excuse me. good morning. well, arseniy. i will examine you now and check your reflexes to assess your condition after the operation. very good. how

to fix it all? we will now go to the ct scan and everything will be fine. okay okay, don't worry.

fasten your seat belt tomorrow tomorrow. who needs to return to the airport urgently? this is a huge risk. paternal continuation watch tomorrow at 21:20 on the russia channel today there was a very important meeting with the leadership of the armed forces of the russian federation

, which was held by the minister of defense, general army hero of russia sergei shoigu analysis, if the systematization of the experience of the actions of our groupings of personnel and plans for the supply of military equipment is the main guarantor of our immediate plans for expanding the arsenal in

modern shock weapons is no less important task in the shortest possible time to finalize the equipment and tactical equipment of personnel to the highest level. everything that a fighter needs should be modern , comfortable and reliable. we need to improve the communication management system. to this end, we will actively use artificial intelligence technology in the near future it is necessary to modernize the work of military commissariats, it is necessary to digitize databases, establish interaction with local regional authorities, and also update the system of civil and territorial defense organization by industry. we will also improve the mechanisms for responding to civil initiatives, some of which certainly deserve more attention. solving these and other tasks will make it possible to build up the combat capabilities of the armed forces to ensure

deterring aggression against russia this shows what we are considering. what is the army? analyzes experience does not try to engage in embellishment. and what is very important is that the leadership of the ministry of defense hears the voice of a fighter and all the necessary mechanisms have been created to ensure that information is received as quickly as possible, accumulated, processed, goes to industry. and what is being developed in the industry turned out to be at the front as quickly as possible, this is such an example they will give with the guys who sew.

and now 150 thousand sets of perfect new equipment for special operations forces, because it has been working for 10 months. and for the west there are no rules for fighting us to crush us. they have violated their own so-called democratic principles a hundred times already. now it’s not even clear what it is now they are shouting that ukraine should receive all the necessary weapons, even the ones that some western politicians didn’t even want to talk about a few months ago, leaving their autographs on bombs and tanks with pleasure. here's how, for example, this half-wit from the czech republic, peter fiala.

moreover, the vulgarity is that he signs on one of the tanks, well, the soviet period of work, that is, this is how it should be betrayed, after all, this fascist past. it ’s how many of us tried to invent a history of anti-fascism for them, but still, the true hari just dumb as a brave defender of ukraine , he writes. yes, the brave defenders of real ukraine fight as part of the first second corps in the days r lnr. here they are protecting the real ukraine from the nazi sailor who captured this thieves' country. and so they rejoice, they want to kill russian the soldiers believe that this is right and necessary, as some idiot from finland stated in addition to weapons. the entrance is coming, ideology, total russophobia leads not only to europeans, we are our bastard coward and fugitives of the main goal, no one will hide this

destruction of russian statehood in all possible ways. i really liked the electricity that you wrote about how we should break approaches and stereotypes. i was surprised when a discussion began with the respected senator klim. to be honest, i didn't understand. what exactly outraged the lord because when one of the fathers of the amendments to the constitution said that everyone must abide by constitutionality. i would like to remind you that only recently we did not go through an amendment to the constitution on the basis of wartime. if necessary, i want to remind you that we are not for the constitution. laws for us, they must correspond to real time. today i spoke with very respected people. there are eminent experts in the field of law and they speak in particular. here is the question, which is , and the frontline zone. what right should act if you talk to people at the front for them to solve problems. rather, you need to return to the steam of the times of the great

patriotic war to change the rules of them . , like me, what needs to be done for victory, we need to win, we need to win, relying on our unshakable values ​​of the idea of ​​good and evil, understanding who opposes us, while clearly realizing that this is not an easy, if you like, civilizational task. this is to the question of rules. to be honest, i was very surprised by the reaction that this mine caused. in general, in my opinion , a completely trivial post about the fact that do not play with a cheater, because you will lose. you never make rules. well, this logic is known. i just translated it into the language of today and was a little

surprised that it was tied up, it turns out from the constitution that when i say, you don’t have to speak according to the rules, then i understandably mean the rules that are imposed on us from the outside, by no means those rules which we ourselves are for myself. eating including the constitution must be violated, the law. of course not. and in itself this idea is very trivial. moreover, i will tell you that after all, we are not the first time in history. eh, we face this idea ourselves. we have already solved it, and in a purely legal way. i wrote a dissertation on the theory of proletarian socialist internationalism, which in the sixties in the west was called the brezhnev doctrine. and the meaning was very simple, we are talking about the fact that we accept international rules we said that we adhere to the rules that are fixed by the mouth, it is all the treaties and conventions that we

support accept. for example, we were members of the international civil aviation organization already in 1970, and it’s called, i didn’t start on purpose before the broadcast, it was useful to look at the motivation that we gave ourselves when joining this organization is very interesting, the motivation there is mainly related to the fact that we accept these rules, which uh hmm how this organization adheres to in order to ensure for the unhindered use of our civil aviation on the territory of those countries that are members of this organization. hello today. means to us today after known events have begun. means on privav on all uh, the known rules of this organization are a member of which we continue to remain. so they cut down all kinds of flights through themselves through the territory of european countries. this is to the question that we are, as it were, part of this

large community, but it is not a fact that they will offer us exactly the rules according to which it is convenient for us to live today like this, i return to this idea, and then we told the entire world community and the most parasitic thing was that it was by default. niyu accepted that inside the councils of economic mutual assistance within the world system of socialism within the warsaw pact, in addition to international law, the principle of socialist internationalism operates, which implies the first, second, third, fourth, fifth. and it was precisely our then understanding of the rules by which we play. and on which we do not play, because it is contradicts our interesting rules and why we can’t deprive the scum of russian citizenship, and there is a direct ban in the constitution which is about what the constitution directly says here, as if without any reservation, stop the constitution

directly says that they took to sew russian citizenship, but in the constitution i specifically studied this issue, i was interested in specialists that this form is from the constitution that a person can return there without hindrance return is written like that, but in the russian free to leave and free to return. so there is an article in the constitution. i do not understand otherwise. well that's what says i hate your russia take away your passport. and we tell him, no, dear, if he voluntarily leaves, there is such a procedure, another matter. well, here they are, let me explain now. and if he de facto took a second citizenship, this is inadequately not the same as he is not forbidden from us to have a second civil, he has the right. now now now we're not banned. this is clearly a kiss, to whom we were handing out here back passports and what did the bandera people and their support receive in soviet times, who were taken away, then they returned and who a number of worthy people, and put a number of samples. no. so,

just what i wanted to do, i just really don’t understand, so people are telling us to spit on your country. we get citizenship of other countries. our elections are good, but the war has begun. they are fighting on neither side. i don’t wake up every morning, which means that even or even money, they wear different uniforms, then our nato one. i just want wanted uh, that's the thought uh, emphasize you know, that's very rightly said that that's what should determine the legal system, including within the country and the rules of the international order. it is clear that we can play by the rules that are being imposed on us and that are really quite often violated there, well, countless times, but we proceed from our legal systems that the external situation is the situation in which the country finds itself. it does not affect the legal system. we should not change the legal system to suit the situation. in my opinion smooth. this is how we should act and in this sense. for example, i am a supporter of touching the constitution as carefully as possible and even more so,

we recently introduced a large number of amendments to it there, held a referendum very little, touched it, as if the article that owns the article that we are talking about refers to the head of the second a constitution that cannot be changed by decisions of the duma of the federation council, it can only be changed by a referendum and a decision of the constitutional assembly. so you think she got a referendum now, and deprivation. citizenship the return of the death penalty 20 will certainly support such a tactless question. i had it all the time , but these are the parts that cannot be changed. and that moses endured they are engraved on the tablets of stone shahrai, of course, we say so directly that these are people sitting. vladimirovich said a second. i suggested that the full, in accordance with the constitution

, suspend the right of entry by court order. and then it hit me. means that i'm calling something not to uh, yes, yes, means overthrow of dreams. e state system. well my friends. well, really, if we turn to the people and ask, but those characters who today say that they are going to turn russia into radioactive ashes and have russian citizens. we are correct, i understand correctly. according to the current legislation, this citizen will come to the border tomorrow and show his russian passport, they will let him into the country, and so they come here. after all that he said, he will go out to the arbat and bring a single picket there, and then he will go bang, so a glass of uh, champagne for the victory vsu, and we'll talk guys. well , a tv show, because for the sake of democracy,

everyone must give the floor to someone. yes, not melokhina was brought to the corporate. yes, in this case, i'm talking about those characters who have long been known at the border were not arrested. no, everything is fine. i'm talking about this. so, maybe things would be waiting for you, that is, they say. of course you are all coming back. well, to know what they did. i think, not a hooligan, and called domestic names in this case, the motherland e. as i understand it, in relation to raspberries a criminal case was initiated not on incomplete or hooliganism, but precisely this act, which falls under such articles as undermining the constitutional order, well, lawyers would better say how it looks in other words, my friends, i imagine the situation as follows, that today the time has come when we need to completely subordinate both foreign policy and domestic policy to the tasks that bailiffs are facing today, moreover, when we say that we are going to change the rules. i want to draw your attention. what generally speaking, like me

i'm wrong. but i think not, generally speaking, my main goal is, in addition to what is said in ukraine, that in addition to genocification and so on, what concerns ukraine. but the most important task is to change the world, the world that brought to today's conflict in ukraine, it is by its nature a conflict for us, it creates a situation where we are constantly under threat. an external enemy and ukraine was created, as anti-russians, exactly to deprive this task of wanting to change the world around us without changing own society, that's what i'm talking about. i don't understand this at all. and when i hear, mister, zorkin or a citizen, i don't know correctly, that is, i'm heading to the constitutional court. i just don't really understand what he's talking about, he's citing norms that are all wonderfully related to time, which has nothing to do with today. he's wonderful. i treat the constitution with

tremendous respect, but you are orthodox people, i am jews. yes, you are orthodox people, not catholics with us, what is the pope of rome or what? what is it for us at all is she like that? that is, this cannot be discussed, then it cannot be discussed. yes, it seems much easier to me. find a solution without touching the constitution it is. why there are a million opportunities to solve any problem. no, it is well written in the constitution no, of course, it is correct. and if the constitution, then what, it turns out, is a kind of gray zone, i think that if it can be undermined under some norms of the constitution, there is no violation of the institution, as you know, since you have not signed the bible, the constitution does not close all questions, the constitution - it's a living thing a certain substance that must meet the aspirations of the people at a certain historical stage and must

provide the legislative basis for the prosperity and survival of the country. they should also serve as an obstacle when speech suddenly begins to juggle with certain articles of the constitution, the basic question arises: are you a letter or a spirit? what that existed in russia. and if the constitution begins to work in the interests of people who hate russia, when some interpretations of the constitution are, let's say, softer. i still remain to my point of view that it is quite possible today for the legislator in the duma to the council of the federation to find a legislative solution to all those issues that are related to today's challenge, right. therefore, i’m just going to what the constitution is perfectly well aware of in irkutsk, and what? court investigation 9 months, yes, even by a court decision, it must be drawn. yes, this martial law

suggests the possibility of others. yes , the constitution that the draft says that martial law? yes, which gives what, and then it should be written in the law, but it is not registered with us today about martial law, that we have penal battalions. no, we certainly do, but we don't. we don't have compliance. that's good. but this is just the question of what we now correct the current legislation for the tasks that we are facing. or maybe i will ask such a question in general, to which, probably, there is no answer. but when our rocket into a mobile phone in the hands of mr. dudayev hit this terrible decision. and if, when it turns out that today in the textbooks the special service described the story of the poisoning of the master as an international terrorist, khatab, how is that ? but in my opinion. this is a completely legal action subject. under the norms of wartime , i’ll say it easier, i mean that daria dugina is not about how hay is not a violation of

the constitution well, together it’s not constitutional, so to speak, why justice should take place justice should be found and executed and where it’s impossible for us to execute, yes that why not we don't have. you never know, based on this loki testifies, it turns out there is a sniper, that is, each, so snipers need crap. look at them , how many she killed, or something, criminal cases initiate an order. what order is quietly our constitution of direct action? there's no murder there. well, the order of stas is lower than the constitution. yes, they are, i'm sorry, i think that experts in constitutional law who share your point of view. i will find there a million explanations that this absolutely fits into the constitution, of course, of course, in this case much, so pavel is quiet, when i said that we have a constitution of direct action, since he knows that i'm right. he therefore understood that it

