this is the second task. this speech is the

third task to inspire to inspire your entire western camp that everything is fine with us inevitably. god forbid, someone thinks, and perhaps the victory of russia will immediately regret it think about this is not possible, there is no reason for this. everything is fine with us, russia putin will read three. which were specially sewn into this speech, and he specially prepared it, by the way, i will draw your attention when he spoke it, but i say, i should think about choosing words, and so on and so forth. under- under all this, because, well, the words and the question and answers contained there from my point of view were precisely verified in advance absolutely exactly agree. yes, he said, i must be i 'll try to be extreme. hmm ah, well, extremely extreme. uh, caution yes, but you know, uh, what is it for ukraine , what does this mean for ukraine today, the meeting of the macron with the biden and negotiations on the phone

with putin a. i am a pessimist and i think that these negotiations and meetings are extremely negative for ukraine a. i draw such conclusions. why do you know, dear hosts, i remember when from the tenth to the sixteenth of february of this year it was exactly the opposite, the meeting was between scholz and biden, and macron came here to russia a and we remember, and there were hopes, there were negotiations, and what it all is ended, and today yes maclan went. and that he didn’t even come here, he just called. i do not share the optimist. e maxima in this in this matter. well, he is a professional, but an international journalist, but you understand, and you can talk, you can negotiate between germany and russia, possibly from bilateral relations. perhaps, i say, perhaps yes, because there in the summary, especially from the kremlin, it was said that they

also discussed the nord stream investigation one two. well, in general, there are some relationships. i am i think it's trans to say exactly russia has fixed its position that there should be, uh, a full investigation. with the participation of russia, because they demanded because, uh, biden, i would say, biden, spoke from a position of strength. he's just in a strong position. i am there for ukraine, there is nothing good about this, there is no agreement , this is the first. so i think that there is some kind of agreement, i had hope for something second. and since there is no agreement, the war will continue. and the third thing i drew attention to is the statement after peskov. you already showed and blinkin. he also spoke today. he said that the united states of america is against getting involved in a neighbors' war in a very, very simple way. yes, what does it mean, the united states of america is against them then they are for the continuation of the war

on the territory of ukraine by the ukrainians. if i hear this, if you have not finished, you will continue, but i told you that you understood everything correctly. this is another tech running. i'll probably show you a chair, which is exactly from myself. doesn't say a single word. here, in principle, does not speak to you either one word. listen, uh, on stoltenberg. if he wins, it will give strength to authoritarian leaders, you need to use force to achieve your goals. this will make the world more dangerous. and we will all become more vulnerable, because the task of nato is to support ukraine and prevent the escalation of the war outside ukraine of this conflict. well, yes, look, and it sold out. well, according to the media and so on in one wording, the western middle nato opposes, uh, the exit of the conflict beyond the borders of ukraine, whoever says what comes out

he takes a hammer a nail, and so to each cry a head, you shower thousands of thousands, so that, well, so that there are no indefinite ones, so that you don’t hesitate, so that the topic doesn’t hesitate for me is definitely more important. this is an ongoing ride. i’ll define the word this way, but there is the orthodox church and everything that is connected around the orthodox church, and not just the ukrainian security forces, because the security service runs into it, but the national security and defense council and the meeting of the headquarters took place, and after that the president of ukraine issued a ukrainian. list well i'll say just in one word, so as not not to be. no well , let's be very, short. i will say it literally means, close to the text of the first paragraph e, to decide not to allow the activities of religious organizations that are associated with the aggressor. that is, in fact , the task of banning the ukrainian yes to the

orthodox church has been set. here's the, uh, second point. here are two, the most important i will not go on, the second is the most important. consider the validity of ownership of the property complex. what does kyiv have to do with skylava? that is, this is how the goal is selected to the kiev-pechersk lavra and not only me, i think it, but all other property. uh, the ukrainian orthodox church has ukrainian law. and zelensky signed this for me as an orthodox christian. you know this well, this is not a crime , this is a huge sin in front of me in front of all people who consider themselves orthodox christians. why is it not enough what he said? i will eliminate it all. i simply liquidate and as the liquidator i give him all the property. i beg your pardon, respected water aleksandrovich, did you wake up something, i’ll stay for you, maybe one church, but at least a brush and i’ll give the brush a cross, but i

