good afternoon. this is a program of who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio dmitry kulikov, in the newspaper wild x, the head of the munich security conference, ishchenko, demands that the european economy be put on a war footing. he is concerned about whether kapril and yulia or rozhdestvensky 23 years old will remain with the equipment. well, that is, by december 23. will there be ukraine and ukrainians and

ukrainians by that time? thought of the building, artyomovsk is no longer of strategic importance, but only a symbolic newspaper, the times. he reports that ukraine left only those mobilized and uh from foreign mercenaries in bakhmut, and this motley means collecting by force. let's keep artyoms from further let's see how it will be stoltenberg reports we are in a critical phase of the war, in my opinion, this is the third critical phase of the war, if i'm not mistaken, well, in the next critical phase of the war and therefore it is important that we provide ukraine with weapons , she needs to win the main address from the message. today it is the german government to influence the decision to transfer tanks. leopard sinen informs that ukraine has become a weapons laboratory in every sense. and this is very

useful for western weapons systems, but what any benefit for the dying ukrainians cnn is silent on western hysteria about the supply of weapons and the next critical phase of the war . here we do not hide our relationship. actually great britain other european countries, poland and so on, which are now talking about their intentions. let's just say that a new round of supply of new, more advanced technological military equipment for ukraine is incapable of changing the situation on the spot. they must understand this, they are able to drag out the whole story and bring more trouble to the state of ukraine. however, we strongly doubt that they care about the fate of those people who live in ukraine. i was in the future. they just use it

country as tools to achieve their anti-russian goals to change. it will not be able to do anything, the special military operation will continue, these tanks are burning and will continue to burn. just like the rest of the goals, a special military operation will be achieved and will be achieved. well, this question is asked all the time. yes, but also the answer. in general, as if e is quite constant, well, it is clear that this happens after solidarity. that's interesting, i 'll show you for a long time we've been disco- discussed last week in the last dmitrievich now unauthorized. i don't know whether to congratulate you, dmitrievich, or not to congratulate you? well, our friend is interesting. eh, spiridon wrote. nothing brings people closer together than being on the same sanctions list, because. you are now rodion valerievich from before donch in one of the list. so probably, you yourself will say how you feel about this, but i just remember our discussions. uh, fridays, yes sharp next. i

think what is happening there, of course, ukraine well, she lied, frankly scored and no. well, look, here's the message of the whole western press this morning. so now we will show the pictures, and then i will read, ukraine confirmed the loss. uh, solidarity is the sixteenth , and not officially soldar, in the hands of a russian summary of the night ukraine confirms that the city of solidar is in the hands of the russian army. a ukrainian source claims that russia has taken control, solidarity and so on. all this is western, uh, western media, by the way, ukraine has not said anything so far, although colleagues are friends and allies from the west on this point. ukraine has already passed passed. well, let's start in solidarity, of course, this is very powerful reputation blow. why because i remember and everyone remembers well. uh,

august september, when the same arrest officer , along with him, and reznik, and a bunch of all sorts of officials said that the offensive had begun. and that no more cities. ukraine will not surrender that by december to mid- december. we will go to the sea of ​​azov. we will take, berdyansk, that we will take by the end of december and by the new year we will take, melitopol, and by february we will reach the line from which it all began. at the moment, it ended up with the loss of solidarity. uh, bahmut hangs and, of course, this speaks of one thing simply. it is very obvious that this money is the resources that were allocated from about august to january. and this, sorry, almost 25 billion. this is almost 180 tanks. during this time has come. that is, this is a huge amount - this is a huge amount of weapons. but this armament ended with the fact that the solidarity was lost and just about the losses you mean the t-72. yes, definitely here. e. i'm just talking about what

vlad says, just, uh, it will be a little long, but i want to voice it. hey bloomberg. counted. e, how much was in total, then delivered. there is a plate in billions, it is less revealing. but the information about the units, it is very revealing. here, look, 410 soviet-era tanks were delivered during this time, 95 rszo units, including 38 khaims and 40 old soviet ones, 11 helicopters. 50 infantry fighting vehicles 300 armored personnel carriers 440 armored vehicles 90 australian vehicles 1250 highly mobile multi-purpose e-wheeled vehicles. well, and so on, in principle, i don’t know, now, if all this is evaluated, what kind of connection is this corresponds in terms of equipment. if all this is

combined, then these are at least two armies of them. one tank, these are two, and two army kits. if you take all this, but i remind you that, in addition, ukraine was at the beginning of the war. uh, in service with storage 2.1 2.100 tanks, plus another 500 at factories and that, i repeat. during this time, ukraine, uh, has practically lost at least two thousand tanks. at the moment, there are less than 900 of them. and therefore, in fact, there are now these conversations about what we need urgently create ends of gray and cops. as for the collection of tanks for ukraine, of course, the idea is original. let's take a string from the world, that is, let's gather the flogged world to ukraine for the next 2 months. at least 200 more tanks, ideally, if you collect 400 before the summer, well, that is, in principle, repeat what they did peskov is absolutely right in that, in general, nothing can change this, because it's just brilliant, in fact, i advise anyone to find the tablet after the internet and look at it again. that is, they want

end up now to assemble and deliver what they have already done. and what they did is recycled. and now we are no longer standing where they did not think that we would stand, but we took solidarity. we, uh, what is called catching the front? and most importantly, they perfectly understand that the russians did not bring their rezeros into battle at all, only parity came, and we took initiatives. at the front. this is a very important thing. it's like in chess. sometimes you take the initiative. you impose your will. and now, of course, the situation in ukraine is difficult, because, let's say. a4 reserve brigades, which were tinned , moreover, were pulled to the fronts were in the direction of solidarity. after all, he never sent them to beat solidarity. although the political bloc demanded of him. this is more than once every day , because he perfectly understood that to burn these reserves in solidarity. you can excuse me, 15 brigades passed through the solidar and in the end they all had to be taken away for replenishment, of course, there were not 25,000 killed there. this is the same journalistic exaggeration, but

