victoria nula is very happy to create that the nord stream has turned into a pile of scrap metal at the bottom of the sea. after these revelations, is it worth asking the question, so it also blew up the nord stream-2 tanks, abram, the united states , it seems, they singled out, but they don’t know where to get them and how to send them yet. this is not a quick thing. the main thing was to push germany with their statements to deliver leopards, leopards stand out. and when there will be abs, it is still unknown donald trump, with his messages on social networks, makes you remember your best times and demand to stop this crazy war. now here he is, he has not yet returned to twitter, so you have been invested. uh, what is forbidden in our network is metaphysics. well, he hasn’t returned yet either, while he writes on his network. well , i wrote it. yesterday, two tweets in a row here is

the first, first tanks, then nuclear weapons , it's time to end this crazy war now , caps in large letters. e highlighted. it's so easy to do. well, if it didn’t reach for someone, then after that he charged the second message. if i were the president of the war between russia and ukraine, i would never happened, but even now being president. i could negotiate an end to this terrible and escalating war within 24 hours such a terrible waste of human life humanist donald trump well here's an interesting thing that you know now, it's interesting to discuss everything, because the beginning of the presidential campaign is clearly behind this. yes, this is clearly and the first political pr that is done. well, by the way, it is not clear that

in american politics not a single step is taken without social polls. here, and the sun they just show that for the first time the number of supporters of ukraine and the number of opponents of support for ukraine has almost equaled about 50 to 50. and now, uh, trump has clearly made a bet on opponents. uh, support for ukraine is a political application from my point of view maksim a. this is very interesting. this is a trend on the one hand. you can dismiss saying, well, trump is there. you remember him with what slogans, he went to power, that putin is a person with whom he is ready to find a common language there to make a deal, and in as a result, he himself then boasted that he had made the most severe sanctions against russia now max well, let's go slowly here, because this is an important question. i'm not here to interrupt you, just to be clear. yes, i don't. it seems to me that further i would say

the same thing that you will say now. well, well, well. ok. then then, if this is also i will say that i was in a hurry. look, uh, that's interesting too. yes, trump announced this program to get along with russia let's remember because it's important. yes, it was as part of the pre-election trambay program to get along with russia, i and putin will agree on everything and he was hit exactly at this place, in fact, for the sake of justice, it must be said that for a very long time, almost until the end of his career , this line on the need to get along with russia did not change another thing, that this line was completely blocked. like the congress , so for its assistants, so for its employees. from what, then? interrogated how many were planted there? yet it was. yes, therefore, here, i would not say so confidently that trump is about a line with russia it was, so to speak

, a hoax, i think that this was clearly his intention, including an appeal to zelensky. you zelensky, get together and go to putin , negotiate everything, it was said directly that another matter was publicly said. can i pick it up again, how was it there in ukraine? yes? somehow zelensky staggered staggered and then, under trump, the president chose biden in the direction of literally chose her about the scandal. so that's just what you brought up. i gave. just some volume. this is a story please. i absolutely not about that. of course i wanted to say, you delved into the past. and i just propose to think about the future, because on the one hand. yes, you can not take trump seriously, but there it is the most serious force in the future elections, and he will be nominated as the main candidate from the republicans or, uh, one of his

rivals. well, most likely, we do not know desatis, but nevertheless, even having. well not that many 100% supporters in congress we see how he pretty much rolled out the agenda in the house of representatives and forced here it is a minority. there, the convinced gun was forced to concentrate on those issues that the democrats certainly did not want to concentrate on and a significant part of the republican establishment, so in this case, it seems to me, we should think about how the election campaign will look like in the united states , which has not yet begun , but by the summer. it will start yes summer. i think that no decisive turning point will come in the fighting in ukraine, and we will enter this the election campaign and the background will be. these are the statements from trump from other people going

to congress for the senate from the republican party biden and collective bider, who the current us leadership will have to justify themselves to explain questions will sound short just two tweets about what a crazy war is. well, well, in this sense, they will have to explain somehow, but uh, how long can a crazy war be, when tens of thousands die, including your ukrainians in russian okay, they don’t give a damn, but ukrainians are dying, you need to explain, why it should be continued if the democrats think so, and there will be questions, of course, about the targeted or not entirely targeted use of ukrainian aid by kiev, therefore, in general, it seems to me that this is the first sign. further there will already be petrels. some even more massive birds. they will arrive closer to summer. but now it's good that we paid attention to it. the black raven will be yes, yes, well, what is smaller? well, black yes, well, i understand, every day there are answers to

the questions of the press secretary of the president of russia yes, which journalists ask. and, of course, asked a question. e about trump. this is how sergeyevich peskov reacted to me, probably, theoretically, mr. trump is not far from the truth , the president of the united states really wants to put an end to this conflict. he can do this very quickly, using, let's say , his ability to actually simply give instructions to the kiev regime, it is enough to give the kiev regime from washington the corresponding instructions and that's it. this can be completed, of course, not in a day or two, but the key to the kiev regime is largely in the hands of washington. at the same time, we now see that the current leaders of the white house do not want to do this, they do not want to use this key, on the contrary, they choose the path of further pumping weapons into ukraine, and so on and so forth. and

let's talk about pumping weapons. well, let's trample on the situation that i really asked. i agree with the bout the political trump has already asked, i honestly have no great illusions that america's politics will change with the advent of trump. we drew attention to the fact that in general there works somehow a system that grinds even presidents. well, at least you rectu them , you dictate them, and it straightens for sure. now e about uh, scrap metal breasts there madam, okay, talking about scrap metal breasts. let me show it. that's when times it was moved. eh, literally. she answers. uh, the senator to the ruz or, as they say, uh, answers to, you need to understand that this person is trying to get along with the american oil and gas complex. senator cruz is like you. i think the presidential administration. eh, i'm very glad to realize. well, as you say