dug these wells, and you cleaned out the water there, zelensky in general, wait, wait. you're a moment of biography no max, you understand, i tried to turn to zelensky. well, you messed up. i'm just saying what, you know? eh, the construction of any temple has patrons, there are sponsors, but there is a community that is going to make a decision to invest in what it can and builds, and now zelensky says, i’m all for him. lavra, you understand, lavra is the same for zelensky and for his entourage, and there i do apologize. there is not a single orthodox and christian there and christians. there is no this property. it's the same loot. it's the same, it's me in another city, you understand, and in every city there are temples that are this money from property, you understand. i never thought that zelensky was so satane. that's the right word used or not even in how many of us

are discussing machines rightly discussing that the goal is to achieve spiritual connection. they were just completely torn apart. this is the goal in itself, but here, when did you mention satanism? it seems to me that you are deeply right, because this is not a matter of action against the russian church, this is a matter of action against the church of the canons unconditionally, and in this sense, against the faith, this is an action against the faith and they can do this only as they say, who e- they worship a completely different enemy of the human race. and unfortunately, zelensky’s policy is supported not only by the united states, but precisely thanks to the support of the united states. this is happening in ukraine. because what i see is being done in cyprus in many other things where they have already begun to support the dog, they began to epiphany. and so on up to this point. have n't dared yet. i mean on between our neighbors.

yes, our neighbors are leaders of other churches. this is a disaster. it's simple. well, just for your experience with you or another one that i read today and, to be honest, well, i was in a hurry and somehow to physical sensations. but budanov said something. i just read this place along with the news that they are going to arrest uh hmm in the past the metropolitan of kirovograd yes to him charged and most likely arrested. but just recently, two or three weeks ago, budanov said that we had a problem with the exchange fund. and in principle, all these clergy agents are material for the exchange fund. this is said, there’s nowhere to understand, and these scumbags gathering there, in washington, where they meet there, they discuss something, and

for human rights, forget your conscience about protecting something about the fact that russia is doing something unlawfully going. by the way. it was said and clergy and parishioners the parishioners of the ukrainian orthodox church, which will be suspected of being arrested and will become an exchange fund, because ukraine does not have this exchange. foundation. they found the solution said directly, without hesitation. i want to continue this. the theme is very painful, such a religious psychological folk theme. yes, and it is necessary to put the accents specifically and, uh, do not be shy. i think the orthodox church should proclaim zelensky how officially the arrival of the antichrist is the official antichrist this person from outside point of view of orthodoxy - this is a classic

anti-stress. we must forget the name zelensky, we must simply call zelensky - this is the antichrist and the antichrist and his actions, and in fact and there, it means practically and documented. he formalized it with the devil, concluded an agreement, and he pretends to live, what he concluded here cannot be any there, you know, here, like mother there, then this is the most. uh, surname reality, there and so on, the second. who does it? at least you ate the spell. here are the new neon. you in which the antichrist is in charge, and they do, in general, you understand an abomination, an abomination, and from this point of view we must understand that this is destruction. orthodoxy, the destruction of the eradication of all the rest - this is a cooperative here , supposedly orthodox - this is just a averting eyes for averting eyes, supposedly. they also want to give such correct ones without the orthodox. but it's you half a day 's whole operation. this is one of the points that was split to destroy, so there should be such an

attitude, the second thing i wanted to say. this is macron, biden. you know about nothing. here you know, this is show-off. here is one pontovik. this is macron. you know this is a french pontovik, he’s on the air like this, it means he loves entourage and by the way, they organized it for a frenchman. he did ect arranged the luxurious curtains again there with stones there, so how should the food be framed? how are the chairs supposed to be ah? you look, lord, my god, what are they talking about there, supposedly, they came the fate of the world and no one looking, my dear spiridon looking there, lamashs spend the night there, the british sit there and control. they are not even candidates. can become like a beholder. neither germany nor france deprived them of this opportunity, so everything they did there. it's just a pat on the head that he's not too aria not too. so get angry. here, relax and enjoy. yes and. by the way, as the conversation of a schulz.