the bottom edge is about 3 1/200, then there are entirely of 15 brigades one lay down in full force. and if you still take the wounded, if you still take the prisoners, the missing and others, then this is a huge loss to risk. in this case, like napoleon, with his last reserve in moscow of the old guard, that is, with these four brigs, they cannot be laid down, therefore, of course, today, by the way, your words are confirmed. it's interesting that even in this situation in ukraine and kiev, uh, i passed, i saw it, take it off, but some women protested in kiev uh, these are all wives and sisters and mothers of those who allegedly went missing. yes, the list of missing persons is huge. so, if he understands that he mostly consists of the dead, then, of course, i’m just what ukraine does not recognize, but it’s interesting that even in this atmosphere of intimidation in kiev , such an action was very short, so to

the question of this list. i just posted the document today. uh, it means one brigade commander who, with his own hand, when it means his relatives reports to him. the battalion commander reports that he has 140 dead, then this writes to him. what are you, like crazy? are you going to pay pennies? write 10 dead , the rest missing. this is about the attitude towards soldiers and real losses, therefore, of course, yes, now ukraine is facing an extremely difficult task. how do you try to make something out of nothing? well, here, stoltenberg is interesting. eh, with these statements of his, it’s generally curious what he evaluates. how is that? this means that the critical phase of the war is critical, by the way, the signal we discussed this in detail was given by ryz with gates last week. they also appreciated. how is that critical phase of the war. you have another replica replica. i just want to finish that back in september we wrote that winter would be a war plateau, because everything that can be delivered by that moment will be delivered and the last ukraine now has a huge problem with personnel, theoretically they can

put more practically no one to plant on tanks on planes on planes. not yet for everything else, because the reserves that could be sucked out of the people. they've pretty much already sucked out the main age of recruits now 40-45 plus, i see. well, now the question about germany, we are discussing this with you all the time, max. and here is stoltenberg literally. it's just, of course, well, such unprecedented pressure. today marovets was going to. let's go to germany exactly, so the question is what germany should remove. i explain the treatment for the supply of a tank to a leopard for, uh, spectators of the production of leopards are german production, therefore, according to all contracts, e supply, if there is a change in the jurisdiction of these tanks, their use, then germany must give permission, germany until such permission is granted. well, how do you rate it? yes? yes, you are them. well, here, put yourself in the place of the germans, the

pole, the head of the polish government, is moving. well , poland is still, well, historically in the eyes of the germans. these are not exactly equal partners. let's be frank, and now with you, this entry into the european union is such a dependent, but a dependent to the extreme insolent dependent, who demands compensation from germany on the long-closed topic of world war ii as much as a trillion 300 billion dollars or euros. in general, anyway some fantastic amount and there, when the germans refuse to consider this topic, they complain to the senior comrade of the united states. that's how we all in the place of the germans reacted to the polish prime minister, who came to put pressure on the polish one. it's clear . but the american president does not put pressure on the american president. note that the americans. and their heavy tanks. abrams is also refusing to

deliver. they are, well, quite cunningly motivating that this is a complex technique, in general, there will be problems with its operation. but we but in fact, we look at the americans , they don’t supply heavy heavy tanks, and even infantry fighting vehicles supply aviation on a limited scale, there’s even no talk about this, and uh hmm no, you’re long-range missiles that could carry a strike deeper into russian territory are also not supplied, we give a question. why? i think not only we are asking this question , but also the conditional poles of the balts, these hawks are finishing off russia, and they will ask in ramstein this week on january 20, the allies of ukraine will meet they will think about how to help ukraine. here and open you can tell me in text, but we can read between the lines. remember i gave you this editorial in the mon paper for two reasons why they don't. the first reason is that they do not want to

provoke russia into a serious conflict , including a nuclear one. if suddenly in moscow they decide that it is nato that has retreated all of it, and then no one will say this in plain text at all. they do not want the victory of ukraine on maximum ukrainian terms, because they cannot stop the ukrainians, they generally need to destroy russia, i understand that this is not climb on sounds for us, just leftist not because they do not want the victory of ukraine, this is all the same question, because if it really arises. if a threat arises that russia assesses as real, then it will not seem interesting enough, but i stated my own. by the way, tomorrow i will have a radio in the comments. it's you again taking me to the first one, but there is also the second one, because they still think that if we mobilize, really with our gdp quite the rest, then in some time we will add drizzle, but then what's what, here you go will be defeated theoretically it is

possible, don't throw it at me theoretically. it's possible that any dijab, any one failed, but in this case, when it goes yes, in this case, we return , i think, so that's it, it's good to be safe. yes, chaos on a vast territory, one seventh of the globe is necessary for spying cores. let us need it, so they need somewhere to stop ukrainian maximalism and very limited until i knock on wood. so far , the limited military is no ukrainian maximalism. no. although maybe it's uh uh you graduated from maxim no maximalism-that is? wait, well, here, you come in maxim. i did not interfere with maximalism. if carried out with your name. yes, but if you draw parallels with your name, i’m saying that there is no ukrainian maximalism, ukraine acts strictly within the framework of the united states’ interests. nothing more, no maximalism, no minimalism, no will at all. it's not there. from