, nord stream has turned into a rough pile scrap metal at the bottom of the sea. well, here is the signature of the administration of the president of the united states. i want to tell you that huge financial resources are behind this pile of scrap metal for the first time in fact, exports. american gas exports to europe exceeded russian exports , and this was the goal of the americans and it's not just about, uh, northern flows. it happened later, and the war in ukraine is also about that. story. not about independence, not about sovereignty, but about money, about big money and about the european energy market moreover, i think that the industrialists of the united states of america, especially the military-industrial complex, are optimistic about the future today. yes, i think they set records for me at the end of the twenty-second year that they set records for the future. i think their production is growing at least five times multiple - that’s for sure they have work, enough for

the next 10-15 years. and this is also a story about the war in ukraine. we saw how it all happened. in our eyes, how the disposal of all soviet weapons took place. yes now there is a disposal of european weapons, and now the question. and who will arm europe with the prices that i have in europe today? i want to see how much it will cost. uh, there, let's say the leopard tank how much it will cost and we'll see. how much will the tanks cost, abrams, because in fact the americans have created ideal conditions for themselves and have not yet created ideal conditions in order to almost create them in order to drag production to their territory. this is the first time, and the second handing out jobs. come on in and decide issues of providing these weapons to the european union in this way to make them directly dependent on

the united states of america and this means to increase their influence. e in europe itself, so for the americans, of course, well, they are the beneficiaries of this war. there is nothing to even argue here. you see, ukraine, which has certainly suffered the most, has lost everything , but then, of course, comes europe. well, what is there to argue with the europeans, although today, to my great regret, they don’t even want to admit the fact that they became victims of this too wars that their well well until they are now about the elections. you know, ukraine, i am convinced that the upcoming presidential election campaign will certainly be one of the key factors within the american american, of course, uh, in us domestic policy, of course, this card will be played and again they will put the ukrainian government. the situation of a sapper, you can be mistaken once made a bet on the wrong one and the next 5 years and generally departure from the village it was, well, four, yes, four years. it was under

poroshenko, you remember how many times he tried to climb into the window in the white house, like when he made the wrong bet? here the same thing will happen here, by the way, it's interesting, i'm sorry, they will come. i didn’t cook for a moment here from memory, i’ll say i saw it. uh, in the news that poroshenko said, your ambas are late or leopards are late. now, if last summer, then we still had a chance. and now it won't affect anything. and this was said by poroshenko to anyone about what i would like to say, and what really, e.g. annoys me, i am convinced that the decision of the americans on the supply of is directly related to the obligation of ukraine to launch a counter-offensive at any level of training of ukrainian troops, and this will be tied to the month of february for biden's arrival in europe, well, for me these are absolutely obvious things.

in any case, the ukrainians will be obliged to try to launch a counteroffensive, regardless of how it ends, but they are also obliged to, uh, the arrival of the baydan. of course, they would like to receive at least some kind of military successes on the battlefield, they will be forced to do. look, again , you are discussing important things about europe, and this is with my point of view. that's why i react like that. well, come on, probably, about all the same samples. here, i would not connect, but the issuance of an order with motivation will not be equal. i think the americans will try to wag. although you can put how much you need, but no, there will be leopards. well, i’m right, the americans don’t need anyone. symbolize something. i agree with you on the main. they will give the order, well, start the offensive. as soon as possible, regardless of the degree of readiness , and the main sign is what is called

mobilization, which has ceased to be mobilization, which is a trapping of male citizens everywhere, where they are caught in ukraine, the abrams and the americans acted somehow, which gave the go-ahead. i'm talking about the fact that there will be deliveries and biden's arrival in europe will certainly be tied to the fact that ukraine is forced or obliged to somehow carry out what the west requires of it, just because they don't give weapons. they give under the solution to some specific task, and they want to see the result should be in the month of february. not at all i know in february in march let's see how it will be. yes, the leopards will give the order, and the abramians have everything else for this. i think it will take a long time. yes, no one will indulge in what he did, uh, the ex-president of the united states thinks trump, he showed first of all in ukraine and first of all to other people and in europe including that there is an alternative, because all the statements and leaders of germany and

the united states until this day had no alternative days, in addition, to supply both tanks and weapons weapons. in the total number of ukraine there says, no, there is an alternative, there is an alternative, there is a world of mo and then a political statement has already gone political statement. we are well aware that this is , as it were, clearly stated, this is a prehistory before the start of the starting election campaign. but if so, if there are people in ukraine who say, wait, wait, so we also talked about the fact that there is an alternative, there is a course of ukrainian policy to continue the war. you see, in america they said that there is this course. so why then yes ukrainian authorities to those people who they said that if there is an alternative, maybe it is against these people or the sanctions of these people are being pursued and will be pursued, that is, inertia. in ukraine, no one has yet understood what trump

said the second time, when mr. peskov says that he said a very wise thing about the keys, as i understand it, you know the keys. if we are partners in business and we have some then distrust, we go to the bank, put some documents or valuables in the safe, and only if the two of us came to the bank with two keys , we open it and can use it, if mr. from the bevel said that there is a key in the usa true , and the second key is here in the kremlin, another thing is that when the cream or russia i will make an offer to the usa first and put the documents in the safe and say, here is the key we have one. and you have the key. come on, let's open the keys, let's start saying that biden is written there. the key does not give and does not want to open, but there he said, i am ready to see the third one. finally, as regards real life in ukraine, you know spiridon pavlovich, i do not agree with you on one thing, this is the election campaign. she is still just