it's interesting to make such statements, and then call putin and talk about negotiations. here's a short statement, just to show. so i 'm sure that russia will not be able to keep a military victory in ukraine, we just need to understand russia we will continue to support ukraine for as long as it takes. economic financial humanitarian through the restoration of the destroyed energy infrastructure, as well as the supply of weapons. why it showed you understand maxim, because here you are talking now of the conversation, but here, by the way, is the biggest point in the retelling. yes, in the official presentation concerned. prior to this, what the supply of weapons leads to and what the support of ukraine leads to, these logicians do not understand with all due respect, he expresses his position well known, which is obtained for negotiations. with putin, i must say that, of course, russia must

win in ukraine, we will stop supporting it. well, putin is not an idiot, to communicate only with those who stroke him, he went with those with whom he is now arguing. you are arguing from the side of things. eh, there was none of this in my statements, but i understood that yes, with such initial statements. he shouldn’t, but try to communicate with he shouldn’t, it’s just that i’m not interested in negotiating with those who agree with you on 100% wait try there, probably should. and by the way, mind you, putin even picked up the phone, the conversation was agreed in advance to pick up the phone. and i know most of all, i really don't understand. look here. you have raised an important issue. i think so far. maybe he should now bring putin better. do you know what the thing we don't know? maxim maxim calm down,

calm down, please wash. no, seriously, calm down a bit funny. wait, well, please, well, it’s funny to you, but we are here maxim maxim well, you can't talk at the same time, really, you said, yes, look. look, of course , putin knows better. and, of course, the head of state makes the decision. i don't discuss at all. you come e. through an empty door, i want to tell you exactly one thing, that these are the lords who carry out the deliveries, and in this sense i return to the position that we have and it has been announced. this is yesterday's foreign minister. sergey lavrov's position is extremely tough in relation to europe, including the supply of weapons, that schultz says with which they kill russians. i would like us to remember the official statement dark. after all that says twice. here, trust me. you know that biden will call and let him pick up the phone, because the head of state has some insults

maxim and what did i say that you won’t take? i said it's still taking. but it's well, look, but at some point it may end. you understand that the village is never forever, really. here, but by the way, if you look at history the entire ukrainian crisis, what is it called? and we argued about this forbearance of the president of russia, which lasted more than eight years. in fact, even more from the moment when it all just arose, well, it deserves a separate separate, so to speak, gratitude to these efforts. if this ever ends, as you thought i put it on, it will be a disaster for everything, when the dialogue stops. this is already the path to nuclear war, which many of us are already looking forward to the dialogue should have been. yes i am he is not and there will be a dialogue, well, the blind with the deaf

, let's start with, yes, i say the dialogue again, because we have. sorry that our doors are open for conversation. this is right. i don't have to be open. well, once again i returned to yesterday 's speech by the minister of foreign affairs, who said that if you reach the conventional level. wars between nuclear powers, then this will be a step that will lead directly to nuclear war. and that would be good for them to hear. maybe our president is exactly this and daniels dashultsev, because in political theory there is, uh, the concept of a minimum consensus, even when the parties are extremely a-a, have different positions, diametrically opposed all the same . uh, what did scholz want to convey to the russian side, taking into account his uh, very manic position in uh, anti-russian

and uh, pro-ukrainian. well, he probably repeated it 100 times. uh, my thesis, which i voiced even before that, and for me, most of all, here, really the synchronism was surprised, respectively, the macron ran, uh, hold on to the handle from the byte, but at the same time, pay attention to how the biden looked with facial expression when the macron spoke about brotherhood in arms in modern france and the united states , the facial expression of the feldmar, slut keitel lately conference, when he looked at the representatives of the french army, that we were defeated, that this brother in arms to me. eh, in fact. for some reason, if the independence of the battle of new york, 1781, if ​​not for the french, america would not be independent. remember, look at the military, that to whom the british surrendered to the french, they became other historical analogues, if you catherine ii did not refuse great britain, uh, in sending the guards here, perhaps, the civil war is also possible, then the configuration

was carried out and the french expeditionary americans remember this, everyone remembers. no, no, they don't remember who surrendered to the french in the second world war in eptaune . but no, i’ll tell you again 0 point one thousandth, maybe yes colleagues suggest that the evening of historical reminiscences be considered closed, let's turn to current politics. really. uh, a very personal situation around the orthodox church in ukraine. but this is actually the final drama of de-russification that is being waged in ukraine since 1991. it’s not for nothing that zelensky, literally today , said that december 1991 is the beginning of ukraine’s independence and the creation the ukrainian nation, which you will be anti-russia, respectively, back in 2006, the then president of ukraine said. here ukraine was created, it remains to know