was quite difficult here. but what am i talking about, listen, the west wants to destroy us, the west does not care about everything, therefore, it is necessary to subordinate to the solution of this task the opposition to the destruction of us from the west, all other actions. they say you want to expand by starting to work off their fifth column. and we say, sorry, we can’t have a sherrochka with a car, a circus, beckoned, vladimir it still seems to me that our general mentality is changing in this part. here are the people. uh, exactly. does anyone know for sure the people there break for once. i would be, therefore, the situation that happened around me now from this country. yes, i see what i'm saying, you're right. well done, well, of course. therefore, if we want to change the world around us, we need to change the world inside, that is, we need to systematize the file correctly in the country, firstly, can i once, a very long time ago, act as a lawyer valery dmitry chizorkina , and i treat him with great respect as

his lawyer, you know, yes, humanism is the greatest humanist, he is a brilliant specialist, i didn’t know him right away, he has a very a lot on this subject. there are publications of books, and he reveals his position, so he acts in the conditions that exist today and are spelled out in the constitution, if they change, then naturally and we will only act in the constitution that we will accept the greatest humanist who heads the constitutional court of any country . not just saying that the greatest humanists are, well, humanitarians. it is they who should head such commissars with great respect, no question. just sorry like some bloodthirsty person. can as in russia it is possible in the blood, perhaps anything can happen with us, by the way, the most humane colleagues will confirm the constitution was stalin's pre-war most democratic and made it possible to win the war in those conditions. and you propose from her, again, i propose to follow the proposals of

oleg viktorovich morozov. i read, of course, brilliant reasoning, i absolutely agree that there are no rules of the game, there can’t be any negotiations with the west for a long time, because the conditions. here is a very correct person remembered that in the soviet times we practically the soviet union, like tsarist russia, did not enter into any conventions of the act. and if i joined, then with reservations, that's just socialist transnationalism and so on, of course, we were trained for 30 years from pedestal to pedestal, and then jeans, then visas. yes, we are now free in the eu there then with missiles the average, of course, yes. let's change the potential threat. well, in reality, we sawed our rockets with americans who are not dialogues and the people have cheap hoppniks. no, no, here you are wrong, the constitution in this constitution was ideology is very simple moral, of course, in principle. remember the fifteenth article yes of the norm under international law. you say, ask away, and what is

his international law? no, for 30 years we have been taught that this is international law, international law, in fact, in essence? this fill just for the celik constitution yes, we are, i do not continue to say. i'm talking about international law, which does not exist today. where it is where it is it all this is the right of the west over all the rest. see how the thesis is now used in supremacy. right, a very beautiful thesis, especially in american it sounds, and the rule of law of what american and western european course, here it is. what is the rule of the right today and we have been taught over these 30 years. what does independence mean independence, this is authoritarianism independence, this is the isolation of traditional values. not tolerance yes , it means there, but any step of independence was perceived as a challenge to the progressive world of which progressive world? in what way is he progressive in killing the old man a sick disabled person through humane euthanasia,

what is needed? yes? in what way is this world progressive today, which imposes on us that russia needs to be dismembered, because our fifth column, which is not threatened by anything, and which continues to receive here, and the fact that we do not answer this in any way, because we still say no well, we do not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. it's impossible. they, then, are our months, but not well, yes, and progressively all this is expressed in the fact that they are endless and have been fighting orthodoxy for a very long time, because orthodoxy is, of course, the most persistent religion. the most persistent faith that did not die in the roman persecutions in the fire of the european revolutions, the bolshevik repressions, and they are fighting, again remembering ruskin. well, he’s not a fool, he blurts out and says to destroy russia, as a stronghold of orthodoxy, it is only due to this that everything orthodox around russia is kept, let’s see who is fighting this. the same people who fought the great victory, of course, the same one and the same, of course, two, the pillars on which the our society great victory to him

bored of religion, which are romantic what happened, that is, we are the great christian great islamic side, what happens? who do we see the down-and-out scum of the sobchak family who beat up orthodoxy mocked at the great victory. we see the bastard venedict. we see all this shobla of rain, and what was it, is it really them, as lukashenka would say. i slurp breastfeeding, they say, their intelligentsia, which the it specialist gave twenty-one, which the it specialists. sorry and now they feel bad, by the way, the west has been fighting islam for a long time and therefore analyze it with all sorts of throwing in the thesis that islam equals terrorism. yes, that is, they are fighting, in fact, they are fighting god with god, and therefore, it seems to me, today we need to remember those principles that have enabled us to survive for centuries, they are very simple. yes

, god controls russia, the best allies of the army, the fleet, the soul of god in the life of the fatherland of the participants. and it seems to me that if we not only remember this, but every young person will know this in the system of education and upbringing, which are required today. a cardinal restructuring well , a cardinal one, well, my friends, the year of the military operation is coming, that we have introduced once a week a conversation is important, well, well, on mondays we raise the flag and sing hymns, we must completely rebuild seven education so that the fundamental idea of ​​which will be exposed to all subjects and the enlightenment system education was one idea. great russia literature. geography. history should not humiliate a student at school today, talking about darkness, but russia's illiteracy yes of course, to the yeltsin center. here it was all drunkenness from the position of the video here, but tell me, and with her property of great travelers. i am discoverers of scientists. that's

only then in the modern young guys will see the future of great russia, which object to the constitution, volodya said at least something, you are now stepping on a sore spot on ideology. i think that we are generally formulated. the church that we are today does not exist constitution write tell us what we are talking about. dmitry wrote a brilliant book about this, colleagues talk about it a lot years. tell me, what are we talking about now with the west. wait for what kind of mechanism of the tide of peace when we turn on the tv and see a mediocre show for the billions that are made, which simply ridicule the patriotism felt by the people who are fighting at the front today, calling them losers. close them, they will rebuild the entertainment industry from the cinema to television, which the state goes to our money with you. only you, when you go to close one of them. they will quietly tell you and the kiss

will stop very simply. it seems to me that we have before there is no biology. on what basis are you complaining to us? you, as one obscurantist called me here. yes, well, yes, everything is also called domostroy, as in a studio. no , well, it's hard for me to endure. i believe that the two actions should be mutually supportive of public consultation and concentration of power. moreover, the higher the concentration of power, the better will be the consolidation of society, which dmitry anatolyevich writes, all these false forms are gone. well , he straightens, he straightens some ideas, but until then it’s clear that the correct one is that there is a war with nato means wartime to act from this. and this should be everywhere , everything must be built as it is. and that's all the people understand everything. the people are clear clear well, as i understand it,

why dima does not get out of the donbass, not only because he is the motherland, because he has no stupid questions. everything is clear there. it's clear? why doesn't pasha come out here. well, everything is clear there, everything is very clear there. you don't understand any doubt. they themselves say it's easier for us. this is hard for you in moscow, deputies of the state duma are going there. people are not for everyone of course, they discovered for themselves that here is the people whom i serve. there everything is limiting clearly here. you start talking, look, if such wise men are all something right here. here you just want. of course, you do not understand that no one will look for any good russians. for the task of our total destruction, we will never be good at any conditions, no matter what we do, and so that we don’t talk and when we do n’t give in, yes, and when there are respected people whom i have known for many years, all of a sudden through a deaf giggle and say, well, i have

acquaintances who would go on mobilization. no, i don't have fools around. so this is what i was talking about, so how can a person be allowed? the father, whom he recalled for his communist ideas, suffered terribly, he was terribly tortured. that is, what is it for ? yes, just a minute. i was in my constituency. this is a small region of tatarstan. i ask how many mobilized people you have and ask questions. you know it broke. i say, how are you mobilizing passed, and he looks at me the head of the district and does not understand what i'm asking about. i meant maybe there were some problems there. someone may have declined. he didn't understand. he says, how the wives gathered. all together spent proud of these. i didn't even understand my question. it is because the question is something moscow generally understand, and there in this it is the

outback. he does not understand this issue, no one will understand in the donbass where almost everyone who could hold a weapon was under mobilization, because there is a concept homeland. real and these of the falafel and hookah and homeland have no advertising. who is against tomorrow at 14:55 on the russia channel you are tortured by a wet cough of emotions an innovative drug for treating cough in adults this is a new molecule that combines the important properties of politicians, previous generations, helps to accelerate the removal of sputum, relieve inflammation and support pulmonary immunity. emulcin is an innovation for coughs in the 21st century. moscow coffee shops are a pleasure to recommend. tablets

based on the novelty phytolax marmalade berries just one at night for comfortable relief in the morning does not cause cramps and bloating, regardless of the type of viral duration of the disease, therefore the highest antiviral measure. and this kagocel packaging you easily. you can find them at the pharmacy. we are transporting discounts and installments double benefit activated in m.video and eldorado celebrate

the new year with vk with new year's playlists with friends with loved ones with content that you want to share and receive a flurry of congratulations in the vk messenger, the place where the new year is celebrated. we take cherkizov. we cut bake to a delicious chicken from the meat of our own farms. introducing a new application. zen only here everything that is interesting to you is collected posts long videos and short videos about your mother i recommend. in a circle of deceitful wills no, i can’t. you said you love me, but i love you. and all mine is yours and vice versa, he proposed marriage to you, and he disappeared with your money and did not have his name or address.

you do not know fools are not only. to other people, they are very dangerous. i will help you in everything. if you are engaged in serious business, you are engaged in a fine protocol and file cabinet, please.

started off the gum was fun moments. somewhere it was sad. you are a very good movie. say, dad, bomb, cheburashka i'm not used to you forget about me like that, but we'll get married on new year's eve, miracles happen at once two long-awaited gifts. two great examples

you know, speaking of rules, it's interesting how everything closes, the americans demand peace according to the rules. oleg viktorovich protests against the rules. well, in fact, after all, there are no rules, everything seems to be about this. said there's one rule against which we parted and, in principle, everything else will be determined by the success of this uprising. well , as far as yes, not a single moment when the victory comes. yes, but how consistently we will win in the process, because, of course, this is a process, because our enemy, of course, is not ukraine at all. here, and

washington, and it is clear that this confrontation is not only long. well, an incredibly difficult game. there you go, incredibly complicated. uh, the military-political strategy that our state needs in all these actions, because well, the american hegemon, he is the hegemon because he captured this height. he really captured her, you know, and this is not an invented thing, so to speak. and this means that he has enough power of power. well, in order to, firstly, capture it and now 30 years at the very least. yes with losses on hold. yes , but 30 years have passed since the violation of the soviet union, so, of course, there is no peace according to the rules, the americans are fighting for the fact that they have the only right. the most important thing is to give orders to everyone. and everyone else has an important duty, do it.

these and this is the only rule of the world in which america is going to live on, because if this world changes, she will not be able, well, in the form that she has, well, she laid her own projects, how did she develop? where did it end up in the twentieth century. it takes a long time to say why? well, in this form, she will not be able to be a creature, and this is the only rule we challenged and refused to carry out the order on february 24 openly in public. therefore, everything else will be only a consequence and a matter of speed. yeah well, how, how are we going to change internally, how will we change externally? in terms of our possible alliances to support interaction with other countries. it is not by chance that i say that this is a matter of serious politics and serious maneuvers, because we understand that we need africa and saudi

arabia and india with china and latin america , not in the sense of a banal cry give us an ally. and in the sense that well, all the actions or inactions that these countries will perform will be either harmful or beneficial to us. this is also very obvious iranians. and well, iran is everywhere, i did not list them all. yes, i see. we're talking there, well , there's a term that came into being and the west that i don't really like, but uh, i'd say weird most. yes, the country is not a golden billion. everything about russia, probably, a progressive person, humanity can be different here. yes, well, that's where we 're going, okay, i won't. yes, you can slip here, right? so. uh, you know, i’ll only say two words about the constitution, but volodya and i are both for ideology and, probably, one of the first publicly. they started about it to speak, but at the same time, and as i understand it, we disagree a little, because,

for example, i think that we have an article that speaks in the country. yes, there is experience in the country, there should be a common obligatory ideology, we don’t even disagree and are freer. yes, we don’t need this, because we shouldn’t have, but we don’t need an article that says that it shouldn’t be in the country, but you understand, even if there is this article, which is difficult to change, again we here arguing today, i believe that nothing prevents us from working. we need dialogue. and even this article is not hinders because the article forbids one entity. this is what any lawyer will tell you about the common obligatory single ideology for all citizens of the country. this entity is prohibited by the country. and that we have someone going to write a book and say, believe everything, or something, it will be worse than well, believe in the constitution of what solovyov just said so? well, here,

we don't want that, really, and that means a problem. you are not in this article. although we may not like it, it is not for me, but in the ideology itself. you see the question who we are where and where we are going and not even in the constitution as a whole and not even in the constitution as a whole, this is me at this level. yes, now you can understand lower and lower, not in the constitution here you say to ban entry. you don't need to know why, because here's a comrade as his tarragon? yes, here is a criminal case, according to the act of the relevant articles, they opened it. come, dear, friend, whatever you want, and if there is no criminal case, but look, look. look, and you are a legislator now working as legislators on a thorough study and composition crimes, by law. you see, by law, to the elements of a crime, well, developed in an appropriate way, there is no

case. sorry, nothing to punish. if not, the corpus delicti. we live in a legal state. i will insist on it. because if there is a corpus delicti, there is something to punish, and if there is no corpus delicti, then there is nothing to prove ebas for, but to publicly condemn, as if sometimes we are shouting here, well, yes, please. well, well, realizing, at the same time, that the compositions of this crime are not, or there is one the question is first by the investigation committee, and then the court is the order of things, therefore, if there is a corpus delicti discovered, i say, why don’t you friends stop by? are you waiting here? and no one will go anywhere, because there is a corpus delicti brought. yes, there is a crime. and if the vessel consists, and he will be condemned, as they say in professional language. here is something there