starts, and i do not think that in ukraine the military operations of contrasting or protection will take place in february. look, the month of november next year, unfortunately, is far away for me and ukraine will be used by what we call the handcuffs, the hostages of this situation. ukraine as a state has been for many years since the fourteenth year. we are hostages of internal squabbles in the united states of america 14 years 15-19 now we are on our own and we can say anything we can do in contraception we can do until the united states of america gives a command finish this thing will be nothing, and the second, and the second, i'm talking about that biden. he is going to do this far even before that, perhaps, we, unfortunately, are waiting for an escalation of the conflict once the second delivery of aircraft in the second and third. maybe even supplies. uh, long- range missiles. this is what awaits us this

year and the beginning of next. that is, unfortunately, for me, the peak of the escalation in these because in these showdowns in the united states of america, it is not something that has not ended. he's just starting to grow up increase what will happen to ukraine at the end of the twenty-fourth year. it’s hard for me to imagine anything like ukraine a 23. oh, the twenty-fourth year, when will it end, what, what, what will remain of ukraine, it’s hard for me to imagine, because in this struggle, when we have a war, it’s not just a sport. i don't know how many lives we'll put in. i do not know, in general, what will remain of what is called the name of ukraine. a couple of regions, a quarter of the regions here. well, i just can't imagine. come on, that's interesting about uh rhetoric about escalation. that's what you wrote, but this is from the point of view of those who still think, at least about the people in ukraine, no longer about the state, not the country there. and at least about the people, yes,

what you say, because about the state country. in my opinion , it's pointless to say now that it's necessary it will go to the very, so to speak, that's the foundation, and these are people and talk about people, but also about their fate. yes, here, as it were, it seems to me that here, well, you are moving correctly, but it’s interesting how. well, that's zigzag on these hearings. e in congress. yes, for example, about the same abrams. take a look. as you know, very complex tanks that require considerable training, even if we approved them yesterday. it will take some time to get them to the battlefield. they will not appear by the spring offensive, we were asked about this six months and already 6 months ago. they were ready for this spring offensive, what's going on? who is to blame for this? dad already ate it, who is to blame? you see

, they don’t say to explain, yes, and you argue? yes but abrams doesn't seem to be coming. here, yes, abrams was one of the ways to provide. well , in general, there are interesting turns in rhetoric. i will now give the floor to alexander vot but such tanks are not, this is not an escalation. well , even this is an escalation, but it does not necessarily lead to a nuclear confrontation. these are fantastic stairs that are being set up and this ping-pong game that they play don't be shy. well, okay, even if it’s up to an escalation, but i don’t know it doesn’t lead to a nuclear collision, and then the next step, but even if the collision leads, then what is hanging here is a big question mark. alexander you know, i have a feeling that in germany it began

to smell of old wehrmacht boots , such a feeling that, m-m, in just a few days everything turned upside down so much that even those people from which i could not expect that they would suddenly show , but some kind of nazi inclinations or such inclinations, you know such an aryan who spits through his lip and looks at everyone else, suddenly it began to appear this part does not get through. i'm uh about that tweet that came out from the mead concerning a leopard in africa well, you know, they wrote this story and it outraged a lot of africans and rightly outraged them, because when they say that lavrov went to africa not only to look at leopards, it sounds about the same as many years ago, and one of the presidents of germany it was in the fifties on a visit to an african country, he addressed the people sitting in the hall, dear ladies and yes dear negroes, this is not a joke. it

really was in the history of germany and not this is still being laughed at. but today it sounded. that's when it was funny. and today it's scary. this is also an apology. well, yes, they are already married. these, by the way, uh, you showed yesterday, in my opinion. eh, berburg, who spoke about the war, and they are already writing today. actually all this. here you are, i'm all of us standing here, we've perverted it all. she said that we are in a war, and the russian propagandists used it in such a way to use it. yes, to use that we are at war. and we are not in war. she really said it, but we don’t find the war, listen in english, we listened, we listened, confirm what you say, i say, it’s eyelids, i don’t argue with you. i'm not arguing with you for a second. i tell you to read. maybe anything, but he listen here we are fighting in the war. enough e. wow yes absolutely right. dispute no, i'll just

explain to the audience the word, you don't need to read anything, you need to listen to your second. i'm just truly for the audience, because otherwise it would be incomprehensible, so here's the beerbook here said it. she reacted fairly. maxim now the most ridiculous thing is that the ministry of foreign affairs is already a bureaucracy subordinated to burbock. i issued an explanation that you misunderstood these directly spoken words. yes, the words are repeated, but you misunderstood them . there is nothing about this in the history of germany at all. yes, that in the ministry of foreign affairs, wrote these words. once again he said that you misunderstand them, but distorted, er, misunderstanding, moscow propagandists, russian propagandists. well, today you know, that's what happened in general. well, for me it's out of the row he's coming out today. ah, the so-called day. memory through memory in

