tv Pereriv v veshchanii RUSSIA1 January 25, 2023 4:38am-5:01am MSK
4:38 am
young and stupid but we sincerely loved each other. then some time passed in 2000 , changes took place in the country. opportunities opened up before me, which only the lazy would refuse. some time has passed. i got a family. children appeared. but i really didn't know that you were somewhere. honestly i had this business trip. this business. document probably because never in my
4:39 am
4:40 am
4:41 am
let's forget everything. well, you really will be wasting your time on me. well, that's it, let's forget about this conversation. yes, on one condition. you will not drink, as i will not drink for 2 whole hours, which is impossible, yulechka yes? like a camel, i can go without drinking for a week, for your sake.
4:43 am
4:44 am
4:45 am
4:46 am
4:47 am
4:48 am
why did you need me there? honestly? well , honestly, once a year we meet with classmates, and the last five years. i'm coming to the reunion, let's take the prosecutor's uniform. and so to speak, a little out of shape. i suddenly wanted to change something in my life. well, at least they won't think i'm a complete failure.
4:49 am
4:50 am
you can somehow get through everything. this is also a new system. want to say no to bullshit. now i'm in a hurry. but when i return, but we will definitely continue. the length of the defendant was confirmed in the course of the trial by the defendant's statement that he needed the picture for inspection. doesn't stand up to scrutiny the painting hung in a museum in a generally accessible place. look to your heart’s content. however, the defendants previously set the
4:51 am
alarm to work, stole a painting of historical artistic cultural value, which he did not know, could not, and tossed the painting back to the museum, he was prompted by the actions of law enforcement agencies and wide eyes in the media . i ask you to recognize the dry defendant guilty and sentence him to seven years in prison for defending himself from bochkarev confirmation during the judicial investigation, according to the decision of the supreme court of the russian federation on september 27, 2012. an action cannot be recognized as committed in a state of necessary defense, if the harm to the offending person causes damage after the offense has been prevented. and the use of peace protection was clearly no longer necessary, which was realized by the defending person in such cases,
4:52 am
depending on the specific circumstances of the case, causing harm to the offending person can be assessed according to the rules of article 38 of the criminal code of the russian federation or, defending person is subject to liability on general grounds. for the purpose of a correct legal assessment of such actions, the courts, taking into account all the circumstances of the case, must find out whether they were not committed by the defending person in a state of sudden strong emotional excitement caused by a public dangerous encroachment, according to the conclusion of the examination. it is known that the defendant was not in a state of passion. dear court! neither the investigation nor the country of the prosecution does not want and did not want to notice the obvious things. my client entrusted descent for him to steal a picture for the purpose of profit is tantamount to suicide then the question arises. why , then, did he take the picture? there
4:53 am
comes a time in every man's life when he must understand. what is his position in society? does he mind his own business, in other words, why does my life live on the defensive? it took exactly two days for this, putting korovin's sketch among his works. he came to one conclusion he knew. and then he returned the picture back to the museum, and burned his works. therefore, about no embezzlement as taking possession of other people's property for mercenary purposes, it cannot be arbitrariness, that is, a crime under the first part of article 330. i have all your honor, thank you. after verbal abuse, the victims inflicted two punches on my client in the forest, but
4:54 am
after that he did not calm down and continued to beat him in the room of no kitin. i want to remind you that my client was unarmed and perceived all actions. bochkareva as a direct threat to his life, but excited. nikitin did not realize that self-defense with using a knife goes beyond what is permitted that is why i ask the court to reclassify the actions of my client to the first part of article 108 of the criminal code of the russian federation , namely, excess of self-defense. something like this in the name of the russian federation with the opinion of the prosecution, since the mercenary intent did not find its confirmation, sukhodsky yevlampy antonovich is really unlawful. got hold of the brush sketch. korovin but pursued completely different goals, namely an attempt to analyze his own creativity, therefore, the court considers
4:55 am
it necessary to reclassify the actions from ukutsk to arbitrariness, part one of article 330. to recognize guilty of committing a crime is provided for in part one of article 105 of the criminal code of the russian federation and to impose a sentence of eight years in prison with serving sentences in a strict regime correctional colony. preventive measures detention leave the previous accession of sentences legal force the court session is declared closed he definitely does not, and in fact hundreds of times wanted to do it. so which is kind of guilty. i hope by the evening all the villains were imprisoned. sergeevna, i'll go yes , of course. all
4:56 am
the best, this korovin alekseevich, a serious question may be the most important in our life about our place in this world. i think yes, and it worked out. it is inexpensive for him 30,000 rubles. and you think that you will have to radically change him in your life. well i hope for the best. and it's impossible to talk about work.
5:00 am
9 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Russia-1 TV Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on