rybak who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio dmitry kulikov, despite state support, gas and electricity prices will rise in price for german residents by 112 and 44% , respectively, compared to last year, according to experts from the german institute for economic research. in germany, a recession has already begun, that is, a fall in the gross national product . it was reported that the british economy is also in recession trump in his social network called the democrats radical left marxists, and biden mentally retarded. there is still some constancy in the world, chinese foreign minister ivan said that russian-chinese relations are a monolith nothing can shake the cooperation of the two countries, and china will continue to resist. world

hegemony yesterday, in the moscow kremlin program, putin, the president of russia, considered it necessary to once again outline the fundamental issues that he discussed last week. they are really very important. here, see if we are approaching some very dangerous critical devil, how to retreat from it to the one that we have to do for this . this is from 2014. we have always strived to ensure that all disputes arise. uh, peaceful means were resolved through negotiations, but, unfortunately, on the other side, the other side was set up differently. eh, started, as i've said many times before. we all know how to carry out this, there are tough actions of a military nature. one way or another, we were forced to stand up for the people who live in these territories. we had to support the choice. crimeans. it all depends on the beginning started it all started with this, but we did not arrange it. state

transfer in ukraine they also started, in fact, everything is based on the policy of our geopolitical opponents aimed at pulling apart russia's historical russia into divide and rule. they have always tried to do this. uh, they are trying to do this even now, but ours is another church in the union of the russian people. couldn't we and shouldn't we have behaved as cynically and sophisticatedly as the west couldn't we have a different philosophy, a different attitude to life and to people. here, if you look at those people who are deeply immersed in moral values. e eastern christianity western christianity islam then, they have always said that we have different approaches. in general, there is rather a material approach and the definition of life on the success of the material. and we are spiritual. could not. it seems to me that these two statements and

the unification of the people, as fundamental goals, are very important. and, of course, that we have a different philosophy and the roots of this other. they go away for a thousand years. yes, in the division of churches and in all this its backstory can not be ignored, as it turned out. now it's not just something written on paper. and this is really what makes us different from the west. vadim france difference west. right now uh in the west is christmas uh. i honestly don't remember such a sad christmas break, so sad about the sad agenda that we now see and the media from everything that their politicians say. why yes, because according to their plans here. well, the end of the year already yes, by the end of the year there should not have been a program moscow kremlin putin not it should have been, in principle, vladimir putin should not have been here, we should not have been here in this studio, alexander lukashenko, the cis of the union state, russia

was drawn into these hostilities in this crisis with one goal of complete total destruction. all this failed economically, the blitz scream, the attempt to disintegrate failed, and our union state became even more monolithic, the attempt to separate failed. uh, once - somehow we saw moscow from beijing not only the statement of the minister of foreign affairs, but also the highest chinese leadership. actually. this is really a turning point, such a milestone, but the west, apart from some successes, i don’t know there at the front and in the kiev regime, which they simply exalt to the skies. it 's the only thing they cling to brag about. there is nothing special on this path, but the most important thing is what vladimir putin spoke about and what is now constantly being discussed. look how often these integration associations in the post-soviet space, we criticize them, we say that they can’t do enough

be effective, but the main thing is there now we have history here on our side. here they like to divide the story on the other side of this side. so, on our side of history , a project of the future is being born, we are talking about how we will develop, we are talking about the future of our statehood, and there we all can bend our fingers macron, bydom, even trump they drag us into the present - into the past into the present in the best case is to fix the present even trump's slogan. maga it again, that is back to some times to return to some kind of golden age. and even er, now, if we look at france, they remember some golden times of the fifth french republic, that is, none of them are satisfied with the real fifth. and they still have the fifth. i'm talking golden times of the fifth republics. if you say that the current macron is just the heyday. from the macron republic , this is the reincarnation of the degulia macron - this is the france that could afford to leave the military organization. nato macron is

the france that could do such the steps taken by the great general, who could reach out towards the soviet union. if you say that this is all macron, then i will not agree with you. it 's still the past. well, i'm in this place. although there is something you and i, of course, will talk about, but i think we will come here for the second run, but for max, i will specially show, uh, a frenchwoman. this is your topic. uh, your topic , uh, madame caret, she heads a whole institute in france, probably, yes. yes, yes, yes, yes, by the way, pineapple of russian and georgian origin. yes it knows, well interesting, right? well, i wonder what all sorts, so, well, i don’t even know, there is nostalgia for the mentioned share, of course, yes, but there is. and all sorts of fantasies, of course, they would have been 30 40 years ago and fantasies, maybe it would have worked to see. i think what

we didn't realize is that it's a bit like the peace of versailles, which was really meant to include the world. and above all, that you had to build the architecture in safety. we also did not understand that this is our european problem. this is our continent which is at stake and you can clearly see that today it is our president who is the very common house that we dreamed of, but did not have time to build. yes, it was still necessary to integrate everyone, and not just poland, not to integrate russia into europe was wrong. we needed to have a security architecture that everyone would be sure of, this is what macron said 2 days ago, and he was absolutely right, if we do not build ourselves our children or grandchildren to a terrible future faced this war that paralyze everything, but we will get out of we always