the bundestag has donated for the victims of the holocaust and the holocaust and speaks in the bundestag. chairman. she is the president of the bundestag burnbass. e, who, hmm, says the right words, then she says, do you actually know that in fact, in the holocaust , most of them suffered on the territory of ukraine, including ukrainians, that is, when we went , the germans went there, and there was a lot the number of victims, they were ukrainians. and the worst - this is what today and many holocaust survivors in ukraine died at the hands of russian aggressors. what is this, what kind of statement is this, even in german law, she violated the law, she instrumentalized the holocaust in order to make a statement under which there is nothing at all, who died , when he died, what victims of the bell, what is it about? these are just words spoken for the sake of words in order to equate today's russia with that fascist germany, but in this sense it is, well, like two sides of the same

and of the same essence, this is one and the same phenomenon, by the way, which baren spoke about, talking about napoleon and hitler who could not cope. this is now finally necessary. we have to deal with it. yes, in this frame, everything here is absolutely. it's clear. this is a policy, this is a purposeful program that is being taken against, and the soviet union is further the continuation of russia, i remember when, at the end of the period of the collapse of the soviet union, they began to talk , gorbachev says that you know you don’t need it all the time show. this is the war against the great patriotic war. there we need to soften ours, as it were, which means that we need friendship already, but we don’t need to escalate. this is an anti-german mood. so it’s necessary, as it were, to make peace after the collapse of the soviet union, they removed it altogether, and they began to compare fascist germany and the soviet union, and then

quietly, so nazi germany was removed by the soviet union , that is, the soviet union is to blame for everything, you understand, purposeful policy program, because these people who are now coming to authorities. this one, and, it seems, this verba and so on. it's not teach these are people who are brought up. trained in all these. ah, what's it called? what is this one called? not trends. it's like training at trainings, which are quotes and dogmas. them. they say it's important. here's a quote to remember. in the case that you are a quote, he says he does not understand, about what well, the dogma should be asked this question. here such people came with calendascopic such thinking, and they repeat these words, not understanding their meaning , you understand, people are marrying them who understand and begin to explain everything. this tragedy in europe will be needed everywhere in europe, i feel like this, you know, the brains are clean , you know, the brains are clean or you don’t like

trump who spoke honestly with him, spoke honestly. that's the kind of tax you will pay with us too. that's how many percent. that's how much you will pay for over and so on honestly, but he would be lyric inside, you understand, he spoke so menacingly, but inside lyric a came biden, the favorite of the globalists. there now he will restore everything there are different, this is the most. tychesky alliance everything will be fine, but inside the sadist, you understand, he is so soft, he says, the old man is so kind, and sit inside and all this for europe dragged all this into the stable before the crisis, yes, the europeans like it , you know, he is such a wolf, yes, but soon you see, he is this one, you understand the wolf, he took his everything and ran away, and these sadists enjoy it. here you feel bad, and i'm kayfovo you see, that's why the europeans. they are like those masochists. they do everything to their own detriment. and they are also happy for it, you know

well in line gets high from it. yes well actually. yes, it all started back in the late sixties, all these student springs across europe. this is the third or fourth generation of, let's say, not educated politicians. there mom dad ber god protested in germany against the deployment of nuclear. already strange nato so as not to be destroyed by the soviet union, and this says that we are at war, uh, with russia and does not hide it for her, even the german foreign ministry apologizes. well, well, well , that's not exactly what he meant. eh, what is this about? says, of course, here's the beerbock - it's just blurted out, uh, other people who throw such things in. uh, relatively here is a comparison of russia, who in ukraine means, uh, killed whom. this. uh, rewriting history. this is a conscious thing. so far, they are throwing it in smoothly, but very soon most of these uneducated people, who have already been worked on by their education system, will be sure that, of course

, one side destroyed and unleashed it all. it is we, they will, of course, be convinced of this, as regards trump, here is quite simple. in my opinion a thing. uh, i'm not a military expert, but i remember when only the official military operation began. e, and. well, we are all there, to one degree or another, now in the people of the information wars spoke on the channels. that's where the freedom of speech is. yes , italian television is immediately shut down there. i remember edward lyutovok was there, he said even then, we will plant enough weapons in ukraine to slow down russia, not so that someone wins. and we will be as long as necessary. well, then i thought in general, and this man, if you remember, these are all fingertens analytical groups and he is just an expert in military strategy, and he has a book of very wonderful coups, how to arrange coups, wonderful step-by-step instructions and here. actually. he then said it, while it all works. they would give more, because the problem is to find these leopards from others to remove, and they

don’t have one, in my opinion. of course, they will be left without these leopards, but they could give more, but they give so much to put this salary, perhaps for the sake of some other tasks and goals, because it is obvious that after the biden there will be someone else. well, either the same democrat, if they are lucky, the democrats, or it will be trump or someone from the republicans and trump had a different one. tasks he wanted to smoothly suck business out of europe. he wanted to lure russia to his side in the game against china, and china and russia understand this , and therefore stand back to back. here in this wiring stupid, because trade wars. and after that, including food the crisis is all the work of trump. he started it, so he is consistent in his history. but this, of course, is the beginning of a pre-election position. he can easily score points on this skate and will do it very confidently. look, alexey, you kind of ran like this, well, and very right. because this is what you said is connected with what you discussed and

what vasily dmitrievich discussed, because this is a fundamental point. do you understand? we've been discussing this for many years. you are this studio in other studios about the crisis. well if use marxist language about the crisis of production and the crisis of the western system. so we have said many times, including myself, that there is a way out of this crisis. will there be a war, because no one has come up with anything else, right? the only thing that so far the americans, uh hmm, are implementing. here you are right about this long story there is a boiling cauldron, well hellish fire, this is actually on the territory of ukraine where everything burns. but from europe everything is there, it should burn there on the one hand, on the other hand, energy carriers switch to america and this is an absolutely unprecedented success, this has never happened, but the main issue is being resolved, because we say moving the industry to america, we do not grasp the essence of the matter. and it's not like