, as it were, well, another option, like as a punishment, well, implement it, but this is the next option. well, away from all this procedure of the rule of law. it is impossible in no way. here's what i wanted. well, here to say on this discussion and the third, according to the rules, you know. today i read patrushev's article with such pleasure . you see, it's all about the rules. once the secretary of homeland security. well, e wrote i published, in general, there is no talk about the rules. you see, that's right. clearly said. we proceed from the fact that we are power in russia, we proceed from the fact that all power in the world's so-called democracies is a false model, it is said directly. we are in our policy of diplomacy international actions. let's

start from this now. we know this, second. we proceed from the fact that the audience is worth a false name enough. a small group of influential people who manipulate everything, including mr. biden. and we will proceed from this in the future, by the way, here is a three-barrel in the fields, if we talk about the notorious decision-making centers. not even a biden is that not a biden is the center of a friend of decisions, but those whom we have listed, we understand that they are doing it and, accordingly, if we deal with decision-making centers, but it will be necessary to deal with these decision-making centers or with what others. this is only a small part of what is described there, honestly frankly. i 'll tell you honestly. now, if that's a game by the rules you got me sorry it's a take not

flip the table. this is what patrushev did , of course, yes, he said publicly. well, we know what we are dealing with from here all the concepts of negotiations, and with whom. well, maybe you will send someone who is still sitting there for negotiations, or you will send us bidens to us , not to mention summer. therefore it just the situation shows that, in principle, all the rules are broken to the main principle, we refuse to obey, and we are going to talk about the new world only with those. who can prove what it is? here is the basic principle that we will adhere to, the rest is all flowers or bows from my point of view, sometimes very annoying, but sometimes very annoying, but i ’ll tell you honestly, i was in donetsk for 5 days from december 30 to 4 e. so to speak, the new year also met with old acquaintances and fighters whom i had not met before, by the way, here, uh, i'll tell you. here it is battalions

of four digits one of 35 34. these are all those who were mobilized, my countrymen were mobilized on the twenty-fourth there on the twenty- fifth twenty, uh, on the sixth of february, well, or a little earlier. here they, in principle, have already gone through everything, although the intention was fair that these would be troops in the plans, so it was that these would be second-echelon troops that should. well, uh fill the empty spaces. well, they had to go through kherson and even storm in mariupol and now they are there together with sparta and salt are working alongside mobilized fighters. well, these are completely different people. i saw them then, then i was 5 days from the eighteenth to the 23rd there and to us points. well, not personally with them, and even those who are now. these are completely different people, and no one asked me about them. about all these characters, and whom we are here, as if

worried, they don’t care at all. absolutely, because they care when the orders come. here, so that they have just enough to fulfill this order and they intend to fulfill it. everything else they don't care about. actually, that's what happens, who staged what performance or did not stage it? because they have a debt, these are people for a long time and here is the last one, probably, what we will come to, we must come to reorganize ourselves sooner or later quickly, it will be in a few years, in five or 10. i would like to do it faster. uh, we have to change radically the legal, uh, legal structure of our sun, because political rights should have people for a long time, people of service. it is my conviction and to have

unlimited liability in front of this in exchange for these wires give their lives. they have special rights in relation to us, by the way, no, not to mention payments or about the court there is some kind of assistance or something else, they have no other rights compared to us, but they have an obligation of incredible power to give, which no no everyone no. we each give our lives, you know, do not back down from this, but die. they are looking at it there. it's like a duty and they know it. they are what i just said, they do not speak directly in text. yes, it is clear that this is a conversation, uh, from which my reconstruction follows, people are incredibly modest. no one there, so to speak, builds pathos, well, finish or there or start, on the contrary, i don’t know. yes, we must e in the reorganization of our society the rights of the

state by a radical revision of the correlation of the rightful duties of a citizen. this is it, it's not. well, this, if we do this, will be our complete liberation from the world of consumer ideology. financial capitalism and the hegemony of those behind the scenes, because if the right to power will in funded by unlimited duty. i 'll look at those who try to stand behind them and pull the strings. this, in principle, makes the karabas-barabasov system of policy management impossible, in principle, makes it impossible, and therefore we must definitely come to this. this will all end. we will really have a society in which there will be another society, which will be a significant part of the people who have the right to ask, of course. and what are you talking about? and they

can, where have you been and what have you been doing in this no? at the same time, they will ask without any pathos. and by the way, well, here we are absolutely in solidarity with dima, there is no need to feel sorry for these people and awards. because they refused now in a very strange position, they began to fight until the moment they became russia and before they became russian citizens, they were wounded two or three times, that is, do not spare state awards for them. i'm just public. please pay attention. on whom it depends on the battalions and regiments mobilized since february in the republics. they will now change numbers. they'll be pouring in now, of course. it will already be fully armed forces, but the 10 months that i have not passed require status. yes, they demand from our state from the assessment and their feat. and i'm here in public.

i ask you to pay attention to those mobilized in the donetsk and lugansk republics and the units that are still exclusively made up of them. and i would also like to address you from a high rostrum. so we have such distinguished guests rare heroes. dnr lnr are not the heroes of the russian country, but they know people. i think it's posthumous, yes. well, that is, there are a lot of guys, givi, that is, well, legends, that is. they are heroes anyway, but it is very important for their families and in general it is important for donbass in order for this status to be supported by big russia, they died for russia. of course they died for russia, so they fought in the fourteenth year and many such people should not be

spared rewards. it's just not necessary. at first, if possible, i would like to respond to dmitry's words, because i agree with him, i absolutely did not want to add even a little bit. it seems to me that he will agree that in order to destroy even the best ideology in our country, which we suddenly say here, we will develop by joint efforts. here , in order to begin the process of his funeral, it will be necessary to establish it just formally by our people. they immediately begin to reject her. secondly, as soon as she becomes. here is formally, necessarily something required. it will cease to carry in itself in reality. and in fact, we can have folk art in this absolutely in this regard, we have a very large competitive advantage, which lies in the fact that the bearers of any values, not only here, in general, everywhere in any society. the bearer of value is a

person. these values ​​do not exist in the abstract; institutions do not exist on their own. you can take today the entire population of france to load on a ship somewhere to take away and instead of it. bring, for example, the entire population of tunisia to settle there and french laws, social political institutions, they will act in the same way as they did before this because it will. well, yes, nevertheless, the example of the state of liberia in africa yes, why are these completely different institutions there will be completely different mechanisms, because the bearers of values ​​are people and our people are such stable and persistent bearers of their traditional values. with over the past 30 years, all the efforts that have been made are tremendous efforts. i'm not sure that there is another country, in principle, in terms of the scale of efforts. here is what has been done with regard to ukraine over these 30 years, so that it to turn it into anti-russia, in order to turn it into what we managed to turn into the majority of the population of ukraine, the same efforts were made against russia, our population resisted and, in general, was able to

turn away. this is to the extent that we are from the first day of a special operation war. i know that 90 percent or more of the population of our country support it there. this military operation would have been impossible, if in 30 years, it would have been possible to break them over the knee with this globalist and liberal propaganda. now, as regards, uh, the publication of oleg viktorovich which i really liked very much in fact. interesting, i totally agree with her. and in fact, science gives us answers to questions about why so why did we come to this and our american opponents. in general, to be honest, they act right according to the book. they now open the instruction and move according to this instruction. there is a game theory. this is basically a mathematical theory, but it has become very popular in the field of international relations as well. here it, in principle, explains to us how to analyze the strategy of your opponent's behavior and when it comes to the strategy of this behavior. there is such a famous author, one

of the authors of this theory, tom shering. he says, here, if you want to deprive your opponent of jenny's freedom and freedom as much as possible , the first thing to do is to put him in your boat, here's the first thing to do, drag him into your boat, and make sure that he is sure that this gives him a strategic advantage, so you need to say dragging the wto various international organizations. he says, yes, it 's good for you and you still explain it. we are now thanks to this, as soon as you got into the boat for you the idea is to turn this boat over with your opponent. it's already getting so-so, because you yourself are in this boat, the second, what needs to be done? how here, too, the little one is burning is to inspire you that i will observe my duties towards you. it's just that it's not being discussed. for me. this is the holy of holies. i will never break my obligations. then you are interested in so as not to deviate from the pattern that i have already imposed on you. well, in

principle, discussing this, we can trace the path that we went through, trying to integrate into the global space, there and so on. could learn so that nevertheless we were sitting in this one boat already there. i don't know, would sail somewhere together and would exist like that. the same theory explains to us mathematically that there could not be such an example with two criminals who are caught by the police and interrogated at the same time. today we have legal. eh, such a kamba appeared on the program, they are interrogated in parallel and the key is that if one of them testifies against the other, and he does not testify against him , then they let him go, they give him 10 years, if both remain silent, then they get 2 years, if both testify against each other, most likely testify against each other, then they receive 2 years. and if , respectively, both will be silent, they get six months, and at the mathematical level it is proved that both will

testify against each other, there is no scenario in which they will make a choice in which they will either remain silent or give, there is no evidence, so there was a question. when our opponents start against us there, they testify here, they start aggression against us here, the only question was the timing of the mathematical other scenario. it just couldn't be here, which is very important in this theory. here its criticism shows us one important thing, which we often also released and did not take into account the main essence of the criticism of this theory in that it all the time comes from the rational behavior of both parties. with how there is also a scenario in international relations when non-trading economic relations are, that is, a motivating factor for making certain decisions. let's say in the case of the europeans. we see that there is another case there, which, if i am not mistaken, is still zhan-gurtsov. uh, cited as an example it is called deer hunting when two hunters. they can both

hunt the same deer and drag it together. or maybe he hunts one hare alone, in principle, he will pull out one hare, well, a deer is more profitable together and how as a rule, proceeds from the fact that okay, let me feel bad. but it will be even worse for him than no, this is what the europeans do, in principle, it would be possible to hunt deer together, but i would rather let the deer go, because i am 100% sure that it will be worse for you than for me. although we could cooperate here now to the one from the article that dmitry and, by the way, our secretary of the security council spoke about. was there a scenario in which we could not turn this board over? is there a hypothetical alternative a scenario where we don't flip the board? nevertheless, we achieve success, it does not exist, because the only thing that i would like to correct was several times that we are playing with a cheater. yes, we are not the schuler they play. that when, when you

play a sharper, you both know the rules of the game. they are the same just cheaters all the time dancing deceitful to indicate we do not play. we play sharper with the person who sets the rules, we play with the person who actually distributes the deck on his own, who posted guards in the room in case. if something goes wrong , we play. this is not even a card game , we can imagine that we sat down to play chess, like the pieces are all visible. this is an open game. that is, you see other people's figures. your figures. well, you play by the rules, chess. your opponent starts playing like in chess, then at some point it is profitable for him, he starts to move as a pawn, like in checkers, then , like, as he then starts playing chapaevites. and how badly everything takes you. and you board, says he gives on the head in this game it is impossible to win. it's all endlessly going to be a loss, sooner or later. we had to stand up and turn this board over so it wasn't upvoted. true, there are many issues in which we are still waiting, at