got out of the war and after that, if the present moment russia has to find other solutions than how to side with china, which is not an ally. it's just a country that suits such a game of junior very junior partners, so it's not in the interests of russia, but russia is a european country that does not want to be europe for the rest of its life, i would say. yes, i'll get it all right here. the history of russia is a movement towards europe and general de gaulle always said that we cannot stop the geographical map. that we can’t take russia and send it somewhere to another continent. it ’s interesting how many exciting revelations, it turns out, china is just a country that just has some kind of slaves or someone there, so we just found out that maxim and your intonation is very incomprehensible to me , dim, because what and years said, of course, is dankoz. this is the voice of a sensible

europe well, how so, that's mocking, and i'll explain, then just mocking, uh, they brought her words, as if it were some one saying it, i don't know danilov really deed. this is a very sound idea. uh, there are a lot of sound thoughts there, for example, that after the collapse of the soviet union, it was necessary to think about how to include it in the security system. not only poland is most normal, but also russia, and now we are all paying for the fact that the politicians of the time of that time did not think about how to include russia in this security system. it seems to me that this is about what both putin and lavrov are talking about supremacy today, you are met by journalists. that's about it, so i think if people like helen are certainly dankoz, we'll be mockingly quoting. uh, mocking. cross out the enemies. we just didn't have enough. i do

n't understand at all. or maybe i just refuse to understand this, can you explain yours to me , of course i will explain, firstly, the word mocking was used completely inappropriately. i didn't bully her. and now i am and you, with your intonation, are following her maxim maxim maxim a. you will learn to speak in turn. see, i asked you, you asked, you 're done, and you won't even tell me who i am. i will finish the part later, and to the other, if you will, and now i will be here, i will explain my position to you. i have no mockery towards this madam. not at all. i have a very specific sarcasm. so i'll tell you what sarcasm, she's. drinks. well, fictitious constructions and they think that we will be deceived again. you understand when it's respected. uh, well, probably scientists are public figures. he says that the macron suggested this. this is pure lies. i'm pure

lies, even from dear madam calmly i can't listen. they lied to us all these 30 years. you see, when you are looking for a wording, they did not find something there. well, in the decision on security, and then the past, then the next ones, so i have a different wording. she has the right to life no less than yours. and if we were discussing on grounds, then i think i would prove to you that my formulation has more grounds. they had no intention of even looking. they didn’t even have such a goal to look for common security systems, uh, together with russia and everything else, all russia’s proposals successive multiple on this occasion were rejected, or sabotaged by brazen cynical deceit, so my sarcasm in relation to what this madame said is completely justified. it is as follows dear. madam

will not be able to deceive us anymore, by the way, the main conclusions that were made at the end of this year from all our state positions and the president because of the secretary of the security council and the minister of foreign affairs. this is a key conclusion regarding negotiations and interaction with the west, do not deceive us we can go further. yes, it means, and what is your key mistake dmitry that you think that in this case you are acting as a representative of official france of anyone, as i understand from the context. do you know who this woman is? it's enough that she offered on the crown, she is today. well, wait. you taught me one by one. yes , now you gave me the floor, but do not let me finish the thought, finish it. so, uh, as far as the lenkos is concerned, she is a representative of that

same sane minority, to which is very difficult now and in france in europe as a whole. ah, declare. these are the things, therefore, when she says this, she should not be reproached for trying to somehow advertise pasta there. yes, nothing of the sort. just what she said, by the standards of today's europe and even france, where these meccas are a little more free, it's very bold and, but even if you don't like it, you don't have allies in general that are in europe you won't find sooner or later from you, even you still indians brazilians. that's the kind of people that will be turn away. thank you maximalist views, as if thank you for describing my future in the eyes of indians and brazilians. i'm very grateful to you for this, but i'll say it again, i didn't hire her lawyer there. it was they who lied to us consistently, they we them and the relationship will be. corresponding let them prove that they are not lying, but we will consider,

but she does not even act as a representative. she just acts like a frenchwoman for us. what's the difference to us? what is her connection with political circles? well, there is such a walking even, let's say the opinion that it is necessary somehow take into account the interests of russia, but the fact is that nothing really stands behind it as some kind of real intentions, and the lie is that no one was ever going to include russia in any european security system and e.g. conflict with western europe will arise not thanks to communism and the soviet union, which would allegedly inherit this conflict, but europe, represented by germany and the kaiser’s, started a war in 1914 with russia and from that moment on, russia has not entered any european security system it was envisaged together with the end, so to speak, with a concert, but the concert ended even earlier with just the remnants, then it was all

over. and since then, the question has never been asked again. oh, by the way, the american line is different. here she is. that's it, yes. and for example, here is a member of congress, mr. grim, he is not shy, nothing interferes with him. here, listen. someone will lose, how this war will end, when russia will be broken and putin will be removed without this, the war will continue ; destruction, to call for a ceasefire means to enable russia to rearm. and count again. so to win so to win the only way to win is to defeat the russian army to support the coup to remove putin and give the russians a new life. here's a caring one. well, he was going to give us life. by the way, i'm a congressman. this is power. a coup, he says, our goal is to

organize a coup, there will be no coup, there will be no victory, directly the commanding party. he, if anyone is interested, yes to me, uh, yes, this is don't relate to me. suddenly it's interesting. i will report that this is a republic? yes yes. keypart has such a wing of the hawks that spit out the democratic, this is not a discovery for anyone, in fact, it has been said many times that the republicans, when they are now drowning the budget of ukraine, they actively tried to prevent it from being accepted in this way. again, they ignored the arrival of zelensky the question is not about zelensky, not about supporting ukraine , but only about the confrontation between the democrats and the republicans, that is, the republican interesting flows to ukraine only in that parts where there is corruption in relation to biden, you can catch on and dump the byte all by no means. and you know, friends there. uh, here's russia, here's our friends in the republicans, too, are no illusions. it's clear here. no. as for the previous statement and this one,