some factories literally. yes, it's just that european production will die of these things. yes , but these same things will be produced in america and shipped to europe, and america will make a profit on it. well, in order for all this to happen, it is necessary to destroy the production of a place in the busy woman exactly according to marx , a place must be vacated for which you can will produce themselves without letting others produce. that, in fact, is the whole story, therefore, what you are talking about, alexey, is what they are fundamentally interested in, the long functioning of this boiler, in which everything burns out. it's very strong. it looks like the truth. they think that they can defeat us , after all, as it seems to them, they think that they defeated us. there's an interesting question here. that's interesting, a british journalist. yes, this is the second factor, which, which i also pointed out

all the time, listen to the transfer of elements weapons that would possibly allow them to potentially protect themselves from a russian escalation , it appears that most countries are ready to give up modern weapons without thinking that they need to protect themselves in the event of an escalation of the conflict. in a few months or years it's supposed to be a gradual escalation from the kremlin. it's the idea that there might be some kind of escalation if the west crosses some red lines, but they don't fear that anymore. they hear nuclear rhetoric. they openly threw calling it out they opposed russia's nuclear blackmail, as some call it, so here's the second ingredient for keeping the conflict going, because, well , the battlefield position that isn't screaming shitty is necessary for it to persist and increase the chance. it is necessary to give more there is a risk of

a nuclear collision, and i say it works great. a machine that proves that there is no nuclear deterrence , there is no risk. let's turn a blind eye to this and deliver more more more more you know, i, for example, uh, don't know why we don't use, from the point of view of, as it were , information warfare, the understanding that part of, let's say, the european european population, in particular the germans. well, half, at least. yes, they feel somewhere inside that there is a threat of a direct clash with russia and they do not want it. why not say this publicly, we don't want to fight the germans, but it's not in our interests. well, it's just that your government is doing everything to strengthen it. uh, so to speak, the possibilities of such a confrontation, including, uh, a nuclear strike. well somehow this, it seems to me, this car must somehow be promoted within europe itself, because these people, who

, it seems to me, ca n’t be corrected by sasha po, by and large do not represent the interests of that country and that people, which they supposedly position themselves do not represent, as it were, but why are we going to play along with them in playing silent. maybe in plain text. simply to say that these governments, in particular the government of germany, headed by mr. schwartz , frankly serves the interests of the west and does not represents the interests and leads to the fact that such a direct conflict between russia and germany is theoretically possible. but we don't want it, we don't want it. it seems to me that i should somehow continue the theme of england why because britain well, you know, we in ukraine, uh, we feel the breath of britain british instructions british instructors it seems to me much more often and more than americans, therefore, when the british promote the topic of nuclear blackmail. they say, yes, why be afraid, what if not,

as the minister of defense says? damn, reznikov yes, he’s right over there, he says, listen, well, what are you telling yourself that they have nuclear weapons there? no, they have it outdated, but it has not been serviced for a long time, no, what are you afraid of russia with nuclear potential. there is no need to be afraid of russia's nuclear potential. and yes, in the end. uh, you don't have to be afraid of russia at all, and from here, as if the logic of logic, acts. such is, but i want here, uh, victoria norren. well, he brought this up when victoria well, okay, she was handing out cookies on the maidan with a smile, and now she said the second sentence. she says, well, okay, she says to russia, we can weaken the us sanctions on russia if russia, uh, looks like its troops, let's say it gets out of ukraine. she says, well, dear senator, what are you asking, and nord stream two. you and i understand who

blew it up, what happened delivers. address therefore we must clap, total nuclear weapons, do not be afraid, and the russian federation does not have to be afraid. what is the reaction? maybe you see, we blew up the nord stream-2 question. yes, of course, we have a long history with you. yes, that's what you just described so brilliantly. i agree with everything that you wrote to you, it does not remind you of anything in recent history as president, of course. what does this remind you of? well, first of all, don't eat cookies. if it's so simple, yes, when you have already eaten our ai , can i be silent? no, and i'll have to say please, because it's straight forward. this is straight from the story in which you first did not stay with me for a very long time. agrees, so this is like a complete copy of the minsk agreements, yes, when russia said to calm down. well calm down calm down. uh, we can

work it out. what is the problem? oh well, it's now i don't tell you that they wouldn't want to immediately let's, well, use them. by the way, i am grateful to them. i also know that they are lying. i know that merkel is lying when she says that she did not want to, but i am grateful to her for lying, it is useful for us. well, that 's how she was forced to behave in such a way that she would not become. at first i wanted, and then i didn't want to, and then i didn't want to. it's great. so you understand what's going on. here is the whole story. when they shouted there, we will not comply with the minsk agreements. and what did russia even do to us? and what would russia probably do, but the russian will not do anything to us. we said today. yes, it was a game. this is the norman format, it's all ugh. yes, it was like that . you see, now they are saying, but in russia they do not use it. here i am, so i will say my point of view, you understand, i really