least at the level, and i have no doubts that not the president, not our power bloc, have any illusions, they don’t experience something and that’s it. for them it is very clear. in public discourse, we always rely on that old coordinate system, we refer to it all the time, we are trying to find points in international law that have been buried by our opponents. and just to hear it is already being buried. they do n't want to hear about it. we are always trying to justify our actions. here are the existing rules. and i think that gradually over time we will have this awareness, the main trouble will come to us. here, i'm talking to you. that is, you know that we have to take and turn over, we took up this board. so i have a feeling and a squeal, and a little thought, so to speak, and begin to remember. but we follow these rules. a here there will be no reproach. and here we are doing the right thing. but what the book will say no, marinovna, we are still in this state. unfortunately, well, they can disagree with you here. i do not agree with

this, because in relation to the west, the floor has been turned upside down. and to talk to everyone else, there is no new coordinate system, so in order to talk to everyone else, you have to say, we are for international law. although everyone knows that it no longer exists, but international law is what nominally so far only nominally opposes the world according to the rules you see, there is no other entity that could be wanted, i would very much like to create. just international law. it is the light of long-dead stars. well, or so, well, first of all, i experienced great pleasure reading the text of security secrets, comrades. patrusheva the problem is that we do not have another 20 years to start turning from these words into deeds, because when it succeeded, international law was 99 years old during the destruction of yugoslavia and more than 20 years

experts said that we need to disassemble this very thing. what is the people's right? what part of it do we leave, so that the plane, roughly speaking, flew to a country friendly to us. and what part we refuse we must refuse, this is a difficult hard work, no one even sat down for it. no one even seriously spoke to them, except for specialists, and this is our problem. she's not washington's main problem. and not even in the part of ukraine occupied by the nazis is much lower, and even excuse me, not in the constitution yes, our problem is in militant and while the triumphant one is empathetic to a huge part of the russian state mechanism. this is precisely militant and triumphant impotence, when they explain that we cannot recognize the ukrainian gestapa as a terrorist organization, because it is a government body. and since he

recognizes ukraine as an independent state with a window, an undepartmental wrote in its territorial property. we cannot recognize the structure of a terrorist organization as a state; we recognize ukraine as its territorial integrity. i think this did not know to send a piece of paper officially. who wrote this, how strange things are. true, they are this summer in august, because i recently heard the administrator of foreign affairs say something completely different. well, foreign ministers tell it like it is. as it should, but remember, a little different comes to you, when you start asking questions, how else to ask questions, a letter comes from a completely third official who says no. how could you think that we wrote to you what we wrote to you next sanctions against the dprk against north korea has so far participated in these sanctions with all the dope, because our enemies. we have carried out these

sanctions, and we are helping our enemies against our potential friends. we are still members of the world almost said the world terrorist. sorry. i am an economist , the world trade organizations made a reservation, although the meaning of the economic sense is the same with the official wording that if we start developing our economy, but in the end it is impossible to do within the limits, then we, thereby and we will complicate the process of getting out of western sanctions, this is the official wording. you can somehow write the ministry of economic development and trade, fucking with what the medical speakers said, mikhailovich bakov himself thought i was quoting a letter from the central bank where it was said that import substitution leads to the treatment of funds. the measures of this cannibalism can be multiplied indefinitely, but it is precisely here that they are wildly triumphant impotence, proceeding from the fact

that russia should be bound hand and foot, who is gaidar's policy of the nineties in the socio-economic must continue and this is more terrible than the issue of citizenship. well, you can offer the problem of citizenship in the procession of a traitor to the motherland to suspend citizenship without canceling. it 's good you can't do nothing. with citizenship. you can confiscate property , damn it. now now this is the letter of light girls eating. this is now a small advertisement, so michael will continue, because the people with the confiscation of property, that this is such a nice guy, because the confiscation is very easy, so our property was confiscated, the facts were arrested. what sentence here was my italian property? and the corporations are talking about our internal details; here the laws in the castle lack children's inscriptions.

in hand and dress profitably blouse from the parade for 499 rubles. uggs apricot for 1.599 rubles. dress with avaline for 199 rubles. flushed out. you can fall asleep in just 20 minutes wellson sleep lovers. burger king delivers gold blue cheese parmesan cheese sauce and 100% marbled beef. order angus

four cheeses with cashback in the burger app king 100 hours sale discounts up to fifty percent. i help adults and children not get sick polyoxidonium for a cold game, only everything that interests you is collected here, posts long videos and short videos.

no, the pantyhose are super fast, the discount is transported discounts and the installment plan double benefit is activated in m.video and eldorado, i wanted to tell you about the horror that we have experienced children so far we have not completely set off together. well, after all, we live in the bathroom of the country on this our motherland. need to get to the point where wounded last breath heard his exhale, when there lay never rejoices the soul want you to become. we cried one country for all, you are needed there, you need this feeling there, so it didn’t give. i am calm here and have a common fate. this is the best award

this year 16:30 on the channel, russia

film sergei ursulika and ask to survive and reach and there is no choice righteous, but there is a chance soon that with you everything here you feel me, cancer is not funny. it's a joke, please stay in your seats and buckle up seat belts. help help, please. tomorrow at 21:20 on the channel russia we stopped at

this weak huge number of people generate hatred for russia abroad with russian money they have real estate here. but no, real estate is leased by a vessel from russia, this money for this money, our colleagues hate and curse us. i really like the provision of the german basic law that the sacred itself is inviolable as long as it serves the society. and when she starts to turn out to be a hostile society, she ceases to be sacred inviolable property in general. i believe that if a person not only left, he was offended there, not just outraged there, he doesn’t burn, but if he betrays his homeland with his own words by his actions by confiscation of property to hell , the same is true regarding property registered in countries. in the stew of our hostile countries in countries that stole our money, that supply weapons

to kill our soldiers and officers and civilians, if the firm is registered on their territory. her property in russia should be confiscated from her. do not want confiscation of a colleague no problem. resettle in belarus work with calmly further intellectual property calmly further belarus all this issue was resolved long ago. now we will talk very tough about the enemies. there perfectly automatic will stop any hostile activity of some, but it is necessary to adopt legislation. you know intellectual property. it 's been intellectual property for a long time already. it was expressed from the institute for the support of creators , a tool of fierce abuse of a monopoly position. for example, all successful industrial revolutions are based on protectionism and the rejection of other people's intellectual property

. china some and so on, therefore. the intellectual property of the countries of the aggressors of the countries of thieves should not be recognized in russia, and we we will automatically turn into a zone of free creativity and not only software. but engineering. by the way, pavel durov proposed to do this in the fifteenth year in relation to the crimea isn't it time for us to wake up, yes, and in relation to humanism. you see, the beautiful thing is humanism, only humanism in relation to animals turns into atrocities in relation to people. this applies not only to stray dogs that terrorize the whole of russia, this also applies to some, let's say, terrorist dividers, we have entered, everyone has already understood that we are in strategic confrontation with the west. everyone

has already understood that the main thing here is resources, and the resources of this economic development are our colleagues' socio-economic policy. i repeat, as it was stamped during the gaidar, so it continues with minor changes. a unfortunately, we need tough protectionism, that is, please, if you carry something that we do not yet produce perfectly, we will also pay you extra. but if you import something that competes with us at least 40% of the duty, yes, this does not apply to belarus, because what we do in regarding belarus, that we do not recognize belarusian products as russian inside, so to speak, according to internal standards. it's just from a point of view. absolutely unacceptable, like already. well, yes, not all issues have been resolved by mechanization , you know, here’s how the situation with the awards of the lpr dpr is because it’s easy to recognize the fences of the dpr that

were issued, point no, there still needs to be issued. yes, well, regarding the militant potency, there is still no ministry well, these are wildlings, which we still do not have until now, the ministry of veterans who would be very involved. technical problems of veterans, including those with different types of injuries, and this is precisely the specific one, which is a separate completely separate problem, returning to the economy. we need a customs revolution, because protectionism is a customs revolution. we need a tax revolution, because all of our tax system is oriented, to my deep regret, at taking taxes from domestic production and stimulating the export of raw materials with export. raw materials are already big problems. there are excises narcissus must be must be done, emphasis must emphasis was placed on exports. the slice should be focused on exports. we must keep in mind the tax environment, we must take large duties on the abolition of the

tax maneuver, which removed export duties on its oil, and now removes its own for ferrous metals and, accordingly , problems with processing begin. it is necessary how we would do it now, the development of a point gap, we are doing it well, wonderful, mishustin's government. in this regard, absolutely ingenious works. this is a point discontinuity development here. they gave it here. gave here development should be under every bush. this is a cheap loan, which means limited financial speculation and the arbitrariness of a monopoly, because otherwise all prices will skyrocket, and secondly, this decline is restrained so that our basic industries work not for the yachts of some oligarchs, but for them to work for value added production further down the technological chain. you know, this is the next question and i'm afraid that people are always working and instead of thinking they start doing the following, even if

podrastuhu, but the point is not that it is necessary that the basic sectors of the economy work to reduce restrained for the entire economy. i'm sorry, that's motivation. unfortunate sector. yes, i do not mind just how to do it? well , in order for the costs to be lower than the nationalization, 51% were nationalized, and due to this, the costs. why will they be lower, because you mean that they don’t pay their owners like that from us and the soviet directors stole. so mom don't worry. it just seems to me that if we are talking about costs, then we need to look. maybe for these industries there should be completely different prices for electricity for rent. that is, simply reduce the costs of the system. no. yes, this is systemic, of course, if, for example, you compensate them for the interest rate. yes, if we say that we need these industries to develop, so that de facto they have interest-free length, in fact, in fact, with

profitability, credit is available to it. it's 2% per annum for everyone should be 2% per annum. well, energy should also cost a minimum. of course not, for this you need to find an exclusive policy. carefully tariffs and so on, as the military- industrial complex was. i spoke there with the people that you pcs deal with. they say that our profitability was so low and it changed so much inside that, in principle, we chewed only through sales abroad. yes, yes, and another vice-premier, borisov, complained that everything is still working on bank loans, because all the profit they earn goes to loans, which are dray i'm what a and the guys say, well, okay. but how do you develop? how machines are purchased. well, well , you must not have lost, costs, this is a systemic comprehensive. i'm just because it's only natural to take on the head of the owners. well, ok. there, and so the owners are

completely different heads of familiar stories, because the pen is deripaskov's. we all remember, the most expensive pen in the history of the human world is a pen. return it, but what is the system to look at? the soviet union collapsed, and in that clay economic when it would seem that there were red directors, but it suddenly turned out that they were also very rich often. they are richer there, for example, it is no coincidence that rashnikov. magnitogorsk receives the hero of labor, because he is his profit. i'm sorry i invested in order to buy magnitogorsk rolling pants - this is the exception of such exceptions to the rules for a dozen more. i can name a lot. that is simply when we speak for the system. yes, i also just mean that this system is not always a linear approach to take away and give to the state. we had supposedly on behalf of the state grefa on behalf of the state greta just created a highly efficient most high-tech company. no, he did something, yes, and he

did well. now he came to the mins in england who bought a house there. the same minsk , which in a cunning way is with us, allegedly on the wanted list , yes, they have property in russia, everything is in order, chubas, and that's it. suddenly you think such schemes. they are doing something directly outward. capital should not remain in the country, and therefore in the official sphere. yes, it didn't help. they therefore closed the export of capital to be closed. the truth must be carried out a new implementation of the economy and forgive one person one citizenship, because there is only one loyalty in a person. yes, freshness only the first. she's the only one. loyalty, but we have citizens who have one loyalty passport, no, this is another. this, unfortunately, also happens. well, throwing a bridge to what or from what mikhail gennadievich said, according to the veteran’s body, the need is obviously brewing for the creation of