yes, it was made from the position of the center of the universe , that's what one madame says, yes, that is, we are french, let's pretend that you believe us. let's pretend that france sets the world agenda. let's say that russia we'll give you a little security and allow you to approach versailles, and the chinese are not not the chinese, you sit there far away, because your place is very far away, you don’t need to come closer here. so well, now you just know the forecasts for this discussion. it is very important. remember such a cool term for what mikhail sergeevich gorbachev already exchanged the soviet union for. although the soviet union was still he doesn’t hear. remember, i remind you, a common european home. and when she died, in general, even pronouncing the word common european home immediately after the collapse of the soviet union, this is how only the soviet union collapsed the theme of a common european home, which is consensual and everyone agreed, and kohl agreed with gorbachev. naturally, there will be a common european home, and in

1992 this topic about a common european home suddenly ceased to exist at one moment for some reason, a generation should remember this well. we do not suffer from sclerosis. now this is such a period of revelation, or either the month of revelation or something else, when you make such statements, they are caught here, right there by the ukrainians. yes they say here comes out the cutters. well, here is a well-known rogue from lviv. yes, that is, he says, and let's say, stop hiding already. let's set the whole world to set a task, and victory over russia is here. well, enough already pri- enough to deal with appeasement there. stop talking settle. let's put the whole world together now, and he will raise, then he should approve, but this is the goal. what do you need this power in russia, let's do it like this, yes, that is, this is the call of ukraine to go there, a kuleba who says, you know, - says - russia that it is necessary to remove them from the factory, says it is not needed. she is there, so we will now initiate this story, because we are ukraine, the center of the universe, and we will accept it. yes, uncle bains, i said correctly, yes, that's what is happening

today, when there are not even legal grounds for initiating any investigations against russia, but today's funny turned out okay, kuleba. well, charles the greatest heat michel is a chic person. he speaks literally. i say i know it's impossible exclude russia from the side. no, nothing at all . well, let's start developing the mechanism. wait a second to cut accurately. it’s impossible not to, it’s impossible for him after raika was quoting the famous soviet film no, but we will still gather a circle that will solve an impossible task like creating a perpetual motion machine, how to exclude russia from the cis, he, what it is, you have nothing to do with law this information war is the same, and the european union is considering exclusion of russia from the used one, and here the right, that is, against it, when i the variant of lawlessness is proposed, yes, that is,

i remind you, when this topic continues to be raised with a special military operation, then ukraine for some reason happily says, let's generally report on february 24th. there was nothing before that, there were 150,000 groups that attacked the donbass . and from here. let's all consider all all the processes, as it were, including initiating this bet of russia, the withdrawal of russia's security council here. well this is wonderful. it's about like the statement of the french in this video. at one point, a short replica, it's not so harmless. this is not really a study of the idea of ​​exclusion of russian zones. there is an idea, uh, starting a nuclear war, because the security council is the mechanism for preventing confrontation between nuclear powers. it has a single meaning of another meaning. he no longer has the right of the century from here, because whoever has a nuclear baton must have the right of the century to ban something. let's get all my cudgel if we are we are dissolving the organization, no, not it, but

the security council with a body, which means that we are opening the doors for nuclear confrontation. that's what it is, a call to it. i agree now for a second and there are just two things for me well, kuliba, of course, here you are, denuclearization says, well, denuclearization and social security. let's take the nuclear baton. so i liked it better. until then, when he spoke. well, iran told us we don't care what kind of hypostases it takes, this cockroach said official iran we will consider. it's like stance uh ukrainian state. generally. hello yes , we jumped, by the way, i wonder if iran offered the invoice. let's hold expert commissions, and you will prove the delivery. uh, geranium nothing happened. i wonder why you have the floor, if we talk about iran specifically, the situation of relations between ukraine and iran

has worsened and become bad since the moment when the ukrainian plane was shot down and , in fact, this situation has not resolved in any way. nobody solved it or allowed it. but what concerns deliveries or not deliveries geraniums or as they are called tegers in ukraine. e already politically by political experts, otherwise this situation has worsened by the fact that and if you take the opposite, yes, let's say if iran supplies if iran really supplies, what ukraine can do ukraine does one thing ukraine complains. and on iran, the united states of america, look how bad they are. let's do something against them, the situation is bad and iran we also quarreled. unfortunately, but i would start to know dimitri since the two stories were very so good for me greetings to come back. why because for me personally, for the citizens of ukraine, the key word of the key phrase, and this year the word war was war, and war, and not just a

targeted war on the territory of ukraine. yes, which is being waged for me is a pain. for me , it's cattle. i i i was confused the first days and i. and i didn’t even know what to say at all sometimes, but this is a concrete action. and then there is the war. here is the fact itself and er madam. as you say, madam from france and this republican congressman from the usa they talked about the war, only they talked, even differently. she madame says how to get out of the war. remember the journalists, he says, well, we singled out the war, how and when the shift he simply said how to enter putin well, russia will defeat putin and so on in france there is some kind of position. how to get out of this war? that's how i won't talk about it for now, because the main thing for me, when a citizen of ukraine is the relationship between russia and the usa. maybe they are so at the event, as they seem, but i often and even your