treat nuclear weapons like the last back wall and all these discussions. they're kind of weird, because it's not an electrical question, it's really a really dialectical question, it turns out either nuclear deterrence works, or if we go to the weapon there will be a belt. you see, there is no third alternative, and well, in this, as it were, well, there is a dialectic of the current situation. and everything they say, it exactly repeats the history of the minsk agreements, but russia endured 8 years, then did it. yes, maxim, you do not agree, you can not with your statements i agree it's useless to argue here. this is how it is easy to say, either nuclear weapons will be used by people. yes, none of us will be left. here. well, okay, let's have one of the options, of course, but there's no arguing here. it's just that if you talk about it so easily, it means that there is no point in arguing, especially since there is little time left. i will argue with alexei, who said that, as a matter of course,

he said ah, russia china back to back. i don't see bye alexey uh, evidence of this back to back - it's more of a show, sooner, bye our wishes see statistics. i translated it here , i will not repeat it, but over the past year. we have earned very little from the sale of gas in china; this is the chinese statistics from this . the conclusion is that china is making no concessions to us, but, probably, from the point of view. he is doing the right thing for china, that is, there is still no confirmation that china treats this fight in which russia has entered with the west as if it were its own and is ready to really really support the one with whom it formally has this partnership back to back. at i have a feeling that so far in economic terms, let alone military assistance. this is too delicate a question for no one to discuss like this, and the open one does not admit it, but in economic terms and in economic assistance from them is now very much needed. china is not yet behaving

like a partner you can talk about, let's see what happens during this year. not yet. there is only one problem. uh, all the possibilities of our gas export to china are now overfilled in the gas system, therefore. how much we would have been glad, yes, of course, we would be happy. yes, but the price is what it is, but it is what i would like to answer the question of this senator, who is asking a question to mr. nuland. and why didn't you deliver it 6 months ago? who is to blame biden, marty biden said that uh, what do you want, you understand tanks, planes - this is a nuclear war. third world war. you understand this, but he was broken, by the way, before the biden. uh, trump, they wanted to break it. remember his assistant's bolton, and he kept pushing trump to war, and he told him he blew that in the third world want. you are not normal people and chatterbox, the instruction left, that is, he

could not persuade god. ba-e, trump go on this adventure, and they easily persuaded biden, so today they are supplying tanks and planes, they will supply everything except nuclear weapons. they will supply everything to ukraine, because as long as there is death in ukraine, which is a question. the price of iron coffins will be supplied to you. you are talking about nuclear weapons - this is another big question. the fact is that the fact that the planes will go, and there is no doubt about ukraine. no. i want recall that germany is buying 35 f35s, and 35 pieces, and instead exactly 35 pieces of tornado aircraft are released from it, which are just designed to carry nuclear warheads. and i practically have no doubt that these planes will not be destroyed, but transferred to the use of ukraine, and this means that if necessary. she probably never. i hope it never comes, but if necessary, tactical nuclear weapons can be suspended there. yes yes yes. uh, in general, you are so

dissatisfied, as if sasha said something such. what didn’t happen, and it doesn’t have reality, but i won’t argue, but it’s the fact that they are going to supply aircraft and reality is already going to. it is condemned here, well, you can fly tornadoes with suspended nuclear notes from ukraine, here is some maxim who will use transfusions. you are, of course, the best specialist. i said that they would fly planes that could be hung up and said that i hope that this does not happen, it is not necessary. and here is what sasha said. he said it verbatim these planes that may be in front of ukraine have the opportunity to be equipped with nuclear weapons. alexander said where he lied anywhere. he said to be never transferred to anyone. he told me that

the planes would say that they would not be transferred to ukraine. i need these tones. well, yes. i said that in 2 months the begba will be a kazler. here the report would have gone already on the twenty -fifth, he still cannot forget it, yes, because if a person says something, he must answer for his words. what are you talking about? what are you saying that because god is responsible for your words. you are good at waving. eh, it's very beautiful. here you have a lot. i'm sorry maxim when we catch you. yes, sash, well , in general, the desire to arrange back with you. maxim you probably try not you think you're so smart. and i'm not for you. yes sash maxim that's enough. here, by the way, by the way, don't turn me on, yes, well, i

don't remember him, so that's enough, that's enough. sasha mind your own business. enough, then, by the way, i have hot blood. yes, i do not mind your hot blood. she got me at all not interested, what are you interested in? you're like like the first. this is a good group. so, you know what i wanted to say. here, pay attention to who says what forecasts we have a long history. maxim many times. you were wrong in your predictions many times. we returned to this. yes, i wanted to tell you one thing, i wanted to tell you one thing only , uh, i asked you many times, i ask you again. please stop getting personal in our disputes and discussions, because then what happens is what happened now gave the word. i didn't say a word. maybe you felt my opinions, don't. maxim does not need to get personal. in this case , alexander zasnovsky. this is redundant, you know, it never

ends well, but they testify to the grip of arguments and the desire to simply offend and hook the opponent. it doesn't describe you very well in advertising. the time car can be won, lost and won again by moving up at 21:30. oh sorry, 7 days until the start of the battle of the seasons. well, all together. first there was a week left. stickermania in delicious.more 32 million prizes under stickers in the application from january 30 mm i love the moscow coffee house and i will tell you why the moscow coffee house on shares is a combination

of traditions and advanced technologies of the highest class , and the taste is pleasure. fibrosis. just against fibrosis with prostatitis , a profitable discount of up to thirty percent on cheeses of its own brands from the savings banquet delivers. order free shipping. yesterday's not the day before yesterday, or what? mogu died pp pay, and which button to pay online? can you pay? as you wish, each as it suits him. choose your payment method with the world payment system and the fast payment system.

burger king delivers gaudo, blue cheese parmesan cheese sauce and 100% marbled beef. order angus four cheeses with cashback in the burger king app when it hurts somewhere here it acts selectively on pain spasm and neobutin stool disorder when it hurts somewhere here technology.