temporary governing bodies caused by e, conducting a special military operation. there is no need to cling to the old system of the ministry of state affairs committee. veterans have now created a unified command. see how the situation has changed at the front obviously. uh, the state committee for affairs, liberated and pre-front territories there. you actually act by sending representatives of the presidential administration there, who will not come out of there sovmena. well, not for the work of the defense committee. well, it's like a general thing. here you can still talk about it, but these bodies are temporary. they will still be needed in their lives e about the fact that we are talking about those officials who write incomprehensible letters by the way . uh, a bygone reality about those who, out of outdated norms, make a fetish into hypocrisy around supposedly law, on in fact, some representations of their interests and, uh, these delusions. i 'll beg your pardon, but uh, i'll

quote stalin again. maybe it was once said on december 11th. well, since his constitution was mentioned here on december 11, 1937 , speaking at the bolshoi theater in front of voters, iosifovich said, you know , sometimes politicians, but sometimes, political inhabitants say such people who don’t know, whether he is brave, or cowardly , either he is for the people, or he is against the people, as gogol said not e in the city of bogdan is not in the village of selif, and as the people say, it’s not fish, nor meat, nor a candle to hell with god, a poker, he says there are such people with us and, of course, they are around us, but they have become. just beautiful. that's how he stated, he gave the recipe. he spoke about the voters, and he said the function of the voters is not only to come to the polls, but continues and throughout the entire period of the supreme council's activity, this is the pressure

of civil society. it requires politicians and legislators to bring norms rights according to life. this society requires solovyov kulikov morozov or someone else, this is the demand of people, respectively, the function of politicians and voters, politicians and legislators to respond to these aspirations of people, and now the example of belarus, as we have done , was also mentioned here. here, let's be direct , and they are to mention that here different scenarios were offered to us and here we were criticized. well, let's remember august of the twentieth year. here we would have acted in some other way. by those allegedly the rules that the west offered us and some in moscow suggested. if now there would be no belarus that is an ally of russia , and there would be no russia, there would be a war, but not 22 years, and the war would begin much earlier

on the territory of belarus lukashenka comes out with a machine gun, but first of all, when he does not pick up the phone, the caller is merkel, who, as everyone found out. just wanted to deceive and deceive us wanted to once again. just does not pick up the phone, but acts as it should in these circumstances, according to his own rules, as he and the people understand this. but then we began to change the legislation. the first stage was the spring of 21, a whole series of amendments to laws and one of the important elements. she says, well, what do you take for history, we opened a case on the genocide of the belarusian people during the great patriotic war. why because we show the root? where is it coming from? here is what we did not agree on, that historical truth, which we did not assess, which let's let's just say. we are talking in the soviet union , we talked about what they said in the fifty-fifth year, bandera and policemen were all released and

preferred not to recall collaborationism. well, well, there were some. well, vlasovites. that's what they called it. and what was there? who was there? here we need to figure out that these accomplices of the nazis, their spiritual subsequent ones are actually equal to nazism and having melted historical points, we create a base the referendum was held in february of this year. it is written in the fourth article that democracy in the republic of belarus is carried out on the basis of the ideology of the belarusian state, the diversity of political institutions and opinions, but no ideology of the party of a religious social group. it cannot be established as mandatory, but some kind of national idea must be present. this is a constitutional goal literally 5 days ago is also a long time. he found the debate the president signed the changes to the citizenship act. now. well, not only

a person is obliged to declare that he has a different nationality residence permit there. eh, there is definitely a question about the map of the poles. there are some other documents. this is the card of the pole sent, but the state also gets the right to deprive of citizenship. even a citizen of the republic of belarus by birth. in the event that the court passed a sentence, and his participation in extremist activities. or it does some other damage. for the interests of the republic of belarus, being abroad, this is the most important document, it bears both moral and legal and political in nature, because we give an assessment to those people who, having left our country, harm this country and try to speak on behalf of our country. that is the danger of these russian fugitives. we don't even call them immigration. we call them fugitives. it's yours that run too. they are trying to speak on behalf of the russian people

, which they reject, spit on, but consider themselves to be some other or, as they say, good russia, and then there will be next steps and they are already trying to take. this creation alternative political centers of all sorts of new people's labor unions. this is an attempt to create paramilitary illegal formations from those who ran through upper lars, and look at the fate of the belarusian fugitives who are being driven. now they are there a few volunteers. they have not collected from us . well, they need little shelf cases. and so they push them there and the same thing will need to be assessed with yours, by the way, the soviet experience, which for some reason is little talked about, well, they know the operations of sindika test - this is a tense multifaceted not only along the line, intelligence agencies work with immigration, which, by the way, brought success both before the second world war and after the second world war. this experience also happened here. i think it's unavoidable. we'll come

anyway. eh, to these goals. well, then yes , you need to think about what to do with the property with the property of those who cause damage, and they still own it. here we see sometimes at gatherings. there are people out there. and we know that they still own companies on the territory of belarus, of course, the citizens themselves raise the question before the state. what to do with this property? why do they still own it, although they set the goal of seizing illegal power, and you have one. there is a situation, and what it says the logic of life itself will push us. eh, to these decisions. we started with an article by oleg viktorovich, he was surprised and said why there is such attention and in a sense, he was rightly surprised, because he wrote that life is shown to us. this article is actually a reflection of reality, nothing more. i strongly ask. and the only thing i would like to say is that oleg morozov, as acting

member of the state duma i could not just write a post in a telegram, but i could prepare a draft law and put it to a vote. you would see how 400 of your colleagues would vote which of them is worth all this talk about the constitution, its holiness is that it cannot be constantly changed, that is. well, one of the manifestations of the legacy of the ninety-first year. this is all the logic of the ninety-first year. this is the logic of the colonial country of the colony, which suffered a historical defeat in the ninety-ninety -first year. here in this logic, we are with you, but, unfortunately, very many representatives of the elites and political and business officials and high-ranking officials. in this logic, they continue to live in general , talking about the rules, this legacy is all the same . damn 1991, what the hell are the rules? whose rules? well, let's turn to the soviet experience,

and at the level, but such, well, what are called memes in the head of stereotypes, which was mentioned even in legal practice, which is the most important thing for a soviet person. law observance of soviet law. we reminisced about the constitution once a year, maybe there was stalin's then brezhnev's. well, there is some kind of constitution, there is a law, there is our soviet court, the most fair court in the world. this is actually a reflection of a country with a national sovereign consciousness, who we are and why we are for ourselves we are for ourselves we ourselves set the rules, based on which from our values ​​from ideas about our e- national expediency about our goals and objectives all other rules absolutely correct they were signed exactly in the event and with those

reservations, if they served the goals of the world revolution in the interests of the world proletariat, well , in the final analysis, in the interest of the socialist commonwealth, even joining the a vivid example of how it was? the soviet union does not need a superpower, this is when in the fifty-first year, the famous speech of the same stalin is mentioned for the third time today, where he said that the organization the united nations, created for blah blah blah blah, has become a tool. this means that militant revanchist circles and the soviet union for several years did not participate in the work of the un for several years that the sky fell to earth. the soviet union ceased to be a soviet union. well, most likely the soviet army. already through east germany received the korean war cossacks. naturally for political

independence. all 7,000 years of human existence. we have to pay a different blood. like blood does not exist, that is, we are now we pay for our independence with blood. here, in fact . it's not even the rebellion, it's the war of independence. our war of independence, which we lost in 1991, if ​​we hadn't lost it, we wouldn't have adopted the yeltsin constitution, which, well, is so secondary, so nonsensical, did not reflect the idea of ​​the russian intelligentsia about what it was and what it was for. this is us for 30 years. we carry on with this constitution and make amendments to it. listen, let's remember the time when it was taken. well, in what historical the situation has changed, it is changing right now. i am absolutely convinced that after the victory in this military campaign,

which is still not commonly called a war, a new constitution of russia will be adopted where we will resolve all fundamental issues. i only know one thing about the constitution of the ninety- third year. many hoped, of course, everyone had serious plans. but i just would not forget that this is the cursed constitution restored the autocratic principles of governing the country and the transfer of power realized exactly in the hands that needed to be, and not in some others. that's all, the first and second were the consequences of this constitution. and if there had been a victorious revolutionary society, where we are in the third year, i am afraid that we would no longer have it at all. you didn’t understand, with a victorious revolutionary society, they were in a state with centralized control. this is not true for well some brands. i'm sure we'll

find it. i just see, we have to, well, we have to evaluate everything together. we can’t talk about the soviet union. you said it right sergey no one was interested. so the constitution was nothing. no collectives discussed it, and therefore, when gorbachev came out in 1985 and said, we have a telephone right, we will all fight for the rule of law. everyone said. well, of course, yes, we will fight for the right of the troops of the state of telephone law. we will not be exactly, because the society here is this rule and the principle of law. how certainly existing was not between russia once was? well, this is oh, let's take a question, here is vladimir putin yes, to the question of a country in which there was no law everyone didn't care and it was. that's it, prediction, i'm arguing. so you say,

and when it’s different, but i’ll remind you, i said, volodya, every major soviet newspaper, there was a whole staff of people who received hundreds of thousands of letters every day , worked through them, partly went to the central committee of the party, the supreme council and makes a decision on them. what i mean is that people did not write in an abstract newspaper. they knew that the authorities listen to the authorities make decisions not on the basis of telephone law on the basis. well pardon me the stylistic legality. all but, finally, in the seventy-ninth year, which works it is he who must advise everything else. well, if you where did you go this year, if you were a country, you would not have demolished, not dressed, in the ninth year. you forgot that the soviet union began to rot in 1958, everything

worked, if everything works and everything works. yes, it worked for me, not for you, judging, and she i remember about the pension. and three shots. if you pass, then little will not show me to you. control yourself here do not interrupt. don't get personal. i warn you, and secondly, there is a small the problem is that if the mechanism worked so far, we would live in the ussr. and so everything was fine. and by the way, i also want than now and the beer was better, but better than now. i lived in the ussr now, with all due respect, definitely not better than now. excuse me, of course, but i am a family of intellectuals who received a penny housing. the conditions were such that already with horror the concept of a machine did not exist. if a telephone appeared in an apartment, it was a joy, so the concept is better than now lived in moscow and in moscow telephones appeared in

every apartment. i want you. remind only somewhere in the eighties much later, well, 80-91 years, they appeared, therefore, there is something like constitutional law here, therefore, when we try to idealize ours in the past, these are wonderful soviet unions, indeed, every time it comes through like small towns, but let's still be objective. if by age there, well, not all. we lived there and it was good, we remember everything was perfect. he wouldn't go anywhere. and certainly we did not live better than now. for many reasons and quite objective, but certainly no. there are people who lived in the country lived better in the country, but i'm sorry, of course, if the country lives well, and people live poorly, then this is a strange idea, because the legs of the pen were torn out. let's see any part. how many flybys you received from you party

workers received crazy money, and flies very expensive. i knew the proletarian who 1,000 rubles. the port received a ticket and showed me where he received thousands of rubles. it turns out that they performed the usual proletarian who started there as a mechanic. he started with mines, and intellectuals received 70 rubles. 80-90. the engineer started with 110, so 120 to a maximum of 140. well, of course, the maximum, so there is also a nuance. so that's why there was a distribution system and that's why, i'm sorry . remember how you ate, remember how you waited for these endless ones. uh, for the holidays, when they gave out food packages, these orders, how teachers at school received, well, we begin to idealize, but let's be cool it was meat, yes, policemen, among whom there were no criminals, there were no such as now

any, no matter how any colleagues. well understand the time. he's the same. look, my friends. well history is smarter than all of us put together. in the 1990s, following the results of these 1990s , it seems to me that we received such an inoculation. it's true. we have received this vaccine. and here is the current situation. here it is made up of that vaccination from a completely new one. well now i will say thinking it will say understanding of what is happening in the world. listen, really. well, it's turned around. it’s just that there shouldn’t be an illusion of a right-rule about a law about a constitution, which certainly should be at the heart of our legal system. and if we do not recognize this, it will be wrong, but all the decisions

that we must make today. they must obey the tasks that solve them the other way around, and then we will understand, and what to do with the constitution in the future and the law and solve other tasks, including, according to which mikhail short remarque, where exactly the speeches are, here the fact is that in the yeltsin constitution yeltsin's constitution laid a mine under the unity of the federal state, and therefore in 2000 we came to the conclusion that half of the heads of the subjects were called presidents, and only the introduction of federal districts through the constitutional law was somehow suspended, and then through the supreme court and the constitutional court they canceled the name president of the country president, that your president of mordovia canceled well done yes, they started calling them presidents, but the main thing the problem was solved in this constitution and the battle for it was terrible. will our federation be negotiated or not? this battle, which the central power won, had to change, was terrible. this is the bitumen for these summed up

putin only yes, yes, the constitution then planted a bomb after tatarstan did not immediately sign the formula that powers are distributed, including by agreement. yes , and just putin managed this system of 2000 . we have come to the conclusion that there is putin's alignment now advertising after we will continue in the new line-up. the 60 minutes program is on air, we have a special edition, we start with urgent news 60 minutes. don't miss tomorrow at 11:30 and 17:30 there are not many films on the russia channel where you can endure such a bright moral no, hopeless people, every person has the opportunity to fix something in his life, because you remember that one family is important