program and you used to drink for the fact that here when zelensky was elected president. i asked a question. why doesn't putin allow women? i tortured everyone. but look what happens, we respect dmitry. today, putin will not wish biden a merry christmas and will not wish him a happy new year. this is a small action. it may be symbolic, but the symbolism is this key, if putin does not allow the canoes to be made, does not congratulate putin, but the republican businessman, says, you must dismember, you must kill. how can dialogue be impossible. and if there is no dialogue and there is no ground for dialogue, there is no soil even no one says that and how can we sit down at the negotiating table is still far away. this is generally completely disappearing, therefore, unfortunately, for me there is no way out of the war. i don’t see, i see, on the contrary, and in words and especially in actions on the contrary, to tie up a war on

both sides, as if the two sides are formally fighting, but in fact. we understand that many more parties are fighting politically. and most importantly. in the war this is the united states of america russia and so far there is not even a condition for negotiations. i'll just tell you that my position, which i have been trying to find all the time this year. and where can and how and suddenly the negotiations all broke down. it was all just my dreams, my hopes, no conversation, not even a preface to the world, unfortunately, well, i told you this before, but we continued to persist. well, uh, i'll start, as it were, with the last one with congratulations, you understand? uh, again, i live long enough just like you. i remember that in soviet times, uh, soviet leaders who were fighters for peace, as you remember, don't give a damn about western christmas no does nixon have a birthday or not? it was our christmas that didn’t care, and you know, well done caught on ours too, but i’m talking about something else. sorry, of course, maxim well, i

can also catch you, which i also know. here, don't rush. you just freeze christmas on some independence day, we did not congratulate. well, they painted. yes, but at the same time, and i remind you, at the same time i remind you that the silence of the kremlin was considered much more than anything else, there was no one with any current congratulations. whoever it is , you know? uh, 30 years ago there a little small. more precisely, to be precise there 32 years ago, we left the situation. when we lived in the paradigm of alexander ii, to the question of the past that our main allies were the armies, the fleet and the air force plus rws, and that policy and that position led to the fact that she began to tell us about the european home to us promise whatever you want. you understand us, because they perfectly understood that a gun. uh, there without approximately one and a half thousand kilotons or 3,000 kilotons.

if all this is combined at the back of the head, he is in this case, it blows out any brains, whether the smartest are american, that intellectual european, whatever, and something had to be done from this. as a result, we lived for 30 years in a situation where our armies and navies were not allies, we dispersed them, reduced them as we wanted, but in the fourteenth year, or rather, even earlier, around 2008, we suddenly became convinced. let me remind you that the current president was then, and then we had excellent relations. and it would seem that it was necessary to go further, but it turned out that that it was not necessary, it turned out that we were already turning away somewhere in the wrong direction. and we began to block all the first sanctions, let me remind you what they were introduced for. what did the first sanctions have to do with the situation in ukraine or anyone else? well , let me remind you of the magnitsky case, and the sanctions against the whole country go on and on, that is, we realized that we made a deeply profound strategic mistake, that is, the main principle of our existence in europe is to have this wonderful lady, she could

think, think and think, how to solve only one it's a huge grand army a huge navy of the strategic missile forces and everything, that, uh, all that umbrella, which is called not a very important product. what does the army and navy, in general, they do not eat bread and do not plow the sea. they create. the main thing, in fact, is a strategic product. it is called security only when a country receives a sufficient amount from its power security structure; under this, you can do whatever you want international politics. politics, whatever, when it is not there will be nothing. e, well, here, maxim mentioned today that e was and a short such conference or, for example , the approach of the minister of foreign affairs yes. and yes, it's okay. no, speech before the heads. media yes, from 12:00 to two 2:00 2:00, so i misspoke. thanks for correcting me. uh, here is

a fragment, and the economy, which we have not yet discussed, seems to be, uh, should be discussed, proceeding, by the way, even from those prefaces that i u said at the beginning of the program, look yes, it takes some time to to get rid of these fetters. e. western dollar oriented oriented functioning with the west established mechanisms for world development and servicing the world economy, it takes time to get too deeply bogged down in this system. uh, hmm, almost all countries. e for the post-war period, when these tools and mechanisms were still considered as promising and suitable for everyone, meeting the balance of interests of all states, but the process of understanding, and the risks of threats

arising from such dependence, it is very, very active, and i assure you of we will be watching soon. uh, downsizing. the west is very a serious reduction in opportunities, but to steer the world economy, as he wants and wants. he probably does not want to have to negotiate. as we have said more than once, we are not going to run for the west. they ended almost all relationships. we have someone to develop cooperation with in the economy, in the social sphere, in the cultural sphere, in the sports sphere, after all. and we will focus on those who have never let us down, and with whom we sometimes reached a very difficult compromise. but when they were reached, nobody ever nobody deceived the west, all the same vice versa. by

the way, you see, it is a confirmation of the principle that has already been definitely fixed, yes, to navigate and talk in general to build proposals with them, who does not deceive and does not fail, it is difficult to agree, but if we have agreed, let's do it. and this is certainly the priority of our policy, which will now be formed. and it seemed to me important that such an announcement was made regarding the dollar system, it was literally announced by the minister of foreign affairs, he says, in the near future somehow everything will change a lot and you will have to negotiate. well, he also spoke kindly about how, exactly, in recent months, tensions have increased in various regions and today's events. that's how the year goes by, so it ends in general. look at the events today, tensions have risen sharply in two regions at once. one of them we discuss periodically is kosovo, and