the ukrainians. thomas poroshenko - it was one brick to hell, respectively. well, it's true, and i don't particularly agree with crayfish. you will be too carried away by zelensky, called the antichrist. he is such a little imp, you know, but nothing more, respectively, he is in the service of the antichrist. yes, he puts cobblestones, forgot. eh, this is so much a sea of ​​blood, so much ukrainian blood, so much of the church, it may not be some kind of imp, just this is the antichrist. uh, you need to finish off this antifreeze. yes too high. appreciate zelensky in quotation marks, of course, highly unconditionally. and uh, recent events. here , in fact, the taking hostage of clerics, uh, the orthodox church. uh, church old age there is actually parishioner activists, but let's remember what conditions are in ukrainian prisons. uh, i don’t think that all of them will end up, then on the territory of russia, being exchanged there for ukrainian prisoners of war and for someone, because no human rights, which are so taken care of by this bakhron and scholts, etc., are not

observed in ukraine prisons. just not human and really. now the life of the clergy. the orthodox church in ukraine is in danger about this indeed. you need to say wherever possible. although, of course, now they are trying to extradite russia from all platforms where it is only possible to defend our position, whether it has been eaten and so on, but really now, in fact, it indicates zelensky taking hostage all the clergy and parishioners, uh, orthodox churchmen, you know, i agree with maxim of course, schultz has the right to his point of view. maxim, it may even be much more radical than what he expresses. well, there is one problem if he does not consider himself a party to the conflict. and if he wants to become certain, let's just say he plays the role of an intermediary, he may have a tougher position towards russia, but in the public sphere. he can't tell me. he 's a mediator. he wants to resolve this conflict, but it turns out that the situation is such that they provide political support for what is

happening today in ukraine, and there you see, the mood of ukrainian politicians war is a weapon of no diplomacy. we will not sit down at the negotiating table. and all this is supported by the european union, and on the other hand, he is negotiating with putin. yes, he immediately voices a position in support of ukraine and immediately wants to negotiate with putin . for example, it's hard for me to imagine. it seems to me that we in general, we have already passed in general, that stage, when it was possible, what then is said about politics to be settled diplomatically, because on today, taking into account the decisions that were made and the inclusion of these territories into russia and what is taking shape today on the battlefield, gives me reason to believe that today it is impossible to reach any kind of compromise solution, it’s impossible at all , you understand, it’s possible to freeze there, i don’t know , to suspend the conflict, but

it will be impossible to reach a settlement of this conflict at all when we are with you. yes, we are realists, the main thing is to freeze, as in the koreans this year maxim no, i it’s just that i just think that freezing means showing weakness and actually not giving an opportunity, not to ukraine. you don’t understand russia. ukraine . i don't know about freezing. all the same, i'm talking about the fact that the americans incredibly appreciate, that means, the french participation in their liberation. you know, in fact, with that total absolutely now, uh, total revision of their own history in general in the united states of america, to say that there is a majority the society of the united states of america right there uh in some kind of uh hmm means in unison, thanks to france and so on. now he is gaining. they

have a very serious gaining, uh, theory. it's 16-19 , it's called after the year that the first slave came, means in the territory of the united states of america and in general they offer to lead. it means that its history is exactly from this moment, and not at all from uh, victory yes, there by the british uh, troops and so on, that is, in general, there is a total revision regarding the founding fathers, there and so on, therefore, well, on my opinion. this is a strong, exaggerated vazelle, you had a replica, i'll say it later, then say, well then we have an advertisement, and then we already heard what vasily wanted to say. and of course, everyone else who participates in our program. forgive me, prime minister of decemberans, lugansk is the closest person to you for a long time a different life, but

you didn’t fit into it. yes, i can't talk. secrets of the investigation, season 22 from monday at 21:20 one voice is good duets, the second season premier today at 21:30 on the channel russia is advertising loan without surprises mail bank. and this is me sergey garmash i wonder what's in the box? annual with a guaranteed rate guarantee without surprises mail bank back pain sciatica pain in the joints of a proven drug,

analgesic and anti-inflammatory action of dimexide gel is your assistant. the vtb team will offer a credit card solution to the possibility of a reliable vtb bank - 200 days of purchases without interest. apply for a credit card opportunity right now at vtb.ru. switch to vtb and everything will work out it's nice to wake up on black friday, because beds, mattresses, sofas, and everything you love with a discount of up to 90% black friday in ascona only until december 4 , calcium-d3 nycomed forte, thanks to vitamin d3, calcium in the composition of the drug is absorbed better and strengthens at different stages of life health of bones, hair, nails and teeth at different stages of life. great, now fixed rate for everyone fix the loan rate at 8.9%. this is a discovery. moscow russia

a turkey baba from an ecologically clean region of russia is recommended for children new year's billion i'm even waiting for king, but i want to win now the stoloto application is playing money. every day and a half minutes, only until december 4, receive 5.000 welcome bonuses and win millions of stoloto here you are money menopause and tormented by hot flashes.