this side, that's why eh, what will be said here, now, if such a threat develops, see the first paragraph, you understand it doesn’t care what ukraine wants and thinks, only they are about one thing, but the first point. by the way, sit down stressed this a second. a lot of people haven't told me yet. but talking about the criticality of the moment. and at the end of the speech, he said the most important thing about the need to supply those weapons, which, by the way, confirms the first point. and he’s the main one, yours was the first, he said e, the risk of russia’s use of nuclear weapons is extremely insignificant, why would he tell the whole opus that we supply everything and start kirdyk. after that, say that the risk the use of nuclear weapons is extremely small. well, of course, because it is insignificant. let's deliver here the circle is closed. by the way, what

ukraine has turned into is what vasyl nebenzya said in e, soby. ukraine has essentially turned into a nazi pmc. they pay her money, supply weapons with intelligence and data, they say, where to shoot somewhere, in short, the ukrainian people suffer from this, which forces them to fight, for the sake of other people's tasks yesterday. this, by the way, was recognized by minister of defense reznik. here i quote his words. we carry out the mission of nato without losing their blood, but with the loss of ours, therefore, the west should give us weapons and money. end quote. here it is the formula of nato war by proxy to the last ukrainians. you can't write it better and no will of the ukrainian side. not provided here, ukrainian journalist yuriy butusov well, the owner of the information center. no, it was wednesday, and he was one of the first to write on friday, but on his page, that, and ukraine lost wednesday. ah, the institute for the study of

war picked up on this topic, but why am i focusing on this guy, i know him. he's not that pronatorical he's all on and naturally, the information that he published could not help but listen in the west. here's the reaction behind the suspension said, why isn't he silent? and why is the general staff of ukraine silent, because zelensky is silent, as you imagine, what zelensky will now say on the eve of the wound, i have lost my solidarity, the ukrainian army, i am lost. yes , my army lost defeat can not say, so they will be silent, the second. you showed a very important moment of a woman who went out to protest hmm in search of their missing husbands sons brothers. pyotr alekseevich poroshenko is in full swing in the political season of ukraine. we are preparing for the elections, organized this action, this action is good, because in this situation, because really i myself am trying to

find out there was a figure of 19,000 once, here it is less now, there is no figure at all. i 'm trying to find out myself. and how many people in ukraine have gone missing and the government is silent? the authorities are silent, the authorities may be silent. okay, let's say the information war. max, well, you know, but you can explain to your own, you can explain to these mothers, you know? and so then they go, if the authorities do not explain, hence the speculations. we will not be here for these pennies, who vladislav is talking about. now, a-and about your beloved. you know, uh, dear host, and i found out when i found out that i was under sanctions zelensky put me on the station list. i was not surprised, because in the nineteenth year, when poroshenko introduced me to the site, a miner. well , as it were, well, i understand why and how. that's when zelensky introduced me. uh, i was kind of ready for trouble, but i started learning. and why vasilvarov is a citizen of ukraine

a public figure, and a political scientist with pro-russian views, once again i am a political scientist with a russian view. and for this , the presidential sanctions against me were imposed. i will say big bikbal to ukraine. that is, how much i have been in your studio, how much i have spoken in other studios volodya asked, encouraged, recommended, and i said at least one word of other things about ukraine , i said, on the contrary, yes, i have a different opinion. i have my own opinion about russian, i don’t know, i don’t think that he is about russia, why is it that someone in ukraine and vladimir alexandrovich zelensky, whom i addressed below, said, relatively speaking, he will sit. i don't know, decided me in all ranks, in general. i'm not talking about myself. well here's my motivation, if me, if me for my views, here's the nickname. no, no, at the moment. come on

, i was a joke, viewers. that was a joke, i have an honored lawyer of ukraine. there, he deprived the essence of everything, but this was deprived, uh, well, i know the first thing i will say publicly. i'm happy somewhere, well, to be happy, of course, he doesn't need a problem, but i'm glad that i'm definitely not a nazi. i’m definitely not a bandera member for sure, that i really am not like that. and to tell me this, all these years the lord has been telling you here for this, now you will be like this, that is, of course, i can see if something can be done about it, and in conclusion, two words, e, and people and public you understand dmitry, but only if it is profitable for someone and someone can organize people can go out people can go out if they are given commands, i will protect you other exits. how do you say courage, well done woman, well done but you are different. it can’t be, but it

can’t be, if i explain all the time, if they threaten to kill you right away, products in the sense that you understand, if you have different views, you are under sanctions or you can be a sponsor of terrorism or you can be a terrorist or you you can go to jail, at best, what will they do to you if you are talking about russian views? as the ukrainian authorities say, you can be changed, but do you understand this? i've come to a conclusion, and my colleagues are calling me. many that, well, no worries. it's ok. i i don’t worry, but you understand, i have always defended ukraine and it seemed to me that in ukraine there is something, there is some kind of freedom, there are some rights. now my map my arguments are beaten. this is our dispute. i explained to you all these years that they are not there. but you know, you just understand, this concerned other people who considered themselves that they were also for ukraine. but they were locked up earlier, and you later. well just. well , our paths diverged zelensky, he goes his own way. i am my own, ukraine. the main thing will remain, i don’t know. the main thing is that your ways

dispersed, but by the statistical regime yes, without bandera c gathered all the american powers over this ukraine, so i will quickly show two stories in a row about what the americans think, so one former security adviser about this. here is the security of the us vice president, he said back in december, look. absolutely in the world it is comparable to the systems of russians, the problem with the transmission is, like other systems. as i see it, this is incrementalism. they've been asking for this for months now. and we had to do. it's much earlier you can't fight slipshod, and this is exactly what we do in ukraine and do not deceive ourselves, we participate in the war. we are an indirect participant in the war, we provide 75% of the economic humanitarian and military support. we have a three-star