five states delivered an ultimatum, and the so-called five states united states great britain france germany italy to the serbian leadership to dismantle in a day what barricades are built there, otherwise we will support the actions of the albanians to eliminate these barricades, even if there are victims of such a text, but you understand, yes, that is, but she reported that she moved her forces to respond to the borders, but we imagine what will be nato response bad story, the second is a topic that we do not discuss here so often, but today the reinforced concrete informational occasion of the korean peninsula. ah, north korean drones, as they say in seoul, flew towards south korea, crossed or crossed. uh, we don’t know this line of demarcation, but, and the implemented ones were for an hour or two, the largest airports in south korea flew out, uh, military planes to intercept. one of them died a stormtrooper, thank god the pilots are alive, but

the stormtrooper has already been lost to power. seoul military, but they blamed it on pyongyang. i mean, there's tension. you know, by the end of the year. we are still getting it. well, how many other potentially hot spots have emerged this year or have not disappeared. we already know, that is, a laptop, that six do not leave this year left, well, i'm not guided by superstitions. i think it's not about a particular year or it's a calculus. here is the calendar. yes, but in a bad way. no, just understand, here, too, we will remember no. or maybe the next one a little more you don’t think the word live. although i am an optimist. well, i know here. well, i follow there, i have been discussing there for many years, at least for the last five years, for sure yes, that the americans have no other choice but to provoke a global conflict. and more bundles of medium small

conflicts. i've been talking about this for the last 5 years. in plain text. that's what the americans have is the only option. e actions. and so, i'm just as if i'm not surprised, but i, well, this is what should have happened. that's when the way we say, we had no choice there was no alternative. this is a normal historical situation when you are told, well, let's choose, for example, between fighting and betrayal. what do you think this alternative is. i believe that everything should be cut off at the level of the alternative. this is not an alternative to me i will not choose because of this from one and the other here. e look, first of all, here, when we talk about north and south korea. and here it is not necessary to say that this is directed only in our direction. yes, that is, this is china. in any case, here is the chinese direction, that is, next to taiwan, and light up one more point, as it were, and begin to overlay. but the alternative centers of power and russia and china are absolutely in the interests of the americans. and this is where it all happens. that is, especially

against the background of the fact that now america is well aware that the process of forming an alternative center of power is now underway, alternatives, alternatives, the center of the power of alternative americans, and that's it right now, when you need to shake up or kindle something to create not to create. and here is an incomprehensible prospect and try to infringe on your opponents when they are still, let's say, well, well, half ready, therefore, now this explains these, but igniting points. i think they are far from being the last americans to try to use in this lacquer of the time. they are very good with time. they understand very well what will happen. change with the course of this time, so they are waiting for us. unfortunately, there are a lot of different surprises and not the best ones. i think not one alternative alternative centers of power. well, i have such a question, and lavrov spoke about the dollar. but my question is why america collects dollars from all over the world for itself and what is it going to do with them? why is she accumulating such huge, and funds at home? well, wait here . you see, the question is not for a minute or

two, if yes, but two full-fledged gears for two full-fledged gears, but very just very simply you know, uh, america has a huge deficit. yes, even if these dollars are returned, they are returned. yes , it is possible to close those holes in debts that are. the bottom most primitive way is uh, well, physical. yes, the explanation for this whole thing. in general, in order to answer this question. here timothy and i once participated in several discussions in such a seminary, which were devoted to one question, where was the capitalization of russia in the nineties. this is what liquidation is. expropriation of capital, only now not out russia will expropriate it, and from europe with the post-soviet space, the americans have done the same thing that the decapitalization of the european

continent and the european economy is now doing to the europeans. this is what they are doing in marxist language, they are pulling capital out of them for themselves, so that they will come again for help by hand. well, at least maxim raised a wonderful hot topic. e, oblique, i just want to rewind a little, i'll remind you, what is the cursor and you are the current ones. this is the result of a lost war. i remember very well, i was in belgrade like, uh, tired tired. eh, guidance. uh, yugoslavia at that time still decided somehow to agree on something, you know? we agreed that six months later milosevic would go to the hague, uh, or about a year later, they agreed that the country would eventually fall apart literally six months later. again, they agreed that they dispersed the army and now it does not depend on them, absolutely. nothing even a candy wrapper under the name. uh, kosovo, which seems to be entering somewhere and not everyone recognizes this, is also over. this is about the question

the price of a lost war and what it means, believe the west and get a little tired, i repeat, if you get involved in a fight, then like in boxing, until the rounds are over, you have to fight. regarding the fact that the twenty- second year is leaving, you know, i'm afraid that it will be a long twenty-second year for us, all these tracks that were laid here are expected in the future, and about kosovo well, serbia passed. and why surrendered serbia then? and, because russia was weak, because there was no one to count on, and this is the fundamental difference between what was in ninety-ninth in 2001 and hopefully with what 's happening now. well, it's just linear so i agree. well, in that assessment. i agree, russia could not, when we are talking, by the way, about ukraine there yes, we did something there, like in ukraine, we did it, but i'll tell you honestly. i don’t represent the state on the other side, i watched everything, so to speak, in full activity. i categorically affirm almost everything that could be done then with a

