biden, they relate to poland's participation in the conflict to help ukraine, the newspaper believes that poland is being considered. as a new military player and participant in the military conflict, the observer calls this a new portion of cannon fodder, one sector is stolknberg said that the alliance will accept its composition of finland and sweden, without the consent of all participants. i wonder what the consequences of this statement will be for the relationship between nato and turkey, let's see angela merkel gave a new interview and continues to insist on her minsk agreements were needed from the west only to prepare ukraine for the next war. this is another confirmation of the value of the word of a western politician, while the topic of negotiations and agreements continues to interest journalists and political scientists. here is what dmitry peskov said answering another question. about this theme. so far, there is

no peace plan for ukraine the peace plan is in quotation marks. let's start with that said, he 's at a briefing on wednesday. again, there can be no peace plan for ukraine that does not take into account today's realities with russians from russian territory the convergence of four new regions into russia, according to peskov, no pan-regulation that does not take into account each means can be accepted, this is a quote. e, dana e, through a russian newspaper. yes, here is such a quote, it sounded, the reaction has already gone to see you already. that's where the fish tells the client to leave, as if they heard something new. well, in general, so, well, we were ourselves on christmas holidays. well, i feel like now after that they will look like aids let's start, probably with the information that appeared a couple of days

back after zelensky’s arrival, ukraine regarding an agreement with poland , assuming that such an agreement exists, this means exactly one thing. the united states of america is ready for the partition of ukraine well, they are ready for the partition of ukraine under what all the talk about territorial integrity and so on, by the way, let me remind you what is really with this peace plan, about which it is being so actively imposed on us, yes, zelensky flew, the united states of america, as far as i understand, even the united states of america did not accept this peace plan, because peaceful zelensky’s plan involves the withdrawal of russian troops from all over ukraine, which the americans consider unrealistic and impossible. yes, they, for their part, insisted on returning on february 24th. well, both plans are absolutely not unacceptable for the russian federation, therefore, when they say that today there are no prerequisites at all for the fact that the peace process may not start today. tomorrow. well, they don't exist, simply by definition, because there is no way to find them.

some let's say mutually acceptable yes compromises, according to which it would be possible to at least sit down at the negotiating table and , let’s say, agree on something. therefore, in this regard, of course, the war will continue with regard to merkel, but you know, it seems to me that in general we are have not yet fully comprehended the role of europe in everything that happened in ukraine, starting from the maidan and ending with everything that we have today, because by and large sasha will discuss this here later, but i’m noticing the sword is a very important thing touched, because for some reason we forget about the maidan that preceded it. here sasha will check me and maybe, uh, we will definitely find a quote. i just remember from memory that when this whole association was moving forward. yes , and russia then told germany that this causes our very serious concern,

as it was, we need to sit down and you agree what will happen? what will be the customs procedure, because we will not be satisfied with a unilateral decision on this matter. we have a cis and a special customs regime with ukraine. it must somehow be connected with the european one, i say, waved it off and she said, it was merkel personally. yes, we didn’t need russia in our conversations with ukraine. i may be slightly mistaken here, but the meaning and energy that merkel put into this statement was struck down. that is, if you touched on the topic of association, in general the political part and association, no one had any questions, everything rested on the economic part, and by and large , if you define what happened, you know how european greed gave rise to ukrainian poverty. that's all they did, and in fact it is they did with ukraine and, by the way, they

had a chance. where from this scenario at the time of signing the guarantee for nukovic, they could take a principled position and say we signed, we guaranteed that the process would move exclusively, uh, in a political direction and not through uh, so to speak, an armed coup. and yes, i think things would change. she could have, or at least she could have been different, but they fit into that scenario and i feel like they are fully responsible for everything. what happened in ukraine and all the attempts to shift the responsibility onto someone else. it's not us. it is there that the americans are the ukrainians themselves, but in fact the role of europe in everything that happened in ukraine is the key here. i even thought a very important pavlovich, it is important that you promote it all the time. that's because especially today all these rantings and measurements. yes , see interesting situation. this is not even the method that i don’t like, if it’s business, yes, if it’s a method of simple logic, well, we signed the yanukovych agreement about and

ministers, protesting protesters that i understood, i'm sorry, i'm the creator of the test. i , the creator, said this word, then i understood raik and realized that i did it in vain. of course, the protesters. yes. uh, here, the protesters and the polish german ministers put their signatures. well, the next morning and afternoon there was a coup. after all, in principle, if it is a state way under the contract, it is clearly outwardly on one side, obviously violated on that side. well, that is, there can be no doubt that it is not violated precisely with one side. what makes responsible signed up they say you don't recognize the coup d'état. yes, everything is back, and yanukovych remains the current president, we gave him guarantees. they wouldn't just be able to , they would have to do something that wouldn't