, the house is important. where are you from. i really liked playing kuznetsov. i think he is right in life. simply wonderful. i really liked the nature of the picture in general , the connection of the mother of the faith of modernity, the change of generations. it is very important. e sentence of the first part treacherous behavior here the difference between a man and a woman noticed when it turns out that my husband and my cat are the most intelligent creatures on north orientalism. this is conditionally some kind of

parallel agenda, the continuation of the conversation in the new episodes of our podcasts, so as not to miss anything. subscribe listen and watch on the video platform. the podcasts we watch bad didn't really want to kill you. i live in

your house. i sleep with your husband your children call me mother quickly fell silent. i'm not an angel to give marina my family so easily, someone else's happiness. on saturday and sunday on the channel, whether you like it or not, but we will get married on the new year happen miracles at once two long-awaited gifts.

right now we are watching the holiday on the platform. now everyone is waiting for news from the front from the artyomovsk direction. well, here is just semyon. i think that a great poet still serves on this topic and the poem. and they will make films about these battles. our guys and of course, what is happening there now, like the world, and whatever, for 100 years has returned again with

the hardest bloody battle at the level of the first world war already at a new level of comprehension technology, and when everything is decided by perseverance on both sides colossal. in the nazi werewolves, which is interesting, they hate us and wish us all death semyon will not let me lie. but i have never seen such hatred from our people, there is never a question. we will kill all ukrainian women, even close the very idea seems wild. we grind the grouping in solidarity. artyomovsky, who is now arguing, what is the correct name for artyomovsk residents, then they will decide, then in the

donbass they will decide for themselves. what to call the main thing is that the nazi evil spirits were not there, while kiev cannot understand in any way, that is he doesn’t need it, that is, now they say, well, there’s no strategic significance and perry’s task is to thresh, and we put so many of them there. well, for now, this information that comes from the ukrainian side indicates terrible losses. and i spoke to many people who are fighting right now and, unfortunately, a characteristic feature of this war, that the ukrainians are abandoning their dead. and then, when we collect them, we bury them for christian reasons, we leave these places, they open the graves and scream. look what the russians have done. but at the same time we still do our christian duty. we don't fight the dead. yes, and it should be noted that we

do not finish off the wounded. and when the guys drag on themselves for many kilometers and pull out the wounded and do a large number of operations, the blood is transfused and nursed. they are not cut on the belt, they are not shot through the knees, they are not castrated, the fingers are not cut off. even close a to show to what state our guys are being returned from captivity. this is scary. at the same time, america and europe do not care about this. they will support ukraine to the end. well, ukraine does not exist for them. for them, this is hurt russia destroy russia what they are, even time should be spent on quoting a set of madmen. so you don't even

have to pay attention to them. but in america, if those who understand everything, for example, an article that appeared condalism here with gates, it's what the american is talking about, guys, and you are by no means on the winning side. of course, we tell you everything. and you. well, although i will retell what was shaped much better than me, such as carlson ford community ukraine wins says hillary clinton ukraine wins says the entire american media establishment anyone who says the opposite is working for russia is what they relentlessly tell you because they want you to think that we are on the winners team and most americans believe because how do they know that it's different they don't have sources in ukraine so you can imagine the shock readers had over the weekend when they read

robert case's articles if you're now trying to find the two most discredited figures in america probably. choose rice because that few people have done more to relax this country, but the majority of americans. i don't know, because the snakes would never say that, as gay, cheese from high-ranking members of the clubs in their article want you to know that ukraine is losing heavily they write that if the us does not continue to support the armed forces economy forever ukraine and fight. russia directly this country will fall and putin will be able to invade malibu here i quote the economy of ukraine is in ruins millions of inhabitants, fled infrastructure is destroyed, and most of its general wealth of industrial potential and agricultural land is under the control of russia. well, really, you are our unpleasant. why know her? stoltenberg, he, suddenly, too, began to understand something, come up with

visible, we strongly dislike it. i guess i can start by saying that you're right that fan allies and weird eu members have depleted their supplies giving support to ukraine. but that's the thing to do, because it's all about our security. and, of course, we must use our resources, our reserves munitions to help ukraine i can honestly say to a nato ally that if they have to choose between meeting all the guidelines for this in terms of supplies and capabilities and providing support to ukraine, then it is much more important to help ukraine and therefore we have been able to provide an unprecedented level of support to ukraine throughout many months. there is only one long-term solution for this. we must not

underestimate russia, they are mobilizing a large number of troops. they work hard require more equipment more ammo. they show a willingness to suffer, but to continue the war allies, nationwide, eu members have depleted their military reserves by providing assistance to ukraine. but this is what we must do. it's all about our security. and, of course, we must use all our capabilities, all our stocks and ammunition to support ukraine, to fuck not a bad idea, well, if there is no army, no, no ammunition, no stocks, no, maybe then again berlin paris in london we have never been, well go to the cemetery to the grave of marx is interesting, not well, but what, they are rude and rude and think that all this will do for them. here is general lietanovich gurulev

regularly. he says that he can’t get warm in any way, either to fuck around paris, or apollo and i think you don’t have to deny yourself pleasure, you can go there and there. here is one of the main russophists in germany, and he is beaten like that. and this is how he writes. he is terribly indignant in ukraine now, allegedly, there is a complete mobilization. and yet it seems to me that only a million active defenders are fighting for the country absolutely, maximum at this time, as 10 million of combat-ready age were drafted into the army, that they do not understand it. so this is where the ukrainian reserves are, where are the 100,000 territorial defense fighters, where are the trained conscript soldiers. which now should not protect any other sector of the front. why does it always seem that russia has more men than ukraine russia has more men than ukraine and then because many of those whom he is waiting for are already at a meeting with bandera. true, you just need to talk, by the way, turnips. and you yourself are not at the

front, and he is not a man. exactly, i forgot. semyon as a leg, thank god, do not complain, quietly. i'm already back in line. we congratulated you and were very happy when the supreme commander-in-chief personally presented you with the well- deserved order of courage. it directly calls giant respect. thanks a lot , but i'll say it again. i think that today every resident of donbass in some sense deserves this award, because of the masculinity of those ordinary people. fortitude you yourself recently from there is just there, uh, kievsky prospekt is there, i don’t know, they’ll already find it directly for a couple of kilometers. uh, fights forehead, what is called a person rides there on a minibus picks up people and takes them to work. it's just brainwashing, and donbass lived in this mode for 8 years. it's just crazy. yes, if and everyone who is now fulfilling their civic duties for me is absolutely

100% heroes, and here is the subject of admiration for the present, it seems to me, how do you see what is happening now, if the situation changes, are we learning, have we learned to me unconditionally certain conclusions, of course we did, if we take there those mistakes that are partly were allowed precisely at the initial phase of the operation, when we constantly fell into the so -called fire bags, yes, when it seemed to us that e, how cool, we occupied this settlement there, but they simply lured us there, they launched us and started unwind from all types of weapons available. yes, then, of course, in this sense, we see that one way or another the experience has already appeared. we already understand and feel. uh, thinking a few steps ahead, and i think it's very important. here we are moving away from bronze heroism there. yes, when there is team, no matter what you become. there on the machine guns overhead go there in full growth. yes

, very correct. in my opinion, we are leaving in such an inte. the main heroism and this is very important. yes, that's why, as i understand it, we are now, uh, really already breaking into the enemy's defenses, including in solidarity and near donetsk near avdiivka, and so on, already really acting precisely by outplaying the enemy. yes, there are more coordinated actions. this is naturally felt, including in the results, but at the front, i, uh, i would like , yes, that they often talk about it in broadcasts and i think you will also agree with me. and what about the military experience of donetsk middle-level commanders. and i say, yes , it’s clear that there are many commanders there who are russians, yes, and who volunteered there in the fourteenth year before growing up there to battalion commanders and so on and so on, that not all of them are local, but for them they call themselves honor there, part of the first donbass

corps of the second lugansk corps, and some even here. and i have something, here it emphasizes that they now belonged. that's exactly the caste of these e, units. yes here, i think these commanders, perhaps, here, following the example of the great patriotic war, when the same zhukov saw there, roughly speaking, there was a quick-witted, savvy sergeant, and he could, relatively speaking, start commanding a regiment there. and it bore fruit. and here is the ingenuity of these people who were forged in the war. yes, they, what is called hmm, have already fought. they feel it, don't they? that's not at a distance, there from somewhere from the headquarters, but on your own what is the name of the skin? yes, they crawled there themselves and they know the taxi that i have there nazis use. here they are from a somewhat speculative point of view, namely, flesh and blood. so, of course, i would encourage these people, but in one way or another somehow promoted them, gave them, probably, more

powers, because, for example, here. he was your friends in my friends. uzhogi he is a colonel, but it is obvious that it is high time to be a general and command a much larger unit of the sixth territorial defense detachment. yes, colonel somalia is also an evil boycott, when we talk about tag, we talk about guys who, according to our formal featured, so to speak, as i met a number of colonels. well, these are quite grown-up guys. well, that is, they are quite adults, that is, 10 years younger than me, when i say colonels, for some reason the colonel says, well, i graduated from the academy, they say. and why didn’t you graduate from the academy? yes, i fought all the time, of course, time, who will, if everyone goes to graduate from the academy because he didn’t graduate from the academy, he can’t, it’s true they can’t appoint, maybe, based on the situation. now we need to grow the guys mode, turbo- raise them. well, they want to let

them do general courses for them, but these people need their experience, which is really priceless. i do not want to beg in any case the lady of the education of the generals, who graduated from the general staff academy of the general staff and so on. well, that's fine mordovitch is the same surovikin. there are questions, just these are the military salt of the earth, yes, in fact, maybe , uh, now at the front, just not enough. here are such non-standard solutions, of course, including, as it was in the fourteenth year, when sasha zakharchenko also your friend, and the same motorola when people did not have. yes, there may be some high-ranking military officials, but they beat them in the field and could outwit some high-ranking ukrainian military leaders there. just because of some daring decision there. and this experience is actually, as it were, accumulated and it is applied, of

course, mainly in those sectors of the front. just where we're moving forward. yes, and it seems to me that, uh, this layer, this golden layer of those people who were forged, were already forged in this war and from the banal change of generations, too, after all, plays a role, because with all due respect to the senior generals. all clear. oh oh young. yes, yes , there are wrinkles, others with other mechanisms that are already being switched on, or a different level, but the ingenuity of something else. that's it. this one. i think we still lack a lot. and most importantly, what is there to take from? why don't we take it? today i spoke to the guys from the world. i'm not saying that's great. we came up with. here, look at the hangers for playing the guys you need to burn. here it works center. and now it will immediately become clear that what you came up with is worth the time or not worth the time, because right there you can try everything. well,

this, by the way, is also the center of barren systems. so, on my knees, it was there , my friends in smolensk, we began to create, then we saw it supported by the state. yes , at the same time, kirenko saw that this could really be promising in terms of training, but it was an initiative from below that was supported in time and the people’s war. therefore, it’s just pulling out this initiative from below a hundred percent. this is what i would look at. i believe that this is vital for us. i think that would be great. i'm not going to do. i don't want this. right now, when the first second corps is being merged with the army. why is it important not to get tired of crushing me ? and to pull out the experience and change the statutes so that they correspond to today's day, so that it is clearly reasonable and correct vladimir vladimirovich well, i got where you started, you mentioned this strange discussion that has now begun about whether to return the name artemov to bakhmut or