the russian federation changes tea for armor, and a sandwich for chebatuzov presents a fresh solution we bake directly in the package to a delicious juicy crust from the meat of ferb cherkizovo's own what is the best cure for insomnia melatonin evalar more profitable up to 60% new glycine plus melatonin in one tablet reduces anxiety and accelerates falling asleep glycine plus melatonin evalar double action taste pleasure love recommend you to the rank of the front. this is where to bring the times.

a film by sergei ursulyak and ask to survive and reach and there is no choice of the righteous, but there is a chance soon for each such photo from

rich leningrad, the story of true heroism on the footage of a documentary newsreel in the autumn of 1942, a smiling boy in an autumn coat with a teapot accidentally caught in the lens and about the army moments in the evacuation, it ’s hard to believe, but we found this boy from the chronicle of the war years today in our studio those the very leningraders, who lived the chronicles of the besieged city-heroes and girls, even adults of old age. new episodes of the anniversary season this is the program, who is against on channel russia 1, we continue our

discussion. here's what we ended up with on airplanes, you know, there are such solid people who worry about everything, in general for everything good, the founder of the movement. uh, these journalists without borders. that's all right there, that's all wonderful. true, robert is such a frenchman , but you don’t know sasha on rafael planes , can rafalt be attached to rafael? yes, you can cling to these, i don't know. yes, i don’t know what, maybe maxim knows, he is an expert in everything french, listen, zelensky demands fighters. should he send them, of course, this must be done. wait, we we cannot say that this is freedom, but there is a discussion that this is freedom of the human rights that we defend there. if so, you need to help them, so i don't understand the following. this morning. i told the general, he's on the air, who said we 're unloading, so you're unloading. well, we do not deprive france of the opportunity to defend itself,

because it happens there when we waffle fight against terrorism. i don’t hear the generals that you said, we are unloading franz no, we are protecting the interests of france in africa and when we supply weapons to ukraine we protect not only the interests of ukraine but the interests of france ukraine has wars that take place on your territory and look that take place in other places. therefore, yes. i hope we will give tanks or claire oh, and tanks, in general, i'm sorry, i was already so dispersed after him, it turns out that france has interests for which it is fighting in ukraine and aircraft. rafael for sure. we need to make captains. liquor, in general, this is such a discussion we already have with maxim, including her has been going on for quite a long time about, and there nuclear weapons are possible or impossible, i understand his absolutely humanitarian approach, when he says that it is, well, how can we talk about a nuclear strike, we will all die

there and that's it, listen ah, that is, the abrams there are crustaceans, you are here is a discussion about. uh, rafael or f-16 now, and then something else that's not about death. it's about something else. this is not about the war, and you know i want to. here is literally in three words more, and about how times have changed. i want it here continue what sasha said stop you know, i ask. discovered something very interesting. uh, a biography of blinkin's stepfather. uh, samuelzar is such a person who went through several concentration camps. he was a thirteen-year-old boy in bialystok. he hit uh. uh, so the first one was in auschwitz, then he was transferred to maidanok and so on. you know, he gave an interview there in 2010, if i'm not mistaken ria novosti, and he told a story about an incident that inspired him a lot. there are eighteen or nineteen year olds soviet, whose prisoner of war has already been sentenced and should. he ran off to hang. it

means when a german officer came up to him, who was supposed to be him. actually lead there in performance, he jumped up and kicked him in the face and said, that's it. uh, hmm, such courage, because uh, it really affects him and and. e, even in general , saved my life to some extent, and he said that i will never forget them, i will always be grateful to the red army, which means that it freed the same people from the mind with crowns, to who i was and now imagine this was said by my stepfather, that is, this is from one blinkin's family circle, which now says something completely different and about the same auschwitz, when where the soviet delegation was simply not invited this year. anna really. that's very well said about the holocaust. really. today they already talked about this , that the soviet soldier, but destroyed fascism. today is another date, a very important date. and they sometimes remember us today the great victory of leningrad because

today is exactly 27. and january 1944 ended, and almost a 900-day blockade of leningrad, and you know, and i am now standing, and in this donetsk it is called payta, and in russian it is simply called a jacket. i'm standing in e in soldering with the inscription, and good will win. i'm not just standing in this jacket business. because this phrase was said a few days ago by my little relative, who is 9 years old. he is the same age as the war. his name is saveliy and this story he scattered across all the federal channels of russia where the boy says that i am the same age war, i spent 9 years in the hallway. ukrainian artillery is bombing me, and so on and so forth. i am proud of my father, who took mariupol, but i believe that good will win. i believe that our army will win. and here you know me such a thought. so she won't let me go. in what

vein? the fact is that well, now i even speak more probably for the danish for those russians who don’t know, you know, donetsk is all of us, but we always call the hero city, donetsk here. well, such a saying, yes, but this is not true, that the city is a hero, because we do not have, but an all-russian presidential decree that donetsk is a hero city. it's in our langer heart. we have a decree by zakharchenko in 2017 and i would like, maybe, maybe the top leadership will listen. i would really like this, because today donetsk is the same leningrad of the forty-fourth year. this is the most heroic city in russia today, a city that has been fighting fascism for 9 years. this is a city that lives without water and without light. this is a city in which all the men went to the front and stand there they defend its borders. here is what i would like to say. i would like to remind you of this and remind all of you and you of you, or