. wait, that's another matter. sash, that's why i'm talking to merkel's reasoning here, and what before and he will get remembered, he correctly and not accidentally remembered, because the whole tangle. i tied it up there, of course, the guarantee data was destroyed in less, than 24 hours after their issuance, maxim was destroyed and i am amazed. here is what was said. i would really like to see the full stoltenberg quote. here's what he said, no, i know in this case, because he works for this program, but one of the most powerful teams that help us broadcast in a quality manner. or maybe i didn’t see something, but my instinct is battling something is not right here , because if stoltenberg suddenly saw the light he said something that for a whole year erdogan was tormented with his objections,

that he twisted the swedes like this, and i put it up for you to issue. i'm uh this in your eyeliner. i myself make up my eyeliner. i included it from my memory. well , now, probably, we will find and see, yes, if this is so, this is wonderful, of course, news for us, because it would show for now, i still doubt it. well, i would show that the table is a collective stoltenberg. ok rejects, and we'll see, because how accurate my retelling is, how accurate it is to this day the unity of nato - it was still something with than everyone believed, and even in relation to hungary, when it raised an objection to the excessive assistance to ukraine there . well, let's see, yeah, it's such a moment now eh? many people are now discussing merkel, of course, yes, this is , uh, her speech. well, interesting, but it's very

good to be a retired politician. that is, you are no longer responsible for anything. you're trying to justify your previous decisions. but in general, well, it's easy, because when it is convenient for her, she moves to the positions of today and says, well, we agreed then. you see, the result of ukraine has strengthened everything is fine. maybe in the fifteenth year nato and uh would not have been able to provide such assistance to ukraine, everything seems to be normal even but lena berkut will not criticize her. and when they completely pin her down with tough questions. from the point of view of real politics, she says, well, excuse me, but how could russia and i not agree on gas? vezhsky gas was not enough. ah, the dutch have their own problems. uh english on the shelf. and what were we to do? and also right? that is, she has an ideal, of

course, position. it's a pity that she clearly and unequivocally stated that next year there would be no way to help us all get out of this dead end next year, because maybe she would have succeeded in doing it more for her. well, on your knees, ask her to think a little differently. maybe give it, maybe give it more, give it cheaper. oh, and we will give it like this, that is, we are russians. and then who are you who gives the soul that's all of you wanted always gives. yes, in short, it’s not clear to me, i didn’t see this question exactly according to the text here. he er rai talked about the fact that er, well, darkened to all of ours. federation that they will demand more gas from us, uh, despite the fact that they behave in this way, they are deceiving. correctly. i understand, yes, even if

we can not demand anything from us. yes, you can offer us, you can ask, but since three of the four pipes of nord stream nord stream 1.2 are disabled, in general, with all your will. we can't even stas will be politely asked to satisfy it. we will gradually rebuild our china, and in the stream, so i don’t know, this is pathos. it is, of course, a very external effect, but in fact, looking at the real 2023. in general, this is not entirely true when it comes to mekel. well , you can get back a little nostalgic for her lack of it. it seems to me that it was possible to build a full-fledged respectful dialogue, taking into account her knowledge of both the russian language and our psychology, a sane bergbook. i don’t know if it will be so bred with us after obviously more difficult, but at your request, we can find it e lena birbov, where she said that wow, we

can’t do business with these people with this russia. i am almost correct, yes, in no case is it categorically possible, again, i quote it all from memory. uh, you know, about merkel, i have already said my understanding and my attitude to this. so i think that there were different phases of different states. at first, spiridon palych was absolutely right, merkel's eyes lit up in germany, europe 's eyes lit up. now we are grabbing ukraine with grabbing, you don’t understand what they are carry cheese. well, for others, from a mousetrap to a wake. this is the desire before the phrase. uh, to hell with, as victoria said and as she said well, yes, she said to hell with the truth, but i ca n’t repeat this word on the air during the day, where she sent the european union, here this phase, germany had a desire that here this is her prize, her german prize. she worked with it like that, then there was a phase of horror, when

war was actually declared against the donbass, and when everything unfolded in the fourteenth year. and i think that in this phase merkel is real i wanted the minsk agreements, and that they would be implemented in reality, because she understood that if it breaks now then, that's all with germany that now would be then and could be even stronger. well , in all the rehearsals, so to speak, and therefore she saw these minsk agreements and saving herself and germany first of all. and this is the third phase. now, when everything has taken shape, russophobic anti-russian exclusively, if you are not russophobe by origin and not and not anti-russian, then you will have problems. and so that it was not a problem. she diligently proves that she yes was anti-russian, this is the third phase. could she be useful at work? i have already discussed this with alexander,

because the topic of germany i believe that after she was forced to read the pseudo-institution on navalny's underpants, and i believe that she was forced to go out to read it. here she is after that. well, accepting this could not work as a sovereign policy. and i think she left after that. here is my version. i ca n't prove anything to her. yes, that's how i feel. and i yes, here is a burbuck quote. we must clearly understand that there can be no normal relations with this russia, like many russians. we want a peaceful, democratic russia that poses no threat to its neighbors, but we have no illusions. we disappeared. we live in a different reality. well, that's what, yes, maxim asked to be heard. yes, i want to return to ukraine about ukraine with turkish. the phrases that were voiced by the transition will move on to the hungarian phrase, the statement of the next speech of the head of hungary, orn, which is still

criticized in ukraine every day in the morning. before evenings. what urban said, he said what and he said a simple thing. he said that the united states of america is not interested in ending the war in ukraine, he said. further , if the united states stopped supplying weapons and financing ukraine, the war would end right there, such a statement was made exactly tomorrow, yes, as it were, where the mission criticizes naturalness, it makes european true officials. what is it? why does he allow himself to say such an example, the minister of hungary, you see, why does he say that at all? eh? that's not true. here he is, so further further, in my opinion, he will receive it. well, from this phrase i will come to another minister of finance of ukraine and say the position is such a person. he said, and he talked about the budget and said that next year the budget was formed in ukraine based on the fact that the war will continue. he said