minimum of mistakes, russia did, because the only thing we could do for what fight so that what happened in 1914 doesn't happen to 2004. you see, and it was absolutely a reality that 2004 would also happen. well, in 2014, if russia hadn’t done, at least what it did in the nineties in ukraine timofey the other was not. and when there was no other way, and now we, uh, are in rivne in a state of belligerence. here's another thing that we're looking at perspective. well, we are not going to lose with you, there and so on and all these words are true agreements. they don't really mean anything to us anymore. so it turns out everything will be by force, but we

also discussed this with you all, in my opinion, the twenty- first year, that forceful interaction with the west is inevitable, that all negotiations have long ended and all diplomatic possibilities and political essence. yes, it is over and inevitable. everything will be decided in a power confrontation, of course, now advertising immediately continue after it. over the past decade, this concept of conscience, which can be exchanged for well-being for luxury, has somehow become dull. i am not against it, but it should not be either or in my opinion patriotism in a word, or it has become very easy to say such a fashionable phrase. i love the country, but i don't love the state. this is such a huge country like ours. it can live without statehood, and perhaps the response to our neglect of ourselves was not the

neglect of us by the rest of the civilized world. but in order to justice has triumphed, we need a victory without a corral tv today at 23:15 on the russia channel absolutely everything for the new year with discounts up to 50% eyebrow and eyelash gel for 249 and even lanvard fragrance for 2016-24 rubles. absolutely everything for the new year 2990 pyaterochka rescues and reduces prices ozone delivers with love, discounts up to 55% on cobrita baby food and discounts on your favorite brands huggies kotex clinx. up to 50% new year's gifts in the mobile application with me with free shipping in russia sunlight is the perfect gift. and here comes our love

annoyed. yes, ice cream, green village 59.99 magnet will be lucky in the new year, attention in case of allergy poisoning and a hangover, drink a vacuum cleaner. i came to the fifth wish that a million gifts came true here. confident prices as on the internet vitex teapot with a volume of 1.7 liters for only 1190 and installments for everything scan it before paying with each purchase. we will transfer one percent. foundation, family, together

means. traveling in russia, book accommodation on the site daily.ru options for every taste at affordable prices millions of people, already found where

stay. and of course, a super-cashback of 30%. here is a virus name for a daily role. you are on a new year's dream. your ticket is not a ticket, then hurry up, buy it at nlota.ru and post offices super prize from 100 million in rbt last minute discounts. where are you a little busy? prices are sure, like on the internet a microwave oven with a volume of 20 liters for only 3.390 and installments for everything. holidays it

is impossible to resist from the meat of our own farms and natural spices, cherkizovo and it tastes so good to me in the rbt last minute discounts. where are you a little busy? sure prices like on the internet simpsor glass-ceramic hob for only 7.990 and installments on everything. to tell about the horror that we experienced , we defend together, we have one country for all, you need this feeling there. here it did not. i'm calm here and in general the fate of this year.

you fell in love with the royal bride, you went crazy little, yes, you are a horse. the most humpbacked horse december 30, son only on the russia channel probably dreaming that someone would be killed here again, what is there in someone else's garden. lady with a dog today at 21:20 on the channel russia 1 we continue our discussion. what's interesting about everything we've been discussing is

to pay attention to that incessant battle in iron helmets and paws that the united states is waging but in doing so it highlights the subject. well, let's remember what kind of americans we are, what was all this for? who are we? let's remember nobody wants to remember. but he is leading the battle. look at the element. surely, as long as zelensky speaks, there were several people who did not listen, including the mergeti from florida and lauren bobert from colorado and when they didn't stand up they didn't applaud. they learned firsthand what happens to people who dare not applaud their nbc headline. my historian had to quote for all the members who refused to applaud zelensky. we should know how we should know. why attention you reported, not to be applauded

explain came out on television, to convey to the audience the idea or watch message sources. i think one more thing i would like to ask, this is the number of members of congress almost all republicans who did not come tonight and who came we refused cotton. i would like to know why it was for two reasons, firstly, you are a civil servant, we have the right to know these things. you must tell us. if you serve in congress, what was the reason? do you love putin or are you just against democracy? or is there something else we have a right to know. we have the right to know your thoughts. you thought you were a free man capable make a decision on your own. you can love her to hate anyone to walk in a free country, but no, michael came to be able to know why? i feel so feel do you love putin why don't you applaud the man who banned

the christian denomination the man who arrests the priests carries out the plan of the monastery seizes the church declares the opposition media declares illegal political partners who oppose him abandons his. chief political opponents, why don't you do you applaud everything they say about her? the absurdity is that they describe it as the opposite of democracy. there is no democracy in ukraine, obviously a ban on the christian denomination, shut up, but he did so why such hysteria good question, and you know what i'll remind you of. now i'm looking again. and this is the exact tracing paper, who is jumping, why don't you tell me? you are a muscovite for putin why don't you clap? you putin well played out beautifully. i don't know how it will all end. how many more cows will hold out there , but according to the logic of the drama. there's something

should happen. this is not true. everything is very simple, the world was divided into white black if you do not like zelensky so everyone should draw a conclusion. this means that you love putin well, as if there are no opportunities for personal opinion on this or that issue. i would like to start with what vasiliy said here, because i want to correct him. in fact, zelensky does not complain to the americans. he actually provokes a conflict, which he, or rather, how he creates the conditions, he will form public opinion in order for the conflict to took place between the west and iran, and i see it in every speech he makes. here is every speech by zelensky. pay attention one way or another, he mentions iran. well, in general, he says directly, you need to bomb the factories there and kill people, but the problem here is that this is not the position of zelensky himself, this is a certain scenario of the west, in which zelensky is included, which should