us general in germany coordinating the transfer of aid. here, look, they all know that they are participating in the war, but publicly admit it. this is extremely unprofitable and very dangerous for them. this is what maxim is, so we will not recognize this, we will not call it. well, it prevents us from helping. here you go, let's somehow get out, we will today and we will help. so, in general, we’ll try to sit on two chairs somehow, but everyone knows 70 about five percent of the armed potential they have already delivered, and now the second person on the same topic, uh, a professor of political science. yes, she is the same subject professor of political science at columbia university. we are not in a cold war from russia, we are in a hot war with russia and nato is not fighting it directly. we fight through ukraine more perfect military equipment is delivered to

ukraine literally every day this week. that is, the knowledge that you understand that we are in a state of hmm hot war with russia is common knowledge. they can’t hide it anymore, it’s impossible, but it’s still scary to admit it. yes, indeed, the same can be said about us pressure on germany today. here i don’t really agree with maxim who said such pressure. no, perhaps it is not well, yes to the question. and what to do with american pressure you answered master leader that he is not. perhaps you meant that it does not exist, as it were, in the public space in relation to the supply of tanks, no, it does not exist. eh, like, like, here's some kind of articulated position, but it exists. you yourself urged to read between the lines and they tell us about it , not the latest media, but in plain text in the new york times it says that the usa and great britain and poland are now putting pressure on germany regarding the supply of the tank,

so the visit of the polish comrade can be perceived no way here is the pressure. directly poland to germany a. like here the pressure of the collective west in the face of poland is real. this is what they sent. eh, so um. how should i say it, yes, here is a hmm of a person who will express both of them , including very very unsuccessfully. but this is a separate conversation. here. i agree. i also agree. here is with vladislav regarding what they will really collect from the world one by one. and here the most interesting thing is that they really participate in this war, but in the absence of hmm some other method. yes , an alternative plan to plan b. that's it here it resembles a joke, you know, monkeys and fools. they said from the tree. so, pick this banana, the monkey shook it didn’t work, took the stick, it turned out, and the fool shakes, shakes, he says. what are you shaking? he talks, but he doesn't say it doesn't work. think

again. that's what you need to think about shaking. this is how the west operates today well , you need to shake. no plan, that is, only the intensification of supplies, the constant flooding of weapons. here is this one with the world in a company, again, and what's the point in this, well, two three four tank companies in space in hundreds of square kilometers. it's not that, it's a drop in the ocean. that is, well, really, if we are talking about this as a laboratory, and also about the fact that ukrainians are guinea pigs, then, of course, if we are talking about what they are talking about now, respected military experts in ukraine, they say - this is e game change. yes, it will turn the whole game in general and they will go on a counteroffensive. that's bullshit. here i state in general. yes summing up what i said, so maybe a little chaotically summed up what was said before i want to say that in fact it is a stalemate and and to say that why is the west for the west i mean, that is for the west namata. they do it. excuse this even

for such, please, games, right? well, they marked it there, because they need to take the next step, but you don’t understand that if they do this jack, then it will have consequences for them, and not for those who are in ukraine and the latter, and with which i agree with maxim so it really is. this lack of a plan also indicates that they lack understanding. if what to do even here, yes with a victory. and that means there is no nuclear danger. yes, it is extremely small, just recently met, mr. biden and the prime minister of japan and the taretoric that was present at this meeting is present in the fact that the parties understand that the risks are great. they are reminiscent of a stupid anecdote, of course, when the american leaders of the japanese say, and the nuclear danger emanating from russia, but they talk about it, they articulate this statement, some make it, and so on. that is, they are afraid. that's what to do, even with a victory they don't know,

you see, that's what really dullness is, you don't even understand, without even. it is not impossible to take a single step forward, in principle it is possible, but the consequences will be unlimited. that's all, so call the computer frozen. it's literally a computer freeze. well, the computer crashed, but you understand about self-determination, i wonder, here is the president of croatia, this is actually what he reports, he reports on that choice. address your croatian people, which is very curious. look. on it's a proxy war against russia with the help of ukraine that it's not clear the plan can't be to remove putin sanctions can't be a plan it's stupid and we're not going to get anywhere. not a loshavich, too, did not

break the sanctions, he resorts to them from war to war, and whom we should be slaves to. putting the question point-blank in this case, yes, such a fireplace. wow. well, what are we, slaves of america? haven't you noticed? you have not noticed that europe is already in this state, for quite a long time, and when but i always turn to application. e vladimir putin who commented on the statement of the measurement, that is, it was everywhere that you guys do not have the instinct of self-preservation. don't you see what your countries are utilizing. can't you see that your economy is being robbed? don't you see what the americans need? these are the energy ones, and the collapse that they create on your territory, that is, and now they are starting to manifest themselves one by one, that is, the position of hungary. it is clear. they said, guys, in our interests. we must receive and normal energy, but at a normal price from the russians, and now the croats have remembered this, the bulgarians periodically

remember this and a number of other countries, therefore , these manifestations will manifest themselves. the question is, how possible is it that not all leaders in eastern europe are on a short leash, therefore, well, they are new, they are not yet quite used to the fact that they pull on the leash all the time, they went once and fell silent once fell silent, that is, as it went with you can see, yes, that is, he only once opened once he immediately fell silent. and you know, but now, referring to the topic that each of us has already practically expressed. i think the situation is, uh, related to the supply of weapons. it is not so precise, how you correctly described the result, but the question of origin. it seems to me that at the moment the west has come to understand that the vast huge reserves of the warsaw pact. yes, that is, which were hidden, which carry secrets throughout these years were imported to ukraine, which many times exceeded ukrainian stocks. that is, at that while we were negotiating in the normandy or minsk formats, the americans, that is, by way of polyakov through polyakov, the words of the arks, and here and there i don’t know the remnants of the gdr and