that ukraine's budget would have such a deficit. the main cover for the deficit is external borrowing. and in fact, his job boils down to where to look today. e money. where to look for uh loans and so forth resources. in a word here are the two sentences. why did i introduce them into one , you understand, dear host, if there is an understanding in the world that the war will continue in ukraine, if america does not want the end of the war, if ukraine does not have to take, where does the money for life come from? naturally, i don’t have money for the war either, then i have one question, as if a citizen of ukraine to president zelensky and all political ethics. why the hell are you all holding ukrainians hostage? but if at the beginning of the military conflict, you did not want to let the ukrainians out, because because there were different reasons, allegedly ukrainians, everything will move, tick, clog the roads, and on the highway, and so on,

it will not be possible to move equipment from west to east, now everything is clear. the war is going on and next year the war will continue. we will be given loans. we will be given weapons, we will be given everything. and why in the next twenty-third year to keep the ukrainians as whom the ukrainians sold , they sell it, you understand. uh, dmitry looks like this, if zelensky is not released to the freedom of the ukrainians, look, please, if you want to want to fight. go to the army do not want to leave here, that is, to give freedom of choice to people. this is his duty, as the leader of ukraine, as a grant of the constitution for every ukrainian and the right to life the right to health. the right to rest. for the time being, i'm talking about the safety of life, health, if the state cannot provide it, because millions of people millions of people do not fight millions of people are pensioners, they, uh, live simply surviving.

why not release them, if the ukrainian authorities do not make such a decision, then it will mean that the criminal is the first zelensky's turn and the entire leadership of ukraine is a criminal before the ukrainian people. this crime will last forever. that's all. this is what it becomes from him, let me remind you, in my opinion, danilova again, if he said, yes, if i don’t leave the cities to defend, i apologize, this is shit and not an expression was pulled out. why is danilov, he is russian in himself, he is also more of a person who became a russian hater of the russophobomb e no danilov but i'm not alone. yes why does he hate himself so much? why does he hate his parents? from my ancestors, my faith, and how we will quote him, i can’t help but want to move out. i will tell you. after all, i have always advocated this line, well, i have always defended this line, and now i will say this line is very correct, you understand,

what kind of person practically, from my point of view, does not depend on the issue of blood. well, that is , the blood content of this gene there and what else is there? yes? uh, well, this is a question of the worldview of what opposes the biological body, therefore, this is danilov’s criminal nazi fascist worldview well, as far as i know, what is being discussed online, he also has a criminal past. so the military cannot do that. when they plan an operation , they first take people out, and then they decide to carry out the operation. look at the military, you smoke, the population of criminals are planning back, how did the criminal unified state examination, er, banned by the islamic state? this is exactly how ukraine does it in relations. there is no difference between what citizens were held hostage in the cities. and what kind of citizens are the hostage holders of the cities? i would like us to step back for another half an hour

, because 13 is discussing exactly initially the situation. well, it's good to listen to it too. that's interesting, how to see her after all american people. military conflict you look at the goal of russia not to defeat ukraine its goal is to create the basis for a new model of european security of the united states where the legitimate national interests of russia in relation to security in relation to ukraine will be taken into account we know what the russians want, after all, they have already proposed their draft treaty more in december last year. it is said that this is what and then they asked us to ignore it. he doesn't owe you like. let's sit down and discuss in this case, we can come to an agreement, but if you ignore us, then we will have

no choice but to resolve the issue by military means, that is, by invading ukraine, we will ignore it, but we have read, but if russia will invade, then we believed that a huge amount of sanctions. will destroy the russian economy people will take to the streets turned off vladimir putin in russia will lose this war, but we read when we thought of the russian nation as a gas station. russian energy security is now much better than western and all sanctions efforts turned against us, not the russian economy. now it is collapsing, but the european one. it feels all the effects of high price inflation, look at the us economy. russia has won not only on the economic, but also on the geopolitical field . joe biden, perhaps, as much as you want to say, is the only close relationship between the us and europe, but there is no unity in nato. well, that's interesting, i'll show the graph.

i also caught my eye, digital, the economy is, yes, we have digital giants, crazy costs. well, here's meta, which is forbidden in our country tesla amazon alphabit. nasdaq apple uh from bottom to top. i listed meta and, in my opinion, it turns out that tesla fell by 60 fucking percent. share price by 65%. the least affected is the least affected apple 26%. here are the results of the year for the american economy. well, by the way, everything is hushed up. pay attention, because in the old days. it would be the subject of a storm. yes, there was a granny so, of course, it's time to buy back these shares. no, neither in any case, because the coronavirus and then and then calmly go bankrupt. it is usually done this way. at

least in germany there is such a practice dim but about what you said in 2013. not long before all these cases, indeed, merkel is not only merkel. i even attended one of the meetings in the bundestag, where such a group met on cooperation by association. they considered not only ukraine, but also belarus and ukraine and belarus, they considered together, and a serious question. well, how is russia offering. well, as it were, we have our own customs area, it is impossible to bypass this and everyone who spoke there, starting with marie luisybek. she was such a main deputy of the bundestag from the green party at that time, but she was the main and such a punching motor of all this, she says. no, the point is not that we are against russia, but the point is simply that we cannot allow russia to make ukraine's decision dependent on its desire, so let ukraine decide for itself and here we will be with ukraine agree on what russia wants. that's when we come to an agreement with ukraine, that's when. we will talk with russia, they