including you, we are here in a commercial break. you didn't see. you see, good will win and be afraid of this good, but about traphalium, i will reassure our spectators. i don’t know how much this is, you can show how i would ask for the screen revealed here. ah, here i am, feofan, here i am in africa and this plane is not suitable for nuclear warheads not today, and thank god and i guarantee you that no one will mirofalia ukraine will not transmit. they are too expensive in the basic configuration. this is 100 million euros, but they are not sold in the base configuration. but it’s completely twisted that there are up to 400 million. no one is excellent. yes, no one will ever or the clerks tell about which he spoke and no one ever. yes, we heard. it became easier for us that

nuclear heads cannot be carried exactly on the rafals, we immediately calmed down. our cheerfulness has increased. perhaps you wanted to achieve this. me once here in such an honest conversation. so i won't name surname. so diplomats have been saying since the nineties. we really need to understand how they think. we need to think about them. i say, why do you need to understand their way of thinking? let them understand us, i remember stalin, who they say only, who boasted that he was well written about in western newspapers. and what do you rejoice better than bad? wrote it. actually, what we need is not something to act from a position of strength. here we are talking about atomic weapons, you know, the whole history, and the whole history of diplomacy shows that they understand a slightly different language, no one ever understands delicacy. here, for some reason, they do not understand our russian delicacy and do not want to understand. uh, vladimir putin, when the blockade of leningrad was celebrated on the anniversary date, uh, he said, well , listen, here we are really too delicate there. there is no need to be, and it is already absolutely obvious in practice, as a message , he says that a tribunal should be arranged if

finland left the war in the status of a neutral country and agreed that it would remain it, but now it does not. well let's remember how much they did and let's consider it because it is this language. i don't understand. not because we are such cheapskates, but because we need to speak with them in the language that is available to them, that they understand. germany celebrated both leningrad and the holocaust in its own way. today reported. this is very short information. today it was reported that the first group of ukrainian servicemen arrived in munster, where their training begins. well, while we are talking about the bmp marder. well, i think that there is already a group of those who will manage leopards, most likely, it will be so. well, i want to remind you that according to the german rules for the training of military personnel for, uh, maintenance of military equipment in germany, this borders even on german concepts with the participation of direct participation in the war. well, that's what he said, just did not have time to show all this to sarah vaginas. yes, one of the most real

opponents of the whole story. it is directly sent, because the scientific council is the bundestan. yes, there is such a case, yes , which gives a scientific conclusion, well, scientific is widely understood and legal in the same in that including, yes, as a legal science, this very department of the bundestag gave the conclusion that the training of personnel on their land at their bases is a sign of entry into the war there is a conclusion signed by the relevant lawyers in the relevant body there will be haystacks, this is what alexander sosnov said you interesting france in ukraine of course, i know little. uh, a continuation of this uh discussion that would be shown. yes, yes, it turns out there is, right? well, he said that there is, but i know for sure that you notice the same way as here are the tribes african there. yes, also tribes, ukrainians , what difference does it make? that's when people say so frankly, well, god bless him. but about

interests. what i want to say is my opinion that france, in this whole world noise of deliveries, tanks, and so on, and so on, from my point of view , takes its position very cunningly enough, and every ukrainian is balanced enough, because maybe max is with me will argue, because when ukraine began to put pressure on france and say that in the tenth package of sanctions be sure to write down the line, uh, stop nuclear cooperation with russia, figuratively speaking, but in simple terms, the french. immediately they immediately said that stop-stop-stop ukrainians. you are not too zealous on us. press. maybe let's do that. we will supply you with something we will kind of support you, but please don’t meddle in our nuclear cooperation relations with russia, this is how france behaves the next day, so france has interests in ukraine maybe, but in france if interests are in russia for sure we'll see. i think mr macron, next in line to find his seat

, is mr schultz. something tells me so. hey, now there's news. this is the white house from the official , which means they announced that, regarding the possible arrival of biden in ukraine, i think it's just worth reading out and that's the whole policy. it seems to me that the united states has a biden in relation to ukraine. i could visit ukraine at the right moment, but so far the time has not come for this. that is, it's such a jesuit to say that he won't come. could have been some time there, but not enough time for that. e , not really. uh, also, probably, as with the abrams, in principle, the abrams can come to ukraine, but they may not come, because maybe it’s not time yet, or then it will be later. or then it will be too late. yes, there are plenty of options. well, in general, of course, this is this, this is great. you know me with you this morning on the radio. yes, and we were caught by

life, this one was quoted here, and this is the saying of the swedish military swedish military generala and she have already sold out almost as an anecdote. e in all social networks. uh, the russians are very unpleasant said the swedish general, because as a rule they always do what they promise. do what they say, yes, then what they say, if yes, the exact quote, here it turns out that you are therefore very very unpleasant to you or that exactly to what you and i touched on, yes, because , here when putin said that you would finish the game after the implementation of the minsk agreements, no one, uh, finished the game. well, now russia is telling them, putin is not yet he said, when he says, something will go on with these deliveries, dragging out the war, all the rest. when will be said. you finish the game, the countdown will begin. here's what 's next. i am sure that i am not mistaken in this, and the swedish general is good.

he knows what everyone is and warned for today. watch the program right now and see you soon. yevgeny rozhkov hello main to this now, vladimir putin has gathered the security council what topics are heard today vsu shelling residential areas. donetsk our the military is pushing the enemy out of avdiivka and marinka, from where shells of news from the front are flying. supply tanks to kiev, but do not consider yourself a party to the conflict, so who are you then maria for