this is not for me. tame the tides of cycli mylanin melanin cycles more profitable up to 50% cyclimalanin from evalar more than 100 million prizes and your dreams come true lama and 100 million rubles. which are sure to be drawn not 4 he from the national lottery, can take you to a dream. just buy a ticket on lotu.ru and postal branches on wednesday. we have turkey kupaty. papa on thursday friday fillet of india turkey baba papa from an ecologically clean region of russia is recommended for children believe in yourself believe in your talent, believe in the power of your wings. the blue bird is a new season on sunday 18:00 on the russia channel, the bone is small, the claws are medium and the ears are huge. this is not necessary, but valeriytsev is a specialist in exotic animals

for something this building is something in between monkey parrots. and this is logical thinking, and in animals. is this really the admiral? bought a giraffe. i wanted to tell you about the horror that we experienced, the children still have not fully recovered from this. we are together, well, after all, we live in one country, this is our motherland, it needs to be protected, then the heart hurts at the moment when the last breath was wounded by the brother. i heard him exhale when they

lay there, when the soul rejoices, i want you to become my wife. this feeling, here it did not give. i'm calm here and in general fate. this is a program, who is against on channel russia 1, we continue our discussion, of course, that’s all so it was said. for understanding, it is very important to keep the big context

of what is happening in the world. that's because it was not by chance that i started there today, uh, with that introductory speech that the british delegation went to taiwan and that this is unconscious, or what does it do? well, yes, china protested. until this sieve of days. he said that they would be, so the golden era ended, now, i wonder, again, about the role of the owner. uh, again, to vasily yesterday, in my opinion, they argued. well, who decides us, as if, as if it were unknown. well, now naturally, they most liked around the ceiling on oil, as it was said, and let me remind you that the ceiling is an oil idea, the american one, which was. well, yes, thrown in order to avoid the embargo, because if the embargo is the fifth e. numbers, well, then it will be clear. uh, kapets, there will be a big increase in the market, oil prices and so on. therefore, this is the very ceiling, and there is more like against us 30 we need 60-65 dollars, we don’t want 30, it’s interesting,

high-ranking american representatives say from the united states there is confidence that the ceiling will be adopted before december 5 , the poles were against it. and why are they saying this, because there is very little time left and the markets can start to go crazy. so, the united states reports that the ceiling will be adopted, there will be no embargo. well, by the way, about the ceiling of the currency of everything else. here is another from yesterday's press conference by sergei viktorovich lovan, well, our position has already been stated by both president and deputy prime minister alexander novik, who oversees the energy sector, we will not, uh, supply oil to those countries that will go to occasion for edictators to dictate prices to the market on the part of those who for many decades defended

the freedom of the market, freedom of competition, fairness of competition, the unacceptability of any infringement of private property, the presumption of innocence. this is of course. an interesting interesting development of events is that now the seeds of a long-term process of reformatting global mechanisms have been sown, i have no doubts and there is no hope for the dollar, there is no confidence in the dollar , and the euro can also be used shenanigans teaches, considering. what kind of trick does the european union resort to when the same ursula fondled tried to justify, huh? methods that are required or laws that are required to be adopted in order to

steal the money of the russian state and russian citizens attention that very interesting changes have taken place in the foreign trade package of the currency package. uh. here, settlements in rubles are almost equal to settlements in dollars , the dollar, in my opinion, 33%, and the ruble, uh, 32, and the euro is almost equal to the yuan, and both the euro and the dollar. very much fell in all this settlement basket. well, yes, and again there are statistics. ah, trading. on the stock exchange, there is a share of transactions. uh, in dollars, the euro is also falling and it is already practically falling. m-m to the lowest levels. and what is right, and minister lavrov is that, really, the introduction of this ceiling on oil prices, it launches completely new processes, new situations. you can even say a new era in the energy market, and when no market mechanisms are no longer operating, and