so on, they dragged in all these tanks, rszo guns, and everything else huge arsenals. all this was being dragged into ukraine at that time. well , it's very hard to get rid of it. this is it there t-72. 72, that is, they are t-72 abrams - these are different stories. and now this reserve has already been exhausted, it’s gone, so the americans, together with the european, are forced to supply their own armament. firstly, it turns out there, like you, that is, they put a completely different kind of weapon that needs to be serviced, that you need to be able to use it. and what will come out of this is again experiments. that is, how to play this experiment is not a fact that they will work better than the old soviet weaponry. there is another point vlad me. if there's anything to fix before i turn to the mole. this is interesting, because they have everything that we called ruts. mto. well securing units. we are here even learned by themselves. what did the so -called outsourcing cost us in terms of, for example, repairs . thank god we are now. well, we are urgently

turning over all this, restoring factories, and so on. it's needed right here. now, in order to understand all these ambryz leopards and everything else, they must come with logistics differently after that. the first battle there, no matter how nothing happens, it will not be reproduced, and all imtu there is not a military man, these are outsourcing companies that should, even if you go, issue such insurance such, so to speak travel allowances, in order to send these people there, so that they would serve all this logistical support. this is also a very good question that no one answers, but i know i get it. here's another one from e, i talked here with one of my acquaintances, so to speak, with ukraine. well, he left, from there. he interacted with others. left right there. this is a very strong thing. and we see it in europe, uh, after all, uh, the croatian president opposes them. you understand how consciousness has been arranged over the years, 30 years after the fall of the

soviet union. and we know. and no one has mayors can't win america necessarily wins everyone is an axiom that, well, puts pressure on it. eh, it is consciousness, and as long as it is an axiom, it is decisive. well, here comes the question. well, yes, before that she won something, although afghanistan is not flawless, but there is iraq. you can follow in different ways. but as in a nuclear confrontation. well, how will america feel in a nuclear confrontation? america says, we're not going to bumston them there, then we're not going to have any nuclear confrontation. and we are so calm we say, but you may not intend to do this, but, in principle, everything that you do leads directly to this. and this is what will happen at the moment when america will have

to publish one or another of its decisions, because they will not be able to delay it until the end. excuse me closing because well, that's why solidar hasn't been officially released yet? yes, ramstein is everything. this is ramstein's expectation, and therefore now it means zelensky, that is, in response to these statements that all the western media have reposted of a certain magyar. yes, that is the callsign some fighter there. and even got out. they have a painter there for the minister, who began to talk. and this is a criminal offense and you have no right to talk about it, because now rammstein will have a new darling, we are there. serious decisions we are waiting for the allocation of a huge number of arsenals that will now allow ukraine to move to a new level. yes, the administration of turnover. there is a moment, another past past rammstein was when they were advancing near kharkov and it was what is called on takeoff? let's help. and now well, in fact, this is already what the fifth or sixth ramstein and the first ramstein really were against the backdrop of the retreat of ukraine, yes, then there was a slightly different agenda. yes, they had to be rescued somehow.

here is replying to a comment by maxim a. well , really. i think that if we move away from the official rhetoric of washington, brussels , and other western capitals, everyone there understands very well that even if they wanted to fight to the bitter end. it's just not possible. yes that they want in many ways to delay the predetermined to delay the defeat ukraine to prolong the conflict, for the sake of what, again, was announced by the biden administration back in april of this year already last year, namely, the task of strategic weakening of russia, that is, forcing russia to weaken these resources, to be able to weaken russia not with their own hands, and even by proxy. european, and in this case ukrainian, that's why, in general, the pentagon is so slow in supplying weapons. if he delivered the same tanks with a cop at the same time at the same time. maybe it's like, somehow it would lead to change the situation on the front. yes, but it is precisely the deliveries of tanks in other weapons that are going at a slow pace, but they really are. and this should not be underestimated. we do n’t have to believe, uh, the statements of our western opponents about how many weapons they supply yes, the americans

say that they will supply only 50 bradley infantry fighting vehicles they will not supply, for example, the same abrams, but at the same time the abrams are sent in large quantities in poland, that is, if desired, if there is a poetic will, if americans will consider that the risk, again, of a nuclear conflict is not so high. it will be possible to transfer these very abrams across the border and send them to ukraine that is, in principle, except for some kind of military task. and maybe there is no political will to prevent them from doing this, even tomorrow, even the day after tomorrow. so far they don't do it, thank god yes, but everything can change. he returns to statements from toltenberg. but again, i probably shouldn't. betray here , too, great attention here these here this pathos, but a critical situation. yes, for him, any situation, critical - this is probably the fifth and sixth time in a year when we hear this, but really it is a lot, firstly, you will attach it to the event at the rammstein base this time. and secondly, the situation at the front is two, and thirdly, the situation, of course, with the public opinion of western countries. yes, because it is obvious that they are tired of the ukrainian conflict. it is felt and relatively felt. yes