were not initially going to agree on anything. they originally had an idea. here it is necessary to tear off ukraine and belarus in the same way, and they wanted to do this thing, and merkel, uh, in this is absolutely, she is absolutely not new, and even in what we are saying, now she tells her, of course, the first two goals the goal is the explicit one that i said, and you repeated it. she, of course, her miraculous memory does not want to mess with it, it is important to stay. here is such a kantsev who did all this, thought it all out, and the second one is also secret freudian thought, of course, said that she would never do it. she expects that in the end they will come running to her and say, uh, madam ex -chancellor, but get busy, after all, we can't do anything anymore. and you still somehow talked to someone there. maybe after all you will lead it and so, then she is not afraid that she will destroy her memory and say, but i didn’t want to, but you asked me and i still, i'm getting into this case, it's unlikely. look, it's possible knowing merkel knowing how she calculates all the moves. she

very often has everything built on countermovements. i will say that i will not really mean that i really want this. but she's a woman, after all. well, in general. no, you are right. this is a normal story. yes , here's a quote. e, maxim e. well, that means that it was an interview with the depa agency, on the very website of the agency of this interview. for some reason not now. yes, they could not find it, but in the retelling it sounds like this, he is absolutely sure that processortification can be completed in the twenty-third year, the stoltenberg agency reports. so he waited to understand that he did not expect him to block the ship for a long time. acceptance of new members. i see, maxim is such maxim well, let me finish. here in this interpretation , extended, but for the mountain, it still remains. i saw the news in a short interpretation, and he is absolutely sure that the process was. provoke which is on gold

actually. yes, do not read the headlines read the news read. that phrase was absolutely sure according to stoltenberg, the key one and was built around it. and then there are quotation marks, he is absolutely sure that the ratification process will be completed in a timely manner. this leads the daughter of elel, and they write the headline stoltenberg, sweden and finland will join nato in 2023. what mention of ankara do you understand? here's willy's daughter, who told the free press to my daughter. i have no complaints, but, because yes, it sounded here that no one would pay attention to two tanks and still a daughter. oh well, you write what is not will, and you have claims against him, because he will mark his summer, of course, the russian agency. where are the claims to the russian agency? by the way, how do you

not understand, the three of us are trying to give a shit about me, despite the fact that in this case maxim here you are strange. i just attacked you. you see, no, why sasha just quoted confirms what i said, that he is absolutely sure and the point and never absolutely sure that their guess will lift his veto. ok then. well, you see, here are the dolce lines indicating or the one who will change the elections. well, let's see the light. i understand that the likelihood is high. we will see a big drama there next year. yes , i will not argue with you about turkey here. well, here are the words what are the words what is worth? yes, we often interpret this as double standards. i've always taken the position of saying guys, stop already on the corns in the language of the word double standards. no, there are no double standards. more haemon, that's how he

decided, that's the way it should be this is the only standard. for some reason, i just remembered this, because i saw quotes, which belong to the year 99 nato. now they are talking about the fact that russia is destroying the infrastructure of ukraine. they say that we are not destroying the infrastructure. actually, it was bombed. let's be inhumane. here is your assistant to the general old man. there, during the briefing of the ninety-ninth year of may, unfortunately, this electric power system depends on the command of its management. if you can, really. you want him and the citizens to have electricity. he must accept the terms of nato, then we will stop this in this company will do. we will continue to attack targets that supply electricity to the army if this has consequences for the population. these are his problems. here is this invasion of electricity used against people's serbia, we turned them off forever, or is it a long time for the sake of life er, 1.6 million mowers who were expelled

from one institution was an honest damage. and not everyone will like this difference, but for me this difference is fundamentally everything the point of the standard has formed, what should anyone be indignant about? about what? by the way, if you're serious, that's without sarcasm, then of course, well, the consequences in relation to random victims. well, unfortunately there are more of them, of course, from the so-called ukrainian air defense there, but it is clearly not in favor of the americans, not to mention glory and iraq and everything else. here's another uh, so the major general, the military representative of nato, is also may 1999. this attacked power transformers in populated areas, which led to the violation of the control of the serbian troops with them simply air defense broadcasting propaganda programs. joe biden. then the same march 99th goal is

to degrade the military potential better. so much so that he can no longer impose his will on diagon, as he is doing now, the point is there are no double standards. everything has already been done. well, there is, yes, all one to one. yes, object something to the americans vasilich well, i understand that you will not object. but all those who are yelling in unison about how russia is. well, this is unbearable western and pseudonym. here are all these temples, well, let them read. these quotes will be written on their wall, nailed and read every time and everything will be fine. this is the democratic standard. well, excuse me, maxi, if i have time, i have to give it to other people, and i continue to watch with enthusiasm what they said. uh, european and american leaders in february in march about russia and the economy and the general state of affairs. and what they say now is

amazing, of course, this is metamorphosis and evolution. well, that is, if at first it was there is a ruble at 200, the economy is torn to shreds once again, then they started talking ursula fonderlein said that we don’t see how our sanctions on russia work, but they work, they work everything is bad there, you know now switched new ones. this stage here develt differed from . so, her browser wrote about what he, that is, began to study. and why do the sanctions still not work, and you know? what conclusion did he come to? actually merit? west that is, he says you you know that imports, for example, in russia were rescued by brave efficient means, uh, uh, representatives of the russian western-oriented middle class. that's what they saved, you know, uh the economy and uh, so uh