here about it. they have already spoken. uh, ursulov underline talked about this a couple of months ago, that russia has only just begun for them, and they told ursu about it, that they want to make a global market, where the price is set by the buyer for both oil and gas. other oil and gas producing countries will go. carter is the same and so on. that is, here it is like this. hey, come to the market. uh, at the bazaar, usually, the price of the bazaar will be the metropolis of ecology, because what you are describing is the colonial way of trading. yes, when e beads change to clean ones completely vershki change, but pure sounds to pure black gold, and so it is, and many are already oil countries. this is starting to get real. and really it is he to counteract. that is, this is what the guardianship group does, plus yes, oil and producing

countries, but it’s not for the sake of love, uh, it’s not in a position for russia, because there will be no next ones. yesterday i studied, uh, the reports of energy operators. uh, in the united states of america, this is how it is, while biden is trying to beautifully get out of the barrgue. yes , it turns out, uh, within the framework of the green agenda for se- uh the northern and eastern states of the usa there were completely closed refineries all, that is, in january. they are already waiting in the north. in the east of the usa, a sure shutdown. eh, this never happened, but the problem. what is biden using now, uh, strategic reserves of crude oil. well, you need to recycle somewhere. that is, they, in principle, are now these energetics themselves. they say we physically will not have time to transfer energy. e from southeast to northwest. rather, from the southwest to the northeast of the united states, that is, in fact, for now. biden tried there. here steer somehow beautifully and continue to drive europe into the bottom. he has big problems. now he will be there in

the northeast, where, by the way, there are a lot of trump supporters. uh, well, about trump, god bless him, they have a different horror there, or now they are actively discussing a cold anticyclone is coming, it is now over siberia and the north. eh, just the american continent. well, by the way, for december frosts. eh, very serious. yes, that is, there are 40-50. well, we have all sorts of types 50 now, all of western and eastern siberia is covered with a giant cyclone the forecast is that within some short time it will all reach europe and drop down in america from canada to the united states and 2 weeks of december, at least 2 weeks, they predict as very, very difficult. so what about the americans. they said that a ceiling decision would be made. i didn't see i didn't see. there is no contradiction to the statement here. poland, the decision will be made within the framework. the hero is no longer the seven , there is maxim, here we bet on the facts

, agreed by the americans, they cannot be so confident talk about the eu they are also talking about the sevens, and this will be an indication for the eu. well, and there it is already clear, approximately where everything is going. why the poles are outraged, too, we can understand them for them, well, 60 is a very good price for us now, that is, unpleasant. the principle itself, but given that we are usb, i would say. yes, well, i have my own formulations, and for me it is unpleasant, because i would not be able to work out acceptable. here, well, nevertheless there will be here such and as regards the visit of the british delegation to taiwan. i don't think the chinese are on this they will succumb to the provocation, because the chinese are well aware of where the wind is blowing in relation to taiwan, the local elections and the representatives of the komendan party, who are close to beijing, won and why should the chinese now, but loosen it? the situation, at least 10 delegations will arrive after ah, and the british will also fly there,

and the lithuanians will fly there, and the poles, the chinese , prudent people, everything is not so bad in relation. taiwan is shaping up for them and i don't think they protested and i argued otherwise that america and britain yes american premier continue and continue and it will be kind of growing to provoke a crisis around this war it's in their interests of the americans. that's what i argued, then, oh, open trade. yes, as they used to say. it was great free. this is free trade. it was a big, pancake from the british side that they came up with justified so that all markets would open before, but british goods, and they were even commissioned by this sloth lord was adam's media there was written a book of national wealth, in my opinion, yes and that's when it composed they assumed that they should receive colossal profits from this, that is, from the

natives from the barbarians to the garden of eden should go, cheap gas resources, not into wood, and so on, and their goods should go back. and we when the soviet collapsed. yes, we saw it. we have from there. so our resources go there and all the junk from there to us, and how did they look at it? well, as if they were pointing with their goods. and when russia was already on its feet, everyone else began to demand that there are no comrades that are not quite like that, firstly, this is our product it costs more. what can you, means, offer us? first, we are also building an enterprise that we can process. the western world is already here, which means that it has fussed, that is, they are right. now playing against them, what should they do from me to this rule, because if the right does not let the english gentleman win. he changes this correctly, and we see here at the stage of changing these rules. uh, well, by the way , also without illusions, it was, of course, then back in the eighteenth year, especially in the xix century, that