play a certain role in this scenario. here he is, he is fulfilling it today, therefore, when we speak and often say in everyone, we must go there to conclude an agreement, a peace process, and so on. well no, he has the right to conclude the peace process today, because it is not in the script. and times it's not a foreseen scenario. zelensky has no right to do this. now about the visit, a personal sheet. i am convinced, and i generally talked about this, that this visit. uh, zelensky because the united states of america was much more important than the baiden, in fact, the baidun on the eve of the adoption of the budget there. yes, in anticipation of initiatives there, uh, which will probably be, uh, implemented in january. according to the audit of financial expenses there, and so on. the idea was what he comes in like a simple ukrainian guy who is fighting the dictatorship. there, relatively speaking, putin comes on purpose. it's in a t-shirt. he didn't just come to come in a t-shirt. oh, and he had to melt the hearts of these republicans so that they would not take

certain steps that you contradicted the interests of the biden and the democrat team and, as a result, further the patriot system for ukraine yes, which they promised to protect there, yes, and now it turns out the americans. yes of course, but first it is necessary that the ukrainians come. uh, they went to america to learn how to use this e, patriot systems, it will take six months. i just think very optimistic. they look at the situation, if they want to install this patrio system in six months, either there is another option, or it will appear earlier, but then it should appear with instructors and military men who directly americans will take part in e. the operation of this system, therefore, well , here, it seems to me, everything is very simple and in the near future for me, to be honest, here on the eve of the new year and christmas, taking into account how the situation is unfolding. this is probably the most disturbing new year's eve

i've, well, experienced in my life. going back to tucker carlson, of course, well, it's understandable why he has a huge audience in the united states of america, but he is, of course, an absolutely professional guy. i just like a journalist, i say, it works. and here he is. well, he’s like this every day and not for one hour , and it’s surprising, of course, that they can’t shut his mouth in any way. yes, it's just there so far it doesn't work. they still have it. uh, part democracy. there is, apparently in the united states of america well, either this hmm, the forces that stand behind it have some kind of opportunity, and against the background of what is happening with e, the opposite planktong. yes, just e liberal media there and so on, there is a disaster. eh yes, there is an 80% drop there in the united states of america since a few years from the same cnn uh, and uh, people somehow don’t really want to watch tuckers, uh

, they do, but you understand, uh, what he says tucker but about what is happening, they absolutely definitely noticed that it’s the one who doesn’t jump, uh, that muscovite, but you understand, there ’s something else right there, and who doesn’t clap, he refuses to help ukraine, which means you need to be punished, so putin, yes, then, it means you are against the internet, this is how it all works and literally one more phrase about the fact that you discussed the previous parts. here's what the president said, that we can't be like them. here is a very important story. in my opinion. uh, after all, uh, really. we can't any even when we try. sometimes we fail and please note. i already spoke about this in our program this morning. uh, again , it's very important for the people in russia that , uh, these are the military actions, the military

actions, the war that's going on, that it be fair. it's just a basic assumption. another thing that, by the way, all the time, uh, the information war is directed here inside us all the time trying to prove that we are wrong, that we support the aggressors. we once upon a time, books with timofey wrote that the russians were winning. making sure they're right. now, if they are convinced that they are right, then, in principle, the issue is resolved further. i, firstly, dear host, have memorized your phrase from the previous part, so that the optimist will emphasize to myself that you are an optimist. and secondly, i'll explain what it means, here, i just think that despondency is what the church tells us, it's a terrible game. in this sense, it is like a counterthesis to despondency. i'm an optimist no more met. well, nothing, but i met an article by the deputy cis of russia, mr. medvedev, and this is the national security and defense council. uh, this is necessary for the ukrainization of moscow thank you, it is clear that social science is in good hands,

belarus yes, security. yes, sorry, so i have a question. but who is collaborating with whom, uh, dmitry medvedev wrote this article, or it was you and the experts in this studio who wrote it, because there are so many phrases and so many things. uh, well, let's say i found it from what was discussed on your air, but right here are the theses, right, just like this you know, well, this digression is not a merit, there is my ether or some, but you put the question correctly. you know what this means , it means that society, society we exist, it is expressed, including through these talk shows, and that in general it is not so good with us, well, bad, that means both the second and the second. you understand that this lesson is very important, if we learned from the historical everything will be good for us, society cannot own the state, you should not understand, they are

equal. if we are here, by the way, then that this roams content from the state of society and back shows that we are slowly we feel for the important principle of this balance. that 's what's important, and make the transfer. and can i literally now, because there is just a phrase, but here is the demilitarization of ukraine. there is a phrase there. there is a function, there is a phrase further dementalization of ukraine, so if you joined, you are like an optimist, and this phrase is an optimistic scenario for the militarization of ukraine. this is where at least some part of ukraine will remain intact. or will there not be such a conclusion for himself made, but this is a question. well, maybe this one question. you understand what's the matter, not whether some part remains or some other part is important for us . this territory should not be a source of danger and mortal danger.