, literally in america. if we look, take the last polls more than half republicans oppose sending heavy equipment to ukraine, in general , advocates gradually getting out of this conflict among the democrats, of course, there are still consensuses, but they are also gradually becoming a thing of the past, and until september, the agreed budget, it is the support of ukraine, which were approved in december 22 for 38 billion dollars since september, new budgets will have to be agreed. and here we have a budget war between republicans and democrats. in general, everything is quite complicated, therefore, until september. i i think that it is the intensification of the supply of western weapons, including american ones. everything will be observed after september, perhaps, here, of course, a lot already depends on the specific situation at the front and on what remains of ukraine by september 23, short about croatia so that our viewers do not get the impression that suddenly this is the position croatia has changed there, the president has no representatives of it. remember how the zemmot president, who loved russia very much, a. at the same time, they demolished the monument to the marshal, horse, mocked. eh, over russia, of

course. yes, he just has a personal conflict with prime minister andrei plenkovich, with whom they have been almost from youth conflict, but, unfortunately for moscow, the president of croatia has no power. yes , i don’t think that the content that i said to the president of the format, croatia is really, he has no power, everything is correct, but i don’t think that content he said ah? caused by conflicts for girls. i want to say. here is your phrase america of knowledge, its name should be applied, and a kidok, a possible keddock of america in ukraine, began to be discussed. eh, yesterday i asked one such moment, the leading question of one expert. and what about linguistics? what happened to english? here america passed the law biden signed. uh, there was a time and why does not work

in english. why ukraine is not supplied with linguine relations everything that we want and say. that's even above the roof and no one's in studios. no one could answer putin why did the linguist die out, didn’t die, but died out, that is, why it doesn’t work and here is the list that you showed or showed how much ukraine was given this one list. and if you put it, if you write side by side, and how much they promised and did not do, here in ukraine one begins to doubt that, and exactly well, exactly. are you us, uh, with america banner to the end, or do you already understand? do they have confidence to the end? of course not until the end. i mean, but important, the climb itself. yes, if you serve the master well, then, of course, this is, if we serve poorly, rebel, start something else there, then the owner will be offended by us and leave us. and if you serve well, then everything will be fine, briefly. yes, i think it doesn't matter how you

serve. eh, if i'm talking about how it works mentally? yes, as it were, but i, but i 'm talking about how it is e in reality it doesn't matter how you listen to the owner. if the owner decided that you should be thrown. he will do it. it seems to me that those who were thrown by the owner in afghanistan served the owner very well, those nevertheless, to all ukrainians who ask themselves this stupid question to the end, not to the end. i advise you to simply turn to history. yes, i have posted about this before. and remember how the leaders of the afghani. she was crucified there in connection, because in washington yes, thanks to the usa, remember what happened to the kurds and so on, how what did they end up with? here is ukraine - this is the same thing, it is not worth the price of anything than those about whom. i said very, briefly. i will answer maxim, why no one else needs the victory of ukraine, it is not needed first of all, because no one in europe, let alone america, does not need

an equal partner, which has collapsed to such a level, that is, in this case, recognizing the victories of ukraine means recognizing ukraine as an equal partner. this is not necessary, in general, no one has the task of weakening russia for surrender, forcing russia to withdraw completely, of course, and those who won ukraine are just a nightmare. it's the same now. as you understand, the poles will be, who are now trying to taxi all of europe, only still in order now. yes, i'm the only one you know, it reminds me of some numerous i wanted jokes, but i couldn't. you understand here. you still could have won ukraine, then honestly, i'll tell you, they would like to see here. you see, here's an article in the hill that was published on friday. this is generally stripping to underpants, as if we were now tearing russia apart by ukrainian troops. we would put everything there. from russia there would be a wet place , there is one problem. russian nuclear

weapons. it is written directly in the parliamentary american newspaper. the goal is indicated directly . the victory of ukraine, the complete destruction of russia , there is literally one problem. understand that maybe then there will be this ukrainian anecdote already, which ukraine has learned, hasn’t learned so far with a question about us, let’s go beat you soon. and if they us, and us something went. now america is studying this issue. the statement of the president of croatia should not be raised to zero. yes, because that is, yes, he does not have power. yes, tomorrow there will be no resolution of the cabinet of ministers or whatever the government is called, but this is a marker, this is a marker of the mood that exists, it will never say those things that societies are not accepted that will not allow his party to be elected, that will not support his electorate, so this is an important position, a public position. and this position. she is in the current pr virtual approaches. it is extremely important to give an example of ukraine, we are not talking about solidarity, but at the same

time, mobilization. we have almost re- announced and then dnepropetrovsk exploded in our country. yes, that is, very opportunely, very timely and very much here, our warrior for some reason switched to dnepropetrovsk, that is, ukraine did not feel sorry for dozens of lives there for in order to re-raise yours, probably not. we'll break for a commercial right after we'll continue. so, we did everything we could write out, then we really do it ourselves. don't want to go back to work. listen to me, you will put nikolai yuryevich bragin in your place, you will admit your guilt. no, i don't admit it. this is my wife marina and this tamara is my new violence. now thank you today at 21:20

and a flask with cashback up to 6%. everything i need from different cards is in halva, just one card for everything, a triple portion of my favorite strips, two slices of cheese on a big ruddy bun our biggest big maestro burger from 269 rub. only in kfc i like that you can control the teplek with your phone, it has a high kd, doesn't burn out oxygen and is absolutely fire safe. only now the heater is at a special price. the weather is great, let's go to the park. yes, it hurts the joints with rain,

150 g of a new large package is enough. safe which medicine for insomnia is the most cost-effective melatonin evalar is more profitable up to 60% new glycine plus melatonin in one tablet reduces anxiety and speeds up falling asleep glycine plus melatonin evalar double action chicken, moscow coffee houses

a combination of tradition and advanced technology of the highest class, and the taste of pleasure. in the queues of gas stations are very tasty

mega installments, discounts are transported discounts and installments double benefit is activated in m.video and eldorado pay less. the price of the week in pyaterochka is golden seed oil 109.90. moscow coffee house on shares is a taste of pleasure. i love recommend what's going on in general you chose the head of the district you pvc movie i have other plans. i saw you with that pretzel. let's place the prime minister's power on saturday at 21:00 on the channel, russia.