. well, in general, in western campaigns and which have now switched to work in their own states, because , unfortunately, they do not notice him enough. uh, in general, uh, immersed in the international do you understand the situation? it turns out that i would not doubt the contribution of these people. you see how you feel, it turns out. there are people who worked with western companies, but now in these circumstances they consider it necessary to work differently and for the good of the state. it makes them bile, so i'm grateful to these people, well, of course, accept the thesis that we survived only thanks to small and medium-sized businesses that will work in western markets. here is the thesis. i can't accept it. i cant. i cant to accept. here is another thesis, in fact, that is, it is clear that, of course, all people are all citizens of russia who work for the good of our country, be it the middle class. call

it medium business there, then yes, in general, all the people who are now doing business in their place, they help the country with this, i don’t argue, i’m not going to another thing that i would really like to finally have these wonderful observers, who are now looking for e how actually the west itself saved russia from the west. uh, it means that sanctions are still opened eyes. and i looked at my mistakes just like we did, probably we should do it too, because when i say, they are up to the assessment, yes, yes, they say there that we underestimated the potential of the ukrainian army to resist there, there and so on. we underestimated. uh, the ability of the west to help ukraine, probably, yes, but i would like these people to open their eyes and understand that they also underestimated the country and the people, not only the middle class, there or the businessman, in general the people of russia, its multinational people about that they did not become among themselves there

dogs and so on. and that all of them, yes, uh, went and did what needs to be done , they underestimated, in general, uh, they would open their eyes and look for the potential of russia. look, we made a mistake. it's probably not regional. uh, the country there is a gas station, which is an economy that can be torn apart. probably still. this is a different country, and it is necessary to speak to it in a different way as well. pay attention to those security proposals that russia puts forward. it seems to me that it could be moved, in general, you understand the situation inside this, for this you have to refuse. here. e, well, many people think that i'm exaggerating somehow there i'm pinching. well, here, you can even consider maxim sometimes so when i say that they have it in the ruling class. for the most part. um, well, there's a presumption that they're superhuman , superhuman people, and everyone else isn't. well, look how it's manifested. eh, in blinkin's conversation. uh, piles, uh, heads of the state department, and uh

midokiya, despite the fact that it splashed out on a newspaper on a newspaper page. this is how he should behave towards the chinese minister. yes, what china considered necessary publish? this is near the times, right here is the excerpt and what exactly and where and how far did he send, damn it, to uh, to and why? yes, because it was said there that he behaved impudently demanded and, well, he tried to achieve the humiliation of china. well, this is what they cannot do. to do this, we must abandon the concept of the western superman. so, i observe that among our experts, it means that there is such a certain part, it means that the conceptual error is the essence of this error lies in the fact that they believe that europe could negotiate. there were some people in europe merkel is there ferreinke market. it means that they themselves could not have agreed to work with them. yes, it doesn’t matter, there, i

say, at least merkel takes at least bringil, it doesn’t matter, maybe i don’t know the route there, the street or some other one, all this uh, woman is a delusion that europe could say that europe had enough peace in ukraine- then. this is a fundamental misconception. and here is this arrogant statement that we will not negotiate with this russia. sorry, i was saying 10 years ago that this is the case with this europe, people in kind. we have nothing to catch there is no sovereignty. this is a country. this is a continent not sovereign out there on these presidents are removed. like what kind of clowns, well, at least civilized there, it means, uh, somewhere well educated, where the body is generally uneducated after the decal, everything europe is over, so all these illusions that allegedly merkel wanted it to mean that for germany it was in order to to want to be sovereign there is no sovereignty in germany. we all know we

pretend it's not, so uh, we build gas pipelines thinking they'll understand, that this is everything for them, they will all understand that business is for them. this is generally a freebie. this is generally a freebie. this gas. so they must fight, for this no, they are silent like a rag. their path tore apart the gas pipeline, all a rag. why? because no. that's all you are, of course, flaming speaker. no, to be honest, far from you. so i'm not going to compete with you in this part. well, how does a person who received a historical education and are forced to deal with what the notorious soft power is, how does it work? and so on. here i will tell you my point of view. here the fact is that the whole history of both gas pipelines and uh of our trade relations with europe is from germany and france and everything else. uh, it was a very important substantial effort since the days of the soviet union to work with

the europeans. under occupation. they forgot all this there in the nineties, and in soviet times they still knew how to work with the europeans under occupation, luring them to their side and creating gas, the americans hated it. since the late sixties, it has been thought that this is? well , just now, as if the german enemies are sitting there how to destroy them all. well, they just couldn't get it. that was soft power. by the way, it developed especially in the nineties and zero and in the tenths in nord stream 2 only lost in this soft power at competitive prices in a respectful manner. uh, in a variety of trade-offs . america applied and serve. everything competes with us in soft power. america could not and used force against europe from the explosion of the