the principle of free trade - this is the principle of the british free trade, it was discussed and even then it was clear, vasily, i'm talking about these big such strategic projects. i won't talk about ukraine two words, of course, the chairman of the committee of the supreme council on the budget of the hetmans will publish such data for the month of november, and he is crying, he is paid. why? because we collected only 42% of what we planned to collect on income tax, but the customs collected only 60% of those planned, that is. and if so take, uh, the average figure of 50% of everything on average in ukraine we collect taxes. well, taxes are all sorts of analogies, and the same 50%. this is even worse than we had there in october, respectively, if the west does not continue to help ukraine, then we simply can go further at this rate

to 45, and by the end of the year we can come to the figure that we ourselves we provide only 40%. and how will we live on, how will ukraine survive on, if, given what we said about the negotiations that are ending nothing for ukraine, the war will continue due to which ukraine will live, or people in ukraine , citizens of ukraine, will survive incomprehensibly. yes, you are asking the right question. i don't know how to watch it. see why i just don't know how to pass it? yes, in ukraine, and how to make it all a reality, because, well, it’s understandable. yes, look, the main task must be said. well , the main thing is that the conflict does not go beyond the borders of ukraine there, it continues. as long as they like, they will go beyond the borders of ukraine from such a ukrainian life. as there yes, the ukrainians will come out. here but at the same time there will still be violent mobilization, namely

violent, you understand violent. and so, how much they will leave there until the time when those who will have to die are needed, by the way, notice the panicked reaction of your government to the statement. uh, ursulas on the internet for 100,000, because everyone and the podolia arrests and someone there from the general staff were noted, well, about the fact that this is all untrue, but the european union said. in general, we will not apologize, what did they say? note that none of the political leaders of ukraine this figure. no dezoril, this means that such is true, because they arrest a person. and this was just thrown, thrown to close the hole. yes, they left to close the hole, uh arrestovich and dna so they closed it. yes, uh, in fact, ukraine is only the first step towards a big redistribution of the world and a change in the rules of world trade and a change in the world order in general

. and why wool, uh, called moscow in my opinion. this is primarily due to quietly. uh, starting cracks even in the german government. the minister of finance is already blaming. e, minister of defense lambra, that there is no transparency, there is no order . uh, to mobilize up to 500,000 military personnel is incomprehensible. but they handed over as many as seven zasylgiparts, morally, outdated which are going to be repaired in order to transfer, which in fact they want in the spring. if repaired. if ukraine still exists at that moment, uh, accordingly, but on the whole in general and indeed we see that e completely goes e, changes in structure. uh, world, just under the influence of this trigger. and here, uh, maybe it will. eh, paradise, of course, does some great compliments

to lena, i call the antichrists. this, of course, is such a small forerunner, but on the whole, on the whole, the situation really looks like that on orthodoxy at the world level in terms of forms, and something like went back in montenegro one by one, the seizure of church values ​​\u200b\u200bof the user orthodox church. broken, vodichka one acts in chernogorsk and in ukraine and other countries. i don’t understand one thing, after all , here, germany, uh, excellent technology, yes. mercedes there bmw whatever you say, yes, but, and all these rusty cheetahs need to be repaired, the guns also don’t converge like that. yes, it does not converge, they discussed that why called and so on? well, i think he called because he was agreed to a call. where needed. here. and secondly, i imagine. it 's like this a little scarfed, but in fact, in the following way. so, there i'm calling you, this is a solo show vladimirovich e. i'm calling you because biden said you should capitulate, are you there yet

? no why? well, we suck. well , do you understand this somehow? well, somehow, that 's all we have. e upside down. maybe still. here, go out there fight one said that you see the troops, and you are not going to leave ukraine. okay, i'll call you later. here. well, sorry for some realism, but at this point at the moment. the time i understand is something like this macronil salt. uh, unsuccessfully spoke for a long time on phone. well, listen, uh, bahron is also going to call after this visit. here it is important to remember one thing for me when the relationship broke down. here i have personally here literally before the beginning of the operation. macaroni came, he left putin for a long time, he spoke for a long time and left, he said a brilliant conversation took place, we have progressed so much, everything is agreed now from zelensky, fresh basta left zelensky and did not say a word and left for paris

. because she was very substantive and very accurate for today. i have everything right now, watch the program and see you soon. yevgeny rozhkov hello, main by this hour, vladimir putin called on chancellor scholz to reconsider with his eyes on the ukrainian issue the pumping of kiev with weapons crosses out vsu, today just with nato weapons they hit cafes, shops and residential buildings in donetsk as a result of what?