for us, this is what this is. what russia has always discussed is this categorical imperative requirement. and you are over 30 years old, but you did not personally choose this path. and we will be a danger to us, the americans will pay for it, and we will threaten the russians and all 30 years - it grew from such a small idea, grew, grew, grew and became a mass idea, which moves ukraine, we serve america against russia in this form, it cannot exist and will not be you. well, of course, for example, ukraine. to be honest, of course, i’m not a historian, but in the history of mankind in the newest, i’m not even that newest. and after the birth of christ, without knowing any such country that would be so, uh, an instrument in the hands of another country. i was so happy about it now, but this is honesty, what does demilitarization mean, i will explain simply in numbers, that it doesn’t take much time before

starting. uh, special military operation the ukrainian army has two and a half thousand tanks, of which 900 are there, three of them are in storage for another 500. you received about six months. at the moment, ukraine has less than 900 tanks left. this is a question of one militarization. that is, despite the fact that they are given, it means, uh, the gun of their own was there for almost 2,000 more 800. you got. at the moment, there are about a thousand left. and here and further these figures, in principle, are the same, you understand? uh, you can certainly jump and shout, but any person who in ukraine, he is connected with military affairs, he understands perfectly well that there is a drying up, you can only fight with people. eh, your wonderful bakhmud reznik, i correctly translated the word butcher in the bakhman language, he is an excellent commander, i say without irony, because he fights with the resource that he has, people are fighting cruelly recklessly, and strong-willed, as

it were, a very strong-willed person, that is, for him people mean nothing. but even he understands perfectly well that he is not an infinite resource, you know? uh, it’s impossible to constantly call on thousands of thousands of thousands to put on today’s moment with about 140,000 dead and missing, the map is now a very scary map. in general, as i understand it, someone prepared it in ukraine. how many losses in which area, these are killed, you understand? how many in what region have already died on average in the regions from 5 to 12:00 to 13,000, and most of the dead, oddly enough, this is the dnipropetrovsk region, you know where kharkov is? that is, it’s like zaporizhzhya, too, because, uh, people were taken from there most of all, you know, because they were, like, like absolutely the most russians were taken from there, you know, there is a war to the slaughter. you see russia well, you live here. you understand perfectly. for us, this is a huge pain, but we live in a different paradigm

for ukraine. this is continuous. over people it leads to the fact that the ukrainian nation is destroyed, you understand? well, they are destroying, in my opinion, the third one was leaving the peasants and now the peasants are being disposed of. the question is what will happen in a year or two after the end of the war, that's about it. after all, no one thinks that zelensky is unjust, because he gives money to america gives a lot of money and due to this we live like your country. well, vasily, two words were two words. well, in our country the state listens to society, contrary to the assertions of western propagandists , it listens in the most attentive way, the state listens to society in our country. we are not public servants soap. this is the first thing now about the applause. so everyone should applaud non- ukrainian and for ukraine they should renew the totalitarian order to applaud, that’s why it’s so punishable, and that’s why it’s so not a question of some particular political situation. yes, that is, it is not a question

that we applaud ukraine, but when the command is given to applaud everyone, no one can applaud, of course, and we had such a congress of winners in 1934, in which more than half applauded shot. so they must not have their own imperial history, they need to study someone else's our ancient rome, so that's what happens to them, who applaud on command, of course, in this mode. yes, as for the attacker carlson such universal admiration. yes? certainly personally. he deserves, but why is he allowed to speak? here it is to nature and applause everything else, and this is part of a manipulative democracy. here is the specific. tucker carlson is in such a ghetto, he says something, takes out what a lot of americans think, but he is the real decision maker. it has practically no effect. but what we see in the us congress and then a showdown about why they don’t applaud this is ukrainization is soft totalitarianism, but on everything

even against this background of this cynicism, double-dealing and duplicity, of course. i just do n’t know how to call it zelensky, you know that he came in a sweatshirt. if he came in a military uniform, there is a war, he came. this is part of a military uniform, he came in it, or for example, he does not shave, because he has no time. well, look how carefully he chooses, how it's all there, there are some same instruments, apparently, there are special ones. here, he just drive alone. it's all the same team chasing people, but slaughter these terrible numbers, about which they spoke, and the second is being promoted changes his wife's t-shirts and sweatshirts neatly. they take pictures and see how to arrange the bags against the background. uh, he rides with sand poured in, look. it's just an abomination meanness goes to bakhmut takes. there, the flag gives this pilosi in order to, as spiridon palych rightly said, in order to play along with biden in his intra- washington struggle. it's just disgusting

to the point that it can't be put into words. well, you know why they like it for the same thing, and for the same calculations, the staging was brought on purpose for sure. yes? here because you are watching. it should have been just imagine and bang. this had to be calculated. yes, for how many days you need to play , it’s clear what’s in sambas. so he didn't come . it's already obvious. yes, that is, it was somewhere at some industrial zone, for example, yes, but for sure already, as if they explained that there is simply no place in the bakhmat itself that would closely correspond to making a film. that's it, the actors must wave the flag. flag it had to wrap. you know that he will arrive there, he will hand. so here's the cornflower, to unfortunately, you understand, everything has been built, this is ukraine, people in ukraine are watching and they think that the prices are for the truth, that you are real, it is not true. nevermind, don't ask vasily

, that's the problem. you are right in ukraine, i unfortunately trust and believe zelensky today. watch the whiskey program right now and see you tomorrow. shkov, hello, the main thing at this hour. they didn’t let a group of ukrainian saboteurs through and liquidated them in the bryansk region. they had 40 kg of explosives.