if you take the jews out of here, we'll introduce you to the rank, this is the front line. this is where to withdraw from the director-lebedation. keep what it remembers, this we never lost, even in sleepy bad times no one does. they pray meet. we're leaving now, stop dating. here's the infusion, they've been praying for it for 2,000 years. and how will the groom in hebrew you do not know, i want to shoot? and the question is to survive and reach and

there is no choice of the righteous, but there is a chance soon this is a program, who is against on channel russia 1, we continue our discussion. here is an interesting twist, i mentioned it, i think, on friday, and today there is already a video we received it. i will show it, of course, this is the speech of the president of venezuela, no one is a petty tyrant, which we talked about, you know, here, what is also curious, how everything happens in the context and in the process, what is the name of the americans, so the guaido put aside, by the way, one question hello 50 countries that recognized and voted in parliaments. you have already held an additional vote to remove the guaido. well, this very yes, and they began to flirt, because oil, well, latin co. had to

flirt for a lot of reasons and exactly at the moment when america said, well, here you are, venezuela, we are already maduro, we practically love maduro comes out and makes a speech. the other day i was discussing this with the president, louis de silva, on the phone. i discussed. this is personally with the president. gustav petra, i discussed this with argentine president alberta fernandez. a new hour is coming, a special hour to unite the efforts and paths of the peoples of latin america and the caribbean. contribute to the formation of a powerful bloc of political forces a powerful economic bloc that speaks to the world invites the world to integrate building new poles of strength of that community of common destiny that

our elder brother president xi jinping speaks about. humanity as a community of common destiny or that multipolar multicenter world that our elder brother president vladimir putin speaks about for this world to appear thurman-marevrov needs a latin american and caribbean block that would be a cohesive united forward, and therefore i say this, therefore i declare this venezuela is at the forefront of the struggle to build that world of the great motherland of that independent and sovereign power that will bring more happiness to progress and prosperity to our country and to the entire continent of latin america and the caribbean. well, here's a geopolitical plan for you. here is your answer washington

flirted so much. go go donated. here you get it. not well, what i'll come in donated. i i don't think we've lost anything, because i'm the president, but in general, in the modern world, of course, the small state. it's actually very difficult. what was the name of the president of afghanistan before that, you know, i forgot very much, many of whom america entered like this, then i don’t know, like this thank you anyway , you reminded me anyway, but in the modern world, of course, it is very difficult for a small state to survive and therefore it constantly goes search, as it were, allies. yes, partners with those countries that could unite and join forces, not only in the economic sphere. well, including security issues, because, in my opinion, over the past 15-20 years, at least, the issue of security has come to the fore. without this, it is impossible to ensure the development of the state. not even more so. to implement some of their strategic

plans and tasks, so the issue of security question number one and what was stated in relation to china and russia i think to a greater extent. this is also related to security issues, so it is absolutely logical i think that the prosecution processes will go, and they will go not only in latin america and certainly. we also need to think about getting closer, at least within those republics. uh, build the former soviet union not only in terms of economic. yes, there are connections, well , from the point of view of security and the idea of ​​​​ensuring security through nato entry, but look at ukraine if for them the issue of joining nato is a real security provision, that is, countries for which joining this e, north atlantic bloc - it's the opposite, it's a direct challenge and a threat to security, which, in fact, we are seeing today in ukraine e. well, comrade maduro, he remembers very well who he is. actually, it is another matter that

we know politicians there. e from a country that is forgotten. yes, there are people and countries that helped them at some point and are led to such things as he has this one that the united states of america forgot about guaido and stopped supporting him, in theory. there, the adura was supposed to induce e to mean curtseys , e, towards the united states of america do. but, apparently, so uh, then all this was unpleasant to him that he remembers, a benefactor who, in general, helped. as for these topics that were discussed today, there were already mentioned events that, to be honest, i was, well, just humanly, and journalistically , made a very strong impression. these are the women in ukraine who came out. yes, and they demand, but information about their e, relatives, husbands, there brothers with sons , and so on, and who are now considered missing. lost and here on the one hand from a human point of view, this is understandable. e, and e. well,

as i understand it, in modern ukraine , going out into the street like this is a must. in general, a lot of, uh, courage. yes, it will not be said not about women, but in general courage is real. so i understand that, in addition to these exits, there are no more expected there and there weren’t, uh, on the other side. it goes to show, uh, how serious the numbers are. yes, how many of these people are behind this, uh, who went missing or rather recorded them. sometimes we just see, yes, as it is done in telegram channels. this was just demonstrated by our military correspondents and so on. in general, it made a painful impression on the one hand. e, everything, and humanly simple, well, on the other hand, it shows all the scale of those losses that in ukraine have a maximum explanation for me. of course there is. why poidu so desperately boldly performs and rushes

has not performed for a long time. yes, maduro is desperately boldly challenging the united states for him has fundamentally changed into a good side of the geopolitical situation, because the main country through which the united states exerted pressure, including military pressure on and all the venezuelan authorities from chavez da maduro, this is colombia, the most reliable allies of the united states have always been in power there, as a rule, in latin america this is right strength. and now he came to the democratic elections. the left-wing president is very left-wing, ultra-left, by colombian standards, for sure, and he immediately restored diplomatic relations, and there are no questions from venezuela. in general, there are no questions about colombia now, under his power, use it as a flat one against venezuela. and then the aforementioned imlula de force returned to power. in brazil , too, the left too. southern maduro and argentina, where

