remember it all morning, full house old new year's premiere tomorrow at 21:30.

our cactus survived my cactus. yes already checked. everything is fine. well then, let's go to start labor were faults, the defendant found its full confirmation during the judicial investigation, namely, the fact of sale of drugs of the cathedral confirms that found during the search. heroines 4.75 g, as well as labeled banknotes that she received from

litvinenkov, in addition, according to the conclusion of the examination, substances weighing 0.28 g were seized from witness litvinenko and substances weighing 4.75 d, confiscated in saburova’s apartment is a particularly dangerous narcotic drug heroin and an unidentified person will be narcotic drugs in an especially large amount on the basis of the above, i ask you to recognize the council guilty of committing a crime under part five of article 228.1 and sentence her to sixteen years. the deprivation of liberty of the judicial investigation of the guilt of the defendant was fully proved, as a result, it was possible to completely restore the chronology of the day in which the murder occurred, namely 7 hours the defendant is a dead quarrel, after which he drinks and know that his ex-wife left home. waiting for her return, the strength dragged her into the basement, where he inflicted two decks of cut

wounds in the chest and abdomen. then he fled the scene of the crime. i ask that the defendant be found guilty of committing a crime under part one of the extras five of the criminal code of the russian federation and that he be sentenced to ten years in prison . please draw the court's attention to the fact that she has a three year old daughter. what is a mitigating circumstance in addition, the witness vasyutin testified to us that a test purchase was necessary to detain saburova herself and identify her accomplices. however, from his testimony from the materials of the criminal case , it follows that no actions were taken by the employees of the ufskm to achieve the goals specified in the decision to conduct a test purchase to identify accomplices, and

there was no need for a test purchase for the detention itself, which time i am amazed at the mediocrity of the bias of the investigation. which ruled out any possible murderer, except for my client, and also did not consider any versions of the murder. excluding even the joint business, the death of her lover silver, even the nature of their relationship, that was not considered. and this already leads to various thoughts. what do we have in the bottom line is a video in which my client walks towards the house of his ex- wife 6 hours before the murder for six and a few drops of blood on his clothes and nose handkerchief, about which my client did a logical and nothing. forgive the unconfirmed testimonies. but if you know the nature of the murder, well, at least ask correctly, then we can assume that there should

be much more drops on clothes than a few drops. and you certainly do n't need a handkerchief to commit this murder. but if you only cry or snot. your honor, i consider my client innocent, i ask you to acquit him for not being involved in this murder, something like that. two months with you already run, but i can’t say that i got a little more strength from this. your body is so young, it takes time for it to get used to it, maybe it doesn’t need to listen to it at all, it’s more of a debate, for example, let’s go. look, i'd still like to get back to the question. you and i agreed on a lecture course. i read them all my promises fulfilled everything aside dispersed without mutual claims

read no one argues. i would even say it was a brilliant read. hello you know, you weren't there, others were. do you know how many reports i have on my desk ? the last third of the nineteenth century, why is this redundant? why? you yourself know that it was a reasonable, literate to the end, carried through reform, which, by the way, was later seen by many directly in this. do you remember the case of vera zasulich? of course, i remember he was leading, the horse himself was horses, and eh, the emperor of all russia , who did not agree with the acquittal of the jury here. do you know how he reacted to this and did not congratulate the master on the end of christmas? christ, what do you

think? remind me how the authorities are reacting now, holding on to the decision, and here the jury is here because of its maximalism. in the end, the court of the transplanted. they act, dear mikhail aleksandrovich, should i tell you, if anything, the judiciary should not be a tool in the hands of the executive power, no. listen, come on, then let's talk better about why our rockets? fall, well, it's not my competence, but it seems to me, the reasons here are the same in this way. insufficient grounds were held in connection with this

evidence of guilt, the defendant, testifying to the sale of heroin weighing 0.28 d is inadmissible, since it was obtained in violation of the law, therefore, i believe that the defendant should be held liable in accordance with paragraph three of article 30, part five of article 228 of one of the criminal code of the russian federation, namely, an attempt on the illegal sale of narcotic drugs by a group of persons by prior conspiracy in a particularly large size. i believe that the court should take into account that an attempt to commit a crime has a lesser public danger. i have all your honor.

in my opinion, you did everything so that she would not wanted. what will you do to live, you know, if you love, then if i love her, did i tell you about this. tell the truth, try two people are fighting you. one is a demon judge and will detain the criminals, and the other. sorry for the expression crap, where do not get. i ask for a verdict, yes, and in your case, too, everyone enters the hall. in the name of the russian federation , ignatievich, to the commission of a crime under the first part of the statistics of the russian federation , there are irremovable doubts about his guilt

in committing the specified crime measures suppression change release into custody in the courtroom recognize zashibinym the right to rehabilitation of the materials of the criminal case. send to the prosecutor's office to organize an additional preliminary investigation in order to identify the persons involved in the commission of this crime. the court session is closed. to recognize saburova londovitovna guilty of committing a crime under part three of article 30, part five of article 228 1 of the criminal code of the russian federation and to impose a punishment using article 64 criminal code of the russian federation in the form of 5 years, imprisonment. measures of visiting the cathedral of bicycle vision should be changed to detention and taken into custody in the courthouse. the court session is declared closed.

proof wonderful restaurant tired woman in some restaurant. well i learned

to enjoy my work. well, something like that. such an opportunity you might think, would not want to be in his place. there's a time for everything that can't come here, please, goodbye, goodbye.

we need to talk. i want to apologize.

dpr update of siberian frosty records and climatic spring in the far east in khabarovsk-4 this has not happened for 50 years, a conflict at altitude due to brawlers became ill , a pregnant passenger plane flying from bangkok to moscow had to be urgently landed closer.