no? yes, for some reason in moscow they are discussing this. yes, pushilina today, they asked about this. he says, so wait , well, the inhabitants will decide, they decided, in fact, in the early nineties, in the late eighties, early nineties, who wanted to return the name luhansk. that turned away, who wanted to return mariupol, the inhabitants of artyomovsk, they wanted to remain artyomovsk, and well artyom, the founder of the donetsk republic in the story that you wrote, it would be strange to initiate in the donetsk republic. but the most important thing is not the most important thing. i want to stress myself the approach is wrong because artyomovsk was never founded in the donetsk people's republic, it was never founded , as it was in artyomovsk, according to our laws, it remained that the ukrainian occupiers took it and renamed it without asking the inhabitants in the same way, then let's now discuss krasnodon. he is no longer krasnodon but. sorokino yes or what? this is ukraine. i don't have

to ask the residents of crimea now, they don't even suspect that many cities are already called differently. well, according to the decision of kiev well , well, let's discuss this a little now a strange discussion is now called in a different way, that, well, kiev is in a different way kiev is fine there, kuev himself it was. excuse me, well, yes, the hussars are silent, yes, yes, but what about? i’m at these transfers. listen, it’s really the residents themselves, then they will decide not in moscow, it’s not in st. petersburg, not in kiev, uh, the residents themselves will determine, indeed, what the city is called. when , uh, all these battles end, this is not the most important problem , as for, and what is happening now under artyomovsk and under solidarity. you know i consider myself superstitious person. of course, i'll wait. yes, i'm not in a hurry, as many now also say zelensky delivered

a statement there yesterday. uh, about how many people interpreted it as actual surrender. actually. i want to say that the changes in uh, fit uh, bakhmut, as the ukrainian western media write in excel. it happened back in november in december, even then they suddenly began to write about those cities that they had recently called key, that this had no strategic importance, and now many western media continue to shout, what of course, bakhmut has no strategic significance, but that's what ukraine really is now. we allow statements zelensky admits this probably indicates that they are preparing public opinion for a painful defeat. uh, it was on this site we were not in a hurry. that 's why i'm saying, i'm saying, i 'll read it now, but the opinion is not about what happens

once they were burned, so look, when ber god now announced in kharkov that he would supply weapons, it was clear that they would give tanks and it is clear that these two corps, which are now being trained in europe, that is, this is now the whole calculation is not accidental. we have not yet brought our 150,000 into battle, not exactly, therefore, it is not by chance that we do not show all our equipment, which the reserves suddenly said so opanki, there are tank factories so high. yes, it works well, yes, and they even produce something, but, uh, that's why i'm and unlike many. i'm just not in a hurry. it is no coincidence that ukraine is still concentrating troops and equipment there. this means that they hope so there, but to repel something and allow it. a what about the new ones? whether ukraine well, the military decision is not made by ukraine. you know very little that all these statements about tanks that will now go. here you quoted stoltenberg, who today said that nato is the european union,

it means more to supply a and so on with tactical nuclear weapons. yes, i have a couple that are very suitable for this city, again, london or paris well, no, there are yes , that's what carlson asked the question. yes , about the fact that ukraine wins won. this is what we have actually confirmed. for a long time. and when they say now they urgently need new tanks, new weapons. and why does it still add up? well, if you believe your own reports. yes? you have been telling us for so long that ukraine is developing everything there, and then you shout, well, we urgently need it, we just need it very urgently. inflatable rockets and tanks, otherwise, what else turns out problems such in ukraine that they recognize, in fact, these very howls, but uh, at the same time, you see when there are already increasing casualties among all kinds of mercenaries. today. i like it choke on the daily telegram e of the british

newspaper, in general, an amazing posing of the question britain supplies, so, uh, decided to send tanks to ukraine as since the british humanitarian workers have disappeared, that is, it turns out that they are going to supply tanks to ukraine for a long time they say , yes, and those are the spirit of british tanks. and now it means, all of a sudden, two british alleged humanitarian workers are missing. uh, there's a 28-year-old christoferry, 48-year-old andrew backshaw. today i tried to know their biographies to dig through the wool. what is there? what were these humanitarians doing? hunters, well, as usual, the company that they supposedly represent there was created yesterday by a retired new zealand officer, by the way, we are very actively photographing recently that with the prime minister of new zealand yes, and that is, there is no particular biography

. people don’t have one, supposedly a coach. on the run somewhere in the english city was, but something somehow. uh, for some reason, the british newspapers themselves write allegedly. yes, and the second one generally appeared there in veteran officer organizations. well , for some reason, the british media write everything. this forty-eight, brother, what, what is he, uh, a new zealand genius. and what about the geneticist, so there for the purpose for nothing and under artyom. why send him there? you can immediately black transplan. well, i'm wondering if there are any experiments, they are conducting either a genetic weapon or a biological weapon is being developed. i really, really hope they're alive. i really want to believe that they didn’t come under artillery fire there and that, after all, they will be able to with them, because, judging by their biographies closed by this, we would immediately say. well, i mean this, that is, this, maybe anything, but that is, there is. if you didn’t

hit, then there is already a mechanism there, and no one needs it yet. i think that the pressure is on the other, that there will be such a density that yes , of course, the very fact of the appearance of these people there on the front line can be decided. yes, in fact, today i spoke with a respected person. well, yes, he served most of lugansk for 7 years, his family left the united states, he served in the american army for major political reasons, he refused, he now lives in the suburbs there. teaches your children americans say, well, if you look at the equipment, which obviously serves only americans, but we are talking past thousands. americans of course disposed of. that is, the americans hide these losses, but this is

only from that thousand, that is, americans, that is, it is clear that, well, that is, as he believes, hammerson, the ukrainians do not let him in. well, that is, in the same way as ip will be served. naturally, only a visit must be understood that hymarsa. in any case, they are served directly through the american ones, of course, but it still works with them, but in in this regard, when they are now talking about tanks, yes, modern ones, which they are going to supply in ukraine, we understand perfectly well that the crew will not be ukrainian either. well, how? well, well, tanks are always difficult, but you also need to understand that there are some tanks. what could they be for. they are extremely heavy, wildly voracious in this sense. i think there are very important military experts who thought to us all this now that the tanks will appear for us. it's hard, but it will be much easier with them to learn how to work on the territory of ukraine, which is then easy understand on the territory of germany and where else to find out that we will stop? we are by the ocean and

where else to find out? how did they work in moroz? well, that's also true. there are already addressed something, yes, addressed. yes, sure. right now, ukraine is completely dependent on all foreign aid absolutely, because in fact you are not yet working on trying to create production capacities. at least for repairs, minor repairs fail, discovered we destroy, so everything is carried from there and uh, now uh, of course, they are going until heavy equipment. and it goes here. uh now go talk about the supply of infantry fighting vehicles bmpredli 2 marder, and the french wheeled tank amx 10rc and ride. yes, they are trying, because semyon, you can confirm that here is one of the main tactics that have been used recently is rotatactic groups with equipment, that is, they quickly jumped out to shoot. there's another tank on support, i managed to break through, i succeeded. eh, they quickly

retreated, but ours figured out this technique, they began to kick them out, first of all , tanks began to kick them out. and the tank, but there is still a barrel, and here we are talking about the fact that 105 mm, in in principle, good fire support, but the task is still worth it. from the number that they announced, they can create about 10 companies for tactical groups, it’s clear that they won’t be smeared, they will be used somewhere along the line of contact, maybe they will form battalions of tactical groups, but all this is being done in order to delay us as much as possible, they need this pause, which said that a four-month gap is needed so that the military-industrial complex still starts rusty, this one, while the nato ones begin to scroll. this is how it's done? here in germany, it’s not in vain that they force you. and to get rid of the tanks, they must get rid of the leopard 2 tanks in favor of the abrams, because then the americans get a monopoly on the whole of europe with their tanks and the british must

get rid of the challengers and that's it. this should be disposed of in ukraine. what will you do with the leopard? yes, he is the heaviest tank, he is not only the heaviest under 80 tons. yes, they are heavy tanks, they are also difficult to control. in fact , finding a use is not a problem, even if they will bury him at some parental boundary , this can become a problem they are doing. this is a defense tactical nuclear weapon. well, not only with us, the anti-tank missile cones began to hit very well and demolish these towers and all these vaunted armored vehicles, which i remember wrote about one thing and the organized crime group did not hit us, 115 rpgs flew in. as they say, we whole it for one american wrote there, and about one of the armored personnel carriers that he was collecting . by the way, deliver to ukraine. well, let's check, of course, you need to understand that yes, these weapons are sent in order to so that raka and syria are still on fire like yes they are on fire, but there are actually now these columns with armored vehicles, they

are actually being destroyed for the most part near donetsk poddavdeevka, just thanks in many respects to the initiative and coordination from below, such a one works. well, a bunch can be called such a mini reconnaissance strike complex - this is when, guys, regularly, on those drones that volunteers, among other things, collected, and you brought, including to sparta and for other units. guys try just non-stop 24 hover for hours a day, but directly in the air at those lines where they have already advanced. and where they try just in such groups, as a rule. it's 5-6. it is unlikely that there are five or six infantry fighting vehicles on which the landing force is sitting, which should jump into the trenches, yes, and the main thing is to detect uh in time, and if you have sane excellent friendly artillerymen nearby, with whom you have built interaction not over a big shoulder, there was something worth it, yes, and

interaction was built directly with the artillery battery, then just at the expense of, uh, here this, but the mobility of decision-making in place. it’s just that the commanders there are of a level there , relatively speaking, yes, there, but the captain has time with each other. eh, to establish this interaction. yes, but right now all their counterattacks in the donetsk direction are suffering, a complete fiasco, and there these videos have already been destroyed, to a dofiga , people have stopped even these videos, even scopters, because you want to. yes, they decide, but the most difficult of them, the challenges, he was generally brought to iraq on a trailer. and how will it be in ukrainian black soil? i can hardly imagine it, even dry weather, even dry weather, most likely. he will only be on the roads and eat there, of course, he is a target, including for ours. helicopter, but there is still a character here that they did not expect that we would catch up with them in the contour of the battery fight. that is, we used to have these complexes, maybe they didn’t even have enough; now it’s enough, and they began to knock out artillery systems, too

, 155 mm shells. here we discussed for us. yes, europe said that they produce 300,000 a year, and this is yaroslavna’s cry or whatever it is, it’s me on the energy table, but that yes, they reset it, because the consumption of shells is large, the consumption of shells is large. european here they are manifested containers of everything. why don't we take from india given the relationship between pakistan and containers? yes, and a question. why not really meet, he is randomly solid with the iceberg. well, here's the main one. that's what the point is that we now have such an advantage that we have received as a result of partial mobilization. the enemy did not have time, as they say, to set up an adequate one for him, and we have time until about the beginning of summer, when we we can use this advantage to our advantage. yes, because to defeat these

units that are now on the line, combat contact. there is a chance, then, of course, they will prepare these two army corps even a of their 5 kopecks. if i may say so, i put it, because first of all we are now , including, i will not only speak about myself. there about many military correspondents. we try to look at the situation from the point of view of sometimes a simple fighter, and of course, it is important to count on the mobilized in a cool and correct way. yes and one way or another, uh, training centers have started working, which prepare them, but including a lot will lead from this and from our economy from our pc, as far as we wake up in this sense, and that advantage in manpower. yes, i would not want to use it, roughly speaking, as cannon fodder in idle. yes, when there will be just attacks. yes, choke due to the fact that we will not be able to support the offensive with the necessary artillery power even here. uh, of course, when we talk about the mobilization of manpower, it is very important that our industry

of this also quickly woke up. well, the guys plow the military-industrial complex for you like semyon has six days and four shifts. god forbid, some even go out, a six-day period. six seven, who i know, the only one who has a vacation day of this bookkeeping. you just need to work sunday, seven days. yes, it doesn’t seem like there are four commissions that are working to eliminate these things. yes, yes, at the same time, the moment is important here. they talked about planning bombs. let's go planning bombs burning in the optic guidance went optical guidance. at the same time, there is constant development, they said that heavy equipment is there. look how the repair plants have reached the line. and how they have earned somehow recovering that we are waking up. and the economy is waking up, here, too, i just really don’t want to place all my hopes exclusively on those guys who, because it should be exclusively people in the complex, we would now send

all 150,000 there. here, just the mobilization is still and there we are not in a hurry we are in a hurry, because human life is the most valuable thing, but you need to understand that there are no different people on the other side of human life. yes , of course, they have striking power. now the mercenaries mostly make up, but they are also not infinite, and problem number two is, of course, still work inside. so i'm talking to her not only with those who would be on the line of his adjoining, but those who are still further away, who, like the defense. these are some relatives. they say that yes, these here, watching peeping, are the most difficult. here he is looks like a normal person, but he is an enemy. that's why such subdivisions like smersh and so on, of course, are not needed, because if we have a province where martial law is in force, then wartime laws should also apply there, not what they consider the head of the commission court yes, with his abstract humanism. that's because