there have always been leftists lately, that’s all the most powerful bloc and why should he look closely at the united states in this situation, which is now understandable, but from their own in general, such rather cynical considerations, but slightly softened sanctions in order to receive venezuelan oil, however. he, of course, with such directness must be given to him a former bus driver due amount to an ordinary person some sort of hereditary politician. he would be somehow cunning if he did, and this directly older comrade is older, comrade. putin here. so the americans, i wonder, brother. yes, older brother, but you know, the maximum. here, uh, i kind of heard some shade of your speech. i'm fucking there, i want to say, without everyone. these are the changes from the boltanaru from colombia, comrade, madura stood exactly like this. listen hard when squads of command were sent to him in order to

overthrow him not to mention everything else, so i can just say that comrade maduro is consistent with all the changes. and by the way, that he said this at the moment when the devil seduces him and explains everything will be fine with you and we will sell your oil and help with money and remove the goid . everything will be fine with you, comrade is a fool, and a comrade friend says, no, as i stood when everything was bad, i will stand, especially when everything is fine and this causes respect, just in this case, continue to object to the maximum necessary to understand that there is such a movement, a special one, which is not a single decade old. this is latin american socialism, the socialists, one must understand that sorry maduro, the right hand was treated, who was this coal? no need to explain through. these are, uh, people who are as united as the cubans, you know, that is, in this case, they cannot be underestimated. i wanted to tell another very good friend, he lived in america for many, many years, he

worked there, and just the other day, he seemed to me like, we were arguing with him so much about the usa, he told me , you need to understand that america e has always 300 plans. moreover, each plan that she voices is the last main and main one, but if she says to take the first plan and the last one, it very often turns out that they are generally the opposite of the same. we saw this in afghanistan all over again, we forgot that the flight from afghanistan has passed a little more than a year, that is, everything has been forgotten. again, the story of iraq. everyone has forgotten the history of syria, i will repeat what was promised at the beginning and what ends in this case is always a big difference. and, of course, in this case, listen to american wishlist in relation to russia. in relation to the outcome of the military with ukraine, in general, this is only necessary if you very simply closely follow the external activities of the united states, but history is often written in a completely different way. i want to note and speak about one event that

happened today: an article appeared in the newspaper izvestia, an article appeared by the well-known ukrainian politician viktor medvedchuk, no matter how one of us relates to him, but this is for the last. at least for the time being this is not a telegram channel. this is a public article by one of the leaders of the opposition movement. as i say again, no matter how we treat him, viktor medvedchuk, in this article, writes historical moments there. and why the conflict as a conflict occurred in ukraine and he offers two options. rather, he says that there may be two options, or indeed. uh, war is war, or perhaps the termination of the abstract and at the end he proposes an idea, and let's need e, he calls or just announces that there is a desire to create a certain political movement of people who look differently at the development of ukraine here. you , dmitry, commented on this, as it were,

you, like me, i will comment very much. i just came across this this morning. here are the proposals from my point of view. eh, we're late. well, so, maybe eight years, well, for sure. this had to be done before the fourteenth year. that's because when he talks about two ukraines. i have one single question. and who did not give the russian ukraine is politically composed there, because russian political ukraine has not been there all the years. and this is a problem, since there were no political ones, everything came to the war, and this will be the main question for viktor vladimirovich, because i believe that now it’s almost impossible to return to the train that had to be organized politically and so on. this is my point of view. thank you yes , i'll also respond to this too. in my opinion, very important. this is such an event, although everyone says, many, by the way, agree with this with you and say that it is very late. zdno this is all and, in fact, yes, we are already talking about

what has died, but you know, in my opinion, this is important at least, well, for reflection, at least in order to discuss this again. very short, right? well, here i would urge you not to flatter yourself about venezuela and the american policy towards venezuela. yes, because, uh, yes, of course, they no longer recognize guaido. and what was his position as the head of the interim government? yes, but nevertheless they continue to rely on the venezuelan opposition, they even call for medical authorities in the twenty-fourth year to hold elections with the participation of the opposition and so on, plus at any moment the administration in the white house can change and politics can also change, but really unique conditions for the guaido. i ask you to accept mods for most countries in latin america, now the authorities are left, some have rather bad relations with the administration of the united states, especially for example, mexico, brazil, they taught pretty average, argentina was also pretty average. but uh, the way this region is now facing big economic problems they will have to maneuver between the relations of different countries usa china russia and so on, so here i

think that of course, but a window of opportunity is opening for russia, but it needs to be used. otherwise, this is a window of opportunity. it just closes completely. i want to agree. the relationship between the americans and vlad is probably in their strength, that they have 300 plans and none of these plans provides for their defeat. here is the same thing, maybe in ukraine when they see what is really ukraine has no chance to win. they will simply say, sit down for 100 negotiations and all responsibility lies with ukraine. well, they are not the first. in the sense of ukraine, they are not the last. here although it may not be the last thing about her. e, here i can be wrong, because you understand, if you look at what is happening in the world and how harshly it is formulated by the same president of croatia. and who are we american slaves, and this question is who are we? well, we certainly don't want to be american slaves is becoming an important issue of political self-determination .

for almost all nations and peoples in the world. here is what has changed significantly today. i have everything right now, watch the news program and see you tomorrow. the information service of the russia tv channel continues its work on the air. you are watching the whole my name is maria sittel hello, the center of donetsk , a direct hit in a three-story building was a pharmacy from the blow, walls and ceilings were formed.