water pipe. before it means threats to the politicians of the gas pipeline before threats to the politicians. and it's a straight force, no soft straight see europeans. you probably forgot that we will remind you to swim now. yes, that's what well, that's what you need to understand, but what was the difference between the soviet and modern times the soviet union was a great empire, she could control she could date, she could do everything, just like the winner russia was the winner, and it was, on the contrary, an imitator. it is necessary to imitate in europe it is necessary to do as in europe in europe i will only tell you imitation in europe and it is necessary, as in europe it divorced not under yeltsin 20 years earlier inside the great soviet empire. and if we ignore this, let's turn around again, i want to tell you that yes, he was actually a manifestation of hard power on the part of the americans and their goal was one to minimize the influence of both europe and russia on

ukraine on ukraine and the ukrainian political ritu i'll tell you more. well, let's remember the words, yes, how she sent to hell, as dima said, and the europeans. and how they appointed the same poroshenko or yatsenyuk. it’s just that many have already forgotten yatsenyuk’s party in general, the people’s front, which took first place in the elections more than 21%, she was knocked together in 3 months on her knee. it's just that for 3 months this did not prevent her from taking first place. and why did this happen, because the americans also didn’t know ukraine well. they expected that let’s install poroshenko. how are you holding back, or is there an alternative force between which we will play in ukraine ? in fact, they understood what they were doing and did not take into account the positions of the europeans. i am convinced that the europeans after, as dima said, there was a stage when they wanted to implement the minsk agreements, to them. it was necessary and important why because the

conflict took place on the territory of europe and it is important for them to show their role in resolving this conflict. just through their ability the americans once again. they were humiliated and shown their place in uh in signing the guarantee policy to yanukovych and then signing the minsk agreements. that's because merkel went to implement them. i am convinced of this. it doesn't justify her. it 's just my historical and political assessment and that's it. well, from history to the present to what is and what will probably be next year. i would now return to what the scottator said about russia's goals in this story, and it is clear that now everything will be decided. not at no negotiating table. no, really. as long as there are no preconditions for that there are some compromises and it is possible to agree on something, everything will be decided on the ground. everything will be decided in the course of hostilities. that's what you need to be

ready for, this is what you need to be ready for. our the economy must be ready, the people must be ready, including, uh, our information policy, and so on, and we should be absolutely aware of this. and it is clear that every person, and i am no exception, of course, would like to see all this over as soon as possible, and we would enter the twenty-third year there already as a year of peace, but it is quite obvious that this will not work. and in order for it to be necessary, it is needed. uh, well, i won’t say, there, some kind of deafening victory yes, there and uh, but uh, obvious successes on the uh, battlefield. and only this will make it possible to bring peace closer. eh, this is reality, here, with which i would argue with you. and in general, this is the point of view , it is so now. the anti prevails decision is made by the policy. there is no need to shift problems to politicians. uh, the politicians on the military the military perform the role of politicians, it is the

politicians who decide to start a war or not to end it, it is the politicians who have to decide to plant a hundred negotiations. i just sit down, so you get them right. only i didn't understand. what is the objection on the battlefield. i'm what are they for? yes, i can’t decide everything on the battlefield. well, uh, yes, you see, well, you can't ignore circumstances all the time. here, starting from the maidan near slavuta, in detail. yes, i'm talking about what you see, what i said. i heard what you said, i'm not even arguing with you. i'm just deciphering. don't be offended. i hear you say what you said. rita ritter speaks consistently ignoring. all processor stages and all russian proposals at all stages made this situation inevitable. and this is our fault. says ritter we are consistent. he has not yet touched on the maidan, but we discussed there aidan how to

follow from there, you always need to keep the context. you are right on the diagram. i'm not arguing with you here, but understand the context longer, it's like i'm arguing one thing in a shed. the only thing, i say ike, understand in the logic of the historical action of the soviet union on the gas pipe deal and the decision on the peaceful coexistence of systems and europe as a priority is no different from what the russian federation did in the 1990s and 1990s. zero years in relation to europe, logically absolutely nothing, the decision was made before long before the russian federation nomenklatura and the central committee of the cpsu was adopted and implemented. if you will understand, if you will not recognize this truth, you will slide on the next step . i do not argue about this, but our troops were in eastern europe, we could afford it. and today we cannot

afford such a luxury, because we are already the border, damn it, and the baltic states and ukraine have ceded everything. what happened? yes, gave up, such as i'm sorry but you are such straight warriors. i you my friends it does not conduct. this is all without any clarity. here. now look here, if you say you gave up on the word, but i am categorically against it and i can justify that no one gave up the process was more difficult. well, if you gave up, then please attribute it to the nomenklatura. and as kps is absolutely free your terminology has given up. she waited for them, you know absolutely. well, no one , they are not only green, strong special services. you have a bad knowledge of all the secret services are included on tch nomenclature included advertising agree.

wonderful, strikingly brilliant, ivan vasilievich changes his profession on december 31 on the eyelash channel for 249 and even the aroma of new year's gifts break in the mobile application. chernogolovka drinks 99.90 pyaterochka helps out and prices are reduced medicine and

health products, you will find on health, for example, baralgin for severe pain or haratka baralgin and other medicines on health, 10% discount on the first order of paint applications, how crumble ask in stores in your city, drawing more than two billion, russian lotto, very close. believe in the miracle of the new year's billion. waiting for you on the site of branded stores and convenience stores . more scan it before paying with each purchase. we will transfer one percent of the fund to the family together. beauty gift cards

life is worth looking at from a normal angle, so zero is the best degree for life. what do you use to securely fix dentures, only locoludfix prosthesis is comfortable to wear and easy to remove, fixing cream for full partial dentures. apply cream dots for secure fixation and fit. choose lokalut fix cream for reliable fixation of dentures as soon as possible. rather, i came to five desire. something came true. here, a million gifts were being prepared pyaterochka rescues and rescues gifts.