he took a respected judge, zorkin, he was taken to donetsk for a short time. well, just for a while, so that he, looking into the eyes of people, explained that there was no need for any mortal executions. and that humanism is needed, and then i calculated after how many minutes to the place where zori would have been, of course, that he had flown. and what would he say after that, when you understood what is really happening, right? yes, so, of course, here. hey, that's preparation. everyone says when we will attack, when necessary, then we will, when we are ready, without sacrificing our people in vain, we will achieve the tasks set, the enemy understands this. here they are now on sd breathing, of course, they say that there is salt there. here he is artyom moska, there they can say whatever they want on the battlefield, decides man, our man trained in our professionalism is growing. i'm here we always look at shots, how do they work there? that's how recently. i watched how the t-90 works, then a man used to come out,

he says 20 shells on the firing point patriot now two now this is impossible. and now there are two, that is, it is growing in skill and immediately turned on the protection. that is, if he cakes on him, he misses, that is, you already see what is already happening here on automatism. that is, already people are already under the battery, and on the other hand, they do not have time to supply such professionals, and mercenaries, but they are very expensive. but the truth is, it's clear that they are also rubbish rubbish, the main thing for the west is to hold back to keep us. weakened, as they are still there, our plans, by the way, we also know each other from the other side. they say that propaganda works for them there. so they win. we fear. yeah, we are afraid, they are sure of this, that they are already there, this is it, and it is impossible to talk with these people there, no need talk, do not advertise your business. what makes you

feel so bad? cancer is not a funny joke to you, please stay in your seats and fasten your seat belts. please help me, i need to get back to work urgently. this is a huge risk. tomorrow at 21:20 on the russia channel who is against tomorrow at 14:55 on the russia channel times?

a film by sergei ursulik and the task is to survive and reach and there is no choice, the righteous, but there is a chance soon, i wanted to tell you about the horror that we have experienced children so far from this has not fully recovered. we are together, well, after all, we’ll cut off the cotton wool for this, our motherland needs to be protected, then the heart hurts at the moment when the brother’s last breath hurt. i heard him exhale when they lay there, when the

soul rejoices, i want you to become my wife. you know, well, here i want to continue, as it were , a military theme, but, uh, it means, here, what is spinning in my head literally before entering the studio, we were talking about who, like uh, met the new year and this is detail, m-m in many russian families today on

new year raised a toast to the motherland from russia raised a toast. yes, you have been faced with this for a long time, and in the donbass you rose for victory. in the donbass, they already understand for sure that they are a huge number of people, they said that we want this year to be victorious, you know, here i am, well, i’m like the thirtieth and then christmas eve here are the guys in moscow well, they clearly raised this for the motherland for the victory from the supreme yes, yes, that's how much it has changed, this nomenclature , uh, toasts, that is, and we began to demand. we do understand. we started understand that this is not just a given russia, it is not just a given. here's what you can lose. and we see what happened to russia and ukraine, we see what happened to our cities. you see it all, and we feel it all, and especially people who feel it every day under shelling, who a all the time live in this state already, that is, more intense the last year, and the previous 8 years are also not sugar, and a everything is fine

understand that at one point. everything can change there easily. for many in russia, it also became clear. and it is clear why you need to go. why should you go to war? why is it necessary to prepare? why is it necessary for a to be loyal to the mobilization of decisions that are not always pleasant, not always pleasant, so why should this be treated? why do you need to talk to people? why do they need to be explained? is it possible to get through to them with these explanations, but is it possible? go, but there are a number of things that you know, here for donbass for i think now for kherson and for and for zaporozhye a very relevant thing. and what will happen, and what kind of solidarity will it be? this is what the solidarity will be like next, and what will artemovsk be like? yes, we are now thinking about what name? leave it. leave it to us. yes, but we want to know everything. what will artyomov be like, how will it be rebuilt? yes? that is, like what kind of industry would there be? will there be a university or educational institutions there? yes, that is, what

will happen in severodonetsk and what will happen in lisichansk , that is, these things, despite the fact that now you know it there, so, i think that, well, you were there, that is, you saw these cities, you must have seen the state in which they are now they are in a terrible state, and nothing can be done. yes, as long as it arrives there, yes, that is, just bring workers there and start rebuilding. it's all about giving people the opportunity to mobilize themselves and rebuild their homes, it's impossible. it doesn't work, because time flies. here, if here, literally today, that is, we made such a sortie into the flint and here is our group, and we brought warm clothes there, medicines. ah, there are some potbelly stoves there, there is something else like that. yes, because they just ironed the flint all day yesterday. here they ironed, yes, that is, when they go for something, when they go in solidarity, they press artyom from ours, yes, that is, stand on the side at the top of this same defensive line. this is in the seversk region from there it flies along the criminal area for 4-5 km. and people just don't go out into the street, because they constantly fly there, because they are trying to recoup on this criminal. on

matchmakers are trying to recoup these losses that they are, and now they are getting it under solidarity and under artyomovsk, that is , this is now important for people now, therefore, with these conversations with people. yes, that is, an understanding, moto-but are we able to restore cities? yes, are we able to work with new people who are now able to work, that is, in the donbass, by and large, a lot from the donbass it’s clear for 8 years. excuse such upbringing, yes, that is , the residents of donbass and russia will also teach it there. how to live? yes, but when new ones appear territories, when kherson appears, when zaporozhye appears, when people are literally a few months ago, children went to ukrainian schools and glorified bandera. yes. today they find themselves in a completely different reality. we need to learn to live with them. we need to learn how to show big russia . well, here, in what country they ended up, and what has changed for what and how their life is changing, you know now. but today it turned out to build. just this is the simplest thing you know, this is because mariupol is shows build mummies. but what you are

talking about is much more complicated and much more important, because you also need to cure people's heads. of course, this is starting to work. i’ll just give a small example of the youth forum. and in kamchatka, place our organizers, to be honest, there have been no such events for a million years. so they invited tatars there and there, just the same one flew there and small ones. i had before, and the youth, and there was already youth from those from the new regions and there were 50 kids. e, in including from lugansk and zaporozhye from kherson and in fact. here is the practice to see. uh, what is russia like to be in kamchatka on a completely different scale, and indeed they were coolly settled there. everything was done very cool. in the sense that, in fact, it is as if you can see that their eyes. that is, if at first they were a little bit prickly and somehow perceived it all very carefully, detachedly, then

now it’s already, but just, uh, this one, roughly speaking, the process of communication is alive there, and among teenagers and so then these travel in our country. they also do their job and this is being done, which, by the way, is very cool. i think this is needed, of course more needs to be taught or working here. yes, everything is needed here, let's start about what to say semyon absolutely right to show this country the power. not in a country where toilet bowls are stolen, yes, that is, i don’t know or i don’t know electric kettles there. yes, that is, the country - it is with excellent opportunities with huge reserves with a huge number of people and open spaces. yes, that is the side of the great country that would become involved, they have him for 8 years, who compressed your brains told that it is listen to this muzzle. it 's generally unknown, yes. and this is what we have to rework. and as you progress, as you progress. such people will appear with these people. you need to be able to work, again, but for us, why is it important not only to

understand, and the guys say, we know that we can restore. yes, and we, that is, i give this example, minsk, yes, that is, the plan for the restoration of minsk it should be in the forty- second year 402. minsk was liberated at 44 we already have the restoration of kyiv. i know. i really want i really want to do. here. i really want to know how our cities will be restored. i really want to be. i'm interested. you know what berlin will be like after our victory, but in reality that's it. decree of their cities. i hope we don't repeat the same mistakes again, er, early 19th century to mid-20th century. if we come somewhere, leave, i hope we won't be again. and we very often stepped on this rake, probably it’s not worth it, and then here the mental difference turns out, yes, then there is imagine, as which says, listen, you have, uh, these weapons that need to be disposed of. give it to us. we recycle. we will gladly dispose of it at your house, but listen, i don’t want it to be like this for us. no, well, if

they want it to be a recycling area, they did it. yes, yes, of course, and that’s why they sometimes say, maybe it’s time to test more serious weapons on the territory of ukraine, you understand, if that’s all for me, this is our territory, in general, yes, i’m flipping through the maps, and the maps transport corridors, where we are all the time. riddle what does not continue to work is the transport corridor that goes there through warsaw through there through the private security company through, eh. there are other crossings, which means they converge in lvov. but then they go further across the bridges. and here it all works. this is all over the place, which we talk about, which donbass comes to later, when they tell me, we don’t understand, this is such a difficult target for a bridge, for what means of defeating it, but for a ballistic missile this is a complex topic, it is an area. i'm going to this. and for tactical nuclear weapons, the area is smaller, the area is

smaller, but then you don’t want to use it, because the territory is infected. well, that is, it is not necessary for us to awaken different feelings. you know, when this part of the lc that was. ah. she was captured and released, but there wasn’t a single bridge left, of course, i’ll put up a single one now . all the bridges thought that those were without problems. everyone is learning. you know vladimir dol'fovich. i do not believe the sad eyes of the students. they are moaning about the fact that their military supplies are exhausted, they supplied and will supply more than that, i see behind this mask of sadness. in fact, the joy is great, because within the framework of his political project. everything is going well for them. they cleared europe of soviet weapons into ukraine, yes. er, they shaped public opinion within europe itself, the willingness of the governments of the countries of the european union to allocate additional funding for security. i think industrialists are already rubbing their hands, and

politicians and corrupt officials are already quietly clicking the calculator. everything is going according to plan for them. the only thing is that ukraine is covered in blood, it sobs and cries. well, this cloak hasn't been heard by anyone. in general, by and large , no one really cares, so uh, i think that u weapons will be supplied exactly until then. until, in the course of certain military events, a turning point of such a nature occurs, which will convince everyone that it is impossible to solve the geopolitical tasks set in e, on the territory of ukraine by military means. that is, it should not be, it should not be some kind of victory, on points. it doesn't count, at all it should be some kind of turning point, which, well, will give reason to believe that it's all absolutely meaningless and, uh, and so on. that is, it will be. why do we have to agree with them so no. i say, you don't have to negotiate with them. it's just that they need to negotiate. and why should we all need to negotiate with

them, it will still be necessary in any case. well, let's not have an illusion, we still have to talk to them. i'm not sure that someone will negotiate with ukraine. i'm talking about ukraine in any europeans have nothing at all talk to americans. now here are european now about e about bakhmut and solidarity, two small towns well , they will bang, there are 72,000 solidarity, there were 10,000. yes , there were only a few left who live . this is not the point, many are surprised. why such fierce battles are going on for these cities, what these cities represent from the military point of view, whether they are some kind of expediency or not, maybe it doesn’t . it does not depend on ukraine at all ukraine is here it is obliged to simply fulfill what is required of it; any territory that could potentially become russian should be here, too, just turned into

ashes when it is. we understand, you can know everything, so if you say don’t roll me on skis. and when we well, if this happens, being sovereign people, how much will it push back the front line, if it happens, what kind of capture of bakhmut, if we return, let there be a domino effect and these fortified areas. we will go there to the operational space as deep as possible for a couple of tens of kilometers, move forward, really a few words. i understand these other fortifications, where their literacy is 15-20 km. yes, i finished here about the bread area. so i sometimes know in telegram channels, especially in the comments , it’s not that i’m not satisfied. well, let's put it this way. dissatisfaction, you can even say so with income. so to speak, a special military operation they wanted to solve everything very quickly

and efficiently. it seems to me that they do not fully understand what is happening for eight years. ukraine was poured with concrete in eastern part of ukraine was poured with concrete. these were projects from different countries of different countries. they understood from the beginning that this country would turn into a training ground, so these projects were created and made fortified areas in order to test, among other things, the effectiveness of these fortified areas against russian weapons. it's not just a weapon test. this is a test of engineering. you understand inside. that is, you succeeded or there. well, yes, it's simple, well, at least when it comes in yes, yes, people just don't understand people don't understand how right you are? 'cause when i just get you i’ll stop, i’ll say artyomov. we have such champagne, artyom, what happened?