they eat only grains. never uses and never will use hormones. it is impossible to resist the meat of our own farms and natural spices, cherkizovo and it tastes so good to me. in the loop all the crusts perfectionists eat only grain feed never use growth hormones and harmful additives. yes, these are high standards of eyelet eyelet

pure products no harmful additives sacrifice.

a few hours before the new year, we decided to make a popular hit parade 2022. you keep looking in the wrong place to make friends with whites. cherry music to the lord with all my heart andrey malakhov's new year's show on december 31 is watched from 18:00 until the president's address only on the channel, russia faster to the tree at 21:20. this is

a program, who is against on channel russia 1, we continue our discussion alexander sosnovsky is looking at me like that gloomy. no, i’m just the opposite, i’m looking cheerfully, because i heard peskov’s words that there won’t be any peaceful negotiations, there really won’t be, but there is such a wonderful phrase. it talks about four regions. yes, that is, there is no crimea at all in these you do not consider. but they want something completely different. yes , and the new ones are talking about new regions, peskov on purpose, but this is very important, but this has already been noticed and understands, of course, that this is not just some kind of throw. this is an absolutely clear position, there will be no negotiations. now, if this position, crimea is not considered at all, as it was. and this opposition today should be considered in the west, as indeed the position of russia, which is simply impossible to change, therefore, all talk is at the talks. they are empty. here i would remind you that crimea was also taken out of brackets and even in the

notorious minsk agreements. it's just never been considered. here russia has never allowed to even start a conversation, so about it. well, this is exactly what zelensky is all about time hurts, and i want to be different. oh well, here they touched on poland in the first part. here, well, as a symptomatology, yes, because there is the process itself, em abscess, or there is sometimes, yes, and there is its symptomatology. here is the symptomatology right by all polish, look here. stop ukrainization of poland speaker people are fleeing the war from russian barbarism to moscow to moscow to moscow this is a punch. here is the speaker of the polish parliament to a deputy who only said that he did not consider it possible. you must

stop the ukrainization of poland, you, right let's say she accompanied him from the podium with shouts to moscow to moscow, she studied classics well at school, but there were options, saratov grandmothers. well, that is, if, according to the classics, moscow is chekhov yes, it is unlikely that she is purely chekhov. well, yes, look how old she is now then and at the school of a friend, so to speak, you can joke. it allows this situation. i agree, but i would still see the joke here, and that's a very interesting fact. this is the parliament of a european country that considers itself superior to all other european countries in everything. and, of course, of course, democracy and that's all to imagine. you want something like this to happen somewhere. well, for example, even earlier somehow. well, it's probably difficult,

but no one notices it happens. but i got it on social media. i showed. and so, in principle, for europe to accompany the cry of the outgoing deputy to moscow, indicating that, probably, the agent with such a phrase. well, that's okay. it 's democratic. well actually. eh, there is already a certain plus here that this deputy was already able to come out and at least say one phrase, because after all, in the spring there was no such thing since, and all the votes that did not coincide with the official line. uh, jammed very hard, especially on the parliamentary platform. and here it’s interesting that this one i don’t know what to call it, poland ukraine yes, it’s also very complex and historical, and the volyn massacre and a lot of other things, and uh, it’s periodically clear that the main body of polish ukrainian refugees went to poland yes, well, someone then went further to germany, but someone, i, many remained in poland, and

poland helped them. it must be given credit that is, the poles here behaved in this regard, er, hospitable and so on, but i noticed that already somewhere from the end of spring to the beginning of summer , the same kind of things began to appear in the polish press in polish social networks. why, uh, maybe not so radically not to stop. uh, ukrainization, poland well, the fact that the ukrainians sit on the neck. yes, they are refugees. yes, they are without everything. yes, you need to help, but as they say, you need to know the honor. this is what the very first germans began to voice in poland. very afraid to voice these things. they are almost never there. sound, and the poles are completely open. that's interesting. and i would not be surprised at this behavior and this case absolutely in any way. we have all been talking about the ukrainization of european, and even american, politics for a long time,

and one of the elements of this ukrainization of politics, not only in ukraine, throughout the world, is russophobia, which is rabid and bordering on idiocy . and you will remember, how did the ukrainization in ukraine begin with a suitcase railway station russia to moscow to moscow e what they say now in america about putin's imitation of prices will be putin's inflation and that's it. than it different from excuse me to moscow to moscow to moscow and in poland the same thing is happening. the person said the absolute truth ukrainization ukrainization and immediately received confirmation of his words. this is the first point that i want to say, and in another e that we are now arguing about when ours will end, and what happens. now this burning of everything will happen. you happen to be burning out everything russian, everything that is in ukraine, we are now talking to you, and at this time in odessa. at this time, they have now

arrived and are destroying the monument to catherine the second, which stands, which justifiably founded this city and which was one of the symbols. the next, apparently, is duke. where did you decide which one we are talking with you right now, but are we at war? i hope, uh, how they restored uh, at this time danilov is saying that he is returning again uh is returning to translating the ukrainian language into latin, because in his opinion. this , together with phonetic changes, will definitely push the language out of the russian e world, that is, we can come to ukraine in a year, but there is nothing there, there is no communication at all, like said in one of the programs. there is no connector to communicate. i wouldn't worry about it. here are those who want to communicate, yes, and about the latin alphabet, well, yes, theoretically it will move away from russian, but where he can make such a decision. this

will just be appropriate in relation to the fact that it will be a voivodeship. uh, the polish republic so you will, yes, here is the voivodship in the polish republic, the translation into latin is absolutely appropriate. therefore, i would say that danilov is preparing for this, but you are an expert on them. he really understands this subtly. here, i would say that in general this is the story with the speaker of the polish parliament. she is not accidental in this sense, because she tells him, shut up is impossible. now it is to tell us to come there again. i'm not careful to meet. and you got out here on the podium, then we'll deal with the ukraine zation, because the principle of the upoles is exactly the same as filatov declared in relation to the russians now. everything is everything to them, and we will hang, then i am very mistaken. no, not much. unfortunately, you know, it flooded over me, because when he says to moscow, moscow there you can to live, and ended with this, yes, there were

extreme elections in kiev and they elected kiev, uh, the mayor of the city of kiev in one and discussions, well, discussion. i am an expert. i am in front of me. eh, also a representative of the authorities. he means expert in one of the ukrainian studios. i tell him. you understand, you brought kiev to ruins. you look, well, i criticize and direct criticism. i’m telling you to take an example, for example, you know moscow, how many metro stations have been built there. that was a few years ago, do you know how long the subway is? here he is, firstly, he is a deputy. if this is an official, and he says these moscow people that you are speaking here, that you are criticizing me, i should not obey you. let's go to moscow. i was shocked. you see, that is, why i felt it on myself, and you, that is, the suitcase, the station, this is it. zelensky’s power already existed. donbass, zelensky personally said this, please. well,

if you please, please leave. this is a disaster. you understand when the poles, polish the authorities, the ukrainian authorities, say, take it all , and what are they thinking about, do they really not think about one thing, that people may leave, perhaps, perhaps they are thinking, they will take up arms and drive them out. what will this lead to , do you understand? what will this lead to if in poland now they have such russophobia for a long time? yes, but these two things united the ukrainian authorities and the polish authorities with hatred for their people. first of all, where are they driving? where should the ukrainians rot, you know? well, in principle, not by chance in a turkish newspaper. here it was all written that the poles are next in the american plan. as cannon fodder, but we discussed it neatly from different angles. well, uh, the turkish newspaper took it and wrote and well, they believe that exactly this was the subject of conversation between zelensky and biden. well

, let it be on their conscience briefly, maxim, according to the previous one, i wanted to speak. here's what jamie shea has to say about 1999 , the bombings of the grid - energy facilities. here, what is the fundamental difference between that situation by the americans and the current they don't give a damn about us. what does misha have if clark does not regret, e bombed, yes, here, uh, remember, uh, what we are burning simonyan said. yes, like here, i'm sorry. that's what you said margarita well said brilliant. well, this week i told putin on sunday, he said this. we have a different philosophy, enough of this word. sorry. yes, yes, but just now , of course, little depends on me, but i pray to god that it doesn’t happen. new bombings before the new year, at least so that the ukrainians whom i contact normally spent ah. mm. these are the remaining 4 days, because one more wish, say that yes, there will be shelling in donetsk

. they don't listen to me. uh, god hears something, uh. i believe that the shootings of donetsk by lugansk in general for 8 years should not have been this monstrous speech, but in this case, this is simply how we differ from the americans when you call friends and girlfriends there in kiev they don’t reproach you for anything, they know that you know from moscow but of course, now this night. i brought in saints under two i didn’t warm the dogs with blankets. i so want to meet, but the new year is at least with electricity in the heat. god forbid, then, of course, all this will resume in january. here, in order for them to meet the new year of kiev normally, this is despite the fact that i, uh, consider ukrainians to be a different people and absolutely, but it’s still a soul. so we know that i have been saying for a long time that the american created the shahid geopolitical belt, this train includes ukraine-poland, the task of poland is to make it so that without applying the fifth paragraph of the article, the

nato charter, to drag the war into this meat grinder ukrainian americans need to do this and finish it off and say, if the poles are ready to die, and please, we are for you such conditions for creating the first go. go to kiev, they have already brought their troops there. volunteer then, come on let's divisions there, because they don't want the system to fall apart. uh, the infrastructure of poland and ukraine please, there you can die and fall apart in this direction. yes, well, that's interesting, interesting, of course, the circumstance. and, by the way, notice that here is a discussion of the collision in poland with us poland emerged in our country back in march , and so on. it was discussed, yes, then, well, maybe it seemed that we were somehow exaggerating, fantasizing, and so on was written, and fantasized, yes, but if we wrote in march since march, we had something to rely on, thanks, vigilant professor. are you sure you capture everything ? uh, thanks, colleagues, that

's all for today, watch the whiskey program right now and see you tomorrow. prevented a terrorist attack, which was prepared by the ukrainian special services in kabardino-balkaria, the universitarians had a whole arsenal of weapons and bomb. donetsk again under fire in the last hour, four arrivals from the ukrainian american